The Rising Tide Measure: Communication With Nurses

Similar documents
snapshot Improving Experience of Care Scores Alone is NOT the Answer: Hospitals Need a Patient-Centric Foundation

CAHPS Focus on Improvement The Changing Landscape of Health Care. Ann H. Corba Patient Experience Advisor Press Ganey Associates

The Link Between Patient Experience and Patient and Family Engagement

IMPROVING HCAHPS, PATIENT MORTALITY AND READMISSION: MAXIMIZING REIMBURSEMENTS IN THE AGE OF HEALTHCARE REFORM

PG snapshot Nursing Special Report. The Role of Workplace Safety and Surveillance Capacity in Driving Nurse and Patient Outcomes

Value-Based Purchasing & Payment Reform How Will It Affect You?

Value Based Purchasing

Environmental Services: Delivering on the Patient-Centered Promise

NURSING SPECIAL REPORT

CONSULTING ASSURANCE TAX. Hospital Revenue At Risk. For Leapfrog Reporting Hospitals Sample Reports

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010

Joint Replacement Outweighs Other Factors in Determining CMS Readmission Penalties

Food for Thought: Maximizing the Positive Impact Food Can Have on a Patient s Stay

Patient Experience Heart & Vascular Institute

Cleveland Clinic Implementing Value-Based Care

The Patient Experience at Florida Hospital Learning Module for Students

HCAHPS: Background and Significance Evidenced Based Recommendations

Optimizing Reimbursement & Quality with Pay for Performance

HEN 2.0 QUALITY IMPROVEMENT (QI) OFFICE HOURS: PATIENT SATISFACTION. August 3, :00 AM 12:00 PM CDT

Improving Patient Satisfaction with Minitab

Value based Purchasing Legislation, Methodology, and Challenges

HCAHPS and Readmissions: Making the Connection Wednesday, September 18, :00 a.m. 10:00 a.m.

Performance Scorecard 2013

Disclosures. The speakers have no relevant financial or nonfinancial relationships to disclose

CMS Quality Program Overview

Managing Healthcare Payment Opportunity Fundamentals CENTER FOR INDUSTRY TRANSFORMATION

Advancing Accountability for Improving HCAHPS at Ingalls

Understanding Patient Choice Insights Patient Choice Insights Network

Facility State National

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated September 2012

How Your Hospital s Total Performance Score (TPS) Will Impact Your Medicare Payments

Educational Innovation Brief: Educating Graduate Nursing Students on Value Based Purchasing

Value-based incentive payment percentage 3

Succeeding in a New Era of Health Care Delivery

CMS in the 21 st Century

The Rising Importance of Patient Satisfaction in a Value-Based Environment

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated May 2011

Quality Improvement in the Advent of Population Health Management WHITE PAPER

3/19/2013. Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary: The New Link Between Acute and Post Acute Providers

The Community Care Navigator Program At Lawrence Memorial Hospital

Performance Scorecard 2009

Is there an impact of Health Information Technology on Delivery and Quality of Patient Care?

Medicare P4P -- Medicare Quality Reporting, Incentive and Penalty Programs

Impact of a Discharge Concierge Medication Delivery Service on Patient Satisfaction Scores

Patient Experience Heart & Vascular Institute

The ins and outs of CDE 10 steps for addressing clinical documentation excellence

Special Open Door Forum Participation Instructions: Dial: Reference Conference ID#:

Can patients reliably identify safe, high quality care?

Collaborative Activation of Resources and Empowerment Services Building Programs to Fit Patients vs. Bending Patients to Fit Programs

A26/B26: Goal Zero: South Carolina s Commitment to Safety

PATIENT SATISFACTION REPORT HCAHPS 1 - Inpatient Adult Units MARCH DATA - Final Report 2

75,000 Approxiamte amount of deaths ,000 Number of patients who contract HAIs each year 1. HAIs: Costing Everyone Too Much

PATIENT SATISFACTION REPORT HCAHPS 1 - Inpatient Adult Units APRIL DATA - Final Report 2

The Nexus of Quality and Finance

Delivery System Reform The ACA and Beyond: Challenges Strategies Successes Failures Future

03/24/2017. Measuring What Matters to Improve the Patient Experience. Building Compassion Into Everyday Practice

