The Impact of the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP)

Similar documents
Scottish Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR)

Pricing and funding for safety and quality: the Australian approach

Clinical Documentation: Beyond The Financials Cheryll A. Rogers, RHIA, CDIP, CCDS, CCS Senior Inpatient Consultant 3M HIS Consulting Services

CMS Quality Program- Outcome Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: December 2015 Revised: January 2018

TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY CORE OBJECTIVES: PGY 4

Supplementary Online Content

Reducing Readmissions: Potential Measurements

Analysis of Final Rule for FY 2009 Revisions to the Medicare Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Objectives 2/23/2011. Crossing Paths Intersection of Risk Adjustment and Coding

1. Recommended Nurse Sensitive Outcome: Adult inpatients who reported how often their pain was controlled.

FY 2014 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Proposed Rule

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

SCORING METHODOLOGY APRIL 2014

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Updated September 2007

Evidence for Accreditation in Bariatric Surgery Hospitals

Additional Considerations for SQRMS 2018 Measure Recommendations

Admissions and Readmissions Related to Adverse Events, NMCPHC-EDC-TR

Scoring Methodology FALL 2016

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

Healthcare Reform Hospital Perspective

Understanding Readmissions after Cancer Surgery in Vulnerable Hospitals

August 1, 2012 (202) CMS makes changes to improve quality of care during hospital inpatient stays

Understanding HSCRC Quality Programs and Methodology Updates

Essentials for Clinical Documentation Integrity 2017

Improving quality of care during inpatient hospital stays

3M Potentially Preventable Complications (PPCs) Version 31.0 (effective 10/01/2013) Methodology Overview

Minority Serving Hospitals and Cancer Surgery Readmissions: A Reason for Concern

Comparison of Care in Hospital Outpatient Departments and Physician Offices

Program Selection Criteria: Bariatric Surgery

2017 Quality Reporting: Claims and Administrative Data-Based Quality Measures For Medicare Shared Savings Program and Next Generation ACO Model ACOs

DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY DIVISION OF ACUTE CARE SURGERY ACUTE CARE SURGERY ROTATION (SA1 & SA2)

Is there an impact of Health Information Technology on Delivery and Quality of Patient Care?

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

Welcome and Instructions

Learning Objectives. Denver Health Medical Center. Complex Coding Scenarios and Resolution

Health Economics Program

Scoring Methodology FALL 2017

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program Measures (Calendar Year 2012 Discharges - Revised)

Quality Reporting in the Public Domain

The Impact of Healthcare-associated Infections in Pennsylvania 2010

(202) or CMS Proposals to Improve Quality of Care during Hospital Inpatient Stays

Case-mix Analysis Across Patient Populations and Boundaries: A Refined Classification System

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: APPENDICES TO MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATIVE RULES, CHAPTER 4654

2015 Executive Overview

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Comparing Patient Safety in Rural Hospitals by Bed Count

Disclosure of Proprietary Interest

Accreditation, Quality, Risk & Patient Safety

2016 HCPro, a division of BLR. All rights reserved. These materials may not be duplicated without express written permission.

TQIP and Risk Adjusted Benchmarking

266 QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE/VOLUME 19, ISSUE 3, JULY SEPTEMBER 2010

STATISTICAL BRIEF #9. Hospitalizations among Males, Highlights. Introduction. Findings. June 2006

Pediatric Surgery Curriculum Clinical Base Year

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

Impacting Quality Initiatives through Documentation Improvement. Fran Jurcak, MSN, RN, CCDS Vice President of Clinical Innovation Iodine Software

Conditions of Use & Reporting Methods of Patient Safety Indicators in OECD Countries

Readmissions Moving beyond blame to fill the patient needs. Jackie Conrad RN, MBA, RCC Cynosure Health

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

Community Performance Report

Factors that Impact Readmission for Medicare and Medicaid HMO Inpatients

Reimbursement Policy Subject: Present on Admission Indicator for Health Care-Acquired Conditions 06/01/12 05/02/16 Administration Policy

Star Rating Method for Single and Composite Measures

Risk Factor Analysis for Postoperative Unplanned Intubation and Ventilator Dependence

