Adopted by the Alliance Membership June 6, 2018

Similar documents
Crosswalk Between the Standards

RRT Manual A Resource for Standard 5 Panel Discussion on RRT Cooperative Agreement Program States

Training Update: Preventive Controls Regulator Training

Authorized Personnel to Review

CMDCAS Handbook Policies and Procedures for Sector Qualification under the Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System (CMDCAS)

THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS. DECREE No. 121 dated May 31 st, 2007

ASSE International Seal Control Board Procedures

Draft Procedure for Community gtld Change Requests January 2018

LaTonya M. Mitchell District Director, Denver District Director Office of Regulatory Affairs Office of Global Regulatory Operations & Policy U.S.

ADVANCED MANUFACTURING FUTURES PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Massachusetts Development Finance Agency.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: AUDIT SERVICES. Issue Date: February 13 th, Due Date: March 22 nd, 2017

MDUFA Performance Goals and Procedures Process Improvements Pre-Submissions Submission Acceptance Criteria Interactive Review

PLAN OF ACTION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF 510(K) AND SCIENCE RECOMMENDATIONS

Prepublication Requirements

EXHIBIT E DRDAP [ ATTACHED ]

Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. Regional Standard Processes Manual (RSPM)

Boy Scouts of America Troop 5 Potawatomi Area Council. By-Laws. Mission Statement

Bureau of Waste Management

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROVISION OF ALLIED HEALTH EDUCATION PROGRAMS ACCREDITATION SERVICES ALLIED HEALTH PROGRAM ACCREDITATION WORKING GROUP

MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

Crosswalk - Requirements for Foodborne Illness Training Programs Based on Standard 5

CAMPBELL UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. For: As needed Plan Check and Building Inspection Services

SPECIFICATION 13.BRAND TLD PROVISIONS

Standard Operating Procedures for Processing Municipal and Residual Waste General Permit Applications. Bureau of Waste Management

When MIOSHA Enforcement Visits

Guidelines for the Myron Zucker Student-Faculty Grant Program

AFDO DELIVERABLES FDA COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT

Research Biosafety Committee Terms of Reference

City of Fernley GRANTS MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR CALIBRATION LABORATORY ACCREDITATION

ARCHITECTURAL HELP GUIDE

OPERATING PERMITS FAQs

Data Acceptance Panel Discussion

Request for Proposal Tree Trimming Services June 4, 2018 Procurement Contact Linda Lapeyrouse

Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. Regional Standards Process Manual (RSPM)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Topic: CAP s Legislative Proposal for Laboratory-Developed Tests (LDT) Date: September 14, 2015

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)

Delegation Agreement Between and. Minnesota Department of Health

City of Imperial On-Call Plan Check and Inspection Services. Released: September 13, Important Dates

ZAMBIA MEDICINES REGULATORY AUTHORITY EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT FOR THE MADERA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Invitation To Negotiate For Welding Training Provider ISSUED September 24, 2014 ITN No

Quality Management Plan

OUTAGAMIE COUNTY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CISCO SMARTNET SERVICE AGREEMENTS FOR MIS DEPARTMENT

COUNTY OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS (TYPICAL)

Re: Docket No. FDA 2013-N-0500 Proposed Rule: Supplemental Applications Proposing Labeling Changes for Approved Drugs and Biological Products

Draft 11/3/2017. Crosswalk - Requirements for Foodborne Illness Training Programs Based on Standard 5

Public Health Accreditation Board Guide to National Public Health Department Reaccreditation: Process and Requirements

ACCF Diabetes Collaborative Registry Program Requirements v1.2 Posted on 9/14/2015

TOWN OF STOUGHTON COMMUNITY CHOICE POWER SUPPLY PROGRAM AGGREGATION PLAN COLONIAL POWER GROUP, INC.

AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE AWARDS

THE CITY OF SEATTLE CITY LIGHT DEPARTMENT 2012 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Long-Term Renewable Resources And/or Renewable Energy Certificates

Periodic Review. Quick and easy guidance on the when and how to update your comprehensive plan

CAP Most Frequent Deficiencies and How to Avoid Them. March 11, 2015

Privacy Board Standard Operating Procedures

TOBACCO LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS DOJ-PROP

Prepublication Requirements

Administrative Safety

Request for Proposal. Mobile Application for Customer Interface. October 6 th, 2017 Procurement Contact Holly Hussey

Request for Proposal

Guidance for Industry ANDA Submissions Prior Approval Supplements Under GDUFA

The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 Section-by-Section Summary

Guidance for Industry

EHR/Meaningful Use

PROCEDURE FOR THE PREPARATION AND FOLLOW-UP OF AN AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND DISEASE REGISTRY (ATSDR) PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT

Health and Safety Policy

CHPS Verified Program User Guide. Version 2.0. Effective December 12, 2013

UNIFORMED AND OVERSEAS CITIZENS ABSENTEE VOTING ACT (UOCAVA) (As modified by the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2010)

