ELECTRONIC INTELLIGENCE (ELINT) AT NSA

Similar documents
U.S. Air Force Electronic Systems Center

MEMORANDUM. BASE OPS/ International Spy Museum. Operation Minute by Minute. 01 October, 1962 (time travel skills required)

CHAPTER 4 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT CAPABILITIES Mission. Elements of Intelligence Support. Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) Electronic Warfare (EW)

Naval Electronic Warfare Solutions Ensuring your mission success.

Detect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats. Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

US Military Space Organizations

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162

Chapter 5. Intelligence & Counterterrorism DHS. The Intelligence Community (IC) Intelligence Activities. Intelligence Activities (cont.

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

Introduction to Homeland Security

Defense Support Program Celebrating 40 Years of Service

Appendix A. Annex N Space

Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM

Defense Daily Open Architecture Summit EMS Panel

AGI Technology for EW and AD Dominance

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

SERIES 1300 DIRECTOR, DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING (DDR&E) DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING (NC )

C4I System Solutions.

RC-135V/W RIVET JOINT

MCWP Electronic Warfare. U.S. Marine Corps PCN

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

The Cruise Missile Threat: Prospects for Homeland Defense

The Verification for Mission Planning System

Trusted Partner in guided weapons

mm*. «Stag GAO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE Information on Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and Other Theater Missile Defense Systems 1150%

Serving as specialists in cyber communications CRYPTOLOGY TECHNICIAN

The Necessity of Human Intelligence in Modern Warfare Bruce Scott Bollinger United States Army Sergeants Major Academy Class # 35 SGM Foreman 31 July

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

aselsan EW SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT

CTT CAREER PATH (IW/SW/AW/SG/NAC/EXW)

STATEMENT J. MICHAEL GILMORE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

MAINTAINING GLOBAL VIGILANCE

SPS-TA THALES AIRBORNE SYSTEMS INTEGRATED SELF-PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR TRANSPORT AND WIDE-BODY AIRCRAFT.

KEY NOTE ADRESS AT ASSOCIATION OF OLD CROWS

Challenges and opportunities Trends to address New concepts for: Capability and program implications Text

Reconsidering the Relevancy of Air Power German Air Force Development

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures

Chapter 13 Air and Missile Defense THE AIR THREAT AND JOINT SYNERGY

STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD P. FORMICA, USA

Strong. Secure. Engaged: Canada s New Defence Policy

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9

Space Capabilities indispensable at the strategic, operational as well as the tactical level of war.

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. Unclassified

Director, Intelligence and Security Research Center George Mason University

Arms Control Today. U.S. Missile Defense Programs at a Glance

Russian defense industrial complex s possibilities for development of advanced BMD weapon systems

EC-130Es of the 42nd ACCS play a pivotal role in the course of an air war. The Eyes of the Battlespace

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Introduction to Homeland Security. The Intelligence Community (IC) Director of National Intelligence (DNI) National Intelligence Coord.

Subj: REQUIRED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY AND PROJECTED OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT STATEMENTS FOR FLEET AIR RECONNAISSANCE SQUADRON SEVEN (VQ-7)

ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNIQUES. December 2014

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

ISR Full Crew Mission Simulator. Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Capabilities for Airborne and Maritime Live Mission Training

The Joint Force Air Component Commander and the Integration of Offensive Cyberspace Effects

Innovation in Military Organizations Fall 2005

4677 th DEFENSE SYSTEMS EVALUATION SQUADRON

OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENS E (PUBLIC AFFAIRS )

S ea Control Squadron (VS) 21 was deactivated at NAF Atsugi,

CRS Report for Congress

Military Radar Applications

GAO. OVERSEAS PRESENCE More Data and Analysis Needed to Determine Whether Cost-Effective Alternatives Exist. Report to Congressional Committees

Spectrum contest: RAAF boosts electronic warfare capabilities

Update on SwAF replacement of Air Surveillance, Air Defence Sensors and ground based naval sensors

RC-135U Combat Sent. Headquarters U.S. Air Force. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

COUNTER-RADIO-CONTROLLED IMPROVISED-EXPLOSIVE-DEVICE EWSYSTEMS

By Cdr. Nick Mongillo. Photography by Erik Hildebrandt

April 01, 1986 New Evidence on 1986 US Air Raid on Libya

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 31 R-1 Line #27

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

The USAF Weapons School at Nellis AFB, Nev., prepares its students to take the force through combat.

