Executive Summary of the 2003 Population Representation in the Military Services. Highlights of Important Data Collection Changes for FY 2003

Similar documents
Population Representation in the Military Services

The Prior Service Recruiting Pool for National Guard and Reserve Selected Reserve (SelRes) Enlisted Personnel

PROFILE OF THE MILITARY COMMUNITY

Demographic Profile of the Active-Duty Warrant Officer Corps September 2008 Snapshot

Demographic Profile of the Officer, Enlisted, and Warrant Officer Populations of the National Guard September 2008 Snapshot

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM YEAR 2016/17

Officer Retention Rates Across the Services by Gender and Race/Ethnicity

The Landscape of the DoD Civilian Workforce

FY 2017 Peace Corps Early Termination Report GLOBAL

Reenlistment Rates Across the Services by Gender and Race/Ethnicity

Minnesota s Physical Therapist Assistant Workforce, 2015

FY 2015 Peace Corps Early Termination Report GLOBAL

PLEASE BE AWARE THAT YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SAVE YOUR PROGRESS, SO PLEASE PREPARE ALL OF YOUR ANSWERS AND UPLOADABLE FILES IN ADVANCE.

Population Representation in the Military Services: Fiscal Year 2011 Summary Report

PLEASE BE AWARE THAT YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SAVE YOUR PROGRESS, SO PLEASE PREPARE ALL OF YOUR ANSWERS AND UPLOADABLE FILES IN ADVANCE.

2016 Survey of Michigan Nurses

2005 Workplace and Equal Opportunity Survey of Active-Duty Members

Minnesota s Registered Nurse Workforce

DoDEA Seniors Postsecondary Plans and Scholarships SY

2015 All-Campus Career Fair Student Survey

Colorado Community College System ACADEMIC YEAR NEED-BASED FINANCIAL AID APPLICANT DEMOGRAPHICS BASED ON 9 MONTH EFC

Population Representation in the Military Services: Fiscal Year 2013 Summary Report

Youth Attitude Tracking Study

Minnesota s Registered Nurse Workforce

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs The Center for Minority Veterans (CMV)

WikiLeaks Document Release

Quality of enlisted accessions

Youth Attitude Tracking Study

Colorado Community College System ACADEMIC YEAR NEED-BASED FINANCIAL AID APPLICANT DEMOGRAPHICS BASED ON 9 MONTH EFC

2013 Workplace and Equal Opportunity Survey of Active Duty Members. Nonresponse Bias Analysis Report

Fleet and Marine Corps Health Risk Assessment, 02 January December 31, 2015

2016 FULL GRANTMAKER SALARY AND BENEFITS REPORT

Minnesota s Marriage & Family Therapist (MFT) Workforce, 2015

DIVERSITY STRATEGIC PLAN

Minnesota s Physician Workforce, 2015

YOUTH ATTITUDE TRACKING STUDY 1998: PROPENSITY AND ADVERTISING REPORT

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

The Marine Corps. Demographics Update

Appendix A Registered Nurse Nonresponse Analyses and Sample Weighting

GAO. DEFENSE BUDGET Trends in Reserve Components Military Personnel Compensation Accounts for

The Marine Corps A Young and Vigorous Force

CER Module ACCESS TO CARE January 14, AM 12:30 PM

These documents contain the questions for the Illini Career and Internship Fair. At the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

2005 Survey of Licensed Registered Nurses in Nevada

Veterans Day 2009: Nov. 11

MARINE AND FAMILY MEMBER SNAPSHOT 3 ACTIVE DUTY MARINE AND FAMILY STATUS 4 AGE 11 SERVICE TRENDS 12 SEPARATIONS 15 GENDER/ETHNICITY/EDUCATION 17

For More Information

General Services Agency

Ethnic Minorities and Women s Internship Grant Guidelines

Disclosure: Conflict of Interest. NASPGHAN CLINICAL PRACTICE SURVEY How to We Measure Up? Objectives

2017 NCLEX-PN Test Plan Overview. Kristin Singer, MSN, RN RN Test Development Associate, Examinations

H Alumni Camp Application

METHODOLOGY FOR INDICATOR SELECTION AND EVALUATION

Center for Data Analysis

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

Please note that Academic Year (AY) is defined as Fall (August/September) Semester 2015 through Summer (July/August) Semester 2016.

