Innovation Village, Cal Poly Pomona Economic Benefits Analysis City of Pomona

Similar documents
AOA 2012 Annual Conference San Francisco, CA January 11, Emerging Issues: Property Development Best Practices for Public/Private Partnership

Economic Impact of the proposed The Medical University of South Carolina

I-605 CORRIDOR HOT SPOT INTERCHANGES

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE DOWNTOWN "CONVADIUM" PROPOSAL

The Economic Impact During FY 2015 of New Mexico's Business Incubators

VI. UNIVERSITY PURCHASING AND PAYROLL

Request for Proposals (RFP) For Restaurant Consulting Services 1657 Ocean Avenue

CVEP Business Incubation Impact City-County Conference March 16, Growth with a sustainable attitude focused on profit, people, and planet.

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NATIONAL HERITAGE AREAS: A CASE STUDY APPROACH

Economic Development Strategic Plan Executive Summary Delta County, CO. Prepared By:

Innovation. Impact. Illinois.

Estimating the Economic Contributions of the Utah Science Technology and Research Initiative (USTAR) to the Utah Economy

CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK N.W.C. - VALLEY BLVD. & TEMPLE AVE. POMONA, CA

The Impact of DoD Contracting on Maryland s Economy. Michael Siers, Senior Economist Regional Economic Studies Institute

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Business Commons

KRS Global Biotechnology Inc. Catalyst Fund Application (TTC) to Governor s Office Of Economic Development

Public/Private Partnership Program. November 4, 2013

Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Wright State University

CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER WEST TOWER PROJECT

Cal Poly Pomona Request for Clarification for Lanterman Development Center Land Development Consultant RFC

Job Creation Bonus (JCB) Program Guidelines & Application. City of Titusville Downtown Community Redevelopment Agency

Regional Health Care as an Economic Generator Economic Impact Assessment Dothan, Alabama Health Care Industry

City of Albany Industrial Development Agency (CAIDA)

Testimony of. Before the House Armed Services Committee on the Economic Consequences of Defense Sequestration. October 26, 2011

The Loop Media Hub. Gigabit Economic Development Impact Statement. Prepared for: The Loop Media Hub Feasability Study. June 27, 2012.

THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA M E M O R A N D U M

County Commissioners Association of Ohio

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN. Adopted by the Riverbank City Council March 2011

Economic Development Subsidy Report Pursuant to Government Code Section 53083

The SoNo Collection Norwalk, CT

City of Dallas Office of Economic Development Public/Private Partnership Program. February 21, 2012

INDIRECT COST ALLOCATION PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2016

4.b. 6/22/2017. Local Agency Formation Commission. George J. Spiliotis, Executive Officer

Serving the Community Well:

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION

ABOUT. Total One-Time (Construction) Economic Impacts. Total Recurring Economic Impacts 1,571 jobs $70.0 million in salaries $209.2 million in output

The Economic Impacts of Idaho s Nonprofit Organizations

Department Edmonton Economic Development Corp.

GREATER PHOENIX ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT Chris Camacho, President & CEO

Portland Economic Opportunities Analysis October 2012

Allocation of General Fund. Program Allocation. PARKS Director: Jim Dunwiddie

Regional Projections to 2040: Methodology and Results. Stephen Levy, CCSCE Presentation to ABAG Regional Planning Committee April 4, 2012

Economic Impact Study of Habitat for Humanity of McLean County, IL by Landon Hoffman and Diego Mendez Carbajo, Ph.D.

The Entrepreneurship Education Series

FASHION SQUARE EXPANSION PROJECT ENV EIR APPENDIX H URBAN DECAY REPORT

Florida s Financially-Based Economic Development Tools & Return on Investment

Project Proposal Application

CITY COUNCIL File #

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Former Fire Station 47 Site - 24,400 square feet

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE SAN ANTONIO MEDICAL FOUNDATION IN BEXAR COUNTY

Economic Impact. North Dakota University System. in of the. Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report 690. August 2012

Pinellas County Florida. Business Incentive Program

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

MANAGING RISK v. REWARD HOW TO BALANCE CREATIVE DESIGN WITH THE REALITIES OF PROJECT BUDGETS, SCHEDULES & SCOPE. Panel

Economic, Cultural, Tourism and Sustainability Grants Policy Program Goals, Categories, Criteria, and Requirements

BUSINESS INCUBATION COMMUNITY READINESS ASSESSMENT Dalton-Whitfield County. October 17, 2012 Erin Rosintoski

Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission

NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING

RE: Planning Case No: ZA CUB, ENV CE Project Address: 300 S Grand Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90071

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 HOUSE DRH30055-MC-54 (02/05) Short Title: Modify Film Grant Fund. (Public)

Addendum. Final Environmental Impact Report for North Campus Project. California State University Los Angeles SCH# March 2018.

