Eileen P. Magri, MSN, RN, NE-BC and Karen Hylton-McGuire, MS, RNC-NIC, IBCLC, RLC. Transforming

Similar documents
Best Fed BEGINNINGS. Improving Breastfeeding Support in Hospitals. Laurence Grummer-Strawn, PhD

On the Path towards Baby-Friendly Hospitals: First Steps Breastfeeding Promotion Webinar June 19, 2013 Objectives: Explain how to start planning for

Doctors in Action. A Call to Action from the Surgeon General to Support Breastfeeding

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED. Supporting Breastfeeding in Toronto SUMMARY. Date: January 15, Board of Health. To: Medical Officer of Health

The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative and the Initiation of Breastfeeding in Washington. Rachel Hays. A thesis

Using mpinc as a Tool for Improvement

Leveraging Hospital Breastfeeding Data to Improve Maternity Care Practices and Breastfeeding Rates

Best Strategies to Encourage Breastfeeding

The Business Case for Baby- Friendly: Building A Family- Centered Birthing Environment

CDC s Maternity Practices in Infant and Care (mpinc) Survey. Using mpinc Data to Support

World Breastfeeding Week (WBW) 1-7 August 2017

Healthy People 2020 Community Innovations Project Form A Cover Page

STRATEGIC COMMUNITY-BASED PARTNERSHIPS

Using Data to Drive Change: California Continues to Increase In-hospital Exclusive Breastfeeding Rates

Closing the Gap in Hospital Breastfeeding Rates. A Special Analysis for California s Central Valley

Example 1: Improvement in knowledge, skills and/or practices Clinician III Nursing Leadership Development

The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative at Boston Medical Center

Illinois Breastfeeding Blueprint: From Data to Strategy to Change

The Role of the Nurse- Physician Leadership Dyad in Implementing the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative

Updated Summary of Changes to the 2016 Guidelines and Evaluation Criteria V 2

Preparing for a Baby-Friendly site visit. Anne Merewood PhD MPH IBCLC

The Path Towards Baby-Friendly: Navigating the Game Board

BREASTFEEDING SUPPORT IN HEALTHCARE

Care through Legislation and Policy. Meeting HP 2020 Breastfeeding Targets

Minnesota s Progress Towards Baby-Friendly Hospital Designation: Results from the Infant Feeding Practices Survey

*Ontario County Public Health *Thompson Health *Finger Lakes Health *Clifton Springs Hospital & Clinics

Ruth Patterson, RNC, BSN, MHSA, Integrated Quality Services

Family-Centered Maternity Care

Minnesota s Progress Towards Baby-Friendly Hospital Designation: Results from the Infant Feeding Practices Survey

10 GCA HEALTH AND SAFETY CH. 92A NANA YAN PATGON ACT

ASTHO Breastfeeding Learning Community. Learning Session. February 8, 2018 For Audio, Please Dial: Ext #

STATUS OF MATERNAL, INFANT, AND YOUNG CHILD NUTRITION (MIYCN) IN MEDICAL COLLEGES & HOSPITALS

CT DPH - CBI CPPW Project: Web Survey Questions for Maternity Staff

Preparing for a Baby-Friendly USA Assessment. Anne Merewood PhD MPH IBCLC Associate Professor, BU School of Medicine

Agenda 2/10/2012. Project AIM. Improving Perinatal Health Outcomes: New York State Obstetric and Neonatal Quality Collaborative

WIC Local Agencies Partnering with Hospitals for Step 10 of the BFHI

Step by Step, Day by Day. That s the Baby-Friendly Way. Canada. I have no conflict of interest to declare. Objectives

Evidence-Based Hospital Breastfeeding Support (EBBS) Learning Collaborative. Webinar #3 March 19, 2013

New YorkYS Medicaid New New York Coverage of Lactation Counseling Services and Breast Pumps

Continuing Education Materials for Lactation Care Providers (RNs, Lactation Consultants, Lactation Counselors, and Dietitians)

Our journey to Academia

Did your facility complete all requirements for One Star? Yes (Continue) No (All requirements for one star must be complete to continue)

Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative Congress October 2016 World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland

Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) Breastfeeding Activities Summary (Updated 7/14/2015)

Step 3: Inform all pregnant women about the benefits and management of breastfeeding. Jane Johnson RN IBCLC Kim Pearson RN-CNML

