SCIENCE SUPPORT FOR THE TO CAMOUFLAGE FOR DEVELOPERS FINAL REPORT. Prepared for

Similar documents
UNITED STATES ARMY HEALTH CARE STUDIES AND CLINICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY. A. David Mangelsdorff, Ph.D., M.P.H. Patricia A. Twist

HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM US ARMY AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE OPERATIONS

DTIC OPERATING AND SUPPORT COST REDUCTION (OSCR) AD-A ,NdLICTE A BASIC GUIDE FOR ARMY MANAGERS. May Warren H. Gille, Jr.

FM (FM 19-1) Headquarters, Department of the Army. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Survivability Committee

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

[mer FREi S EC M. Copy ) DTkt' OCT 1988 TRAC-F-SP m ACN COMBINED ARMS MODEL-ANTIARMOR MUNITIONS N

FM References-1

A udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

TRADOC REGULATION 25-31, ARMYWIDE DOCTRINAL AND TRAINING LITERATURE PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 30 MARCH 1990

DoD CBRN Defense Doctrine, Training, Leadership, and Education (DTL&E) Strategic Plan

Department of Defense MANUAL

FM MILITARY POLICE LEADERS HANDBOOK. (Formerly FM 19-4) HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

I I. I. ill hf I lii 9! ! I I I'!! l' U.S. ARMY WAR COLLEGE, CARUSLE BARRACKS, PA

Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract

150-MC-0006 Validate the Protection Warfighting Function Staff (Battalion through Corps) Status: Approved

Report No. D May 14, Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Subj: MARINE CORPS POLICY ON ORGANIZING, TRAINING, AND EQUIPPING FOR OPERATIONS IN AN IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (IED) ENVIRONMENT

ARMY G-8

Remote Sensor Operations

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333: UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. AGENCY USE ONLY 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE & DATE (leave blank)

Subj: THREAT SUPPORT TO THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

(QJLQHHU 5HFRQQDLVVDQFH FM Headquarters, Department of the Army

Award and Administration of Multiple Award Contracts for Services at U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity Need Improvement

MAGTF Aviation Planning Documents

THE STRYKER BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM INFANTRY BATTALION RECONNAISSANCE PLATOON

Updating ARI Databases for Tracking Army College Fund and Montgomery GI Bill Usage for

,87 DTIC. 0111: EILlEGO. js ELECTE. Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. /I Officer Fitness Report Evaluation Study.

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Night Vision Systems Advanced Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TRAINING TRANSFORMATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Army Participation in the Defense Logistics Agency Weapon System Support Program

Acquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

INSIDER THREATS. DOD Should Strengthen Management and Guidance to Protect Classified Information and Systems

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Maintenance Operations and Procedures

TRADOC Reg DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Fort Monroe, Virginia

DTIC_ AD-A NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS. Monterey, California. j EjLECTE - AN ANALYSIS OF THE ARMY ACQUISITION CORPS

Army Participation in the Defense Logistics Agency Weapon System Support Program

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND 5001 EISENHOWER AVENUE, ALEXANDRIA, VA

Army Regulation Management. RAND Arroyo Center. Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 25 May 2012 UNCLASSIFIED

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Tactical Employment of Mortars

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL QUICK-REACTION REPORT ON THE PROCUREMENT OF THE ARMY UGHT AND SPECIAL DIVISION INTERIM SENSOR. y.vsavavav.v.

ARMY

Supply Inventory Management

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

TANK GUNNERY TRAINING DEVICES AND USAGE STRATEGIES

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #152

TITLE: Comparative Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain and Comorbid Conditions in Veterans

ACQUISITION OF THE ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM. Report No. D February 28, Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE BB / SOF Visual Augmentation, Lasers and Sensor Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

THREAT SUPPORT TO THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

U ~ detri ArerIA1.ab34ma~ ' 040 D TIC 0) ~LPY 0L7T 90U ELECTE TECHNICAL REPORT CPO-90-4

AR Security Assistance Teams. 15 June 1998 (Effective 15 July 1998)

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

DUE PROCESS FOR ADVERSE PERSONNEL SECURITY DETERMINATIONS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

PREPARATION OF A DD FORM 254 FOR SUBCONTRACTING. Cal Stewart ISP

Last Revised February 2018

POSTMISSION ACTIVITIES

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

TACTICAL EMPLOYMENT OF ANTIARMOR PLATOONS AND COMPANIES

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

MAGTF Meteorology and Oceanography (METOC) Support

U. S. Army Aviation Epidemiology Data Register: Trends in the Age Distribution of Army Aviators Stratified by Gender and Component, 1986 to 1992

