Workforce Development Training Fund ANNUAL REPORT Fiscal Year 2006

Similar documents
STATE OF WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT TRAINING FUND 2007 ANNUAL REPORT

Testimonials. ~ Karissa Kersey, Benefits and Compensation Manager, Trihydro, Corporation

Economic Impact of the proposed The Medical University of South Carolina

See footnotes at end of table.

BUSINESS REGISTRATION POLICY. The County of Northern Lights believes in assisting and promoting local business developments.

Southeast Region Labor Market Analysis

WorkSource Georgia: Yesterday Today Tomorrow

UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING BUDGET PRIMER UW Office of Academic Affairs and Budget Office Last update April 2013

2007 Survey Report on Farmer Entrepreneurship

Litchfield Hillsborough County, New Hampshire

LOCATION QUOTIENTS. Berks, Chester, Lebanon, Lancaster, Lehigh, Montgomery, Schuylkill counties

Where. Number of Vacancies. Employment in Occupation 2,105 2,100 1,557 1,429 1,

May 16, 2018 Outreach Webinar TIME S UP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND

Saskatchewan Polytechnic Employer Survey Graduates. September 2016

March WORKER TRAINING GRANTS for WISCONSIN HEALTH SCIENCE, HEALTH CARE, AND RELATED OCCUPATIONS. Award Amount: $5,000 to $400,000

Department of Business & Industry

ARIZONA JOB TRAINING PROGRAM PROGRAM RULES & GUIDELINES (RULES) 1

Kentucky Education and Workforce Development Cabinet releases April 2018 unemployment report

Economic Development Strategic Plan Executive Summary Delta County, CO. Prepared By:

Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report

Job Vacancies in the Portland Tri-County Area Lynn Wallis, Workforce Analyst, (971)

MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY 2016 YEAR IN REVIEW PARRY SOUND DISTRICT MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY YEAR IN REVIEW - PARRY SOUND DISTRICT

MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY 2016 YEAR IN REVIEW NIPISSING DISTRICT MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY YEAR IN REVIEW

Small Business Assistance Program Guidelines

THE State of North Carolina

CITY OF PROVIDENCE: ECONOMIC CLUSTER STRATEGY. Presentation to City Council Final Analysis November 18 th, 2015

NOTICE OF ADOPTION RULE Arizona Job Training Program: Program Rules and Guidelines (the Rule)

Results of the Clatsop County Economic Development Survey

Executive Summary. Almost one-fourth of those job vacancies went unfilled for two months or longer.

SBA s Size Standards Analysis: An Overview on Methodology and Comprehensive Size Standards Review

2017 Workforce Education Conference

Saskatchewan Industry Labour Demand Outlook, Ministry of the Economy Fall 2017

Job Development Investment Grant (JDIG) N.C. Gen. Stat. 143B to 143B

Incentive Guidelines Start-Up Finance

Incentive Guidelines Start-Up Finance

Employment and Wage Trends 3 rd Quarter 2015 for the Healthcare Sector by Parish

City of St. Petersburg Arts and Culture Grant Program Guidelines General Support Grant

Pelham Hillsborough County, New Hampshire

CCAM Certified Control Account Manager Credential Certification Program Registration Form

Job Training Incentive Pilot Program Guide

Incentive Guidelines Knowledge Transfer

Fax: (402) Telephone: (402) Website:

EDUCATION ENROLMENT FORM EXPRESSION OF INTEREST

Serving the Community Well:

Help Wanted in Oregon: Results from the Summer 2014 Job Vacancy Survey

BELLVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION GENERAL INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS

NOTICE OF ADOPTION RULE NO

K-12 Statewide Longitudinal Data System, AH

Executive Summary. Top 25 Jobs in Demand

I-605 CORRIDOR HOT SPOT INTERCHANGES

2018 SOX & Internal Controls Professionals Group State of the SOX/Internal Controls Market Survey

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 2 HOUSE BILL 68* Committee Substitute Favorable 4/19/17. Short Title: BRIGHT Futures Act.

Guidelines for the Virginia Investment Partnership Grant Program

Snohomish County Labor Area Summary April 2017

Inclusive Local Economies Program Guidelines

URBAN VITALITY JOB CREATION PILOT PROGRAM

Executive Summary. In May 2008, there were an estimated 10,924 job vacancies in the TOC/OWA region.