WIC supports exclusive breastfeeding

Lactation Supportive Environments

From the Desk of the Medical Director Using Phone Triage to Meet Timely Access Regulations

Evaluating the impact of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative on breast-feeding rates: a multi-state analysis

Technology s Role in Support of Optimal Perinatal Staffing. Objectives 4/16/2013

Tracking Near Misses to Keep Newborns Safe From Falls

Patient Rights and Responsibilities

Your Birth Experience: First Trimester. Women s Hospital

Discuss the impact of improved maternity care practices Define the goal of the Texas Ten Step Star Achiever Breastfeeding Learning Collaborative

Shawna Helmuth BS, RN, IBCLC, RLC Lactation Services Salinas Valley Memorial Healthcare System Salinas CA

UNICEF Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative Hong Kong Association. Baby-Friendly Hospital Designation. Hong Kong

Location, Location, Location! Labor and Delivery

Best Fed Beginnings:

APPENDIX D INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF CERTIFICATE OF NEED APPLICATION FOR DESIGNATION AS A PERINATAL FACILITY SECTION I. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

The Interstate Collaborative: 2012: Supporting Widespread Implementation of the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding

Making Strides Toward Improving Breastfeeding One AAP Project at a Time!

Brandon Regional Health Authority Breastfeeding Framework. February 2005 Updated January 2006

Friday: April 4, 2014 Rutgers University Inn and Conference Center 178 Ryders Lane, New Brunswick, NJ

2/1/2016. LACTATION CARE MAP at CHOC Children s Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Disclosures. Crystal Deming has nothing to disclose.

T EXAS DEPART MENT O F S TAT E HEALT H

Welcome Maternity Center Tour

Breastfeeding in Virginia: a legislative update. This institution is an equal opportunity provider.

BrEaSTfEEdiNg. EducatioN. EmpoweriNg Future HEalth Care ProvidErS. Louise C. Miller, PhD, RN. Jane T. Cook, MSN, RN, IBCLC

Presenter Disclosures Lori Feldman-Winter, MD, MPH

I m Hungry! Neonatal Cues Indicating Readiness to be fed

The Mommies Program An Integrated Model of Care. Karen Palombo, LCSW, LCDC Texas Women s SUD Intervention Specialist

Breastfeeding Support POLLY SISK, PHD, RD, IBCLC 2/12/13

Managing NAS Scores with Non-Pharmacological Measures

Breastfeeding Initiatives in Estonia. Anneli Sammel, MA National Institute for Health Development

COLLABORATION IS KEY

Acknowledgements. Dr. Mase for his endless hours of effort and support through the process of completing this work.

Mother s Own Milk (MOM) Initiative

good Tell us something LACTATION SUCCESS! MAY 31, 2016 Submitted by: Kellie Gearlds, International Board Certified Lactation Consultant

Welcome Baby Postpartum: 2 Month Call. Visit Information

Breastfeeding Promotion. Kirsten M. Verkamp. Graduate School of Nursing

Responses to Current Questions Pertaining to the BFHI

Data Collection and Reporting for MOM Initiative. Karen Fugate MSN RNC-NIC, CPHQ

Assessment of Midwives Knowledge Regarding Childbirth Classes in Baghdad City

SAMPLE STRATEGIES AND EVIDENCE-BASED OR -INFORMED STRATEGY MEASURES

2110 Pediatric Newborn Care

Organization Review Process Guide Perinatal Care Certification

KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICES OF RESIDENT DOCTORS AND NURSES IN BREAST FEEDING IN OBSTETRIC AND PAEDIATRICS DEPARTMENTS OF JINNAH HOSPITAL, LAHORE

Working Through the 4-D Pathway. Dissemination and Designation Phases

From Baby Bump to Baby Buggy A Maternal-Child Training Workshop

Your facility is having a baby boom. The number of cesarean births is

Revitalization of Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative in Bangladesh. Prof. Soofia Khatoon Bangladesh Breast feeding Foundation

Breastmilk is safe, available, affordable and

In-hospital Factors Associated with Supplementation among Healthy, Full-term, Breastfed Infants

Faculty Disclosure. SOAP, LATCH or IDK? Law and Ethics of Lactation Documentation. What governs IBCLC charting and documentation?

