The development objective of Fadama III Project is to increase the incomes of users of rural land and water resources on a sustainable basis.

Implementation Status & Results Nigeria THIRD NATIONAL FADAMA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (FADAMA III) (P096572) Operation Name: THIRD NATIONAL FADAMA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 12 Status: ARCHIVED Archive : 12-Mar-2014 (FADAMA III) (P096572) Country: Nigeria Approval FY: 2009 Product Line: IBRD/IDA Region: AFRICA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Key s Board Approval 01-Jul-2008 Original Closing Planned Mid Term Review 07-Nov-2011 Last Archived ISR 19-Nov-2013 Effectiveness 23-Mar-2009 Revised Closing 31-Dec-2017 Actual Mid Term Review 26-Jan-2012 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The development objective of Fadama III Project is to increase the incomes of users of rural land and water resources on a sustainable basis. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Capacity Building, Local Government, and Communications and Information Support 87.50 Small-Scale Community-owned Infrastructure 75.00 Advisory Services and Input Support 39.50 Support to the ADPs and Adaptive Research 36.50 Asset Acquisition 150.00 Project Administration, Monitoring and Evaluation 58.80 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Risk Rating Low Low Implementation Status Overview The Additional Financing of the project in support of the Agricultural Transformation Agenda of government was approved by the Board on June 28, 2013 and the team has Page 1 of 24

processed its effectiveness. It is now effective and the disbursement condition has just been met. Action plan has been prepared with the team to ensure accelerated disbursement in the next 6 months. The project's closing date has been extended till 2017 and is expected to play the interface role between the Agro-industries in the core areas of Staple Crop Processing zones and producers; speeding up formation of farmers organization and, providing support for access to technologies in close partnership with WAAPP, and rural infrastructure in the catchment areas. At December, 2013, the disbursement rate of the parent project stood at 97.0% and is progressing satisfactorily. The status of the state and local governments counterpart contributions has improved a bit and were at 67.5% and 63.0% respectively. To date, a total of 4,578 LDPs containing 57,010 subprojects were prepared, compared to 3931 and 48,289 recorded during the last mission. Of these, 4,348 LDPs and 56,841 subprojects representing 94.9 and 99.7 percent were approved respectively. As a result of the capacity building given to beneficiaries, 75 percent of the approved LDPs and 87 percent of subprojects have been fully implemented. The remaining 13% are at varying levels of completion. In addition, a total of 462 LGAs (67.4%) has already integrated the project LDPs into their Annual Work Plan and Budget (AWPB). Local Government authorities collaborate on sub-project supervision, maintenance and mobilization of beneficiaries contributions. A total of 15,586 FUGs have saved N630,940,518.21 in FUEF account. This represents 7.7% of the total value of asset (N8,134,879,138.36).As part of the sustainability plan for the project, about 10 states are currently at an advanced stage of floating their own micro finance bank having saved up to 20 million naira each, which is the minimum requirement for unit MFB as stipulated by CBN. Given the progress of project implementation at the state level and the exhaustion of funds in certain categories for most states, the state teams are now focusing more on strengthening the sustainability strategies of the project. Some of the sustainability activities of the project are the following: (i). Maintenance of FUEF account which is a savings account where not less than 10% of the replacement value of the asset is saved in addition to other savings from user charges, contributions, etc. (ii). Federation of Fadama Community Associations: The FCAs are federated horizontally and vertically at the local government and state levels. These federations are being linked to markets and financial institutions. The federation along commodity lines (horizontal federation) has also led to the emergence of producer groups of two commodities per state based on comparative advantage in production. Efforts are being made to focus on ATA priority crops. (iii)integration of LDP in Local Government Annual Work Plan and Budget (AWBP): Most local governments are integrating the sub projects of Fadama into their AWPB. There is also involvement of local government staff in appraisal and monitoring of sub projects at the community level. (iv). Value addition: The number of value added products has increased significantly on the project and led to reduction of post-harvest losses. Different forms of products are processed and packaged for large stores and super markets. Currently there is an on-going collaboration between the project and NAFDAC for product branding and standardization. The Fadama Fair was postponed to hold by mid 2014 due to political disturbances and tight budget. The Fair will showcase Fadama products and link farmers to markets, inputs and large scale processors. Locations Country First Administrative Division Location Planned Actual Nigeria Sokoto State Yabo Nigeria Niger State Wushishi Nigeria Sokoto State Wurno Nigeria Sokoto State Wamako Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Uyo Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Utu Etim Ekpo Nigeria Abia State Umuahia Nigeria Not Entered Ukum Nigeria Anambra Ukpo-Akpu Nigeria Sokoto State Tureta Page 2 of 24