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

USAF Gunship Precision Engagement Operations: Special Operations in the Kill Chain

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

We are sending copies of this report to the Secretaries of Defense and the Air Force.

Enlisted Information Dominance Warfare Specialist (EIDWS) Common Core

Analysis of Interface and Screen for Ground Control System

Agile Archer. The skies over Key West, Fla., fill with Eagles, Hornets, Tigers, and Fulcrums for a joint exercise. Photography by Erik Hildebrandt

The Patriot Missile Failure

FM AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY BRIGADE OPERATIONS

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

What future for the European combat aircraft industry?

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

David Child-Dennis MODERN NAVAL RULES FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY 1

Behind the Scenes of Intelligence Resourcing

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

LESSON 2 INTELLIGENCE PREPARATION OF THE BATTLEFIELD OVERVIEW

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF

Joint Space Mission Areas

IV. Organizations that Affect National Security Space

Transcription:

ELECTRONIC INTELLIGENCE (ELINT) AT NSA

Cover Photos: From top to bottom, US Air Force advanced ELINT airborne collection platform; early GRAB satellite; Cold War ELINT signals analysis equipment. This publication is distributed FREE by the National Security Agency. If you would like additional copies, please submit your request to: Center for Cryptologic History National Security Agency 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6886 Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6886

ELECTRONIC INTELLIGENCE (ELINT) at NSA Richard L. Bernard Center for Cryptologic History National Security Agency 2009

This publication is a product of the National Security Agency history program. It presents a historical perspective for informational and educational purposes, is the result of independent research, and does not necessarily reflect a position of NSA/CSS or any other US government entity.

Background What is Electronic Intelligence (ELINT)? ELINT is information derived primarily from electronic signals that do not contain speech or text (which are considered COMINT). It is divided into major branches. One branch is Technical ELINT (TechELINT), which describes the signal structure, emission characteristics, modes of operation, emitter functions, and weapons systems associations of such emitters as radars, beacons, jammers, and navigational signals. A main purpose of TechELINT is to obtain signal parameters which can define the capabilities and the role that the emitter plays in the larger system, such as a ground radar locating aircraft, and thus lead to the design of radar detection, countermeasure, or counterweapons equipment. The overall process, including operation of the countermeasures, is part of electronic warfare. Another major branch is Operational ELINT (OpELINT), which concentrates on locating specific ELINT targets and determining the operational patterns of the systems. These results are commonly called Electronic Order of Battle (EOB). OpELINT also provides threat assessments, often referred to as tactical ELINT. OpELINT intelligence products support military operational planners and tactical military commanders on the battlefield. A former third major branch of ELINT is the collection, processing, and reporting of foreign telemetry signals intelligence (TELINT). TELINT is technical and intelligence information derived from the intercept, processing, and analysis of foreign telemetry. At one time Telemetry Intelligence was considered a branch of ELINT since TELINT (later to be called FISINT Foreign Instrumentation Signals Intelligence) activities are closely related to TechELINT procedures and were conducted by all of the Department of Defense (DoD) military departments. TELINT is a critical source of performance information on foreign missiles 1

and space vehicles while they are being developed and tested. TELINT can also provide much operational information on foreign satellites and space vehicles. Electronic Intelligence (ELINT) at the National Security Agency (NSA) did not have an easy start. When NSA was formed in 1952, consideration was given to including ELINT as well as COMINT as part of NSA s charter. It is widely believed that Lieutenant General Ralph Canine, USA, Director of NSA at that time, felt that managing the DoD COMINT efforts would be enough of a challenge for NSA. This attitude toward ELINT was shared by the DoD military departments none wanted NSA to manage ELINT; each department was very content to manage its own interests in ELINT. Department of Defense ELINT, however, was as much in need of coordination and management as COMINT. In particular, the effort badly needed a cohesive signal analysis and processing effort. Lieutenant General Ralph Canine, USA, first Director of NSA 2

