GOOD PRACTICE IN URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT

Similar documents
THE BETTER ENTREPRENEURSHIP POLICY TOOL

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document. Proposals for a

Jean Monnet Networks (policy debate with the academic world)

KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCES WHAT ARE THE AIMS AND PRIORITIES OF A KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE? WHAT IS A KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE?

The BASREC CCS NETWORK INITIATIVE

Jean Monnet support to associations

MAISON DE L'ECONOMIE EUROPEENNE - RUE JACQUES DE LALAINGSTRAAT 4 - B-1040 BRUXELLES

Actions and strategy for the social economy and social enterprises. The way forward. General Presentation

United Nations Development Programme. Country: Armenia PROJECT DOCUMENT

Growth Hub Summary Document

Horizon 2020 Financial Instruments for the Private Sector, Especially SMEs An Overview

November Dimitri CORPAKIS Head of Unit Research and Innovation DG Research and Innovation European Commission

CAPACITIES WORK PROGRAMME (European Commission C(2009)5905 of 29 July 2009)

Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs DG. Joanna DRAKE. Director for Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Hearing at European Parliament

CAPACITIES WORK PROGRAMME PART 3. (European Commission C (2011) 5023 of 19 July 2011) REGIONS OF KNOWLEDGE

The Guild. Bolstering Europe 1 s innovation ecosystems: Research, creativity, and co-creation

James Cogan PNO Consultants

The European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and the European Investment Advisory Hub (EIAH) - Drivers for the real economy

Worldbank Flickr. Roadmap for Scaling Up Resource Efficiency in Israel

Introduction & background. 1 - About you. Case Id: b2c1b7a1-2df be39-c2d51c11d387. Consultation document

The Helsinki Manifesto We have to move fast, before it is too late.

JOB VACANCY AT EIT FOOD / CLC North-West

The European Research Council Expert Group (ERCEG)

Annex to the. Steps for the implementation

The C40 Cities Finance Facility Information pack for cities

BELGIAN EU PRESIDENCY CONFERENCE ON RHEUMATIC AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES (RMD)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL REGIONAL AND URBAN POLICY

the EU framework programme for research and innovation Chiara Pocaterra

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

The future of innovation in view of the new EU policies: Europe 2020, Innovation Union, Horizon Nikos Zaharis, SEERC December 29, 2011

Community Energy: A Local Authority Perspective

High Level Pharmaceutical Forum

Ty Cambria, 29 Newport Road, Cardiff, CF24 0TP

WORK PROGRAMME 2012 CAPACITIES PART 2 RESEARCH FOR THE BENEFIT OF SMES. (European Commission C (2011)5023 of 19 July)

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Case Study: EU Energy Initiative (EUEI)

Development of Erasmus+ in the second half of the programme period and the design of the subsequent programme generation ( )

Towards faster implementation and uptake of open government

Erasmus + ( ) Jelena Rožić International Relations Officer University of Banja Luka

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Sources of funding for A&A education to deliver the vision of Europe 2020

Citizenergy. Boa Energia. Financial Coordinator Eupportunity, Euppy

Local innovation ecosystems

Declaration on a Pan-European Ecosystem for Innovation and Entrepreneurship

EU funding opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises

URBACT III Programme Manual

The matchfunding model of. CrowdCulture

Latest statistics August 2015

EU measures to support RTD and innovation activities performed by SMEs

A shared agenda for growth: European Commission Services

Review of Knowledge Transfer Grant

advancing with ESIF financial instruments The European Social Fund Financial instruments

4 31 Overview of donor financing by sector 33 Small and medium sized enterprises 35 Legal Transition Programme 36 Economic analysis

SUT. Partnerships and benchmarks for Sustainable Urban Tourism. SUT governance

Access to finance for innovative SMEs

Priorities for exit negotiations

The Ljubljana Charter. Reforming Health Care. 18 June 1996

ENTREPRENEURSHIP. Training Course on Entrepreneurship Statistics September 2017 TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE ASTANA, KAZAKHSTAN

An action plan to boost research and innovation

ACP-EU Water Facility

PPIAF Assistance in Nepal

EFB Position Paper: Fostering Long-Term Entrepreneurship

2 Introduction The DABLAS Task Force was set up in November 2001 to provide a platform of cooperation for the protection of water and water-related ec

Europe's Digital Progress Report (EDPR) 2017 Country Profile Malta

RICARDIS Reporting Intellectual Capital to Augment Research, Development and Innovation in SME s