Physician Education and Training on Breastfeeding Action Plan

Bright Futures: An Essential Resource for Advancing the Title V National Performance Measures

Organization: Adventist Healthcare Shady Grove Medical Center

Idaho Perinatal Project Newsletter

EMPower Training. Hospital Webinar. March 1, 2018

Continuum of Care Maine CDC. How We Arrived Here. Maine Home Birth Collaborative. MMC PowerPoint Template 4/12/2018

Transcription:

Eileen P. Magri, MSN, RN, NE-BC and Karen Hylton-McGuire, MS, RNC-NIC, IBCLC, RLC Transforming a Care Delivery Model to Increase Breastfeeding Jinx Photography People/Alamy Abstract This article describes the process of changing the care delivery model for maternity practice in a New York State Regional Perinatal Center to support exclusive breastfeeding, defined as providing nothing other than human milk feedings. Barriers exist in hospitals that inhibit exclusive breastfeeding of newborns at the time of discharge and fail to meet the recommendations outlined by the World Health Organization and New York State Department of Health. All aspects of mother/baby care were evaluated to meet the recommendations and increase exclusive breastfeeding. Transforming the care delivery model for mothers and babies began in 2010 with an invitation to participate in the New York State Breastfeeding Quality Improvement in Hospitals Learning Collaborative. Twelve hospitals were selected to participate with the following objectives: increase exclusive breastfeeding; improve hospital breastfeeding policies, practices, and systems that are consistent with New York State hospital regulations, laws and recommended best practices; increase staff skills and knowledge of breastfeeding and lactation support through education; empower, educate, and support new mothers to successfully breastfeed and change the culture and social norm relative to breastfeeding. The transformation of the care delivery model resulted in an increase in exclusive breastfeeding from 6 to 44. Key words: Exclusive breastfeeding; Infant care; Perinatal care; Quality improvement. May/June 2013 MCN 177

Evidence supports the short-term and longterm benefits of exclusive breastfeeding for mother and child (American Academy of Pediatrics [AAP], 2012; Bartick & Reinhold, 2010; Stuebe & Schwarz, 2010). Skin-to-skin contact and successful latch to the breast by the newborn during the first hours after birth influence a mother s ability to breastfeed successfully (Brown, Raynor, & Lee, 2011; Declercq, Labbok, Sakala, & O Hara, 2009). In 2007, 2009 and 2011, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) conducted the CDC National Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care (mpinc) survey to characterize United States maternity practices related to breastfeeding (DiGirolamo et al., 2008; Perrine et al., 2011). Hospitals were evaluated for practices known to enhance exclusive breastfeeding within the hospital setting and after discharge (Murray et al., 2007). Each state was evaluated on their compliance with the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for breastfeeding initiation and support in the hospital (WHO, 1998, 2009) and received a report card from the CDC. Results of the CDC survey determined that barriers exist in hospitals that inhibit exclusive breastfeeding of newborns at the time of discharge and fail to meet the recommendations of The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding outlined by WHO and the United Nations Children s Fund (UNICEF) in 1998 and updated in 2009 (DiGirolamo, Manninen, et al., 2008). We wanted to change the maternity care delivery model at Winthrop University Hospital to support exclusive breastfeeding. We used the Model for Improvement framework and Plan-Do-Study-Act (P-D-S-A) cycle methodology to remove existing barriers and to implement The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding (Langley et al., 2009; WHO, 1998). This method includes applying process changes, evaluating effectiveness of change through feedback, and monitoring progress to sustain improvement. The