BOARD ACTION 9-1. Water Planning and Resources Committee. Board of Directors. February 8, 2000 Board Meeting. Subject. Description.

Similar documents
IRWM PLAN UPDATE. WateReuse Orange County August 17, Marilyn Thoms Manager, Watershed Management Division Orange County Public Works

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

NOTICE TO CONSULTANTS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR GROUNDWATER MODELING AND INJECTION TESTING

Appendix D: Public Meeting Notice

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

2.0 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES TO COMMENTS

Future Supply Actions (FSA) Funding Program 2018 Answers to Questions Received During RFP Webinar and by

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Arizona s Drinking Water Revolving Fund

BOARD MEMBER REQUESTS & INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

STATEMENT OF COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION Regarding S a bill to authorize the Bureau of Reclamation to provide cost sharing

Flip Your Strip Park Strip Lawn Conversion Program MEMBER AGENCY TURN-KEY WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Grant Assistance for Water Efficient Equipment Retrofits Grant Guidelines and Terms

Benita Lynn Horn, MWD

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS. Water Supply Options Review

Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan

COLORADO RIVER AQUEDUCT INSPECTION TRIP FOR EDUCATORS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR. Jed Smith Pipeline Replacement Project

AGENDA MESA WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Monday, September 19, Placentia Avenue, Costa Mesa, CA :30 p.m. Special Board Meeting

Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment

Board Room Rancho California Water District Winchester Road Temecula, California A G E N D A. September 17, :30 a.m.

NAVAJO - GALLUP WATER SUPPLY PROJECT QUARTERLY REPORT: OCTOBER - DECEMBER, 2014 February 11, 2015 Navajo Nation Water Management Branch

Notice and Agenda of a Board Workshop Tuesday, October 30, 2012 at 4:00 p.m.

Santa Fe County, Santa Fe Association of REALTORS January 12, 2017

Smart Landscape Grant Program Evaluation

ATTACHMENT 1 PROJECT APPLICATION FORM. Water Conservation Research Project Title

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR REPLACEMENT OF GENERATOR AT LAKE HILLS 1860 BOOSTER PUMP STATION

Report. Water Resource Management Group. Review of Alliance for Water efficiency Peer Review of Metropolitan's Conservation Program board report

City of Coquitlam. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP No

Public Private Partnerships: An American Priority

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES WESTERN AREA WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY

KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY CROSS VALLEY CANAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE P. O. Box 58, Bakersfield, California

Federally Supported Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment Programs

Operating Criteria of the. Wyoming Water Development Program TABLE OF CONTENTS

Project Guide for Proposition 1 Disadvantaged Community (DAC) Planning Grants

NAVAJO - GALLUP WATER SUPPLY PROJECT QUARTERLY REPORT: APRIL JUNE, 2014

Castaic Lake Water Agency Memorandum

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT KYLE BUTTERWICK, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BRAD FOWLER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

miom ENT CN NEXT 0 PE POSTED MOTION

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Advanced Metering Infrastructure Planning, Specification Writing and Project Management Services

INNOVATIVE WATER CONSERVATION GRANTS

Request for Proposals

Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment

9. Infrastructure Funding Recommendations

CITY OF RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Charter The Charter of the County of Suffolk. Commissioner The Commissioner of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services.

AGENDA 1. DETERMINATION OF A QUORUM. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT Pursuant to Government Code Section

A-3 RECLAMATION NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY

Terms and Conditions Irrigation Efficiency Program

Water Planning Committee January 22, 2015

City of Culver City. Staff Report

MEMORANDUM. Kari Holzgang, Program Analyst State Water Board Division of Financial Assistance

La Plata County Minor Oil and Gas Facility Application

THE COMBAT CENTER. Refining excellence since 1952

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation June 16, 2005 MALIBU ACCESS: DAN BLOCKER BEACH. File No Project Manager: Marc Beyeler

Crystal M. Craig, Local Government Analyst II LAFCO ANNEXATION 21 TO COUNTY SERVICE AREA 134. (SPECIFIC PLAN 327)

Program Management for Full Advanced Treatment Demonstration Project. Pre-Proposal Meeting March 27, 2013

