Russia s Maneuver Exercise Vostok-2018

Similar documents
Development of Russian Armed Forces in the Vicinity of Japan. Ministry of Defense, GOJ

NIDS Commentary No. 57

Nuclear Forces: Restore the Primacy of Deterrence

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES. for FY 2011 and beyond

ZAPAD 2017: Russia Demonstrating its Combat Readiness to NATO

CHINA S WHITE PAPER ON MILITARY STRATEGY

Section 4 Russia. 1. General Situation. 2. Security and Defense Policies. 1. Basic Posture. Part l Security Environment Surrounding Japan

SACT s remarks to UN ambassadors and military advisors from NATO countries. New York City, 18 Apr 2018

09/13/2017 ZAPAD-2017 Q&A. The Warsaw Institute Foundation

NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES, FY 2005-

Section 6. South Asia

Section 6. South Asia

Centre for Military and Strategic Studies. The European Union, Canada, and the Arctic: Challenges of International Governance.

Section 4. Russia. 1. General Situation. 2. Security and Defense Policies. 1. Basic Posture

9. Guidance to the NATO Military Authorities from the Defence Planning Committee 1967

Why Japan Should Support No First Use

North Korea s development of nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles poses a new level of threat

A FUTURE MARITIME CONFLICT

The State Defence Concept Executive Summary

Overview. Section 1 Trends in the International Community. Overview

II. Arms transfers and tensions in North East Asia

China U.S. Strategic Stability

Section 5 Southeast Asia

MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA. The State Defence Concept

Russia s New Conventional Capability

NATO's Nuclear Forces in the New Security Environment

A European Net Assessment of the People s Liberation Army (Navy)

ALLIANCE MARITIME STRATEGY

Role and Modernization Trends of China s Second Artillery

The Flying Shark Prepares to Roam the Seas: Strategic pros and cons of China s aircraft carrier program

1 General Situation. Section 4 Russia

The best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen,

Wales Summit Declaration

PS 4 (b) Director Cooperation

US Nuclear Policy: A Mixed Message

Frameworks for Responses to Armed Attack Situations

The U.S. Rebalance to the Asia-Pacific: Development and Prospects. No. 56 November 2, 2016

Issue Briefs. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More Published on Arms Control Association (

Statement of Vice Admiral Albert H. Konetzni, Jr. USN (Retired) Before the Projection Forces Subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee

New Opportunities and Challenges (Ver. 2.0)

1 Nuclear Weapons. Chapter 1 Issues in the International Community. Part I Security Environment Surrounding Japan

FINAL DECISION ON MC 48/2. A Report by the Military Committee MEASURES TO IMPLEMENT THE STRATEGIC CONCEPT

North Korea's Nuclear Programme and Ballistic Missile Capabilities: An Assessment

Great Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018

A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.2

Rebuilding Capabilities of Russian Navy to Be Long Process

EXPERT EVIDENCE REPORT

LAB4-W12: Nation Under Attack: Live Cyber- Exercise

Italy s Nuclear Anniversary: Fake Reassurance For a King s Ransom

Speech by Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera. Second Plenary Session. De-escalating the North Korean Crisis

Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT) I and II

Admiral Richardson: Thank you all. Thank you very much.

NATO MEASURES ON ISSUES RELATING TO THE LINKAGE BETWEEN THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM AND THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

Security Council. United Nations S/RES/1718 (2006) Resolution 1718 (2006) Adopted by the Security Council at its 5551st meeting, on 14 October 2006

UNIDIR RESOURCES IDEAS FOR PEACE AND SECURITY. Practical Steps towards Transparency of Nuclear Arsenals January Introduction

THE MILITARY STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA

ARMS CONTROL, SECURITY COOPERATION AND U.S. RUSSIAN RELATIONS

Background Briefing: Vietnam: President Obama Visits Vietnam - 15 Carlyle A. Thayer May 23, 2016

Axis and Allies Revised: Historical Edition (AARHE)

The Zapad-2017 exercises: the information war (for now)

What future for the European combat aircraft industry?

Section 3 Defense Equipment and Technology Cooperation

Policy Defence and National Security. Policy highlights. Protecting our interests

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

Remarks by President Bill Clinton On National Missile Defense

August 18, 1945 Telegram from Aleksandr Vasilevsky to Stalin

Sinai II Accords, Egyptian-Israeli Disengagement Agreement (4 September 1975)

Deployment of the THAAD System to South Korea Background and Issues Osamu Koike, Research Fellow, Security Studies Department

SA ARMY SEMINAR 21. The Revision of the South African Defence Review and International Trends in Force Design: Implications for the SA Army

Security Environment Surrounding Japan. The Basics of Japan s Defense Policy and Build-up of Defense Capability. Measures for Defense of Japan

mm*. «Stag GAO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE Information on Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and Other Theater Missile Defense Systems 1150%

DEFENSE CAPABILITIES AND THE DEFENSE CAPABILITIES INITIATIVE

Turkey Doesn t Need Article V NATO Support to Defend Itself Against Syria. by John Noble

Issue 16-04B (No. 707) March 22, THAAD 2. CHINA S CORE KOREA POLICY 3. UN SANCTIONS WHICH ONE NEXT? 5.