catalyst to transform the care delivery model for mothers and newborns began in June 2010 with an invitation to participate in the New York State (NYS) Breastfeeding Quality Improvement in Hospitals (BQIH) Learning Collaborative. The BQIH Learning Collaborative sought to implement the CDC mpinc survey recommendations for NYS which included (1) examine NYS regulations for maternity facilities, evaluate their evidence base and revise if necessary (New York State Department of Health Rules and Regulations, 2005); (2) sponsor a NYS wide summit of key decision-making staff at maternity facilities to highlight the importance of evidence-based practices for breastfeeding; (3) pay for hospital staff across NYS to participate in 18-hour courses in breastfeeding; (4) establish links among maternity facilities and community breastfeeding support networks in NYS; and (5) integrate maternity care into quality improvement efforts. The BQIH Learning Collaborative was sponsored through a partnership between the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) Obesity Prevention Program and the National Initiative for Children s Healthcare Quality (NICHQ). Twelve hospitals with varying characteristics and exclusive breastfeeding rates participated in the project. Objectives of the project were (1) increase exclusive breastfeeding; (2) improve hospital breastfeeding policies, practices, and systems; (3) increase staff skills and knowledge of breastfeeding support through education; (4) empower, educate, and support new mothers to successfully breastfeed; and (5) change the culture and social norm relative to breastfeeding. Setting This quality project took place in a NYSDOH Designated Regional Perinatal Center with 4,500 annual births. Within the facility, there is a L&D unit, which consists of obstetrical (OB) triage, labor, delivery, and recovery (LDR) rooms, surgical suites and OB postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and high-risk antepartum, postpartum, newborn nursery, and level III NICUs. This project focused on mother/baby care in L&D, postpartum, and the newborn nursery. The nursing staff involved in this project included 59 labor and delivery registered nurses (RNs) and 67 postpartum/nursery RNs. The project was supported by senior hospital leaders and the physician Chairpersons of the departments of Pediatrics and Obstetrics & Gynecology. Plan An evaluation of hospital systems and staff knowledge related to breastfeeding revealed failure to meet criteria as defined in The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding supported by AAP (2012) and WHO (1998, 2009). A comprehensive, multidisciplinary team was formed to evaluate current processes and potential barriers that inhibit exclusive breastfeeding. Team members were selected based on knowledge of hospital systems and commitment to change. The first area evaluated was newborn care practices in L&D. Routine practice separated mothers and babies at approximately 1 hour of life. Newborns were transferred to the nursery by the staff where routine transition care was performed while mother recovered in L&D. This process kept mothers and babies separated for more than 6 hours on average. The next area of focus was the postpartum unit. Newborn orders were preprinted with feeding orders for both breast milk and formula. For convenience, physicians checked both boxes for breastfeeding newborns. The practice encouraged supplementation of breastfeeding newborns. Modified mother/baby care was practiced, encouraging rooming-in during the day and returning babies to the nursery at night. Mother and baby were cared for by two different staff members. Nighttime feedings occurred in the newborn nursery. Breastfeeding babies were brought out of the nursery to be fed by the mother only upon request, otherwise the newborn was supplemented with formula. This practice was encouraged by both the physician and nursing staff. Tests of Change The team prioritized changes that could be accomplished quickly and sustained. The selected changes were (1) 178 volume 38 number 3 May/June 2013