Tish. California Water Environment Association - San Diego Section January President s Report. Dinner Meeting Recap

Part III Guidelines

6 Governance and Stakeholder Involvement

NAVAJO - GALLUP WATER SUPPLY PROJECT QUARTERLY REPORT: JULY -SEPTEMBER, 2014

1 Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District Green Solutions Guidelines

Mission Bay Master Plan File No M September 27, 1990

4.b. 6/22/2017. Local Agency Formation Commission. George J. Spiliotis, Executive Officer

Eastern Municipal Water District Date Adopted: 04/16/97 Date Revised: 07/06

APPROVED August 28, 2017

TRANSMITTAL TO CATE COUNCIL FILE NO Deborah Flint. Executive Director Department of Airports

State Assistance to Disadvantaged Communities During California s Historic Drought

The Community. p a g e 3

IMPLEMENTATION AN OVERVIEW OF THE ARIZONA WATER SETTLEMENTS ACT IN NEW MEXICO OF LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS

ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE FORUM:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES

GOVERNANCE, STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT, COORDINATION

June 8, Honorable Mayor and City Council TO: Planning & Community Development Department

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Synopsis of Revised Changes to DCA s Rules for Developments of Regional Impact

The Land We Need for the Water We Use

Request for Statements Qualifications(RFQ) For

Los Angeles World Airports

Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposals For General and Specialized Consulting Engineering Services for Wastewater Facilities

FY 2016 Clean Water Fund Competitive Grants Policy

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

CAP FARM WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM Terms and Conditions

Procurement Plan. I. General. 1. Project Information Country: Malawi Project Name: Lilongwe Water and Sanitation Project Project ID: P163794

Request for Proposals To Provide Engineering Services for the Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements Project

Submission, Review, and Approval Procedures

San Diego County Water Authority Board Meeting Documents October 26, Committee. Administrative and Finance. Engineering and Operations

S A W P A SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY Sterling Avenue, Riverside, California (951)

Shakoora Azimi-Gaylon Deputy Executive Officer Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy

FY 2018 Watershed-Based Funding Pilot Program Policy

AGENDA SANTA MARGARITA WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS BOARD MEETING JANUARY 20, :30 A.M., BOARD ROOM, DISTRICT OFFICE

West High Service Elevated Storage Tank Project RFP No Pre-Proposal Meeting September 24, 2014

Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Environmental and Permitting Services

Jodie Pavlica, PE Project Manager Wyoming Water Development Office

SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. - AWARD OF CONTRACT CONSULTANT: ENV AMERICA INCORPORATED ASBESTOS AND LEAD MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT

San Diego IRWMP Regional Advisory Committee Meeting #63. Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PERMITS AND SERVICES DIVISION STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAMS DIVISION

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT FROM BRAD FOWLER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING SERVICES

CESAM-RD-M May 2, 2013 PUBLIC NOTICE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS MOBILE DISTRICT

S A W P A SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY Sterling Avenue, Riverside, California (951) AGENDA

Transcription:

MWD METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BOARD ACTION Board of Directors Water Planning and Resources Committee February 8, 2000 Board Meeting Subject Local Resources Program Agreement for the Capistrano Valley Non-Domestic Water System Expansion Project with the Municipal Water District of Orange County and Capistrano Valley Water District Description The project is one of 14 competitively selected projects under Metropolitan's Local Resources Program (LRP) that would collectively produce 51,500 acre-feet per year of new LRP production (Attachment 1). The 14 projects were selected following guidelines adopted by the Board in June 1998. This project is being presented because it has now completed all prerequisites for LRP eligibility and is ready to proceed into construction. Additionally, program guidelines require all LRP agreements to be executed by April 1, 2000. A report summarizing the screening process was presented to the Board in December 1998. The final step in the process is Board authorization of the LRP agreement for the Project with an ultimate yield of 2,895 acre-feet per year. A copy of the negative declaration is available for your review in the office of the executive secretary. Policy Prior Board direction provided by Board Letter 8-9 dated May 26, 1998. Board Options/Fiscal Impacts Option #1 A. Review and consider information provided in the project's negative declaration and adopt the lead agency's findings related to the project; and B. Authorize the General Manager to execute a LRP agreement for this expansion project to provide incentive payments of $150 per acre-foot over 25 years. Fiscal Impact: About $9.6 million for approximately 64,000 acre-feet of water over 25 years. Option #2 Defer entering a LRP agreement. Fiscal Impact: Would avoid future payments totaling about $9.6 million over 25 years. Staff Recommendation Option #1 9-1 Stephen N. Arakawa Acting Manager, Water Resource Management 1/21/2000 Date Attachment 1 General Manager 1/24/2000 Date

