H. RES. 568 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Similar documents
May 8, 2018 NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM/NSPM-11

Chapter 4 The Iranian Threat

1. INSPECTIONS AND VERIFICATION Inspectors must be permitted unimpeded access to suspect sites.

The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going forward

1 Nuclear Weapons. Chapter 1 Issues in the International Community. Part I Security Environment Surrounding Japan

1

Assessing the Iran Nuclear Agreement and The Washington Institute s Iran Study Group June 24 Policy Statement

U.S.-GCC Relations: Closing the Credibility Gap

THE NUCLEAR WORLD IN THE EARLY 21 ST CENTURY

S To prevent nuclear proliferation in North Korea, and for other purposes. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

Adopted by the Security Council at its 5612th meeting, on 23 December 2006

Adopted by the Security Council at its 6733rd meeting, on 12 March 2012

ASSESSMENT REPORT. The Iranian Nuclear Program: a Final Agreement

Adopted by the Security Council at its 5710th meeting, on 29 June 2007

UNITED STATES AND INDIA NUCLEAR COOPERATION

RESUME OF RONALD J. SIEVERT

General Assembly First Committee. Topic A: Nuclear Non-Proliferation in the Middle East

Biological and Chemical Weapons. Ballistic Missiles. Chapter 2

Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran

(15) VerDate Sep :18 May 12, 2016 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A532.XXX A532

SS.7.C.4.3 Describe examples of how the United States has dealt with international conflicts.

The President. Part V. Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Iran Nuclear Deal: The Limits of Diplomatic Niceties

Adopted by the Security Council at its 4987th meeting, on 8 June 2004

The United States and Israel s Conflict with Iran: The Role of Hezbollah. Johny Woodward. Hezbollah s Flag:

CRS Report for Congress

The 38 th Security Consultative Meeting Joint Communiqué

Question of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and of weapons of mass destruction MUNISH 11

HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE-4. Subject: National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction

Security Council. United Nations S/RES/1718 (2006) Resolution 1718 (2006) Adopted by the Security Council at its 5551st meeting, on 14 October 2006

2 Articles on Just Published State Department Country Reports on

Rethinking the Nuclear Terrorism Threat from Iran and North Korea

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE CHUCK HAGEL SOREF SYMPOSIUM WASHINGTON INSTUTUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY WASHINGTON, DC THURSDAY, MAY 9, 2013

H. R. ll IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES A BILL

Nukes: Who Will Have the Bomb in the Middle East? Dr. Gary Samore. WCFIA/CMES Middle East Seminar Harvard University October 4, 2018

Section 6. South Asia

COUNCIL DECISION 2014/913/CFSP

Nuclear Physics 7. Current Issues

Iran and the NPT SUMMARY

Application of Safeguards in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

Coalition Press Conference: Findings on Houthi Ballistic Missile Attacks on the. the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

North Korea has invited Hecker to visit its nuclear facilities on several other occasions to provide confirmation of certain nuclear activities.

Iran Nuclear Agreement

Iran Nuclear Agreement

Security Council. United Nations S/RES/1747 (2007) Resolution 1747 (2007) Adopted by the Security Council at its 5647th meeting on 24 March 2007

Iran Nuclear Agreement

Annex 1. Guidelines for international arms transfers in the context of General Assembly resolution 46/36 H of 6 December 1991

124 STAT PUBLIC LAW JAN. 7, 2011

GREAT DECISIONS WEEK 8 NUCLEAR SECURITY

APPENDIX 1. Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty A chronology

I. Acquisition by Country

SHOWDOWN IN THE MIDDLE EAST

NATO MEASURES ON ISSUES RELATING TO THE LINKAGE BETWEEN THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM AND THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

President Obama and National Security

Iran s Nuclear Program: Tehran s Compliance with International Obligations

Threats to Peace and Prosperity

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 R E P O R T COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.R. 5136

Iran s Nuclear Program: Tehran s Compliance with International Obligations

A/55/116. General Assembly. United Nations. General and complete disarmament: Missiles. Contents. Report of the Secretary-General

Arms Control and Proliferation Profile: The United Kingdom

International Nonproliferation Regimes after the Cold War

[Discussion Draft] [DISCUSSION DRAFT] SEPTEMBER 9, H. R. ll

Iran's Military Forces and Warfighting Capabilities

H. R. ll [Report No. 115 ll]

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333: UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