establish skin-to-skin mother/baby contact in L&D after all births including formula fed babies; (2) increase time babies spent in mothers rooms on postpartum unit; (3) revise newborn order sets; (4) revise newborn flow sheet; (5) reassign nursery RNs to L&D to assess transition and admit newborns; (6) keep mother and baby together; and (7) eliminate fragmentation of care by implementing mother/baby care on the postpartum unit. The initial test of change focused on newborn care in L&D. Staff education regarding skin-to-skin mother/ baby contact had begun a few months prior to joining the BQIH Learning Collaborative. According to Walters, Boggs, Ludington-Hoe, Price, and Morrison (2007), placing newborns skin-to-skin immediately after birth has been shown to provide physiologic benefits to both mother and baby. The goal was to place all babies skinto-skin in the LDR, successfully latching and breastfeeding within 1 hour for vaginal births and 2 hours for cesarean births. One nurse was selected to objectively observe workflow during a birth to identify barriers that would prevent staff from placing babies skin-to-skin. Obtaining the birthweight was quickly identified as a barrier. The admitting department required the birthweight to admit the newborn to the hospital system and to generate the medical record number needed for all care to be rendered. After meeting with representatives from the admitting and information technology departments, the process was redesigned to forgo the birthweight until a later time. Admitting the newborn to the hospital system was accomplished using the mother s name, pediatrician name, sex of the baby, and date and time of birth. When this barrier was removed, the skin-to-skin test of change was reinitiated. Staff acclimated to the change quickly and adopted the practice for cesarean births. Mothers were educated during the admission process and responded favorably. This process change was deemed a success by the team within 1 month of implementation. The next test of change focused on the postpartum unit. The team revised newborn admission orders to reflect two separate order sets. One set was for formulafed babies and the other set was for breastfed babies. The option for formula supplementation was removed from the breastfeeding newborn admission orders. Upon admission the mother states her feeding preference as either breast or formula that would generate a specific order set to support her preference. The staff is now required to inform the mother before supplementing a breastfeeding newborn with formula. In addition, a physician order for supplementation must be obtained before providing formula. When breastfeeding mothers request formula supplementation, nurses provide education to inform the mother of the potential effects of nonmedically necessary supplementation on breastfeeding. Placing bottles of formula in the bassinet when the newborn was brought to the mother s room was discontinued. Instead, formula was placed in the Pyxis Inventory Supply Station and could be accessed by patient name if needed. Giving gift packs provided by the formula companies to mothers upon discharge was eliminated. The gift packs contained Table 1. Data Collection Percentage of infants in the population of focus Percentage of infants fed only breast milk Percentage of infants fed only formula Percentage of infants fed both breast milk AND formula Percentage of infants fed NO breast milk and NO formula Percentage of infants fed breast milk within 1 hour of vaginal birth Percentage of infants fed breast milk within 2 hours of cesarean birth Percentage of breastfeeding mothers who receive breastfeeding instruction at least once (documented in the medical record) Percentage of breastfeeding mothers directly observed and documented breastfeeding assessment every shift Percentage of breastfeeding infants receiving eight or more feedings in 24 hours Percentage of breastfeeding infants rooming-in >18 hours in 24 hours Percentage of breastfeeding mothers given any formula samples or coupons Percentage of breastfeeding mothers given educational and/ or promotional materials printed by a formula company Percentage of breastfeeding mothers given documented referral and contact information for postdischarge lactation support Percentage of staff assigned to direct mother/baby care receiving education on breastfeeding and lactation support formula samples and coupons for formula products that subliminally undermined a mother s decision to breastfeed her newborn (Kaplan & Graff, 2008; United States Accountability Office, 2006). All other marketing materials provided by formula companies were also removed from the unit and replaced with hospital-specific items. Newborns rooming-in with their mothers have been shown to be effective in promoting successful breastfeeding (AAP, 2012). The nightly routine practice was to return all newborns to the nursery at 10 o clock. The test of change to increase rooming-in generated much opposition. Staff opinion regarding rooming-in was negative. Most of the staff felt the facility layout and lack of private maternity rooms would deter the mother s decision to have her baby room-in. The current practice did not permit the mother to have the option to keep her baby in the room all night. The team opted to approach this test of change passively. The nightly routine returning all babies to the nursery at 10 o clock was eliminated. Instead, May/June 2013 MCN 179