The Start of Modern ELINT ELINT had its start in World War II with the invention and use of radar by the Allies and the Axis. The initial Allied ELINT efforts were started by the British; they are described in the book The Secret War by Dr. R. V. Jones. The US Army Air Forces had a keen interest in ELINT since most of the German radars at the time were used to target Allied bombers over Germany, and the air forces wanted to know as much about them as possible including how to evade, jam, or spoof the radars. During WWII the US military departments all used ELINT very effectively against German ground radars and against Japanese airborne, shipborne, and submarine radars. One of the early 1943 Army Air Force ELINT missions was flown by a B-24 over Kiska Island in the Aleutian Islands to electronically map the Japanese radars then on the island. In 1944 large numbers of B-24s were outfitted with ELINT receivers, which were used to guide jamming of the German ground radars in Europe. Soon after WWII, the USAF in Europe (USAFE) embarked on an aggressive TechELINT and OpELINT program, including establishing a solid and expansive cooperative program with several NATO partners. In 1952 the US DoD set up the Army-Navy Electronics Evaluation Group (ANEEG) to be housed at the Navy s Nebraska Avenue Naval Security Station (NSS) by coincidence the headquarters of NSA at the time staffed with about thirty people. The ANEEG had only informal coordinating collection powers, but it was both a centralized analysis point for processing and analysis of ELINT intercepts and a focal point for coordination of difficult ELINT analytic problems. In 1955, as ELINT processing problems grew, ANEEG was redesignated the National Technical Processing Center (NTPC), under the USAF Air Staff, and administratively was designated 3

Naval Security Station (NSS) at Nebraska Avenue in Washington, DC, home of the NTPC AFCIN-Z; it was housed in Building 20 at the Naval Security Station in Washington, DC. In addition to Army and Navy participation, the NTPC had key participants from the USAF and from the CIA. CIA at that time was operating the U-2 airborne reconnaissance program, and it led the integration of U-2 data into NTPC signal processing efforts. The U-2 had ELINT signal collection packages as well as photographic sensors. Direction for NSA to Manage DoD ELINT Starting in 1954, a number of presidential-level committees recommended that ELINT be brought under NSA s purview. Both the Mark Clark Subcommittee of the Hoover Commission in 1954 and the William O. Baker Committee in 1957 made such a recommendation. Dr. Baker was a major influence in having US ELINT efforts managed by NSA. Strongly backed by President Eisenhower, the Baker Committee s efforts culminated in the issuance of National Security Council Intelligence Directive (NSCID) No. 6, Communications Intelligence and Electronics Intelligence, in early 1958. 4

Dr. William O. Baker NSCID No.6 gave NSA many ELINT powers. Within DoD it was implemented in early 1959 by an updated 1955 DoD Directive S-3115.2 and focused DoD top management review within DDR&E, soon to be headed by Dr. Eugene Fubini, a staunch supporter of ELINT and of having NSA manage DoD ELINT. It gave NSA (with certain exceptions) operational and technical control of all US DoD ELINT activities. The directive made it quite clear that the Joint Chiefs of Staff, component commanders, and the military departments and services were to fully support these NSA-managed ELINT activities. ELINT Management Begins at NSA One of the first actions taken in response to the DoD ELINT directive in March of 1959 was to incorporate the National Technical Processing Center into the NSA Collection and Signal Analysis (COSA) organization as the Non-communications Signals Analysis and Processing Division. By 1959, NTPC had about 100 people. This signal processing and analysis group formed the core of the NSA effort at that time. Some of the DoD military departments and combat commands were not greatly enthusiastic about NSA s new responsibilities, and as a result many management problems and effective coordination procedures developed. The Strategic Air Command (SAC) was long accustomed to doing ELINT business their way, which was tailored to fulfill their mission. SAC soon developed a productive and cooperative set of arrangements with NSA. 5

NSA Fort Meade complex in the 1960s SAC had an extremely active ELINT program using RB-47 aircraft (the reconnaissance version of the B-47 bomber) to probe Soviet aircraft defenses in order to get information to protect SAC s fleet of B-52 bombers. All of the SAC B-52s were soon protected with radar warning receivers based on ELINT information. In 1960, two major overseas ELINT processing centers became integral parts of the overall DoD ELINT structure NSA developed. These centers processed and analyzed data primarily from the US military departments ELINT collection assets. In 1974 the USAF Europe sponsored programs with NATO partners and was fully integrated into the NSA system. Later this effort was combined with the NSA engineering support office in Europe. Now-closed STONEHOUSE deep space TELINT facility 6

NSA built and deployed or sponsored many ELINT and TELINT signal collection systems during the 1960s. A ring of sophisticated systems was developed and deployed in the TELINT area to gather information on the missile development and space activities of the Soviet Union. Since the early 1960s, NSA had been a participant in the NRO and US Navy-led GRAB and POPPY efforts to collect ELINT on Soviet air defense radar signals from an orbiting satellite. Intelligence from GRAB and POPPY provided the location and capabilities of Soviet radar sites and ocean surveillance information to the US Navy and for use by the USAF. This effort provided significant ELINT support to US forces throughout the war in Vietnam. One of NSA s new responsibilities was to prepare a National ELINT Plan (NEP) in coordination with the ELINT community at that time. The first plan was completed in 1963 Early GRAB satellite for ELINT signal collection from ground radars under NSA leadership with the participation of the US military departments, the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), DIA, and CIA. Several plans followed. Another response by NSA related to the expansion of NSA ELINT responsibilities was the creation in 1967 of a special group called DAGER, the Director s Advisory Group on ELINT and Reconnaissance. It was a small group headed by Mr. Charles Tevis, who originated the idea and was a strong proponent and technical leader of NSA s stewardship of ELINT. 7

In the late 1960s during the Vietnam War, ELINT played a major role: many military airplanes were outfitted with warning receivers and jamming equipment to counter the North Vietnamese antiaircraft guns and surface-to-air missile sites provided to North Vietnam by the Soviets. This radar warning and associated jamming equipment significantly reduced US aircraft losses. One of the key aircraft used was the Navy A-3 SKYWARRIOR, which could be aircraft-carrier-based. When configured for electronic warfare, it was designated EA-3B. EA-3B ELINT and electronic warfare aircraft The EA-3B was particularly effective against the Soviet-built SA-2 surface-to-air missile systems which targeted US fighters and bombers over North Vietnam. The EA-3Bs remained in service until the early 1990s and served around the world as ELINT and electronic warfare aircraft; they were based on land and on carriers. The aircraft were used in the 1991 Gulf War and helped target Iraqi antiaircraft missile systems for allied air-to-ground missile destruction. In the early 1970s a joint National Reconnaissance Organization (NRO) and NSA field ELINT processing center was opened. This joint effort added NSA s expertise in signal processing 8

SA-2 Guideline groundto-air missile system and its reporting responsibilities to NRO activities, provided many collection and processing advantages, and improved timely reporting of NRO collection results. Expansion of NSA ELINT Responsibilities In 1971 the Collection and Signals Analysis organization, elements of the Research and Development organization, and other SIGINT operational elements merged to form the Electronic Intelligence and Systems Management Group. This group provided a good institutional base for NSA to manage ELINT, including collection activities and the development of new collection and processing systems for ELINT efforts. Similarly, it created a cohesive way to develop the ELINT portion of the Combined Cryptologic Program (CCP) program and budgets with the DoD military departments. One of the offices in the group concentrated on TechELINT, one on OpELINT, and one on TELINT. TELINT attained its status as a separate INT in 1971 with the publication of the revised DoD Directive 5100.20, which gave NSA its updated charter. TELINT activities were focused in the NSA organization as the Advanced Weapons and Space Systems Office within the new group. By the early 1970s NSA had completed a network of groundbased foreign telemetry collection facilities and worked with the 9