Country First Administrative Division Location Planned Actual Nigeria Kano State Tudun Wada Nigeria Kano State Tsanyawa Nigeria Not Entered Tede Nigeria Benue State Tarka Nigeria Sokoto State Tambawel Nigeria Kano State Sumaila Nigeria Not Entered Abuja Nigeria Sokoto State Silame Nigeria Niger State Shiroro Nigeria Kano State Shanono Nigeria Sokoto State Shagari Nigeria Delta State Sapele Nigeria Sokoto State Sabon Birni Nigeria Kano State Rogo Nigeria Katsina State Rimi Nigeria Niger State Rijau Nigeria Sokoto State Rabah Nigeria Rivers State Port Harcourt Nigeria Plateau State Plateau State Nigeria Delta State Patani Nigeria Benue State Oturkpo Nigeria Osun State Osogbo Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Oduko Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Oron Nigeria Not Entered Orolu Page 3 of 24

Nigeria Anambra Onitsha Nigeria Ondo State Ondo State Nigeria Rivers State Okrika Nigeria Delta State Okpe Nigeria Benue State Oju Nigeria Abia State Ohafia Nigeria Imo State Oguta Nigeria Ogun State Ogun State Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Obot-Akara Nigeria Anambra Nnewi Nigeria Imo State Nkwerre Nigeria Kano State Minjibir Nigeria Katsina State Matasu Nigeria Niger State Mariga Nigeria Katsina State Mani Nigeria Benue State Makurdi Nigeria Kano State Makuda Nigeria Kogi State Lokoja Nigeria Not Entered Lapai Nigeria Lagos Lagos State Nigeria Sokoto State Kware Nigeria Kwara State Kwara State Nigeria Not Entered Kwande Nigeria Katsina State Kurfi Nigeria Kano State Kura Page 4 of 24

Nigeria Kano State Kunchi Nigeria Kano State Kumbotso Nigeria Niger State Kontagora Nigeria Sokoto State Kebbi Nigeria Not Entered Katsina Ala Nigeria Katsina State Katsina Nigeria Kano State Karaye Nigeria Katsina State Kankara Nigeria Katsina State Kaita Nigeria Katsina State Kafur Nigeria Kaduna State Kaduna State Nigeria Not Entered Iwo Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Itu Nigeria Not Entered Iseyin Nigeria Zamfara State Isa Nigeria Zamfara State Ini Nigeria Katsina State Ingawa Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Ikot-Ekpene Nigeria Imo State Ihitte Ogwa Nigeria Anambra Ihiala Nigeria Kogi State Idah Nigeria Sokoto State Gwadabawa Nigeria Sokoto State Goronyo Nigeria Kano State Gezawa Nigeria Not Entered Gburuku Page 5 of 24

Nigeria Benue State Gboko Nigeria Kano State Garko Nigeria Sokoto State Gada Nigeria Katsina State Faskari Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Etinan Nigeria Rivers State Emohua Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Eman Uruan Nigeria Anambra Ekwulobia Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Eket Nigeria Katsina State Dutsin Ma Nigeria Kogi State Dekina Nigeria Rivers State Degema Nigeria Kano State Dawaki Nigeria Katsina State Daura Nigeria Cross River State Cross River State Nigeria Katsina State Cheranchi Nigeria Kano State Bunkure Nigeria Sokoto State Binji Nigeria Katsina State Bindawa Nigeria Abia State Bende Nigeria Kano State Bebeji Nigeria Katsina State Baure Nigeria Bauchi Bauchi State Nigeria Katsina State Batagarawa Nigeria Katsina State Bakori Page 6 of 24

