Explanation. ( ) The principal investigator is the entity charged with ensuring protocol compliance, not the IRB/IEC. (ICH 4.5.1)

Similar documents
Roles & Responsibilities of Investigator & IRB

The SOP applies to all human subject research falling under the purview of the University of Missouri Institutional Review Board.

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

Dr. R. Sathianathan. Role & Responsibilities of Principal Investigators in Clinical Trials. 18 August 2015

Good Clinical Practice. Lisa de Blieck MPA CCRC Clinical Trials Coordination Center

ETHICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS

(Type inside gray boxes, cells will expand) A. EIGHT POINT CRITERIA for IRB Review

APEC Preliminary Workshop: Review of Drug Development in Clinical Trials

12.0 Investigator Responsibilities

A Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky

Overview ICH GCP E6(R2) Integrated Addendum

BIMO SITE AUDIT CHECKLIST

Good Clinical Practice: A Ground Level View

TITLE: Reporting Adverse Events SOP #: RCO-204 Page: 1 of 5 Effective Date: 01/31/18

Unofficial copy not valid

Investigator-Initiated Studies: When you re the Sponsor. Cheri Robert & Tammy Mah-Fraser

ETHICS COMMITTEE: ROLE, RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNCTIONS K.R.CHANDRAMOHANAN NAIR DEPARTMENT OF ANATOMY, MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER Fresno, California. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Institutional Review Board

Issues of. Informed Consent. Mitchell E. Parrish, JD, RAC, CIP Regulatory Attorney

16 STUDY OVERSIGHT Clinical Quality Management Plans

Documenting the Story of a Clinical Trial: Concept to CAPA. Lori T. Gilmartin Gilmartin Consulting LLC

DANA-FARBER / HARVARD CANCER CENTER POLICIES FOR HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH TITLE:

IRB Federal Regulations Comparison Table 4/24/01 as updated through 10/31/01

Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Supervisory Responsibilities of Clinical Investigators

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD REPORTING UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS INCLUDING ADVERSE EVENTS

The GCP Perspective on Study Monitoring

University of South Carolina. Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events Guidelines

Pablo Tebas, M.D. Joseph Quinn, RN, BSN Yan Jiang, RN, BSN, MSN

IRB review of international research. Pre-conference P1 FCPA 3 rd Party Due Diligence for Health Entities. Today

Biomedical IRB MS #

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

managing or activities.

Record or Document Type Retention Period Relevant Legal Citation(s) IRB Records: Training Records;

Study Guide for Emergency Care Clinicians. (Version /09/2014)

Drugs and Cosmetics rules, 2013 India

Version Number: 003. On: September 2017 Review Date: September 2020 Distribution: Essential Reading for: Information for: Page 1 of 13

ACTIONS/PSOP/001 Version 1.0 Page 2 of 6

Risk Assessment and Monitoring

[Enter Organization Logo] CONSENT TO DISCLOSE HEALTH INFORMATION UNDER MINNESOTA LAW. Policy Number: [Enter] Effective Date: [Enter]

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures. Education and Training on Human Subject Research Date Last Revised: OVERVIEW

Joint Statement on the Application of Good Clinical Practice to Training for Researchers

The Greenville Hospital System Office of Research Compliance and Administration HRPP Policies and Procedures

Conducting Monitoring Visits for Investigator-Initiated Trials (IITs)

Roles of Investigators in the Managements of Clinical Trials

The Queen s Medical Center HIPAA Training Packet for Researchers

For questions, concerns, to provide input, or request a consultation, call HRPP staff at

Successful FDA Inspections at Investigative Sites for Clinical Trials of Drugs and Biologics

Guidance for Institutional Review Boards, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors. Exception from Informed Consent Requirements for Emergency Research

Utilizing the NCI CIRB

FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155

CLINICAL RESEARCH POLICY

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

PROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS

STUDY TEAM RESPONSIBILITIES ORIENTATION FOR NEW CLINICAL RESEARCH PERSONNEL MODULE 2

DANA-FARBER / HARVARD CANCER CENTER STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH

Sponsor Responsibilities. Roles and Responsibilities. EU Directives. UK Law

I. HSC Review and Approval of Research Involving Children

Monitoring Clinical Trials

Margaret Huber, RN, CHRC Compliance Consultant Office of Research Compliance

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES WARNING LETTER. (b) (4) clinical investigation (Protocol entitled A Phase II, Multicenter,

Version Number: 004 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead:

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Document Development and Change Control

Title: Investigator Responsibilities. SOP Number: 1501 Effective Date: June 2, 2017