H. R To direct the Department of Energy to support fusion energy innovation, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Testimony before the House Committee on International Relations Hearing on the US-India Global Partnership and its Impact on Non- Proliferation

Hillary Clinton Opening Statement to House Select Committee on Benghazi

Foreign Policy and National Defense. Chapter 22

SECTION 4 IRAQ S WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM (ARF) NON-PROLIFERATION AND DISARMAMENT (NPD) WORK PLAN

Address to the Nation on the Threat of Iraq. delivered 7 October 2002, Cincinnati Union Terminal, Cincinnati, Ohio

2017 Washington Model Organization of American States General Assembly. Crisis Scenario Resolution. General Committee

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910

Source: Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents (May 14, 2007), v.43 n.19, p

Note verbale dated 3 November 2004 from the Permanent Mission of Kazakhstan to the United Nations addressed to the Chairman of the Committee

Interim Agreement on Iran s Nuclear Program

The president received highly classified intelligence reports containing information at odds with his justifications for going to war.

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

(13) VerDate Sep :13 Jun 08, 2018 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A040.XXX A040

Does President Trump have the authority to totally destroy North Korea?

Nuclear Terrorism: Threat Briefing How Serious is the Threat?

Revelations about a new nuclear site under construction by the Iranian regime. Madan Sharq (Kothar Project) July 2013

ASSEMBLY 36TH SESSION

Public Law th Congress An Act

TEKS 8C: Calculate percent composition and empirical and molecular formulas. Kennedy s Foreign Policy

Chapter Nineteen Reading Guide American Foreign & Defense Policy. Answer each question as completely as possible and in blue or black ink only

Welcoming the restoration to Kuwait of its sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity and the return of its legitimate Government.

The Executive Branch: Foreign Policy

Iranian Nuclear Issue

UNDOING OBAMA S DAMAGE TO AMERICA

A/56/136. General Assembly. United Nations. Missiles. Contents. Report of the Secretary-General

Dear Delegates, It is a pleasure to welcome you to the 2014 Montessori Model United Nations Conference.

Iran Nuclear Agreement

: SRI LANKA NEGOTIATING TO PROCURE LETHAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT FROM NORTH KOREA AND IRAN

S IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

S [Report No ] To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,

1st Session Mr. LUGAR, from the Committee on Foreign Relations, submitted the following REPORT. [To accompany Treaty Doc.

American Public Attitudes toward North Korea s Nuclear and Missile Programs

Transcription:

IV 112TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. RES. 568 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the importance of preventing the Government of Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MARCH 1, 2012 Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. TURNER of New York, and Mr. DEUTCH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs RESOLUTION Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the importance of preventing the Government of Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability. Whereas since at least the late 1980s, Iran has engaged in a sustained and well-documented pattern of illicit and deceptive activities to acquire a nuclear capability; Whereas the United Nations Security Council has adopted multiple resolutions since 2006 demanding the full and sustained suspension of all uranium enrichment-related and reprocessing activities by the Iranian Government and its full cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on all outstanding issues related VerDate Mar 15 2010 23:57 Mar 01, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR568.IH HR568

2 to its nuclear activities, particularly those concerning the possible military dimensions of its nuclear program; Whereas, on November 8, 2011, the IAEA issued an extensive report that (1) documents serious concerns regarding possible military dimensions to Iran s nuclear programme ; (2) states that Iran has carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear device ; and (3) states that the efforts described in paragraphs (1) and (2) may be ongoing; Whereas as of November 2008, Iran had produced, according to the IAEA (1) approximately 630 kilograms of uranium-235 enriched to 3.5 percent; and (2) no uranium-235 enriched to 20 percent; Whereas as of November 2011, Iran had produced, according to the IAEA (1) nearly 5,000 kilograms of uranium-235 enriched to 3.5 percent; and (2) 79.7 kilograms of uranium-235 enriched to 20 percent; Whereas, on January 9, 2011, IAEA inspectors confirmed that the Iranian Government had begun enrichment activities at the Fordow site, including possibly enrichment of uranium-235 to 20 percent; Whereas if Iran were successful in acquiring a nuclear weapon capability, it would likely spur other countries in the region to consider developing their own nuclear weapons capabilities; Whereas, on December 6, 2011, Prince Turki al-faisal of Saudi Arabia stated that if international efforts to pre- VerDate Mar 15 2010 23:57 Mar 01, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR568.IH HR568