APPENDIX A. List of Economic Sectors

Inventory: Vision and Goal Statements in Existing Statewide Plans 1 Developing Florida s Strategic 5-Year Direction, 29 November 2011

NJ DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF TRAVEL & TOURISM DESTINATION MARKETING ORGANIZATION (DMO) GRANT PROGRAM HANDBOOK

KRS Global Biotechnology Inc. Catalyst Fund Application (TTC) to Governor s Office Of Economic Development

Creative Arts Industry Incentives

Farm Energy and Agri-Processing Program Terms and Conditions

BUSINESS PLAN. Fiscal Years 2018 & [It s a competitive world. Train for it.]

BC Fires Support to Small Business and First Nations Cultural Livelihoods Program Additional Financial Assistance Application Instructions

Digital Economy.How Are Developing Countries Performing? The Case of Egypt

Transition Review of the Greater Fort Lauderdale Convention & Visitors Bureau

Grant Application for Funding for 2018 Projects

GUILFORD COUNTY WDB. SMALL Business Training. Grant

51 million EU funding for enterprises

WHAT DO ONLINE JOB POSTINGS REVEAL ABOUT THE YORK REGION & BRADFORD WEST GWILLIMBURY S LABOUR MARKET?

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

SAMPLE DOCUMENT. Implementation or operational plan

BUSINESS INCUBATION COMMUNITY READINESS ASSESSMENT Dalton-Whitfield County. October 17, 2012 Erin Rosintoski

July 1, June 30, 2019

Report on Ohio Means Internships & Co-ops (OMIC) Award Strategy, Performance, & Financial Metrics

Entrepreneurs Programme - Supply Chain Facilitation

2017 Awards Entry Information Pack

Long-Range Plan February 8, 2018 February 8, 2023

SOUTHERN FLORIDA MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY GROUP MEETING

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No SENATE BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO. with committee amendments DATED: NOVEMBER 9, 2015

FUND Application. The Valley Center Opportunity Zone A Community Development Corporation

DORAL BUSINESS COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL BUSINESS SEMINAR

Application Submission Webinar. Application Training Webinar

NOTICE OF RULE MAKING. Arizona Commerce Authority Rule Notice of Rule Making No

Guidelines for the Major Eligible Employer Grant Program

Department Edmonton Economic Development Corp.

Report of the Auditor General to the Nova Scotia House of Assembly

Economic Contribution of the North Dakota University System in 2015

HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 15, SYNOPSIS Creates Joint Apprenticeship Incentive Grant Program.

Attraction Development Grant Program Guidelines & Application

Area. Market. Average Establishments. Monroe Region. makes up. o 14.77% in Madison

The following is a summary of the economic development activities reported by these contracted community organizations for calendar year 2011.

COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Multi-Sport Hosting* Capacity Building Sport Development / Inclusion

Jobs Demand Report. Chatham / Kent, Ontario Reporting Period of April 1 June 30, July 7, 2015

Demonstration Projects to End Childhood Hunger 2016 Annual Report to Congress

Health Care Sector Profile for the Lake Charles RLMA. Employment and Wage Trends 4th Quarter 2015 for the Health Care Sector by Parish

Chapter 5 Planning for a Diversified Economy 5 1

Transcription:

Workforce Development Training Fund ANNUAL REPORT Fiscal Year 2006 Wyoming Department of Workforce Services

State of Wyoming Department of Workforce Services Office of the Director 122 W. 25 th St. Herschler 2E Cheyenne, WY 82002 Director Kathy Emmons Governor Dave Freudenthal January 10, 2007 Attached you will find the FY 2006 Annual Report for the Workforce Development Training Fund (WDTF). I m confident that you ll be pleased with the direction the Program has taken, and its positive role in Wyoming s economic development. During 2006, the WDTF has made a number of noteworthy accomplishments. While these accomplishments are described in detail within the report narrative, I would like to point out two that made a significant impact on the State during this reporting period. Efforts in FY 2006 resulted in increased funding for the FY 2007 2008 biennium from the Legislature for the WDTF. This increased operating revenue will allow the WDTF to market itself, and reach more businesses and workers. The increase in occupational proficiency due to increased training will help develop Wyoming s workforce and stimulate healthy business competition and economic growth. Internal process improvements for the WDTF resulted in the ability to effectively handle an anticipated large increase in applications and contracts without loss of accountability or customer service. Thank you again for your commitment to the success of the WDTF. Sincerely, Kathy Emmons Tel 307-777-8650 Fax 307-777-5857 www.wyomingworkforce.org

