Seidman Research Institute W. P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University

Similar documents
Testimony of. Before the House Armed Services Committee on the Economic Consequences of Defense Sequestration. October 26, 2011

Trends in Merger Investigations and Enforcement at the U.S. Antitrust Agencies

The Impact of DoD Contracting on Maryland s Economy. Michael Siers, Senior Economist Regional Economic Studies Institute

SBA s Size Standards Analysis: An Overview on Methodology and Comprehensive Size Standards Review

10/4/2017. A 52-year promise to Americans who need care. Why now?

Serving the Community Well:

OUTSOURCING IN THE UNITED STATES MARKET

Working Paper Series

Why Are Manufacturing Job Losses So Large?

THE STATE OF THE MILITARY

Decrease in Hospital Uncompensated Care in Michigan, 2015

Rebuilding America... With American Steel

The U.S. Economic Crisis and a Revised New Jobs Tax Credit

Weathering the Storm: Challenges and Opportunities Facing Colorado Nonprofits During Recession 2009 Update

Estimating the Economic Contributions of the Utah Science Technology and Research Initiative (USTAR) to the Utah Economy

Offshoring of Jobs from Suffolk County

Questions and Answers Florida Department of Economic Opportunity Employment and Unemployment Data Release July 2018 (Released August 17, 2018)

The Economic Impacts of the New Economy Initiative in Southeast Michigan

Hospital Financial Analysis

Industry Market Research release date: November 2016 ALL US [238220] Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning Contractors Sector: Construction

Health Center Advocacy: Creating a Culture of Advocacy

REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF DEFENSE-RELATED SPENDING IN ILLINOIS

Economic Impact of Hospitals and Health Systems in North Carolina. Stephanie McGarrah North Carolina Hospital Association August 2017

Protecting WI Medicaid: Avoiding Harm in Our Communities

The Economic Impacts of Idaho s Nonprofit Organizations

Nonprofit Community Services Save the State Money

SSI/SSP Grants in California: Key Context and Recent Trends

Concept Paper for ANN VISTA Project for FY 2012 Submitted

Grants and Per Capita Funding

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Business Commons

75th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 2933 SUMMARY

Health Economics Program

The Budget: Maximizing Federal Reimbursement For Parolee Mental Health Care Summary

History of Medicaid shows the program s value in combating poverty and providing access to health

NORTH CAROLINA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD 2010 ANNUAL REPORT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

West Virginia Hospitals

Green Recovery: How Weatherization Works for Iowans Sustainable Policy Assists Struggling Families, Enhances Iowa s Economy

Full-time Equivalents and Financial Costs Associated with Absenteeism, Overtime, and Involuntary Part-time Employment in the Nursing Profession

BILLIONS IN FUNDING CUTS THREATEN CARE AT NATION'S ESSENTIAL HOSPITALS

Person-Centered Accountable Care

Policy Watch The Food Stamp Program and Welfare Reform

Cambridge: driving growth in life sciences Exploring the value of knowledge-clusters on the UK economy and life sciences sector

Comparison of ACP Policy and IOM Report Graduate Medical Education That Meets the Nation's Health Needs

Looking Forward: Health Education Priorities for America

Medi-Cal and the Safety Net California Association of Health Plans Seminar Series Medi-Cal at its Core

THE IMPACT OF BBA, BIPA and MEDICARE+CHOICE ON LTC (Why Medicare/Medicare Supplement is SHORT-TERM CARE)

GREATER PHOENIX ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT Chris Camacho, President & CEO

This memo provides an analysis of Environment Program grantmaking from 2004 through 2013, with projections for 2014 and 2015, where possible.

Implementing Health Reform: An Informed Approach from Mississippi Leaders ROAD TO REFORM MHAP. Mississippi Health Advocacy Program

The airport s non-rental car concession opportunities are detailed below.

energy industry chain) CE3 is housed at the

Background on Housing Voucher Program

Early Returns: First Year Covered California and Expanded Medi-Cal Enrollment Trends in Merced County. September 2014.

