R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 48 Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification. February COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED. DATE February 2008 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E, N Budget Item Justification RDT&E / BA-5. COST ($ in Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL

N/JT CNTR RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELEC WAR (JCREW)

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification. June 2001 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA7

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RDT&E,N/ 07

COST (Dollars in Millions) FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Biometrics Enabled Intelligence FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Page 1 of 23. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-5

UNCLASSFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Tactical Data Links. FY 2011 OCO Estimate. FY 2011 Total Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

B. Program Change Summary: RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) FEBRUARY 2008 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : Counter Narcotics Technology Program Office

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Consolidated Afloat Network Ent Services(CANES) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

UNCLASSIFIED. COST ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #174

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification. February 2000 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA-4

UNCLASSIFIED. COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

UNCLASSIFIED DATE: February 2004

UNCLASSIFIED CLASSIFICATION: DATE May 2009 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION

UNCLASSIFIED CLASSIFICATION:

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Air Control

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #140

THE JOINT STAFF Fiscal Year (FY) 2008/2009 Budget Estimates Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

JOINT STAFF FY 2006/2007 Budget Estimates Submissions Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

R-2 Exhibit RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE FEBRUARY 1999 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E,DW/BA7

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

JOINT STAFF FY 2005 Budget Estimates Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

COST (Dollars in Millions) FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Program MDAP/MAIS Code: Project MDAP/MAIS Code(s): N42

1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Program MDAP/MAIS Code: 468

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Shopping List No EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2006

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #118

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : Physical Security Equipment

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #62

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #211

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #44

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Airborne Reconnaissance Advanced Development (ARAD)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #37

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

FY 2016 President's Budget February Electronics (NOTIONAL): N/A. RCS (Radio Communication System) Turnkey 216 M CANES 32 M

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #98

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2000

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #163

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001

Transcription:

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4 0603542N/Radiological Controls COST ($ in Millions) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Total PE Cost Project Unit S1830/RADIAC Development 1.009 1.055 1.112 0.959 0.970 0.982 0.999 1.016 RDT&E Articles Qty 505 555 5 5 Defense Emergency Response Funds (DERF) Funds: A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: Mission: The Radiation Detection, Indication and Computation (RADIAC) Program is responsible for providing radiation monitoring instruments that detect and measure radiation in accordance with the provisions of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10CFR). These instruments are used on all vessels afloat and at every shore installation in order to ensure the safety of personnel and the environment. RADIACs are also required after an act of terrorism or war that involves nuclear material in order to enable continuing warfighting ability. Justification: Many RADIAC instruments and dosimetry systems are decades old and approaching the end of their useful lives. In some cases the equipment and replacement parts are no longer manufactured, making the equipment logistically unsupportable. In other cases increasing failure rates due to age make replacements an economic efficiency improvement. In many cases a technology refresh will make both economic sense and provide increased operational capabilities. Multi-Function RADIAC (MFR): This instrument replaces 16 families of obsolescent equipment to provide increased capability at what will be significantly lower operating costs once the MFR Control Unit and its entire complement of probes have been developed. The Control Unit and one probe are currently being fielded, but in order to achieve the full design functionality of the MFR, several probes that will detect various other types of radiation (alpha, gamma, beta, neutron) must yet be developed. Naval Dosimetry System (NDS): The NDS, or personnel dosimetry system, is being developed to support routine operations and maintenance of Navy systems involving occupational exposure to radiation on nuclear ships, nuclear maintenance facilities, hospitals, weapons, and in other radiological environments. A new system is needed to replace the current CP-1112 and DT-526 system, which is approaching the end of its useful life due to increasing failure rates and the non-availablity of replacement parts. Despite ongoing restoration efforts to ensure availability of the current system, current projections are that the system will become unsupported by 2004. A Casualty Dosimetry System (CDS) is needed to support continuing Fleet operations after an act of terrorism or war involving nuclear materials. The current CDS that consists of the CP-95 Reader and DT- 60 Dosimeter is at the end of its useful life. The readers are no longer logistically supported and only cannibalization is available to restore non-operational units. Page 1 of 6

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME B. Accomplishments/Planned Program FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost 0.545 0.634 0.830 0.738 RDT&E Articles Quantity 5 5 5 5 Continue Multi-Function RADIAC (MFR) development and testing of prototype units for Frisker, Neutron, Radiography, Transuranic X-ray and Universal Probes, and for software development to enable multiple automated calibration of MFR components. Articles are prototypes for evaluation. FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost 0.200 0.224 0.282 0.221 RDT&E Articles Quantity 0 50 0 0 Continue development of a personnel dosimetry system for the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program. Articles are prototypes for evaluation. FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost 0.264 0.197 RDT&E Articles Quantity 500 500 Continue development of a Casualty Dosimetry System. Articles are prototypes for evaluation. Page 2 of 6