Exhibit 1: Total Estimated Annual Graffiti Abatement Costs in San Francisco, FY

City of Lynwood MODIFIED REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

Community Development Committee Meeting date: December 15, 2014 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of January 14, 2015

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT

Military Economic Impact Analysis for the State of Louisiana

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION of the County of Los Angeles NOFA ROUND 23-B PERMANENT SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING TERM SHEET

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY TIERED DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY CREATIVE ARTS & HOLLOWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT

County Ordinance reads as follows:

Subject: Park Acquisition Opportunity Fund Grant Request for Big Marine Park Reserve (17980 Margo Avenue), Washington County

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of January 24, 2018.

Industry Overview and Projected Employment Growth in Specified Occupations

Economic Impact Report

APPLICATION FOR PARCEL MAP

REPORT. To the Honorable Mayor and City Council From the City Manager. May 9, 2016

Healthy Hospitals. Healthy Communities. The economic impact of Wisconsin s hospitals

PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 5, 2014 CHAVEZ AND SOTO JOINT DEVELOPMENT

Mississippi State University

SECTION 2 INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION

Economic Impact of Hospitals and Health Systems in North Carolina. Stephanie McGarrah North Carolina Hospital Association August 2017

RiNo Park Buildings Business Case Analysis. July 10, 2017

The University of Georgia

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

BRYAN WAGGONER Office: (602) TRACY GLASS. Office: (602)

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION of the County of Los Angeles NOFA ROUND 23-A PERMANENT SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING INITIAL TERM SHEET

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE AND INVESTMENT POLICY

Vision. 7 Business and Economics. Introduction. Statement

The Economic Impacts of the New Economy Initiative in Southeast Michigan

February 18. START-UP NY Campus Plan for Designation of Tax-Free New York Areas

Give your company a competitive advantage in the global marketplace

$1.4 billion and growing. The Economic Impact of Oregon s Urban Research University

UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS. AOA Conference Sacramento, CA January 12, 2014

East Harlem Commercial Opportunity RFP

Economic Analysis of Proposals to Limit the Municipal Bond Market: 501(c)(3) Issuance

City of Santa Monica. Economics at AECOM & Lauren Schlau Consulting. June 9, 2010 Revised October 11, 2010

Oregon New Markets Tax Credit Program

City of Waterloo TechWorks Campus Reinvestment District Final Application for Iowa Reinvestment District

REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF DEFENSE-RELATED SPENDING IN ILLINOIS

THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Evergreen Valley College Campus Forum. April 7, :00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Gullo II

Transcription:

City of Pomona Executive Summary Prepared for: Cal Poly Pomona Foundation, Inc. 3801 W. Temple Avenue, Building #55 Pomona, CA 91768-4038 SRHA Job #1231 11661 San Vicente Blvd. Suite 306 Los Angeles, California 90049-5111 310.820.2680-p, 310.820.8341-f www.stanleyrhoffman.com

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the economic benefits analysis for Innovation Village that is located on a portion of the California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona) campus within the City of Pomona. Innovation Village is developed and managed by the Cal Poly Pomona Foundation, Inc. Included in the analysis are projected annual recurring fiscal benefits to the City of Pomona, such as property taxes and other public revenues to the City of Pomona, projected jobs and payroll and revenue benefits to Cal Poly Pomona. The study also looks at regional economic impacts through the use of an economic model analysis developed through IMPLAN data and software which is owned by MIG, Inc. Project Description Innovation Village is located on the southeastern side of the Cal Poly Pomona campus and includes an estimated 64.85 acres. About 89.4 percent of the total acreage is devoted to private development while the remaining 11.6 percent represents common area, such as roads, landscaping, walkways and other infrastructure, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 Site Map Cal Poly Pomona Foundation 1 Site Map Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. 1

