Armaments, Disarmament and International Security

Similar documents
Nuclear Disarmament Weapons Stockpiles

Nuclear Disarmament: Weapons Stockpiles

V. Chinese nuclear forces

A rational approach to Britain s future nuclear arsenal

OHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence

Beyond Trident: A Civil Society Perspective on WMD Proliferation

What is the current status of Trident replacement in the UK?

Arms Control and Proliferation Profile: The United Kingdom

Ladies and gentlemen, it is a pleasure to once again six years for me now to

VII. Pakistani nuclear forces

US Nuclear Policy: A Mixed Message

Trends in World Nuclear Forces, 2016

REPLACING TRIDENT BACKGROUND BRIEFING FOR PARLIAMENTARIANS DR. NICK RITCHIE BRADFORD DISARMAMENT RESEARCH CENTRE JANUARY 2011

Nuclear dependency. John Ainslie

Fact Sheet, 1 Oct. 2014, <

Reducing the waste in nuclear weapons modernization

U.S. Nuclear Policy and World Nuclear Situation

EXPERT EVIDENCE REPORT

UNIDIR RESOURCES IDEAS FOR PEACE AND SECURITY. Practical Steps towards Transparency of Nuclear Arsenals January Introduction

Nuclear Weapons Status and Options Under a START Follow-On Agreement

Setting Priorities for Nuclear Modernization. By Lawrence J. Korb and Adam Mount February

SEEKING A RESPONSIVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS INFRASTRUCTURE AND STOCKPILE TRANSFORMATION. John R. Harvey National Nuclear Security Administration

The United Kingdom s Independent Strategic Nuclear Deterrent Observations on the 2006 White Paper and Issues for the Parliamentary Debate

COLUMBIA Class Submarine Program

October 2017 SWIM CALL

4 Aug 92. Encl: From: Commanding Officer, USS MICHIGAN (SSBN 727) To: Director of Naval History (0-09BH), Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20374

Triad, Dyad, Monad? Shaping U.S. Nuclear Forces for the Future. Presentation to the Air Force Association Mitchell Institute for Airpower Studies

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

STEPPING DOWN THE NUCLEAR LADDER:

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

What if the Obama Administration Changes US Nuclear Policy? Potential Effects on the Strategic Nuclear War Plan

VI. Indian nuclear forces

The Future of the. British Nuclear Deterrent 3 NOVEMBER 2006

Modernization of US Nuclear Forces: Costs in Perspective

Trafalgar Night Speech Royal Navy Club October 10, 2013

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

Défense nationale, July US National Security Strategy and pre-emption. Hans M. KRISTENSEN

Secrecy and dependence: The UK Trident system in the 21st century

The Determinants of Nuclear Force Structure

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

Policy Responses to Nuclear Threats: Nuclear Posturing After the Cold War

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

5720 Ser056. (3 ) Narrative (4) USS MICHIGAN History (5) Ship's Picture (6) Commanding Officer's Biography and picture. 5 Mar 96

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

The Defence Nuclear Enterprise: a landscape review

Though the size of the US nuclear. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. US nuclear forces, Hans M. Kristensen and Robert S.

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

The Need for a Strong U.S. Nuclear Deterrent In the 21 st Century. A White Paper By Franklin C. Miller

Navy Ohio Replacement (SSBN[X]) Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress

The United Kingdom and Nuclear Weapons

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 7 USS MICHIGAN (SSBN 727) / FW AP

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

Navy SSBN(X) Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress

This consultation paper is presented as the first stage. in the development of new Party policy in relation to

NATO's Nuclear Forces in the New Security Environment

Differences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

Physics/Global Studies 280: Session 17

Conventional Prompt Global Strike and Long-Range Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues

Issue Briefs. NNSA's '3+2' Nuclear Warhead Plan Does Not Add Up

The U.S. Nuclear Posture in Korea

Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

Navy Trident Submarine Conversion (SSGN) Program: Background and Issues for Congress

U.S. Nuclear Planning After the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review

Issue Briefs. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More Published on Arms Control Association (

NRDC: Nuclear Notebook U.S. nuclear forces, 2006

NIS technical briefing note

Development of Russian Armed Forces in the Vicinity of Japan. Ministry of Defense, GOJ

1. Enclosures (1) throuqh (6) are forwarded, per reference (a). ad hkil

The U.S. Sea Based Strategic Force: Costs of the Trident Submarine and Missile Programs and Alternatives

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, DC

CRS Report for Con. The Bush Administration's Proposal For ICBM Modernization, SDI, and the B-2 Bomber

North Korea's Nuclear Programme and Ballistic Missile Capabilities: An Assessment

Armaments, Disarmament and International Security

[This is a rush, unofficial transcript provided by National Security Reports.]