Russia s Eastbound Policy

Chapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 3

The International Institute for Strategic Studies

NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL: THE END OF HISTORY?

Section 3 Counter-piracy Operations

Also this week, we celebrate the signing of the New START Treaty, which was ratified and entered into force in 2011.

THE ESTONIAN DEFENCE FORCES

Global Vigilance, Global Reach, Global Power for America

Towards a European Non-Proliferation Strategy. May 23, 2003, Paris

Nuclear Disarmament Weapons Stockpiles

Restructuring and Modernization of the Romanian Armed Forces for Euro-Atlantic Integration Capt.assist. Aurelian RAŢIU

Chapter 2: The Nuclear Age

1 Promotion of Various Preparations for New Missions Based on the Legislation for Peace and Security

Section 6. Defense-Related Expenditures 1. Defense-Related Expenditures and Changes

Development of the Dynamic Defense Force

Russia News. Focus on a more operational partnership. issue 3. NATO-Russia Council (NRC) defence ministers meet informally in Berlin

Procurement Facilitation Paper: Vietnam

Thank you for inviting me to discuss the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

Active Endeavour ATO. NATO naval operations

- PROTOCOL V - (As adopted by the First Conference at its second plenary meeting on 5 November 2007)

Assessing Technologies using Campaign Analysis and War Gaming: The Warfare Innovation Continuum at NPS

FORWARD, READY, NOW!

Building a Dynamic Joint Defense Force

ABOUT THE MILITARY COMMITTEE (MC)

NATO. Canada & The Cold War. Canada and the Creation of NATO. Chapter 8-9 Social Studies

Modern Arms Control Challenges

Transcription:

Russia s Maneuver Exercise Vostok-2018 Hiroshi Yamazoe America, Europe, Russia Division, Regional Studies Department Russia has four integrated military districts and conducts large-scale strategic military exercises in each of the military districts in sequence in a four-year cycle. The Vostok exercise in the Eastern Military District was conducted in 2018, following on from the 2010 and 2014 exercises. The Vostok-2018 maneuver exercise held from September 11 to 17 drew much attention as it was announced that the exercise would mobilize the largest number of troops since 1981, would be participated by the Chinese People s Liberation Army (PLA), and would coincide with the Eastern Economic Forum and summit meetings in Vladivostok. To assess the extent to which it poses as an issue to Japan, it is necessary to put the exercise into context. This article begins by examining the significance of Vostok-2018 in sending out political messages. It then attempts to deepen understanding of the exercise in the context of Russia s military buildup in the Eastern Military District. 1. Political message: Defense intentions, partnership with China, and limited expression of hostility Since 2014, Russia and the West have been in a confrontational relationship, and Russia has sent out strong messages and taken firm actions that were nothing short of inciting deterioration in their relationship. Even so, the executive order issued by President Vladimir Putin in May 2018 upon the inauguration of his fourth term as President did not emphasize military issues, contrary to the 2012 executive order. Furthermore, Russia has sought to avoid a long-term increase of defense spending in recent years compared to around 2015, leaving greater room for interpretation that Russia will not follow a hardline military course. Nevertheless, at this timing Russia announced that Vostok-2018 would mobilize 300,000 personnel the largest number of troops since 1981, 1,000 aircraft, 80 vessels, and 36,000 combat vehicles. It was a signal by Russian authorities to the people of Russia that it will remain a country with strong military capabilities. It was also likely intended to show to other countries that Russia is putting efforts into military preparedness and assert that Russia should not be taken lightly. To send out a warning, it was critical that 3,500 PLA personnel participated for the first time in a Russian military district-level exercise. In July 2013, immediately after a Russia-China maritime joint exercise finished near Vladivostok, Russia s Armed Forces started a snap inspection exercise (according to Russia s announcement, 160,000 personnel, 5,000 combat vehicles, and 70 vessels) and President Putin visited the Tsugol training range near the Mongolia-China border. At the time, I interpreted this as Russia s preparations for potential ground clashes with China, deploying the most number of army brigades to the Eastern Military District, all the while cooperating with China. Since the deterioration of 1