February 8, 2000 Board Meeting 9-1 Attachment 1, Page 1 Detailed Report Local Resources Program Background In June 1998, with endorsement of the member agencies, Metropolitan s Board of Directors established the Local Resources Program (LRP). Metropolitan issued a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) for 53,000 acre-feet per year (AFY) of production. Twenty-eight proposals were received and, in the ensuing two-month period, reviewed by a committee made up of Metropolitan staff and water resource consultants using weighting criteria for ranking factors adopted by the Board. In December 1998, staff reported to the Board that the review committee identified 14 projects that best meet the selection criteria. Those 14 projects would collectively yield about 51,500 AFY (see Figure 1). Project implementation would help the region meet the year 2020 goal of 500,000 AFY for recovered groundwater and recycled water production. An estimated 125,000 AFY shortfall in meeting the goal was identified in the RFP. This locally developed water improves regional water supply reliability by displacing requirements for future Metropolitan capital improvements and water importation. Project Features The Capistrano Valley Non-Domestic Water System Expansion Project (Project) is one of the 14 selected projects. The Project involves construction of approximately 18 miles of distribution pipeline, pump stations and ancillary equipment to expand the existing non-domestic water system. This Project will reduce the demand for an equal amount of potable supplies from Metropolitan that Capistrano Valley Water District (Capistrano Valley) would have used to supply current and future customers. Capistrano Valley will construct and operate the Project. Figure 2 provides a description of the Project s features. The Project s capacity is 2,895 AFY. The Project complies with LRP criteria adopted by the Board in June 1998. Subject to the Board s approval, the proposed Project would receive financial assistance of $150 per acre-foot over 25 years as requested in Capistrano Valley s proposal. A corresponding annual contribution from the start of operation (2001-2002) through 2025-2026 will be included in future O&M budgets. Metropolitan will provide up to $434,250 annually for a total contribution of about $9.6 million for approximately 64,000 acre-feet over 25 years. Metropolitan s financial contribution to the Project would be provided to Capistrano Valley through the Municipal Water District of Orange County under a 25-year agreement term. Figure 3 is a schedule of Metropolitan s projected annual contribution to the Project. Environmental Documentation Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Capistrano Valley, acting as the Lead Agency, has prepared and approved a Negative Declaration for the Project. Metropolitan, as a Responsible Agency due to its financial participation in the Project, is required to review and consider the information provided in the Negative Declaration prior to reaching a decision on the Project. Copies of the Lead Agency s Negative Declaration and Notice of Determination are available for your review in the office of the Executive Secretary. No further environmental documentation is necessary for you to act upon in this matter.

February 8, 2000 Board Meeting 9-1 Attachment 1, Page 2 Figure 1 LOCAL RESOURCES PROGRAM 14 Selected Projects Ultimate Financial Total MWD Agreement Total MWD Yield Incentive Contribution Term Yield* Board Executed Selected Projects (AFY) ($/AF) ($) (yrs.) (AF) Approval Agreement Westlake Wells - Tapia WRF Intertie Project 150 130 78,000 4 600 x x Temescal Basin Desalting Facility 10,000 100 25,000,000 25 250,000 x x Dry Weather Runoff Reclamation Facility 280 150 1,050,000 25 7,000 x x Colored Water Treatment Facility 11,300 97-169 37,115,824 25 277,792 x x Alamitos Barrier Reclaimed Water Project 3,024 151-209 13,636,728 25 74,088 x Olivenhain Recycled Project - SE Quadrant 1,788 150 4,076,400 20 27,176 x x Otay Recycled Distribution Expansion 8,515 160-200 21,637,465 24 125,880 x x Santa Margarita Non-Domestic System 2,772 79-214 6,538,416 25 65,951 x Moulton Niguel Phase 4 Expansion 1,276 154 3,821,356 20 24,814 x Harbor Water Recycling Project 5,000 86-139 13,595,000 24 120,000 x Capistrano Valley Non-Domestic System 2,895 150 9,591,300 25 63,942 Juan Well Filter Facility 900 75 472,500 7 6,300 Encina Water Reclamation Phase 2 2,950 100-210 7,975,685 25 62,750 Rincon del Diablo Recycled Water Program 648 15-250 648,785 11 4,633 Total 51,498 145,237,459 1,110,926 * Total Yield is the sum of the project's annual yield over the requested term of financial assistance.