From FP7 to Horizon 2020

European Business Campaigns Sustainable Living in Cities 14 October Bologna, Italy

"EU-New Zealand cooperation in research and innovation: recent achievements and new opportunities under Horizon 2020"

Governance and Institutional Development for the Public Innovation System

MISSION INNOVATION ACTION PLAN

CEA COMMENTS ON THE CONSULTATION DOCUMENT ON STATE AID FOR INNOVATION

HORIZON The New EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Gaëtan DUBOIS European Commission DG Research & Innovation

GOOD PRACTICE. Leeds City Region Growth Programme

Open Innovation Call

SocialChallenges.eu Call for grants 2 nd Cut-off date

Industrial Strategy Green Paper. Consultation Response Manufacturing Northern Ireland

START-UP VISA CANADA. Strengthening the entrepreneurship ecosystem

Big data in Healthcare what role for the EU? Learnings and recommendations from the European Health Parliament

The Start-up and Scale-up Initiative

Industry and research associations position on EU Institutional Public Private Partnerships in Research and Innovation

The Creation of an E-Zone for Europe s Innovators, Entrepreneurs and Investors. 22 December 2014

REFLECTION PROCESS on CHRONIC DISEASES INTERIM REPORT

European. More research and innovation. Special December European Commission DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY

Over a number of years the Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes Programme has explored ways to improve lake water quality for the Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes.

International Cooperation in Horizon 2020 Transport R&I area

REGIONAL UNIVERSITIES NETWORK (RUN) SUBMISSION ON INNOVATION AND SCIENCE AUSTRALIA 2030 STRATEGIC PLAN

Social entrepreneurship and other models to secure employment for those most in need (Croatia, October 2013)

Operational Programme Entrepreneurship and Innovations for Competitiveness Regional Office of CzechInvest for South Moravia region

Europe's Digital Progress Report (EDPR) 2017 Country Profile Lithuania

This project is funded by the European Union

MULTI-ANNUAL WORK PROGRAMME FOR GRANTS IN THE AREA OF COMMUNICATION 1 PERIOD COVERED:

Frequently Asked Questions

R&D Update. Feedback on R&D Reform. Key themes of our feedback on R&D reform: Stability. Access. Modernisation. Control

RDP analysis: Measure 16 Cooperation M Other forms of cooperation

Horizon 2020 update and what s next. Dr Alex Berry, European Advisor 15 December 2015, Royal Holloway

Capacity Building in the field of youth

The Europe INNOVA Eco-innovation Platform. Orsola Mautone DG Enterprise and Industry Unit D.2 Support for Innovation

Horizon SME Instrument

INTERREG ATLANTIC AREA PROGRAMME CITIZENS SUMMARY

Transcription:

GOOD PRACTICE IN URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT DESSIN policy brief #1 Designing governance and financing regimes to encourage innovation uptake A guide for water managers and policy makers New technology is a key element in tackling challenges faced in urban water management, such as poor water quality and increased water scarcity. New approaches are more likely to turn into real innovations (actually implemented and taken up by the market) if there is evidence of their benefits or added value in economic, environmental and social terms. This brief provides a series of five recommendations on governance design factors conducive to innovation uptake. It is targeted to water managers and policy makers aiming to create enabling environments for innovation uptake. The FP7 DESSIN project, funded by the European Union, responds to this requirement by demonstrating and promoting innovative water solutions. The project is built around five demonstration sites across Europe, where these solutions are being tested and validated. DESSIN is also developing a methodology to value ecosystem services (ESS) improvements associated with the uptake of these technologies, thus enhancing the evidence base of the multiple benefits of tested innovations.

