Step up/step Down Guidance CAF/CIN Support

Similar documents
The Cornwall Framework for the Assessment of Children, Young People and their Families

Member of staff has concerns for child s welfare

The Cornwall Framework for the Assessment of Children, Young People and their Families

Children & Families - Family Contact Point Protocol

Family Services. Document control. Document title. CAF Team Operational model. Document description. Document author.

4LSAB Safeguarding Adults Escalation Protocol

Safeguarding Adults Reviews Protocol

The interface between Western Australian Family Support Networks. and. The Department for Child Protection and Family Support

Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Adult Safeguarding Partnership Board Safeguarding Adult Reviews (SAR) Protocol

Wiltshire Safeguarding Children Board Multi agency Pre-birth Protocol to Safeguard Unborn Babies. December 2015

Brent Children and Families Social Care Locality Service and Care Planning. Standards in Child Protection Work for social workers and managers

Adult Social Care Large Scale Enquiry (Safeguarding Adults) Procedure

Family Support & Intervention Service Operational Policy Reference Number:

12. Safeguarding Enquiries: Responding to a Concern

SAFEGUARDING CHILDEN POLICY. Policy Reference: Version: 1 Status: Approved

Norfolk Safeguarding Adults Board

DELIVERING THE CARE PROGRAMME APPROACH IN WALES

Disagreement between agencies about threshold judgements. Disagreement within agencies about the appropriate course of safeguarding action

Appendix 5 TAYSIDE LOOKED AFTER CHILDREN S NURSING SERVICE. Service Specification

A Case Review Process for NHS Trusts and Foundation Trusts

A National Model of Care for Paediatric Healthcare Services in Ireland Chapter 4: Vision for Paediatric Health Services

Health and Wellbeing Board 25th January 2018

Safeguarding & Wellbeing Policy

2. Audience The audience for this document is the London NHS Commissioner MCA Steering Board.

Local Authority Designated Officer Annual Report. April 2015 to March 2016

Choice on Discharge Policy

Medway Safeguarding Children Board. Resolving Professional Differences Escalation Policy

Guidance on Referral Processes between:

Keeping Children and Young People Safe from Harm, Abuse and Neglect

Stockport All Agency Safeguarding Adult Review (SAR) Protocol

NORTH WALES CLINICAL STRATEGY. PRIMARY CARE & COMMUNITY SERVICES SBAR REPORT February 2010

Low Medium High Critical Business Impact: X Changes are important, but urgent implementation is not required, incorporate into your existing workflow.

NHS 111 Clinical Governance Information Pack

POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR THE JOINT AGENCY PANEL FOR CHILDREN WITH COMPLEX, MULTIPLE AND HIGH LEVEL NEEDS 27/01/09

Bromley CCG Quality Framework: Procurement/ Contracting/ Contract monitoring Nov 2014

Inquiry into regulation of care for older people. Scottish Social Services Council (SSSC)

Standard Operating Procedure Caseload Handover Health Visitor to School Nurse

Care Programme Approach (CPA) Policy

JOB DESCRIPTION. Background and Context

Inspection of Children s Services. in City of Cardiff Council

SFHGEN20 Enable carers to support individuals

Warwickshire. Domestic Abuse Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conference (MARAC) Operating Protocol

ADVOCATES CODE OF PRACTICE

Early Help MASH Desk. Business Processes and Procedures. Version 7_7. Date 28/08/2015 [IL0: UNCLASSIFIED] 1

Mental Health (Wales) Measure Implementing the Mental Health (Wales) Measure Guidance for Local Health Boards and Local Authorities

User Requirements Specification. Family Health Assessment. For. Version v.10. Prepared by BSO. December FHA URS v 10 MC

Skills for Care and the Care Bill frequently asked questions

SFHGEN20 - SQA Code HC79 04 Enable carers to support individuals

Pam Jones, Associate Director Safeguarding.

ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES POLICY FOR CONTINUING HEALTHCARE FUNDED INDIVIDUALS

NHS Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards Guidance for Managing Authorities

CLINICAL RESEARCH POLICY

THE ROLE OF COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH TEAMS IN DELIVERING COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES

RQIA Provider Guidance Nursing Homes

General Dental Council and General Medical Council initial stages audit review

Kent and Medway Ambulance Mental Health Referral Pathway Protocol

NICE guideline Published: 17 September 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ng21

Update to the Resolution and Escalation process used by Children, Education and Families

ADASS Safeguarding Adults Policy Network. Guidance. June 2016

Assessment Framework for Designated Centres for Persons (Children and Adults) with Disabilities

Director of Nursing and Patient Safety. Named Nurse Safeguarding Children & Head of Safeguarding

TRUST WIDE CARE PROGRAMME APPROACH POLICY (INCLUDING ARRANGEMENTS FOR STANDARD CARE PLAN)

Summary guide: Safeguarding Adults: Pan Lancashire and Cumbria Multi Agency Policy and Procedures. For partner agencies staff and volunteers

High level guidance to support a shared view of quality in general practice

NHS Continuing Healthcare and Joint Packages of Health and Social Care Services Commissioning Policy

SCR FJ AGENCY IMR INTEGRATED ACTION POINTS

RQIA Provider Guidance Day Care Settings

SABP/INFORMATIONSECURITY- SUMMARY CARE RECORD ACCESS/0003

Multi-Agency Safeguarding Competency Framework

Admiral Nurse Standards

Performance Evaluation Report Pembrokeshire County Council Social Services

Promoting the health and wellbeing of looked after children and young people:

Solace Women s Aid Family Support Worker Job Description

Good decision making: Investigations and threshold criteria guidance

Crest Healthcare Limited - 10 Oak Tree Lane

DIAGNOSTIC CLINICAL TESTS AND SCREENING PROCEDURES MANAGEMENT POLICY

JOB DESCRIPTION. The post holder will take a key role in leading and developing the Stroke specialist nursing service across the organisation.

Monitoring visit of Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council Children s Services

BARNSLEY CHILD AND ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE (CAMHS) CHILDREN IN CARE (CiC) PATHWAY

Stage 4: Investigation process

CHILDREN, EDUCATION, LIBRARIES & SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE. 15 November 2017

Social care common inspection framework (SCCIF): boarding schools and residential special schools

Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols

CHILDREN S & YOUNG PEOPLE S CONTINUING CARE POLICY

Foreword 1. 1 Introduction 3. 2 Definition of a Vulnerable Adult 5. 3 Aims and Objectives 6. 4 Principles 7. 5 Rights and Responsibilities 8

CSCB escalation policy Resolving professional differences 2015

REPORT TO MERTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY

Brookfield Nursing Home

Escalation Policy. Resolution of professional disagreements in work relating to the safety of children

Hospital Generated Inter-Speciality Referral Policy Supporting people in Dorset to lead healthier lives

Policy for the use of Leave under Section 17 of the Mental Health Act 1983 (as amended) Version: 9

Appendix 5. Safeguarding Adults and Pressure Ulcer Protocol: Deciding whether to refer to the Safeguarding Adults Procedures

Annual Review and Evaluation of Performance 2012/2013. Torfaen County Borough Council

Common Assessment Framework for Adults

Review by RQIA of Northern Ireland Single Assessment Tool Stage One

Our next phase of regulation A more targeted, responsive and collaborative approach

Memorandum of Understanding. between. Healthcare Inspectorate Wales. and. NHS Wales National Collaborative Commissioning Unit

Safeguarding Vulnerable Adults Policy and Procedures

Children, Families & Community Health Service Quality Assurance Framework

SAFEGUARDING ADULTS POLICY

Transcription:

Step up/step Down Guidance CAF/CIN Support September 2013

IMPLEMENTATION OF STEP UP/STEP DOWN PROCESS The purpose of this guidance is to support staff in Universal Services, Social Care Teams and other agencies, in achieving progression both upwards and downwards through the levels of support available to children and their families. The desired outcome is that all interventions are proportionate to the child s needs and at the optimum level to have the maximum impact and benefit for the child/family, using resources in the most efficient manner. The child and family should experience the process as seamless and without delay. Key relationships should be maintained where this is in the child s best interest. The Step Up/Step Down process will be strengthened to improve the experience for children and families where their needs escalate and de-escalate, specifically to ensure a smooth transition across the interface between the CAF (Common Assessment Framework) process and Children s Social Care services. The needs of these families can be effectively met if within the agreed Step Up/Step Down process there is consistency, a culture of working together with collective responsibility, a trusting relationship between practitioners, and the recognition that one size does not fit all. With this in mind, particular attention has been given to establishing clear and simple processes for those children, young people and families who no longer meet the criteria for Children s Social Care (Step Down). There has been recognition that differentiated processes are needed in different situations to provide the best transition of support. Principles: Families tell their story once Key information and assessment conclusions (including intervention plan) are transferable across services (with family consent in place) Families are kept informed/know who to contact Transfer process is timely a prompt response Clarity about who is lead person/lead professional Promotes credibility, trust and respect for staff working in universal and targeted services Clear roles, responsibilities and accountability Step down process avoids duplication and is clear, simple and deliverable STEP UP : A service request is made to Social Care Services for a child currently supported within the Team Around the Child (TAC) /Integrated Service. STEP DOWN : A service request is made to TAC/Integrated Team provision for a child currently supported by Social Care Services (an open case) 1

1. Step Up Referral from Professional L3 1.1 If Children s social care receives a referral that clearly does not meet the criteria for an assessment as a child in need, referrer to be contacted and the outcome of the decision to be made known. If appropriate, encourage the referrer to start a CAF to offer on-going support to the family. 1.2 If professional is unsure how to complete a CAF, Social Worker to complete CAF information sheet and email to CAF team. CAF Team to contact referrer and offer support. 2. Step Up If a CAF is already in existence 2.1 A child who has been assessed via the Common Assessment Framework and is being supported by a Team around the Child may need a service from a Social Care Team. This could be because the child s needs have changed or escalated. The child may require a different service to that offered by the TAC, or may require a specialist service in addition to that offered by the TAC. 2.2 The TAC (or any individual member) may at any point conclude that a specialist intervention is necessary. If a child protection concern is identified, a referral should be made without delay via Crossfield Mill. Other concerns should first be discussed with the professionals line Manager. The guiding document in relation to thresholds: Children s Needs and Response Framework is available at (http://greatermanchesterscb.proceduresonline.com/chapters/p_thresholds.html). Where it is not clear that a referral is required, please consult the threshold guidance, or seek your manager s advice. Being clear about thresholds will avoid unnecessary requests or assessments, saving time and resources in both services. It also avoids subjecting children and families to these processes unnecessarily. 2.3 Consent should be sought from the family prior to a step up request, unless it is not possible to obtain consent and delay would be detrimental, or unless seeking consent would place the child at increased risk of significant harm. Any decision to proceed without consent should be taken in consultation with the Line Manager of the relevant agency. Guidance on information sharing and informed consent can be found at: www.education.gov.uk/childrenandyoungpeople/strategy/integratedworking/a0 072915/information-sharing 2.4 For all step up requests, complete a Multi-Agency Referral form and send via email with the Common Assessment (CAF), the TAC delivery plan, and record of the last TAC meeting to Childcare.duty@rochdale.gcsx.gov.uk 2.5 Where the referrer is not the lead professional (i.e. may not be aware of whether there is an active CAF) they should: Be familiar with the threshold criteria for Social Care intervention. Be familiar with Rochdale s Safeguarding Procedures. Follow Rochdale s Children Social Care referral process Follow their agencies recording policy indicating on their records that referral to Social Care has been made. 2.6 If the service request to Social Care Services is not accepted by the First Response Team as meeting the child in need threshold, the TAC should continue as before, although 2