Nigeria Kano State Bagwai Nigeria Abia State Arochukwu Nigeria Kogi State Ankpa Nigeria Kano State Albasu Nigeria Oyo State Akinyele Nigeria Kogi State Ajaokuta Nigeria Rivers State Ahoada Nigeria Anambra Aguata Nigeria Abuja Federal Capital Territory Abuja Federal Capital Territory Nigeria Rivers State Abua Nigeria Rivers State Abonnema Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Abak Nigeria Adamawa State Adamawa State Nigeria Ekpoma Ekpoma Nigeria Enugu State Enugu State Nigeria Jigawa State Jigawa State Nigeria Oyo State Egbeda Nigeria Bayelsa State Bayelsa State Nigeria Ebonyi State Ebonyi State Nigeria Ekiti State Ekiti State Nigeria Gombe State Gombe State Nigeria Zamfara State Zamfara State Nigeria Kebbi State Kebbi State Nigeria Taraba State Taraba State Nigeria Yobe State Yobe State Page 7 of 24

Nigeria Benue State Okpokwu Nigeria Imo State Isu Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Ibesikpo Nigeria Abia State Osisioma Nigeria Plateau State Nasarawa State Nigeria Imo State Aba North Nigeria Abia State Aba South Nigeria Abia State Ikwuano Nigeria Abia State Isiala-Ngwa North Nigeria Abia State Isuikwato Nigeria Abia State Ukwa East Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Mkpat-Enin Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Oruk Anam Nigeria Enugu State Anambra East Nigeria Anambra Anaocha Nigeria Anambra Awka North Nigeria Anambra Awka South Nigeria Enugu State Ayamelum Nigeria Kano State Tofa Nigeria Kogi State Ogori/Mangongo Nigeria Niger State Katcha Nigeria Niger State Magama Nigeria Niger State Mokwa Nigeria Niger State Rafi Nigeria Osun State Ede North Page 8 of 24

Nigeria Osun State Egbedore Nigeria Osun State Ife Central Nigeria Osun State Ife East Nigeria Osun State Ife South Nigeria Osun State Ifelodun Nigeria Osun State Ila Nigeria Osun State Irepodun Nigeria Osun State Irewole Nigeria Osun State Isokan Nigeria Osun State Odo-Otin Nigeria Osun State Ola-Oluwa Nigeria Osun State Olorunda Nigeria Osun State Oriade Nigeria Oyo State Iwajowa Nigeria Oyo State Ogo Oluwa Nigeria Oyo State Olorunsogo Nigeria Oyo State Oluyole Nigeria Oyo State Ona-Ara Nigeria Oyo State Orelope Nigeria Rivers State Ahoada West Nigeria Not Entered Andoni Nigeria Rivers State Eleme Nigeria Rivers State Etche Nigeria Rivers State Obia/Akpor Nigeria Rivers State Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni Page 9 of 24

Nigeria Abia State Omumma Nigeria Rivers State Oyigbo Nigeria Rivers State Tai Nigeria Sokoto State Bodinga Nigeria Sokoto State Illela Nigeria Sokoto State Sokoto North Nigeria Sokoto State Sokoto South Nigeria Enugu State Anambra West Nigeria Enugu State Idemili North Nigeria Anambra Idemili South Nigeria Anambra Njikoka Nigeria Anambra Nnewi South Nigeria Anambra Ogbaru Nigeria Anambra Orumba North Nigeria Anambra Orumba North Nigeria Anambra Orumba South Nigeria Anambra Oyi Nigeria Benue State Guma Nigeria Benue State Gwer East Nigeria Benue State Logo Nigeria Kogi State Ogbadibo Nigeria Benue State Vandeikya Nigeria Kano State Warawa Nigeria Katsina State Kankia Nigeria Katsina State Mai'Adua Page 10 of 24

