Independent Economic Impact of FY 2015 Ohio Food Program, Agricultural Clearance Program, & Governor s Summer Meals Programs

Similar documents
Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Wright State University

Growing Stronger Together. Ready to Tender: Preparing farmers to supply to school feeding programs

Demonstration Projects to End Childhood Hunger 2016 Annual Report to Congress

BETTER DAYS THROUGH BETTER WAYS GRANT APPLICATION

Improving Our ILLINOIS HOSPITALS AND HEALTH SYSTEMS. CoMMunities. 95.3b. state EcoNoMic impact 2018 B

CSX SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM FOR TRANSPORTING HEALTHY FOOD

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LOCAL PARKS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Business Commons

Urban Agriculture Grant Request for Proposals

RICHARD B. RUSSELL NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH ACT [As Amended Through P.L , Enacted February 07, 2014]

Estimating the Economic Contributions of the Utah Science Technology and Research Initiative (USTAR) to the Utah Economy

Housekeeping. Today s Presenters. USDA Farm to School Program 3/14/2014

The University of Georgia

SUBJECT: Farm to School and School Garden Expenses. State Directors Child Nutrition Programs All States

Innovation Village, Cal Poly Pomona Economic Benefits Analysis City of Pomona

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NATIONAL HERITAGE AREAS: A CASE STUDY APPROACH

Return on Investment of New Mexico SUN PATH Program. Doleswar Bhandari and Jeff Mitchell Bureau of Business and Economic Research, UNM

XYZ Community Health Center

The Economic Case for Incubation

CITY OF DAVIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION

SUBSIDIES IN THE AMERICAN ECONOMY

AGRICULTURAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROMOTION ACT

Regional Economic Impact Study of the UCF Business Incubation Program

Innovation. Impact. Illinois.

Other State Allocations for Current Operations (3200) and (3300)

Specialty Crop Farm Bill Alliance 2012 Farm Bill Policy Recommendations

Food Enterprise Center Business Plan Executive Summary Freeport, Illinois

FOOD PANTRY BEST PRACTICES. Scoring Guide

Update the Plate Mini Grant Program 2015

Regional Economic Impact Analysis of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act US Army Corps of Engineers

The Economic Impacts of Idaho s Nonprofit Organizations

Community. Strengthening local communities. Relieving hunger. Enhancing resilience in the face of disasters. Developing local communities

From our Board Chairman

September 19, 2016 Meeting Notes

Healthy Harvest Food Bank

Serving the Community Well:

STATE AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS SUPPORTING S. 744 AS APPROVED BY THE SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE

East Texas Food Bank Board of Directors

Green Recovery: How Weatherization Works for Iowans Sustainable Policy Assists Struggling Families, Enhances Iowa s Economy

Grant Programs Overview

USDA Value Added Producer Grant Program

Arizona Department of Agriculture

IWU Impact. Measuring the Economic and Civic Contributions of Indiana Wesleyan University to Grant County

CERTIFIED PRODUCER S CERTIFICATES (CPC)

Feasibility Analysis for Utilizing The Benefit Bank in North Carolina

Testimony of. Before the House Armed Services Committee on the Economic Consequences of Defense Sequestration. October 26, 2011

USDA Farm to School Program FY 2013 FY 2017 Summary of Grant Awards

Although the AFID may be used to make loans, the preference is to use the AFID to make grants.

2017 STATUS REPORT on

Economic Impact Study of Habitat for Humanity of McLean County, IL by Landon Hoffman and Diego Mendez Carbajo, Ph.D.

Economic Impact of the proposed The Medical University of South Carolina

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Reporting Requirements. September 25, :30 p.m.

Inside: FARMERS GUIDE TO APPLYING FOR VALUE-ADDED PRODUCER GRANT (VAPG) FUNDING. August Program Basics. Examples of Eligible Projects

Request for Applications 2018

AGRICULTURAL MARKETING AND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION MDA Grants Line:

Mbabala Island - Churches changing a Community

SUMMARY REPORT NEW MEXICO GROWN FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES FOR SCHOOL MEALS PROGRAM (NM GROWN) STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT

OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION

2014 Farm Bill Funding Opportunities and Provisions Affecting Local Agriculture Markets. 6/3/2014 The National Association of Towns and Townships

TO BE RESCINDED Home-delivered meal service.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

CERTIFIED SC GROWN COMMUNITY GRANT

Implementation Plan: Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010

Produce Safety Educators Monthly Meeting #17 March 21, PM EDT

Military Economic Impact Analysis for the State of Louisiana

AGRICULTURAL MARKETING AND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION MDA Grants Line: AGRI MINNESOTA FARM TO EARLY CARE AND EDUCATION GRANT PROGRAM

Strategic Transportation Infrastructure Program

Washington, D.C CHRONOLOGY AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FEDERAL FOOD ASSISTANCE LEGISLATION

This presentation should take between 30 and 40 minutes, depending on how much interaction there is between the audience and the presenter.