DoD military departments and services to develop aircraft and shipborne TELINT signal collection facilities. National Security Council Intelligence Directive No.6 was updated in 1972 and retitled Signals Intelligence (SIGINT). This directive gave NSA even more ELINT powers. Based on NSCID 6 concepts, SIGINT within DoD had been implemented by Department of Defense Directive 5100.20, issued in 1971 and commonly referred to as the NSA Charter. The DoD Directive charged NSA with the responsibility of managing SIGINT within DoD and specifically defined SIGINT as including COMINT, ELINT, and TELINT. As previously mentioned, the term TELINT has fallen into disuse and has been replaced by the term FISINT, which includes telemetry, missile and satellite command signals, and beacons. TELINT signal collection position in early 1970s During the Cold War years, NSA continued to sponsor or participate with the DoD military departments, the National Reconnaissance Office, and the CIA in the development of sophisticated signal collection equipment for target signals to keep pace with the ever-changing technology of those signals. One of the premier ELINT data collection platforms is a modified US Air Force RC-135U aircraft. The primary function of these 10

Now-closed 1970s missile and space TELINT facility TechELINT specially configured aircraft is ELINT reconnaissance and surveillance. They collect, analyze, and sometimes locate foreign target electronic signals to help determine detailed operating characteristics and capabilities. They have been in operation, with a continuing series of advanced configurations, since 1964. Modified RC-135U advanced ELINT airborne collection platform 11

Another long-time ELINT collection platform is the US Army GUARDRAIL aircraft. This aircraft is configured to locate enemy fire control radars and thus provide OpELINT. The aircraft can fly near or over a battlefield and communicate directly with Army and Air Force units. The GUARDRAIL collection and related analysis and reporting efforts have served in conflicts starting with the Vietnam War through DESERT STORM in 1991. RC12 GUARDRAIL COMINT and ELINT collection platform During the Cold War many technological advances were made in ELINT collection and analysis equipment. These advances made increased capabilities possible with more reliable configurations and by consuming less electrical power. As the state-of-the-art of foreign radar and other electronic equipment advanced, ELINT receivers had to keep pace. One such receiver, developed in the 1970s for both ground site and airborne use, was the QRC-259. Some thirty to forty receiver systems were deployed and operated into the 1990s. NSA also continued to modernize and expand its ELINT signals processing and analysis equipment positions. The Agency likewise upgraded positions at selected field facilities with emphasis on more timely reporting of ELINT results. NSA also developed and operated special-purpose telemetry processing equipment, often computer-based, in the National Telemetry Processing Center (using the abbreviation NTPC). 12

QRC-259 ELINT signal receiver developed in the 1970s Different types of equipment sets were needed to process and analyze different forms of telemetry used by various telemetry transmission equipment. One example is RISSMAN, a specialpurpose telemetry processing system used at NSA during the Cold War. RISSMAN, a special-purpose telemetry processor 13

Cold War ELINT signals analysis equipment set operated at NSA Summary Starting in 1958, and working with other US and allied ELINT organizations, NSA technical and management initiatives and expertise have made significant intelligence gains for the United States and its allies. These gains provided vital intelligence information for use by electronic warfare equipment designers and operating personnel. They also provided critical information on foreign missiles and space vehicles that were a threat to the United States. NSA continues today in its role as the lead US organization for ELINT matters. About the Author Richard Bernard is a consultant and volunteer in the NSA Center for Cryptologic History (CCH). He has held a number of ELINT planning, engineering, and operational positions at NSA. He has been a member of the Association of Old Crows, an electronic warfare technical association, since 1979. 14