3 vent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons fail, we must, as a duty to our country and people, look into all options we are given, including obtaining these weapons ourselves ; Whereas top Iranian leaders have repeatedly threatened the existence of the State of Israel, pledging to wipe Israel off the map ; Whereas the Department of State (1) has designated Iran as a State Sponsor of Terrorism since 1984; and (2) has characterized Iran as the most active state sponsor of terrorism ; Whereas Iran has provided weapons, training, funding, and direction to terrorist groups, including Hamas, Hezbollah, and Shiite militias in Iraq that are responsible for the murders of hundreds of American forces and innocent civilians; Whereas, on July 28, 2011, the Department of the Treasury charged that the Government of Iran had forged a secret deal with al Qaeda to facilitate the movement of al Qaeda fighters and funding through Iranian territory; Whereas in October 2011, senior leaders of Iran s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Quds Force were implicated in a terrorist plot to assassinate Saudi Arabia s Ambassador to the United States on United States soil; Whereas, on December 26, 2011, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution denouncing the serious human rights abuses occurring in Iran, including torture, cruel and degrading treatment in detention, the targeting of human rights defenders, violence against women, and the systematic and serious restrictions on freedom of VerDate Mar 15 2010 23:57 Mar 01, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR568.IH HR568

4 peaceful assembly as well as severe restrictions on the rights to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief ; Whereas President Obama has made repeated efforts through the P5+1 process to engage the Iranian Government in dialogue about Iran s nuclear program and its international commitments under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation Nuclear Weapons; Whereas in the 2006 State of the Union Address, President Bush stated that The Iranian Government is defying the world with its nuclear ambitions, and the nations of the world must not permit the Iranian regime to gain nuclear weapons. ; Whereas, on March 31, 2010, President Obama stated that the consequences of a nuclear-armed Iran are unacceptable ; Whereas in his State of the Union Address on January 24, 2012, President Obama stated: Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal ; Whereas Secretary of Defense Panetta stated, in December 2011, that it was unacceptable for Iran to acquire nuclear weapons, reaffirmed that all options were on the table to thwart Iran s nuclear weapons efforts, and vowed that if the United States gets intelligence that they are proceeding with developing a nuclear weapon then we will take whatever steps necessary to stop it ; Whereas, on December 1, 2011, Deputy Secretary of State William J. Burns and Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Daniel Ayalon issued a joint statement in Washington, VerDate Mar 15 2010 23:57 Mar 01, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR568.IH HR568

5 DC, which emphasized that Iran is the greatest challenge we face today in the Middle East and that [c]ontinued efforts by the international community are critical to bringing about change in Iranian behavior and preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapons capability. ; and Whereas the Department of Defense s January 2012 Strategic Guidance stated that United States defense efforts in the Middle East would be aimed to prevent Iran s development of a nuclear weapons capability and counter its destabilizing policies : Now, therefore, be it 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Resolved, That the House of Representatives (1) warns that time is limited to prevent the Government of Iran from acquiring a nuclear weap- ons capability; (2) urges continued and increasing economic and diplomatic pressure on Iran to secure an agree- ment with the Government of Iran that includes (A) the full and sustained suspension of all uranium enrichment-related and reprocessing activities; (B) complete cooperation with the IAEA on all outstanding questions related to Iran s nuclear activities, including (i) the implementation of the Addi- tional Protocol to the Treaty on the Non- Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons; and VerDate Mar 15 2010 23:57 Mar 01, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR568.IH HR568

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 6 (ii) the verified end of Iran s ballistic missile programs; and (C) a permanent agreement that verifiably assures that Iran s nuclear program is entirely peaceful; (3) expresses support for the universal rights and democratic aspirations of the Iranian people; (4) affirms that it is a vital national interest of the United States to prevent the Government of Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability; (5) strongly supports United States policy to prevent the Government of Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability; (6) rejects any United States policy that would rely on efforts to contain a nuclear weapons-capable Iran; and (7) urges the President to reaffirm the unacceptability of an Iran with nuclear-weapons capability and opposition to any policy that would rely on containment as an option in response to the Iranian nuclear threat. Æ VerDate Mar 15 2010 23:57 Mar 01, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6301 E:\BILLS\HR568.IH HR568