Cortes Residence NDP Initial Assessment Letter; Project No ;Sap No ; Navajo Community Plan Area

Similar documents
The Development Services Department [DSD] has conducted a Completeness Review of the abovereferenced

1222 First Avenue, San Diego, CA Cycle Distributed: 07/08/2013

1222 First Avenue, San Diego, CA Cycle Distributed: 08/24/2015

Guide to Rezoning. Step 1. Step 2. Step 5. Step 6. Step 7. Step 8

coordination and collaboration between St. Mary s College and the Town of Moraga

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended

General Plan Referral

1222 First Avenue, San Diego, CA Cycle Distributed: 05/22/2012

Request for Proposals. On-Call General Engineering Services. Public Works Department City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403

City of Lynwood MODIFIED REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

RESOLUTION NO. -- The applicant, PPF OFF 100 West Walnut, LP ("Applicant"),

CITY OF ORANGE LOCAL CEQA GUIDELINES

Bureau of Waste Management

4:00 p.m. on May 6, 2016

Public Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Impact Report

Agenda Item No. October 14, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

City of Signal Hill Wireless Communications Facility Application

November 20, 2017 PUBLIC NOTICE

Nob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT KYLE BUTTERWICK, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BRAD FOWLER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Subdivision Presubmittal Conference Submittal Package Cover Page

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL & HOUSING AUTHORITY

Master Land Use Instructions B Abutting Owner=s Notification Los Angeles City Planning Department

APPLICATION PROCEDURE TO OPERATE A COMMERCIAL CANNABIS BUSINESS IN CULVER CITY

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 1

PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION

Planning Board Submission Process and Instructions

General Permit Registration Form for the Discharge of Stormwater and Dewatering Wastewaters from Construction Activities

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT

COUNCIL Fl LE NO._~r...;:O::;,.. -..!: :O:;...,_O~fk =--- COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. ~

Standard Operating Procedures for Processing Municipal and Residual Waste General Permit Applications. Bureau of Waste Management

Existing Site Issues & Site Certification. Presented By: Jim Bush President, School Site Solutions, Inc. (916)

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE. July 16, Leake Avenue Post Office Box 4313 New Orleans, Louisiana Baton Rouge, Louisiana

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 2

2018 SAFE, CLEAN WATER PROJECT A2 - WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH GRANT PROGRAM PROCEDURAL GUIDANCE AND REQUEST FOR PROJECT PROPOSALS

EXCAVATION & FILL PROCEDURE 1

NABET Criteria for Food Hygiene (GMP/GHP) Awareness Training Course

Section F: Committee of Adjustment: Minor Variance and Consent Applications

MDUFA Performance Goals and Procedures Process Improvements Pre-Submissions Submission Acceptance Criteria Interactive Review

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE

Guidance and Instructions for the Implementation of Land Disturbing Activities on Fort Jackson

M E M O R A N D U M. The Project and the items that the Commission will be considering at the June 15 th, 2010 meeting are summarized below.

Request for Proposals. April 7, 2014

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES PACIFICA LIBRARY PROJECT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER ACKNOWLEDGED INFO COMMENT

Request for Proposals Architectural Services Re: Fremont High School (RFP No date advertised July 17, 2014) ADDENDUM No. 2 (AUGUST 7, 2014)

BERKS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1238 COUNTY WELFARE ROAD, SUITE 200 LEESPORT, PA (610) FAX (610)

COUNTY OF VENTURA ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPLEMENT TO THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES

General Plan Land Use Amendment

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.4 STAFF REPORT June 21, Staff Contact: Peyman Behvand (707)

OPERATING PERMITS FAQs

2011 SURVEY OF MUNICIPAL REGULATIONS AND FIRE CODE REGULATIONS AFFECTING CHILD CARE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY

Fresno County Little Bear Solar Project EIR SCOPING MEETING Thursday, September 14, :30 pm - 7:30 pm

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT GRANT PROGRAM CALL FOR APPLICATIONS

Greenways, Trails and Recreation Program (GTRP)