Figure 1. Results A. B. C. D. Percentage of infants fed only breast milk 180 volume 38 number 3 May/June 2013 Percentage of infants fed breast milk within 1 hour of vaginal delivery goal = 62.00 1 1 goal = 1 1 Percentage of infants fed breast milk within 2 hours of C-section delivery Percentage of breastfeeding infants rooming-in >18 in 24 hours goal = 1 1 goal = 1 1

babies were brought to the nursery at night when requested by the mother. This passive approach proved successful and the concerns of the staff did not materialize. Mothers and newborns were still being separated after the initial skin-to-skin time in L&D. The next test of change required careful consideration and innovation. The newborn nursery staff assigned to transition care of the healthy newborn would be relocated to L&D instead of bringing the babies to the nursery. A core group of nursery staff RNs who were interested in transition care in L&D were identified. The nursery staff spent time in the LDR observing births to determine how to incorporate the transition process in L&D. After several P-D-S-A cycles, the nursing staff determined newborn transition care could be performed in the LDR for healthy babies and in the OB PACU for cesarean and high-risk births. Any newborn requiring a higher level of care in the NICU was excluded. This test of change was the most challenging. The process took 6 months to evaluate, to educate the nursing staff and to complete the conversion. The role of the nursery nurse included newborn assessment, administration of mandated medications, and supporting successful latch and breastfeeding in the LDR or OB PACU. Babies were transferred in their mother s arms and admitted to the postpartum unit together eliminating another separation point. The final test of change culminated the project by changing the care delivery model on the postpartum unit to mother/baby care. This change occurred simultaneously with the implementation of the transition nurse in the LDR and OB PACU. The postpartum and newborn nursery staff nurses were educated on mother/baby care. Each nurse would be responsible for the care of the mother and baby couplet. The newborn nursery continued to be staffed by an RN and ancillary staff for continuity with the physicians; however, the transition care nursery was unnecessary because the care was provided in the LDR or OB PACU. No additional staff was required to implement these changes. While the tests of change cycles were in progress, all nurses on the postpartum unit were given complimentary access to an online 18-hour breastfeeding course from the BQIH Learning Collaborative. As each change became standard practice, the breastfeeding policies and procedures were revised. Data Collection Fifteen data collection points were preestablished for each of the 12 hospitals participating in the BQIH Learning Collaborative (Table 1). ly audits were conducted (n = 50) at each hospital and submitted to an extranet Web site supported through the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Based on birth volume at our hospital (n = 4,500), the sample of healthy newborns was selected using every fifth chart methodology, rotating the starting point each month. Results As a participating member of the BQIH Learning Collaborative, goals were set by the NYSDOH and NICHQ teams for each of the 12 hospitals. Each hospital s Suggested Clinical Implications Process change requires a systematic approach Active leadership involvement is essential to implementing complex organizational change Direct care provider input and feedback are necessary for success Collaborative sharing maintains momentum to foster change On-line education can be helpful in insuring all members of the team have the same knowledge base Quality improvement drives process change Implementing research interventions such as, The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding, positively influences exclusive breastfeeding rates results were shared with all members of the BQIH Learning Collaborative and reported during scheduled learning sessions throughout the project time frame. Individual hospitals also set internal goals. Each successful test of change made a directional positive impact. Baseline data were collected in June 2010 before goal setting. Process improvement activities began in August 2010. Placing newborns skin-to-skin within 1 hour for vaginal births and 2 hours for cesarean births reached a 90 threshold and has been sustained. Rooming-in increased from 0 to over 70 and exclusive breastfeeding has increased from 6 to 44 by month 24 (May 2012) (Figure 1). The maternity nursing staff (100) completed The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding On-line Course within 12 months. Since then, the online course has been included as basic orientation for new nurses. Conclusion For the last 30 years, the importance of breastfeeding has been addressed in multiple forums. Evidence to support exclusive breastfeeding continues to mount (Stuebe & Schwarz, 2010). C. Everett Koop, a former Surgeon General, convened the first breastfeeding workshop in 1987 to address breastfeeding deficiencies across the country (United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2011a, 2011b). The WHO published The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding (1998). The AAP (2012) endorsed exclusive breastfeeding. Healthy People 2000, 2010, and 2020 have set goals for exclusive breastfeeding (Heck & Klein, 1997; United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2011a, 2011b). The Perinatal Care Core Measure Set for breastfeeding was established by The Joint Commission (TJC) in 2009 (TJC, 2009). Surgeon General, Regina M. Benjamin called for action to support breastfeeding in 2011 (United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2011a, 2011b). With all of these endorsements and evidence, the supplementation of breastfeeding newborns in New York May/June 2013 MCN 181