Nigeria Katsina State Sabuwa Nigeria Ondo State Isiala-Nngwa South Nigeria Abia State Ugwunagbo Nigeria Abia State Ukwa West Nigeria Abia State Umuahia South Nigeria Imo State Umu-Neochi Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Eastern Obolo Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Essien- Udim Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Nsit Atai Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Nsit Ubium Nigeria Akwa Ibom State Onna Nigeria Benue State Agatu Nigeria Benue State Gwer West Nigeria Benue State Konshisha Nigeria Benue State Ushongo Results Project Development Objective Indicators Page 11 of 24

Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Current End Target Average real income of Fadama user Text Value N70,604/Annum/Household 184240.96 N98,845.60 households This will be monitored through the project life on annual basis Physical verification of operations, maintenance and utilization of assets at midterm and at Project closing by surveys of randomly selected sites shows that at least 50% of assets & community-owned The average income of Fadama beneficiaries across the country increased from N70,604 to N237,118.11. This is deflated by the CPI to get real income of N184,240.96. IFPRI (2012) reported at midline that the income of Fadama III beneficiaries increased by 19% on average, a level which is about 50% of the targeted increase of 40% for 75% of the beneficiaries. In addition, there was an increase of 48% in the income of female beneficiaries and 36% for beneficiaries in the poorest tercile. 75% of the beneficiaries would have increased their real income by 40% Percentage Value 0.00 47.12 50.00 There was no asset and infrastructure yet funded by the project. Infrastructure and asset acquired are in good condition and functional. A total of 170,526 assets are functioning Satisfactorily, 30,179 out of 64,043(47.1%) FUGs participating in the project own Productive assets. More assets and infrastructure are being acquired (187,654) This is expected to be evaluated at project completion. Page 12 of 24

Surveys at mid-term and at Project closing to show that at least 75 percent of Fadama users are satisfied with operations, maintenance & utilization of community-owned infrastructure & capital assets 10% of the replacement value of the common asset used for income generating activities of FUGs is saved annually (with effect from year 2) 20% increase in yield of primary agricultural products (disaggregated by crops / agroforestry, livestock and fisheries, etc) of participating households. Percentage Value 0.00 88.58 75.00 Association are just established and no assets have been acquired Monitoring Data as at December, 2013 showed that 30,179 out of 64,043 FUGs participating in the project own Productive assets. Out of these, 27,528 (91.4%), 26,485 (87.76%) and 26,129 (86.58) claimed to be satisfied with operation, maintenance and utilization of assets, respectively. This gives 88.58% satisfaction rate on the average. Percentage Value 0.00 8.40 10.00 0% of the replacement cost of assets is currently saved. A total of 20,594 FUGs have save d (N841,685,404.54) in FUEF account. This represents 8.4% total value of assets N10,068,608,134.53 As part of the sustainability plan for the project, about 10 states are currently at an advanced stage of floating their own microfinance bank having saved up to 20Million Naira each, which is the minimum requirement for unit MFB as stipulated by CBN It is expected that at the end of the project, savings from all assets will be up to 10% Percentage Value 100.00 108.59 1000.00 The baseline value of the The RRA conducted in 2012 Agricultural Production index is 100 which is constructed for the agricultural products and this is going to be monitored during the project life on annual basis.crops Yield/ Hectare Maize - 1.5MT Rice - 1.916MT Sorghum - 1.182MT Millet - 1.085MT Groundnut - shows the increase of 8.59% In The Index for crop yield in above the yield in the base year 2008. There was an increase in yield of some major crops such as maize: 2.10mt; rice, 2.32mt; Survey is in progress across the 36 states and the FCT. APS result would be used to update this submission and the basket of crops for the national index. Page 13 of 24