Plan of Development Review Process County of Henrico, Virginia

May 18, 2016 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES

MICHAEL N. FEUER CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE:

Chester County Vision Partnership Grant Program January 2017

TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH PROTOCOL FOR ESTABLISHING TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES

Department of Toxic Substances Control

PRESENTER: Chris Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer

Subject: Request for Proposal Route 99 Interchanges at Hammett Road and Kiernan Avenue

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT 7400 LEAKE AVE NEW ORLEANS LA September 17, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW INFORMATIONAL PACKET WHAT IS A DISCRETIONARY REVIEW? WHEN CAN A DISCRETIONARY REVIEW BE FILED?

Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 330 Distel Circle, Los Altos, CA Issued: Friday, January 27, 2017

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of January 24, 2018.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA 300 Richards Blvd. DEPARTMENT

NEW MEXICO FINANCE AUTHORITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT PLANNING FUND PROJECT MANAGEMENT POLICIES

APPLICATION FOR PARCEL MAP

2017 Developer Handbook

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING SERVICES

Determination. Reception: Deborah Kartiganer, Esq.

LARGE PROJECT AUTHORIZATION

District Office Building Seismic Retrofit At Contra Costa Community College District 500 Court St. Martinez, CA March 21, 2016

ELEVATE GRANTS DOWNTOWN FACADE GRANT PROGRAM

PUBLIC BEACH & COASTAL WATERFRONT ACCESS PROGRAM. NC Department of Environmental Quality Division of Coastal Management

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CONSULTING EXECUTIVE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT HOPKINS LANE BIKE & PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

COALINGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION

Your Development Project and the Public Works Department Part

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

COUNTY OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS (TYPICAL)

I. Preliminary Data Management and Fee Processing (Administrative Staff)

ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET

The services shall be performed at appropriate sites as described in this contract.

ATTACHMENT 1 PROJECT APPLICATION FORM. Water Conservation Research Project Title

Attachment 15 Page 1 of 5

CSU Dominguez Hills & DH Foundation University Village-Mixed-Use Development/Market Rate Housing LETTER OF INVITATION REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

BERKS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1238 COUNTY WELFARE ROAD, SUITE 200 LEESPORT, PA FAX

Revised January 6, The Park Master Planning Process

Planning Commission Motion No HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2014

BDWW-GP-1 Number Fish Habitat Enhancement Structures N Days 43. BDWM-GP-6 BDWM-GP-7 Agricultural Minor Road Crossings and Ramps N 43

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For Design Services for New Fire Station

Londonderry Finance Department

Transcription:

June 3, 2015 Takeshi Hosokawa Heckel Hosokawa Architects LLP 1725 South Escondido Blvd, Suite C Escondido, CA 92025 Dear : Subject: Cortes Residence NDP Initial Assessment Letter; Project No. 416650;Sap No. 24005726; Navajo Community Plan Area The Development Services Department has completed the initial review of the project referenced above, and described as a Neighborhood Development Permit for the construction of a 3,326 square feet 2-story single family residence on an individual lot less than 15,000 square feet containing steep hillsides located at 6455 1/3 Normal Lane. The 0.27 acre site is in the RS-1-4 zone within the Navajo Community Plan Area Enclosed is a Cycle Issues Report (Enclosure 1) which contains review comments from staff representing various disciplines and outside agencies. The purpose of this assessment letter is to summarize the significant project issues and identify a course of action for the processing of your project. If any additional requirements should arise during the subsequent review of your project, we will identify the issue and the reason for the additional requirement. To resolve any outstanding issues, please provide the information that is requested in the Cycle Issues Report. If you choose not to provide the requested additional information or make the requested revisions, processing may continue. However, the project may be recommended for denial if the remaining issues cannot be satisfactorily resolved and the appropriate findings for approval cannot be made. The Development Services Department will generally formulate a formal recommendation for your project subsequent to completion of the following milestones: 1) After the City Council recognized Community Planning Group has provided a formal project recommendation; 2) After all City staff project-review comments have been adequately addressed; and 3) During the final stages of the environmental review process. As your Development Project Manager, I will coordinate all correspondence, emails, phone calls, and meetings directly with the applicants assigned Point of Contact. The addressee on this letter has been designated as the Point of Contact for your project. Please notify me if you should decide to change your Point of Contact while I am managing this project.