Medicare s Inpatient Final Rule for Claire Kapilow, Director, Regulatory Affairs

The Nexus of Quality and Finance

Health Care Quality Indicators in the Irish Health System:

Readmission Policy REIMBURSEMENT POLICY UB-04. Reimbursement Policy Oversight Committee

The Role of Analytics in the Development of a Successful Readmissions Program

Reimbursement Policy Subject: Present on Admission Indicator for Health Care-Acquired Conditions 01/01/14 Administration 05/02/16

paymentbasics The IPPS payment rates are intended to cover the costs that reasonably efficient providers would incur in furnishing highquality

IN EFFORTS to control costs, many. Pediatric Length of Stay Guidelines and Routine Practice. The Case of Milliman and Robertson ARTICLE

The Camden Coalition of Healthcare. Management

The dawn of hospital pay for quality has arrived. Hospitals have been reporting

SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND AFFILIATED ENTITIES ONGOING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EVALUATION POLICY (OPPE)

Hospital data to improve the quality of care and patient safety in oncology

Emergency readmission rates

Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. Division of Trauma, Acute Care & Critical Care Surgery

Using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Metrics Data to Change Clinical Practice Abigail R. Blackmore, MSN, RN Pamela W.

O U T C O M E. record-based. measures HOSPITAL RE-ADMISSION RATES: APPROACH TO DIAGNOSIS-BASED MEASURES FULL REPORT

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine Rotation: Post Anesthesia Care Unit (CA-1, CA-2, CA-3)

Prepared for North Gunther Hospital Medicare ID August 06, 2012

Reimbursement Policy Subject: Present on Admission Indicator for Health Care-Acquired Conditions 04/01/14 Administration 05/02/16

Type of intervention Secondary prevention of heart failure (HF)-related events in patients at risk of HF.

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

National Priorities for Improvement:

Overview of the Hospital Safety Score September 24, Missy Danforth, Senior Director of Hospital Ratings, The Leapfrog Group

ACS NSQIP Pediatric Participant Use Data File (PUF)

Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program. Hospital-Specific Report User Guide Fiscal Year 2017

Scoring Methodology SPRING 2018

Factors influencing patients length of stay

Analysis of Final Rule for FY 2007 Revisions to the Medicare Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Questions. Background to the ICNARC Case Mix Programme

CME Disclosure. HCAHPS- Hardwiring Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success. Accreditation Statement. Designation of Credit.

Identifying Potentially Preventable Readmissions

NMSA Hospital-Acquired Infection

Table of Contents. Overview. Demographics Section One

Overview of the Spring 2016 Hospital Safety Score March 7, Missy Danforth, Vice President of Hospital Ratings, The Leapfrog Group

Iowa Healthcare Collaborative - HEN 2.0 Measures

HEDIS Ad-Hoc Public Comment: Table of Contents

Transcription:

The Impact of the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) 2006 2008 David R. Flum, MD, MPH Sean D. Sullivan, PhD Rebecca Gaston Symons, MPH This project is funded by Life Sciences Discovery Fund Award No. 1876370 The Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program is a program of the Foundation for Healthcare Quality operated under Washington State s Department of Health as Coordinated Quality Improvement Program (CQIP). University of Washington s Surgical Outcomes Research Center serves as the academic home for research. Primary collaborators in this technical report include: David Flum MD, Allison Devlin Rhodes MS, Rebecca Gaston Symons MPH, Sarah O. Lawrence MA (Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington); Sean Sullivan PhD (Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, University of Washington); William O Brien (Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington); Justine Norwitz (JSN Consulting, Inc); and Terry Rogers MD, Rosa Johnson ARNP, MN, CPHQ (Foundation for Health Care Quality).