HOMELESS VETERAN REGISTRY NORTHWEST MINNESOTA

AVI Systems, Inc. Employment Application

ANNUAL PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT TEMPLATE FOR STATE COUNCILS ON DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES

Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center. Fleet and Marine Corps Health Risk Assessment 2013 Prepared 2014

Outcome and Process Evaluation Report County-wide Triage Teams

Home Health Quality Improvement Campaign

NEVADA County Behavioral Health. Cultural and Linguistic Proficiency Plan Annual Update FY 2016/17

Licensed Nurses in Florida: Trends and Longitudinal Analysis

UNIVERSITY CITY FIRE & RESCUE DEPARTMENT (UCFR)

Reports of Sexual Assault Over Time

Employee EEO Self-Identification Form

REPORT ON AMERICA S SMALL BUSINESSES

College Access to Healthcare Programs for Underrepresented Minorities Ohio PKAL Conference

The Impact of Scholarships on Student Performance

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL SERVICE TRAINING COMMAND 2601A PAUL JONES STREET GREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS

Identifying and Describing Nursing Faculty Workload Issues: A Looming Faculty Shortage

Additionally, the parent or legal guardian must provide the following documents upon registration of a new student:

Oklahoma Health Care Authority. ECHO Adult Behavioral Health Survey For SoonerCare Choice

Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Food, Nutrition and Wellness SFSP SPONSOR MONITOR SITE VISIT OR REVIEW FORM

Emerging Issues in USMC Recruiting: Assessing the Success of Cat. IV Recruits in the Marine Corps

AUGUST 2005 STATUS OF FORCES SURVEY OF ACTIVE-DUTY MEMBERS: TABULATIONS OF RESPONSES

Minnesota State Colleges & Universities Fact Book

2017 Florida Center for Nursing Survey of Nursing Programs

Cite as: LeVasseur, S.A. (2015) Nursing Education Programs Hawai i State Center for Nursing, University of Hawai i at Mānoa, Honolulu.

Frequently Asked Questions 2012 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC)

AVAILABILITY ANALYSIS Section 46a-68-84

Inclusion, Diversity and Excellence Achievement (IDEA) Strategic Plan

THE HUTTON JUNIOR FISHERIES BIOLOGY PROGRAM 2017 STUDENT APPLICATION Application Deadline: January 31, 2017

Scientific Research Disaster Recovery Grant (Cycle 1) Contact Information

Reserve Officer Commissioning Program (ROCP) Officer and Reserve Personnel Readiness

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

Salary and Demographic Survey Results

2018 Scholarship Application

GWINNETT COUNTY, GEORGIA

Population Representation in the Military Services: Fiscal Year 2015 Summary Report

CULTURAL COMPETENCE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

Suicide Among Veterans and Other Americans Office of Suicide Prevention

SCHOOL OF NURSING POLICY

Dobson DaVanzo & Associates, LLC Vienna, VA

Physician Workforce Fact Sheet 2016

March of Dimes Washington State Community Grants Program. Community Award Application

Capacity Building Grants: Education Contact Information

School of Public Health University at Albany, State University of New York

Research Brief IUPUI Staff Survey. June 2000 Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Vol. 7, No. 1

Transcription:

Executive Summary of the 2003 Population Representation in the Military Services This is the 30 th annual Department of Defense (DoD) report on social representation in the U.S. Military Services, including the Coast Guard. The 2003 report consists of data for DoD applicants, the active and reserve components, the Coast Guard and time-series information. This report covers fiscal year (FY) 2003 October 1, 2002 to September 30, 2003. The FY 2003 end-strength of the Active Components was slightly more than 1.4 million and the Selected Reserve (comprising the Army National Guard, Army Reserve, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, Air National Guard, and Air Force Reserve) totaled more than 875,000. Additionally, there were more than 279,000 people in the Individual Ready Reserve/Inactive National Guard. In FY 2003, approximately 176,000 non-prior service (NPS) recruits were enlisted to the Active Components and approximately 8,400 prior service recruits were returned to the Active Duty ranks. Almost 23,000 newly commissioned officers reported for active duty. Furthermore, about 64,000 recruits without and nearly 89,000 with prior military experience were enlisted in the Selected Reserve. Just over 16,000 commissioned officers entered the National Guard or Reserves in FY 2003 as well. Highlights of Important Data Collection Changes for FY 2003 Changes in reporting race and ethnicity. The fiscal year 2003 Population Representation in the Military Services report represents a sea change in the way race and ethnicity data are calculated and reported. To begin, Hispanic is no longer reported as a subset of Race/ethnicity. Prior to January 2003, race categories had three values, Black, White and Other. The Other category combined Asian/Pacific Islander and American Indian. Those who self-identified as Hispanic were defined in the data as such, without regard to race, and included as a discrete category within all race/ethnicity tables. The result was a combined race/ethnicity coding as follows. RACE/ETHNICITY White Black Hispanic Other On October 30, 1997, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published Standards for Maintaining, Collecting, and Presenting Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity. The OMB standard motivated a change in data collection policy, making it possible for federal agencies, including DoD, to collect information that reflects the increasing diversity of the United States population. Under this new guideline, DoD agencies are now required to offer respondents the option of self-identifying as one or more of the following five race categories: American Indian or Native Alaskan Asian Black or African American Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander White

A separate question asks respondents their Hispanic identity: Hispanic Not Hispanic The fiscal year 2003 Population Representation in the Military Services report is compliant with this OMB reporting guideline. As such, race and ethnicity information, when reported separately, will henceforth include the following categories: RACE/ETHNICITY White Black American Indian or Alaskan Native (abbreviated throughout the report as AIAN) Asian Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (abbreviated throughout the report as NHPI) Two or more races (abbreviated throughout the report as Two or more) ETHNICITY Hispanic Not Hispanic Impact of race/ethnic data changes on reporting. The changes in race and ethnicity data collection have created reporting issues that require some explanation. Because the new OMB guidelines took effect on January 1, 2003, most of the military services did not start collecting the new race and ethnicity information prior to the start of the 2003 calendar year (January 2003). As a result, only second through fourth quarter breakouts by these categories were available to report for the 2003 fiscal year, which began in September of 2002. In order for observers to be able to compare race/ethnicity population totals with non-race/ethnicity population totals, first quarter subtotals for the fiscal year were added. For example, Table A-1 provides the number of active component enlisted applicants from October 2002 through September 2003. Table A-3 provides race and ethnicity data for the same group of applicants, but only from January 2003 through September 2003. In order to compare totals across tables, first quarter subtotals were added to tables where race and ethnicity were reported. Also, on those race/ethnicity tables where there is a civilian comparison group, population estimates for civilians were based on January through September of 2003 data. For nonrace/ethnic tables with civilian comparison groups, civilian population estimates were based on full fiscal year totals, October 2002 through September 2003. As a result, the civilian population totals for the same age group will differ. For an example of this, compare the civilian totals on Tables B-3 and B-6. Change in use of 2000 Census data for civilian comparison groups. FY 2003 is the first year that estimates of the demographic characteristics of the civilian population are based on the 2000 Decennial Census. That census provided a more accurate (and somewhat larger) estimate of the proportion of and other minorities in the civilian population than did 2

the 1990 Census. 1 As a result of this change, the estimated proportion of Hispanic youth in the civilian population is approximately 2 percentage points higher than the estimates found in earlier editions of this report. Therefore, representation of among military accessions and members will appear reduced due to the increase in the estimated ethnic composition of the civilian comparison population. Population Representation Highlights: Active Component There has been a slight but steady decline in NPS female enlistment over the past few years. Levels for FY 2003 are similar to 1996 when women were represented at a ratio of just over 17 percent. Enlistment for NPS women reached nearly 19 percent in FY 2000 and has decreased slightly since. NPS female enlistment remains highest in the Air Force at nearly 24 percent, a drop of 4 percentage points from 28 percent NPS enlistment in 1997. The Marine Corps has enlisted NPS women at a smaller, but more constant rate of approximately 7 percent every year since 1996. The proportion of female officer accessions, on the other hand, reached an all-time high in FY 2003, at just under 21 percent. In FY 2003, were equitably represented in the military overall. In the enlisted force, were slightly overrepresented among NPS active duty enlisted accessions at 15 percent relative to 14 percent of 18-24 year-olds in the civilian population. African American officer accessions are fairly representational at just under 9 percent compared to just over 8 percent in the civilian comparison group. continue to be underrepresented, with just under 12 percent among NPS accessions compared to just over 17 percent for 18-24 year old civilians. make up 5 percent of officer accessions compared to a 7 percent ratio among 21-35 year old college graduates in the non-institutional civilian population. American Indians and Alaskan Natives are represented among NPS accessions at 2 percent, compared to 1 percent for 18-24 year old civilians. Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders represent slightly less than one-half of one percent of all NPS accessions, the same percentage as found in the comparable civilian group. Asians are underrepresented among NPS accessions at approximately 1 percent. Asians are represented in the civilian comparison group at just over 4 percent. 1 Beth Asch, Christopher Buck, Jacob Klerman, Meredith Kleykamp, and David Loughran (February 2005). What are the Barriers to the Military Enlistment of Hispanic Youth? A Look at Enlistment Qualifications. Santa Monica, CA: RAND National Defense Research Institute. 3