We are pleased to present this annual report for the Department of Workforce Services (DWS), Workforce Development Training Fund (WDTF). In December 2003, DWS and its WDTF Advisory Workgroup began reviewing the operation of the program and developing new program rules, policies and procedures that would assure the program was business-driven, more efficient and more accountable. At the conclusion of the second year of operation under the new rules, WDTF had established itself as an important tool for Wyoming businesses and workforce development. The established intent of WDTF is to: Be accountable and yield measurable benefits. Foster economic development in Wyoming. Strengthen Wyoming businesses. Support Wyoming employers and workers in Wyoming. Enhance and develop the skills of the Wyoming workforce. Provide training beyond what would normally occur. Encourage employers to invest in training their workers. Support keeping Wyoming workers in the state. Promote wage progression for workers after training. This report will describe the accomplishments of WDTF in Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 and provide a preview of future plans. WDTF Business Training Grants Business Training Grants again served a wide range of businesses and employees in Wyoming in FY 2006. Below are the highlights of statistical information derived from the updated FY 2006 Business Training Grants Performance Summary, which is attached to this report. Total businesses served: 243 Top two sizes of businesses served: 1 to 5 employees 30.5% Over 100 employees 19.3%. Top three industries served: Healthcare and Social Assistance 17.3% Professional and Technical Services 15.2% Other Services (Except Public Administration) 11.5% Total employees trained: 2,513 Top three occupations for employees trained: Business and Financial Operations 18.0% Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations 15.1% Management 12.5% Total amount of approved grants: $1,612,716 Average grant amount approved (by contract): $2,536 Average grant amount approved (by trainee): $642 Department of Workforce Services 1 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

During FY 2006, 636 grants were approved totaling $1,612,716, which includes both Grants for Existing Positions and Grants for New Positions. Under the program rules for Grants for Existing Positions, there is a mandatory business contribution of 40% of the allowable training expenses which does not include trainee wages or fringe benefits. This match is not required for Grants for New Positions. Businesses utilizing Grants for Existing Positions paid business matching funds for the training of ($974,753) or 37.7% of the cost of the total for both types of grants. The chart below shows the usage of Business Training Grants between FY 1998 and FY 2006. Business Training Grants Number of Grants Approved Amount Number of Trainees Number of Businesses FY 1998 3 $149,827 356 3 FY 1999 6 396,891 412 6 FY 2000 18 243,224 154 16 FY 2001 57 673,374 543 39 FY 2002 191 827,283 940 121 FY 2003 531 2,315,466 2,064 250 FY 2004 partial year 239 971,876 881 140 FY 2005 under new rules 727 2,164,004 3,018 245 FY 2006 636 1,612,716 2,513 243 Totals 2,406 $9,295,413 10,739 1,060 Customer Satisfaction Surveys To assure WDTF is managed from a customer-driven perspective, a customer satisfaction survey was implemented on September 1, 2005. The survey consists of two parts- one for employers, focused mainly on the WDTF application and contract process and the training s applicability to the business; and one for employees, which mainly explores the value of the training at the employee level. The survey results were very positive overall, showing that the program is consistent and gives businesses the ability to utilize the program in an efficient and positive manner: 82% of the employer respondents stated that they had an excellent overall experience with the Business Training Grant(s) that they received. 84% of the employees surveyed indicated that the information learned at the training could be applied to their jobs. In response to suggestions provided by customers on the survey, WDTF staff has changed procedures and policy to improve the customer experience and enhance Department of Workforce Services 2 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