Regional Health Care as an Economic Generator Economic Impact Assessment Dothan, Alabama Health Care Industry

HOW TO HOST A FOOD DRIVE

Education Appropriations

Economic Impact. North Dakota University System. in of the. Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report 690. August 2012

HCPSS Level III Proposal (Food and Nutrition)

Harvest of the Month Fundraising Guide

Nutrient Management Update. and. Producer Led Watershed Grants

How the Food Bank Works

CACFP Annual Sponsor Training

Delta County Reinventing the Economy for the Next Generation

The ultimate objective of all of our development assistance is to improve the quality of life for Africans.

Conservation Security Program: Implementation and Current Issues

FY2025 Master Plan/ FY Strategic Plan Summary

REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF DEFENSE-RELATED SPENDING IN ILLINOIS

STATE ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY

Community Alliance for Education and Hunger Relief. AES Research Center Conference January 11, 2017

Georgia Department of Education

DENVER FOOD ACTION PLAN

Georgia Department of Education

Request for Proposal (RFP) Specialty Crop Block Grant Program Farm Bill (SCBGP-FB) Funding Opportunity Number: USDA-AMS-TM-SCBGP-G

Human Services Provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

KRS Global Biotechnology Inc. Catalyst Fund Application (TTC) to Governor s Office Of Economic Development

PUTTING MICHIGAN S GOOD FOOD FORWARD.

Oregon New Markets Tax Credit Program

FOOD & FUND DRIVE INSIDE... HOST S KIT

Georgia Department of Education

September METROPOLITAN AGRICULTURAL PRESERVES PROGRAM STATUS REPORT

Farm and Food Support Under USDA s Section 32 Program

The Economic Impacts of the New Economy Initiative in Southeast Michigan

Illinois Department of Agriculture Farmers Market Forums

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF $1.4 BILLION OF UNIVERSITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Transcription:

Independent of FY 2015 Ohio Food Program, Agricultural Clearance Program, & Governor s Summer Meals Programs Prepared for the Ohio Association of Foodbanks by Howard Fleeter February 2, 2016 I. Overview In state fiscal year 2015, funding was provided for a series of programs to enhance the availability of fresh fruits, vegetables, protein items and shelf staple items to Ohio s 12 Feeding America foodbanks. The two largest programs are the Ohio Food Program which focuses on protein and shelf staple items, and the Agricultural Clearance Program which directs agricultural surplus items from Ohio farmers and growers to the foodbanks. Each of these programs was funded at $7.25 million in FY15 for a combined total of $14.5 million. In addition, in FY15, an additional $2.146 million in state funding was provided to supplement the availability of food supplies to Ohio families over the summer. The Summer Weekend Meal program provides shelf-stable kid friendly weekend meals for children attending summer food sites that do not provide weekend service. The Summer Rural Delivery Meals Program provides eligible families in targeted rural counties where no federally funded summer meal programs are available with a home delivered box containing 11 shelf-stable, kid-friendly meals. Finally, the Mobile Farmers Market Program provides fresh fruits and vegetables and popular protein items such as peanut butter to families in the Summer Weekend and Rural Delivery programs. Not only do these programs play a vital role in providing much-needed support to Ohio families struggling with the impact of poverty and the continued slow recovery from the recession, but these programs also provide an additional benefit to the state in terms of supporting Ohio s agricultural sector. This report provides a summary of the economic impact of these programs on the state economy. II. Direct of Ohio Food Support Programs Table 1 on the following page provides an overview of expenditures, food purchased, and meals provided through each of the three Ohio food support programs in fiscal year 2015. The data in Table 1 (provided by the Ohio Association of Foodbanks) summarizes the direct economic impact of the three food support programs in Ohio. 41.6 million pounds of food is purchased at a total cost of $13.7 million. This food is sufficient to provide 35.6 million meals to needy families through Ohio s network of foodbanks (note that based on calculations made by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 1.20 lbs of food is considered to constitute 1 meal). When storage, packing, distribution, and administrative costs are included, total food support program expenditures total nearly $16.3 million in FY 2015. The direct economic impact of the food support programs includes the meals provided as well as the income received by the food producers, storage, packing and distribution providers, and administrators of the programs. 1 FY2015 Independent Analysis