SCOAP Technical Report (PI: Flum) Page 2 of 13 Introduction The Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) is a state-wide, multi-hospital quality improvement program initiated in 2006 and expanded in 2008 through a grant from the State of Washington Life Sciences Discovery Fund (LSDF). The purpose of SCOAP is to improve the safety, quality and efficiency of surgical care across statewide hospitals. As part of our commitment to evaluating the impact of SCOAP in Washington state, we have undertaken a number of studies to estimate the impact of surgical quality improvement programs undertaken in SCOAP hospitals on measures of quality, outcomes and hospital resource use and costs. The purpose of this specific evaluation is to determine the resource use and cost implications of quality improvement initiatives in SCOAP hospitals. Three surgical procedures were selected for this evaluation (elective colectomy, gastric bypass, and non-elective appendectomy). Methodology Data Source We used two data sources for this research: the SCOAP hospital database and the Washington State Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System (CHARS) database. CHARS includes discharge abstract data from all public and private acute-care hospitals in Washington State (excluding Veterans Affairs and military hospitals). Each record of the dataset contains demographic variables, admission and discharge administrative details, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) procedure and diagnosis codes and coded hospital identifiers. We identified all cases of colectomy, gastric bypass for severe obesity and non-elective appendectomy in the CHARS database for 2006 through 2008 along with all subsequent readmissions. Index cases were identified based on ICD-9 procedure codes (Appendix A). The charlson index, a summary value of comorbid conditions derived from ICD-9 procedure codes, was used to characterize the analytic cohort.. Readmissions were probability matched to SCOAP index procedures based on available patient identifiers. The SCOAP hospital data includes information about how the procedures were done and the results of those procedures. SCOAP data were not used in this economic impact assessment, but hospitals that were using SCOAP were characterized as SCOAP hospitals. Variable Definitions SCOAP procedures Cases were categorized as SCOAP procedures if they occurred during and after a hospital s first quarter of SCOAP participation. All other procedure records were categorized as Non-SCOAP. Cost The CHARS dataset provides a value for total hospital charges for each inpatient record. Costs in dollars were computed by adjusting charges with the year-specific WA average ratio of charge to cost (RCC). Then, all costs were expressed in 2008 monetary values using the year-specific CPI (hospital services) conversion factor. Length of Stay (LOS) The length of stay for each record is provided as the discharge date minus the admit date. The resulting length of stay is reported in whole days.

SCOAP Technical Report (PI: Flum) Page 3 of 13 Cost per day (C/D) The total cost divided by the number of days for each record is reported as the average cost per day. Adverse events (AE) Both index admissions and 30-day readmissions were evaluated for adverse outcomes. Adverse outcomes were identified based on ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes (Appendix B). 30 - Readmissions Admissions that occurred within 30 days of discharge from the index admission were considered for evaluation. Readmission hospital may or may not be the same as the index hospital. The costs of the readmissions were added to the index admission cost to calculate the total 30-day cost of care. Analysis Means of continuous variables are compared across groups using t-test and ANOVA, depending on the set of independent variables being considered. Relationships between categorical variables are evaluated using Pearson s X 2. Ordinary least squares regression was used to evaluate the relationship between multiple independent variables and total cost, average length of stay and cost per day. Independent variables included a Year specific dummy variable, a measure of hospital teaching status and geographic location, and an indicator of whether or not an adverse event occurred as part of the procedure.

SCOAP Technical Report (PI: Flum) Page 4 of 13 Results Washington State Hospitals & SCOAP 82 Washington hospitals were identified as having done at least one of the surgical procedures of interest during the years 2006 to 2008. In 2006, the average number of SCOAP participating hospitals was 13. In 2007 that number increased to 18 and increased again in 2008 to 27 (as of January 2010 the number of participating institutions is 56). By the fourth quarter of 2008, 30 hospitals were participating in SCOAP; (36% of the Washington hospitals performing the surgical procedures under consideration). Figure 1: Number of SCOAP hospitals by Quarter Number of SCOAP Hospitals 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Q1 2006 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 2007 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 2008 Q2 Q3 Q4 Between 2006 and 2008, 9,440 cases of elective colectomy, 3,016 cases of gastric bypass and 14,445 cases of non-elective appendectomy were identified in the CHARS database. Cases were excluded if the patient was less than 18 years old. In 2006, SCOAP procedures accounted for 30% of elective colectomy, 39% of gastric bypass and 19% of appendectomy. In 2008, SCOAP covered 50%, 65% and 42% of colectomy, bypass and appendectomy, respectively (Figure 2). Figure2: SCOAP Penetration in Washington State (SCOAP cases by year) 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2006 2007 2008 Colectomy Bypass Appendectomy