Study Responsibilities. Choose all that apply. f. Draw/collect laboratory specimens

AN OVERVIEW OF CLINICAL STUDY TASKS AND ACTIVITIES

Standard Operating Procedure IRB Review of Research Subject to the Revised Common Rule

HEALTH RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEES Human Research (HREC)

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility

Resource Document for IRB members

CLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR)

NN SS 401 NEURONEXT NETWORK STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR SITE SELECTION AND QUALIFICATION

CHAPTER 2 STUDY POLICIES

HIC Standard Operating Procedure. For-Cause Audits of Human Research Studies

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Privacy Board Standard Operating Procedures

1. Department of Defense (DoD) Human Subjects Protection Regulatory Requirements

POINT Trial Organization

Effective Date: April 2014 Revision: September 29, Executive Chair, Co-Chairs, NSHA REB Members, REB Office Personnel, Researchers.

Department of Defense Human Research Protection Program DOD INSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT FOR INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) REVIEW (IAIR)

Version 1.1, 6/30/2016 Guidance for Abbreviated IDE Requirements

QUALITY TIPS FOR CLINICAL SITES. Athena Thomas-Visel. Clinical Quality Consultant QUALITY TIPS FOR CLINICAL SITES

Toward Greater Scientific Rigor

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 325

RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT

CLIC Clinical Investigator (And Site Staff) Certification

LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH SERVICE Human Subject Protection Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Training, Site Selection and Human Subject Protection: Factors to Consider When Developing a Monitoring Plan

STUDY INFORMATION POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DEVICE (IDE) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR 812)

VCU Clinical Research Quality Assurance Assessment

Prepared by the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Protocol Development and Regulatory Compliance Department

Genesis Health System. Institutional Review Board. Standard Operating Procedures

Auditing of Clinical Trials

Human Research Ethics Review Policy

Implementing the Revised Common Rule Exemptions with Limited IRB Review

IRB 101. Rachel Langhofer Joan Rankin Shapiro Research Administration UA College of Medicine - Phoenix

Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Common Findings

INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS

Session 3 FDA Audits and Findings

Transcription:

Question 1 Explanation ( ) The principal investigator is the entity charged with ensuring protocol compliance, not the IRB/IEC. (ICH 4.5.1) ( ) According to ICH GCP an IRB/IEC should safeguard the rights, safety, and well being of all trial subjects. The IRB/IEC review is to assure, both in advance and by periodic review, that appropriate steps are taken to protect the rights and welfare of humans participating as subjects in a research study. (ICH 3.1.1) ( ) An IRB is charged with protecting the rights, safety and wellbeing of trial subjects. There is no responsibility for ensuring participation. (ICH 3.1.1) ( ) An IRB/IEC reviews Informed Consent Forms in order to ensure adequate information is provided to subjects. This is a tool for ensuring patient rights safety and well-being. Question 2 ( ) According to CFR 50.25, the first basic element is: A statement that the study involves research, an explanation of the purposes of the research and the expected duration of the subject's participation, a description of the procedures to be followed, and identification of any procedures which are experimental. ( ) The basic elements require a description of any reasonably foreseeable risks or discomforts to the subject. Additional elements enumerate that a treatment or procedure may involve risks to the subject (or to the embryo or fetus, if the subject is or may become pregnant) which are currently unforeseeable. ( ) The 4 th basic element is a disclosure of appropriate alternative procedures or courses of treatment, if any, that might be advantageous to the subject. ( ) The 7 th basic element required in an informed consent is an explanation of whom to contact for answers to pertinent questions about the research and research subjects' rights, and whom to contact in the event of a researchrelated injury to the subject. Question 3 ( ) The Kefauver-Harris Amendment is a U.S. document enacted to strengthen the FDA in regard to clinical trials and human subject protection. ( ) The Nuremburg Code is the summary ofpermissible human experiments that was never incorporated into law or regulation.