Long Term Care Briefing Virginia Health Care Association August 2009

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

2017 STATUS REPORT on

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS AND APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

NURSING. Executive Summary. Can It Remain a Source of Upward Mobility Amidst Healthcare Turmoil?

Qualified Facility Income Tax Credit Program

Snohomish County Labor Area Summary April 2017

BOARD OF TRUSTEES MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES BOARD ACTION. FY2006 Operating Budget and FY2007 Outlook

Regional Health Care as an Economic Generator Economic Impact Assessment Dothan, Alabama Health Care Industry

THE HEALTHCARE CLUSTER

Managed care consulting services

2015 Lasting Change. Organizational Effectiveness Program. Outcomes and impact of organizational effectiveness grants one year after completion

MANAGED CARE CONSULTING SERVICES

Economic Analysis of Proposals to Limit the Municipal Bond Market: 501(c)(3) Issuance

Employment Ontario Information System (EOIS) Case Management System

Jobs Demand Report. Chatham-Kent, Ontario Reporting Period of October 1 December 31, February 22, 2017

Economic Impact of the proposed The Medical University of South Carolina

Value-based Care Report. February How Value-based Care is improving quality and health.

NORTH CAROLINA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY. A. Robert Kucab Executive Director

Medicaid Restoration, and New Technology for Public Assistance in Arizona

AMN Healthcare Investor Presentation

QUARTERLY MONITOR OF CANADA S ICT LABOUR MARKET

ARIZONA JOB TRAINING PROGRAM PROGRAM RULES & GUIDELINES (RULES) 1

OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING

PATIENTS PERSPECTIVES ON HEALTH CARE IN THE UNITED STATES: NEW JERSEY

Residential Technology Checkup

HIV/AIDS Care in a Changing Healthcare Landscape. Medicaid Expansion

Analysis of 340B Disproportionate Share Hospital Services to Low- Income Patients

FIVE YEAR FORECAST FY THROUGH FY

Survey of Health Care Employers in Arizona: Home Health Agencies, 2015

Quick Facts VIP Survey: Trends in Federal Contracting for Small Businesses 1

U.S. Research and Development Funding and Performance: Fact Sheet

TASMANIAN ELECTION POLICY IMPERATIVES

Medicaid and Block Grant Financing Compared

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF $1.4 BILLION OF UNIVERSITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Modernizing Medicaid DSH: Policy Options To Ensure Vital Support for Essential Hospitals

Not to be completed by paper. Please complete online.

Family and Community Support Services (FCSS) Program Review

KEY FACTS ON CORPORATE FOUNDATIONS

Overview...2. Example Grantee...3. Getting Started...4 Registration...4. Create a Scenario... 6 Adding Background Information.. 6 Adding Spending...

Issue Brief February 2015 Affordable Care Act Funding:

Health Care Industry Economic Analysis

Final Recommendations on the Update Factors for FY 2017

Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program: An Overview

Area. Market. Average Establishments. Monroe Region. makes up. o 14.77% in Madison

The Opportunities and Challenges of Health Reform

Direct Hire Agency Benchmarking Report

Transcription:

Seidman Research Institute W. P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University September 22, 2017 IMPACT OF GRAHAM-CASSIDY HEALTH CARE PLAN ON ARIZONA S ECONOMY Summary Arizona health care funding in the first year of the Graham-Cassidy health care plan will decrease by $1.7 billion, leading to a loss of more than 20,000 jobs (11,000 in health care) and a drop in Gross State Product of $1.9 billion. Similar impacts will be felt each year until a major shock to the economy in 2027 when the block grant program ends and funding is cut by an estimated $8.0 billion. As health care cuts spread across the entire economy, Arizona will lose over 76,000 private jobs in that year, relative to a no change scenario, some 8,000 more jobs than were lost in the first year (2008) of the recession. For the block grant period 2020-2026, the state will lose a total of $10.3 billion in federal health care funding. Private employment will average 18,000 fewer jobs per year than under current law, equivalent to the combined Arizona employment of Intel and Honeywell Aerospace. For the entire period 2020-2036, federal funding losses for health care support will be $133 billion, the cumulative Arizona Gross State Product will be $125 billion smaller, and lost personal income will be $93 billion due to Arizona job losses in the general economy exceeding one million worker years. Background The Graham-Cassidy health care plan is intended to repeal or change fundamental elements of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), beginning in 2020. The proposed legislation would eliminate ACA Medicaid expansion funding and marketplace insurance subsidies (such as premium tax credits for individuals), replacing them with a block grant program to states (the Market-Based Health Care Grant Program). The bill also contains provisions that convert federal funding for the traditional Medicaid program from an openended model to a capped amount. 1

