MOLST for Minor Patients Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) May 2013

Similar documents
Deciding About. Health Care A GUIDE FOR PATIENTS AND FAMILIES. New York State Department of Health

Family Health Care Decisions Act (FHCDA)


INFORMATION ABOUT HEALTH CARE DECISONS. Health Care Proxy MOLST DNR

Ethical Issues: advance directives, nutrition and life support

PHYSICIAN S GUIDELINES FOR WRITING DO NOT RESUSCITATE ORDERS

C. Surrogate Decision-Maker an adult recognized to make decisions for the patient when there is no Legal Representative.

HealthStream Regulatory Script

DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE (Rhode Island Version) You must be at least eighteen (18) years of age.

and Affiliates Policy & Procedure Date of Origin: 10/95 Last Reviewed: 12/03 Last Revised: 12/03

LOUISIANA ADVANCE DIRECTIVES

SUGGESTIONS FOR PREPARING WILL TO LIVE DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY

Your Guide to Advance Directives

CHAPTER TEXT: 1 of 30 3/23/2010 3:04 PM LAWS OF NEW YORK, 2010 CHAPTER 8

Maryland MOLST. Guide for Patients. Maryland MOLST Training Task Force

Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST)

Maryland MOLST for the Health Care Practitioner. Maryland MOLST Training Task Force July 2013

Georgia Advance Directive for Healthcare

MY CHOICES. Information on: Advance Care Directive Living Will POLST Orders

Advance Directives. Planning Ahead For Your Healthcare

Advance Directives The Patient s Right To Decide CH Oct. 2013

GEORGIA ADVANCE DIRECTIVE FOR HEALTH CARE

ASSEMBLY HEALTH AND SENIOR SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO. ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY DATED: JUNE 13, 2011

YOUR RIGHT TO DECIDE YOUR RIGHT TO DECIDE YOUR RIGHT TO DECIDE

TheValues History: A Worksheet for Advance Directives Courtesy of Somerset Hospital s Ethics Committee

Supersedes/Updates: 99-10

Advance Directive. What Are Advance Medical Directives? Deciding What You Want. Recording Your Wishes

Chart Documentation Form

ILLINOIS Advance Directive Planning for Important Health Care Decisions

Advance Directive Form

MAKING YOUR WISHES KNOWN: Advance Care Planning Guide

DURABLE HEALTH CARE POWER OF ATTORNEY AND HEALTH CARE TREATMENT INSTRUCTIONS (LIVING WILL) PART I INTRODUCTORY REMARKS ON HEALTH CARE DECISION MAKING

DIRECTIVE TO PHYSICIANS AND FAMILY OR SURROGATES Advance Directives Act (see , Health and Safety Code) DIRECTIVE

A Personal Decision. Illinois State Medical Society. Practical Information About Determining Your Future Medical Care.

YOUR RIGHT TO MAKE YOUR OWN HEALTH CARE DECISIONS

SAMPLE End-of-Life Decision-Making Policy

ALLINA HOME & COMMUNITY SERVICES ALLINA HEALTH. Advance Care Planning. Discussion guide. Discussion Guide. Advance care planning

Georgia Advance Directive for Health Care

PATIENT RIGHTS, PRIVACY, AND PROTECTION

Ambulatory Surgery Center Patient Consent to Resuscitative Measures

ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE HEALTH CARE POWER OF ATTORNEY AND LIVING WILL

WYOMING Advance Directive Planning for Important Healthcare Decisions

What Are Advance Medical Directives?

GEORGIA S ADVANCE DIRECTIVE FOR HEALTH CARE

ALASKA ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE for Client

My Voice - My Choice

Planning in Advance for Your Health Care

ADVANCE DIRECTIVE INFORMATION

DELAWARE Advance Directive Planning for Important Healthcare Decisions

PENNSYLVANIA Advance Directive Planning for Important Health Care Decisions

Advance Care Planning

Goals & Objectives 4/17/2014 UNDERSTANDING ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVES (AHCD) By Maureen Kroning, EdD, RN. Why would someone need to do this?

Health Care Directive. Choose whether you want life-sustaining treatments in certain situations.

Health Care Directive. Choose whether you want life-sustaining treatments in certain situations.