Table 1 Existing and Future Land Uses Acres Building Square Feet Floor Area 1 Existing and Future Land Land Use Percent Percent Amount Amount Ratio 1 Uses of Total of Total Existing Tenants American Red Cross 15.11 23.3% 213,000 20.8% 0.32 Center for Training, Technology and Incubation (CTTi) 3.91 6.0% 46,783 4.6% 0.27 Southern California Edison (SCE) 6.67 10.3% 123,000 12.0% 0.42 Southern California Edison (SCE) 6.36 9.8% 123,000 12.0% 0.44 Southern California Edison (SCE) 6.64 10.2% 123,000 12.0% 0.43 Existing Tenant Subtotals 38.68 59.6% 628,783 61.3% 0.37 Future Tenants Parcels B, C, and D - Corner Parcel 2 14.45 22.3% 336,217 32.8% 0.53 Parcel E - R&D Parcel 3 4.2 6.5% 60,000 5.9% 0.33 Future Tenant Subtotals 18.65 28.8% 396,217 38.7% 0.49 Common Area 7.52 11.6% n/a n/a n/a Total 4 64.85 100.0% 1,025,000 100.0% 0.41 1. The total FAR calculation excludes the 7.52 acres of common area. 2. This parcel is located at the northwest corner of Valley Boulevard and Temple Avenue; the proposed aggregate square footage is 350,000 as shown for three separate buildings in Figure 1. 3. This parcel is located on the northwest corner of Valley Boulevard and Kellogg Drive and is shown with a proposed 60,000 square feet in Figure 1. 4. The total building square footage is calculated based on a reduction of 13,783 square feet to the buildings on parcels B, C, and D. The square footage has been reduced to achieve the total building square footage entitlement for Innovation Village of 1.025 million square feet. Sandra Vaughan-Acton, Director, Real Estate Development, Cal Poly Pomona Foundation Square Feet. Existing and future potential development square footages at Innovation Village are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. Existing development at Innovation Village totals an estimated 628,783 square feet and includes seven office and research buildings. The site includes three buildings for the Center for Training, Technology and Incubation (CTTi) (46,783 square feet), three Southern California Edison office buildings (123,000 square feet each) and the American Red Cross regional facility (213,000 square feet). As shown in Figure 1, potential sites for development include Parcels B, C, and D for office space and Parcel E which is currently a parking lot but is being considered for Research and Development (R&D) space. Also shown in Table 1, development on the currently vacant land would potentially add an estimated 396,217 square feet of office and research and development space to the currently undeveloped parcels for a total of 1,025,000 square feet at buildout. Jobs. Based on a survey of the various tenants at Innovation Village, the Cal Poly Pomona Foundation staff provided job estimates by various occupational categories for each employer. The overall regional economic impacts from direct on-site activities at Innovation Village, including indirect and induced impacts, were estimated using the MIG IMPLAN input-output model. Direct on-site jobs are based on employees working at Innovation Village. Indirect jobs are suppliers, contractors, and other types of employment resulting from activity at Innovation Village. Induced jobs are based primarily on consumption of products and services from wages Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. 2

earned by the Innovation Village employees. Such consumption could include spending in retail stores, restaurants, gas stations, entertainment and personal services. Both indirect and induced job impacts do not necessarily occur in Pomona, but rather have a regional impact. Estimated existing, future and total jobs after buildout are presented in Figure 2. Direct jobs constitute about 47 percent of the total job impact, while indirect jobs represent about 24 percent of the total jobs. The remaining estimated induced jobs represent about 30 percent of total jobs generated. Existing Jobs. Total existing jobs, including direct on-site, and the associated indirect, and induced jobs, are estimated at 4,574 jobs. Direct jobs, or jobs located within Innovation Village, are estimated at 2,174. The resulting indirect jobs are estimated at 1,041, while induced jobs are estimated at 1,359. Future Jobs. Total future jobs after buildout, including direct, indirect, and induced jobs, are estimated at 3,073 jobs. Direct jobs are estimated at 1,400, indirect jobs at 767 and induced jobs at 906. Total Jobs after Buildout. Total jobs are estimated at 7,647after buildout of Innovation Village. Direct jobs are estimated at 3,574, indirect jobs are estimated at 1,807 and the remaining induced jobs are estimated at 2,265. Figure 2 Estimated Jobs Impacts Existing, Future and Total Development 2 Estimated Job Impacts 9,000 8,000 7,000 Induced Jobs Indirect Jobs Direct Jobs 7,647 6,000 2,265 29.6% 5,000 4,000 3,000 4,574 1,359 1,041 29.7% 22.8% 3,073 906 29.5% 1,807 23.6% 2,000 1,000 2,174 47.5% 767 1,400 25.0% 45.6% 3,574 46.7% 0 Existing Development Future Development Total Development MIG IMPLAN Input-Output Model Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. 3