The block grant program to states would be in effect from 2020-2026. A key feature of the program is flexibility for states in the use of funds, such as to assist with premium costs or make direct payments for health care services. The bill does not authorize the block grant program to continue after 2026, creating a fiscal cliff if federal funding is withdrawn. Because of the complexity of the legislation, the Congressional Budget Office will be unable to provide a full analysis ( scoring ) of the bill before the expected vote. However, public interest research groups have produced preliminary information on the impact of the bill, including projections of federal dollars to be spent and amounts to be received by the states. The most comprehensive analysis is by Avalere, a private research firm specializing in healthcare systems. Avalere researchers estimate the block grant program would provide $215 billion less funding to states from 2020-2026 than projected federal spending under current law (http://avalere.com). Over the entire period 2020-2036, the bill is projected to reduce total federal funding to states by $4.1 trillion. Not only will total federal funding under the bill be reduced, but also funding will be reallocated from states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA (including Arizona) to those states that did not. According to the Avalere study, Arizona will lose $11 billion in federal funding from 2020-2026. Independent calculations by the Arizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee, using a similar methodology, estimate Arizona s loss in federal funding as $10.3 billion. The Avalere study analyzed the period after the grant program ends in 2026 and estimated the 2020-2036 losses to Arizona as $133 billion in federal funds that will not be available to the state for health care. By accepting funding for Medicaid expansion, Arizona added more than 400,000 to the insured population and improved the quality of medical services available in the state. Passage of the Graham-Cassidy bill is expected to reverse a significant proportion of these gains, simply because fewer funds would be available for health care. Moreover, funding cuts could lead to reductions in benefits and stricter eligibility rules as cost-saving efforts, in Arizona as well as many other states. Impact on Arizona This report examines another aspect of the impact of the Graham-Cassidy bill on Arizona the effects on key economic indicators including employment, gross product, and incomes. As federal funding is reduced, health care employment and worker incomes will decline, leading to ripple effects throughout the Arizona economy. While many Arizona citizens will see losses in health care coverage and quality, others will face the possibility of layoffs and loss of employer insurance coverage. In Arizona and nationally, health care is the largest employment sector (based on NAICS two-digit classifications). Arizona health care in 2015 consisted of 14,011 establishments that provided employment for 387,928 workers. Earnings for workers in Arizona health 2

care were $22.4 billion in 2015. Overall, health care establishments make up 9.6 per cent of all private establishments in Arizona, health care accounts for 12.6 percent of private employment, and generates 15.1 percent of earnings received in the state. Arizona health care accounts for twice as many jobs as manufacturing and nearly three times as many jobs as construction, long seen as a mainstay of the Arizona economy. Health care accounted for one out of every five new private jobs added in Arizona in 2016 (13,550 health care jobs vs. 66,890 private sector jobs). It is clear that legislation that undermines health care spending will have a significant impact on the overall Arizona economy. The impacts on the Arizona economy of federal funding reductions expected under the Graham-Cassidy bill are shown in the accompanying table. Each entry in the table for each year represents the difference between a no change scenario and the annual change under the Graham-Cassidy funding reductions. The total for each column is the cumulative value over the entire period. Estimates are from the REMI forecasting model for Arizona. Figures for federal funds lost from 2020-2026 are as estimated by the Arizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee. Funds lost from 2027-2036 were taken from the Avalere report. The average annual Arizona loss in health care funds from 2020-2026 is $1.5 billion. The total Arizona loss during the block grant period 2020-2026 is $10.3 billion. The average annual Arizona loss after 2026, when the block grant period ends, is $12.3 billion. The total Arizona loss during the 2020-2036 period is $133 billion. Health care employment in the table represents combined medical offices, hospitals, nursing facilities, and social assistance such as drug abuse counseling. In 2020, the reduction in federal funding of $1.7 billion leads to health care employment that is reduced by 11,271 for that year. Annual reductions in health care decline somewhat until the end of the block grant program in 2026. A major shock to the economy occurs in 2027 as the block grant program ends and an estimated $8.0 billion is withdrawn from the Arizona spending stream, leading to a loss of 44,619 health care jobs. As the differential grows between current law funding and Graham-Cassidy funding ($16 billion annual gap by 2035), annual health care jobs are reduced by some 60,000 to 70,000 from the no change scenario. The health care funding reductions affect the health care industry first, but then spread across the economy. In 2020, when 11,271 health care jobs are lost, there are also job losses in construction (2,799), retail trade (1,447), and all other categories. After the end of the block grant program in 2026, as the Graham Cassidy plan is written, the funding losses to Arizona become so great as to cause private employment to diverge from the no change scenario by more than 100,000 jobs each year. 3