( ) GCP is based on the thirteen points of the Declaration of Helsinki. ( ) The International Conference on Harmonisation formulated the GCP guidelines that are based on the Declaration of Helsinki. Question 4 ( ) False ICH GCP is a guideline, not a law. It works within the boundaries of local law. Local law supercedes the guidelines. Question 5 ( ) A qualified physician must oversee the medical decisions of the subjects. (ICH 4.3.1) ( ) Individuals involved in the conduct of the trial must be qualified through training or education for the tasks involved. (ICH 2.8) ( ) The sponsor can train some trial related tasks. Others must be designated based on local and educational requirements. (ICH 2.8) ( ) Principal #8 of GCP states, Each individual involved in conducting a trial should be qualified by education, training and experience to conduct or perform the respective task. (ICH 2.8) Question 6 ( ) Individual members with special expertise may be invited to participate in discussions, but they will not be voting members. (ICH 3.2.6) ( ) Only members who are independent of the investigator and the sponsor should vote/provide opinion on trial related matters (ICH3.2.1) ( ) Recommended that one member is expert in a non-scientific area (ICH 3.2.1 b) ( ) At least 5 members (ICH 3.2.1 a) Question 7 ( ) The investigator may implement a deviation from, or a change in, the protocol to eliminate an immediate hazard to trial subjects without prior IRB/IEC approval. ( ICH 4.5.4) ( ) The investigator should not implement any deviation from, or changes of the protocol except where necessary to eliminate an immediate hazard to trial subjects. (ICH 4.5.2) ( ) The investigator/institution should conduct the trial in compliance with the

protocol agreed to by the sponsor The investigator/institution and the sponsor should sign the protocol, or an alternative contract, to confirm the agreement. (ICH 4.5.1) Many IRB/IECs have an institutional representative to confirm institutional ability to comply prior to approval. ( ) Correct answer is A Question 8 ( ) False. IRB procedures should specify that no subject should be admitted to a trial before the IRB/IEC issues its written approval of the trial (ICH 3.3.6). Question 9 ( ) A duly constituted IRB has reviewed and approved the investigational product protocol without an informed consent. (CFR 50.23 Section d) ( ) The subject is in a life-threatening situation and the risks are reasonable in relation to the medical condition. (CFR 50.24 Section iii). ( ) If immediate use of the test article is required to preserve the life and time is not sufficient to obtain legal representative permission, and all other criteria of approval have been satisfied, the waiver may be implemented. (CFR 50.23, sections 2 and 3). ( ) If immediate use of the test article is (opinion) required to preserve the life of the subject and time is not sufficient to obtain consent, and all others have been satisfied, the article may be used and documentation will be provided at a later time. (CFR 50.23 section b). Question 10 ( ) False. Research participants are randomized in clinical trials so that bias does not weaken the study results. The chance of a subject receiving Investigational Product is based on protocol design, not randomization. Question 11 ( ) Treating the adverse event means stopping the investigational therapy (if applicable) and treating any symptoms or sequellae. Breaking the blind is not necessary unless it might change the therapy. ( ) Most informed consents specifically state that even if a patient withdraws from the trial, the blind will not be broken. Only when the safety profile can be altered by breaking the blind, should the patient designation be revealed. ( ) Unblinding is not done until all statistical tests have been completed. Persons responsible for analysis and interpretation of results should maintain the blind

until all testing is complete. (ICH E2A Section D) ( ) When a patient s treatment might change based on knowing the treatment assignment, the need to know overcomes the need to minimize bias. Question 12 ( ) The investigator should conduct the trial in compliance with the protocol agreed to by the sponsor, which was given approval by the IRB. (ICH 4.5.1). ( ) The investigator should have available an adequate number of qualified staff and adequate facilities to conduct the trial safely and properly. (ICH 4.2.3) ( ) The sponsor should expedite the reporting to all concerned and to the regulatory authorities of all ADRs. (ICH 5.17). ( ) During and following subject participation, the investigator should ensure that adequate medical care is provided to a subject for any adverse events. (ICH 4.3.2) Question 13 ( ) Sponsor is responsible for written SOPs to ensure that trials are conducted and data are generated in accordance with the protocol (ICH 5.1.1) ( ) Prior to entering an agreement with the investigator, the sponsor should provide the investigator with the protocol and an up-to-date Investigator Brochure (ICH 5.6.2) ( ) Providing adequate medical care is an investigator responsibility (ICH 4.3.1) ( ) The sponsor is responsible for ongoing safety evaluation of the investigational product(s). (ICH 5.16) Question 14 ( ) Summary of findings from non-clinical studies that potentially have clinical significance and from clinical trials that are relevant to the trial. (ICH 6.2.2) Only including positive trials does not follow the guidelines. ( ) Description of the population to be studied. (ICH 6.2.6) ( ) A detailed description of the objectives and the purpose of the trial. (ICH 6.3) A detailed description of the trial design that should include endpoints and other pertinent descriptions. (ICH 6.4) ( ) A statement that the trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, GCP and applicable regulatory requirements. (ICH 6.2.5)

Question 15 ( ) False The guidance does not bind the FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statute, regulations or both. (Introduction E6 GCP Guidance)