Page 2 I. REQUIRED APPROVALS/FINDINGS - Your project as currently proposed requires the processing of: Required approval: Process 2 Neighborhood Development Permit Required Findings: In order to recommend approval of your project, certain findings must be substantiated in the record. Enclosure 2 contains the required findings. II. SIGNIFICANT PROJECT ISSUES: The significant project issues are summarized below. Resolution of these issues could affect your project. Additional explanation is provided in the Cycle Issues Report. KEY ISSUES: Drainage: There are site design issues related to the drainage points of the rock-lined drainage swale. Revise drainage swale per LDR-Engineering comments. Slope analysis: Staff requires an increase in the area of the slope analysis to include the adjacent lots to complete their analysis. Please include a revised slope analysis in your resubmittal. Encroachments into easements: Staff has identified structures (decks and caisons) that encroach into the sewer easement. The project will need to be modified to remove this encroachment. Street Tree: A street tree is required along the right of way; reference Landscape comments. III. IV. STUDIES/REPORTS REQUIRED: A biological technical report is required. Please provide 3 copies at resubmittal. Reference the attached Submittal Requirements Report (Enclosure 3). PROJECT ACCOUNT STATUS: Our current accounting system does not provide for real-time information regarding account status, however, our records show approximately $1497.96 billed to date. This amount does not include the current review. During the processing of your project, you will continue to receive statements with the break-down of staff charges to your account. Should you have questions about those charges, please feel free to contact me directly. V. TIMELINE: Upon your review of the attached Cycle Issues Report, you may wish to schedule a meeting with staff and your consultants prior to resubmitting the project. Please telephone me if you wish to schedule a meeting with staff. During the meeting, we will also focus on key milestones that must be met in order to facilitate the review of your proposal and to project a potential timeline for a hearing date. Your next review cycle should take approximately 20 days to complete.

Page 3 Municipal Code Section 126.0114 requires that a development permit application be closed if the applicant fails to submit or resubmit requested materials, information, fees, or deposits within 90 calendar days. Once closed, the application, plans and other data submitted for review may be returned to the applicant or destroyed. To reapply, the applicant shall be required to submit a new development permit application with required submittal materials, and shall be subject to all applicable fees and regulations in effect on the date the new application is deemed complete. If you wish to continue processing this project, please note that delays in resubmitting projects and/or responding to City staff s inquiries negatively impact this Department s ability to effectively manage workload, which can lead to both higher processing costs and longer timelines for your project. VI. RESUBMITTALS/NEXT STEPS: Resubmittals are done on a walk-in basis. Please check in on the third floor of the Development Service Center (1222 First Avenue). Please be prepared to provide the following: A. Plans and Reports: Provide the number of sets of plans and reports as shown on the attached Submittal Requirements Report. The plans should be folded to an approximate 8 ½ x 11 inch size. B. Cycle Issues Report response letter: Prepare a cover letter that specifically describes how you have addressed each of the issues identified in the Cycle Issues Report and any issues identified in this cover letter, if applicable. Or, you may choose to simply submit the Cycle Issues Report, identifying within the margins how you have addressed the issue. If the issue is addressed on one or more sheets of the plans or the reports, please reference the plan, sheet number, report or page number as appropriate. If it is not feasible to address a particular issue, please indicate the reason. Include a copy of this Assessment Letter, Cycle Issues Report and your response letter if applicable, with each set of plans. C. Deposit Account: Our most recent records show that there is a balance of $6502.04 in the deposit account for your project. However, please be advised that the cost of this review has not been posted to your account, and it may take four to six weeks to post these charges to the account. Statements are mailed to the Financially Responsible Party for this project on a monthly basis. If an invoice is attached to this letter, you will need to pay the invoice prior to resubmitting your project. Additional deposits can be made online through Open DSD by entering your project number in the Project ID field: http://opendsd.sandiego.gov/web/approvals/. Invoices can be paid online by searching for the invoice number: http://opendsd.sandiego.gov/web/invoices/ or in person at the Cashier, located on the 3 rd Floor of the Development Services Center.

