Russia s Naval Renewal. Dr. Michael B. Petersen Director, Russia Maritime Studies Institute United States Naval War College

Similar documents
Rebuilding Capabilities of Russian Navy to Be Long Process

A FUTURE MARITIME CONFLICT

Trusted Partner in guided weapons

Development of Russian Armed Forces in the Vicinity of Japan. Ministry of Defense, GOJ

Russian Naval Shipbuilding

Chapter 13 Air and Missile Defense THE AIR THREAT AND JOINT SYNERGY

David Child-Dennis MODERN NAVAL RULES FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY 1

ASSIGNMENT An element that enables a seadependent nation to project its political, economic, and military strengths seaward is known as 1-5.

Background Briefing: Vietnam: Evaluating its Fleet of Six Kilo-class Submarines Carlyle A. Thayer February 25, 2017

Challenges and opportunities Trends to address New concepts for: Capability and program implications Text

OHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence

The Air Force View of IAMD in a Joint Environment

Setting Priorities for Nuclear Modernization. By Lawrence J. Korb and Adam Mount February

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION

Russian defense industrial complex s possibilities for development of advanced BMD weapon systems

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

Anti-Access/Area Denial Challenges

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

Introduction to missiles

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

Air Defense System Solutions.

Military Radar Applications

Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157)

The Cruise Missile Threat: Prospects for Homeland Defense

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

Prepared Remarks of the Honorable Ray Mabus Secretary of the Navy Purdue University 8 May 2014

Air-Sea Battle & Technology Development

SOVIET STRATEGIC FORCE DEVELOPMENTS

Aerial Targets & Unmanned Aviation

CHINA S WHITE PAPER ON MILITARY STRATEGY

Punching up: Russia's smaller surface fleet builds bigger impact

Nuclear Forces: Restore the Primacy of Deterrence

Armed Unmanned Systems

LESSON 4: THE U.S. NAVY

Role and Modernization Trends of China s Second Artillery

Detect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats. Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success

Commander Submarine Force U.S. Pacific Fleet CAPT Gene Doyle. USS MONTANA Committee Steering Group. USS North Carolina Homecoming

French response to air and ballistic missile threats

SIMULEX People s Republic of China Military Forces in 2017

The best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen,

From Russia, To Russia:

Winning in Close Combat Ground Forces in Multi-Domain Battle

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Lieutenant Commander, thank you so much. And thank you all for being here today. I

FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK

Statement of Vice Admiral Albert H. Konetzni, Jr. USN (Retired) Before the Projection Forces Subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee

Reconsidering the Relevancy of Air Power German Air Force Development

MANAGING NUCLEAR MISSILE COMPETITIONS BETWEEN INDIA, PAKISTAN AND CHINA

Fighter/ Attack Inventory

Great Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018

The Integral TNO Approach to NAVY R&D

CHINA MARITIME STUDIES INSTITUTE (CMSI) CONFERENCE CHINA S NAVAL SHIPBUILDING: PROGRESS AND CHALLENGES

A Ready, Modern Force!

April 25, Dear Mr. Chairman:

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES. for FY 2011 and beyond

Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

Perspectives on the 2013 Budget Request and President Obama s Guidance on the Future of the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program

Issue Briefs. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More Published on Arms Control Association (

FM AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY BRIGADE OPERATIONS

SHARPENING THE SPEAR

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Technical parameters of the 9K720 Iskander (SS-26 Stone)

Analysis of Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Bill: HR Differences Between House and Senate NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

The Competition for Access and Influence. Seabasing

The Future of the Trident Force

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162

MISSILE S&T STRATEGIC OVERVIEW

Navy of the Soviet Union and Russian Federation

Department of the Navy FY 2006/FY 2007 President s Budget. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow

GLOBAL STRIKE THE INDISPENSABLE CAPABILITY FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

United States Air Force and Military Aircraft

4 Aug 92. Encl: From: Commanding Officer, USS MICHIGAN (SSBN 727) To: Director of Naval History (0-09BH), Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20374