TECHNICAL REPORT CPO-90-5 D F. 00 COMPARISON FOR RECRUITMENT OF WHITE FEMALES AT THE U.S. ARMY MISSILE COMMAND, FY 85 - FY 89

Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield Cpt.instr. Ovidiu SIMULEAC

Headquarters, Department of the Army Distribution Restriction: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

U A. REPORT NO AD-A / 92054U.S. U.S. NAVY (USN) ALPHA MINE ROAD TEST FINAL REPORT OCTOBER 1991 SEP 2 5 ISZ

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Report No. D September 25, Transition Planning for the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program IV Contract

HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

SPECIAL REPORT Unsurfaced Road Maintenance Management. Robert A. Eaton and Ronald E. Beaucham December 1992

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND 5001 EISENHOWER AVENUE, ALEXANDRIA, VA

REPORT ON COST ESTIMATES FOR SECURITY CLASSIFICATION ACTIVITIES FOR 2005

Security Classification Guidance v3

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

OPERATIONAL TERMS AND GRAPHICS

U.S. ARMY AIR DEFENSE DIGEST

Operations Security UNCLASSIFIED. Army Regulation Operations and Signal Security

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

DTIC ELECTE SEP ) 098. Instructor/Operator Procedures: Videotape. Bradley Unit Conduct of Fire Trainer

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Department of Defense MANUAL

Transcription:

(0 (MANAGEMENT Tom NGUIDE SCIENCE SUPPORT FOR THE TO CAMOUFLAGE FOR DEVELOPERS FINAL REPORT OTIC SEPTEMBER 1989 (ielecte DEC 2 6 1989 Dc Prepared for COUNTERSURVEILLANCE AND DECEPTION DIVISION COMBAT ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE BELVOIR RD&E CENTER FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060 WACKENHUT ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 10530 ROSEHAVEN STREET, SUITE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22030 SDEF TON STATEMEN T A I (703) 359-9000 Approved for public releatei DimbutioD Unlmited. By Authorization for this research was contract number DAAK70-88-D-0015, Task Order 0002 (Task Order to a competitive contract awarded on a technical basis). The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the authors and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision, unless so designated by other documentation. 89 12 26 088

UNCASSIFIED Ia. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION UNCLASSIFIED I A~poved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAC.E I0A NO.- o,070 lb. RESTRICTIvE MARKINGS 2a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY 3. DISTRIBUTION /AVAILABILITY OF REPORT UNLIMITED 2b. DECLASSIFICATION / DOWNGRAC;NG SCHEDULE 4. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) S. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) YAAK70-88-D-015, Task 0002 F PE,,TD24- )GANIZATION 6b. OFFICE SYMBOL 7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION (If awlicable) TFJZHNCIJIES corp. DCASMA Baltimore 6o. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 10530 Rosehaven St., Suite 500 7b. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP C 200 Towsontown Blvd. t Fairfax, Virginia 22030 Towson, MD 21204 U NAME OF FUNDING/SPONSORING J8b. OFFICE SYMBOL 9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ORGANIZATIONj (if applikabe) BELW)IR RD&E CENTER STRBE-HP DAAK70-88-D--0O15, Task 0002 Sc. ADDRESS (Chy, State, and ZIP Code) 10. SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS PROGRAM IPROJECT ITASK IWORK UNIT FORE BELWIR, VA 22060 ELEMENT NO. NO. NO. ACCESSION NO. 11. TITLIE (Indude S curity Oa.ufkation) MANAGEMENt SCIENCE SUPPORT FOR THE GUIDE TO CAMUFLAGE FOR DEVELOPERS 12. PERSONAL AUTHOR(S) JOHNSON, STANLEY R. ET ALL 13a. TYPE OF REPORTIA 3b. TIME COVERED 14. DATE OF REPORT (Year, MkoonDay) is. PAGE COUNT FINAL FROM _10/88 TO 9/89 89/9/89 16. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION 17. COSATI CODES 18. SUBJECT TERMS (Continue on reverse ff necenaty and identify by biock numoer) FIELD GROUP SUB-GROUP CAMU.FLAGE,IECEPTION, DEVELOPERS GUIDE 19. ABSTRACT (Continu on reverie it necesuy and identify by biock number) Development of new materiel for the Army is widely understood to be a oumplex undertaking. Despite the hurdles along the way, the end goal is to produce an array of tools which the field cammnder can use to achieve battlefield success. A key ingredient of the materiel provided to the field must be inherent survivability. The combat developer and the materiel developer must examine many alternatives in the process of enhancing the survivability 6f a systen under development. Camouflage is one of the survivability enhancements that mst be considered- during the development process. (In fact, AMC/TRADOC Pam 70-2 places re-ponsibility for including camouflage of equipment among the tasks to be accoplished by developers' of an item of equipment.) The Guide is provided to assist developers in the execution of their responsibility. It reviews the AMC camouflage program', describes the threat to be countered by the application of camouflage principles and techniques, provides a series of possible camouflage techniiques, and describes camouflage testing and evaluation procedures. (IV-, C 20. DISTRIBUTION IAVAJLABILITY OF ABSTRACT 21. ABSTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION M UNCAASSIFIED/UNLIMTED 3 SAME AS RPT. 0 DTIC USERS UCLASSIFIED 22a. NAME OF RESPQNSiBLE IND4VIOUJ,. 22b. TELEPHONE (ncude Area Code) 22c. OFFICE SYMBOL Brad Spitznogle 1 (703) 664-4458 c STRBE-HP DO Form 1473, JUN 86 Mevoz editowwso-.ete. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE UNCLASSIFIED