POLST Discussions Doing it Better. Clinical Update in Geriatric Medicine. Judith S. Black, MD, MHA. POLST Overview. Faculty Disclosure PART I

For more information and additional resources go to Name:

Patient Decision Making

Patient Self-Determination Act

OREGON Advance Directive Planning for Important Healthcare Decisions

HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE

USING THE POST * FORM Guidance for Healthcare Professionals

Directive To Physicians and Family Or Surrogates (Living Will)

ADVANCE CARE PLANNING DOCUMENTS

What would you like to accomplish in the process of advance care planning and/or in completing a health care directive?

Using the MOST Form Guidance for Health Care Professionals

2

LONG TERM SERVICES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GUIDELINES

Advance [Health Care] Directive

SUGGESTIONS FOR PREPARING WILL TO LIVE DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY

LOUISIANA ADVANCE DIRECTIVES

Developed by the Oregon POLST Task Force. POLST is usually not for persons with stable long-term disabilities

NOTE: The first appearance of terms in bold in the body of this document (except titles) are defined terms please refer to the Definitions section.

RESOURCES FREQUENTLY ASKED CLINICAL QUESTIONS FOR PROVIDERS

ADVANCE DIRECTIVE FOR HEALTH CARE

vv POLST for Hospice Providers

GEORGIA Advance Directive Planning for Important Health Care Decisions

Advance Medical Directives

Nursing Home Model Policy for West Virginia Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST)

PENNSYLVANIA Advance Directive Planning for Important Healthcare Decisions

COLORADO Advance Directive Planning for Important Healthcare Decisions

REVISED 2005 EDITION. A Personal Decision

Advance Health Care Directive Form Instructions

Chapter 3.1.2: Relevant study material block 3.1 Ethics of Dealing with Life-threatening and Incurable Diseases

NEBRASKA Advance Directive Planning for Important Healthcare Decisions

L e g a l I s s u e s i n H e a l t h C a r e

peace of mind. Advance care planning document and instructions are enclosed for:

SOUTH CAROLINA HEALTH CARE POWER OF ATTORNEY

ADVANCE DIRECTIVE PACKET Question and Answer Section

Minnesota Health Care Directive Planning Toolkit

INDIANA Advance Directive Planning for Important Health Care Decisions

PATIENT INFORMATION ON NEVADA STATE LAW CONCERNING ADVANCE DIRECTIVES TODAY S HEALTHCARE CHOICES

Advance Directive for Health Care

State of Ohio Health Care Power of Attorney of

ABOUT THE ADVANCE DIRECTIVE FOR RECEIVING ORAL FOOD AND FLUIDS IN DEMENTIA. Introduction

NEW YORK Advance Directive Planning for Important Healthcare Decisions

Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care and Health Care Directive

Adult: Any person eighteen years of age or older, or emancipated minor.

Facing Serious Illness: Make Your Wishes Known to your Health Care Professional

483.10(b)(4) and (8) Rights Regarding Advance Directives, Treatment, and Experimental Research

E. Surrogate Decision-Maker an adult recognized to make decisions for the patient when there is no Legal Representative.

Transcription:

MOLST for Minor Patients Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) May 2013 What is MOLST (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment)? Honoring patient preferences is a critical element in providing quality end-of-life care. Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) is a program designed to improve the quality of care patients receive at the end of life by translating patient goals for care and preferences into medical orders. MOLST is based on communication between the patient, his or her health care agent or other designated surrogate decision-maker, and health care professionals that ensures shared, informed medical decision-making. What is the DOH-5003 MOLST form? To help physicians and other health care providers discuss and convey a patient's wishes regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and other life-sustaining treatment, the Department of Health has approved a physician order form DOH-5003 MOLST, which can be used statewide by health care practitioners and facilities. The MOLST form is a bright pink medical order form signed by a New York State licensed physician or a border state physician that tells others the patient s medical orders for lifesustaining treatment. All health care professionals must follow these medical orders as the patient moves from one location to another, unless a physician examines the patient, reviews the orders, and changes them. The MOLST serves as a single document that contains a patient s goals and preferences regarding: Resuscitation instructions when the patient has no pulse and/or is not breathing Instructions for intubation and mechanical ventilation when the patient has a pulse and the patient is breathing Treatment guidelines Future hospitalization and transfer Artificially administered fluids and nutrition Antibiotics Other instructions about treatments not listed Under State law, the MOLST form is the only authorized form in New York State for documenting both nonhospital Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and Do Not Intubate (DNI) orders. In addition, the form is beneficial to patients and providers as it provides specific medical orders and is recognized and used in a variety of health care settings. Has the DOH-5003 MOLST form been approved for use for minor patients? The Department of Health approved the physician order form DOH-5003 MOLST for use with minor patients. MOLST can be used statewide by health care practitioners and facilities.

