Occupational Survey Report AFSC 2A6X3 Aircrew Egress Systems

Similar documents
Air Education and Training Command

Occupational Survey Report AFSC 4H0X1 Cardiopulmonary Laboratory

Occupational Survey Report AFSC 4A1X1 Medical Materiel

Air Education and Training Command

Occupational Survey Report AFSC 1C0X1 Airfield Management

Occupational Survey Report AFSC 1T0X1 Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape Operations

Air Education and Training Command

Occupational Survey Report AFSC 4A0X1 Health Services Management

Air Education and Training Command

Air Education and Training Command

Air Education and Training Command

Air Education and Training Command

U&TW Briefing. Air Education and Training Command. Manpower AFSC 3U0X1, 38MX & Management and Program Analysis OS 343

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Air Education and Training Command

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

Wildland Fire Assistance

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

Development of a Hover Test Bed at the National Hover Test Facility

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

USAF Hearing Conservation Program, DOEHRS Data Repository Annual Report: CY2012

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Improving Safety of Demil Operations Through Automation. Mark M. Zaugg July 14, 2010

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

AMCOM Corrosion Program

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

MCAS BEAUFORT SUSTAINABLE RANGES BRIEF MCAS BEAUFORT COMMUNITY PLANS AND LIAISON OFFICE (CP&L)

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

CAREER FIELD EDUCATION AND TRAINING PLAN

OCCUPATIONAL SURVEY REPORT

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

OCCUPATIONAL SURVEY REPORT

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Choose to Lose. Tammy Lindberg, Lt Col, USAF, BSC

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

United States Air Force 423 SCMS Hydraulic Actuator Chrome Replacement

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

Report Documentation Page

Presented to: Presented by: February 5, Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity


Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

U.S. ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Mission Task Analysis for the NATO Defence Requirements Review

Current & Future Prospective Payment System

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

Information Technology

Tannis Danley, Calibre Systems. 10 May Technology Transition Supporting DoD Readiness, Sustainability, and the Warfighter. DoD Executive Agent

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

PEO Missiles and Space Overview Briefing for the 2010 Corrosion Summit February 2010 Huntsville, AL

Joint Basing and Explosives Safety from the US Navy Perspective

RESPONDING TO COMPOSITE FIRES: FIRST RESPONDER TRAINING MODULE

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

HOWARD G. WHITE, TIMOTHY TOBIK, RICHARD MABRY Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Transcription:

Sustaining the Combat Capability of America s Air Force Occupational Survey Report AFSC Aircrew Egress Systems 2Lt Nora Alanis 20 January 2004 I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 20 JAN 2004 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Occupational Survey Report AFSC Aircrew Egress Systems 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Air Force Occupational Measurement Squadron Randolph AFB, TX 78150 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM001595., The original document contains color images. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 34 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

AFOMS/OA 1550 Fifth Street East Randolph AFB, TX 78150 DSN 487 6811 https://www-r.omsq.af.mil/oa/oaproducts.htm I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Survey background Survey results Implications 3

Homogeneous job structure with one cluster and five jobs Technical tasks are performed throughout all skill levels Career ladder documents well supported by survey data Job satisfaction indicators are very good 4

Maintain aircraft egress systems including ejection seats, canopies, hatches and modules; subsystems; and related support equipment Advise on and solve installation, maintenance, and repair problems Perform scheduled and unscheduled maintenance on egress systems as well as perform integrity inspections of the escape system 5

AFSC-awarding course 361 TRS, Sheppard AFB TX J3ABR2A633-022, Aircrew Egress Systems Apprentice Course, 6 weeks, 2 days 11 semester hours for CCAF Programmed TPR Programmed Elimination Rate FY04: 220 students FY04: 5% FY05: 216 students FY05: 3% 6

Last Occupational Survey Report (OSR): May 00 Current survey developed: Aug Dec 02 Sheppard AFB TX Edwards AFB CA Nellis AFB NV Luke AFB AZ AIRCREW EGRESS January 2004 (Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited 7