a further request should be made if concerns escalate in future. Lead Professional should be informed of the decision. 2.7 If the case is allocated for an Initial Assessment within Social Care Services, a social worker will contact the family and partner agencies already involved with the child. Any service provided by TAC should continue while the Initial Assessment or S47 enquiry is carried out. Communication must take place between the Social Care Team and the TAC Lead Professional to ensure service provision is maintained until the conclusion of the assessment. 2.8 If, following initial assessment, the child is assessed to be in need and Social Care Services provide a service, the allocated social worker will assume the lead professional role and will convene a Child in Need meeting within 7 days or Child Protection Conference as appropriate within 15 days. Those professionals already involved should be invited to these meetings. 2.9 Social Care Services will convene reviews of the CIN Plan every four weeks with the aim to offer support and to reduce the need for Social Care involvement. 3. Accessing CAF/TAC Services as an outcome of an Initial Assessment 3.1 Following an Initial Assessment, the child may not be considered a Child In Need and support from CAF/TAC identified and agreed with the family. The Social Worker (First Response Team) should communicate the decision to the family and establish whether they wish to be supported through a CAF. 3.2 If the family wish to gain support via the CAF process, the agreement letter is to be completed and the CAF information sheet completed and emailed back to the CAF Team: CAF.Team@Rochdale.gov.uk 3.3 The CAF Team will contact the referrer and family to establish a CAF if consent has been given. (The CAF is an assessment tool and a voluntary process requiring the willingness/consent of the parent/ carer/ YP to engage. It should not be a conditional factor of closing a case or a recommended course of action to be undertaken by another agency. If the family do not wish to engage with the CAF and do not meet the threshold criteria for statutory intervention then this decision should be respected). 3.4 If the family requests support/further intervention through a CAF/TAC, CAF Team to Identify and agree a LP within the family s professional network of support (if possible) and take the CAF to the next available TAC meeting. The CAF Team will offer support to the Lead Professional to complete the CAF or update the TAC. 4. Step Down (from Child in Need to CAF/TAC) 4.1 Criteria: Social Care Services should always aim to reduce their involvement as the child s needs become met. If, when a decision has been made that a child is no longer a child in need, but an on-going level of support is required and the family have given explicit and informed consent to the support and to information being shared, then Social Care Services should seek support from TAC via the step down process. 4.2 Decision to initiate step down : The decision to refer for Step Down will be made by the Social Care Service Team Manager, in conjunction with the social worker. This may have been informed by a child in need review meeting. Cases must not be stepped down so that 3

children s cases can be monitored or in order to make an onward referral to another agency. 4.3 The Lead Social Worker will identify a Lead Professional at the CIN meeting and this professional would complete the CAF and ensure that parental consent has been gained by the social worker using the consent form. 5. Step Down (from CP and Court Team to CIN to CAF) 5.1 *Please note that if a child has a child protection plan then they would step down to Child in Need for a minimum of 3 months before consideration to step down to a CAF. 5.2 Prior to any agreement to step down from CIN to CAF following CP procedures, the Social Worker and Team Manager need to be clear that any unmet need can be managed under CAF or Universal services. The Social Worker will consult with the child/ family about whether they would like to be supported through the CAF process following the CIN Planning. 5.3 In the event that the family choose to be supported through the CAF process, the social worker will need to consult with the professionals working alongside the family and agree who could take the role of Lead Professional and gain consent for a CAF. 5.4 Social Worker to complete CAF information and email back to the CAF Team: CAF.Team@Rochdale.gov.uk 5.5 The outcome of the CIN Review/TAC Meeting will be to close the case to Children s Social Care. Social Worker to then follow agency protocols for closing a case. 5.6 If continued CAF support, agencies follow the CAF/TAC process until the family decides they no longer need this support or there are no identified needs that cannot be managed via Universal services 5.7 If the family choose not to be supported via the CAF process and there are no other needs noted, Social Worker to record this on ICS and close the case. The identified Lead Professional should hold regular TAC meetings 4