STUDY GIST PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Through the application of management science support techniques, the Guide to Camouflage for Developers was updated and presented in a systematic format to assist in the survivability enhancement of Army equipment. By blending the threat to be countered with the application of camouflage principles and alternatives, the "Guide" provides a series of possible camouflage techniques and describes testing and evaluation procedures. MAIN ASSUMPTIONS Since the publication of the original Guide to Camouflage for AMC Equipment Developers in 1978, significant improvements in target detection have been made leading to the need for greater emphasis on survivability and major changes in countermeasures. PRINCIPAL LIMITATIONS The principal limitation in the camouflage program is the lack of a clear statement of requirement placed on materiel and combat developers. SCOPE OF THE EFFORT The Guide reviews the AMC camouflage program, describes the threat to be countered by application of camouflage principles and techniques, provides a series of possible camouflage techniques, and describes camouflage testing and evaluation procedures. OBJECTIVE The objective of this task was to provide management science support for the update of the Guide to Camouflage to insure that all previously published data is current, the deletion of data which is no longer relevant or accurate, and that the latest and most complete information on systems, threats, countermeasure goals, development, and testing and evaluation is included. BASIC APPROACH To assist combat and materiel developers in understanding the Army camouflage technology program and assist them in fulfilling their respective responsibilities during the development process, the Guide presents a progression of steps to be taken to achieve successful camouflage for material in development. Logically, the initial steps involve establishing an adequate description of the developing item/system concept, 1

its intended operational employment, and whether or not it should be camouflaged. A threat assessment then is required to identify and characterize the enemy reconnaissance, surveillance and target acquisition threats that are of greatest concern to survivability. Based on the threat and the item/system description, a military worth analysis of several levels of camouflage is conducted and initial cost options are determined. These lead to the development of camouflage performance goals for inclusion in draft requirements documents. The next phase in the development of an appropriate camouflage suite for the evolving hardware is to review available techniques and means to achieve the level of camouflage performance necessary to achieve those goals. There camouflage actions must then be incorporated in the development process to ingrain camouflage into the hardware development; i.e., part of the system. Finally, camouflage requirements must be part of the test and evaluation process to insure the performance objectives are met. REASON FOR PERFORMING THE STUDY OR ANALYSIS To provide an updated Guide to Camouflage for both materiel and combat developers to assist them in the understanding and execution of their responsibilities in the development process. IMPACT OF THE STUDY The Guide to Camouflage provides a systematic approach for developers to achieve an integrated camouflage program as part of the development process. SPONSOR U.S. Army Belvoir Research, Development and Engineering Center Fort Belvoir, VA 22060 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR... Acce:o', Fwr S.R. Johnson NTIS CRAI Wackenhut Advanced Technologies Corporation DTIC I. ADDRESS WHERE COMMENT$ OR QUESTIONS CAN BE SENT UShin., Commander y... Belvoir RD&E Center -istrib-, io,! ATTN: STRBE-JD Fort Belvoir, VA 22060 Av I,,CY,.;;,eS DTIC/DLSIE ACCESSION NUMBER OF FINAL REPORT Applied for. Dist A / 2 " /A31 d 10Or lveal

