Improving Developmental & Operational Test Integration via Technology

Similar documents
ATEC Overview and the AEC Logistics Mission

Prepared for Milestone A Decision

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

Testing in a Joint Environment. Janet Garber Director Test and Evaluation Office Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of the Army

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Mission Based T&E Progress

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO

FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL)

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #98

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures

Department of the Army *ATEC Regulation United States Army Test and Evaluation Command 4501 Ford Avenue Alexandria, VA August 2004

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item No. 3 Page 1 of 15

UNMANNED SYSTEMS T&E Challenges & Opportunities. Dr. James Streilein February 2008

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

First Announcement/Call For Papers

ATEC Testing In Support of the War

US Special Operations Command

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Test and Evaluation in Acquisition of Capabilities

SYSTEM DESCRIPTION & CONTRIBUTION TO JOINT VISION

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

JAVELIN ANTITANK MISSILE

ARMY TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEM (ATACMS) BLOCK II

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Biometrics Enabled Intelligence FY 2012 OCO

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

GLOBAL BROADCAST SERVICE (GBS)

SUBJECT: U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) Interim Policy Guidance (IPG) 08-1, Test and Evaluation Document Name Changes

Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY. Modernizing Army Test Range Infrastructure to Support Transformation

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 President's Budget Submission

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Conducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment

Joint Distributed Engineering Plant (JDEP)

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

NDIA Air Targets and UAV Division Symposium. LTC Scott Tufts 4 October 2012

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY MULTIFUNCTIONAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM-LOW VOLUME TERMINAL 2 (MIDS-LVT 2)

I n t r o d u c t i o n

GUARDING THE INTENT OF THE REQUIREMENT. Stephen J Scukanec. Eric N Kaplan

Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

MULTIPLE LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (MLRS) M270A1 LAUNCHER

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45

AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)

Data Collection & Field Exercises: Lessons from History. John McCarthy

DOT&E Initiatives from the Middle

NON-MAJOR SYSTEMS OT&E

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Future Combat Systems

System Test and Evaluation Policy

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Future Combat Systems Industry Day Briefing

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Army Technical Test Instrumentation and Targets. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

T&E in a Time of Risk and Change

C4I System Solutions.

Institutionalizing a Culture of Statistical Thinking in DoD Testing

NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION NET3 CONFERENCE REMARKS BY MG (RET) WILLIE B. NANCE, JR. EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, CYPRESS INTERNATIONAL INC.

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

The Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Future Force Capabilities

Gerry Christeson Test Resource Management Center 20 October 2010

JOINT SURVEILLANCE TARGET ATTACK RADAR SYSTEM (JSTARS) E-8C AND COMMON GROUND STATION (CGS)

Middle Tier Acquisition and Other Rapid Acquisition Pathways

AVW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

CBDP BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

M&S for OT&E - Examples

GOOD MORNING I D LIKE TO UNDERSCORE THREE OF ITS KEY POINTS:

Joint Test & Evaluation Program

FCS Update & Testing. Bud Irish SAIC Vice President FCS Integrated Phases, Simulation & Test Deputy IPT MGR

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

17 th ITEA Engineering Workshop: System-of-Systems in a 3rd Offset Environment: Way Forward

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE J / Joint Integrated Air & Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 13 R-1 Line #68

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2000

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

An Interview With BG(P) Charles A. Cartwright. Meg Williams

Transcription:

Improving Developmental & Operational Test Integration via Technology Brian M. Simmons Director US Army Evaluation Center 15 April 2008

Agenda ATEC Mission OSD & Army Acquisition Initiatives Benefits of DT/OT Integration DT/OT Integration in the Army and Technologies that May Help 2

ATEC Mission Plan, conduct, and report the results of tests, simulations, experiments, and evaluations to Acquisition decision makers in order to ensure our Army s Warfighters have the right capabilities for success across the entire spectrum of operations. Conduct rapid testing in direct support of the GWOT warfighter in order to provide capabilities and limitations of weapon systems issued directly to Soldiers conducting combat operations (Iraq/Afghanistan). 3