Table 1: Summary of Ohio Food Support Programs, FY2015 Measure Total Cost of Food Purchased Total Pounds of Food Purchased # of Meals Provided Storage, Packing & Distribution Costs Administrative Costs Total Program Costs Ohio Food Program Agricultural Clearance Program Governor Kasich Summer Meal Programs Total State Food Support Programs $5,981,173 $5,993,522 $1,699,928 $13,674,623 11,526,348 28,881,357 1,148,542 41,556,287 9,605,290 24,182,610 1,800,945 35,588,845 $705,000 $705,000 $285,241 $1,695,241 $362,500 $362,500 $160,518 $885,518 $7,048,673 $7,061,391 $2,145,687 $16,255,382 Note: Total OFP and ACP food costs in FY15 were $12,365,000. However, $390,305 of this figure was included in FY14 reporting, leaving the amounts shown in Table 1. III. Multiplier Effects In addition to direct impact, all economic activity also produces indirect and induced effects that are the result of economic multiplier effects. Multiplier effects are the result of additional expenditures made by those who are suppliers for the food support programs, as well as from purchases made by those who derive income directly or indirectly from the food support programs in Ohio. For example, when a farmer purchases fertilizers for his crops from an Ohio crop nutrient supplier, this supplier will earn profits, make investments in his or her business, and hire employees. These types of effects are termed indirect economic impact. In addition, the supplier s employees in turn spend the money they have earned on other items in the local economy, providing additional economic impact, which is termed induced economic impact. Finally, the merchants whose goods are purchased by these employees also enjoy an increase in their income, which begins another round of economic ripple effects. The economic ripple effects created by the three Ohio food support programs can be measured by using standard economic multiplier models. Multiplier models allow researchers to compute the indirect and total economic impact resulting from a particular economic initiative or industry based upon the inputting of the initial data reflecting the direct economic benefits of the initiative or industry in question. This analysis uses the I- RIMS Multiplier Model developed by IMPLAN, a private economics research group. IMPLAN took over the computation of economic multipliers from the Bureau of Analysis (BEA) after Federal funding cuts in 2013. The I-RIMS multiplier model is based on national and regional economic data (periodically updated by BEA) for 406 individual industries. The most current I-RIMS multipliers available are based upon 2007 national data and 2013 regional data. 2 FY2015 Independent Analysis

A. Agricultural Clearance Program Table 2 provides a slightly more detailed overview of the direct economic impact of the Agricultural Clearance Program. The IMPLAN multiplier model has different multipliers for different categories of farm products. Table 2: Agricultural Clearance Program FY15 Fruit & Vegetable Purchases Commodity Pounds Purchased Cost Vegetables & Melons 25.1 million $4.5 million Fruit from Trees 3.3 million $0.8 million Berries & Beets 0.3 million $0.1 million Eggs & Protein Products 0.3 million $0.7 million Total 28.9 million $6.0 million The data in Tables 1 and 2 can be used with the I-RIMS multiplier model in order to compute the total (direct + indirect) economic of the Agricultural Clearance Program on Ohio s economy in FY 2015. Table 3 provides a summary of this impact, showing the direct and indirect economic impact on output in the state of Ohio as well as the income generated and number of jobs created. Table 3: FY 2015 of the Ohio Agricultural Clearance Program Agricultural Clearance Program Direct 3 FY2015 Independent Analysis Total Value of Output $6.0 Million $3.4 Million $9.4 Million $3.6 Million 120 Jobs Transportation, Storage & Value of Output $1.1 million $1.0 million $2.1 million $0.9 million 17 Ag Clearance Total Value of Output $7.1 million $4.5 million $11.6 million $4.4 million 137 The data in Table 3 show that $6.0 million of direct food purchases through the Agricultural Clearance Program in FY15 led to an additional $3.4 million in output produced across the state, for a total increase in output of $9.4 million. $3.6 million in additional income was generated across the state, and 120 jobs were created. In addition, $1.1 million of