1 GOOD PRACTICE 1: ESTABLISHING A STABLE AND HOMOGENEOUS POLICY FRAMEWORK Continuity in public policy and financing streams is known to be important for long term business planning, and innovations are supported by strategies that provide investment security to innovators. A stable, clear and transparent regulatory environment helps innovators identify opportunities and strengthen the confidence in future returns on investment. environmental targets of the EU Water Framework Directive or the EU Bathing Water Directive have contributed to direct investment towards more sustainable forms of urban water management. Other non- regulatory examples include policies of national or regional importance such as the Culture of Excellence in the Danish water sector or the Green City Initiative in Aarhus. Regulations and policies may act as strong motivators in innovation development and uptake: it is important, therefore, that they provide the right incentives to foster sustainable innovations. Clear objectives in the regulatory and policy framework can provide strong supporting rationales for innovation development and uptake. For example, the Currently, urban water management in Europe is characterised by a complicated policy framework where standards, ownership, and responsibilities vary widely between countries. Greater coherence and clarity could foster faster innovation transfer and create economies of scale. Example 1: The role of the Master Plan and Future Convention in the Emscher The Emscher catchment is situated in the Ruhr Valley, home to the German industrial revolution and one of the most densely populated areas in Europe. There, the Water Framework Directive stimulated investments regarding rainwater decoupling from the urban wastewater network to improve water quality and restoration efforts to improve the ecological quality of rivers. Regionally, two umbrella plans, the Masterplan Emscher Future and the Future Convention for Stormwater, were instrumental in promoting a common and clear political vision regionally. They contributed to building trust, enthusiasm, and optimism, so that change and ambitious projects could succeed. One successful example is the creation of 24 ha lake and meadows on the site of an old steel factory which now serves as a flood retention basin and as an ecological hotspot. More information can be found at: http://www.eglv.de/en/waterportal/emscher- conversion.html 2 GOOD PRACTICE 2: DESIGNING SUPPORTING FINANCIAL INCENTIVES AND OPPORTUNITIES National and European rules and financing streams have a clear influence on the choice and design of innovations locally. Including targets, eligibility or selection criteria to ensure delivery of multiple ecosystem services could significantly influence local investments. The application of charges on water use can increase the uptake of water efficient technologies, while the application of discharge fees can incentivise investment in pollution abatement technologies. For example, a discharge fee based on sealed land was used in the Emscher valley to boost private rainwater decoupling investments. Private financing is an important source of funding in urban water management. A wide range of instruments exists to finance infrastructures in urban water management and could be considered to foster sustainable innovation uptake. 2

Alternative strategies can be used to finance innovation uptake. For example, to create Lake Phoenix in the Emscher valley, extensive funding was generated from the private market thanks to the marketing of newly built real estate on the shore of the lake. Additional sources of private funding could be exploited if the benefits and ecosystem services delivered by an innovation are clearly identified and quantified. Examples of financing options for urban water management innovations Private finance Instruments Examples Loan and credit Microfinance Loans and credits are debts provided by one entity to another accompanied by an interest rate. Microfinance provides small amounts of money at a lower interest than under other funding schemes. Oldest and most common sources of financing (e.g. European Investment Bank) Offered by micro- finance institutions across Europe, e.g. Adie in France or Finnvera in Finland. Equity investment Venture capital Equity investment is the practice of buying a fraction of a company in the form of equities. Venture capital is a form of equity investment mostly used when a project does not manage to attract capital in public markets. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development provides equity investments for private water companies. Mostly used in North America. In Europe, examples include Vento and Aqua Resources Fund. See the Private Equity & Venture Capital Association web- site for more information. Insurance and guarantee Insurance is the transfer of the risk of loss from one entity to another in exchange for payment. A guarantee is an agreement serving as security for the formal pledge to pay another person s or company s debt. A range of insurances are available worldwide. Guarantees are not frequently used in the water sector. Crowdfunding Crowdfunding is the practice of funding a project or venture by raising many small amounts of money from a large number of people, typically via the internet. Several platforms exist such as Kickstarter and Indiegogo. More information can be found at: https://dessin- project.eu/?page_id=32 3 GOOD PRACTICE 3: ENCOURAGING THE DEVELOPMENT OF PARTNERSHIPS Many actors are relevant to innovation uptake in urban water management: water service providers, policy makers, national regulatory agencies, local government planners, civil society, water users, professional associations, financial institutions, etc. Building trust is important, and innovation uptake can benefit from more exchange between relevant actors. Several projects in Europe and Australia have for example promoted the role of Learning Alliances or Shadow Networks to foster informal debates on problems and potential solutions between stakeholders. They allow actors to get to know each other and facilitate relationship building. Aligning perspectives and seeking consensus are ideal objectives; however, in cases of innovation uptake reviewed in DESSIN, searching for multiple benefits and allowing for compromises were the key to success. Linking potential benefits and ecosystem services delivered by innovations with their key beneficiaries or the priorities of relevant actors can help create broad coalitions for innovation uptake. 3