75% of Fadama user households who benefit directly from Project supported activities, have increased their average real incomes by at least 40% 1.142MT Cowpea - 0.551MT Soybean -1.207MT Yam - 12.552MT Cassava - 12.505MT Livestock Small Ruminants - 2 kids/yr/animal Poultry Egg - 75% lay Broilers - 30weight gain/day Fisheries Clarias - 3g weight gain/day. T sorghum, 2.02mt; millet, 1.78mt; g/nut, 1.59mt; cowpea, 1.04mt; soya bean, 1.45mt; yam, 12.05mt; cassava, 12.872mt; livestock small ruminants Percentage Value 0.00 48.00 75.00 N70,604/Annum/Household The result from the midline impact study on income across the 35 participating states and FCT indicates that there is 19% increase for all beneficiaries, 48% increase for female beneficiaries and 36% for beneficiaries in the poorest tercile.(source: fadama midline report by IFPRI). Final impact evaluation will soon be conducted on the project. It is expected that 75% of Fadama Users Households have their incomes increased to at least N98,845.60. Intermediate Results Indicators Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Current End Target Roads constructed, Rural Kilometers Value 0.00 449.00 0 126 rural roads stretching up to 449km have been constructed across the 35 states and FCT implementing the Fadama project. Number of research institutes that received Number Value 0.00 1.00 12.00 research grant under the project None has received grant from the project IITA as the coordinating Research institute received fund on behalf of other participating Research institute e.g LCRI, NRCRI, NVRIetc At least 12 research institutes should have received grants for performance based research. Page 14 of 24

Number of ADP staff trained in the management and delivery of extension services Number of equipments acquired by FUGs and FCAs in the participating states (disaggregated by Crop production, livestock, fisheries,forestry, agro-processing) Crop Production Number Livestock Production Number Fisheries Number Forestry Number Agro Processing Number Number Value 0.00 1933.00 2000.00 None trained yet on the project as the project is just being prepared. 1,933 ADP staff has been trained to date Up to 2000 staff of ADP is expected to be trained to deliver extension services Number Value 0.00 187654.00 100000.00 No FUG has procured any asset 187,654 productive assets Have been acquired by FUGs across the identified enterprises while a total of 17,554 assets were acquired by vulnerable groups. Value 0.00 57415.00 No FUG has procured any asset on the project 57415 capital assets have been acquired by FUGs across the States. Value 0.00 66680.00 No FUG has procured any asset on the project 66,680 capital assets have been acquired by FUGs across the States Value 0.00 13935.00 No FUG has procured any asset 13,935 capital assets have been acquired by FUGs across the States. Value 0.00 6121.00 No FUG has procured any asset 6,121 assets. The figure has increased due to support to flooding in some areas which affected some capital assets which have been acquired by FUGs across states. An aggregation of all assets should be up to 100000 at the end of the project The target value was not disaggregated The target value was not disaggregated The target value was not disaggregated The target value was not disaggregated Value 0.00 12507.00 Page 15 of 24

Number of FUGs and FCAs receiving matching grant for the purchase of agricultural inputs under the project Number of FUGs and FCAs receiving grant resources for procuring rural advisory services under the project Number of productive rural infrastructure constructed in the participating communities (disaggregated by feeder roads, culverts / small bridges) Culverts Number Markets Number Feeder Roads Number No FUG has procured any asset 12,507 capital assets have been acquired by FUGs. The target value was not disaggregated Number Value 44186.00 50000.00 Disbursement has not commenced 44,186 FUGs out of 64,043 (68.99%) have received matching grant for input. Text Value No FUG collecting grant 34783 No FUG collecting grant 34,783(54.31%) out of 64,043 registered Fadama farmers have procured advisory services Number Value 0.00 13074.00 120000.00 No infrastructure constructed yet for Fadama III Project Rural infrastructure in Fadama includes warehouses, store, Drainages, Boreholes, open wells, VIP toilets, etc have been constructedacross the States. However the disaggregation below is for feeder roads, culvert, market and bridges. Value 0.00 400.00 No infrastructure constructed yet for Fadama III project 400 culverts are constructed so far by the project. Value 0.00 1733.00 No infrastructure constructed yet for Fadama III project A total of 1,733 market stalls have been constructed which comprises of 624 lock up shops, 1,005 market Stall and 104 cooling sheds. At least 50000 groups are expected to receive grants for inputs by project end This number is an aggregation of all infrastructure on the project Value 0.00 305.00 No target value for individual infrastructure item No target value for individual infrastructure item Page 16 of 24