accountability of the program. A copy of the full results from the Customer Satisfaction Surveys for Employers and Employees are attached. Marketing of the Business Training Grant Programs In the spring of 2006, a comprehensive marketing plan for Business Training Grants was developed to target the top five high growth industries through mass mailing and personal contacts. The top five high growth industries targeted were: Manufacturing; Construction; Retail Trade; Accommodation and Food Services and Other Services. Examples of Other Services include auto repair, personal care, cleaning, etc. WDTF anticipates a substantial increase in the number of businesses that use the program as well as a more diverse customer base as a result of this marketing effort. The marketing plan will be implemented and the results reported in the FY 2007 annual report. Collections of Outstanding Accounts WDTF staff aggressively pursued repayments from businesses who owed money back to the fund during FY 2006. Of the 636 businesses that used the WDTF, only 23 businesses owed a total of $39,093.80 2% of the total funds granted to businesses over the fiscal year. Collection efforts on the outstanding accounts will continue into FY 2007, and the WDTF staff is committed to achieving a 100% recovery rate. Informational Materials WDTF is a dynamic and customer-oriented program, and, as a result, the WDTF continually updated and distributed informational materials and updated its website about each of the programs housed within WDTF. An effort is underway to consolidate all existing promotional materials into a new, professionally-produced handout that will serve the needs of WDTF, DWS Workforce Centers, and the public for the next year. This handout is expected to be released at the same time as the WDTF Marketing Plan. Grants for New Positions Business Training Grants for New Positions experienced a significant change in its application requirements during FY 2005. On May 16, 2005, selected members of the WDTF Advisory Workgroup met in Casper, WY to discuss procedures to safeguard against potential loss of funds for Business Training Grants for New Positions. The Workgroup helped DWS to develop rules that allow DWS to require verification from a new business applicant to show the business is likely to remain viable for the duration of the Business Training Grant contract. This requirement only applies to applications for Business Training Grants for New Positions in excess of $25,000. Under the new rules, DWS may request any or all of the following: A business plan; Department of Workforce Services 3 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

Verification from a financial institution that the business is adequately funded to operate; Documentation of the sources and uses of the business s funds; Financial statements for the business; A personal guarantee from the owner(s) of the business; and/or Financial history of the business or business owner(s), credit report for the business owner(s), or other documentation that will establish a track record for the business and the ownership of the business The new rules also require approval of the application by DWS and two other entities. The application now includes a signature page for the local Economic Development organization and the Regional Director of the Wyoming Business Council to add their recommendation for approval for grants in excess of $25,000. This requirement was ready for implementation on July 1, 2006 and has greatly increased accountability and opened a progressive dialogue between DWS, its partners, and grant applicants. New Database for Business Training Grants Looking ahead to the anticipated increase in Business Training Grant applications, a state-of-the-art data storage and retrieval system was developed over a nine-month period by the Department of Workforce Services IT staff. This technology will assist the WDTF staff with accounting and will provide immediate access to all application and contract information. Previously, the paper contract file had to be retrieved before a staff member could provide information or answer questions from DWS staff or a business. This single program upgrade will revolutionize data handling for the WDTF in many ways, including: Enabling real-time data retrieval of information, which provides for better decisionmaking and customer service; Utilizing dedicated DWS IT support staff for maintenance and software upgrades; and Allowing the WDTF staff to process a substantially larger number of applications and contracts with no loss of time, and an increase in accountability. Policy and Procedures WDTF policy and procedures have been redrafted for the Business Training Grants section of the WDTF largely based on customer suggestions and lessons learned. As a result, the program will experience a marked increase in efficiency and responsiveness to business needs. By rewriting policy to fit the changing processes in use, the WDTF has had the added benefit of standardizing its procedures, so that any staff member can assume the duties of another - a huge boost in efficiency and customer service. Department of Workforce Services 4 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

Separate WDTF Funds for Pre-Obligation Pre-Obligation of WDTF Funds allows economic development entities to reserve WDTF funds during the recruitment of a new business for the purpose of training a workforce when they locate in Wyoming. Separate and dedicated funds for Pre-Obligation is the only way to offer WDTF funds during business recruitment and then assure the funds are there to fulfill the promise when the business is ready for start-up training of workers. Included in the FY 2007-2008 biennium budget for WDTF were $2,040,000 specified for Pre-Obligation purposes. Based on recommendations from the WDTF Advisory Workgroup, the Pre-Obligation Program features a new set of rules, released as Chapter 3 of WDTF. Highlights of the program include a simple application process and a six-month obligation period, which may be extended. Funding allocated to successful Pre-Obligation applications may only be disbursed through a contract for a Business Training Grant for New Positions, a Pre-Hire Economic Development Grant, or a combination of the two. This option was ready for implementation on July 1, 2006. Pre-Hire Economic Development Grants Since the retooling of the Pre-Hire Economic Development Grants, the program has become substantially more successful and accountable. In FY 2006, $500,000 was allocated to the program, with eight Pre-Hire Economic Development Grants approved by DWS. Three of the eight contracts were funded and training completed in FY 2006. The chart below provides detailed information about each of the Pre-Hire Economic Development Grants awarded in FY 2006. Training Entity Region Award Number of Trainees Contracted Average Cost per Trainee Occupations Performance Standard Met 1 Statewide $79,940.00 24 $3,331 CDL Drivers 2 Statewide $92,306.00 93 $993 Electrical Apprentices Pending* Land 3 NW $21,325.00 16 $1,333 Surveyors Pending* 4 NE $39,196.00 8 $4,900 CDL Drivers 5 NE $60,750.00 30 $2,025 CDL Drivers Pending* 6 NW $39,999.00 10 $3,999 Railcar Repairers 7 SW $62,640.00 20 $3,132 CDL Drivers Pending* 8 NE $98,605.00 16 $6,163 Construction Trades Pending* Totals $494,761.00 217 $2,280 * contract still open at the close of the fiscal year Department of Workforce Services 5 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