Preventive Controls Alliance Training Grant Program. CALENDAR YEARS

Life Sciences Tax Incentive Program

Environmental Management Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER DIVISION - WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 1

Laboratory System Improvement Program (L SIP)

Request For Proposal: Local Heating of Piping

FDA SEATTLE DISTRICT REGULATORY UPDATE

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR TESTING LABORATORY ACCREDITATION

Procedures for Local Public Agency Project Administration (Revised 5/2014)

Economic Development Competitive Grant Program for Underserved and Limited Resource Communities

Life Sciences Tax Incentive Program

CITY OF PITTSFIELD COMMUNITY CHOICE POWER SUPPLY PROGRAM DRAFT AGGREGATION PLAN COLONIAL POWER GROUP, INC.

OUTAGAMIE COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR MULTI POSITION CUPPING SNOW PLOW. DUE BY: March 16, 2015

Faster, More Efficient Innovation through Better Evidence on Real-World Safety and Effectiveness

We Energies Renewable Energy Workforce and Economic Development Grant Program

EXHIBIT A SPECIAL PROVISIONS

105 CMR is adopted under the authority of M.G.L. c. 111, 3 and 201, and St c. 324.

CHAPTER 08 - LAND RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION SECTION GENERAL

Request for Proposals (RFP)

Massachusetts Next Generation Initiative (MassNextGen) Solicitation Fiscal Year 2018

S 2734 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Mifflin Juniata Human Services Department Request for Proposal Instructions Human Services Development Fund (HSDF) Fiscal Year

APPLICATION PROCEDURE TO OPERATE A COMMERCIAL CANNABIS BUSINESS IN CULVER CITY

INVITATION FOR BID Notice to Prospective Bidders IFB # Date Stamp Equipment Preventative Maintenance and Repair Services

ACCREDITATION REQUIREMENTS

Guidelines for Submission of Poster Abstracts for the Tenth Annual National Conference on Health Disparities May 3-6, 2017

FDA Office of Partnerships

4:00 p.m. on May 6, 2016

University of Toledo Rocket Fuel Fund (UTRFF)

Transcription:

Adopted by the Alliance Membership June 6, 2018 MANUFACTURED FOOD REGULTORY PROGRAM ALLIANCE PROCESS FOR RECOMMENDING CHANGES TO THE MANUFACTURED FOOD REGULATORY PROGRAM STANDARDS BACKGROUND The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Manufactured Food Regulatory Program Standards (MFRPS) are a set of ten standards that form a framework for state manufactured food safety program operations and procedures and provide a uniform basis for measuring and continuously improving the performance of state manufactured food regulatory programs. The implementation of the standards will assist state programs with prioritizing their surveillance, prevention, intervention, and response activities to ensure the safest possible food supply and ultimately reduce the incidence of food-borne illness. The MFRPS areas of focus include: Standard 1 Regulatory Foundation Standard 2 Training Program Standard 3 Inspection Program Standard 4 Inspection Audit Program Standard 5 Food-related Illness, Outbreaks and Response Standard 6 Compliance and Enforcement Program Standard 7 Industry and Community Relations Standard 8 Program Resources Standard 9 Program Assessment Standard 10 Laboratory Services The Manufactured Food Regulatory Program Alliance (MFRPA) was formed with the intent to provide a forum for state manufactured food regulatory agencies to interact with each other and FDA, in the development and improvement of their respective state manufactured food safety programs. These activities and the resulting program improvements provide the groundwork for the state agencies to increasingly operate in a nationally integrated food safety system with FDA and each other. The MFRPA serves as the forum to periodically evaluate and make recommendations on MFRPS to FDA. With representation from all of the states enrolled in the standards, the MFRPA can make recommendations for enhancements or modification to the standards, evaluate the language of the standards and corresponding forms or tools used to document conformance with the standards, and provide a mechanism to

