NGA Staff Analysis: Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) August 2012

Similar documents
Summary of. Overview. existing law. to coal ash. billion in FY. funding in FY 2013 FY 2014

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

Federal Financing of Transportation in Texas

The FAST Act: Update on Surface Transportation Legislation. December 16, 2015

TRANSPORTATION. The American County Platform and Resolutions

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs

Please complete your phone connection now:

Statewide Performance Program (SPP) Interstate and National Highway System (NHS) Pavement

POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

SAFETEA-LU s IMPACTS ON ODOT MARCH 2006

Division A Federal Aid Highways And Highway Safety Construction Programs

Funding Principles. Years Passed New Revenue Credit Score Multiplier >3 years 0% % % % After Jan %

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

Navigating MAP 21. Securing Federal Funding for Community Walking & Biking Projects

DCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015

MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions

2018 Call for Projects Guidebook

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

DOT FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR TRANSPORTATION ASSETS

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of Enacted February 17, 2009

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Transportation and the Federal Government

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B

Overview of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program

Making the MOST. of MAP-21. A Guide to the 2012 Federal Transportation Law And How to Use it for Positive Change in Your Community

MAP-21: An Analysis. The Trust Fund

Iowa DOT Update 2016 APWA Fall Conference JOHN E. DOSTART, P.E.

Falling Forward: A Guide to the FAST Act

Brownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, What is FHWA?

WELCOME TO THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY

AMERICA BIKES SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAMS SAFETEA LU VS. MAP 21

STIP. Van Argabright November 9, 2017

2016 DOT Discretionary Grants

Non-Motorized Transportation Funding Options

GDOT & Federal-Aid Highway Financing

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)

August 3, Laura Mester Chief Administrative Officer Michigan Department of Transportation

Sources of Funding for Transit in Urban Areas in Texas Final report PRC

Stimulus Funding and Transportation

TRANSPORTATION. All levels of government should cooperate in setting minimum standards for highway improvements.

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Deval Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lieutenant Governor Jeffrey B. Mullan, Secretary of Transportation and Chief Executive Officer

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

Table to accompany Insight on the Issues 39: Policy Options to Improve Specialized Transportation

Innovative Project Finance

LPA Programs How They Work

The FAST Act: New Department of Transportation Tribal Self-Governance Program and Tribal Transportation Provisions

Transportation Improvement Program. Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department

LAP Manual 7-1 February 2014 Compliance Assessment Program Requirements

6. HIGHWAY FUNDING Introduction Local Funding Sources Property Tax Revenues valuation County Transportation Excise Tax

Funding the Federal-Aid Highway Program

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

Overview of Presentation

Transportation Improvement Program for Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties, Indiana for

Module 2 Planning and Programming

Memorandum. Date: May 13, INFORMATION: Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-Aside Implementation Guidance (Revised by the FAST Act)

GAO HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Further Efforts Needed to Address Data Limitations and Better Align Funding with States Top Safety Priorities

Transportation. Fiscal Research Division. March 24, Justification Review

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

Transportation Improvement Program FY

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century

SMART SCALE Policy Guide

DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION REPORT ON AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

APPENDIX 5. Funding Plan

Section Policies and purposes

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

RULES CONCERNING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM

Section 6. The Transportation Plan

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

Draft MAPA FY2019-FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program

Section 6 Federal Programs

TIGER & FASTLANE: AN INSIDE LOOK AT NEW OPPORTUNITY

APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT

Missoula Urban Transportation Planning Process Public Participation Plan Prepared by

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS DISASTER RECOVERY

A Field Guide. Local Program Opportunities

Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2018 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly.

Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for

The FAST Act: Implications for the African-American Community

A Field Guide. Local Program Opportunities

FY 2015 Value Pricing Pilot Program Discretionary Grant Program

HB2 Quick Guide To view the latest version of the HB2 Policy Guide:

2018 Project Selection Process. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

The Future of the Federal Role in Transportation

Transcription:

NGA Staff Analysis: Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) August 2012 On July 6, the President signed H.R. 4348, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) into law. MAP-21 is a 27-month, $105 billion highway and transit authorization bill (H.R. 4348). Highlights for states include: The new authorization provides $37.5 billion (FY13) and $37.8 billion (FY14) in contract authority for formula apportionment to the states. The new authorization preserves the traditional 80-20 split between highways and transit funding. Transit formula grants would total $8.5 billion (FY13) and $8.6 billion (FY14). The law also authorizes $500 million for FY13 for projects of national and regional significance. The new authorization consolidates by two-thirds the number of highway programs from about 90 to 30. It also preserves the ability of states to transfer up to 50 percent between core federal-aid programs, for which NGA advocated. Additionally, it changes the required suballocation to a 50-50 split between localities, based on population size, and the state, rebalanced from the previous 62.5-37.5 split. The new authorization expands the capacity of the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) credit assistance program, which NGA supported, and increases its authorization from $122 million annually to $750 million in FY13 and $1 billion in FY14. The new authorization includes reforms to federal project delivery rules including certain categorical and de minimus project cost exclusions from environmental clearance requirements, integrating planning documents into the environmental impact statement process, and budget penalties to federal agencies that fail to meet approval deadlines. The authorization transfers $2.4 billion from the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund to the Highway Account of the Highway Trust Fund. The bill also transfers $18.8 billion from the general fund to the Highway Trust Fund, offset by pension law changes over 10 years. The new authorization does not include certain provisions for tax-exempt bonds supported by NGA including continuing the small issuer exemption, temporary Alternative Minimum Tax exclusion on interest earned from certain tax-exempt bonds, and an increased volume cap for sewer and water bonds. The authorization also does not include separate freight or rail provisions proposed in earlier versions. The agreement encourages, rather than requires, states to develop state freight plans. No changes to current truck size and weight provisions are included in the new authorization, but a new study and inventory of current state laws is required. * * * If you have questions or need additional information, please contact David Parkhurst (dparkhurst@nga.org).

MAP-21 Overview: [Relevant section numbers from the Act are in brackets] Program Restructuring MAP-21 restructures core highway formula programs. Activities carried out under some existing formula programs the National Highway System Program, the Interstate Maintenance Program, the Highway Bridge Program, and the Appalachian Development Highway System Program are incorporated into the following new core formula program structure: National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Transportation Alternatives (TA) Metropolitan Planning Authorizations [1101] MAP-21 extends current law and funding levels through September 30, 2012, with new provisions for FY 2013 and beyond taking effect on October 1, 2012. Total funding levels adjusted for inflation are set at $40.9 billion from the Highway Trust Fund for FY 2013 and $41.0 billion for FY 2014. In the case of public transit, MAP-21 provides $10.6 billion in FY 2013 and $10.7 billion in FY 2014. Obligation limitation [1102] 1 MAP-21 establishes an annual obligation limitation of $39.7 billion for FY 2013 and $40.3 billion for FY 2014 for the purpose of limiting total highway spending each year. Authorization levels are indicated as the amount that could be spent in each program, while the obligation limit is the overall authority to spend federal funds for projects annually. Distribution of the limitation among core programs is similar to current law. Funding for the following programs is exempt from the limitation: Emergency Relief ($100 million annually for the emergency relief fund) Demonstration projects from ISTEA and earlier authorization acts (specified) Minimum Allocation (ISTEA) $639 million per year of Minimum Guarantee (TEA-21) $639 million per year of Equity Bonus (SAFETEA-LU) in FY 12 only $639 million per year of National Highway Performance Program funds (MAP-21) Apportionment formulas [1105] The approach to distribution of formula funds under the Act is now based on the amount of formula funds each state received under SAFETEA-LU. For FY 2013 and FY2014, the amount each state receives will be based on their share of apportionments for FY 2012. However, in FY 2014, the amounts will be adjusted to ensure that no state receives less than 95 cents of every dollar it contributed to the Highway Account of the HTF. Once each state s total Federal-aid apportionment is calculated, amounts are set aside for Metropolitan Planning and CMAQ based on the relative size of the state s FY 2009 apportionment of those programs. The remaining funds are then divided as follows: NHPP (63.7 percent), STP (29.3 percent), and HSIP (7 percent). A state may transfer up to 50 percent of any apportionment to another formula program, except no transfers are permitted of Metropolitan Planning funds or funds 1 The January 1 sequestration will cut programs funded through the General Fund by 7.6 percent unless Congress acts to postpone or eliminate the sequester. The sequestration will not affect programs funded through contract authority from the Highway Trust Fund.