Public Fiscal Benefits The three major service providers to Innovation Village are Cal Poly Pomona, the City of Pomona, and the County of Los Angeles. Innovation Village is located on land leased to the Foundation by Cal Poly Pomona and the university provides many of its public services. This relieves the local jurisdictions or special districts of much of the cost of providing local public services. Fiscal impacts after buildout are based on the estimated jobs and valuation for Innovation Village. Property taxes, property tax in-lieu of vehicle license fees (VLF) and business license taxes account for about 80 percent of total projected recurring revenues. Other projected recurring revenues include sales tax, franchise fees, utility users tax, and fines and forfeitures. The only projected costs for the City General Fund are fire protection and general government overhead. City General Fund costs are not projected for police, community development and public works because these services are provided by Cal Poly Pomona. Also, City General Fund costs are not projected for community services and library services because the fiscal analysis assumes that these services are generally provided to residents; there is no residential development planned at Innovation Village. Projected Recurring Fiscal Impacts. Table 2 summarizes the recurring fiscal impacts to the City General Fund from Innovation Village. After buildout of Innovation Village, a recurring surplus of about $958,520 is projected. The projected surplus after buildout is based on projected recurring revenues of about $1.21 million and recurring costs of $249,342 for fire protection and general government after buildout. A recurring surplus of $512,561 is projected to the City General Fund for existing development based on recurring revenues of $662,511 and recurring costs of $149,950. Recurring revenues for future development are projected at $545,351 and recurring costs are projected at $99,392, resulting in a projected recurring surplus of $445,959 for future development. Local and Regional Economic Impacts The local and regional economic impacts from the activities in the Innovation Village associated with existing and proposed development are projected using the IMPLAN input-output model. Labor Income Impacts. An aggregate labor income of $602.0 million is estimated from the combined effects of the direct, indirect and induced jobs at project buildout, as shown in Figure 3. About 60 percent of this income is generated from existing development with the remaining 40 percent generated from the proposed future development. Economic Output. As also shown in Figure 3, the current economic output of Innovation Village, including direct, indirect, and induced impacts, is estimated at about $731.3 million. The total economic output at buildout for Innovation Village is estimated at about $1.2 billion. About 59 percent of the output is generated by existing development, while the remaining 41 percent is estimated to be generated by future development. Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. 4

Existing Future Total Category Development Development after Buildout A. Valuation and Property Tax 2 Valuation $109,653,043 $99,054,250 $208,707,293 Total Annual Property Tax $1,096,530 $990,543 $2,087,073 B. Pomona General Fund Annual Fiscal Impacts Annual City General Fund Revenues 1 Table 2 Projected Recurring Fiscal Impacts to Pomona General Fund (In Constant 2017 Dollars) Projected Recurring Fiscal Property Tax $255,709 $230,993 $486,702 Property Tax - In Lieu of VLF 154,611 139,666 294,277 Sales Tax 25,938 0 25,938 Business License Tax 96,737 88,845 185,582 Franchises (without water/sanitation) 25,718 17,047 42,765 Utility Users Tax (without water) 92,591 61,372 153,963 Fines and Forfeitures 11,207 7,428 18,635 Impacts to Total Annual Recurring Revenues $662,511 $545,351 $1,207,862 Annual City General Fund Costs 2 General Government $7,412 $4,913 Pomona General Fund $12,325 Fire Department 142,538 94,479 237,017 Total Annual Recurring Costs $149,950 $99,392 $249,342 Annual Recurring Surplus $512,561 $445,959 $958,520 Note: 1. Only annual recurring revenues relevant to Innovation Village are projected to the City General Fund. 2. Only fire protection and general government overhead costs are projected for Innovation Village. Police protection, planning services and public works services are provided by Cal Poly Pomona to Innovation Village. Los Angeles County Auditor-Controller, FY 2016-17 Modified ATI Ratio Report, 09/08/16 City of Pomona, 2016-2017 Adopted Operating Budget Cal Poly Pomona Foundation, Inc. Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. 5

