Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Similar documents
Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Wildland Fire Assistance

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

MCAS BEAUFORT SUSTAINABLE RANGES BRIEF MCAS BEAUFORT COMMUNITY PLANS AND LIAISON OFFICE (CP&L)

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

U.S. ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND

Report Documentation Page

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Acquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Report No. D May 14, Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

Information Technology

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

The Effects of Outsourcing on C2

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

AMCOM Corrosion Program

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Preliminary Observations on DOD Estimates of Contract Termination Liability

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

at the Missile Defense Agency

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

PEO Missiles and Space Overview Briefing for the 2010 Corrosion Summit February 2010 Huntsville, AL

Value and Innovation in Acquisition and Contracting

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Report No. DODIG December 5, TRICARE Managed Care Support Contractor Program Integrity Units Met Contract Requirements

USCG Aviation Corrosion Program ASETSDefense

Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract

Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association

Army Environmental Liability Recognition, Valuation, and Reporting June 2010

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

Report No. D-2011-RAM-004 November 29, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Projects--Georgia Army National Guard

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken


From the onset of the global war on

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

Defense Surplus Equipment Disposal: Background Information

Report No. D February 9, Internal Controls Over the United States Marine Corps Military Equipment Baseline Valuation Effort

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

2010 Fall/Winter 2011 Edition A army Space Journal

DODIG March 9, Defense Contract Management Agency's Investigation and Control of Nonconforming Materials

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

IMPROVING SPACE TRAINING

USMC Identity Operations Strategy. Major Frank Sanchez, USMC HQ PP&O

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. DoD Joint Services Weapon and Laser System Safety Review Processes

Report No. D August 12, Army Contracting Command-Redstone Arsenal's Management of Undefinitized Contractual Actions Could be Improved

Transcription:

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4715.13 November 15, 2005 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: DoD Noise Program References: (a) DoD Directive 5134.1, Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)), December 9, 2005 (b) DoD Directive 5124.2, Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R)), October 31, 1994 (c) DoD Instruction 4165.57, Air Installations Compatible Use Zones, November 8, 1977 (d) DoD Directive 5000.1, The Defense Acquisition System, May 12, 2003 (e) through (g), see enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE Under the authority of reference (a) and in conformance with reference (b), this Instruction establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for a coordinated DoD noise program. It also provides for establishment of a DoD Noise Working Group (DNWG). 2. APPLICABILITY This Instruction applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within the Department of Defense (hereafter referred to collectively as the DoD Components ). 3. DEFINITION Noise. For the purposes of this Instruction, noise is defined as unwanted sound generated from the operation of military weapons or weapons systems (e.g., aircraft, small arms, tank guns, artillery, missiles, bombs, rockets, mortars, and explosives) that affects either people, animals (domestic or wild), or structures on or in areas in proximity of a military installation; 1

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 15 NOV 2005 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE DoD Noise Program 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2005 to 00-00-2005 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Department of Defense,Washington,DC,20301-3400 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 5 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

occupational noise exposure and underwater sound associated with ship testing and training activities are specifically excluded from this definition. 4. POLICY The DoD noise program shall: 4.1. Reduce adverse effects from the noise associated with military test and training operations consistent with maintaining military readiness. 4.2. Consider the adverse effects of noise from military weapons or weapons systems on the ability to test, train, and operate weapons systems during the development of Initial Capabilities Documents, Capability Development Documents, Capability Production Documents and Capstone Requirements Documents and throughout the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System and associated acquisition processes. 4.3. Integrate, without degrading mission capabilities, noise management techniques and principles into installation, operational range, and operating area plans and programs and incorporate into Air Installation Compatible Use Zone and Joint Land Use Study program efforts (reference (c) and DoD Instruction 3030.3 (reference (g)). 4.4. Promote scientific research and the use of sound scientific methods and validated noise data as the basis for and the establishment of noise program guidance. 4.5. Promote the development of initiatives to educate and train DoD military, civilian and contractor personnel, and the public on noise issues. 4.6. Leverage resources to the maximum extent possible by ensuring the coordination of DoD noise program initiatives among the Department of Defense and other Federal Agencies. 4.7. Promote outreach with entities affected by noise generated from the operation of military weapons and weapons systems. 5. RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1. The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) shall: 5.1.1. Provide policy, guidance, oversight, and representation for the DoD noise program. 5.1.2. Establish noise policy and guidance that fully addresses military readiness considerations and ensures noise impacts are considered in the development, acquisition, and 2

fielding of weapons and weapons systems, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness and the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. 5.1.3. Review USD(AT&L) DoD Directives 4165.57 and 5000.1 (references (c) and (d)) and DoD Instruction 4715.9 (reference (e)), and supporting references for consistency, revision, and elimination of duplicative requirements. 5.2. The Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment (DUSD(I&E)), under the USD(AT&L), shall: 5.2.1. Develop and promulgate goals and objectives for the DoD noise program and establish metrics to evaluate progress toward meeting those goals and objectives. 5.2.2. Develop DoD noise program guidance and establish requirements and priorities for use in DoD Component planning, programming, and budgeting, in consultation with the DoD Components. 5.2.3. Consult with the Military Departments on their various installation compatible land use and noise management programs through the DNWG and the Range Sustainment Working Integrated Product Team process. 5.2.4. Establish, support, and provide guidance to a DNWG that includes representatives from the Military Departments. The DNWG shall: 5.2.4.1. Evaluate and advise the DUSD(I&E) and the DoD Components on noiserelated issues that have a bearing on the Department of Defense s ability to carry out its assigned mission requirements. 5.2.4.2. Coordinate and provide recommendations on technical and policy issues concerning noise associated with military testing and training activities and the impacts of such noise. 5.2.4.3. Represent DUSD(I&E) at meetings of the Federal Interagency Committee on Aviation Noise and maintain liaison with other Federal and State Agencies, nongovernmental organizations, professional organizations, educational institutions, and industries having similar interests or responsibilities. 5.3 The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall: 5.3.1. Coordinate on all policy and guidance issued by the USD(AT&L) regarding the DoD noise program to ensure the policy and guidance fully address military readiness considerations. 5.3.2. Review DoD Directive 3200.15 (reference (f)) and supporting issuances for consistency, revision, and elimination of duplicative requirements. 3

5.4 The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall coordinate on all policy and guidance issued by USD(AT&L) regarding the DoD noise program to ensure the policy and guidance fully consider impacts on testing and evaluation and the operations of the Major Range and Test Facility Base within the Department. 5.5. The Heads of the DoD Components shall: 5.5.1. Provide management support, resources, and professionally qualified staff sufficient to ensure effective implementation of the DoD noise program at all organizational levels. 5.5.2. Provide representatives to the DNWG. 5.5.3. Analyze current and future test and training needs to support effective planning, programming, budgeting, and execution of DoD noise program requirements. 5.6. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall ensure the impacts of noise emissions on the ability to train and operate are considered during the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System process. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE This Instruction is effective immediately. Enclosures - 1 E1. References, continued 4

E1. ENCLOSURE 1 REFERENCES, continued (e) DoD Instruction 4715.9, Environmental Planning and Analysis, May 3, 1996 (f) DoD Directive 3200.15, Sustainment of Ranges and Operating Areas (OPAREAs), January 10, 2003 (g) DoD Instruction 3030.3, Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) Program, July 13, 2004 5 ENCLOSURE 1