suballocated to areas based on population (Surface Transportation Program and Transportation Alternatives). TIFIA [2002] MAP-21 increases annual funding available for TIFIA from $122 million to $750 million in FY 2013 and $1 billion in FY 2014. MAP-21 also makes some program reforms including a 10 percent set-aside for rural projects and a rolling application process. The Act also changes the evaluation criteria for projects, with creditworthiness becoming the dominant factor in selection, and provides funds on more of a firstcome, first-served basis. In addition to providing project-by-project credit assistance, it allows credit assistance to be provided for a program of projects through a master credit agreement. The Act also increases the maximum share of project costs that TIFIA may provide from 33 percent to 49 percent. Tolling [1512] Tolling is now permitted on new Interstates and added or new lanes on existing Interstates, which was previously allowed only under certain pilot programs. The Interstate System Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Pilot Program is continued, which allows tolling of all lanes on an existing Interstate highway for reconstruction or rehabilitation. The Act eliminates the requirement that public authorities execute a toll agreement with FHWA before tolling a facility under the mainstream tolling programs. Highway Trust Fund Additional funds are provided to maintain solvency of the HTF through transfers from the General Fund and from the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund. Revenue raisers are included that will offset the transfers made to the HTF. MAP-21 extends the imposition of the highway-user taxes, generally at the rates that were in place when the legislation was enacted, through September 30, 2016. Authority to expend from the HTF and Mass Transit Account for programs under the Act and previous authorization acts is provided through September 30, 2014. Transportation Planning [1201 and 1202] Requirements for a long-range plan and a short-term transportation improvement plan (TIP) continue, with the long-range plan to incorporate performance plans required by the Act for specific programs. The Secretary is required to establish criteria for the evaluation of the new performance-based planning processes. The process will consider whether states developed appropriate performance targets and made progress toward achieving the targets. Five years after enactment of MAP-21, the Secretary is to submit to Congress reports evaluating the overall effectiveness of performance-based planning and the effectiveness of the process in each state and for each Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). Performance Management [1203] The Secretary, in consultation with states, MPOs, and other stakeholders, will establish performance measures for pavement conditions and performance for the Interstate and NHS, bridge conditions, injuries and fatalities, traffic congestion, on-road mobile source emissions, and freight movement on the Interstate System. Within one year after the Secretary has established performance measures, each state must set its own performance measures. Within four years of enactment and every two years thereafter, states must submit to the Secretary a report on their progress in achieving these targets. If a state s report shows inadequate progress in some areas, the state must undertake corrective actions. In addition, MAP-21 requires that each state maintain minimum standards for Interstate pavement and NHS bridge conditions. If a state falls below either standard, that state must spend a specified portion of its funds for that purpose until the minimum standard is exceeded. Accelerating Project Delivery [1301-1323]