The dawn of hospital pay for quality has arrived. Hospitals have been reporting

Drivers of HCAHPS Performance from the Front Lines of Healthcare

Clinical Operations. Kelvin A. Baggett, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A. SVP, Clinical Operations & Chief Medical Officer December 10, 2012

Clinical and Financial Benefits of IT Implementation

Updates from CMS: Value-Based Purchasing, ACOs, and Other Initiatives The Seventh National Pay for Performance Summit March 20, 2012

The 5 W s of the CMS Core Quality Process and Outcome Measures

Introduction to Patient Experience Surveys

Census Based Surveying for Today s Consumer-Driven Industry

Guidance for Developing Payment Models for COMPASS Collaborative Care Management for Depression and Diabetes and/or Cardiovascular Disease

2015 Executive Overview

CME Disclosure. HCAHPS- Hardwiring Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success. Accreditation Statement. Designation of Credit.

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

Executing a Patient Experience Measurement Initiative

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

Clinical Quality Payment Policies Impact to Finance and Operations

Value-Based Purchasing: A Rural Hospital Perspective

Regulatory Advisor Volume Eight

Hospital Compare Quality Measures: 2008 National and Florida Results for Critical Access Hospitals

Visualizing the Patient Experience Using an Agile Framework

Critical Access Hospital Quality

The CAHPS Ambulatory Care Improvement Guide

Quality and Health Care Reform: How Do We Proceed?

Quality: The Race Without a Finish Line

PASSPORT ecare NEXT AND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

The Cleveland Clinic Experience

Banner Health Friday, February 20, 2015

Transitional Care Clinic and post-discharge calls boost patient-centered care effectiveness and cost savings.

Unifying Real-Time Mobile Rounds with Follow Up Care Calls to Improve Patient Experience and Outcomes

Running head: LEADERSHIP ANALYSIS: ROUNDING 1

Clinical Documentation: Beyond The Financials Cheryll A. Rogers, RHIA, CDIP, CCDS, CCS Senior Inpatient Consultant 3M HIS Consulting Services

Deborah Austin, Director, Patient Relations/Accreditation John Muir Health February 19, 2014

Post-Acute Preferred Provider Arrangements Strategies for Partnership Transacting in the Post-Acute Care Space Crash Course November 28, 2017

Incentives and Penalties

Responsiveness of Hospital Staff. Julie Kennedy BSN, RN

Evidence and Positions on Nurse Fatigue and Shift Length. Part 1. The evidence. Journal of Nursing Administration, 40(3),

National Patient Safety Goals & Quality Measures CY 2017

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

Exhibit 1. Medicare Shared Savings Program: Year 1 Performance of Participating Accountable Care Organizations (2013)

Medicare Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System for Acute Care Hospitals Final 2016 Rates & Policies 1

The Determinants of Patient Satisfaction in the United States

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

Patient Experience & Satisfaction

Inpatient to Outpatient Transitions: Admissions, Discharges & Transfers

Saving Lives with Best Practices and Improvements in Sepsis Care

Transcription:

The Rising Tide Measure: Communication With Nurses At no other point in history have patient perceptions of care had such a direct, quantifiable impact on health care organizations financial performance and impact on clinical outcomes. Specifically, 30% of hospitals VBP incentive payments will be determined by how patients evaluate their stay on eight HCAHPS dimensions that make up the Patient Experience of Care domain within the VBP framework. Summary The critical role that nurses play in the health care system has long been understood. A Press Ganey study further demonstrates this importance and the essential role nurses serve in transforming the health care system. Starting October 2012, hospitals Medicare payments began to be partially tied to their scores on the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. A Press Ganey study shows that performance on the Communication with Nurses dimension strongly influences four other Patient Experience of Care dimensions within the value-based purchasing (VBP) framework. Further, there is a growing body of evidence that HCAHPS performance in general and performance on the Communications with Nurses dimension in particular is strongly associated with hospital performance on other Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) payment programs. Thinking of Communication with Nurses as a rising tide measure, and focusing improvement efforts on the factors that drive scores, may be an effective way to maximize VBP incentive payments and improve hospital performance on other pay-for-performance initiatives. Ultimately, these efforts promise to have a substantial impact on delivering true patient-centered care. Overview At no other point in history have patient perceptions of care had such a direct, quantifiable impact on health care organizations financial performance and clinical outcomes. Specifically, 30% of hospitals VBP incentive payments will be determined by how patients evaluate their stay on eight HCAHPS dimensions that make up the Patient Experience of Care domain within the VBP framework: Communication with Doctors Communication with Nurses Responsiveness of Hospital Staff Pain Management Communication about Medication Cleanliness/Quietness of Hospital Environment Discharge Information Overall Rating Hospitals have the opportunity to impact up to half of that 30% by focusing their efforts on one particular metric. A Press Ganey study identified Communication with Nurses as a rising tide measure among the eight HCAHPS dimensions of care. A rising tide measure is one whose change and trajectory in performance is correlated with multiple measures. This effect is important to understand when devising performance improvement strategies because, as the score of a rising tide measure increases, the scores of the associated measures are likely to rise as well.

