EVALUATION OF AVAILABILITY OF REGIONAL PASSENGER TRANSPORT SERVICE IN JELGAVA DISTRICT

Similar documents
FACTORS INFLUENCING E-COMMERCE DEVELOPMENT IN BALTIC RURAL AREAS

COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR THE TRANSNATIONAL LEADER PROJECT Sustainable entrepreneurship in countryside

D6.9 Report twinning activities

GUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION FOR LICENCE UNDER THE ICT LICENSING FRAMEWORK OF Botswana Communications Regulatory Authority

National Armed Forces Law

Comparative Analysis of the Career Guidance Needs in the Baltic Countries

LEADER helping rural territories to help themselves

Annual Report on the Implementation of the Swiss Latvian Cooperation Programme in Latvia April 2015 March 2016

Year 2000 Commissioned by the Soros Foundation Latvia

Nigerian Communication Commission

HEARTLAND RURAL MOBILITY PLAN (HRMP)

Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers regulating implementation of the measure of specific support objective

Sealine - Hyannis to Woods Hole WINTER/SPRING 2018

Municipal Stream. Community Transportation Grant Program. Application Guidelines and Requirements Issued: December 2017

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By the Bureau of Public Transportation JULY 2013 PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AUDIT REQUIREMENTS

Community Transportation Pilot Grant Program Application Guidelines and Requirements

Improving the accessibility of employment and training opportunities for rural young unemployed

Central and East European Market for IT Outsourcing: Advantages and Impediments. Valdis Lokenbahs, President, DATI

Passenger transport in isolated urban communities supplementary note

Report by Finance and Administration Committee (A) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Gold Rush Circulator Study Charlotte, North Carolina REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

A European workforce for call centre services. Construction industry recruits abroad

Developing Plans for the Better Care Fund

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 140 ( 2014 ) PSYSOC 2013

Greater Cambridge Partnership Executive Board. Chris Tunstall Interim Transport Director. Western Orbital

Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) Country Report Latvia

Comprehensive Plan 2009

LEADER approach today and after 2013 new challenges

(unofficial translation)

TRANSPORTATION. Roles and Responsibilities

Proposal For Nye County (Pahrump) Public Transportation (Transit) System 2015

Request for Information No Private Transportation Provider Pilot Program to Ontario Airport

TG on Occupational Safety and Health 3rd Meeting (jointly with the NCD EG) Helsinki, Finland May 2012

The Baltic Naval Squadron BALTRON

Transportation Demand Management (TDM)

Edith Cowan University

Involving the private sector in Mobility Management

Agenda. 6:00 p.m. - 6:45 p.m. - Registration & Open House. 6:45 p.m. - 6:55 p.m. - Welcome & Opening Remarks

SouthEastern Arizona Governments Organization Cochise County Intercity Bus Feasibility Study. February 3-4, 2017

From April 2017 NHS Kernow aims to have in place a new NHS funded transport policy which will clearly outline:

Appendix H Illinois DOT: Inventory of Services

Country Profile: Latvia

NATO Force Integration Unit LATVIA NATO HQ for NATO s new challenges, providing security for business growth and investments

IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Standard Operating Procedures Manual SOPs External Relation Travel Management Presented to: Independent Elections Commission (IEC) Funded and

FORMULA GRANTS 5307 Urbanized Area 5337 State of Good Repair 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities Board of Directors Committee Meeting

Title VI: Public Participation Plan

The preparation and integration of Turkey s National Disaster Response Plan

MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Executive Summary

Guidelines. STEP travel grants. steptravelgrants.eu

SMART CITY NELSON MANDELA BAY STARTING SMALL IN A BIG WAY

The Welsh NHS Confederation s response to the inquiry into cross-border health arrangements between England and Wales.

Investigation of Changes in Library Usage after the Introduction of Outsourcing in Japan

AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

mobility plus application package SECTION A: For completion by applicant

Ontario Indigenous Travel Grant

October 13th, Foreword

Federal Transit Administration: Section Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities. Call for Projects.

Strategic Transportation Infrastructure Program

Last Name: First Name: Initial: Street Address: City/State/Zip: Main Phone: Alternate Phone: Date of Birth (month/day/year): Name: Relationship:

Please refer to the page(s) as listed below for the contact number of the Community Transport operator(s) serving each respective parish listed:

LEADER in Mozambique. Exchange Workshop EC - World Bank Petri Rinne, ELARD

BROWARD COUNTY TRANSIT MAJOR SERVICE CHANGE TO 595 EXPRESS SUNRISE - FORT LAUDERDALE. A Title VI Service Equity Analysis

BSR INTERREG III B Progress Report Activity Report (general information)

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/PROPOSALS SUBASE NEW LONDON JOINT LAND USE STUDY (JLUS) IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

279/1992 Coll. The Czech National Council has resolved to pass the following Act: Section 1

TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH PROTOCOL FIT APPLICATIONS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY

PPIAF Assistance in Nepal

Bus Travel Assistance Safety-Net Application cont... 4 Names of students applying for bus travel assistance IMPORTANT: Student details must match reco

MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA. The State Defence Concept

LITHUANIA. I. Army. Area... 6,000 sq. km. Population (XII. I932).. 2,422,000 Density per sq. km Length of railway system (193)... 1,566 km.