MAP-21 sets deadlines for decision making in the environmental review process (ERP), with a process for issue resolution and referral, and penalties for federal agencies that miss the deadlines. Projects stalled in the environmental review process can get technical assistance to speed completion within four years. MAP-21 also expands the usage of categorical exclusions (CEs) from the NEPA ERP to a variety of other types of projects, including multi-modal projects, projects in a declared disaster, projects within existing operational right-of-way, and projects receiving limited Federal assistance. MAP-21 also broadens the ability of states to acquire or preserve right-of-way for a transportation facility prior to completion of the NEPA review process. Additionally, it makes permanent the Surface Transportation Project Delivery Pilot Program and allows all states to assume federal responsibilities under NEPA for one or more highway, railroad, public transportation, or multimodal projects. Major Programs National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) [1106] Under MAP-21, the National Highway System (NHS) is composed of approximately 220,000 miles of rural and urban roads. States are required to develop a risk- and performance-based asset management plan for the NHS to improve or preserve asset condition and system performance; plan development process must be reviewed and recertified at least every four years. The penalty for failure to implement this requirement is a reduced Federal share for NHPP projects in that year (i.e. 65 percent rather than 80 percent). If Interstate conditions in a state fall below the minimum set by the Secretary, the state must devote a portion of NHPP and STP funds to improve conditions. MAP-21 establishes the minimum standard for NHS bridge conditions if more than 10 percent of the NHS bridges in a state is on structurally deficient bridges, the state must devote a portion of NHPP funds to improve conditions. Surface Transportation Program (STP) [1108] Most current STP eligibilities are continued, with some additions and clarifications. Activities of some programs that are no longer separately funded are incorporated into STP, including transportation enhancements, recreational trails, ferry boats, truck parking facilities, and Appalachian Development Highway System projects. Fifty percent of a state s STP funds are to be distributed to areas based on population, with the remainder to be used in any area of the state. Also, a portion of a state s STP funds (equal to 15 percent of the State s FY09 Highway Bridge Program apportionment) is to be set aside for off-system bridges, unless the Secretary determines the state has insufficient needs to justify this amount. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) [1112] MAP-21 continues the HSIP and every state is required to develop a Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). A state that fails to have an approved plan will not be eligible to receive additional obligation limitation during the redistribution of unused obligation limitation. States will set targets for the number of serious injuries and fatalities and the number per vehicle mile of travel. If a state fails to make progress toward its safety targets, it will have to devote a certain portion of its formula obligation limitation to the safety program and submit an annual implementation plan on how the state will make progress to meet performance targets. Although MAP-21 eliminates the set aside for High Risk Rural Roads, if the fatality rate on such roads increases for two consecutive years, a state is required to obligate 200 percent of its FY 2009 High Risk Rural Roads set aside. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) [1113] Funding remains available to reduce congestion and improve air quality for areas that do not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter (nonattainment areas) as well as former nonattainment areas that are now in compliance (maintenance areas). States with no nonattainment or maintenance areas may use their CMAQ funds for any CMAQ- or STP-eligible project. The Act does not require a specific percentage of CMAQ funds be suballocated to nonattainment areas versus maintenance areas.

Transportation Alternatives (TA) [1122] MAP-21 establishes a new program to replace the transportation enhancements program. The Transportation Alternatives set aside roughly maintains current law funding (i.e. 10 percent of STP). Fifty percent of TA funds are suballocated by states to areas based on population. States can transfer up to 50 percent of "transportation alternatives" funding to other state programs. States and MPOs will conduct a competitive application process for use of the suballocated funds for urbanized areas with more than 200,000 people. The Recreational Trails program and the Safe Routes to Schools program are also eligible activities. Federal Lands and Tribal Transportation Programs [1119] MAP-21 creates a unified program for Federal lands transportation facilities, Federal lands access transportation facilities, and tribal transportation facilities. The Federal Lands Transportation Program provides $300 million annually and combines the former Park Roads and Refuge Roads programs. The Federal Lands Access Program provides $250 million annually for projects that improve access to the Federal estate on infrastructure owned by States and local governments. The Tribal Transportation Program provides $450 million annually for projects that improve access to and within Tribal lands. Emergency Relief [1107] The Emergency Relief (ER) program is funded by a permanent authorization of $100 million per year. MAP-21 continues the ER program, with some changes in requirements: State must apply and provide a complete list of project sites and costs within two years of the event; cost may not exceed the cost to repair or reconstruct a comparable facility. For emergency repairs, a 100 percent Federal share is allowed during the first 180 days following a disaster. MAP-21 allows the Secretary to extend the time period if access to damaged areas is limited. Debris removal for major disasters declared under the Stafford Act will be funded by FEMA. Projects of National and Regional Significance [1120] MAP-21 authorizes $500 million from the General Fund in FY 2013 only, to fund critical high-cost surface transportation capital projects. States, tribes, transit agencies, and multi-state or multijurisdictional groups of these entities are eligible to apply for competitive grant funding. Research, Technology Deployment, Training and Education MAP-21 continues the authority for states to use apportioned funds for training and other educational activities; this applies to the NHPP, STP, HSIP, and CMAQ. The Federal share for funds used in this manner is 100 percent. MAP-21 continues the State Planning and Research (SP&R), as a two percent takedown of four core programs. [52005]