Figure 3 Estimated Aggregate Labor Income and Economic Output (Constant 2017 Dollars) $1,400,000,000 $1,200,000,000 Future Development Existing Development TOTAL OUTPUT = $1.23 billion $1,000,000,000 $498,196,560 40.6% $800,000,000 TOTAL LABOR INCOME = $602 million $600,000,000 $400,000,000 $240,729,010 40.0% $731,282,442 59.4% $200,000,000 $360,952,496 60.0% $0 3 Estimated Aggregate Labor Income and Economic Output MIG IMPLAN Input-Output Model Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. 6

Construction Spending Impacts Jobs and income outcomes for the direct construction, and the regional indirect and induced impacts, are estimated based on the IMPLAN model over a 5-year construction period. Jobs Impacts. As shown in Table 3, total construction-related jobs impacts are based on the total valuation (spending) of $83.8 million for the proposed future development. The total direct jobs associated with the construction valuation are estimated at 600 full-time jobs for the 5-year construction period, or 120 full-time construction jobs on an annualized basis. Other regional indirect and induced employment impacts result in another 282 jobs over the 5-year construction period or about 56 jobs on annualized basis. Aggregate Labor Income. As also shown in Table 3, the total construction-related spending of $83.8 million for the proposed future development results in about $50.9 million in total aggregate labor income over the 5-year construction period, or about $10.2 million on an annualized basis, for the combined direct, indirect and induced impacts. Table 3 Construction Employment Impacts for Future Development (In Constant 2017 Dollars) 3 Construction Employment Impacts for Future Development 5-year Annualized Category Cumulative Estimates 2 Estimated Future Valuation Construction ($) $83,752,350 $16,750,470 Construction-Related Employment 1 Construction 600 120 Regional Indirect and Induced 282 56 Total Construction-Related Employment 882 176 Construction-Related Employment Labor Income 2 Construction $34,010,888 $6,802,178 Regional Indirect and Induced $16,894,304 $3,378,861 Total Construction-Related Employment Payroll $50,905,192 $10,181,038 Note: 1. Jobs generated by construction-related activities are based on the valuation of new construction which are analyzed for their direct, indirect and induced impacts using the IMPLAN input-output model. 2. Aggregate labor income obtained from the estimated IMPLAN input-output model construction impacts. MIG IMPLAN, Los Angeles County, 2015 Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. 7

Revenue Impacts on Cal Poly Pomona Cal Poly Pomona primarily receives revenues from leases to non-university tenants of Innovation Village. As shown previously, current tenants include the American Red Cross, Southern California Edison and various small companies leasing at CTTi. Lease Revenues. Net lease revenues for American Red Cross and Southern California Edison are based on existing lease rates per square foot of land; net lease revenues for CTTi are based on existing lease rates per building square foot. Future lease revenues include those from potential future development based on an estimated monthly market lease rate of $0.115 per square foot of land in 2016-2017. This price per square foot is escalated at a minimum rate of 2 percent per year. As summarized in Table 4, Innovation Village currently generates about $1.4 million in annual lease revenue from existing tenants. For this analysis, it was assumed that development on Parcels B, C, D, and E would begin in 2019-2020, with full buildout on these parcels spread evenly over five years and not expected until 2023-2024. At this hypothetical buildout, future annual lease revenue totals about $2.9 million escalated at a minimum rate of 2 percent per year from 2016-2017. Existing buildings comprise about 56 percent (about $1.6 million) of the total revenue at buildout. Future potential revenue on Parcels B, C, D, and E comprises about 44 percent (about $1.3 million) of the total revenue at buildout. Figure 4 and Figure 5 further display the projected change in lease revenues at Innovation Village for existing and future buildings from 2016-2017 to 2023-2024. Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. 8

Table 4 Lease Revenue at Hypothetical Buildout 1 4 Lease Revenue at Building 2016-17 Lease Revenue Percent Distribtion 2023-24 Lease Revenue Percent Distribtion Panel A. Existing Buildings Land Lease Revenues $1,162,380 82.3% $1,343,069 46.0% CTTi $249,992 17.7% $287,163 9.8% Subtotal Existing Buildings Lease Revenue $1,412,372 100.0% $1,630,232 55.9% Panel B. Future Buildings Parcels B, C, and D 2 $0 0.0% $997,990 34.2% Parcel E 2 $0 0.0% $290,013 9.9% Subtotal Future Buildings Lease Revenue $0 0.0% $1,288,003 44.1% Hypothetical Buildout Panel C. Total Estimated Lease Revenue Existing Buildings $1,412,372 100.0% $1,630,232 55.9% Future Buildings $0 0.0% $1,288,003 44.1% Total Lease Revenues $1,412,372 100.0% $2,918,235 100.0% 1. Lease revenues are shown for 2016-2017 and escalated annually by 2 percent until 2023-2024. 2. It was assumed that development on Parcels B,C,D, and E would begin in 2019-2020, with a hypothetical full buildout on these parcels spread evenly over five years and not expected until 2023-2024. Net annual revenues for Parcels, B, C,D, and E are based on a monthly ground lease rate of $0.115 per square foot in 2016-2017 which is estimated to increase at a minimum rate of 2 percent per year. In 2019-2020, the monthly ground lease rate is estimated at $0.122 and continues to increase at a minimum rate of 2 percent per year. Sandra Vaughan-Acton, Director, Real Estate Development, Cal Poly Pomona Foundation Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. 9