Storage facilities Number No infrastructure constructed yet for Fadama III project 305 rural roads have been constructed, 126 feeder roads constructed and 179 feeder roads rehabilitated Value 0.00 295.00 No infrastructure constructed yet for Fadama III project 295 storage facilities are completed. This comprises of 174 cold rooms and 121 produce stores. Value 0.00 65.00 No target value for individual infrastructure item No target value for individual infrastructure item Small Bridges Number No infrastructure constructed 65 small bridges have been No target value for individual yet for Fadama III project constructed. infrastructure item Number of information dissemination media Number Value 9.00 10.00 available in participating states (disaggregated by media types) No media is being used for the project as the project is just being prepared Number of Local Government Authority (LGA) staff trained in Project Mgt Skills (Project planning, Cost Benefit Analysis, Financial Mgt., M&E & Social Mobilization Electronic media through Radio- 48,155 ; Television-27,277 ; Print media-19,519 ; Telephone/ GSM-42,987 ; Bulletin- 19,255; Handbook/Flyers-23,919; Email/ Internet-6,165; Jingles15,626; Documentary-80. Number Value 0.00 2709.00 3000.00 Groups are just being established Number of FUGs and FCAs trained Number Value 0.00 Groups are just being established 2,709 staff trained on project management, financial analysis, participatory M&E, environmental safeguards, group dynamics, cost effective environmental plan, conflict resolution etc. Training conducted on project implementation is indicated below. By end of project, the project information should be disseminated through 10 avenues At least 3000 staff members of LGA should be trained See indications below Page 17 of 24

FCAs Number FUGs Number Value 0.00 4430.00 6680.00 Groups are just being established 4,430 were trained on Community Based procurement, Financial Management, Environmental safeguards, group dynamics, cost effective environmental plan, conflict resolution etc. Value 0.00 48597.00 111000.00 Groups are just being established 48,597 have been trained on book keeping & financial records, marketing strategy, group dynamics, cost effective environmental plan, conflict resolution etc. The expectation is that all the FUGs targeted to be established will be trained The expectation is that all the FUGs targeted to be established will be trained. Number of Fadama User Groups (FUGs) and Number Value 0.00 Fadama Community Association (FCAs) registered Registered Groups are See the disaggregation below Registered Groups are indicated below for FCAs and FUGs indicated below FCAs Number Value 0.00 5391.00 6680.00 No registered group yet Registration of groups is continuous. A total of 5,391 FCAs have been registered across the states. FUGs Number Value 0.00 64043.00 111000.00 20% increase in new technology adopted in Fadama communities (disaggregated by technology, gender, vulnerable groups, age and farm size). No registered group yet Currently 64,043 FUGs have been registered across the states. Percentage Value 100.00 8.32 20.00 The index is 100 for the base year. This will be monitored annually over the project life 449 FCAs out of 5,391 (8.32%) registered have adopted new technology e.g Sawah Technology, floating fish feed, artificial The end project value of the index is 120 which is 20% increase in adoption rate of new technology Page 18 of 24