SCOAP Technical Report (PI: Flum) Page 5 of 13 The SCOAP Population To account for differences in patients and hospitals that may account for cost differentials we describe these characteristics across SCOAP and non-scoap hospitals (Table 1). Statistically significant differences in characteristics were accounted for in adjusted estimates. Table 1. Procedure characteristics by SCOAP participation and procedure type. Elective Colectomy Gastric Bypass Non-Elective Appendectomy Non- SCOAP SCOAP Total p Non- SCOAP SCOAP Total p Non- SCOAP SCOAP Total p N 5788 3652 9440 1388 1628 3016 10053 4392 14445 Patient characteristics Male 45.9 45.5 45.8 0.7 24.2 22.9 23.5 0.4 52.1 52.8 52.3 0.5 Age (mean) 63.6 61.4 62.7 0.000 48.3 49.7 49.0 0.004 40.5 40.6 40.5 0.7 Medicaid 4.3 5.0 4.6 0.09 1.9 4.4 3.2 0.000 9.3 8.6 9.1 0.2 Charlson 0.004 0.01 0.6 0 42.8 42.9 42.8 52.7 46.8 49.5 86.8 87.2 86.9 1 12.3 10.1 11.4 32.9 37.9 35.6 10.5 10.0 10.4 2 20.6 20.6 20.6 8.0 9.0 8.5 1.9 1.8 1.9 3 24.3 26.5 25.2 6.5 6.3 6.4 0.8 1.0 0.9 Hospital Characteristics Teaching Hospital 13.3 68.2 34.6 0.000 24.0 87.0 58.0 0.000 13.8 56.3 27.1 0.000 Rural Hospital 8.6 4.3 7.0 0.000 1.6 0.0 0.7 0.000 10.4 7.7 9.6 0.000

SCOAP Technical Report (PI: Flum) Page 6 of 13 Unadjusted Procedure costs For all procedures the unadjusted average cost at a SCOAP hospital was significantly less than the cost at a Non-SCOAP hospital. Among colectomy cases, the average costs were $19,591 and $17,191 for Non- SCOAP and SCOAP, respectively (p < 0.000). For bypass procedures, the Non-SCOAP and SCOAP costs were $22,192 and $14,797 (p < 0.000), respectively. For appendectomy, the costs were $9,853 and $8,083 (p < 0.000). SCOAP hospital appear to be bending the cost curve by keeping costs of care low while costs of care remain the same or increase in non-scoap hospitals. Figure3a: Unadjusted Average Cost: Colectomy $22,000 $20,000 $18,000 $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 2006 2007 2008 Non SCOAP SCOAP Figure3b: Unadjusted Average Cost: Bypass $24,000 $22,000 $20,000 $18,000 $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 2006 2007 2008 Non SCOAP SCOAP

SCOAP Technical Report (PI: Flum) Page 7 of 13 Figure3c: Unadjusted Average Cost: Appendectomy $19,000 $17,000 $15,000 $13,000 $11,000 $9,000 $7,000 $5,000 2006 2007 2008 Non SCOAP SCOAP Estimated Cost Difference The adjusted cost difference is the product of the adjusted cost per day difference between SCOAP and Non-SCOAP procedures, the adjusted LOS and volume of SCOAP procedures. Cost and LOS values have been adjusted for year, adverse event, hospital location & type. (Appendix C: Regression Models) Table 2: Select coefficients from the OLS regression models Adjusted LOS Adjusted Cost/Day Non-SCOAP SCOAP Non-SCOAP SCOAP Colectomy 6.2 6.2 3057.57 2380.36 Bypass 4.1 3.1 8459.58 6052.58 Appendectomy 2.3 2.4 5362.50 4359.64 Cost/Day difference 95% Conf. Interval Lower Upper Limit Limit Total Cost difference 95% Conf. Interval Lower Upper Limit Limit Colectomy 677.21 599.45 754.97 15,219,000 13,472,000 16,967,000 Bypass 2407.01 1836.47 2977.54 12,167,000 9,283,000 15,051,000 Appendectomy 1002.87 887.92 1117.82 10,425,000 9,230,000 11,620,000 The estimated total adjusted cost difference (all procedures combined): $37,812,000 (95% CI: [$31,985,000, $43,638,000])