State is approximately 75 at hospital discharge (CDC, 2009). Participation in the BQIH Learning Collaborative exposed deficiencies in the care delivery model related to supporting exclusive breastfeeding in our hospital. Maternity practices in hospitals influence breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exclusivity (Brown et al., 2011; Declercq et al., 2009; Shealy et al., 2005) The key elements: leadership support, education of staff, feedback from staff throughout each P-D-S-A cycle, implementation of recommended system changes based on staff involvement and feedback, and reporting of the BQIH Learning Collaborative indicators through the hospital s Quality Program identified in this project can be replicated to help other institutions throughout NYS to support exclusive breastfeeding. Eileen P. Magri is the Director of Nursing, Maternal Child Health, Department of Nursing, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY. She can be reached via e-mail at emagri@winthrop.org. Karen Hylton-McGuire is an NICU Lactation Educator, Department of Nursing, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY. The authors declare no conflict of interest. DOI:10.1097/NMC.0b013e3182836af7 References American Academy of Pediatrics. (2012). Breastfeeding and the use of human milk (Policy Statement: Section on Breastfeeding). Pediatrics, 12(3), e827-e841. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-3552 Bartick, M., & Reinhold, A. (2010). The burden of suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: A pediatric cost analysis. Pediatrics, 125(5), e1048-e1056. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-1616 Brown, A., Raynor, P., & Lee, M. (2011). Healthcare professionals and mothers perceptions of factors that influence decisions to breastfeed or formula feed infants: A comparative Study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(9), 1993-2002. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05647.x Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). CDC National survey of maternity practices in infant nutrition and care. Atlanta, GA: Author. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/mpinc/index.htm Declercq, E., Labbok, M. H., Sakala, C., & O Hara, M. (2009). Hospital practices and women s likelihood of fulfilling their intention to exclusively breastfeed. American Journal of Public Health, 99(5), 929-935. doi:10.2105/ajph.2008.135236 DiGirolamo, A. M., Gummer-Strawn, L. M., & Fein, S. B. (2008). Effect of maternity-care practices on breastfeeding. Pediatrics, 122 (Suppl 2), S43-S49. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-1315e DiGirolamo, A. M., Manninen, D. L., Cohen, J. H., Shealy, K. R., Murphy, P. E., MacGowan, C. E.,... Dee, D. L. (2008). Breastfeeding-related maternity practices at hospitals and birth centers United States. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report, 57(23), 621-625. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5723a1.htm Heck, K. E., & Klein, R. J. (1997). Operational definitions for year 2000 objectives: Priority area 14, Maternal and infant health. People 2000 Statistical Notes, 1-15. Jones, J. R., Kogan, M. D., Singh, D. L., Dee, D. L., & Grummer-Strawn, L. M. (2011). Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding in the United States. Pediatrics, 128(6), 1117-1125. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0841 Kaplan, D. L., & Graff, K. M. (2008). Marketing breastfeeding: Reversing corporate influence on infant feeding practices. Journal of Urban Health, 85(4), 486-504. doi:10.1007/s11524-008-9279-6 Langley, G. J., Moen, R. D., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. (2009). Changes that result in improvement. In The improvement guide. The practical approach to enhancing organizational performance (2nd ed., pp. 15-25). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Murray, E. K., Ricketts, S., & Dellaport, J. (2007). Hospital practices that increase breastfeeding duration: Results from a population-based study. Birth, 34(3) 202-211. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536x.2007.00172.x New York State Department of Health Rules and Regulations. (2005). Title 10 Section 405.1 Perinatal Services. Perrine, C. G., Shealy, K. R., Scanlon, K. S., Grummer-Strawn, L. M., Galuska, D. A., Dee, D. L.,... Cohen, J. H. (2011). Vital signs: Hospital practices to support breastfeeding United States, 2007 and 2009. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 60(30), 1020-1025. Retrieved from www.cdc. gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6030a4.htm?s_cid=mm6030a4_w Shealy, K. R., Li, R., Benton-Davis, S., & Gummer-Strawn, L. M. (2005). The CDC guide to breastfeeding interventions. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Stuebe, A. M., & Schwarz, E. B. (2010). The risks and benefits of infant feeding practices for women and their children. Journal of Perinatology, 30, 155-162. doi:10.1038/jp.2009.107 The Joint Commission. (2009). Perinatal care core measure set. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Author. Retrieved from www.jointcommission. org/perinatal_care/ United States Accountability Office. (2006). Breastfeeding: Some strategies used to market infant formula may discourage breastfeeding; state contracts should better protect against misuse of WIC name. (GAO- 06-282). Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office. United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2011a). HealthyPeople.gov. Retrieved from http://healthypeople.gov/2020 United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2011b). The surgeon general s call to action to support breastfeeding. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General. Walters, M. W., Boggs, K. M., Ludington-Hoe, S., Price, K. M., & Morrison, B. (2007). Kangaroo care at birth for full term infants: A pilot study. MCN The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 32(6), 375-381. doi:10.1097/01.nmc.0000298134.39785.6c World Health Organization/UNICEF (1998). Evidence for the ten steps to successful breastfeeding. Geneva: World Health Organization. World Health Organization/UNICEF (2009). Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative: Revised, Updated, Expanded for Integrated Care. World Health Organization/UNICEF. Retrieved from www.unicef.org/ newslinw/tenstps.htm ONLINE The American Academy of Pediatrics www.aap.org Baby-Friendly USA www.babyfriendlyusa.org Centers for Disease Control and Prevention www.cdc.gov New York State Department of Health www.healthy.ny.gov United States Department of Health and Human Services healthypeople.gov/2020 The Joint Commission www.jointcommission.org The Surgeon General s call-to-action www.surgeongeneral.gov UNICEF www.unicef.org/newslinw/tenstps.htm World Health Organization www.who.int For more than 140 additional continuing nursing education articles on maternal child topics, go to nursingcenter.com/ce 182 volume 38 number 3 May/June 2013