Workforce Development Training Fund Looking Forward Legislative Approval Of Increased Funding for FY 2007-2008 During the 2006 legislative session, the Legislature increased funding for all of the WDTF programs to a total of $8,400,000 for the biennium. Funding includes $6,000,000 in general funds and $2,400,000 in interest from the UI trust fund. As a result, WDTF will be able to provide services to an increased number of businesses and workers to strengthen the Wyoming workforce. Grant Program 2005-2006 2007-2008 Increase Percent Business $3,400,000 $4,860,000 $1,460,000 43% Training Grants Pre-Hire ED $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $500,000 50% Grants Pre-Obligation $2,040,000 $2,040,000 100% Total $4,400,000 $8,400,000 $4,000,000 91% Additional Technological Enhancements The staff of the WDTF is looking to the future by continually utilizing technology to ensure that the program is efficient and customer-driven. As a result, in the next fiscal year, the WDTF staff will update its process to incorporate an online Business Training Grant business registration and application. The online registration and application is projected to decrease the amount of time for a business to apply, obtain approval, and receive grant money; ultimately decreasing approval timelines, improving customer service, and streamlining the overall program. One of many improvements to the application process will provide the applicant with pull-down (lookup) capability for completing certain areas of the application, as well as the ability to complete the application in several sessions without losing information. The customer satisfaction surveys will also be converted to an online application in FY 2007. Digital Document Archival System WDTF plans to implement a digital archival system in the fall of 2006. The new archival system will decrease the amount of paper being housed within DWS offices by approximately 70% -- saving space, funding, and effort for DWS and the State Archives. The system will also make information readily accessible at any time to the staff of BTO greatly improving the staff s ability to provide information quickly and accurately to its customers. Department of Workforce Services 6 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

Enclosures to the WDTF Annual Report: 1- Program Performance Summary 2- Customer Satisfaction Survey Data (Employers) 3- Customer Satisfaction Survey Data (Employees) Department of Workforce Services 7 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

Summary of Applications Enclosure 1- Program Performance Summary Total Funds Requested Total Applications % Total Amount % Cancelled: 45 5.4% $513,874 20.7% Closed: 583 70.1% $1,452,263 58.5% Denied: 151 18.1% $357,297 14.4% Contracted/Open: 53 6.4% $160,453 6.5% Pending: 0 0.0% $0 0.0% Total: 832 $2,483,887 Types of Business Training Grants Approved Total % New Positions: 51 8.0% Existing Positions: 585 92.0% Total: 636 Summary of Businesses Using the WDTF Total Grant Amount Approved Average Cost per Contract Average Cost per Trainee $1,612,716 $2,536 $642 Business Type Total % Size of Business Total % t-for-profit: 55 22.6% 1-5 Employees: 74 30.5% Private: 181 74.5% 6-10 Employees: 26 10.7% County Hospital: 7 2.9% 11-25 Employees: 43 17.7% Total: 243 26-50 Employees: 27 11.1% 51-100 Employees: 26 10.7% Over 100 Employees: 47 19.3% Total: 243 Industry Total % Total % Accommodation and Food Services: 15 6.2% Manufacturing: 26 10.7% Administration and Waste Services: 1 0.4% Mining: 8 3.3% Agriculture: 4 1.6% Other Services (Except Public Administration): 28 11.5% Arts, Entertainment, Recreation: 7 2.9% Professional and Technical Services: 37 15.2% Construction: 11 4.5% Real Estate, Rental, Leasing: 3 1.2% Educational Services: 10 4.1% Retail Trade: 16 6.6% Finance and Insurance: 17 7.0% Transportation and Warehousing: 3 1.2% Health Care and Social Assistance: 42 17.3% Utilities: 4 1.6% Information: 10 4.1% Wholesale Trade: 0 0.0% Management of Companies, Enterprises: 1 0.4% Total: 243 Region Total % Total % rth Central: 21 8.6% Southeast: 34 14.0% rtheast: 41 16.9% West: 64 26.3% rthwest: 59 24.3% Total: 243 South Central: 24 9.9% Department of Workforce Services 1 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