expenditures on storage, packing, distribution, and administration resulted in an additional $1.0 million in output across the state, along with nearly $900,000 in additional income and 17 additional jobs. In total, in FY15 the Agricultural Clearance Program added $11.6 million in output across Ohio, generated $4.4 million in income, and led to the creation of 137 jobs. B. Ohio Food Program Table 4 shows the results of applying the I-RIMS economic multiplier models to the data in Table 1 relating to the Ohio Food Program. The multipliers for the BEA economic category Community food, housing, and other relief services were used to compute the economic impact of the Ohio Food Program as these commodities were not purchased from farmers, as is the case with the Agricultural Clearance Program. Note that the economic impact from storage, packing, distribution, and program administration activities was identical under the two programs. The data in Table 4 show that $6.0 million of direct food purchases through the Ohio Food Program in FY15 led to an additional $6.1 million in output produced across the state, for a total increase in output of $12.1 million. $4.6 million in additional income was generated across the state, and 148 jobs were created. In addition, $1.1 million of expenditures on storage, packing, distribution, and administration resulted in an additional $1.0 million in output across the state, along with nearly $900,000 in additional income and 17 additional jobs. In total, in FY15 the Ohio Food Program added $14.25 million in output across Ohio, generated $5.5 million in income, and led to the creation of 165 jobs. Table 4: FY 2015 of the Ohio Food Program Ohio Food Program Direct Total Value of Output $6.0 Million $6.1 Million $12.1 Million $4.6 Million 148 Jobs Transportation, Storage & Value of Output $1.1 million $1.0 million $2.1 million $0.9 million 17 OH Food Program Total Value of Output $7.1 million $7.15 million $14.25 million $5.5 million 165 4 FY2015 Independent Analysis

C. Additional Governor s Summer Meals Programs Table 5 shows the results of applying the I-RIMS economic multiplier models to the data in Table 1 relating to the additional Governor s Summer Meals Programs provided in FY15. These additional food programs include an array of summer food assistance programs including the Weekend Meals, Rural Delivery Meals, and Mobile Farmers Market programs. The analysis of these supplemental food assistance programs used the same multipliers as were used to estimate the impact of the Ohio Food Program. The data in Table 5 show that $1.7 million of direct food purchases through the Governor s Summer Meals Programs in FY15 led to an additional $1.75 million in output produced across the state, for a total increase in output of $3.4 million. $1.3 million in additional income was generated across the state, and 42 jobs were created. When the $445,000 in packaging, distribution and program administration expenditures are included, the FY15 Governor s Summer Meals Programs added a total of $4.3 million in output across Ohio, generated $1.7 million in income, and led to the creation of 49 jobs. Table 5: FY 2015 of Governor s Summer Meals Programs Governor Kasich Summer Meals Programs Direct Total Value of Output $1.7 Million $1.75 Million $3.4 Million $1.3 Million 42 Jobs Transportation & Program Value of Output $0.45 million $0.45 million $0.9 million $0.4 million 7 Exec. Order Total Value of Output $2.1 million $2.2 million $4.3 million $1.7 million 49 5 FY2015 Independent Analysis

FY15 Food Assistance Program Summary Table 6 below shows the cumulative economic impact when all of the State s FY15 food assistance programs are added together. Table 6: FY 2015 Total of All Ohio Food Assistance Programs All Ohio Food Assistance Programs Direct Total Value of Output $13.7 Million $11.3 Million $25.0 Million $9.5 Million 310 Jobs Transportation, Storage & Value of Output $2.6 million $2.5 million $5.1 million $2.1 million 41 Food Assistance Totals Value of Output $16.3 Million $13.8 Million $30.1 Million $11.65 Million 351 Jobs The data in Table 6 show that $13.7 million of direct food purchases through the three food support programs in FY15 led to an additional $11.3 million in output produced across the state, for a total increase in output of $25.0 million. $9.5 million in additional income was generated across the state, and 310 jobs were created. When expenditures on storage, packing, distribution, and program administration are included, the FY15 Agricultural Clearance Program, Ohio Food Program, and the Governor s Summer Meals Programs added $30.1 million in output across Ohio, generated $11.65 million in income, and led to the creation of 351 jobs, in addition to the direct benefits of providing 35.6 million meals to needy Ohioans. 6 FY2015 Independent Analysis