Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide. Results of AHA RACTrac Survey, 2 nd Quarter 2011

Similar documents
Recovery Audit Contractors: AHA Perspective. Elizabeth Baskett, Policy, AHA February 23, 2012


Topics. Overview of the Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Understanding Medicaid Integrity Contractor

The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD

2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15

TABLE 3c: Congressional Districts with Number and Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to-Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

TABLE 3b: Congressional Districts Ranked by Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to- Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Current Medicare Advantage Enrollment Penetration: State and County-Level Tabulations

Index of religiosity, by state

Interstate Pay Differential

Voter Registration and Absentee Ballot Deadlines by State 2018 General Election: Tuesday, November 6. Saturday, Oct 27 (postal ballot)

Sentinel Event Data. General Information Copyright, The Joint Commission

Critical Access Hospitals and HCAHPS

Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018

Benefits by Service: Inpatient Hospital Services, other than in an Institution for Mental Diseases (October 2006) Definition/Notes

Sentinel Event Data. General Information Q Copyright, The Joint Commission

5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12

2016 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION

Benefits by Service: Outpatient Hospital Services (October 2006)

MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008

FY 2014 Per Capita Federal Spending on Major Grant Programs Curtis Smith, Nick Jacobs, and Trinity Tomsic

2014 ACEP URGENT CARE POLL RESULTS

Senior American Access to Care Grant

Introduction. Current Law Distribution of Funds. MEMORANDUM May 8, Subject:

HOME HEALTH AIDE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, DECEMBER 2016

PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, ;

Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report

national assembly of state arts agencies

Rutgers Revenue Sources

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. STATE ACTIVITY REPORT Fiscal Year 2016

STATE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS $ - LISTED NEXT PAGE. TOTAL $ 88,000 * for each contribution of $500 for Board Meeting sponsorship

Agenda. Agenda 03/22/ th Annual Spring Payer Panel March 29, Program News and Announcements. Clinical News and Reviews


Statutory change to name availability standard. Jurisdiction. Date: April 8, [Statutory change to name availability standard] [April 8, 2015]

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2016 Q1 Update

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2017

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2017Q2 Update

STATE ARTS AGENCY GRANT MAKING AND FUNDING

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2018Q1 Update

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2017Q4 Update

States Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change October 2017, Seasonally Adjusted

Interstate Turbine Advisory Council (CESA-ITAC)

TENNESSEE TEXAS UTAH VERMONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON WEST VIRGINIA WISCONSIN WYOMING ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2016

OPT OPTIONAL PRACTICAL TRAINING

Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017

Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January Share of Determinations

ACEP EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VIOLENCE POLL RESEARCH RESULTS


Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2014

Is this consistent with other jurisdictions or do you allow some mechanism to reinstate?

FOOD STAMP PROGRAM STATE ACTIVITY REPORT

Weekly Market Demand Index (MDI)

FORTIETH TRIENNIAL ASSEMBLY

National Collegiate Soils Contest Rules

Use of Medicaid to Support Early Intervention Services

Colorado River Basin. Source: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation

Fiscal Year 1999 Comparisons. State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending. Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only

Hospices Under the Microscope: Are You Prepared for ZPICs? Medicare Integrity Programs. Objectives. Fraud or Abuse? 3/3/2014

CHAPTER 13 SECTION 6.5 HOSPITAL REIMBURSEMENT - TRICARE/CHAMPUS INPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH PER DIEM PAYMENT SYSTEM

NAFCC Accreditation Annual Update

Percentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016

International Treaty Law, decrees, & rulings

YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH IS WORSENING AND ACCESS TO CARE IS LIMITED THERE IS A SHORTAGE OF PROVIDERS HEALTHCARE REFORM IS HELPING

NURSING HOME STATISTICAL YEARBOOK, 2015

Percent of Population Under Age 65 Uninsured, 2013, 2014, and 2015

WikiLeaks Document Release

VOCA Assistance for Crime Victims

Utilizing Grants to Achieve Your Farm Objectives

Pipeline Safety Regulations and the Effects on Operator Qualification Programs. March 28, 2017

Help America Vote Act. Help America Vote Act

Weatherization Assistance Program PY 2013 Funding Survey

THE METHODIST CHURCH (U.S.)