Survey initiated to obtain data to: Evaluate current classification and training documents Support promotion test development Current survey data collected : Jan - May 03 Components surveyed: Active Duty: 3-, 5-, and 7-Skill Levels Guard: 3-, 5-, and 7-Skill Levels Reserve: 3-, 5-, and 7-Skill Levels AIRCREW EGRESS January 2004 (Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited) 8

AD AFRC ANG Total Assigned* 780 52 270 1,102 Mailed Out 629 42 241 912 Sample 373 21 132 526 Usable Returns 64% 50% 55% 58% Average time in career field for AD: 6 years 7 months Average TAFMS for AD: 7 years 1 month Percent of AD in first enlistment: 35% * Assigned as of Jan 03 9

E-1 - E-3 E-4 E-5 E-6 E-7 E-8 Assigned** 33% 13% 24% 17% 11% * Sample 29% 14% 24% 20% 12% 0% *Indicates less than 1% **Assigned as of Jan 03 Note: Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding 10

Command Assigned %* Sample % ACC 40 39 ANG 25 25 PACAF 10 10 USAFE 9 9 AETC 9 9 AFRC 5 4 AFMC 2 3 * Assigned as of Jan 03 Note: Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding 11

SUPERVISION JOB (3%) NOT GROUPED (12%) (N=526) INSPECTION JOB (2%) NON-ACES MAINTENANCE JOB (5%) TRAINING JOB (2%) ACES MAINTENANCE JOB (76%) 12

Inspect ejection seat components Inspect ejection seat lap-belts Remove or install ejection seats Arm or dearm ejection seats Identify egress systems explosive component service-life or shelf-life Inspect inertia reel components Inspect ballistic hoses ACES Maintenance Job Training Job Non-ACES Maintenance Job Inspection Job Supervision Job 100% 13

ACES MAINTENANCE JOB (N=399) Remove or install ACES system emergency oxygen bottles Remove or install ACES system STAPAC assembly Remove or install ACES system sequence-start switches Perform operational checks on ejection seat linkages, such as D-rings or ejection control handles 76% TRAINING JOB (N=8) Develop formal course curricula, plans of instruction, or specialty training standards Develop or procure training materials or aids Conduct formal course classroom training Evaluate progress of trainees 2% 14

NON-ACES MAINTENANCE JOB (N=25) Inspect ejection seat rotary actuators Inspect seat, cockpit, canopy, or hatch thrusters Maintain documentation on items requiring periodic inspections or calibrations Remove or install ejection seat rotary actuators 5% INSPECTION JOB (N=9) Inspect canopy transparencies Inspect F-16 canopy manual flex drives Inspect F-16 canopy actuator release bolts Evaluate job hazards for compliance with AFOSH program 2% 15

SUPERVISION JOB (N=17) Write replies to inspection reports Maintain administrative files Initiate or maintain standby rosters or workcenter pyramid recall rosters Schedule personnel for TDY assignments, leaves, or passes Conduct general meetings, such as staff meetings, conferences, or workshops 3% 16

DAFSC DAFSC DAFSC 2A633 2A653 2A673 (N=164) (N=223) (N=139) ACES MAINTENANCE JOB 70 83 72 TRAINING JOB 0 3 2 NON-ACES MAINTENANCE JOB 5 5 4 INSPECTION JOB 0 2 4 SUPERVISION JOB 0 * 12 NOT GROUPED 25 7 6 *Indicates less than 1% 17