Verifying Nuclear Disarmament

II. Arms transfers and tensions in North East Asia

OPNAVINST G N514 8 Jan Subj: RELEASE OF INFORMATION ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND ON NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES OF U.S. NAVY FORCES

Navy SSBN(X) Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Policy: Defence. Policy. Use of The Military. / PO Box 773, DICKSON ACT 2602

ASSESSMENT OF THE SAFETY OF US NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND RELATED NUCLEAR TEST REQUIREMENTS

Navy Ohio Replacement (SSBN[X]) Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Navy Columbia Class (Ohio Replacement) Ballistic Missile Submarine (SSBN[X]) Program: Background and Issues for Congress

U.S. nuclear forces, 2008

SECTION 4 IRAQ S WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

Navy Columbia Class (Ohio Replacement) Ballistic Missile Submarine (SSBN[X]) Program: Background and Issues for Congress

NMMSS, Nuclear Archaeology, and the Verification of Nuclear Disarmament

Navy Columbia Class (Ohio Replacement) Ballistic Missile Submarine (SSBN[X]) Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Presentation at the Wars, military and climate conference, part of the People s Climate

Role and Modernization Trends of China s Second Artillery

Navy Ohio Replacement (SSBN[X]) Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Perspectives on the 2013 Budget Request and President Obama s Guidance on the Future of the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program

Nuclear Forces: Restore the Primacy of Deterrence

DEFENCE NUCLEAR PROGRAMME RISK REGISTER

FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK

The Royal Navy and its equipment support

Transcription:

SIPRI YEARBOOK 2013 Armaments, Disarmament and International Security British nuclear forces

STOCKHOLM INTERNATIONAL PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE British nuclear forces Contents Table 6.4. British nuclear forces, January 2013 301 This is an offprint of section III of chapter 6 of SIPRI Yearbook 2013: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security Oxford University Press, 2013, ISBN 978 0 19 967843 3, hardback, xxii+574 pp., 100/$185 The SIPRI Yearbook is published and distributed in print and online by Oxford University Press more information is available at <http://www.sipriyearbook.org> 1 www.sipriyearbook.org

300 MILITARY SPENDING AND ARMAMENTS, 2012 III. British nuclear forces The United Kingdom s nuclear deterrent consists exclusively of a sea-based component: Vanguard class Trident nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) armed with Trident II (designated D5) submarinelaunched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) and associated warheads, and their support infrastructure. The UK possesses an arsenal of about 160 operational nuclear warheads that are available for use by a fleet of four Trident SSBNs based at Faslane, Scotland (see table 6.4). The UK leases 58 Trident II (D5) SLBMs from the United States Navy under a system of mingled asset ownership. Each Vanguard class SSBN is equipped with 16 Trident II missiles carrying up to 48 warheads. The warhead is similar to the US W76 warhead; it has been upgraded with the US-produced arming, fusing and firing system for the Trident II s Mk-4A re-entry vehicle, which improves the accuracy of the missile and increases its ability to destroy hardened targets. 1 While each Trident II missile can carry three warheads, it is believed that a number of them are deployed with only one warhead, possibly with a reduced explosive yield. This reflects a decision by the British Ministry of Defence (MOD) in 1998 to give a sub-strategic, or limitedstrike, role to the Trident fleet, with the intention of enhancing the flexibility of nuclear targeting options specifically, an option for a limited strike that would not automatically lead to a full scale nuclear exchange. 2 An addendum in 2002 extended the role of nuclear weapons to include deterring leaders of states of concern and terrorist organisations. 3 In a posture known as Continuous At-Sea Deterrence (CASD), one British SSBN is on patrol at all times. 4 While the second and third SSBNs can be put to sea rapidly, the fourth would take longer because of its cycle of extensive overhaul and maintenance. Since the end of the cold war, the SSBN on patrol has been kept at a level of reduced readiness with its missiles de-targeted and a notice to fire measured in days. 5 1 According to some reports, the UK is procuring the US-produced W76-1 warhead for its Trident missiles. Kristensen, H. M., British submarines to receive upgraded US nuclear warhead, Strategic Security Blog, Federation of American Scientists, 1 Apr. 2011, <http://blogs.fas.org/security/2011/04/ britishw76-1/>. 2 British Ministry of Defence, The Strategic Defence Review: Modern Forces for the Modern World, Cm 3999 (The Stationery Office: London, July 1998), para. 63. 3 British Ministry of Defence, The Strategic Defence Review: A New Chapter, Cm 5566, vol. 1 (Stationery Office: London, July 2002), para. 21. 4 British Ministry of Defence and British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, The Future of the United Kingdom s Nuclear Deterrent, Cm 6994 (Stationery Office: London, Dec. 2006), p. 27. 5 British Ministry of Defence and British Foreign and Commonwealth Office (note 4), p. 13.