CRMRI White Paper #3 August 2017 State Refugee Services Indicators of Integration: How are the states doing?

All Approved Insurance Providers All Risk Management Agency Field Offices All Other Interested Parties

Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments

The Regional Economic Outlook

*ALWAYS KEEP A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE FOR YOUR RECORDS IN CASE OF AUDIT

HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS PARTICIPATION SURVEY

Weights and Measures Training Registration

November 24, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002

Date: 5/25/2012. To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia. From: Christos Siderelis

Table 4.2c: Hours Worked per Week for Primary Clinical Employer by Respondents Who Worked at Least

U.S. Army Civilian Personnel Evaluation Agency

Fiscal Research Center

KEPRO The Beneficiary and Family Centered Care Quality Improvement Organization. Nancy Jobe

Nielsen ICD-9. Healthcare Data


In the District of Columbia we have also adopted the latest Model business Corporation Act.

Transcription:

Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide Results of AHA RACTrac Survey, 2 nd Quarter 2011 August 29, 2011

RAC 101 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) conduct automated reviews of Medicare payments to health care providers using computer software to detect improper payments. RACs also conduct complex reviews of provider payments using human review of medical records and other medical documentation to identify improper payments to providers. Improper payments include: incorrect payment amounts; incorrectly coded services (including Medicare Severity diagnosis-related group (MS-DRG) miscoding; non-covered services (including services that are not reasonable and necessary); and duplicate services. 2

RACTrac Background AHA created RACTrac a free, web-based survey in response to a lack of data provided by CMS on the impact of the RAC program on America's hospitals. Hospitals use AHA s online survey application, RACTrac (accessed at www.aharactrac.com), to submit their data regarding the impact of the RAC program. Survey questions are designed to collect cumulative RAC experience data, from the inception of a hospital s RAC activity through the 2 nd quarter of 2011. Survey registration information and RACTrac support can be accessed at ractracsupport@providercs.com or 1-888-722-8712. The AHA recently enhanced the RACTrac survey to capture more detailed information on medical necessity review denials and the administrative burden due to problems with the RAC process. 3

Executive Summary 2024 hospitals have participated in RACTrac since data collection began in January of 2010. Over two-thirds of medical records reviewed by RACs did not contain an improper payment. $226 million in denied claims have been reported since the first quarter of 2010. 93% of participating hospitals with complex denials cited medically unnecessary as a reason for denial. The majority of medical necessity denials reported were for 1-day stays where the care was found to have been provided in the wrong setting, not because the care was not medically necessary. Two-thirds of participating hospitals with RAC activity reported receiving at least one underpayment determination. Hospitals reported appealing nearly one in four RAC denials, with a 85% success rate in the appeals process. 4

Executive Summary (cont.) 72% of participating hospitals reported that RAC impacted their organization this quarter and 49% reported increased administrative costs. 55% of respondents indicated they have yet to receive any education related to avoiding payment errors from CMS or its contractors. 48% of hospital respondents reported problems with reconciling pending and actual recoupments due to insufficient or confusing information on the remittance advice. Hospitals continue to report that they are receiving demand letters late and that RACs are rescinding medical record requests after the hospital has already submitted the records. The majority of hospital respondents indicated RAC responsiveness and overall communication was fair or good. The average wait time for a RAC response varied significantly, with 17% of hospitals reporting it took 14 days or more to receive a response from their RAC. 5

There are four RAC regions nationwide. Participation in RACTrac is generally consistent with hospital representation in each of the RAC regions. Distribution of Hospitals by RAC Region and Hospitals Participating in RACTrac by RAC Region, through 2 nd Quarter, 2011 Percent of Hospitals Nationwide Percent of Participating Hospitals by Region Region A 15% 15% Region B 19% 25% Region C 40% 35% Region D 26% 25% Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 6

RAC Activity

More than four out of five hospitals participating in RACTrac reported experiencing RAC activity through June of 2011. Percent of Participating Hospitals Experiencing RAC Activity, 2 nd Quarter 2011 No RAC Activity 14% Experiencing RAC Activity 86% 8

The majority of hospitals reporting RAC activity were general medical and surgical hospitals. Number of Hospitals Reporting RAC Activity by Hospital Type, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 1400 1,370 1200 1000 800 Reporting No RAC Activity Reporting RAC Activity 600 400 200 0 95 205 222 14 14 19 11 16 8 13 0 13 24 General Medical & Surgical CAH Long-Term Acute Care Inpatient Rehabilitation Psychiatric Children's Other* *Other includes: Cancer, Chronic Disease, Alcohol and Other Chemical Dep., Heart, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Orthopedic and Surgical hospitals. 9

Different types and sizes of hospitals reported that they were subject to RAC review. Percent Reporting RAC Activity vs. No RAC Activity by Type of Participating Hospital, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 23% 9% 7% 14% 23% 10% 19% Reporting No RAC Activity 77% 91% 93% 86% 77% 90% 81% Reporting RAC Activity Less than 200 beds 200-399 beds 400+ beds Urban Rural Teaching Non Teaching 10

RAC Region C has the highest number of hospitals reporting RAC activity. Number of Participating Hospitals Reporting RAC Activity by Region, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 States By RAC Region 556 576 445 423 373 379 249 228 Region A Region B Region C Region D All activity through Quarter 1, 2011 All activity through Quarter 2, 2011 Region A: Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont Region B: Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin Region C: Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands Region D: Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, Guam, American Samoa, and Northern Marianas 11

RAC Reviews

Participants continue to report significant increases in RAC denials and medical record requests. Reported Automated Denials, Complex Denials and Medical Records Requests by Participating Hospitals, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 Automated Denials 21,406 23,432 27,506 All activity through Quarter 4, 2010 All activity through Quarter 1, 2011 All activity through Quarter 2, 2011 Complex Denials 15,714 29,739 45,533 Medical Record Requests 125,538 173,496 230,311 13

Region B hospitals are experiencing the greatest volume of medical record requests overall, and per hospital. Number of Medical Records Requested from Participating Hospitals With Complex Medical Record RAC Activity, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 Average Number of Medical Record Requests per Reporting Hospital, through Q2, 2011 Region A 332 46,537 62,963 79,632 All activity through Quarter 1, 2011 All activity through Quarter 2, 2011 55,001 49,141 44,309 Region B 357 33,311 32,886 Region C 170 Region D 278 Region A Region B Region C Region D 14

Millions Among participating hospitals, $2.5 billion in Medicare payments were targeted for medical record requests through the 2nd quarter of 2011. Medicare Payments Associated with Medical Records Requested from Participating Hospitals, through 2 nd Quarter 2011, in Millions $1,000 $800 $863 $881 $651 $676 All activity through Quarter 1, 2011 All activity through Quarter 2, 2011 $600 $400 $405 $496 $340 $480 $200 $0 Region A Region B Region C Region D 15

The average value of a medical record requested in a complex review varied slightly across RAC Regions. Average Value of a Medical Record Requested in a Complex Review Among Hospitals Reporting RAC Activity, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $10,754 $11,060 $12,303 $9,767 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 Region A Region B Region C Region D 16

Over two-thirds of medical records reviewed by RACs did not contain an improper payment. Total Number and Percent of Completed Complex Reviews with and without Overpayment or Underpayment Determinations for Participating Hospitals, by Region, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 4% 28% Underpayment Determination 3% 27% 70% 2% 21% 77% 2% 30% 68% 10% 38% 52% 68% Overpayment Determination No Overpayment Determination Region A Region B Region C Region D NATIONWIDE 17

RAC Denials

$226 million in denials have been reported, a significant increase from the $167 million in denials reported last quarter. Millions Dollar Value of Automated and Complex Denials by RAC Region for Participating Hospitals, through 2 nd Quarter 2011, Millions $80 $70 $64.0 $70.6 $60 $50 $40 $30 $22.4 $35.7 $29.9 $42.5 $56.0 $51.7 $50.6 $33.7 All activity through Quarter 4, 2010 All activity through Quarter 1, 2011 All activity through Quarter 2, 2011 $20 $15.0 $10 $7.8 $0 Region A Region B Region C Region D 19

95% of denied dollars were complex denials totaling over $215 million dollars. Percent and Dollar Amounts of Automated Denials Versus Complex Denials for Participating Hospitals, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 Automated Denials, $11,093,911 5% Complex Medical Record Denials, $215,229,657 95% 20

RAC denials are spread among all four RAC regions. Percent of Automated and Complex Denials by RAC Region for Participating Hospitals, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 25% 13% 30% Region A Region B Region C Region D 32% 21

The average dollar value of an automated denial was $405 and the average dollar value of a complex denial was $4,889. Average Dollar Value of Automated and Complex Denials Among Hospitals Reporting RAC Denials, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 Average Dollar Amount of Automated and Complex Denials Among Reporting Hospitals, by Region $4,889 RAC Region Automated Denial Complex Denial Region A $404 $4,309 Region B $349 $4,402 Region C $347 $5,367 Region D $649 $5,299 $405 Automated Denials Complex Denials 22

Outpatient services had the largest financial impact through automated activity while inpatient services had the largest financial impact through complex denials. Percent of Participating Hospitals by Top Service Area for Denials by Dollar Amount for Medical/Surgical Acute Hospitals with RAC Activity, 2 nd Quarter 2011 Survey participants were asked to rank denials by service, according to dollars impacted. Automated Denials Complex Denials 2% 3% 2% 8% Inpatient 21% Outpatient Psych/Rehab/SNF 69% 95% Other (i.e., Physician Services, DME) 23

Automated RAC Denials

Among automated denials, outpatient billing errors had the largest financial impact on reporting hospitals. Percent of Participating Hospitals by Top Reason for Automated Denials by Dollar Amount for Medical/Surgical Acute Hospitals with RAC Activity, 2 nd Quarter 2011 Survey participants were asked to rank denials by reason, according to dollars impacted. 16% Outpatient Billing Error 9% 47% Inpatient Coding Error (MSDRG) Duplicate Payment 13% 8% 7% Outpatient Coding Error Incorrect Discharge Status All Other 25

Region C has experienced 43% of all reported automated denials. Percent and Number of Reported Automated Denials for Participating Hospitals, by Region, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 43% Total Number of Automated Denials by RAC Region 34% Region A 1,369 18% Region B 9,423 Region C 11,787 5% Region D 4,927 Region A Region B Region C Region D 26

Region A: Hospitals more commonly ranked inpatient coding error as the top reason for automated denials than in other regions. Percent of Participating Hospitals by Top Reason for Automated Denials by Dollar Amount for Medical/Surgical Acute Hospitals with RAC Activity, 2 nd Quarter 2011, Region A Survey participants were asked to rank denials by reason, according to dollars impacted. 26% 37% Outpatient Billing Error Inpatient Coding Error (MSDRG) Outpatient Coding Error 6% 5% Incorrect Discharge Status All Other 26% Only 19 survey participants represented in this chart. 27

Region B: Top denial reasons were consistent with national trend. Percent of Participating Hospitals by Top Reason for Automated Denials by Dollar Amount for Medical/Surgical Acute Hospitals with RAC Activity, 2 nd Quarter 2011, Region B Survey participants were asked to rank denials by reason, according to dollars impacted. 3% 8% 13% Outpatient Billing Error Inpatient Coding Error (MSDRG) Duplicate Payment 10% 8% 58% Outpatient Coding Error Incorrect Discharge Status All Other 28

Region C: Top denial reasons were consistent with national trend. Percent of Participating Hospitals by Top Reason for Automated Denials by Dollar Amount for Medical/Surgical Acute Hospitals with RAC Activity, 2 nd Quarter 2011, Region C Survey participants were asked to rank denials by reason, according to dollars impacted. 3% 15% Outpatient Billing Error Inpatient Coding Error (MSDRG) Duplicate Payment 18% 52% Outpatient Coding Error Incorrect Discharge Status 7% 5% All Other 29

Region D: A significant portion of hospitals cited discharge status as the top reason for automated denial only in Region D. Percent of Participating Hospitals by Top Reason for Automated Denials by Dollar Amount for Medical/Surgical Acute Hospitals with RAC Activity, 2 nd Quarter 2011, Region D Survey participants were asked to rank denials by reason, according to dollars impacted. Outpatient Billing Error 20% 23% Inpatient Coding Error (MS- DRG) Duplicate Payment 9% Outpatient Coding Error 30% 9% 9% Incorrect Discharge Status All Other 30

Complex RAC Denials

93% of medical/surgical acute care hospitals with RAC activity reported medically unnecessary as a reason for complex denials. Percent of Participating Medical/Surgical Acute Hospitals with RAC Activity Experiencing Complex Denials by Reason, 1 st and 2 nd Quarter 2011 Survey participants were asked to select all reasons for denial. > 3 days 7% Short Stay 60% (1-2 days) 84% 93% 71% 63% Quarter 1, 2011 Quarter 2, 2011 Other 26% 15% 17% 9% 10% 4% 2% 2% 3% Medically Inpatient Coding Unnecessary Discharge Status No Documentation Outpatient Coding Other 32

Medical necessity denials continue to be the denials with the largest financial impact. Percent of Participating Hospitals by Top Reason for Complex Denials by Dollar Amount for Medical/Surgical Acute Hospitals with RAC Activity, 2 nd Quarter 2011 Survey participants were asked to rank denials by reason, according to dollars impacted. 8% 26% Incorrect MS-DRG or Other Coding Error No or Insufficient Documentation in the Medical Record 3% Medically Unnecessary 63% All Other 33

Millions The majority of medical necessity denials were for 1-day stays and were because the care was provided in the wrong setting, not because the care was not medically necessary. Reason for Medical Necessity Denials by Length of Stay Among Hospitals Reporting Medical Necessity Denials, 2 nd Quarter 2011 $70 $60 Medically necessary care provided in the wrong setting $50 $40 $30 85% $55.8m All other medical necessity denials $20 $10 $0 51%, $6.9m 15%, $9.7m 49%, $6.6m 1 Day Stay > 1 Day Stay 34

All regions are now reporting a significant number of complex denials; Region D hospitals reported the most with 29% of all complex denials. Percent and Number of Reported RAC Complex Denials for Participating Hospitals, by Region, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 Total Number of Claims with Overpayment Determination 27% 26% 29% Region A 8,345 18% Region B 12,360 Region C 11,803 Region D 13,025 Region A Region B Region C Region D 35

Region A: Medically unnecessary was identified by 70% of hospitals as the top reason for complex denials. Percent of Participating Hospitals by Top Reason for Complex Denials by Dollar Amount for Medical/Surgical Acute Hospitals with RAC Activity, 2 nd Quarter 2011, Region A Survey participants were asked to rank denials by reason, according to dollars impacted. 1% 6% 21% 2% Incorrect MS-DRG or Other Coding Error No or Insufficient Documentation in the Medical Record Medically Unnecessary Incorrect Discharge Status 70% All Other 36

Region B: Medically unnecessary has now surpassed incorrect MS-DRG as the top reason for complex denials. Percent of Participating Hospitals by Top Reason for Complex Denials by Dollar Amount for Medical/Surgical Acute Hospitals with RAC Activity, 2 nd Quarter 2011, Region B Survey participants were asked to rank denials by reason, according to dollars impacted. 9% Incorrect MS-DRG or Other Coding Error 40% No or Insufficient Documentation in the Medical Record 47% Medically Unnecessary 4% All Other 37

Region C: Medically unnecessary was identified by 70% of hospitals as the top reason for complex denials. Percent of Participating Hospitals by Top Reason for Complex Denials by Dollar Amount for Medical/Surgical Acute Hospitals with RAC Activity, 2 nd Quarter 2011, Region C Survey participants were asked to rank denials by reason, according to dollars impacted. 9% 20% Incorrect MS-DRG or Other Coding Error 1% No or Insufficient Documentation in the Medical Record Medically Unnecessary All Other 70% 38

Region D: Medically unnecessary was identified by 65% of hospitals as the top reason for complex denials. Percent of Participating Hospitals by Top Reason for Complex Denials by Dollar Amount for Medical/Surgical Acute Hospitals with RAC Activity, 2 nd Quarter 2011, Region D Survey participants were asked to rank denials by reason, according to dollars impacted. 1% 10% 19% 4% 1% Incorrect MS-DRG or Other Coding Error Incorrect APC or Other Outpatient Coding Error No or Insufficient Documentation in the Medical Record Medically Unnecessary Incorrect Discharge Status 65% All Other 39

Syncope & Collapse was a common MS-DRG denied by RACs. Other top denied MS-DRG codes varied significantly among reporting hospitals. Percent of Overpayment Determinations by Top Five MS-DRG for Medically Unnecessary and all other Complex Denials for Medical/Surgical Acute Participating Hospitals, 2 nd Quarter 2011 Survey participants were asked to identify top MS-DRGs, according to dollars impacted. Medical Necessity Denials All Other Complex Denials MS- DRG Description % of Total Denials MS- DRG Description % of Total Denials 312 SYNCOPE & COLLAPSE 17% 189 PULMONARY EDEMA & RESPIRATORY FAILURE 4% 313 CHEST PAIN 8% 69 TRANSIENT ISCHEMIA 6% 249 192 PERC CARDIOVASC PROC W NON-DRUG- ELUTING STENT W/O MCC 5% CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE W/O CC/MCC 4% 682 RENAL FAILURE W MCC 4% 177 RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS & INFLAMMATIONS W MCC 4% 312 SYNCOPE & COLLAPSE 4% 982 EXTENSIVE O.R. PROCEDURE UNRELATED TO PRINCIPAL DIAGNOSIS W CC 4% 40

Underpayments

Two-thirds of participating hospitals nationwide with RAC activity reported receiving at least one underpayment determination. Percent of Hospitals Reporting Underpayment Determinations, By Region, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 72% 65% 57% 65% 63% Region A Region B Region C Region D Nationwide 42

Hospitals reported RAC identified underpayments totaling $26.4 million dollars and nearly $13 million of the underpayments were reported in Region D. Total Dollar Value of Underpayment Determinations for Participating Hospitals, By Region, through 2 nd Quarter 2011, Millions Number of RAC Underpayment Determinations $26.4 NATIONWIDE 6,240 Region A 961 $12.6 Region B 1,213 Region C 806 Region D 3,260 $6.6 $3.6 $3.6 Region A Region B Region C Region D Nationwide 43

60% of hospitals with underpayment determinations cited incorrect MS-DRG as a reason for the underpayment and 33% cited discharge disposition. Percent of Participating Hospitals with RAC Activity Experiencing Underpayments by Reason, 2 nd Quarter 2011 Survey participants were asked to select all reasons for underpayment. 60% 33% 7% 6% 10% Incorrect MS-DRG Inpatient Discharge Disposition Billing Error Outpatient Coding Error Other 44

Appeals

More than one-third of participating hospitals report having a denial reversed during the discussion period. Percent of Participating Hospitals With Denials Reversed During the Discussion Period, National and By Region, 2 nd Quarter 2011 Overturned Denials by RAC Region Yes No Don't Know Don't know 7% Region A 35% 58% 7% Region B 39% 54% 7% Region C 42% 51% 7% No 54% Yes 39% Region D 36% 56% 8% All RACs are required to allow a discussion period in which a hospital may share additional information and discuss the denial with the RAC. During the discussion period a hospital may gain more information from the RAC to better understand the cause for the denial and the RAC may receive additional information from the hospital that could potentially result in the RAC reversing its denial. The discussion period happens before the appeals process and is not a formal part of the Medicare appeals process. 46

Nationwide hospitals reported appealing one-quarter of all denials. The appeal rate was highest in Region A. Total Number and Percent of Automated and Complex Denials Appealed by Hospitals with RAC Activity, by Region, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 Total Number of Denials Available* for Appeal Percent of Denials Appealed Region A Region B 66% 34% 73% 27% NATIONWIDE 73,039 25% Region A 9,714 34% Region C 80% 20% Not Appealed Appealed Region B 21,783 27% Region D 76% 24% Region C 23,590 20% Region D 17,952 24% Nationwide 75% 25% * Available for appeal means that the hospital received a demand letter for this claim, either as a result of automated or complex review. 47