receive, evaluate, and ultimately vote on recommended modifications to the standards. Those recommendations will be provided to FDA for consideration in updating the next version of the standards. PROPOSING MODIFICATIONS TO THE STANDARDS State Food Program Managers may submit a proposal to modify or enhance a MFRPS standard to the MFRPA Board for consideration. Each proposal shall be submitted on the form provided by the Board and shall include any additional documentation that is necessary to support the request. Each proposal must be fully completed and clearly identify the standard element to be modified, the proposed language to modify in the standard, and the basis for the modification. The annual deadline for receipt of proposals is October 1 st of each year. Sufficient time must be provided for the workgroups to review the proposal(s) and make recommendations to the Board, so that the proposal(s) can be discussed during the next MFRPA annual meeting. Late proposals received between October 1 st and November 15 th must receive special Board approval to be evaluated and discussed during the next annual meeting. Those proposals not receiving Board approval and those proposals received after November 15 th will be scheduled for consideration during the following year s MFRPA meeting. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL AND ASSIGNMENT TO WORKGROUP Proposals for modification of the standards received by the MFRPA Board will be reviewed for completeness and relevancy to the MFRPS Standards. The Board may delegate this function to an individual or workgroup who reports their activities directly to the Board. Any proposal determined to be incomplete or not relevant to the MFRPS standards will be returned to the submitter with an explanation. The submitter may revise and resubmit the proposal at their discretion. Once the proposal has been accepted, it will be assigned to one of four workgroups for evaluation and consideration. The workgroups are charged with reviewing the content of the proposal, evaluating and/or amending the proposed language to be modified in the standard, and making a recommendation with regard to the proposal. The workgroup recommendation may take the form of: Acceptance of the proposal as submitted, with a recommendation to present to the voting delegates at the MFRPA meeting; Acceptance of the proposal with workgroup amended language to be modified in the standard; and a recommendation to present to the voting delegates at the MFRPA meeting; Rejection of the proposal as submitted, with a recommendation to leave the standard in its present form. 2

Each workgroup shall consist of a Chair, Co-Chair, volunteers from state food safety personnel from MFRPS enrolled states, and FDA. The Chair of the workgroup shall be a State Food Safety Program Manager, State Laboratory Director or equivalent position within a state program. The four workgroups will be assigned proposals for the standards as follows: Workgroup I: Standard 1 Regulatory Foundations; Standard 2 Training; Standard 8 Program Resources; and Standard 9 Program Assessment. Workgroup II: Standard 3 Inspection Program; Standard 4 Auditing Program; and Standard 6 Compliance & Enforcement. Workgroup III: Standard 5 Food Outbreak & Response; and Standard 7 Community Relations. Work Group IV: Standard 10 Laboratory. Workgroup recommendations will be submitted to the Board for concurrence on the workgroup s recommendation. The Board, at their discretion, may add their recommendation to the proposal submitted by the workgroup, but may not modify any of the proposed standards language submitted by the workgroup. If the Board determines that the workgroup did not address the issue raised in the original proposal, or that the proposed standards language or recommendation is not consistent with good food safety or program management practices, they may return the proposal to the workgroup for further evaluation. All workgroup recommendations must be submitted to Board no later than December 31 st of each year, to ensure they can be prepared and disseminated prior to the MFRPA annual meeting. PRESENTATION AT THE MFRPA ANNUAL MEETING All proposals will be presented at on the first day of the MFRPA annual meeting. The workgroup will provide an overview of the proposal, the workgroup s and the Board s recommendation(s), and any proposed modification to standards language. The workgroup will take input from participants during the first day of the meeting, and at the workgroup s discretion, may modify any proposed standards language or their recommendation based on the input received. The workgroup must submit all proposals and recommendations to the Board by the close of business on the first day of the annual meeting. VOTING ON PROPOSALS Prior to the conclusion of the annual meeting, voting delegates from each enrolled state, will be assembled for voting on the proposals. Each delegate will be provided with a copy of each proposal, any proposed standards language revisions, and the recommendations from the workgroup and the Board. Each proposal will be presented 3

by the workgroup, and an opportunity for discussion amongst the voting delegates will be provided prior to voting. Modifications to the recommendations or the proposed standards language revisions will not be allowed at this time. Each proposal as presented by the workgroup shall be voted on by the delegates. Each State Food Program Manager, or their designee shall have one vote to either accept or reject the proposed language as submitted by the workgroup. Those proposals receiving a majority vote in favor of the proposal will be compiled and forwarded to the FDA for consideration, within 60 days of the close of the MFRPA annual meeting. Proposal recommendations submitted to FDA are not automatically accepted for modification of the standards. FDA will evaluate the merits of each proposal and must make changes through their administrative processes, which includes posting any proposed changes in the Federal Register for comments. Because of this lengthy process, formal modifications to the language of the standards will not occur every year, but more likely once every three years. 4

MANUFACTURED FOOD REGULATORY PROGRAM ALLIANCE PROPOSAL TO MODIFY MANUFACTURED FOOD REGULATORY PROGRAM STANDARD SUBMITTER NAME: DATE: AGENCY: EMAIL: PHONE: STANDARD YOUR PROPOSAL SEEKS TO MODIFY: DESCRIBE THE CURRENT STANDARD REQUIREMENT: DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSED CHANGE & PROVIDE YOUR PROPOSED LANGUAGE: WHAT PROBLEM OR DEFFICIENCY DOES YOUR PROPOSAL ADDRESS: FOR BOARD USE ONLY: ACCEPTED REJECTED DATE PROPOSAL RECEIVED: ASSIGNED TO WORKGROUP: Submit your completed form and additional supporting documents via email to pkennelly@afdo.org. Submission deadline is October 1 st of each year. 5