WORLD NUCLEAR FORCES 301 Table 6.4. British nuclear forces, January 2013 No. Year first Range Warheads Warheads Type Designation deployed deployed (km) a x yield in stockpile Submarine-launched ballistic missiles D5 Trident II 48 1994 >7 400 1 3 x 100 kilotons 225 b a Range is for illustrative purposes only; actual mission range will vary according to flight profile and weapon loading. b Fewer than 160 warheads are operationally available, c. 144 to arm 48 missiles on 3 of 4 nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs). Only 1 SSBN is on patrol at any time, with up to 48 warheads. Sources: British Ministry of Defence, white papers, press releases and website, <https://www. gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-defence>; British House of Commons, Hansard, various issues; Norris, R. S. et al., Nuclear Weapons Databook, vol. 5, British, French, and Chinese Nuclear Weapons (Westview: Boulder, CO, 1994), p. 9; Nuclear notebook, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, various issues; and authors estimates. On 23 October 2012 the submarine HMS Vigilant successfully test-fired a Trident II SLBM in the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Florida. The test was part of a demonstration and shakedown operation (DASO) for HMS Vigilant s return to service following a three-year mid-life overhaul and reactor refuelling period. It was the British Royal Navy s first flight test of a Trident missile since 2009 and its 10th overall. 6 In the 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) the British Government made a commitment to retain a continuous submarine-based nuclear deterrent force for the indefinite future. 7 The MOD currently plans to replace the four Vanguard class SSBNs, which will reach the end of their service lives from 2024, with new submarines equipped with modified Trident II (D5) SLBMs at an estimated initial cost of 20 billion ($37 billion) at 2006 prices. 8 As a cost-saving measure they will have a smaller missile compartment equipped with 8 launch tubes carrying no more than 40 warheads. 9 The SDSR deferred the main gate decision on when the detailed acquisition plans, design and number of the successor submarines are to be finalized until 2016. In 2011 the MOD announced the completion of the initial gate phase setting out the broad design parameters for the new SSBN class. 10 In June 2012 it awarded a 1 billion ($1.6 billion) contract for 6 British House of Commons, Written Answers to Questions, Hansard, 19 Nov. 2012, Column 238W; and Royal Navy conducts test firing of Trident missile, Nuclear Information Service, 3 Nov. 2012, <http://www.nuclearinfo.org/article/uk-trident/royal-navy-conducts-test-firing-trident-missile>. 7 British Ministry of Defence, Securing Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The Strategic Defence and Security Review, Cm 7948 (Stationery Office: London, Oct. 2010), paras 3.8 3.9. 8 British Ministry of Defence (note 7), para. 3.10. 9 British Ministry of Defence (note 7), paras 3.11 3.12, 3.14. 10 British Ministry of Defence (MOD), The United Kingdom s Future Nuclear Deterrent: The Submarine Initial Gate Parliamentary Report (MOD: London, May 2011), p. 4.

302 MILITARY SPENDING AND ARMAMENTS, 2012 refurbishing the plant that will build nuclear reactors for the next generation of attack and ballistic missile submarines. 11 The cost of the proposed plan to replace the existing Trident fleet with a like for like system has drawn criticism from the Liberal Democrat party, the smaller of the two parties in the current governing coalition. As part of its coalition deal with the Conservative party in 2010, it demanded a formal review of credible and compelling nuclear deterrence alternatives. 12 Potential alternatives under consideration include acquiring nuclear cruise missiles or a multi-role submarine, or abandoning the CASD posture. 13 While the report of the Trident Alternatives Review is due in June 2013, critics have pointed out that it will be difficult to halt the successor submarine replacement programme given the amount of investment already made. 14 If the programme is given final approval, the new submarine is expected to enter service beginning in 2028. The 2010 SDR revealed plans for cutting the size of the British nuclear arsenal. The stockpile of operational nuclear warheads will be reduced from fewer than 160 at present to no more than 120, of which 40 will be on patrol at any given time. Likewise, the overall size of the nuclear stockpile, including non-deployed weapons, will decrease from the current 225 warheads to not more than 180 by the mid 2020s. 15 11 Watts, N., Coalition faces split over Trident nuclear replacement, The Guardian, 17 June 2012. 12 Hopkins, N., Trident: no need for like-for-like replacement, says Danny Alexander, The Guardian, 23 Jan. 2013. 13 Lehrke, D. L., Deterrent dilemma: UK examines its nuclear options, Jane s Intelligence Review, Aug. 2012, pp. 49 53. 14 Minister Danny Alexander dismisses Trident replacement, BBC News, 23 Jan. 2013, <http:// www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21155000>; and Hopkins, N. and Norton-Taylor, R., New Trident nukes seem certain despite Lib Dem concerns, Guardian Defence and Security Blog, 22 June 2012, <http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/defence-and-security-blog/2012/jun/22/trident-nuclear-weapons>. 15 British Ministry of Defence (note 7), para. 3.11.