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME C. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY: Funding: FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY2003 President's Budget: 1.056 1.078 1.158 0.999 FY2004 President's Budget: 1.009 1.055 1.112 0.959 Total Adjustments -0.047-0.023-0.046-0.040 Summary of Adjustments Management Reform Initiative -0.009 FY 2002 SBIR -0.007 Section 313, PL 107-206: Revised -0.002 NWCF Rates - SPAWAR -0.001 0.001 FY 02 BTR (July 02) -0.021 Business Process Reform -0.004 Economic Assumptions -0.003-0.006 IT Cost Growth -0.002 Miscellaneous adjustments -0.019-0.021 NWCF Rates - R&D Fuel 0.001 Inflation adjustment -0.011-0.026-0.021 Subtotal -0.042-0.023-0.046-0.040 Schedule: Additional development is required on the Casualty Dosimetry System and the Multi-Function RADIACb(MFR) Frisker Probe based on the initial prototype evaluation. Resultant change shifts development efforts on other MFR probes out to FY 03 start. Technical: The scope of development of the Naval Dosimetry System has been expanded to include evaluation of a secondary personnel dosimetry system for shipboard use. Page 3 of 6

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME D. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: To Total Line Item No. & Name FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Complete Cost OPN BLI 292000 RADIAC 7.707 7.847 8.600 8.287 8.593 8.767 8.928 9.089 CONT. CONT. E. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: * Development efforts are being focused on evaluation, modification (as required to meet operational requirements) and adaptation of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) technology in order to minimize total ownership costs. To the maximum extent possible new contracts are targeted for fixed price efforts to control development cost. F. MAJOR PERFORMERS: ** SPAWARSYSCEN Charleston. Technical Direction Agent and In-Service Engineering Assistance. NSWC Carderock. Science & Technology Agent. Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). Multi-Function RADIAC Probe development. Award estimated May 2003. JP Laboratories, Inc. Development of Casualty Dosimetry System. Award estimated April 2003. * Not required for Budget Activities 1,2,3, and 6 ** Required for DON and OSD submit only. Page 4 of 6

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 Method Activity & PY s FY 03 Award FY 04 Award FY 05 Award Cost to Total Target Value & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract Primary Hardware Development C/FP Various 9.000 0.506 05/03 0.553 03/04 0.390 03/05 10.449 Ancillary Hardware Development 0.000 Component Development 0.000 Ship Integration 0.000 Ship Suitability 0.000 Systems Engineering WX SPAWARSYSCEN Chasn. 1.100 1.100 Training Development 0.000 Licenses 0.000 Tooling 0.000 GFE 0.000 Award Fees 0.000 Subtotal Product Development 10.100 0.506 0.553 0.390 0.000 11.549 Development Support WX NSWC Carderock 1.120 0.280 04/03 0.285 10/03 0.290 10/04 1.975 Software Development 0.000 Training Development 0.000 Integrated Logistics Support 0.000 Configuration Management 0.000 Technical Data 0.000 GFE 0.000 Award Fees 0.000 Subtotal Support 1.120 0.280 0.285 0.290 0.000 1.975 Page 5 of 6

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 Method Activity & PY s FY 03 Award FY 04 Award FY 05 Award Cost to Total Target Value & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract Developmental Test & Evaluation WX SPAWARSYSCEN Chasn. 4.056 0.148 05/03 0.151 10/03 0.154 10/04 4.509 Operational Test & Evaluation WX Various 0.329 0.329 Live Fire Test & Evaluation 0.000 Test Assets 0.000 Tooling 0.000 GFE 0.000 Award Fees 0.000 Subtotal T&E 4.385 0.148 0.151 0.154 0.000 4.838 Contractor Engineering Support 0.000 Government Engineering Support WX SPAWARSYSCEN Chasn. 5.045 5.045 Program Management Support WX SPAWARSYSCEN Chasn. 5.046 0.111 10/02 0.113 10/03 0.115 10/04 5.385 Travel 0.305 0.010 10/02 0.010 10/03 0.010 10/04 0.335 Labor (Research Personnel) 0.000 SBIR Assessment 0.000 Subtotal Management 10.396 0.121 0.123 0.125 0.000 10.765 Total Cost 26.001 1.055 1.112 0.959 0.000 29.127 Page 6 of 6