NYSDOH created a Legal Requirements Checklist for Minor Patients with instructions to assist health care professionals in completing the MOLST form with minor patients and their parents or other legal guardians with authority to make health care decisions on his or her behalf. The checklist for minor patients can be found at: http://www.health.ny.gov/professionals/patients/patient_rights/molst/docs/checklist_minor.pdf. Who is a minor patient? Minor patient means any person younger than 18 years old who is not married. Who is an emancipated minor? An emancipated minor patient is a minor patient, over the age of 16, who is living independently or has a child of their own. Over the age of 16 means the minor patient is at least 16 and younger than 18 years of age. What type of minor patient should have a MOLST form? MOLST is generally for patients with serious health conditions. Physicians should consider a MOLST discussion if the child: Has medical decision-making capacity and wants to avoid or receive life-sustaining treatment. Lacks medical decision-making capacity and the child s parent or guardian has already chosen to withhold certain life-sustaining treatment because of their known poor prognosis. Might die within the next year. Is highly likely to experience clinical decompensation and discussion regarding consideration of life-sustaining treatment is appropriate. These patients may: Want all appropriate treatment, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Want to avoid all life-sustaining treatment. Choose to limit life-sustaining treatment. Want to avoid any attempt to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and prefer to Allow Natural Death (DNR order) Want to avoid placement of a tube down the throat into the windpipe connected to a breathing machine (intubation) and request a Do Not Intubate Order (DNI order). What are some clinical examples of children who may be appropriate for a MOLST discussion? The clinical examples are based on the Association for Children with Life-threatening or Terminal Conditions & their Families (ACT) criteria and illustrate when thoughtful MOLST discussions should and should not be considered: 1. Life-threatening conditions for which curative treatment may be feasible but can fail. A goals for care discussion may be particularly important during phases of prognostic uncertainty and when treatment fails. If a child experienced severe head injury as a result of acute trauma in a motor vehicle accident, a thoughtful MOLST discussion is appropriate. Generally speaking, a child who has relapsed Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia within a year of diagnosis has a poor prognosis, yet cure is possible; thoughtful goals for care

and MOLST discussions are appropriate. In contrast, a child with newly diagnosed ALL has an excellent prognosis, and a MOLST discussion is not appropriate at the time of initial diagnosis. 2. Conditions in which there may be long phases of intensive treatment aimed at prolonging life and allowing participation in normal childhood activities, but premature death is anticipated. Young children with cystic fibrosis, Duchenne s muscular dystrophy, or well controlled HIV are not appropriate to have a MOLST discussion, as death may not happen for years. However, if health status and quality of life declines secondary to a serious complication or disease progression (e.g. a patient with cystic fibrosis who is listed for a lung transplant), thoughtful goals for care and MOLST discussions are appropriate. 3. Progressive conditions without curative treatment options, in which treatment is exclusively palliative and may commonly extend over many years. A child with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type I typically experiences steady decline with a life expectancy of only a few years. Thoughtful MOLST discussions are appropriate earlier in the course of disease. 4. Conditions with severe neurological disability which may cause weakness and susceptibility to health complications, and may deteriorate unpredictably, but are not considered progressive. Children with severe anoxic encephalopathy often have profound patient care needs, including poor airway control. Thoughtful goals for care and MOLST discussions are appropriate. Not every child with cerebral palsy is appropriate for a thoughtful MOLST discussion. However, complications such as scoliosis, severe restrictive lung disease, recurrent aspiration pneumonias, and feeding intolerance do put the child at risk for frequent hospitalizations, as well as ventilator support. With progressive complications, the condition ultimately can become life-threatening. In summary, as these children grow and develop such complications, MOLST discussions are appropriate. For a child who has phenylketonuria and is on appropriate diet, thoughtful MOLST discussions are not appropriate. When in the course of the child s illness might it be appropriate to discuss completing a MOLST form? In general, MOLST discussions are not automatically indicated for every child with a lifethreatening disease at the time of diagnosis. MOLST is not appropriate early in the course of a child s illness, particularly if the likelihood of cure is high. However, if the child is declining, if things are not going as expected, or if a child has a poor prognosis, MOLST discussions would be appropriate sooner rather than later. The timing of the discussion is reflective of a delicate balance between the particular needs of the child and family, the relationship of the pediatrician with the family, the nature of the child s disease and where the child is in the course of his/her disease.