SCOAP Technical Report (PI: Flum) Page 8 of 13 Projected Cost differences Based on the 2008 volume and distribution of surgical cases, adjusted LOS, adjusted cost differences & 2009 SCOAP hospital enrollment, we have projected cost differences for 2009 of $24,585,000 but estimates are limited by projection from 2008. The total projected cost difference for 2006 to 2009 would be $62,396,000. Figure 4: Total Adjusted Cost Differences by Year (Projected for 2009) 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 Conclusions The estimated unadjusted total cost difference (all procedures and years, combined) between SCOAP and non-scoap hospitals 2006-2008 was $30,183,000 (after adjustment for patient and center characteristics $37,811,000). This difference represents expenses that may have been incurred had the SCOAP program not existed during this time period and may be considered as costs not incurred (savings) by the system. SCOAP hospitals nearly doubled in number after the close of this data window and based on projections extended from 2008 data it may be that there have been over $60 million in cost differences by the end of 2009. The differences in costs are the result of decreased intensity of care (cost/day) at SCOAP hospitals but length of stay is only lower amongst selected procedures. A more refined analysis using robust 2009 and 2010 data, and pre- and post-scoap, by hospital analyses will be forthcoming when those CHARS data are released.

SCOAP Technical Report (PI: Flum) Page 9 of 13 Appendices Appendix A: ICD-9 procedure codes for index case identification Colectomy Bypass Appendectomy 45.71 17.31 45.8 44.31 47.01 45.72 17.32 45.81 44.38 47.09 45.73 17.33 45.82 44.39 45.74 17.34 45.83 45.75 17.35 45.76 17.36 45.79 17.39

SCOAP Technical Report (PI: Flum) Page 10 of 13 Appendix B: ICD-9 diagnoses and procedure codes for included adverse events Complications included during index admission Diagnosis or procedure code* Cardiac arrest 427.5 Pulmonary Temporary tracheostomy 31.1* Continuous mechanical ventilation for 96 consecutive hours or more 96.71* Pulmonary embolism and infarction 415.1, 415.11 Iatrogenic pneumothorax (postoperative) 512.1 Pulmonary edema, postoperative 518.4 Pulmonary insufficiency following trauma and surgery 518.5 Urinary complications, specified as due to a procedure 997.5 Infectious Respiratory complications, pneumonia, resulting from a procedure 997.3 Postoperative infection 998.5, 998.51, 998.59 Percutaneous drainage or abdominal wall incision for abscess 54.0, 54.91* Postoperative shock 998.0 Wound related Disruption of operation wound 998.3, 998.31, 998.32 Non-healing surgical wound 998.83 Persistent postoperative fistula 998.6 Procedure related Reopening of recent thoracotomy site 34.03* Hemorrhage, hematoma, or seroma complicating a procedure 998.11, 998.12, 998.13 Foreign body accidentally left during a procedure 998.4 Additional complications included if hospital readmission occurred* Cardiac

SCOAP Technical Report (PI: Flum) Page 11 of 13 Myocardial infarction 410.0, 410.1, 410.2, 410.3, 410.4, 410.5, 410.6, 410.7, 410.8, 410.9, 411.1, 411.81, 411.89 Heart failure, acute 428.21, 428.23, 428.31, 428.33, 428.41, 428.43 Acute respiratory failure 518.81, 518.82, 518.84 Acute renal failure 584.5, 584.6, 584.7, 584.8, 584.9 Infectious Pneumococcl pneumonia 481 Other bacterial pneumonia 482.0, 482.1, 482.2, 482.3, 482.4, 482.8, 482.9 Urinary tract infection 599.0 Infections of the kidney 590.1, 590.10, 590.11, 590.2, 590.8, 590.80, 590.81, 590.9 Bacteremia 790.7 Septicemia 38.0, 38.1, 38.10, 38.11, 38.19, 38.2, 038.3, 38.4, 38.41, 38.42, 38.43, 38.44, 38.49, 38.8, 38.9 Drainage of intraperitoneal abscess 54.19* Delirium, acute and subacute 293.0, 293.1 Procedure related Incision of chest wall and pleura, insertion of intercostal catheter 34.01, 34.09, 34.04* Reopening of recent laparotomy 54.12* Esophagostomy, surture of laceration of esophagus 42.10, 42.11, 42.19, 42.82* Revision of gastric anastamosis, suture of laceration of stomach 44.5, 44.61* Revision of anastamosis of intestine 46.93, 46.94* Other repair of intestine or rectum, colostomy 46.71, 46.72, 46.73, 46.74, 46.75,