Example 2: Seeking compromise in the Emscher One of the key success factors for the realisation of Lake Phoenix in the Emscher was the successful linking of different actors, goals and ambitions. Most eminent example in this respect is the compromise that had to be made regarding the actual size of the lake. Conflicts occurred between actors wanting to maximise real estate opportunities and other actors pledging for a bigger size of the lake to ensure its ecological viability and maximise its attractiveness and flood protection potential. Relational management, and the shared wish for a successful project, meant that eventually all actors involved were willing to find mutually acceptable compromises. More information can be found at: http://www.eglv.de/en/waterportal/emscher- conversion/the- new- emscher/emscher- impulse/phoenix- lake.html Creating closer partnerships is critical for success. A feeling of joint ownership of the innovation uptake should in particular be created, where partners are able to influence its design and implementation. This requires also giving significant thought to the adequate partnership structure and to the allocation of responsibilities. Example 3: Flexible task sharing between Aarhus municipality, Aarhus water, and consultants In Aarhus, the municipality had a conscious strategy to nurture relations with the selected consultants in order to ensure joint ownership. The collaboration was organised as a partnering contract between the involved public and private organisations with shared responsibility for the process and final results. This allowed a level of flexibility and resulted in a process open for adjustments and changes that was critical for success. Technical management, for example, shifted between organisations during the project. The partnering approach allowed building capacity in all organisations during the lifetime of the project. More information can be found at: http://www.prepared- fp7.eu/prepared- arhus- denmark 4 GOOD PRACTICE 4: SETTING UP MULTIPLE COMMUNICATION CHANNELS TO REACH OUT TO THE BROADER PUBLIC Innovations are often expensive and complex to introduce in existing systems. Any major change usually requires a strong rationale and broad support. Communication is crucial to build legitimacy and public interest in innovation uptake, and therefore ultimately, political support. Example 4: Strengthening the innovation business water sector in Zaragoza Zaragoza has formalised its approach to the development of water innovations through an institutionalised fora of firms, research institutions and local and regional administrations called ZINNAE. Its purpose is to consolidate the city as a setting for knowledge, demonstration and experimentation for the efficient use of water, in order to enable local companies to become more competitive. ZINNAE is based on the idea that the potential for innovation and economic development is unlocked through strong partnership between university, industry and government in the production, transfer and applica- tion of knowledge. More information can be found at: http://zinnae.org/ 4

5 GOOD PRACTICE 5: FOSTERING KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND CAPACITY BUILDING Building knowledge on the development of the innovation and its implementation is often recommended. This may require phasing inno- vation uptake, for example through a period of testing and experimenting with new ideas. Pilot, demonstration sites or feasibility studies should thus be promoted. Their design should take into account the potential controversial nature and maturity of the innovation. Identify- ing and quantifying which benefits and ecosys- tem services can be delivered may help obtain the support of potential beneficiaries of the innovation. Example 5: Using multiple communication channels in Zaragoza Innovation uptake in Zaragoza relied heavily on an effective communication campaign over several years organised through the Water Saving City Programme. The Programme started in 1997 with an awareness- raising campaign targeted to households, scaled up in 2000 to other sectors, such as public buildings, parks and gardens, industries and the service sector. Good practices were identified and disseminated, and more than 10.000 pocket guides were distributed among the city s major water consuming sectors. Between 2006 and 2008, the Zaragoza water saving city: 100,000 commitments intended to sign more than 25,000 entities, institutions or citizens in adopting at least 4 certified actions on water use. Zaragoza hosted the International Exhibition Water and Sustainable Development in 2008 with 200 lectures and educational events. The municipality has also developed a self- explaining water bill in order to make the invoicing more transparent. More information can be found at: http://www.zaragozaconelagua.org/ 6 FOR MORE INFORMATION These recommendations were developed as part of DESSIN, and are based on literature research and analysis of recent cases which have witnessed successful innovation uptake in their urban water management: Aarhus in Denmark, the Emscher catchment in Germany, and Zaragoza in Spain. Another brief was prepared targeted to water innovators (technological companies and water utilities). Please visit the FP7 DESSIN project website: https://dessin- project.eu. 5 This brief was written by Rouillard, J. and Vidaurre, R. (Ecologic Institute) with contributions from Gerner, N. (Emschergenossenschaft); Damman, S. (SINTEF); Riegels, N. (DHI); Brouwer, S. (KWR); Termes, M. and Antorán Ponce, A. (CETaqua). The brief was designed by Vargova, B. (Ecologic Institute).