Summary of Trainees Enclosure 1- Program Performance Summary Trainee Status Total % Type of Trainee Total % Full-time Employee: 2359 93.9% New Employee: 262 10.4% Part-time Employee: 154 6.1% Retrained Employee: 98 3.9% Total: 2513 Upgraded Employee: 2153 85.7% Total: 2513 Gender Total % Female: 1244 49.5% Benefit of Training to Business Total Male: 1269 50.5% Enhance Productivity: 0 Total: 2513 Enhance Employee Wages: 324 Enhance Effectiveness: 555 Result of Training Total % Enhance Profitability: 471 Certification: 628 25.0% Continuing Education Units: 452 18.0% Fringe Benefits offered to Trainees Total College Credit: 93 3.7% Health/Dental/Vision Insurance: 531 License: 0 0.0% Paid Holidays: 522 t Specified: 1340 53.3% Life Insurance: 413 Total: 2513 Retirement/401K: 492 Sick/Personal Time: 508 Vacation Time: 558 Trainee Occupation Total % Total % Architecture and Engineering: 116 4.6% Installation, Maintenance, and Repair: 241 9.6% Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media: 45 1.8% Legal: 5 0.2% Building and Grounds Cleaning/Maintenance: 12 0.5% Life, Physical, and Social Sciences: 20 0.8% Business and Financial Operations: 452 18.0% Management: 315 12.5% Community and Social Services: 36 1.4% Office and Administrative: 140 5.6% Computer and Mathematical: 49 1.9% Personal Care and Service: 28 1.1% Construction and Extraction: 150 6.0% Production: 237 9.4% Education, Training, and Library: 33 1.3% Protective Service: 3 0.1% Farming, Fishing, and Forestry: 9 0.4% Sales and Related: 112 4.5% Food Preparation and Serving Related: 27 1.1% Transportation and Material Moving: 6 0.2% Healthcare Practitioners and Technical: 380 15.1% Total: 2513 Healthcare Support: 97 3.9% Summary of Approved Training Training Provider Total % Location of Training Total % Total % Community College: 35 5.5% In-State: 224 35.2% $848,664 52.6% In-House Trainer: 17 2.7% Out-of-State: 412 64.8% $764,052 47.4% Private Trainer: 546 85.8% Total: 636 $1,612,716 University: 38 6.0% Total: 636 Department of Workforce Services 2 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

Enclosure 2- Customer Satisfaction Survey Data (Employers) 1. How did you hear about the Workforce Development Training Fund? 2. DWS Website, was it easy to navigate to the Business Training Grant page? DWS DWS Website Ad or Brochure Other Business Chamber Other Total Total 124 51 19 99 121 77 491 293 81 17 33 424 Other Chamber 77 121 33 Other Business 99 17 Ad or Brochure DWS Website 19 51 81 DWS 124 293 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 3. Did the WDTF webpage provide enough information on the program? 4. Were you able to easily determine the eligibility requirements for the program? Total Total 416 36 10 35 497 422 51 9 14 496 35 14 10 9 36 51 416 422 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 5. Did your training entity assist you with completion of the application? 6. Were the application forms located on the WDTF webpage easily obtained? Total Total 256 179 58 493 416 44 14 22 496 58 22 179 14 44 256 416 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Department of Workforce Services 1 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

Enclosure 2- Customer Satisfaction Survey Data (Employers) 7. Was the application easy to understand and fill out? 8. Was contact made w/the appropriate DWS staff during business hours w/minimal delay? Total Total 378 109 5 2 494 451 2 39 492 2 39 5 2 109 378 451 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 9. Were your telephone or email messages responded to within 24 hours? 10. Was the WDTF staff courteous and helpful when contacted by telephone? Total Total 430 4 59 493 449 4 6 34 493 59 34 4 6 4 430 449 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 12. Employers w/applications approved after 8/8/05 were sent an email on the process, was 11. Did you receive helpful answers to your questions? this helpful? Total Total 445 10 4 35 494 328 46 10 106 490 35 106 4 10 10 46 445 328 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Department of Workforce Services 2 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