How is a MOLST form completed for a minor patient? The MOLST form must be completed based on the patient s current medical condition, values, wishes, and informed consent by the minor patient who has decision-making capacity or his/her authorized decision-maker, i.e. the minor s parent, guardian or 1750-b Surrogate. Completion of the MOLST begins with a conversation or a series of conversations between the minor patient who has decision-making capacity or the authorized decision-maker and a qualified, trained health care professional that defines the patient s goals for care, reviews possible treatment options on the entire MOLST form, and ensures shared, informed medical decision-making. The conversation should be documented in the medical record. The MOLST orders cannot be issued without the consent of the patient or other medical decision-maker. Although the conversation(s) about goals and treatment options may be initiated by any qualified and trained health care professional, a licensed physician must always, at a minimum: (i) confer with the patient or authorized decision-maker about the patient s diagnosis, prognosis, goals for care, treatment preferences, and consent by the appropriate decision-maker, and (ii) sign the orders derived from that discussion. If the physician is licensed in a border state, the physician must insert the abbreviation for the state in which he/she is licensed, along with the license number. How much of the form should be completed for a minor patient? Completion of both the first and second pages of the MOLST form is strongly encouraged. However, the minor patient who has medical decision-making capacity or decision-maker (i.e. the parent or legal guardian) may not be physically or emotionally prepared to reach a decision concerning every treatment option on the form in a single meeting. Completion of only page 1 of the MOLST form (concerning CPR/DNR) is permissible, and page 2 (Section E) may be completed at a later time. If a minor patient who has medical decision-making capacity or decision-maker can reach a decision on one or more treatment options, but not others, on page 2, the physician should cross out the portion of the form with the treatment option(s) for which there is no decision and write Decision Deferred next to those treatment option(s). If the patient or decision-maker reaches a decision concerning that treatment option(s) at a later time, a new form must be completed and signed by a physician, indicating all of the minor patient s or decision-maker s decisions. The Department has developed Legal Requirements Checklists to assist providers in completing the forms with minor patients and/or their authorized medical decision-makers in various settings. The checklists are available at: http://www.health.ny.gov/professionals/patients/patient_rights/molst/ What are the standards by which a parent/guardian must make a decision on the MOLST? The parent s or legal guardian s decision must be patient-centered, in accordance with the patient's wishes, including the patient's religious and moral beliefs; or if the patient's wishes are not reasonably known and cannot with reasonable diligence be ascertained, in accordance with the patient's best interests. The parent s or legal guardian s assessment is based on the patient's wishes and best interests, not the parent s or guardian s, and includes consideration of: the dignity and uniqueness of every person; the possibility and extent of preserving the patient's life; the preservation, improvement or restoration of the patient's health or functioning; the relief of the patient's suffering; and any medical condition and such other concerns and values as a reasonable person in the patient's circumstances would wish to consider.