Page 4 Open DSD: To view project details online, visit: http://www.sandiego.gov/development-services/opendsd/. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE AN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT, THEN: D. San Diego County Clerk Fee: The San Diego County Clerk now requires $50.00 to post the required public notice informing the public that a draft environmental document has been prepared. A check made out to the San Diego County Clerk for this amount will be required prior to the distribution of the draft environmental document for public review. IF YOUR PROJECT IS DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA, THEN: E. If your project has been determined to be Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); a Notice of Exemption (NOE) will be filed with the County Clerk after your project approval and all appeal periods have been exhausted. The County requires a $50 documentary handling fee to file a CEQA NOE. Prior to scheduling your project for a decision, a check payable to the San Diego County Clerk in the amount of $50 must be forwarded to my attention. Please include your project number on the check. A receipt for this fee and a copy of the NOE will be forwarded to you after the 30-day posting requirement by the County Clerk. F. Records Fee: Prior to scheduling your project for a decision you must pay the Records Fee to cover the cost of imaging and archiving your complete project record electronically (see Information Bulletin 503). I will notify you as the project approaches completion the amount required for the Records Fee. VII. COMMUNITY PLANNING GROUP: Staff provides the decision maker with the recommendation from your locally recognized community planning group. If you have not already done so, please contact Matthew Adams, Chairperson of Navajo Community Planners, Inc., at navajoplanners@cox.net to schedule your project for a recommendation from the group. If you have already obtained a recommendation from the community planning group, in your resubmittal, if applicable, please indicate how your project incorporates any input suggested to you by the community planning group. Information Bulletin 620, Coordination of Project Management with Community Planning Committees (available at http://www.sandiego.gov/development-services), provides some valuable information about the advisory role the Community Planning Group. Council Policy 600-24 provides standard operating procedures and responsibilities of recognized Community Planning Committees and is available at http://www.sandiego.gov/city-clerk/officialdocs/index.shtml.

Page 5 VIII. STAFF REVIEW TEAM: Should you require clarification about specific comments from the staff reviewing team, please contact me, or feel free to contact the reviewer directly. The names and telephone numbers of each reviewer can be found on the enclosed Cycle Issues Report. In conclusion, please note that information forms and bulletins, project submittal requirements, and the Land Development Code may be accessed on line at http://www.sandiego.gov/development-services. Many land use plans for the various communities throughout the City of San Diego are now available on line at http://www.sandiego.gov/planning/community/profiles/index.shtml For modifications to the project scope, submittal requirements or questions regarding any of the above, please contact me prior to resubmittal. I may be reached by telephone at (619)446-5433 or via e-mail at FMendoza@sandiego.gov. Sincerely, Francisco Mendoza Development Project Manager Enclosures: 1. Cycle Issues Report 2. Required Findings 3. Submittal Requirements Report cc: File Matthew Adams, Chair, Navajo Community Planners Inc. Reviewing Staff (Assessment letter only) Michael Prinz, Planner

Page 6 ENCLOSURE 2 - FINDINGS Neighborhood Development Permit - Section 126.0404 A. Neighborhood Development Permit Findings 1. The proposed development will not adversely affect the applicable land use plan; 2. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,and welfare; and 3. The proposed development will comply with the applicable regulations of the Land Development Code, including any allowable deviations pursuant to the Land Development Code. B. Supplemental Findings--Environmentally Sensitive Lands 1. The site is physically suitable for the design and siting of the proposed development and the development will result in minimum disturbance to environmentally sensitive lands; 2. The proposed development will minimize the alteration of natural land forms and will not result in undue risk from geologic and erosional forces, flood hazards, or fire hazards; 3. The proposed development will be sited and designed to prevent adverse impacts on any adjacent environmentally sensitive lands; and 4. The proposed development will be consistent with the City of San Diego s Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan.