STATEMENT OF VICE ADMIRAL RICHARD W. MAYO COMMANDER, NAVAL NETWORK WARFARE COMMAND BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

Similar documents
US Military Space Organizations

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support

STATEMENT OF THE HONORABLE PETER B. TEETS, UNDERSECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, SPACE

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Navy s Central Operational Authority Network and Information Operations & FORCEnet

Navy Information Warfare Pavilion 19 February RADM Matthew Kohler, Naval Information Forces

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

CHIEF OF AIR FORCE COMMANDER S INTENT. Our Air Force Potent, Competent, Effective and Essential

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 19 Dec Subj: NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY POLICY, RELATIONSHIPS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM

STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD P. FORMICA, USA

DOD DIRECTIVE DOD SPACE ENTERPRISE GOVERNANCE AND PRINCIPAL DOD SPACE ADVISOR (PDSA)

U.S. Air Force Electronic Systems Center

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

F oreword. Working together, we will attain the greatest degree of spectrum access possible for the current and future Navy/Marine Corps team.

Space as a War-fighting Domain

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

IV. Organizations that Affect National Security Space

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

navy strategy For AChIevIng InFormAtIon dominance navy strategy For AChIevIng InFormAtIon dominance Foreword

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Reconsidering the Relevancy of Air Power German Air Force Development

AUSA Background Brief

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE J / Joint Integrated Air & Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

Global Vigilance, Global Reach, Global Power for America

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNCLASSIFIED. Unclassified

OPNAVINST DNS-3 17 Sep Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

The Cruise Missile Threat: Prospects for Homeland Defense

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Christine Anderson, SES Program Director MILSATCOM Joint Program Office

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF VICE ADMIRAL JOHN J. DONNELLY COMMANDER NAVAL SUBMARINE FORCES

ISR Full Crew Mission Simulator. Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Capabilities for Airborne and Maritime Live Mission Training

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162

Executing our Maritime Strategy

Capability Integration

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate

Cybersecurity United States National Security Strategy President Barack Obama

F-16 Fighting Falcon The Most Technologically Advanced 4th Generation Fighter in the World

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Go Tactical to Succeed By Capt. Ryan Stephenson

Headquarters U. S. Air Force

C4I System Solutions.

Air-Sea Battle & Technology Development

Obtaining Funding From the UNO SPAWAR Contract Scott L. Whittenburg Vice Chancellor for Research

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Welcome to GSAW2005. Collaboration and Common Solutions. Challenges and Opportunities in Transforming National Security Ground Systems

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

INTRODUCTION. Chapter One

UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.

WikiLeaks Document Release

... from the air, land, and sea and in every clime and place!

DATE: FY 2016 President's Budget February 2015 PRIOR YR FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 TO COMP TOTAL PROG QUANTITY

Transforming Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

GAO FORCE STRUCTURE. Improved Strategic Planning Can Enhance DOD's Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Efforts

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Evolving Surveillance and Response Group s role in supporting Navy in the extended battlespace

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

The best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen,

Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Budget Estimates

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

AIR COMMAND AND STAFF COLLEGE AIR UNIVERSITY DISTINCTIVE FUNCTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE IN THE CYBERSPACE DOMAIN

DoD DRAFT DIRECTIVE ON SPACE EXECUTIVE AGENT

TRADOC Pamphlet The United States Army s Concept Capability Plan (CCP) SPACE OPERATIONS Version 1.0

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

STATEMENT OF REAR ADMIRAL TERRY J. MOULTON, MSC, USN DEPUTY SURGEON GENERAL OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON MILITARY PERSONNEL OF THE

Trends in Security Competition

The Fifth Element and the Operating Forces are vitally linked providing the foundation that supports the MAGTF, from training through Operational

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

COTS Impact to RM&S from an ISEA Perspective

Appendix A. Annex N Space

We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan

STATEMENT OF RADM ANTHONY L. WINNS DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE AND BGEN MARTIN POST ASSISTANT DEPUTY COMMANDANT

Army Space An Operational Perspective

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

STATEMENT OF GENERAL BRYAN D. BROWN, U.S. ARMY COMMANDER UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

MEDIA CONTACTS. Mailing Address: Phone:

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 R E P O R T COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.R. 5136

Transcription:

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STRATEGIC SUBCOMMITTEE STATEMENT OF VICE ADMIRAL RICHARD W. MAYO COMMANDER, NAVAL NETWORK WARFARE COMMAND BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STRATEGIC FORCES SUBCOMMITTEE UNITED STATES SENATE ON MARCH 12, 2003 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STRATEGIC SUBCOMMITTEE

Mr. Chairman and members of the committee: Good morning, I am VADM Dick Mayo, the Commander of Naval Network Warfare Command located in Norfolk, Virginia. NETWARCOM is the newest Navy type commander working for Admiral Bob Natter, Commander, Fleet Forces Command, responsible for organizing, training and equipping forces that operate the Navy network. Additionally, I am the Navy functional component commander to the Commander, US Strategic Command for space, information operations and network operations. The Navy supports the changes that were recommended and have been implemented by the Rumsfeld Commission report. Based on the Rumsfeld report, Navy has conducted our own internal review that was led by ADM(ret) Smith. Space-based sensors and platforms have never been more important to the success of Naval operations and our future success is dependent upon them. I will comment on the importance of space to Naval operations, what we are doing to implement the changes that were addressed in the Rumsfeld and Smith reports and the importance that space will play in achieving the U.S. Navy s Sea Power 21 vision. Navy Role in Space Space can no longer be viewed as a separate entity, or even a separate medium. It must be a fully integrated part of our 2

warfighting capability. Space is the backbone of Naval network centric warfare, providing communications, precise timing, positioning, and battlefield characterization. Space also provides critical real time intelligence, and surveillance information for Naval combat operations. The stand up of NETWARCOM has combined space operations with networks and information operations, and resulted in a coherent end-to-end architecture that allows us to fully optimize the use of spacebased capabilities today and in the future. Navy is fully in step with the joint community here. NETWARCOM also serves as the Navy functional component to USSTRATCOM for information operations and network operations. Navy s priorities and direction in space are quite clear. Our job is to integrate the essential enabling capabilities provided by space systems across and throughout our Naval forces, at every appropriate level. Because space is truly joint, we intend to lead where appropriate, fully participate in, and influence the outcome of, joint deliberations on space capabilities to solve our toughest problems, enable Naval transformation, and better serve the combatant commanders. Space Cadre Key to Navy s continued engagement with the newly aligned DoD space organization, and to ensure that Navy space equities 3

continue to be represented, we are developing a core of space experts, the Space Cadre. This is a group of innovative military (both active and reserve) and civilians that have expertise in space system requirements, acquisition, science & technology (S&T), and operations. As the Air Force executes its Executive Agent responsibilities for space, the Navy will stay engaged by ensuring that qualified Navy space experts are in leadership roles, where appropriate, under the guidance of Mr. Teets, the Undersecretary of the Air Force. This cadre of Naval space experts will help shape joint space policies, strategies, requirements, S&T development, acquisitions, and operations. Navy s current involvement includes: our leadership of the joint Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) development and acquisition, which is the new system that will replenish our narrow-band communications satellite system and provide critical communications to mobile forces; our support of the development of future acquisitions, such as the Space-Based Radar for ground moving target indication and leadership at the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) Communications Directorate and the Transformational Communications Office by Rear Admiral Rand Fisher. Additionally, we are committed to aligning our terminal procurement with the development and procurement of DoD Satellite Communications resources. 4

Space Operations The earliest Navy role in space operations was surveillance of potential enemy reconnaissance satellites. Surveillance of and from space over the years has successfully become a Joint and a Strategic capability of which the Navy is a proud participant. We continue for the time being, to operate the Navy Space Surveillance Sensor (the Fence ) and are awaiting the Air Force recommendation on whether it should be continued as a part of the space surveillance network. While over the years Navy s role in space has become predominantly satellite communications, we are continuing to explore new operational applications where Navy combines the capabilities of space with our advantage of at sea mobility. Navy developed WINDSAT (launched on 6 January) that will provide sea surface wind speed and direction directly to ships at sea. We will continue management of vital UHF satellite communications and look forward to flying the Mobile User Objective System in the 2008 timeframe. The real challenge in front of us is how to continue to integrate space capabilities into Naval combat capability to support Fleet and Joint forces. Service Integration In addition, NETWARCOM has taken a leadership role to strengthen the relationship with the Air Force across all 5

information technology, information operations, and space domains, with the goal of sharpening interoperability. The location of NETWARCOM in Norfolk, VA was chosen because of its proximity to the Fleet and the numerous joint commands in the area. In concert with the Air Force Command and Control & Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance Center located at Langley, AFB, we are collaborating on Air Force/Navy ISR architectures; Distributed Common Ground Station interoperability; and supporting each other in establishing the operational requirements for Transformational Communications, Space-based Radar, and Space-based Infrared systems. Additionally, we have met with the Army and Air Force to support Joint Forces Command in establishing and experimenting with Joint Command and Control systems for the evolving Standing Joint Task Force Headquarters concepts. Sea Power 21 and Space Space-based capabilities are vital to the success of the Chief of Naval Operations Sea Power 21 Vision. It calls for a fully netted force, capable of working in a joint and coalition environment, and going it alone when necessary. Sea Power 21 will enable the Navy to become a capabilities based Navy. My part in Sea Power 21, in partnership with Rear Admiral Zelibor, is making FORCEnet a reality. FORCEnet will enable all of 6

Navy s combat capabilities - Sea Strike, Sea Shield and Sea Basing. FORCEnet will link our weapons, platforms, sensors, C2 systems, and our people, into a netted force capable of responding with unprecedented precision, speed and lethality. The products we get from space are absolutely critical to achieving this capability. The capabilities of space are fundamental to FORCEnet and to Sea Power 21. Conclusion My highest priority is to transform Naval organizational processes and culture to fully integrate the warfighting capabilities that space systems present to our warfighters. Space based products must be integrated into the development of new operational concepts, such as the Global Information Grid, network centric warfare, and Sea Power 21. NETWARCOM s ability to operate and develop future space needs, and my execution of FORCEnet must be synchronized with Fleet warfighting requirements and the emerging global needs of combatant commanders. This is my challenge, as the commander of NETWARCOM. I appreciate your continuing support as the Navy presses forward to make Sea Power 21 reality. Once again I thank you for this opportunity, and will be happy to answer any questions. 7