Considering that most hospitals have a wide range of improvement opportunities and limited resources to expend on them, the findings from the study offer important insights on how hospitals can strategically implement improvement initiatives that may yield rapid and far-reaching positive change. Key Findings Using data from a robust sample of 3,062 United States acute care hospitals, Press Ganey s research team conducted a Hierarchical Variable Clustering Analysis on all eight HCAHPS dimensions. This type of analysis is different from a traditional correlation analysis, which looks at the relationship between two measures only. The variable clustering technique identifies multiple measures that hang together consistently, and the hierarchical analysis identifies which measure (or cluster of measures) leads the others. The objective of the analysis can be likened to a statistician s version of Follow the Leader that answers a step-wise series of research questions: 1. Which HCAHPS dimension is the leader? 2. Which dimensions follow the leader? 3. In what order do the other dimensions follow? 4. How closely do the other dimensions follow? The answers to these questions allow hospitals to strategically focus their performance improvement resources on high-impact issues. Press Ganey s analysis identified five HCAHPS dimensions that consistently cluster together: Communication with Nurses Responsiveness of Hospital Staff Pain Management Communication about Medication Overall Rating As depicted in Figure 1, Communication with Nurses leads the other four measures. This means that when a hospital aims improvement efforts on the Communication with Nurses dimension, it likely will see associated gains in performance in the other four dimensions in the cluster. FIGURE 1. THE RISING TIDE MEASURE: COMMUNICATION WITH NURSES SATISFACTION MEASURES Spearman ρ 2 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 Discharge MD Comm Clean/Quiet Hospital Rate Meds Expl Pain Mgmt Communication with Nurses leads the four other dimensions in this cluster. RN Comm Responsive 2

Just how much associated gain will a hospital see in the other dimensions performance? It depends upon how statistically close a particular measure is to Communication with Nurses. To use the Follow the Leader analogy again, the rate of change and degree of change in performance will likely be greater for Responsiveness of Hospital Staff which follows Communication with Nurses very closely than it would be for the Overall Rating which is farthest behind the leader of the cluster. Figure 1 also depicts how the measures in the cluster are likely to influence each other as illustrated by the brackets. Specifically, Communication with Nurses and Responsiveness of Hospital Staff together have a high likelihood of influencing Pain Management. These three measures then will have a likelihood of influencing Communication about Medication. Finally, it is the full force of the four Communication with Nurses, Responsiveness of Hospital Staff, Pain Management, and Communication about Medication that influence the Overall Rating. As the industry moves towards a continuum of care model, the role of nurses and nurse communication will become even more important. The Benefits of Improving Communication Between Nurses and Patients It should come as no surprise that nurse communication has surfaced as a rising tide measure. The vast majority of the encounters that patients likely take into consideration when evaluating hospital performance on the Responsiveness of Hospital Staff, Pain Management, and Communication about Medication dimensions happen largely within the context of their interactions with nurses. The effects of improving performance on the Communication with Nurses dimension will likely have positive implications that reach beyond the VBP program. Ample academic literature points to strong associations between levels of performance on these dimensions and clinical areas of interest that are evaluated in CMS other payment programs, such as: Improved treatment compliance Reduced 30-day readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia patients Lower inpatient mortality rates among Acute Myocardial Infarction patients Lower rates of certain hospital acquired conditions including patient falls, decubitus ulcers, and hospital-acquired infections Further, Press Ganey research demonstrates an association between hospital performance on HCAHPS in general and in the CMS Readmissions Reduction program, another accountability program under which hospitals have a portion of the base operating diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment at risk (see Figure 2). FIGURE 2. READMISSION PENALTY BY HCAHPS VBP SCORE SLOPE = 0.070267; P = 0.0035.40%.30% READMISSION PENALTY.20%.10%.00% 0-19 20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 HCAHPS VBP SCORE 3