the Russia-West relationship in 2014, Russia has approached China to a greater extent than before and has exported relatively advanced weapons, such as the Su-35 fighter and the S-400 surface-to-air missile system. As part of Vostok- 2018, PLA conducted exercises with Russia s Armed Forces in the Tsugol range, the same place as 2013, and learned from Russia about asymmetric operations and the experience of bombers in Syria, further deepening the interdependent relationship between Russia and China. It is widely viewed that Russia will clash with China at some point. Even if such is the case, most likely Russia wished to signal that the two countries will not become adversaries for some time to come, and that a considerable price would be needed to separate Russia from China. This raises the question: has Russia basically entered into an alliance relationship with China and is it signaling a confrontational posture towards the Japan-U.S. alliance? At the Eastern Economic Forum held at the same time as Vostok- 2018, the MC brought up the issue of the Japan-Russia peace treaty and the Japan-U.S. alliance. President Putin touched upon the problems of missile defense and stated his intention to work towards concluding a peace treaty before resolving the territorial dispute, steering the news coverage. The President did not mention that the U.S. Forces were a threat or that a transfer of islands to Japan would be dangerous to Russia because of the Japan-U.S. alliance. If President Putin had made such remarks at this forum a meeting for discussing economic cooperation with China s President Xi Jinping and Japan s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and furthermore, had Russia conducted military exercises on the disputed islands of the Northern Territories at this timing, it would have become clear that the Russia-China alliance adopts a confrontational posture towards the Japan-U.S. alliance. On the flipside, the Abe administration s Russia diplomacy would have lost momentum and Russia would not enjoy the kind of cooperative relationship with Japan it desires. As such, Russia sent out the message that it is ready to engage in war if the necessity arises and will work with China, but that it will not immediately confront Japan and the United States. Ever since the arrival of President Donald Trump in 2017, the West has taken a firm stance towards Russia and has strengthened sanctions on Russia over the attempted poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in the United Kingdom, suspicions about Russia s influencing of public opinion, and other issues. Nonetheless, Russia has not made maximum use of military confrontations and confrontational rhetoric. Russia may have deemed that this was not the timing for deteriorating the situation. 2. Russia s military buildup: Ground defense and defense of the Sea of Okhotsk Still, Russia has continued to engage in military preparations even under limited resource consumption. Improvements in Russia s capabilities mean that Russia would have more choices when a crisis occurs and its adversaries would have fewer measures at their disposal. For example, if a conflict were to occur in the western Baltic Sea, it is expected that Russia s capabilities such as missiles, vessels, and aircraft would significantly interfere with NATO s deployment of support troops. This has continued to pose as a fundamental issue to NATO s collective defense. In this sense, attention needs to be paid to the capabilities possessed by Russia s Armed Forces if and when crises occur in the future. Most of the headlines on Vostok-2018 were about the mobilization of the largest number of troops on the ground. Attention should however be paid to improvements in the ability to quickly command and control (C2) diverse units rather than to the troop size. In 2017, the Zapad-2017 military exercise was conducted in Russia s Western Military District and Belarus. While they claimed that the exercise involved a total of 12,700 people, many news articles estimated that a larger 2

number of troops was actually mobilized. Mathieu Boulègue, a research fellow with Chatham House, notes that a largescale troop displacement was already conducted during Zapad-2013 four years earlier, and Zapad-2017 focused on quick C2 of units that were not too large. Similarly, with regard to Vostok-2018, attention should be paid not only to troop strength but also to unit displacement capabilities. Indeed, unlike Europe which has a troop threshold under the Vienna document (if the number of troops will exceed 13,000, countries are obligated to accept observers to observe the exercise freely), Russia may conduct military exercises employing a large number of troops without being bound by this threshold, in areas east of the Ural Mountains. For this reason, there may have been significance in conducting an exercise in the Eastern Military District by mobilizing troops of a size that would be operational in Europe in a contingency. In addition to the mobilization scale, however, another point worth noting is that, on the ground, the exercise involved C2 of the drills of not only combat vehicles and infantry but also multiple military services and assets, such as helicopter, airborne troops, surface-to-air missile, and bomber. It indicates that Russia s Armed Forces continues to make the shift from the great war model of the past, to modern warfare fought by integrating multiple military services and assets. In addition, Vostok-2018 commanded the actions of maritime units and verified their ability to take swift actions in a range of scenarios. Maritime defense in the Far East and the Arctic was an actual priority that was highlighted when Putin returned to the presidency in 2012. The logic holds that, even if the primary fronts of Russia s Armed forces are Europe and the Caucasus Mountains, it needs to be prepared for a possible attack against vulnerable regions should military conflicts with foreign adversaries escalate. Up until about 2010, the Arctic and the Far East were low on Russia s priority list and remained in a state of obsolescence since the 1990s. Russia has been strengthening its defense of the Arctic and the Far East since 2012 and their defense is recovering in this context. The Vostok-2014 exercise four years ago (according to Russia s announcement, 155,000 personnel and 8,000 fighters, vessels, and other assets) presented the notion that the area around the Sea of Okhotsk and the Arctic Ocean area were a contiguous defense front. In the snap inspection conducted shortly beforehand, units stationed on the continent were moved to peripheral areas in the east and north, and then live ammunition drills were conducted in the Vostok-2014 exercise. In the Sea of Okhotsk, two Borei-class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (two more to be added later) renovated in Petropavlovsk on the Kamchatka Peninsula are conducting activities. The Sea of Okhotsk is considered a critical base for second strike strategic nuclear force for surviving and launching a counterattack in the event of an attack on the mainland. Therefore, the Kuril Islands (Russian term for what the Government of Japan calls the Four Northern Islands and Chishima Islands, combined), which serve as a gateway to the Pacific, are included in the line of defense. In August 2016, Minister of Defence Shoigu announced that Russia had a plan to build a coastal defense system in these waters, and made clear that strategic nuclear force would be ensured by securing the safety of navigation in the Sea of Okhotsk and the Bering Strait. The measures taken by Russia s Armed Forces around this time appear to be part of a process for realizing this concept. Russia s Armed Forces conducted a survey of Matua Island, saying that it would build a new outpost in the middle section of the Kuril Islands. Russia has installed a runway on Matua Island, and it seems it will establish another outpost on Paramushir Island in the north. Russia s initiative to deploy missiles on the Northern Territories has been reported from 3