Preliminary Inventory of the Latviesu Centrala Komiteja records. No online items

SCSPC STAFF REPORT. Peak Hour Rail Service Update. MEETING DATE: February 14, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 5 RECOMMENDATION:

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Transportation and the Federal Government

COMMUNITY FUNDING POLICY

RAZORBACK TRANSIT University of Arkansas 131 ADSB 155 Razorback Rd. Fayetteville, AR Phone: (479) Fax: (479)

Seminar on Standardization of NGN and ICT Services Development 5-77 July 2005 Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Special Education Data Reporting Overview. Cost Based Reimbursement Methodology for School-Based Health Services

FOND DU LAC COUNTY LIBRARY SERVICE PLAN

Primary Care Workforce Survey 2013

21-26 of October 2012: Co-Cities demonstrations at the 19th ITS World Congress in Vienna Validate mobility services with Co-Cities

NCHRP Tasks 20 and 25: Analysis of Rural Intercity Bus Strategy

LATVIAN ARMED FORCES: GROUND FORCES STRATEGY TRANSFORMATION

Ministry of Defence and New Zealand Defence Force: Further report on the acquisition and introduction into service of Light Armoured Vehicles

Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference ECONOMIC SCIENCE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT No 41

THE RESEARCH COUNCIL OF LITHUANIA:

REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON NATIONAL CONSCRIPTION. 22 October 1996 No. I-1593 Vilnius (as amended by 17 July 2000 No. VIII-1863)

Request for Proposals. For NEW HOPE TO WARMINSTER PASSENGER RAIL SHUTTLE FEASIBILITY STUDY

Surplus Vehicle Donation Program

CLLD/LEADER and Cooperation. Dr Maura Farrell NUIG/NRN

Master Development Plan Written Report

National Transport Development Policy Committee (NTDPC)

Guidelines for Applicants and Beneficiaries

Provider Service Expectations Transportation Services SPC 107 Provider Subcontract Agreement Appendix N

Common Challenges Shared Solutions

Effective June 25, New York City Transit. Subway Timetable. New: Weekend Route Change

"Positive and negative tendencies in development the market model of primary medical care in Ukraine".

KEA AU (HIGHWAY 130) IMPROVEMENTS. Project No. STP-0130 (27) Public Informational Meeting Kea au au Community Center April 17, 2008

Research Funding System in Latvia: Request for Specific Support

Transcription:

EVALUATION OF AVAILABILITY OF REGIONAL PASSENGER TRANSPORT SERVICE IN JELGAVA DISTRICT Janis Mistris, Gints Birzietis Latvia University of Agriculture janis.mistris@llu.lv, gints.birzietis@llu.lv Abstract. The aim of many regional governments is to develop an effective regional passenger traffic system. In order that the system could successfully operate, it is important to develop a route network which would provide the transport service for the majority of people who live in the region. The regional public passenger transport routes should provide certain functions which are determined by the Law on Public Transport Services (2007). The aim of this research is to evaluate the existing regional passenger route network in Jelgava district according to the requirements set in this Law. The study is based on information about configuration and location of the existing regional passenger route network in the region and bus running time and frequency in each route. Keywords: public passenger transport, low density areas, accessibility. Introduction Regular passenger transport services in the Republic of Latvia are regulated by the Law on Public Transport Services (2007) and related Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers (RCM) (Fig. 1). Law on Public Transport Services RCM No. 634 of 13 July 2010 Procedure of Organising Public Transport Services in a Network of Routes RCM No. 1614 of 22 December 2009 Regulations regarding Distributing Government Budget Funding for the Planning Regions to Provide Public Transport Services on Regional Local Routes RCM No. 1226 of 26 October 2009 Procedures of Compensating Losses and Expenses Caused by Providing Public Transport Services and Setting Tariffs of Public Transportation RCM No. 872 of 4 August 2009 Regulations regarding Passenger Categories Entitled to Reduced Fares on Network Routes RCM No. 843 of 11 December 2007 Procedure of Providing and Using Public Transport Services RCM No. 676 of 2 October 2007 Procedure of Establishing and Maintaining a Single System of Selling, Reserving and Recording Public Transport Tickets Fig. 1. Latvian legal framework for public transport services The Law stipulates the way of organising regular public passenger transport services in the Republic of Latvia. The Law states that regular passenger transport services in the Republic of Latvia are organised on the following routes: regional local routes the routes that provide passenger movement within the administrative territory of one municipality and from this municipality to the closest neighbouring territories or to another municipality within a planning region; 382