SCOAP Technical Report (PI: Flum) Page 12 of 13 46.76, 46.79, 48.71, 46.10, 46.11, 46.13, 46.14* Anastamosis or revision of gallbladder or bile duct 51.36, 51.37, 51.3951.94* Repair of bile ducts, liver, pancreas 51.71, 51.79, 50.61, 50.69, 52.95* Suture of laceration of kidney, ureter, bladder 55.81, 56.82, 57.81* * indicates procedure codes

SCOAP Technical Report (PI: Flum) Page 13 of 13 Appendix C: Regression Models for Adjusted Procedure Costs and Length of Stay Colectomy Cost Length of stay Cost per day Coef. Std. Err. p Coef. Std. Err. p Coef. Std. Err. p Year 2007 235.3289 496.1167 0.6-0.14857 0.154467 0.3 74.6538 38.53527 0.05 Year 2008 42.10906 504.1721 0.9-0.19289 0.156976 0.2 60.50361 39.16097 0.1 Rural Hospital -3039.35 821.481 0.000 0.294083 0.255771 0.3-559.192 63.80755 0.000 Teaching Hospital 1246.074 524.7099 0.02 0.240882 0.16337 0.1 72.05776 40.75622 0.08 Adverse Event 18397.84 562.3812 0.000 6.112514 0.175099 0.000 98.92872 43.68229 0.02 SCOAP procedure -3472.5 510.739 0.000-0.00697 0.15902 1.0-677.21 39.67104 0.000 Intercept 16900.93 400.5516 0.000 6.160774 0.124713 0.000 3057.574 31.11237 0.000 Bypass Cost Length of stay Cost per day Coef. Std. Err. p Coef. Std. Err. p Coef. Std. Err. p Year 2007-204.176 921.5023 0.8-0.15336 0.318573 0.6 247.3035 270.4748 0.4 Year 2008-690.771 924.9171 0.5-0.43589 0.319754 0.2 1314.581 271.4771 0.000 Rural Hospital 4714.446 4148.006 0.3 6.521246 1.43401 0.000-5884.68 1217.502 0.000 Teaching Hospital -868.56 987.698 0.4 0.750634 0.341458 0.03-2404.72 289.9042 0.000 Adverse Event 23476.77 1233.78 0.000 8.555004 0.426531 0.000-1978.88 362.133 0.000 SCOAP procedure -6824.8 991.3495 0.000-0.95453 0.34272 0.005-2407.01 290.976 0.000 Intercept 20600.1 800.212 0.000 4.059462 0.276642 0.000 8459.582 234.8742 0.000 Appendectomy Cost Length of stay Cost per day Coef. Std. Err. p Coef. Std. Err. p Coef. Std. Err. p Year 2007 285.8561 163.2866 0.08-0.03734 0.06214 0.5 253.9579 58.35879 0.000 Year 2008 149.5253 166.0657 0.4-0.1423 0.063198 0.02 364.3004 59.35205 0.000 Rural Hospital -1819.96 228.1707 0.000-0.02066 0.086833 0.8-1014.76 81.54844 0.000 Teaching Hospital 45.8134 170.1927 0.8-0.2195 0.064769 0.001 541.8828 60.82703 0.000 Adverse Event 13385.24 307.2596 0.000 5.797503 0.116931 0.000-1916.6 109.8149 0.000 SCOAP procedure -1746.41 164.0836 0.000 0.037084 0.062444 0.6-1002.87 58.64363 0.000 Intercept 9251.376 126.8644 0.000 2.32977 0.04828 0.000 5362.504 45.34148 0.000