Economic Freedom of North America

Similar documents

TABLE 3c: Congressional Districts with Number and Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to-Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

TABLE 3b: Congressional Districts Ranked by Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to- Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD

5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12

Index of religiosity, by state

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15

MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008

Interstate Pay Differential

Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report

*ALWAYS KEEP A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE FOR YOUR RECORDS IN CASE OF AUDIT

Voter Registration and Absentee Ballot Deadlines by State 2018 General Election: Tuesday, November 6. Saturday, Oct 27 (postal ballot)

Is this consistent with other jurisdictions or do you allow some mechanism to reinstate?

Current Medicare Advantage Enrollment Penetration: State and County-Level Tabulations

STATE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS $ - LISTED NEXT PAGE. TOTAL $ 88,000 * for each contribution of $500 for Board Meeting sponsorship

HOME HEALTH AIDE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, DECEMBER 2016

Rutgers Revenue Sources

PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, ;

Sentinel Event Data. General Information Copyright, The Joint Commission

2016 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION

Statutory change to name availability standard. Jurisdiction. Date: April 8, [Statutory change to name availability standard] [April 8, 2015]

Sentinel Event Data. General Information Q Copyright, The Joint Commission

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2017

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2016

FORTIETH TRIENNIAL ASSEMBLY

Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January Share of Determinations

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2014

Percentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016

In the District of Columbia we have also adopted the latest Model business Corporation Act.

Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017

States Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change October 2017, Seasonally Adjusted

HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS PARTICIPATION SURVEY

Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018

Weights and Measures Training Registration

FY 2014 Per Capita Federal Spending on Major Grant Programs Curtis Smith, Nick Jacobs, and Trinity Tomsic

Interstate Turbine Advisory Council (CESA-ITAC)

Colorado River Basin. Source: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation

CRMRI White Paper #3 August 2017 State Refugee Services Indicators of Integration: How are the states doing?

Weekly Market Demand Index (MDI)

Critical Access Hospitals and HCAHPS

F O R E S T R I V E R M A R I N E

THE METHODIST CHURCH (U.S.)

All Approved Insurance Providers All Risk Management Agency Field Offices All Other Interested Parties

CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM

Senior American Access to Care Grant

Date: 5/25/2012. To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia. From: Christos Siderelis

national assembly of state arts agencies

YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH IS WORSENING AND ACCESS TO CARE IS LIMITED THERE IS A SHORTAGE OF PROVIDERS HEALTHCARE REFORM IS HELPING

State Authority for Hazardous Materials Transportation

EXHIBIT A. List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

U.S. Army Civilian Personnel Evaluation Agency

Name: Date: Albany: Jefferson City: Annapolis: Juneau: Atlanta: Lansing: Augusta: Lincoln: Austin: Little Rock: Baton Rouge: Madison: Bismarck:

STATE AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS SUPPORTING S. 744 AS APPROVED BY THE SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE

Introduction. Current Law Distribution of Funds. MEMORANDUM May 8, Subject:

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Fiscal Year 1999 Comparisons. State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending. Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only

HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data December 2016

HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data September 2014

Larry DeBoer Purdue University September Real GDP Growth. Real Consumption Spending Growth

Guide to the Lima Locomotive Works, Inc., Service Department Records

STATE ARTS AGENCY GRANT MAKING AND FUNDING

The Regional Economic Outlook

Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee August 2015

Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee March 2018

Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee January 2014

Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee April 2015

Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee March 2015

Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee May 2016

Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee December 2015

November 24, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002

National Collegiate Soils Contest Rules

Its Effect on Public Entities. Disaster Aid Resources for Public Entities

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2016 Q1 Update

New Territory Managers Joining Country Malt Group

Percent of Population Under Age 65 Uninsured, 2013, 2014, and 2015

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2017Q2 Update

NAFCC Accreditation Annual Update

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2017Q4 Update

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2018Q1 Update

Pipeline Safety Regulations and the Effects on Operator Qualification Programs. March 28, 2017

RECERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

Fiscal Research Center

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. STATE ACTIVITY REPORT Fiscal Year 2016

Sharing of Data Between Agencies. Date: August 31, 2011 [ INSERT TOPIC NAME ] [ INSERT YEAR MONTH DD ]