Impact of the Graham-Cassidy Bill on the Arizona Economy 2020-2036 Year Federal Funds* Health Care Employment All Private Employment Gross State Product * Personal Income* 2020 -$1,700-11,271-21,567 -$1,891 -$1,262 2021 -$1,600-10,297-21,022 -$1,943 -$1,271 2022 -$1,600-9,998-20,921 -$1,956 -$1,348 2023 -$1,500-9,165-18,925 -$1,843 -$1,314 2024 -$1,400-8,334-16,586 -$1,680 -$1,239 2025 -$1,300-7,440-14,239 -$1,503 -$1,120 2026 -$1,200-6,649-12,289 -$1,274 -$1,033 2027 -$8,000-44,619-76,123 -$7,509 -$5,284 2028 -$9,000-49,039-86,078 -$8,816 -$6,207 2029 -$10,000-52,864-94,146 -$9,911 -$7,101 2030 -$11,000-56,315-100,152 -$10,778 -$7,859 2031 -$12,000-59,317-104,193 -$11,541 -$8,514 2032 -$13,000-62,341-107,391 -$12,169 -$9,105 2033 -$13,700-63,764-107,804 -$12,492 -$9,522 2034 -$14,000-63,292-104,952 -$12,460 -$9,703 2035 -$16,000-70,307-113,944 -$13,749 -$10,767 2036 -$16,000-68,003-109,608 -$13,536 -$10,757 Total -$133,000-653,014-1,129,941 -$125,052 -$93,406 *Dollar values are in millions of 2017 dollars Source: Funding cuts from Arizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee and Avalere; impacts from REMI forecasting model for Arizona. Gross State Product and personal income in Arizona follow a similar pattern. Gross State Product falls by $1.9 billion in 2020, the first year of the plan, and personal income declines by $1.3 billion. By 2036, the cumulative loss in Gross State Product exceeds $125 billion and personal income is $93 billion smaller over the period. The REMI Model REMI is a dynamic forecasting and analysis tool, developed by Regional Economic Models Inc., which simultaneously serves as an input-output, an econometric, and a computable general equilibrium model. It contains detailed industries and incorporates complete inter-industry relationships. It is widely recognized by the business and academic communities as the leading economic modeling tool available. 4

The specific REMI models used for this analysis is Policy Insight Model PI+ version 2.0.3 of the Arizona state-level economy leased from Regional Economic Models Inc. by a consortium of State agencies, including Arizona State University, for economic forecasting and policy analysis. Sources 1. Graham-Cassidy Bill Legislative Text: https://www.cassidy.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/lyn17709.pdf 2. Avalere Report: http://avalere.com/expertise/life-sciences/insights/graham-cassidy-heller-johnsonbill-would-reduce-federal-funding 3. Arizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee Analysis: http://www.azleg.gov/jlbc/graham-cassidyanalysis.pdf This report was commissioned by: Children s Action Alliance is an independent voice for Arizona children at the state capitol and in the community. CAA works to improve children s health, education, and security through information and action. Visit us online at www.azchildren.org 5