When should the child be included in a MOLST discussion? If a minor has the ability to understand the MOLST discussion, the child should be included in the discussion. Can the minor patient defer medical decision-making to the minor patient s parents or other legal guardians? When the minor patient has the capacity to make medical decisions as part of the MOLST discussion, the minor patient has the right to defer the medical decision-making to the parents or guardians. What if the minor patient has medical decision-making capacity and disagrees with one or both parents decisions about limiting life-sustaining treatment? If a minor has decision-making capacity, then a parent's decision to withhold or withdraw lifesustaining treatment may not be implemented without the minor's consent. The minor must agree and the decision cannot go forward without the minor's approval if the minor shows an ability to understand and appreciate the treatment decisions on the MOLST. If there is a lack of consensus (e.g. if the minor patient wants to stop and the parents want to continue), efforts should be made to resolve it informally if possible (e.g., through conflict resolution process, mediation, ethics consultation or the hospital ethics process). If efforts fail, the matter should be referred to the Ethics Review Committee. In the meantime, the MOLST cannot be completed until the conflict is resolved. What are the clinical standards a physician must use for DNR orders and medical orders to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment and thus, complete the MOLST? The attending physician, with the independent concurrence of another physician, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty and in accord with accepted medical standards, must agree that the parent or legal guardian s decision meets one of two clinical standards: 1. Treatment would be an extraordinary burden to the patient and 1) the patient has an illness or injury which can be expected to cause death within six months, whether or not treatment is provided; or 2) the patient is permanently unconscious. 2. The provision of treatment would involve such pain, suffering or other burden that it would reasonably be deemed inhumane or extraordinarily burdensome under the circumstances; and the patient has an irreversible or incurable condition. If clinical standard 2 is met, additional special requirements exist unless the patient is in hospice. In a hospital, when the medical order involves the withdrawal or withholding of artificial nutrition or hydration, and the attending physician objects to the order, the ethics review committee (including a physician who is not directly responsible for the patient s care) or an appropriate court must determine that the medical order meets the patient-centered and clinical standards. In a nursing home or in the community, for MOLST orders other than a DNR order, an ethics review committee, (including at least one physician who is not directly responsible for the patient's care) or an appropriate court must determine that the orders meet the patient-centered and clinical standards.

If the physician is having a thoughtful MOLST discussion based on goals for care in the home or office with parents of a terminally ill child and they wish for the child to not receive artificial fluids and nutrition, when can the decision be included on the MOLST form? If the terminally ill child resides in the community, the attending physician must agree that the parent or legal guardian s decision meets one of two clinical standards and a concurrent determination must be made by an independent physician: 1. Treatment would be an extraordinary burden to the patient and 1) the patient has an illness or injury which can be expected to cause death within six months, whether or not treatment is provided; or 2) the patient is permanently unconscious. 2. The provision of treatment would involve such pain, suffering or other burden that it would reasonably be deemed inhumane or extraordinarily burdensome under the circumstances; and the patient has an irreversible or incurable condition. If clinical standard 2 is met, additional special requirements exist unless the patient is in hospice. An ethics review committee, (including at least one physician who is not directly responsible for the patient's care) or an appropriate court must determine that the orders meet the patient-centered and clinical standards. The MOLST cannot be completed until the special requirement is met. What if my patient is > 18 years of age and his/her parents do not want me to discuss MOLST orders (e.g. DNR/DNI) with him/her. Can the MOLST form be completed based on the parents wishes? No. A patient who is > 18 years of age and who has medical decision-making capacity must consent to any limitations placed on his/her care. Further, a patient who is > 18 years of age has the right to choose a health care agent, including his/her parent. A patient who is > 18 years of age can defer medical decision-making to his/her health care agent. What if both parents have legal guardianship and they do not agree with each other on limiting life-sustaining treatment? If there is a dispute, efforts should be made to resolve it informally if possible (e.g., through conflict resolution process, mediation, ethics consultation or the hospital ethics process). If efforts fail, the matter should be referred to the Ethics Review Committee. In the meantime, the MOLST cannot be completed until the conflict is resolved. If a parent or guardian of a minor patient has made a decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment, must an attending notify a parent or guardian who has not been informed of the decision, including a non-custodial parent or guardian? Where a parent or guardian of a minor patient has made a decision to withhold or withdraw lifesustaining treatment and an attending physician has reason to believe that the minor patient has a parent or guardian who has not been informed of the decision, including a non-custodial parent or guardian, an attending physician or someone acting on his or her behalf, shall make reasonable efforts to determine if the uninformed parent or guardian has maintained substantial and continuous contact with the minor and, if so, shall make diligent efforts to notify that parent or guardian prior to implementing the decision. What are the decision-making standards a physician must use for DNR orders and medical orders to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment and thus, complete the MOLST for an emancipated minor patient? Minors, over the age of 16, who are living independently or have a child of their own, may be considered emancipated. Special considerations and requirements apply to decisions about life-sustaining treatment made by emancipated minors. Consult with legal counsel concerning MOLST orders for emancipated minors.