OSD T&E Initiatives Focus on measuring improvements to capability and operational support Experiment to learn strengths & weaknesses - impact on capabilities Integrate Developmental Testing & Operational Testing Start early, be operationally realistic, continue throughout the life cycle Evaluate in mission context at time of fielding Compare to current mission capabilities Use all available information Exploit benefits of Modeling & Simulation Source: DoD Report to Congress, DUSD (AT&L), 8 Aug 07 4

Army Acquisition Initiative Reliability Improvements Significant number of U.S. Army systems are failing to demonstrate established reliability requirements during operational testing Effective Immediately: A System Development and Demonstration (SDD) reliability test threshold will be established Applies to programs in pre-ms B phase Applies to Information Technology systems that include hardware development Threshold to be established before entrance into MS B Must detect and report threshold breaches Must implement Reliability Best Practices Excerpts from ASA(ALT) memo, dated 6 Dec 07, Reliability of U.S. Army Materiel Systems Claude M. Bolton, Jr. ASA(ALT) 5

Army T&E Developmental Testing - to find faults, implement corrective actions, and mature the design - to confirm technical capabilities/functionality and manufacturability Operational Testing - to provide information on integration of the Soldier, the support system, training & doctrine, and materiel in an operational environment - to confirm/demonstrate operational suitability requirements 6

Benefits of DT/OT Integration Reduced Risk Ensure capabilities are tied to mission Systems deficiencies identified Test data is shared Reduced Cost Sharing resources Eliminate duplicative testing Early deficiency identification and correction Reduced Acquisition Timeline Combined vs. sequential testing Sharing of high-demand testing assets 7

Strategic Organizational Construct FROM: TO: HQDA ATEC?? A DT B OT C HQ ATEC DTC OTC AEC Saves Time & Money Does Not Compromise Org Independence PEO A B C ATEC 8

DT/OT Integration in the Army Ballistic Missile Defense DT/OT Integration is widely used, but not in traditional definition DT is all planned, executed, and reports written by the PM (not ATEC/DTC); has significant system contractor influence/input No planned IOT, BMDS OTA arranges for Warfighter participation during DT events, using operationally realistic scenarios and DIA threat representation in HWIL and digital M&S Warfighter participation in flight and ground test events Proposed end-of-block OT will likely include contractor involvement 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORE DT / OT Integration Meter LESS 9

Technology That May Improve DT/OT Integration Ballistic Missile Defense Screen capture / frame-grabbing devices Automated data capture and transfer; data reduction Shared analysis tools 10

DT/OT Integration in the Army Medical / Business Information Technology (IT) Systems A hybrid DT/OT usually, depends on product size, system complexity, software maturity Developer Integration Testing in laboratory test bed using production-representative hardware Not ad hoc firm processes and procedures More Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) - based products in use DOT&E process for determining level of OT ranges from ATEC looking over shoulder of DT tester to a full operational test 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORE DT / OT Integration Meter LESS 11

Technology That May Improve DT/OT Integration Medical / Business Information Technology (IT) Systems Improve Modeling of networks (currently using none) Better Data Management and sharing 12

DT/OT Integration in the Army Chemical / Biological Defense All live BWA & actual CWA testing is done in chamber in DT For Oversight systems Chem/Bio Policy defines this as DT-OT Many OTs are conducted in partnership with DT Community on outdoor ranges (mostly DPG) that operates and manages instrumentation to determine simulant concentration Key effectiveness evaluation hinges on integrating results from chamber testing with actual agent and operational testing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORE DT / OT Integration Meter LESS 13

Technology That May Improve DT/OT Integration Chemical / Biological Defense Increase use of HWIL to stimulate detector sensors Real need for more accurate simulants of live agents; ALO (Agent-Like Organism) Better Data Management and sharing 14

DT/OT Integration in the Army Aviation DT/OT widely used for subsystem evaluation (i.e. CMWS) Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulations Soldiers used in DT, especially moving from component level to subsystem level tests Combined test teams - Air Worthiness Release restricts introducing operational pilots early on. Operational Testing conducted at DT ranges 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORE DT / OT Integration Meter LESS 15