Geographic Representation In FY 2003, 35 percent of NPS accessions were coming from the Northeast and North Central regions of the U.S. compared to 64 percent coming from the South and West regions. See Table B-10 for a more comprehensive view of geographic representation by state. Population Representation Highlights: Reserve Component In FY 2003 NPS Selected Reserve female enlistment was 25 percent compared to 17 percent NPS active duty female enlistment. In FY 2003 18 percent of Selected Reserve officer accessions were women compared to just under 21 percent in the active component. In FY 2003 women made up 17 percent of Selected Reserve enlisted members compared to 15 percent of active duty enlisted members. As with the active duty enlisted force, were slightly overrepresented among NPS Selected Reserve enlisted accessions at 15 percent relative to just under 14 percent of 18-24 year-olds in the civilian population. represented 10 percent of the Selected Reserve officer accessions in FY 2003 compared to just over 8 percent African American college graduates in the civilian comparison population. are underrepresented to a greater extent in the Reserve components compared to the active duty components with just 9 percent among NPS accessions in the Selected Reserve compared to 12 percent for active duty NPS accessions. represent 17 percent of the comparable civilian population of 18-24 year olds. make up just over 4 percent of officer accessions into the Selected Reserve, compared to nearly 7 percent ratio among 21-35 year old college graduates in the non-institutional civilian population. American Indians and Alaskan Natives are proportionally represented among NPS Selected Reserve enlisted accessions at 1 percent, compared to 1 percent for 18-24 year old civilians. Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders represent slightly less than one-half of one percent of all NPS Selected Reserve accessions, the same percentage as found in the comparable civilian group. Asians are underrepresented among NPS Selected Reserve accessions at just over 2 percent. Asians are represented in the civilian comparison group at just over 4 percent. 4

Population Representation Highlights: Coast Guard In FY 2003 the Coast Guard s NPS active duty female enlistment was 14 percent compared to 17 percent of DoD s NPS active component female enlistment. In FY 2003 21 percent of the Coast Guard s active component officer accessions were women the same as DoD s female active component officer accessions. In FY 2003 women comprised 19 percent of the Coast Guard s NPS Reserve enlisted accessions compared to 25 percent women in DOD s NPS Selected Reserve enlistment. African American representation in the Coast Guard remains smaller compared to DOD Active and Reserve components. In FY 2003 made up nearly 8 percent of the Coast Guard s NPS active duty enlisted accessions. represented 3 percent of the Coast Guard s active component officer accessions in FY 2003. In FY 2003 African American representation among Coast Guard s Reserve enlisted accessions stood at 4 percent. Hispanic representation in the Coast Guard s NPS active component enlisted accessions was at 11 percent in FY 2003. represented slightly more than 6 percent of the Coast Guard s FY 2003 active component officer accessions. In FY 2003 Hispanic representation among Coast Guard s Reserve enlisted accessions was just under 13 percent. As with DoD s NPS Selected Reserve enlisted accessions, American Indians and Alaskan Natives are also represented in the Coast Guard s active duty NPS enlisted accessions at 1 percent in FY 2003. In FY 2003 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders represent slightly less than 1 percent of the Coast Guard s active duty NPS enlisted accessions. In FY 2003 Asians comprised 1 percent of the Coast Guard s active duty NPS enlisted accessions. 5