Press Ganey Observations and Recommendations Making investments that improve communications between nurses and patients does more than improve performance on the various accountability and payment programs. It is central to a hospital s ability to provide truly patient-centered care and positions the hospital to successfully meet the goals of CMS Triple Aim and the National Quality Strategy. There are several best practices associated with solid performance on the Communication with Nurses dimension and the dimensions that are strongly associated with it. These include consistent and purposeful hourly rounding, bedside shift reporting, use of scripts, post-discharge phone calls, hiring nursing candidates who exhibit strong interpersonal skills, and providing service skills training with periodic reinforcement. Some of these best practices are common sense in nature, while others represent a fundamentally different approach to patient management than may be practiced at many hospitals. Implementing and sustaining these best practices requires more than training and tools. It requires a culture that promotes individual responsibility and accountability for delivering patient-centered care. It also entails an ongoing commitment by the organization to fully implement the best practice strategies; this means fully engaging stakeholders in the importance and benefits of the practices, as well as monitoring success, addressing shortfalls, and celebrating successes. About the Study The study was completed using data from 3,062 United States acute care hospitals in the CMS Hospital Compare Database. The data were collected between October 1, 2009, and September 30, 2010, and were analyzed by performing a Hierarchical Variable Clustering Analysis on all eight HCAHPS dimensions. Additional Resources Boulding, W., Glickman, S. W., Manary, M. P., Schulman, K. A., & Staelin, R. (2011). Relationship between patient satisfaction with inpatient care and hospital readmission within 30 days. American Journal of Managed Care, 17(1), 41-48. Doyle, C., Lennox, L., & Bell, D. (2013). A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open, 3. Glickman, S. W., Boulding, W., Manary, M., Staelin, R., Roe, M. T., Wolosin, R. J., Ohman, E. M., Peterson E. D., & Schulman K. A. (2010). Patient satisfaction and its relationship with clinical quality and inpatient mortality in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 3(2), 188-195. Institute for Healthcare Improvement (2012). IHI triple aim initiative. Retrieved from: http://www.ihi.org/ offerings/initiatives/tripleaim/pages/default.aspx Isaac, T., Zaslavsky, A. M., Cleary, P. D., & Landon, B. E. (2010, August). The relationship between patients perception of care and measures of hospital quality and safety. Health Services Research, 45(4), 1024-1040. Press Ganey Associates, Inc. (2012). The Relationship Between HCAHPS Performance and Readmission Penalties. [White Paper] Trucano, M., & Kaldenberg, D. O. (2007). The relationship between patient perceptions of hospital practices and facility infection rates: Evidence from Pennsylvania hospitals. Patient Safety & Quality Healthcare. Wolosin, R., Ayala, L., & Fulton, B. R. (2012). Nursing care, inpatient satisfaction, and value-based purchasing. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(6), 321-325. 4

About Press Ganey: Transforming the Patient Experience For nearly 30 years, Press Ganey s mission has been to support health care providers in understanding and improving the entire patient experience. As a strategic business partner to more than 10,000 health care organizations across the country and across the continuum of care, we are the leader in helping create continuous, sustainable improvement. Press Ganey serves clients nationwide with locally based teams of associates to ensure strong client connections and relationships. As a result, Press Ganey is acutely aware of the challenges and opportunities unique to specific providers and their communities. Our associates are professionals, deeply rooted in health care and strongly committed to our clients success. Whether it's in a hospital, medical practice, ambulatory or home care setting, we partner with clients to capture the voice of the patient and apply advanced analytics to identify targeted opportunities to improve the patient experience. Our comprehensive suite of health care solutions helps clients meet their goals of improved quality, better care and lower costs. Press Ganey provides both ongoing advisory services and consulting in all phases of performance improvement. Our patient experience advisors are uniquely trained and skilled to identify areas of opportunity and help clients implement targeted improvement plans. Our consultants, whose health care experience is a true differentiator, work in partnership with organizations to identify and implement best practices across their operations. Simply put, we support the mission of our clients to deliver better care, and are dedicated to helping understand and improve every dimension of the patient experience. To learn more about how Press Ganey can help your organization gain a competitive edge in transforming the patient experience, visit www.pressganey.com. 404 Columbia Place South Bend, IN 46601 800.232.8032 pressganey.com 2013 Press Ganey Associates, Inc.