Building Canada s Next Navy: Strategic Basis and Fleet Mix

October 2017 SWIM CALL

of the Russian Strategic Forces

Next Gen Armored Reconnaissance: ARV Introduction and Requirements. - Brief to Industry-

With nearly sixty years of

Triad, Dyad, Monad? Shaping U.S. Nuclear Forces for the Future. Presentation to the Air Force Association Mitchell Institute for Airpower Studies

Differences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

TESTIMONY STATEMENT BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE ON RESHAPING THE MILITARY. February 16, 2017

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : Undersea Warfare Advanced Technology

Jane's Defence Weekly. Rearming Russia. [Content preview Subscribe to IHS Jane s Defence Weekly for full article]

Su S rface Force Strategy Return to Sea Control

Go Tactical to Succeed By Capt. Ryan Stephenson

Global Vigilance, Global Reach, Global Power for America

U.S. Nuclear Strategy After the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF VICE ADMIRAL JOHN J. DONNELLY COMMANDER NAVAL SUBMARINE FORCES

Section 6. South Asia

Praeger, 2008). 1 Dennis M. Gormley, Missile Contagion: Cruise Missile Proliferation and the Threat to International Security (Santa Barbara, CA:

Background Data: Nuclear Weapons, Missiles, and the Red Dragon Rising Game. The Atomic Bomb

The Atomic Bomb. Background Data: Nuclear Weapons, Missiles, and the Red Dragon Rising Game. Offensive and Defensive Responses

KEY NOTE ADRESS AT ASSOCIATION OF OLD CROWS

Russia s New Conventional Capability

Global Positioning System Use by the Military EV478

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO. An Analysis of the Navy s Fiscal Year 2017 Shipbuilding Plan

Iran's Military Forces and Warfighting Capabilities

Precision Strike Winter Roundtable

Foreword. Gordon England Secretary of the Navy

Transcription:

Russia s Naval Renewal Dr. Michael B. Petersen Director, Russia Maritime Studies Institute United States Naval War College 1

Russian Federation Navy Missions Missions: 1. Ensure nuclear deterrence (provide survivable second strike capability) SSBNs as an essential element of Russian security 2. Provide credible conventional deterrence, prior to and during war Sderzhivanie ( restraining, keeping out, holding back, containment Escalation management 3. Defense of SSBN bastions and maritime approaches to Russia Primary mission of the non-ssbn fleet 4. Power projection around the globe Russia does not have an A2/AD doctrine Sometimes uses the phrase restriction and denial of access and maneuver (ogranicheniye i vospreshcheniye dostupa i manyuvra) 2

2017: Russian Naval Fundamentals Strategic Deterrence Это более This Это бесстыдный is shameless бесстыдный маркетинг marketing. маркетинг IV. The Navy as an Effective Instrument of Strategic Deterrence 32. The Navy is one of the most effective instruments of strategic (nuclear and nonnuclear) deterrence, including preventing global strike. This is due to the Navy possessing strategic nuclear and conventional naval forces and the ability to implement its combat potential in virtually any area of the World Ocean.. 3

2017: Russian Naval Fundamentals Aspirations: This Это is более more бесстыдный shameless маркетинг marketing. V. Naval Strategic Requirements. Objectives and Priorities for its Modernization and Development 39. The Russian Federation will not allow significant superiority of naval forces of other states over its Navy and will strive to secure its position as the second most combat capable Navy in the world. 4

Say what? 5

The Soviet Military, 1986 6

Force Levels, 1986 vs. 2018 7

What is Russia Building? 8

ISR: Space and Air Space-based: 2 Lotos-S electronic intelligence (ELINT) satellites Air-breathing maritime patrol (and ASW): Il-38 May (22), Tu-95 Bear-F High-demand, low-density assets No armaments Bottom line: Russia s space-based and air-breathing ISR assets are limited in number and/or vulnerable to attack High-demand, low density platforms 9