74% of hospitals reported appealing at least one RAC denial. Appealed denials totaled $95.3 million for reporting hospitals. Total Dollar Value, Percent and Average Number of Appealed Claims for Hospitals with Automated or Complex RAC Denials, through 2 nd Quarter 2011, Millions Percent of Hospitals with Any Appealed Denials Average Number of Appealed Denials per Hospital $95.3 NATIONWIDE 74% 26.7 Region A 78% 30.0 Region B 84% 30.3 $17.2 $27.0 $22.1 $28.9 Region C 71% 20.1 Region D 66% 29.9 Region A Region B Region C Region D Nationwide 48

Of the claims that have completed the appeals process, 84% were overturned in favor of the provider. 66% of appealed claims are still in process. Summary of Appeal Rate and Determinations in Favor of the Provider, for Hospitals with RAC Activity, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 Number Percent of of Denials Denials Appealed Appealed Number of Claims Pending Appeals Determination Number of Claims Withdrawn from Appeals Process Number of Denials Overturned in the Appeals Process Percent of Appealed Denials Overturned (as a Percent of Overturned or Withdrawn claims) NATIONWIDE 18,073 25% 11,829 794 4,308 84% Region A 3,298 34% 2,437 146 416 74% Region B 5,783 27% 2,970 217 2,228 91% Region C 4,655 20% 3,230 270 869 76% Region D 4,337 24% 3,192 161 795 83% Due to survey submission marginal error, total appeals may be greater than the sum of pending/withdrawn/overturned appeals. 49

Region B has the highest overturn rate upon appeal at 91%. Percent of Completed Appeals with Denials Overturned for Participating Hospitals, by Region, through 2 nd Quarter 2011 74% 91% 76% 83% 84% Region A Region B Region C Region D NATIONWIDE 50

Millions Hospitals reported a total of $15.9 million in overturned denials, with $7.4 million in Region B alone. Value of Denials Overturned in the Appeals Process, by Region, through 2 nd Quarter 2011, Millions $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 $15.9 $7.4 $3.9 $3.0 $1.5 Region A Region B Region C Region D NATIONWIDE 51

Administrative Burden

72% of participating hospitals reported that RAC impacted their organization this quarter and 49% reported increased administrative costs. Impact of RAC on Participating Hospitals* by Type of Impact, 2 nd Quarter 2011 50% 49% 40% 38% 30% 28% 28% 20% 18% 17% 16% 14% 10% 0% Increased administrative costs Training & Education Tracking Software Additional administrative role of clinical staff Employed additional staff Modified admission criteria Initiated a new internal task force 1% Had to make cutbacks 4% Other No impact * Includes participating hospitals with and without RAC activity 53

The administrative burden of RAC is spread across all types of hospital staff. RAC coordinators spent the most time responding to RAC activity. Average Hours of Staff Time Spent Per Participating Hospital* on RAC by Staff Type, 2 nd Quarter 2011 RAC Coordinator Nurse Medical Records Staff Patient Financial Services Staff Coders/HIM Administrative/Clerical Staff Case Managers Revenue Cycle Management Utilization Management Physician Compliance Officer IT Medical Director/VP Medical Affairs Medical Records Director Vice President (Other than CFO) Patient Financial Services Director CFO/VP Finance Legal Counsel/Lawyer Other 13 12 27 26 26 23 21 18 17 38 37 37 34 32 44 59 63 72 77 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 * Includes participating hospitals with and without RAC activity 54

Many hospitals report spending external resources on outside consultants to deal with the RAC process. Percent of Participating Hospitals* Using External Resources by Type and Average Dollars Spent this quarter, 2 nd Quarter 2011 39% 37% Administrative Burden Average Dollar Amount This Quarter 26% Utilization Management Consultant $34,047 16% Medical Record Copying Service $2,787 6% Other Consultant $7,508 Utilization Management Consultant Medical Record Copying Service Other Consultant External Legal Counsel Other * Includes participating hospitals with and without RAC activity External Legal Counsel $6,147 Other $10,681 Average dollars spent by hospitals that reported utilizing external resources. 55