around 2010, and in November 2016, it was reported that a set of anti-ship missiles called the Bal missile was deployed to Kunashiri Island and the Bastion missile to Etorofu Island. In February 2017, the Ministry of Defence of Russia announced that a division would be organized on the Kuril Islands as part of its coastal defense system. In July 2017, a Steregushchyclass Sovershenny frigate was deployed to Vladivostok, the first new surface vessel for the Pacific Fleet since the Cold War. Four more new vessels and missiles are expected to be deployed. Vostok-2018 held from September 11 to 17, 2018 included maritime activities in the northern part of the Sea of Okhotsk but no activities on the Northern Territories islands, contrary to Vostok-2014. The latest exercise did not unveil any concrete vision for the coastal defense system and did not appear to be a military exercise for dealing with maximum situations on the sea. That said, military exercises covering the Northern Territories islands, which are unacceptable to Japan, were in fact conducted in 2018, with reports of the flight of Su-35 fighters in March and launch of anti-ship missiles in June. The main forces of the fighter units, even if they are on the continent, have begun to be operated using the airfield on Etorofu Island. In this regard, Etorofu Island has certainly become an asset Russia that does not wish to give up, even more than before. In August, Russia conducted a relatively large-scale vessel operation in the Sea of Okhotsk. On September 3, the Joint Staff Office announced that 28 Russian vessels sailed through the La Pérouse Strait on their return to Russia. The Vostok-2018 exercise did not entail the largest defense operation in waters around Japan. Still, drills were carried out in a section of such waters, and attention should be paid to Russia s Armed Forces continued intention to boost its military capabilities and conduct exercises in waters extending from the Sea of Okhotsk to the Bering Strait. 3. Points of note on Russia s present situation and future The Vostok-2018 maneuver exercise was aimed at sending out a political message that Russia attaches importance to having strong military capabilities, as well as enhancing certain military capabilities, such as C2 capabilities for integrated operations and maritime defense arrangements. It should not be interpreted immediately that Russia and China are preparing for warfare involving many troops against Japan and the West. Rather, attention should be paid to the fact that Russia s confrontational posture is limited at this time and that Russia has military objectives, such as the maritime defense concept, that is not limited to this exercise. In actuality, Russia s capabilities for asymmetrical operations through the use of small units and non-military means, as seen in Ukraine and the periphery of the Baltic Sea, are posing as challenges. In the periphery of Japan, continued attention needs to be paid to Russia s intentions and the changes in its capabilities. Referenced Sources - Mathieu Boulègue, Five Things to Know About the Zapad-2017 Military Exercise, Chatham House, 25 September 2017 - Mathieu Boulègue, Russia s Vostok Exercises Were Both Serious Planning and a Show, Chatham House, 17 September 2018 - Johan Norberg, Vostok-2018: about the Russian military s brain, not its muscles, RUFS Briefing No. 43, FOI (Swedish Defence Research Agency), 20 September 2018 (Completed on October 5, 2018) 4

The views expressed in this column are solely those of authors and do not represent the official views of NIDS. We do not permit any unauthorized reproduction or unauthorized copying of the article. Please contact us at the following regarding any questions, comments or requests you may have. Planning and Management Division, Planning and Administration Department, NIDS Telephone: +81-3-3260-3011 ext.: 8-6-29171 FAX: +81-3-3260-3034 *NIDS Website: http://www.nids.mod.go.jp/ 5