Red Storm Rising? Not so much: The Russian Federation Navy will destroy enemy land-based facilities at long distances. -- Russian Federation Ministry of Defense Part of the role of RFN is to attack the critically important ground-based facilities of the adversary, without violating, until a certain moment, its national sovereignty. -- A.N. Popov, Ya. V. Yeshchenko, The Sea Power of the State in the 21 st Century, Voennaya Mysl, 2014. Standoff weapons will destroy critically important ground-based facilities of the adversary and maritime carriers that are the global strike assets before these can move to the line of weapon employment. -- O.V. Alyoshin, A.N. Popov., V.V. Puchnin, The Naval Might of Russia in Today s Geopolitical Situation, Voennaya Mysl, 2016. 10

ISR: Shore-Based Konteyner Skywave Over-the-Horizon Radar (OTHR) Capable of detecting aircraft and missiles, both ballistic and cruise, at 3,000 km away at altitudes of up to 100 km Pointed west, coverage into the North Sea and beyond Podsulnukh Surface Wave OTHR Capable of detecting sea, surface, and air objects at 450 km Can simultaneously detect, track and classify up to 300 sea and 100 aerial targets in an automatic mode Monolit-B and others Passive/active detection for CDCM systems (SSC-5) Up to 450 km detection (passive) Up to 250 km detection (active, with surface ducting) Surface and air detection 11

Key Weapons Systems: ASCMs/LACMs/ALCMs Focus of new programs is on long-range, high precision weapons Reflect Russian interest in standoff weapons since 1991 ISR enables these systems Key ASCMs/LACMs: SS-N-26 ASCM: 160 nm range(export variant), Mach 2.5, equipped with an advanced radar seeker, terminal maneuvers; available as CDCM (SSC-5) SS-N-27 ASCM: 119 nm range, subsonic cruise, supersonic terminal, and terminal maneuvers SS-N-30A LACM: 450 kg conventional warhead, waypoint navigation, roughly 1000nm range Key ALCM: Kh-101 LACM: maximum range 5500 km (3418 miles), terrain mapping, inertial guidance, and GPS, LO properties 12

Key Weapons Systems: SAMs ISR enables these systems Key SAMs SA-20 (S-300): Medium/long-range, up to 150 km/80 nm; TEL carries 4 missiles (2 per target) SA-21 (S-400): Medium/long-range, up to 215nm Update of S-300 Other SAMs Systems Feature: Multirole capabilities and the capacity for integration with legacy IADS technologies; Suitability for the defense of fixed infrastructure targets and maneuver forces; Ability to integrate with naval surface combatants; The ability to exploit legacy missile rounds already in operational use; High operational mobility and deploy-ability; High lethality and jam resistance; 13

Naval Operations: Syria and the E. Mediterranean Transport and expeditionary operations: The Syrian Express resupply missions; Alligator and Ropucha Class landing ships also instrumental in Crimean occupation 14

Shipbuilding Challenges: 99 Problems Yasen (Severodvinsk) Class SSGN: Most advanced SSGN ever constructed by Russia 1 boats currently delivered Laid down in 1993 Cost: Just under $2 billion Yasen-M (Kazan) in sea trials (24 September - 9 October) Gorshkov Class Frigate: Multi-mission frigate Laid down in 2006 launched 2010, approx. 40% finished; commissioned August 2018 Multiple problems with gas turbines, integration of Poliment-Redut (first successful trial of entire system, Sept. 2018) 15

Shipbuilding Challenges: 99 Problems In 2010, SPTB Zvezdochka was given a contract for modernization of Kirov-class CGNs. Contract costs were severely inflated, and a third of the money allocated for modernization (100 million rubles) was embezzled by Konstantin Khryukin. In 2017, Khryukin was convicted of fraud and sentenced to 9 years in prison. Modernization of the first Kirov-class ship in dry dock, Pyotr Velikiy, scheduled for completion in 2018, will not be complete until at least 2021. 16

NATO Responses 17

Questions? 18