UNCLASSIFIED DMDC/RB-TR-8i/2-VOL-3 MDA93-8i-C-06i7 F/'G 5/9 NL

Similar documents
TO Approved for public release, distribution unlimited

U.S. Army Aviation Epidemiology Data Register: Incidence arid Age-specific Rates of Herniated Nucleus Among U.S. Army Aviators,

OTIG. IIIIIhlhfhIfhI~lUNCLASSIFIED AD-A ARMY APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAM (AAP) PHASE WI - EVALUATION OF AAP OPERATIONS

UNITED STATES ARMY HEALTH CARE STUDIES AND CLINICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY. A. David Mangelsdorff, Ph.D., M.P.H. Patricia A. Twist

Supply Inventory Management

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, October 2014, Support for U.S. Campaign Against ISIS; Doubts About Its Effectiveness, Objectives

Updating ARI Databases for Tracking Army College Fund and Montgomery GI Bill Usage for

Demographic Profile of the Active-Duty Warrant Officer Corps September 2008 Snapshot

Oklahoma Health Care Authority. ECHO Adult Behavioral Health Survey For SoonerCare Choice

Demographic Profile of the Officer, Enlisted, and Warrant Officer Populations of the National Guard September 2008 Snapshot

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2015, A Year Later, U.S. Campaign Against ISIS Garners Support, Raises Concerns

The Prior Service Recruiting Pool for National Guard and Reserve Selected Reserve (SelRes) Enlisted Personnel

uu uu uu SAR REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 2014 QuickCompass oftricare Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid Waivered Services

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS. Report No. D March 26, Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Research Note

NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Patterns of Reserve Officer Attrition Since September 11, 2001

Appendix A Registered Nurse Nonresponse Analyses and Sample Weighting

AUGUST 2005 STATUS OF FORCES SURVEY OF ACTIVE-DUTY MEMBERS: TABULATIONS OF RESPONSES

USAF Hearing Conservation Program, DOEHRS Data Repository Annual Report: CY2012

PROFILE OF THE MILITARY COMMUNITY

YOUTH ATTITUDE TRACKING STUDY 1998: PROPENSITY AND ADVERTISING REPORT

How to Calculate CIHI s Cost of a Standard Hospital Stay Indicator

Comparison of Navy and Private-Sector Construction Costs

SURVIVAL RATES OF PRIOR-SERVICE RECRUITS, Donald J. Cymrot

DOD's Industrial Modernization Incentive Program (IMIP)

mbirnoii m?:r t jpwed im. izsjjis ;rek«2«i i *.rr 5*3 ; fe^-k-' "^ ''"^TJS

2016 Wage Enhancement Funding Application Guidelines Centre-Based Child Care / Licensed Home Visitors

COMMISSION FOR FLORIDA LAW ENFORCEMENT ACCREDITATION, INC.

Changes in the School Based Access Program (SBAP)

Reenlistment Rates Across the Services by Gender and Race/Ethnicity

MIPS Advancing Care Information: Tips, Tools and Support Q&A from Live Webinar March 29, 2017

Call for Posters. Deadline for Submissions: May 15, Washington, DC Gaylord National Harbor Hotel October 18 21, 2015

SoWo$ NPRA SAN: DIEGO, CAIORI 9215 RESEARCH REPORT SRR 68-3 AUGUST 1967

Summary Report for Individual Task 805B-79T-5502 Administer Recruit Sustainment Program Operations at the Company/ Region level Status: Approved

APPENDIX A: SURVEY METHODS

MYOB Australian Small Business Survey. Special Focus Report: Federal Government Budget & Policies, Working Patterns and Internet Use

2013 Workplace and Equal Opportunity Survey of Active Duty Members. Nonresponse Bias Analysis Report

Updating the BRAC Cleanup Plan:

Department of Defense

Medicaid Hospital Incentive Payments Calculations

805C-LF Conduct Custodian of Postal Effects (COPE) Duties Status: Approved

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

ROTC Kicker Reference Packet

Screening for Attrition and Performance

APPENDIX C COMPUTATION OF SERVICE

United States Coast Guard Direct Commission Officer (DCO)

The Engineering Council Graduate Diploma examination

Frequently Asked Questions 2012 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC)

Human Capital. DoD Compliance With the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (D ) March 31, 2003

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

LONG TERM ADOS ANNOUNCEMENT NUMBER 18-07

Army Policy for the Assignment of Female Soldiers

U.S. Army Installation Management Command Centralized Geospatial Data Collection Effort Update

Department of Defense

Report No. D July 25, Guam Medical Plans Do Not Ensure Active Duty Family Members Will Have Adequate Access To Dental Care

CITY OF GRANTS PASS SURVEY

Cal Grant Workshop Beginner Track

Administrative Hospitalwide Policy and Procedure Policy: Charity Care and Financial Assistance Policy Number: Joseph S. Gordy, CEO Flagler Hospital

FORMAT_NAME :DD DISTRIBUTION : DRAFTERS_NAME: MELISSA DEAN, MIL PER MGMT SPEC DRAFTERS_OFFICE: ARMYRETSVCS,DAPE-RSO,

U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom

REPORTING INSTRUCTIONS

Please keep this sheet for your records

The Army Proponent System

American Academy of Emergency Nurse Practitioners 2015 Membership Survey

U. S. Army Aviation Epidemiology Data Register: Trends in the Age Distribution of Army Aviators Stratified by Gender and Component, 1986 to 1992

Chapter XI. Facility Survey of Providers of ESRD Therapy. ESRD Units: Number and Location. ESRD Patients: Treatment Locale and Number.

US ARMY CENTER OF MILITARY HISTORY

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WASHINGTON, DC. 2031O. DASG-HS 26 March Expires 21 March 2003

IIH UIII l I liii II INI! DIRECTIVE AD-A NUMBER Department of Defense. August 16, Prescribes procedures.

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Reporting of Personnel Tempo (PERSTEMPO) Events. References: See Enclosure 1

Get Instant Access to ebook Dd Form 2861 PDF at Our Huge Library DD FORM 2861 PDF. ==> Download: DD FORM 2861 PDF

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

NHS Performance Statistics

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

5. returning the medication container to proper secured storage; and

NHS performance statistics

Army Grade Determination Review Board

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. DIVISION 27 School Construction Matching Program

A udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001

Officer Retention Rates Across the Services by Gender and Race/Ethnicity

The Air Force's Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Competitive Procurement

Comparison of. Permanent Change of Station Costs for Women and Men Transferred Prematurely From Ships. I 111 il i lllltll 1M Itll lli ll!

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY HEADQUARTERS CAMERON STATION ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT APPLICATION PACKET FY 2018 OCTOBER 1, SEPTEMBER 30, 2018

GENERAL EXCHANGE TARIFF BASIC LOCAL EXCHANGE SERVICE CONTENTS

Nursing Students Information Literacy Skills Prior to and After Information Literacy Instruction

University of Michigan Health System Analysis of Wait Times Through the Patient Preoperative Process. Final Report

A. Special Reduced Residential Service Rate (20% Utility Discount Program)

2018 BPS SEED GRANT APPLICATION FOR PGY-2 RESEARCH PROJECTS

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

CalNOC Data Definitions and Calculations: Prevalence Studies Reports

H ipl»r>rt lor potxue WIWM r Q&ftultod

This template is provided by PSNC and NHS Employers, who have developed it to assist PCTs and pharmacy contractors.

If.,, GATEWAY TO CARE MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS SERIES S73 DATABASE PROJECT AD-A (TCSDP) 9 CR MAY 1994

Transcription:

RD-R149 361 RCRS (RESERVE COMPONENT ATTTUDE STUDY) (WAVE V)) 1981 11 CALL RECORD ANALY..(U) ASSOCATES FOR RESEARCH N BEHAVOR NC PHLADELPHA PA JAN 83 UNCLASSFED DMDC/RB-TR-8i/2-VOL-3 MDA93-8i-C-06i7 F/'G 5/9 NL

L Mg518 *,2,5 213 l22 11111L2 1..4 111111.6 MCROCOPY RESOLUTON TEST CHART NATONAL BUREAU Of STANDARDS 1963 A

PHOTOGRAPH THS SHEET W LEVEL NVENTORY < B DOCUMENT DENTFCATON RMTRBUTl STA1ZMMT A Amppodo tt pubc re..ea l, t:) uuim., Unlimited ACCESSON FOR NTS GRA& utc DSTRBUTON STATEMENT DTC UNANNOUNCED El ET C JUST1FCATON E E T *BYD DSTRBUTON / AVALABLTY CODES DST AVAL AND/OR SPECAL DATE ACCESSONED DSTRBUTON STAMP DATE RETURNED 85 01 07 016 DATE RECEVED N DTC REGSTERED OR CERTFED NO. PHOTOGRAPH THS SHEET AND RETURN TO DTC-DDAC DTC FORM 70A DOCUMENT PROCESSNG SHEET PREVOUS EDTON MAY BE USED UNTL DEC STOCK S EXHAUSTED.

i- itlurlry LLASSFCAON OF rhs PAGE la. REPORT SECURTY CLASSFCATON REPORT DOCUMENTATON PAGE lb. RESTRCTVE MARKNGS Unclassified 2a. SECURTY CLASSFCATON AUTHORTY 3 DSTRBUTON /AVALABLTY OF REPORT 2b. OECLASSFCATON /DOWNGRADNG Approved for public release; distribution SCHEDULE is unlimited. 4. PERFORMNG ORGANZATON REPORT NUMBER(S) S. MONTORNG ORGANZATON REPORT NUMBER(S) DMDC/MRB/TR-81/2 - VOL 3 6a. NAME OF PERFORMNG ORGANZATON 16b. OFFCE SYMBOL 7a. NAME OF MONTORNG ORGANZATON Associates for Research in (appiab) Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) Rphauin" Tnl 6c. ADDRESS (City State, and ZP Code) 7b. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZP Code) The Science Center 34th & Market Sts. 1600 Wilson Blvd., Suite 400 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 Arlington, Virginia 22209 Sa. NAME OF FUNDNG SPONSORNG Bb. OFFCE SYMBOL 9. PROCUREMENT NSTRUMENT DENTFCATON NUMBER ORGANZATON Office of (if applicebl.) r.orratary nf F)pfpn OSDML/MPFM/A MDA 903-81-C-r17 8C. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZP Code) 10. SOURCE OF FUNDNG NUMBERS Pentagon, 2B269 PROGRAM PROJECT TASK WORK UNT Washington, D.C. 20301 ELEMENT NO. NO. NO. ACCESSON NO. 11. TTLE (nclude Security Classification) Reserve Component Attitude Study 1981 12. PERSONAL AUTHOR(S) 13a. TYPE OF REPORT 13b. TME COVERED *Tprhniral Rppnrt FROM TO 14. DATE OF REPORT (Year, Month, Day) January 1983 S. PAGE COUNT 16. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATON 17 COSAT CODES 18. SUBJECT TERMS (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number) FELD GROUP SUB-GROUP Military/Manpower/Reserve Force/Recruiting Market/ 05 09 Research/Non-prior service/prior Service/Male/Female 19 ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number) The Reserve Component Attitude Study (RCAS) is an annual series from 1978 to 1982 survey ing the propensity of men and women to enlist in the Selected Reserve Forces (Guard/Reserve) The study is conducted through a random digit dialing telephone survey of the NPS respondents. The veterans sample was selected from listings provided by the Department of Defense n 1983 RCAS underwent a reconfiguration and was renamed Veterans Attitude Tracking Studyn (VATS). The purpose of RCAS is to discover issues relevant to enhancing the number and quality of those enlisting in National Guard and Reserve Forces. Data was collected to determine individuals' reasons for wanting to enlist in the Guard/Reserve from samples of Prior service (PS) men and women and Non-prior (NPS) service men and women. ndividuals sampled were divided into categories of those with a negative propensity to enlist and those with a positive propensity to enlist. 20.9STR3UTON /AVALABLTY OF ABSTRACT ' 1 ABL i T QC ASFC TO 0UNCLASSFED/UNLMTED 0 SAME AS RPT. 0 OTC USERS 22t NAMlqu RSSpMSLE NDVDUAL, Area Coe) 2c OFffieYMBOL DD FORM 1473. 84 MAR 83 APR edition may be used until exhausted. SECURTY CLASSFCATON OF THS PAGE All other editions are obsolete. Unclassified o... -

Unclassified SECURTY CLASSFCATON OF THS PACE RCAS 1981 data were collected in the Fall of 1981 from a nationally represented sample of 1,181 NPS males and 1,096 NPS females (ages 17 to 26) and from 1,812 PS males and 572 PS females recently separated from the Active Forces. Unclassified SECURTY CLASSVCATow OF THS PAGE

;. REPRODUCED AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE " '- RCAS (VAVE V) CALL RECORD ANALYSS ASSOCATES FOR RESEARCH N BEHAVOR, NC. * 1PHLADELPHA. PENNSYLVANA..

S- RCAS (NAVE V) CALL RECORD AMALYSS This is a report of the analysis performed on telephone calls made to collect data for Wave V of the Reserve Components Attitude Study. Sampling For this analysis ARBOR sampled one-half of all non-prior service (NPS) sample packets and one-third of all prior service (PS) sample packets. The analysis includes the final call result of every phone number in each of the packets sampled -- and 4,039 PS final calls. 16,636 NPS * Response Rate The response rate provides an indication of the probability ' of successful completion of the interview, once a potentially eligible respondent has been contacted. This year the response.. rates for both the NPS and PS samples were over 80 percent. The response rate is calculated using the formula employed by the Survey Research Center of the University of Michigan, a major academic-related institution that conducts national survey work. -.- L o

-.... -..------.,.--.-. -... -2- This is the same formula used to analyze the 1980 call record data. The formula is: Response Rate " Number of Completed nterviews Number of eligible or potentially eligible individuals screened This can be operationalized as: U RR = U + V where, U number of completed interviews V = number of incompleted interviews and refusals by potentially qualifled respondents -AL The denominator includes the number of potentially qualified... individuals who refused to participate in the study. These individuals had entered the screening process. Although these individuals terminated the interview before it was determined whether they were fully qualified to participate in the study, they have been included as eligible respondents. Their inclusion in the denominator produces a conservative estimate of the actual response rate. * Response Rates for the 1981 Data: Non-prior service samples -.84 Prior service samples Z.81..... *,* :.

-3- o Data Used to Determine Response Rates As discussed above, 50 percent of all NPS sample packets and 33 percent of all PS sample packets were analyzed. Table 1 shows.*.. - the distribution of final call results. UPS Results: Of the 16,636 NPS final call results, 22 percent were unusable numbers and 8 percent were refusals. Fourteen percent (14%) were either no answer, busy or not at home. Respondents who were not eligible because of current or past military participation, or because they were awaiting basic training, were found in less than 0.5 percent of the sample. Households which did not contain any eligible participant were found in 48 percent of the calls. Once the interview began, terminations occurred in less than 0.5 percent of the sample. Completed interviews were obtained in 7 percent of the 16,636 calls sampled. The percentage of unusable numbers decreased substantially in 1981, compared to 1980. This decrease resulted from a better sampling pool of randomly generated numbers. A majority of the exchages designated for business telephone numbers had been removed from the sampling pool prior to data collection. PS Results. Of the 4,039 PS final call results analyzed, 5 percent were unusable numbers, and 11 percent were refusals. Forty percent (40%) of the results were either no answer, busy or not at home. the sample. neligible respondents were found in 8 percent of Once interviewing began with an eligible participant, terminations occurred in 1 percent of the sample. Completed interviews were obtained in 34 percent of the 4,039 calls sampled....... * - *...-*... **.****.* % *. **,*.* --,*,-*...,.o.

-4- TABLE 1. RESULTS OF ATTEMPTED CALLS -- FOR NON PROR SERVCE AND PROR SERVCE SAMPLESa) FNAL RESULTS OF ATTEMPTED CALLS NON-PROR SERVCE PROR SERVCE BASE: TELEPHONE NUMBERS SAMPLED_.L 16,636 4,039 Unusable numbers 22% 5% Non-working number 7 3 Disconnected number 10 2 Business number 5 * Refusals 8 11 Refusal by potential respondent 1 6 Refusal by someone else 1 3 nitial hang-up 5 2 0 No answer, busy, not at home 14 40 No answer 11 13 Busy 1 1 Fast busy * * Not at home * 1 Respondent moved NA 12 Respondent not at number given NA 12 Other 1 2 Respondent not eligible 8 Current or past military participation * NA Currently awaiting basic training * NA Never in military NA 2 Curerntly in military NA 2 Currently in paid drill status NA 2 n Coast Guard NA * 5 Length of time NA 3 Household not eligible 48 NA ncompleted interview * 1 Completed interview 7 34 TOT TO = Less than 0.5 percent. NA = Not applicable. a) Categorical percentages may not sum to 100 and subcategorlcal percentages may not sum to the categorical percentage, because of rounding. b) As indicated in the text, the analyses are based on samples of call records. Approximately 50 percent of the NPS records and 33 percent of the PS records were sampled. p o S:i:.

- 1 This year the percentage of those contacted found to be neligible decreased substantially, particularly for those ineligible because of the length of time since separation. Moreover, the percentage of potential respondents who could not be contacted because they had moved decreased. These results can be - e attributed to a better, more current sampling pool provided by DDC. S -.S...*..

.- '6 S S S p FLMED 2-85 DTC L...... *.... S -..~.... S..