Figure 4 Lease Revenue Projections for Existing Buildings: 2016-2024 $3,000,000 Southern California Edison American Red Cross CTTi $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,412,372 $1,439,531 $1,476,551 $1,490,680 $1,538,139 $1,574,365 $1,614,938 $1,630,232 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Note: Lease revenues are increased at a factor of 2 percent annually for Figures 4 and 5 Cal Poly Pomona Foundation, Inc. 4 Lease Revenue Projections for Existing Buildings: 2016-2024 Figure 5 Lease Revenue Projections for Existing and Future Buildings: 2016-2024 $3,500,000 Future Tenants Existing Tenants $3,000,000 $2,918,235 $2,625,137 $2,500,000 $2,317,158 $2,000,000 $1,728,663 $2,023,624 $1,500,000 $1,412,372 $1,439,531 $1,476,551 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Cal Poly Pomona Foundation, Inc. 5 Lease Revenue Projections for Existing and Future Buildings: 2016-2024 Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. 10

Economic Overview of the San Gabriel Valley Also included in this report is a summary of economic trends in the San Gabriel Valley and their relation to the City of Pomona. As Innovation Village positions itself to attract future tenants, it is important to monitor growth opportunities in the regional economy. This will enable the Village to attract new technology oriented private sector investment on its developable land. The following summarizes key economic trends, with further analysis in Appendix B. Overall, the Health Care/Services industry has the strongest outlook in the San Gabriel Valley with 122,500 individuals employed in the sector which is expected to continue to grow in the future; this trend is being driven by an aging population, retiring baby boomers, increased life expectancy, employment growth, and healthcare reform While Professional and Business Services has not quite reached its pre-recession level of 90,330 jobs, it has steadily increased from its low of 80,635 jobs since 2011 to an estimated 90,000 jobs in 2015 Overall, both the industrial and office real estate markets have performed relatively well in the San Gabriel Valley, along with the industrial market particularly enjoying recent success The largest sectors by share of San Gabriel Valley in the City of Pomona include Educational Services (14 percent), Health Care and Social Assistance (13 percent), Manufacturing (11 percent) and Retail Trade (10 percent), together comprising nearly half of all the jobs Relative to San Gabriel Valley, the City of Pomona has a large concentrations in the Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation, Transportation and Warehousing, Educational Services, and Manufacturing sectors Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. 11

Other Benefits In addition to lease revenues and taxable sales, there are other tangible and intangible benefits to both Cal Poly Pomona and the City of Pomona. The research park s access to intellectual capital at Cal Poly Pomona has the potential to expand into further economic activity. Economic benefits include collaboration between Cal Poly faculty and Innovation Village businesses, as well as the hiring of current Cal Poly Pomona students for internships, and in turn, the hiring of future graduates as full-time employees. It was estimated in 2014 that Southern California Edison (SCE) had hired 52 student interns (29 percent of total internship class) and that 8 of those student interns (21 percent of total intern hires) were eventually hired by SCE into full-time positions. Overall, the creation of diverse jobs with higher average wages and skill sets would help form an attractive research and engineering environment in Pomona. In conjunction with conferences and other collaboration opportunities between Innovation Village tenants, Cal Poly Pomona faculty and students and outside businesses, economic activity would flow back into the campus community in the form of additional taxable sales. Also, there could be increased economic activity from the use of overnight lodging facilities, catering services, and other support services that are nearby, but outside of Innovation Village. Such collaboration opportunities may further lead to joint grant applications and eventually take the form of patents and new business ventures. Consultations with Cal Poly Pomona faculty on future engineering and technical job requirements may also influence the formation of university curriculum, further enriching campus resources. Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. 12