Livestock Percentage Agro forestry Percentage Crops Adoption Rate Percentage insemination, Bio-gas production and utilization Value 100.00 43.85 20.00 There is no value for the baseline but will be monitored annually throughout the project life 197 FCAs (43.88%) out of 449 have adopted new technology in livestock. Eg artificial insemination Value 0.00 14.92 20.00 There is no value for the baseline but will be monitored annually throughout the project life 67 (14.9%) FCAs out of 449 have adopted new technology in agro forestry. Enhanced activities on Agro forestry due to Up scaling of SLM practices Value 100.00 41.20 120.00 The index is 100 for the base year. The will be monitored annually over the project 185 (41.2%) FUGs out of 449 FUGs have adopted new technology e.g Sawah Technology 30% increase in the number if Fadama farmers Percentage Value 49.50 38.76 64.35 receiving extension services from ADPs (Disaggregated by gender and vulverable groups) 370,550 (38.76%) Fadama farmers out of the total 955,876 registered Farmers under Fadama III have so far received extension services from the ADPs. Disaggregation by vulnerable groups Percentage Value 0.00 19.45 20.00 72,045 Registered farmers receiving extension services are vulnerable. Disaggregation by Gender Percentage Value Increase in adoption of new technology in this area will be monitored annually but the target is not available on disaggregated basis Increase in adoption of new technology in this area will be monitored annually but the target is not available on disaggregated basis Increase in adoption of new technology in this area will be monitored annually but the target is not available on disaggregated basis Page 19 of 24

30% of FCAs have access to market information 20% increase in income from sales of value added agricultural products Male 204,271 (55.05%) Female 94,234 (25.40%) Percentage Value 0.00 58.34 30.00 3,145 out of 5,391 FCAs have access to market information. Percentage Value 0.00 37.32 20.00 This is disaggregated along the sub sectors Available record revealed that beneficiaries has realized 11,632,919.77 on the average as income from value addition to agricultural products compared to the 6,102,228.56 of income before value addition. Livestock Percentage Value 2.72 7.02 3.27 The estimated average income from value addition to livestock has increased by 7.02%. Fisheries Percentage Value 7.75 9.11 60.89 The estimated average income from value addition to Fisheries has increased by 9.11%. Crops Percentage Value 69.40 88.20 83.28 The estimated average income from value addition to crops is an average of 88.20%. 50% increase in the number of Fadama Percentage Value 0.00 42.33 50.00 farmers with access to agricultural inputs (disaggregated by gender and vulnerable groups) Baseline and end targets are 404,577 out of 955,876 Baseline and end targets are Registered Farmers are Page 20 of 24

In Organic fertilizer Percentage Agro-Chemicals Percentage Organic manure Percentage Improved Seeds Percentage entered for different disaggregated inputs. presently having access to agricultural inputs. entered for different disaggregated inputs Value 30.00 26.40 106,791 Fadama farmers out of 404,577 have access to inorganic manure. Value 30.00 18.83 50.00 This is the current baseline 76,201 Fadama farmers out data for access to input. of 404,577 have access to Agro- Chemicals. Value 14.31 19.54 50.00 This is the current baseline data for access to input. 79,062 Fadama farmers out of 404,577 have access to organic manure Value 24.25 35.22 50.00 This is the current baseline data for access to input. 142,523 Fadama farmers out of 404,577 have access to improved seed (80,801) and seedlings (61,722) 30% increase in the number of Fadama users Percentage Value 0.00 41.94 30.00 procuring rural advisory services in the 15-Jul-2008 participating communities (disaggregated by gender and vulnerable groups). 26,858 (41.94%) out of 64,0431 registered Fadama users have procured advisory services. The number of Fadama users procuring advisory services has increased as a result of increased tempo in disbursement across the participating states. Disaggregation by Vulnerable Group Percentage Value 13.56 0.00 15-Jul-2008 3,643 vulnerable groups have procured advisory services Page 21 of 24