regional intercity routes the routes that provide passenger movement within the country mainly from one administrative territory to an administrative territory in another planning region or those connecting republican cities; city routes the routes that provide passenger movement within the administrative borders of a republican city as well as from this city to the closest neighbouring territories [1]. The Law states that a network of routes has to be designed to satisfy the demand of residents for public transport services and ensure a possibility in the network of routes to visit educational institutions, medical institutions, work places, national and local government institutions during their normal (general) business hours. While designing a network of routes for outside city borders, first of all, a possibility for school children to attend their educational institutions is ensured. Materials and methods The accordance of the network of regional local public transport routes in Jelgava municipality with the Law on Public Transport Services was analysed in the present research. Regional local passenger transport routes are designed to provide: public transport connections among neighbouring municipalities; reaching the parish or town administration in any municipality; public transport interconnections among neighbouring towns within a planning region; public transport connections between municipalities and the closest city within a planning region. Regional local public transport routes in a municipality have to meet the mentioned requirements. Fig. 2 presents an idealized model of these requirements. Fig. 2. Model for regional local passenger transport routes The Law stipulates that regional local passenger transport routes have to ensure that neighbouring municipalities are interconnected. This requirement may be met in the following ways: public transport connections are provided between neighbouring municipality centres; public transport connections are provided among settlements, which are not municipality centres, in neighbouring municipalities; public transport connections are provided between a populated place (village, town) in a municipality, which is not a municipality centre, and the centre of a neighbouring municipality (Fig. 2). Results and discussion Jelgava municipality is located in the central part of Latvia. In the south, its border is also the country s border with the Republic of Lithuania. In accordance with the Law on Public Transport Services, regional local routes have to ensure that neighbouring municipalities, which are located within one planning region, may be reached. Five planning regions were established in Latvia: Kurzeme planning region; Zemgale planning region; Latgale planning region; 383

Vidzeme planning region; Rīga planning region [2]. Jelgava municipality is included in Zemgale planning region and borders on the municipalities of Tērvete, Dobele, Ozolnieki, and Rundāle which also are included in Zemgale planning region. In the north, the municipality borders on Rīga planning region. In accordance with the Law on Administrative Territories and Populated Areas, the territorial division of a municipality includes municipality towns and municipality rural territories. Jelgava municipality includes the following municipality rural territories that have obtained the status of territorial unit of municipality after the regional reform: Eleja, Glūda, Jaunsvirlauka, Kalnciems, Lielplatone, Līvbērze, Platone, Sesava, Svēte, Valgunde, Vilce, Vircava, and Zaļenieki. According to Fig.2, regional local passenger transport routes in Jelgava municipality have to provide transport connections between the mentioned municipality rural territories and their municipality centre. However, transport connections have to be provided to neighbouring municipality centres that are included in Zemgale planning region. These neighbouring municipality centres are: Dobele, Tērvete, Ozolnieki, and Pilsrundāle. A transport connection to Dobele is provided on weekdays beginning at 7.00 a.m. when the first bus trip departs until 10.40 p.m., but on weekends from 7.47 a.m. to 10.40 p.m. (Fig. 3). Fig. 3. Number of bus trips to the centre of neighbouring municipalities [3] On average, there are two bus trips an hour towards Dobele during the mentioned period. The majority of these bus trips are provided from Rīga in transit through Jelgava, and their final destinations are Dobele, Saldus, or Liepāja. During some hours, there are three bus trips an hour towards Dobele. A transport connection to Tērvete is provided by five bus trips a day. The first bus trip departs at 7.40 a.m. and the last one at 6.50 p.m. There are four bus trips a day to Pilsrundāle, which provide public transportation beginning at 7.00 a.m. until 3.20 p.m. A transport connection to Ozolnieki is provided within the network of Jelgava city public transport routes. On average, three bus trips an hour are available to Ozolnieki in the period from 5.00 a.m. to 8.00 p.m. Trains also provide a transport connection to Ozolnieki, which run on the regional intercity route Rīga Jelgava Rīga. Train trips are provided on average once an hour. It is found out in the present research that all regional local public transport routes in Jelgava municipality make a direct connection to the municipality centre. A public transport system of several levels is not established in Jelgava municipality, in which the public transport routes serve territorial 384