Technology That May Improve DT/OT Integration Aviation Improved models and simulations; cockpit simulators Automated instrumentation for Real Time Casualty Assessments GPS- (or other geometric pairing) based RTCA systems Collaborative tools / personal communicators 16

DT/OT Integration in the Army Infantry Weapons and Soldier Systems Non-oversight ACAT III systems: usually integrated DT/OT in a single location DT done first for safety/performance check; OT phase with Soldiers follows Rapid Acquisition systems: usually just DT, then theater Some OT at technical test sites (hot/cold regions,etc) OT = Soldiers in lanes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORE DT / OT Integration Meter LESS 17

Technology That May Improve DT/OT Integration Infantry Weapons and Soldier Systems Improved commonality of instrumentation Common data reduction protocols at all test sites 18

DT/OT Integration in the Army Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) DT always for component-level building and assessment and Air Worthiness Release Soldiers used in DT, especially moving to subsystem level tests to obtain early user feedback DOTE requires greater operational realism in OT tactical personnel using approved doctrine 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORE DT / OT Integration Meter LESS 19

Technology That May Improve DT/OT Integration Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) Improved availability of models Improved Operator simulators Improved communication equipment to keep Combined Test Team in the loop Develop common instrumentation and data reduction protocols at all sites 20

DT/OT Integration in the Army Missiles (Direct / Indirect Fire) Extensive firings early without operators Extensive Developmental Testing Extensive HWIL Extensive M & S Formal OT s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORE DT / OT Integration Meter LESS 21

Technology That May Improve DT/OT Integration Missiles (Direct / Indirect Fire) Continued heavy emphasis on M&S and HWIL Improved data collection, data reduction to speed up test reports to the evaluator Better threat replication (consistency between DT & OT) and usage in virtual environment 22

C4 Systems DT/OT Integration in the Army Limited Gov t DT shock, vibration testing, interoperability; message completion rates Communications systems performance centers on stress testing and operational environment Field testing is most useful integrated event soldiers and developers working together to establish system configuration and achieve optimization Field tests are cost prohibitive need for architecture for system to create the environment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORE DT / OT Integration Meter LESS 23

C4 Systems Technology That May Improve DT/OT Integration Improve available models and simulations Invest in jammers / Electro-Magnetic Environment generators Improved data management (storage, retrieval, sharing) 24

DT/OT Integration in the Army Counter IED non-typical development process from Laboratory to DT Ranges to Theater fielding decisions based on DT results and production timelines for Jammers DTs are technical tests on instrumented ranges; PM data considered when available DOT&E has not been involved in this commodity area 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORE DT / OT Integration Meter LESS 25

Counter IED Technology That May Improve DT/OT Integration Increase investment in S&T / R&D before T&E Invest in in-line jammers / Electro-Magnetic Environment generators Better threat replication (consistency between DT & OT) Commonality of instrumentation Instrumentation sharing between DT & OT organizations 26

DT/OT Integration in the Army Tracked & Wheeled Vehicles Usually Separate DTs and OTs; higher risk more oversight OMS/MP miles driven by contract, over known, precise courses Extensive data collection in DT DOT&E wants free play in OT; freedom of maneuver, much of which can be done at Soldiers home station 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORE DT / OT Integration Meter LESS 27

Technology That May Improve DT/OT Integration Tracked & Wheeled Vehicles Increase number of instrumented test articles Embedded instrumentation Common instrumentation and data reduction protocols at all sites Technology for tracking in GPS-denied environments 28

Integration Roll-Up Ballistic Missile Defense Medical/Business IT Systems Chemical/Biological Defense Aviation Infantry Weapons/Soldier Systems Missiles (Dir/Indirect Fire) Unmanned Aerial Vehicles C4 Systems Counter IED Tracked/Wheeled Vehicles 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORE DT / OT Integration Meter LESS 29

Summary To further improve DT & OT integration, T&E technology needs include: Data management (repository, reference models) M&S advances (physical system models, simulations, networks) Network Models Distributed operations & systems Embedded / common instrumentation 30

Brian M. Simmons (410) 278-0370 brian.simmons@us.army.mil