55% of respondents indicated they have yet to receive any education related to avoiding payment errors from CMS or its contractors. Percent of Participating Hospitals Reporting they Received Education from CMS or its Contractors, National and by Region, 2 nd Quarter 2011 Reported Education by RAC Region Yes No Don't Know Region A 34% 51% 15% Don't know 16% Region B 28% 58% 14% Region C 29% 54% 17% Region D 25% 55% 20% No 55% Yes 29% * Includes participating hospitals with and without RAC activity 56

48% of hospital respondents reported problems with reconciling pending and actual recoupments due to insufficient or confusing information on the remittance advice. Percent of Participating Hospitals Reporting RAC Process Issues, by Issue, 2 nd Quarter 2011 Problems reconciling pending and actual recoupment due to insufficient or confusing information on the remittance advice 48% Long lag (greater than 30 days) between date on review results letter and receipt of demand letter RAC not meeting 60-day deadline to make a determination on a claim 39% 42% Receiving a demand letter announcing a RAC denial and pending recoupment AFTER the denial has been reported on the remittance Not receiving a demand letter informing the hospital of a RAC denial 32% 35% Problems with remittance advice RAC code N432 Demand letters lack a detailed explanation of the RAC's rationale for denying the claim 24% 23% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% * Includes participating hospitals with and without RAC activity 57

Hospitals continue to report that they are receiving demand letters late and that RACs are rescinding medical record requests after the hospital has already submitted the records. Percent of Participating Hospitals Reporting RAC Process Issues, by Issue, 2 nd Quarter 2011 Long lag (greater than 15 days) between date on demand letter and receipt of demand letter 20% RAC is rescinding medical record requests after you have already submitted the records 17% RAC is mailing medical record requests to wrong hospital or wrong contact at your hospital Problems with postage reimbursement 10% 11% RACs auditing claims that are older than the 3 year look-back period 7% RAC is auditing a particular MS-DRG or type of claim that is not approved by CMS RAC is issuing more than one medical record request within a 45- day period 4% 3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% * Includes participating hospitals with and without RAC activity 58

The majority of hospital respondents indicated RAC responsiveness and overall communication was fair or good. Participating Hospitals Rating of RAC Responsiveness and Overall Communication, 2 nd Quarter 2011 No Opinion 16% Poor 14% Excellent 4% Good 35% Fair 31% * Includes participating hospitals with and without RAC activity 59

Participating hospitals rated RAC responsiveness and communication lowest in Region B. Participating Hospital Rating of RAC Responsiveness and Overall Communication, by Region, 2 nd Quarter 2011 Excellent Good Fair Poor No Opinion Region A 9% 51% 16% 6% 18% Region B 1% 25% 39% 21% 14% Region C 3% 35% 31% 17% 14% Region D 8% 34% 31% 7% 20% * Includes participating hospitals with and without RAC activity 60

The average wait time for a RAC response varied significantly, with 17% of hospitals reporting it took 14 days or more to receive a response from their RAC. Average Number of Days it Took RACs to Respond to Hospital Inquiries for Participating Hospitals, 2 nd Quarter 2011 No Response Received 15% 24 hours 15% 14 or more days 17% 7 days 14% 1-3 days 39% * Includes participating hospitals with and without RAC activity 61

RAC response time varied by region. Most significantly, Regions A and D performed better than Regions B and C. Average Number of Days For RACs to Respond to Hospital Inquiries for Participating Hospitals, by Region, 2 nd Quarter 2011 24 hours 1-3 days 7 days 14 or more days No Response Received Region A 24% 43% 7% 8% 18% Region B 4% 37% 21% 20% 18% Region C 14% 41% 12% 20% 13% Region D 21% 37% 16% 13% 13% * Includes participating hospitals with and without RAC activity 62

For more information visit AHA s RACTrac website: http://www.aha.org/aha/issues/rac/ractrac.html