units of municipalities, i.e. make connections to their largest populated places, which, in their turn, would be connected to certain routes that make a direct connection to the municipality centre. The size of populated places, in terms of the number of residents, in Jelgava municipality are different. Depending on the number of residents and the available infrastructure there, the populated places are classified into 15 development centres. It is determined that four populated places make up local development centres: Eleja, Kalnciems, Nākotne, and Staļģene, while 11 populated places make up first-level development centres: Valgunde, Līvbērze, Svēte, Mežciems, Vircava, Platone, Zaļenieki, Vilce, Lielplatone, Sesava, and Bērvircava. Table 1 presents summarised information on bus trips from the municipality centre to the firstlevel development centres. As one can see, the numbers of bus trips to these populated places are not evenly distributed. There is an even distribution of bus trips to Platone, Līvberze, Svēte, and Zaļenieki all day long, while a public transport connection to other populated places is provided only within certain hours. A transport connection to Mežciems is provided within the network of Jelgava city public transport routes Table 1 Number of bus trips to the first-level development centres [4] Route Operating time Jelgava Lielplatone Jelgava Līvbērze Jelgava Platone Jelgava Sesava Jelgava Svēte 5:00 1 1 1 1 6:00 1 2 2 1 4 7:00 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 8:00 1 1 1 4 1 9:00 1 1 1 2 10:00 1 1 1 1 1 2 11:00 1 1 1 2 12:00 1 1 1 2 1 13:00 1 1 2 14:00 1 1 3 1 1 2 15:00 1 1 1 1 3 1 16:00 1 1 1 1 17:00 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 18:00 1 1 1 1 1 1 19:00 1 1 1 1 3 20:00 1 1 2 Total 3 11 15 4 14 6 4 4 13 32 5 Table 2 includes summarised information on bus trips from the first-level developmnet centres to the municipality centre. As one can see in Table 2, in this direction a similar trend as in the opposite direction is observed as well. Only two bus trips a day are available from Lielplatone to the municipality centre, whereas the numbers of bus trips are on average five times greater for such populated places as Līvbērze, Platone, Svēte, and Zaļenieki. Jelgava Valgunde Jelgava Vilce Jelgava Vircava Jelgava Zaļenieki Jelgava Mežciems Jelgava Bērvircava 385

Number of bus trips from the first-level development centres [4] Table 2 Route Operating time Lielplatone Jelgava Līvbērze Jelgava Platone Jelgava Sesava Jelgava Svēte Jelgava Valgunde Jelgava Vilce Jelgava Vircava Jelgava Zaļenieki Jelgava Mežciems Jelgava Bērvircava Jelgava 6:00 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 7:00 1 1 2 4 1 8:00 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 9:00 1 1 1 1 10:00 1 1 2 11:00 1 1 1 2 1 12:00 1 1 1 2 2 13:00 2 14:00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15:00 1 1 2 1 2 2 16:00 1 1 1 1 17:00 1 1 1 1 2 18:00 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 19:00 1 2 2 3 20:00 1 1 21:00 1 1 Total 2 8 10 5 13 5 5 5 11 31 6 Fig. 4 presents the number of bus trips to and from the local development centres during the period of one day. As one can see in Fig.4, the distribution of bus trips to these populated places is not even. A number of bus trips are mainly determined by the geographical situation of a populated place. Through Eleja and Nākotne, a large number of bus trips are available on regional intercity routes, which ensure passenger transportation among all the populated places on this route. Saļģene - Jelgava Jelgava - Staļģene Nākotne - Jelgava Jelgava - Nākotne Kalnciems - Jelgava Jelgava - Kalnciems Eleja - Jelgava Jelgava - Eleja 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Fig. 4. Number of bus rides to and from the local development centres [4] In the direction of the bus trips from the local development centres to the municipality centre in Jelgava municipality, a similar trend as in the opposite direction is also observed. The bus trips from Staļģene and Kalnciems are provided 5 times a day, 8 from Eleja, and 15 times a day from Nākotne. Conclusions 1. Regional local passenger transport services in Jelgava municipality are provided by busses. 386

2. A transport connection between Jelgava municipality and its neighbouring municipalities, which are included in one planning region, is ensured and meets the requirements of the Law on Public Transport Services. 3. The regional local passenger transport routes in Jelgava municipality are radially-shaped relative to the municipality centre. 4. All the populated places in Jelgava municipality are included in the regional local passenger transport routes. 5. The numbers of bus trips between the populated places in Jelgava municipality differ very much. It is mainly determined by the geographical situation of a populated place. References 1. Sabiedriskā transporta pakalpojumu likums: LR likums (2007) [online] [08.11.2011.]. Available at: http://www.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=159858. 2. Administratīvo teritoriju un apdzīvoto vietu likums: LR likums (2008) [online] [08.11.2011.]. Available at: http://www.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=185993. 3. Maršruti un kustību saraksti [online] [20.01.2012.]. Available at: http://www.marsruti.lv/jelgava/index.html. 4. KUSTĪBU SARAKSTS. AUTOOSTA.LV: [online] [22.02.2012.]. Available at: http://159.148.86.171/eticket/races.jsp. 387