DAFSC DAFSC DAFSC 2A633 2A653 2A673 DUTIES (N=164) (N=223) (N=139) A. PERFORMING GENERAL AIRCREW EGRESS 57 49 38 MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES B. MAINTAINING ACES SYSTEMS 19 18 14 C. MAINTAINING B-1B EGRESS SYSTEMS 1 1 1 D. MAINTAINING B-2 EGRESS SYSTEMS * * * E. MAINTAINING B-52 EGRESS SYSTEMS 1 1 * F. MAINTAINING F-15 EGRESS SYSTEMS 1 1 1 G. MAINTAINING F-16 EGRESS SYSTEMS 4 4 3 H. MAINTAINING F-22 EGRESS SYSTEMS * * * I. MAINTAINING F-117 EGRESS SYSTEMS * * * J. MAINTAINING T-38 EGRESS SYSTEMS * * * *Indicates less than 1% Note: Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding 18

Career Ladder Progression Percent Time Spent on Duties (Cont.) DAFSC DAFSC DAFSC 2A633 2A653 2A673 DUTIES (N=164) (N=223) (N=139) K. PERFORMING MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 4 6 8 L. PERFORMING GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE AND TO 1 2 4 SYSTEM ACTIVITIES M. PERFORMING GENERAL SUPPLY AND EQUIPMENT 3 3 4 ACTIVITIES N. PERFORMING GENERAL AIRCRAFT OR CROSS 3 3 3 UTILIZATION TRAINING ACTIVITIES O. PERFORMING DEPLOYMENT AND CONTINGENCY ACTIVITIES 1 2 3 P. PERFORMING TRAINING ACTIVITIES 1 4 7 Q. PERFORMING MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISORY 1 5 16 ACTIVITIES Note: Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding 19

ACES MAINTENANCE JOB (33%) (N=183) NON-ACES MAINTENANCE JOB (32%) NOT GROUPED (35%) 20

PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING TASKS (N=183) Arm or dearm ejection systems 93 Remove or install ejection seats 92 Transport egress system explosive components 91 Remove or install safety pins, struts, caps, or plugs 90 Remove or install inertia reels or components 90 Identify egress systems explosive component service-life 89 or shelf-life Remove or install ejection seat catapults 89 Remove or install ejection seat lap-belts 89 Inspect ejection seat components 87 Remove or install ejection seat survival kits 87 Inspect ejection seat lap-belts 87 Remove or install ejection seat headrest, backrest, legrest, 87 or armrest pads Inspect ballistic hoses 87 21

PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING EQUIPMENT OR TOOLS (N=183) Torque Wrenches 98 Seat Slings 97 Multimeters 91 Environmental Sensor Tests Sets, TTU-415 88 Grounding Cables 88 Pin Straighteners 87 Weights, such as 15 lbs or 30 lbs 87 Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE) Cranes 86 Advanced Concept Ejection Seat (ACES II) Skids 85 Gauges, Depth 83 Seat Raise Bars 77 Inert Power Supplies 76 AGE Crew Chief Stands 70 Canopy Slings 67 Gauges, Clearances 67 22

STS is well supported by survey data 17 STS items were unsupported (two are significant) Seven technical tasks performed by 20% or more of members were not referenced to STS These should be reviewed for possible inclusion in STS Some STS items may need proficiency code review Over 1,100 uncoded STS items were performed by more than 20% of members 23

UNIT STS ELEMENT 2.5.8. Use Methods and Procedures technical orders (2.5.7. Use technical manuals as a source of information for:) Task L0327. Establish or maintain automated technical order management system (ATOMS) accounts 7.6.8. Dissassemble/assemble Pyrotechnic Module 3 (7.6. F-15 Canopy systems) Task F0239. Assemble or disassemble F-15 pyrotechnic modules PROF CODE 2b 2b PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING 1st ENL (N=162) 3- LVL (N=189) TNG EMP* 15 13 3.37 19 19 2.43 *Mean TE Rating = 2.46; Standard Deviation = 1.63; High TE = 4.09 24