State Seals with Bronze or Silver Ox finish Unmounted

HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS PARTICIPATION SURVEY


Fiscal Research Center

NURSING HOME STATISTICAL YEARBOOK, 2015

Transcription:

Economic Freedom of North America 08 Annual Report (Canadian Edition) Amela Karabegović & Fred McMahon with Nathan J. Ashby & Russell S. Sobel The Fraser Institute 08 FRA S ER INSTITUTE

Chapter 1 Economic Freedom of Canada and the United States Economic Freedom and the Index Economic Freedom of North America is an attempt to gauge the extent of the restrictions on economic freedom imposed by governments in North America. The index published here measures economic freedom at two levels, the subnational and the all-government. At the subnational level, it measures the impact on economic freedom of provincial and municipal governments in Canada and of state and local governments in the United States. At the all-government level, it measures the impact of all levels of government federal, provincial/state, and municipal/local in Canada and the United States. All provinces and 0 states are included. [1] The study examines the impact of economic freedom on both the level of economic activity and the growth of economic activity. The econometric testing presented in this publication shows that in Canada and the United States economic freedom fosters prosperity and growth. Economic freedom increases the affluence of individuals. This finding is consistent with other studies of economic freedom. [] The results are highly significant and remarkably stable through a number of different sensitivity tests. The majority of US states have high levels of economic freedom and prosperity but Canadian provinces are poorly positioned to benefit from economic freedom. With the exception of Alberta, they are all clustered at the bottom of the economic freedom ratings. Figures 1.1 and 1. (pages & ) show scores for economic freedom and the large differences between the US states and the Canadian provinces. [1] Economic Freedom of North America examines only US states and Canadian provinces due to the limitations of the data available for the Mexican states. Our ultimate goal, however, is to include all three North American nations. Chapter by Nathan J. Ashley (University of Texas at El Paso) is a major step towards this goal although the results are preliminary and subject to revision. [] See Easton and Walker, 17; De Haan and Sturm, 00; and related papers at <http://www. freetheworld.com>. For the latest summary of literature on economic freedom at an international level, see Doucouliagos and Ulubasoglu, 06. www.fraserinstitute.org l Fraser Institute l 3

l Economic Freedom of North America: 08 Annual Report (Canadian Edition) Figure 1.1: Summary of 0 Ratings at the All-Government Level Delaware Alberta Texas Colorado Georgia North Carolina Nevada New Hampshire Indiana Tennessee Utah Nebraska South Dakota Louisiana Massachusetts Minnesota Virginia Illinois Iowa Arizona Connecticut Florida Kansas Missouri Wyoming California Michigan Pennsylvania South Carolina Wisconsin Idaho Kentucky New Jersey Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Arkansas Alabama Maryland North Dakota Washington Alaska New York Vermont Rhode Island Hawaii Montana New Mexico Maine Mississippi Ontario British Columbia Newfoundland Saskatchewan West Virgina New Brunswick Manitoba Nova Scotia Quebec Prince Edward Island 0 6 8 Least Economic Freedom Greatest Economic Freedom Score 8. 6. 6.0 6.0.3.8.7.6.3 3.8 Rank 1 7 7 1 1 18 18 6 1 3 3 7 8 60 Fraser Institute l www.fraserinstitute.org

Chapter 1: Economic Freedom of Canada and the United States l Figure 1.: Summary of 0 Ratings at the Subnational Level Delaware Tennessee South Dakota Virginia Arizona New Hampshire Texas Alberta Nevada Colorado Florida Georgia Indiana Louisiana North Carolina Alabama Maryland Utah Missouri Nebraska Iowa North Dakota South Carolina Kansas Massachusetts Oklahoma Arkansas Connecticut Illinois Wyoming Pennsylvania Idaho Kentucky Minnesota Mississippi Montana New Jersey Wisconsin Michigan Oregon New Mexico Washington Hawaii Ohio California Vermont Alaska Maine Rhode Island New York Ontario British Columbia Newfoundland West Virgina Nova Scotia New Brunswick Saskatchewan Manitoba Prince Edward Island Quebec 0 6 8 Least Economic Freedom Greatest Economic Freedom Score 8.3 8. 7. 7. 7.7 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6...1.1.8.6.1 Rank 1 3 3 8 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 3 0 0 8 60 www.fraserinstitute.org l Fraser Institute