Enclosure 2- Customer Satisfaction Survey Data (Employers) 13. How much time remained between you signing the contract & the beginning of training? 14. Were you able to understand your responsibilities under the terms of the contract? > 15 days 10-15 days 9-5 days < 15 days Total Total 350 72 21 17 14 474 466 26 0 1 493 14 Question 14 < 15 days 17 1 9-5 days 21 0 10-15 days 72 26 > 15 days 350 466 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 15. If changes had to made to training dates or trainee substitutions, were the procedures clear? 16. Were you satisfied with the training your employees received? Total Total 237 33 13 209 492 469 15 2 7 493 13 209 2 7 33 15 237 469 0 50 100 150 200 250 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 17. Did the training meet your expectations for employee skill upgrade or development? 18. Did the training improve your business's overall standing? Total Total 458 23 4 8 493 373 81 10 29 493 8 29 4 10 23 81 458 373 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Department of Workforce Services 3 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

Enclosure 2- Customer Satisfaction Survey Data (Employers) 19. Did the training enable you to raise the trainee's wages? 20. Would you use this trainer again or recommend it to another entrepreneur? Total Probably Total 154 66 163 108 491 430 32 11 21 494 108 21 163 11 66 Probably 32 154 430 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 21. Did the letter from DWS requesting the final report info arrive within 100 days after completion of the training? 22. Were the requirements for the final report easy to understand? Total Total 479 7 6 492 456 28 1 3 488 6 3 1 7 28 479 456 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 23. If questions arose on the final report requirements, was DWS staff able to answer your questions effiectively? 24. Are you satisfied that the grant monies were used appropriately and fairly? Total Total 263 3 3 214 483 482 4 0 2 488 214 2 3 0 3 4 263 482 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Department of Workforce Services 4 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

Enclosure 2- Customer Satisfaction Survey Data (Employers) 25. Rate your overall experience with the Business Training Grant you received? Excellent Good Neutral Marginal Poor Total 398 86 3 1 0 488 Poor Marginal Neutral 0 1 3 Good 86 Excellent 398 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Department of Workforce Services 5 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

Enclosure 3- Customer Satisfaction Survey Data (Employees) 1. How did you hear about the Workforce Development Training Fund (WDTF)? 2. When did you learn you would be attending the training? Workforce Center AD/ Brochure Employer Other Haven't heard of WDTF Total > 60 days before 30-60 days before 7-30 days before < 7 days before Total 69 39 1194 141 73 1516 559 606 285 59 73 1582 Haven't heard of WDTF 73 73 Other 141 < 7 days before 59 Employer 1194 7-30 days before 285 AD/ Brochure 39 30-60 days before 606 Workforce Center 69 > 60 days before 559 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 3. Was the training related to your job with the business? 4. Were the training facilities a good environment to learn in? Total Total 1340 151 21 7 1519 1362 116 19 24 1521 7 24 21 19 151 116 1340 1362 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 5. Were the objectives or end result of this training clear? 6. Was the subject or material covered during training useful to you? Total Total 1364 129 21 6 1520 1306 182 26 6 1520 6 6 21 26 129 182 1364 1306 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Department of Workforce Services 1 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report

Enclosure 3- Customer Satisfaction Survey Data (Employees) 7. Was the trainer adequately prepared for the training? 8. Was the trainer knowledgeable about the subject? Total Total 1408 74 11 27 1520 1405 46 8 27 1486 27 27 11 8 74 46 1408 1405 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 9. Did the trainer effectively teach you the subject? 10. Would you recommend this trainer to a friend or co-worker? Total Maybe Total 1304 137 18 28 1487 1290 128 33 37 1488 28 37 18 33 137 Maybe 128 1304 1290 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 11. Can you apply what you learned from this training to your job? 12. Did you consider this training worth your time? Total Total 1249 206 23 10 1488 1283 154 42 10 1489 10 10 23 42 206 154 1249 1283 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 13. Did the training result in a pay raise? Total 382 949 148 1479 148 949 382 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Department of Workforce Services 2 FY 2006 WDTF Annual Report