Examples PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING TNG 1ST ENL 3- LVL TASK EMP* (N=183) (N=163) A0046 Inspect ejection sequence selectors 1.97 46 45 A0052 Inspect seat, cockpit, canopy or 2.43 63 64 hatch thrusters A0065 Perform operational checks on inertia reels 5.40 83 82 A0105 Remove or install ejection seat 2.54 31 31 selectors B0136 Perform operational checks on 6.34 59 56 ACES system mortar disconnect assemblies N0348 Assist in launching or recovering 1.40 28 26 aircraft N0368 Perform operational checks of aircraft seat adjustment systems 3.26 48 48 *Mean TE Rating =2.46; Standard Deviation =1.63; High TE = 4.09 25

Job Satisfaction Indicators (Across Jobs within Cluster) ACES MAINT JOB (N=399) TRAINING JOB (N=8) NON-ACES MAINT JOB (N=25) INSPECTION JOB (N=9) SUPERVISION JOB (N=17) JOB INTERESTING 69 88 76 89 88 TALENTS WELL UTILIZED 86 100 92 100 89 TRAINING WELL UTILIZED 95 100 88 100 82 SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT 77 100 80 78 82 PLAN TO REENLIST 70 50 60 67 59 26

AD (N=373) ANG (N=132) AFRC (N=21) JOB INTERESTING 87 96 91 TALENTS WELL UTILIZED 74 85 86 TRAINING WELL UTILIZED 91 96 100 SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT 86 95 90 27

Job Satisfaction Indicators (Current vs. Previous Study) 1-48 Months 49-96 Months 97+ Months 2003 (N=183) 2000 (N=95) 2003 (N=66) 2000 (N=61) 2003 (N=124) 2000 (N=143) JOB INTERESTING 60 49 71 41 69 59 TALENTS WELL UTILIZED 78 69 84 67 93 78 TRAINING WELL UTILIZED 92 80 92 92 91 92 SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT 70 61 74 59 77 62 PLAN TO REENLIST 56 45 73 57 60 59 28

PLANNING TO REENLIST (N=103) Job security Retirement benefits Medical or dental care for AD member Bonus or special pay Military-related education/training opportunities PERCENT RESPONDING 73 72 67 66 63 AVERAGE 2.61 2.78 2.65 2.54 2.54 PLANNING TO SEPARATE (N=78) Military lifestyle Pay and allowances Civilian job opportunities Location of present assignment Recognition of efforts 63 56 50 42 38 2.41 2.46 2.49 2.18 2.38 Scale: 1 = slight influence, 2 = moderate influence, 3 = strong influence 29

PLANNING TO REENLIST (N=48) Retirement benefits Bonus or special pay Medical or dental care for AD member Medical or dental care for family members Job security PERCENT RESPONDING 63 63 60 59 58 AVERAGE 2.73 2.67 2.45 2.68 2.36 PLANNING TO SEPARATE (N=17) Military lifestyle Pay and allowances Civilian job opportunities Bonus or special pay Esprit de corps/morale 54 42 41 36 36 1.89 2.14 2.71 2.67 2.50 Scale: 1 = slight influence, 2 = moderate influence, 3 = strong influence 30

PLANNING TO REENLIST (N=75) Retirement benefits Job security Pay and allowances Military lifestyle Medical or dental care for family members PERCENT RESPONDING 76 66 65 52 49 AVERAGE 2.72 2.76 2.39 2.26 2.38 PLANNING TO SEPARATE (N=8) Promotion opportunities Number/duration of TDYs or deployments Recognition of efforts Enlisted evaluation system Medical/dental care for AD member 51 51 51 38 38 2.75 2.25 2.00 2.67 2.33 Scale: 1 = slight influence, 2 = moderate influence, 3 = strong influence 31

Career ladder is homogeneous job structure with one cluster and five jobs Career ladder documents well supported by survey data STS provide comprehensive coverage of work performed by career ladder Review of some items warranted Job satisfaction indicators More satisfaction when compared to previous study across all TAFMS groups 32

Visit our web site at: E-Mail: nora.alanis@randolph.af.mil 33

Sustaining the Combat Capability of America s Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e