FOREWORD This technical report is submitted to the U.S. Army Belvoir Research, Development and Engineering Center by Wackenhut Advanced Technologies Corporation (WATCO), 10530 Rosehaven Street (Suite 500), Fairfax, VA 22030. The report documents the effort performed under contract DAAK70-88-D-0015, Task 0002, to provide management science support for the update of the Guide to Camouflage for Developers which is presented at Appendix A. 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Study Gist...1I Foreword... 3 Introduction... 5 1.1 Background... 5 1.2 Objective... 5 1.3 Program Elements... 5 1.4 Summary of Program Effort... 6 Appendix A - Guide to Camouflage for Developers 4

a INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND The Guide to Camouflage for AMC Equipment Developers is an extremely useful document which focuses attention on the need for camouflage, how to obtain and test camouflage, and the division of responsibilities within the Army for its use. Additionally, the Guide highlights Belvoir's capability to provide consultant service as well as system development and installation. Recent changes in the Army's operational environment resulting from new concepts (e.g., AirLand Battle), the introduction of new forces (e.g., Light Infantry Divisions), and new equipment (e.g., MLRS) have created additional needs for camouflage. The growing understanding of the Soviet capabilities to detect and kill targets has led to the realization that camouflage can increase the survivability of weapons systems. These factors have created an increased appreciation of the Guide throughout the Army. This has resulted in requests for copies and for relevant information. This increased interest in and use of the Guide highlight a need to have it updated. Since the publication of the Guide in April 1978, there have been many additions to the Camouflage Critical (CC) and Camouflage Sensitive (CS) listings, significant improvements in target detection, greater emphasis on survivability, major changes in countermeasures, and the addition of new tests and testing facilities. 1.2 OBJECTIVES The objective of this task was to provide management science support for the update of the Guide to Camouflage to insure that all previously published data is current, the deletion of data which is no longer relevant or accurate, and that the latest and most complete information on systems, threats, countermeasure goals, development, and testing and evaluation is included. 1.3 PROGRAM ELEMENTS The following program tasks were performed to achieve the objectives of this program effort: 1.3.1 Task 1 - Analyze Stated and Implied User Requirements An analysis and data search will be conducted to assist in achieving the following four goals: * Insure that Army established camouflage requirements are documented. * Provide an accurate perception of the threat. * Identify countermeasures; current, near and far term. 5

9 Provide comprehensive lists of tests and test facilities. To insure that Army established camouflage requirements are documented, DA, AMC, and Belvoir regulations, pamphlets, letters and other publications will be reviewed. The provision of an accurate perspective of the threat and the identification of countermeasures will require a review of both scientific and technical intelligence and technical literature. Of particular interest will be studies conducted by the Army and other services. The cataloging of tests and test facilities will require a review of documents ot all services. 1.3.2 Task 2 - Functional Analysis To insure accomplishment of the program goals, functional analyses will be conducted to supplement the requirements analysis. The functional analyses will be performed and the results coordinated with both government and non-government personnel throughout the development community and with user personnel, TRADOC in particular. 1.3.3 Task 3 - CQonduct Evaluations To establish that data is consistent and representative cf actual camouflage systems and concepts. 1.3.4 Task 4 - Provide a Description of Camouflage Techniques To include functional schematics, engineering drawings, specifications, general physical system descriptions, and support requirements. 1.3.5 Task 5 - Proaram Management Documentation Assemble requisite programmatic descriptions of camouflage systems and concepts to describe their schedule and resource requirements necessary to support the RDA process. 1.3.6 Task 6 - Documentation The basic format of the current Guide will be retained. During the update of the guide, a continuous review will be made to insure correct inclusion of material obtained from both the data search and the conduct of interviews. 1.4 SUMMARY OF PROGRAM EFFORT Two separate volumes were prepared; the main volume consisting of six chapters, and a volume containing six separate appendices. 6

The objective of the Camouflage Guide is to aid both the Combat Developer and the Materiel Developer to understand, define and incorporate technical aspects of countersurveillance into the requirement for, and the production of, a battlefield hardware item. The program effort consisted of three phases. In the first phase research was conducted to establish the current state of the art in countersurveillance technology theory and application. In addition the authors developed a thorough understanding of the current Army materiel development process, the currently available applications of countersurveillance, and the inventory of available testing facilities. In the second phase, the authors developed a model for the Guide which incorporated the findings of the research effort together with an Operations Research/Systems Analysis approach. This approach structured an assessment of the threat faced by a candidate system, a determination of which systems needed camouflage, and an assessment of the military worth of camouflage application. In the third phase, the authors drafted and prepared the ready-to-be-published final copies of the two volumes. A ten-step process was developed and defined in the first volume. The process carried the candidate system from assessment of need for camouflage, through an evaluation of threat capability to detect it, to proposals to defeat the threat, on to analyses of the worth of the proposals and selection of the applicable tcchnique, ending with test and evaluation of the performance of the camouflaged system. The second volume contained more explicit and more technical explanations, plus a library of available techniques and test facilities. The final product was assembled with color pictures, charts and diagrams to encourage and retain the interest of the development community in this vital subject. 7

I APPENDIX A A GUIDE TO CAMOUFLAGE FOR DEVELOPERS