February 8, 2000 Board Meeting 9-1 Attachment 1, Page 3 Capistrano Valley Non-Domestic Water System Expansion Project Project Description Overview: The Capistrano Valley Non-Domestic Water System Expansion Project (Project) will deliver about 2,895 acre-feet per year (AFY) of non-domestic water to existing and future customers for landscape irrigation and municipal purposes. Project Facilities: The Project will involve construction of approximately 18 miles of distribution pipeline, pump stations, a storage reservoir and ancillary equipment to expand Capistrano Valley Water District s (Capistrano Valley) existing non-domestic water system (see Figure 2). Source of Project Water The Project will utilize recycled water from the proposed Southeast Regional Reclamation Authority Reclamation Plant (SRP) - Advanced Wastewater Treatment (AWT) facility and poor quality groundwater produced by Capistrano Valley from existing wells. The SRP-AWT, which would deliver recycled water to the Project via the proposed South Orange County Reclamation Authority (SOCRA) pipeline, is not expected to be operational until the year 2005. In the interim, Capistrano Valley would purchase recycled water from Moulton Nigel Municipal Water District (MNWD) or South Coast County Water District (SCCWD) via a connection to the supply source. Because both MNWD and SCCWD have existing recycled water incentive agreements with Metropolitan, steps will be taken to ensure that no redundant incentive payments are provided to either for Project deliveries by Capistrano Valley. Existing Deliveries Capistrano Valley currently serves about 565 AFY of non-domestic water to its customers. This quantity is ineligible for LRP Contributions under the proposed LRP agreement. The proposed agreement for the Project will require that Capistrano Valley maintain its existing groundwater production for delivery to non-domestic water customers as a prerequisite to receiving LRP Contributions for Project production. Points of Connection Project facilities begin at Capistrano Valley s non-domestic water system connections to Capistrano Valley s existing distribution system, connection to the proposed SOCRA pipeline, and proposed connections to MNWD s or SCCWD recycled water system terminating at the points of connection to Capistrano Valley s non-domestic water customers.

February 8, 2000 Board Meeting 9-1 Attachment 1, Page 4

February 8, 2000 Board Meeting 9-1 Attachment 1, Page 5 Figure 3 Metropolitan s Annual Contribution Fiscal Year Incentive Rate ($/AF) Production (AF) Annual Contribution ($) 2001-2002 150 531 79,650 2002-2003 150 1,062 159,300 2003-2004 150 1,593 238,900 2004-2005 150 1,846 276,900 2005-2006 150 2,099 314,850 2006-2007 150 2,351 352,650 2007-2008 150 2,532 379,800 2008-2009 150 2,713 406,950 2009-2010 150 2,895 434,250 2010-2011 150 2,895 434,250 2011-2012 150 2,895 434,250 2012-2013 150 2,895 434,250 2013-2014 150 2,895 434,250 2014-2015 150 2,895 434,250 2015-2016 150 2,895 434,250 2016-2017 150 2,895 434,250 2017-2018 150 2,895 434,250 2018-2019 150 2,895 434,250 2019-2020 150 2,895 434,250 2020-2021 150 2,895 434,250 2021-2022 150 2,895 434,250 2022-2023 150 2,895 434,250 2023-2024 150 2,895 434,250 2024-2025 150 2,895 434,250 2025-2026 150 2,895 434,250 Total 63,942 9,591,300