Disaggregation by Gender Percentage 40% of participating Fadama Communities have at least one productive rural infrastrucutre constructed / rehabilitated (disaggregated by feeder raods, culverts/small bridges) Small Bridges Percentage Culverts Percentage Feeder Roads Percentage Value 0.00 15-Jul-2008 Male groups 6,583 (24.51%); Female groups 4443 (16.54%); Mixed 12,189 (45.38%) Percentage Value 0.00 53.64 40.00 No infrastructural project has been funded yet 2,892 (53.64%) FCAs out of 5,391 registered FCAs have at least 1 productive infrastructure. However there are new groups formed that are yet to acquire Assets or implement infrastructure subprojects. Value 0.00 2.10 No infrastructural project has been funded yet 65 small bridges bridges have been constructed. 63 FCAs out of 2,892 have at least one small bridge constructed. Value 0.00 7.30 No infrastructural project has been funded yet 400 culverts have been constructed. 210 FCAs out of 2,892 FCAs have at least one rural infrastructure constructed. By end of project at least 40% of the FCAs should have at least one infrastructural project Value 0.00 8.60 No infrastructural project has been funded yet 305 rural roads have been constructed/rehabilitated. 126 constructed and 179 feeder roads rehabilitated. 249 FCAs out of 2,892 FCAswith at least 1 rural infrastructure Page 22 of 24

By end of project, 20% of participating Local Government Authorities integrate Local Development Plans into their annual plans. By end of project, 75% of FUGs and FCAs have fully (100%) implemented approved LDPs By Mid Term Review, 75% of participating communities have Local Development Plans (LDPs) developed through a participatory process Percentage Value 0.00 55.18 20.00 CDD is still relatively new and no LGA is using such for LGA development planning. 685 LGAs are participating in the project and 378 LGAs (55.18%) have integrated LDPs in their annual work plan and budget (AWPB) Percentage Value 0.00 73.90 75.00 FCAs are just being established and no LDPs are yet to be prepared and implemented under the project. 4,567 LDPs have been approved. 1,192 LDPs are ongoing while 3,375 (73.90%) are fully implemented. Percentage Value 0.00 87.63 75.00 FCAs are just being established and no LDPs are yet prepared under the project 5,391 FCAs have been established with 4,724 LDPs prepared. 4,567 have been approved at various levels of implementation. 75% of all the projects reviewed and approved LDPs will be implemented. The project would meet this target before the end of the project. Data on Financial Performance (as of 20-Feb-2014) Financial Agreement(s) Key s Project Ln/Cr/Tf Status Approval Signing Effectiveness Original Closing Revised Closing P096572 IDA-44940 Effective 01-Jul-2008 24-Nov-2008 23-Mar-2009 31-Dec-2017 P096572 IDA-52930 Effective 28-Jun-2013 09-Sep-2013 21-Oct-2013 31-Dec-2017 31-Dec-2017 Disbursements (in Millions) Project Ln/Cr/Tf Status Currency Original Revised Cancelled Disbursed Undisbursed % Disbursed P096572 IDA-44940 Effective XDR 153.40 153.40 0.00 152.96 0.44 100.00 P096572 IDA-52930 Effective XDR 132.60 132.60 0.00 16.19 116.41 12.00 Disbursement Graph Page 23 of 24

Key Decisions Regarding Implementation The Additional Financing of the Project has been approved by the World Bank and the project closing date extended till 2017. The Project has taken commendable steps to ensure inclusive and equitable community participation at the FUG and FCA levels. Gender concerns are being addressed. Women are extensively benefiting from the project and are involved in decision making at different levels of governance. Gender participation on the project has reached a significant 44%. In addition, steps are being taken to strengthen the feedback loop between beneficiaries, facilitators and SFCOs through third party monitoring and use of ICT in Social Accountability. To enable this, hot lines have been established to allow beneficiaries to report to SFCOs in case of concern or complaint on sub-project implementation and work is on-going to pilot use of ICT to facilitate feedback process. High level advocacy visits to Governors and other top officials should continue in order to enlighten them on the benefits and guidelines of the project. Regular visits and technical assistance need to be undertaken by NFCO and SFCOs to improve the quality of sub-projects and reduce collusion at all levels. State Fadama offices are advised not to permit the use of project vehicles for personal and unofficial activities. Where payment of allowances is becoming a burden, states have been advised to either reduce number of facilitators or if necessary, be funded from counterpart funds. States have also been advised to address administrative, financial and capacity challenges slowing down the implementation of ESMPs and IPMs at the community, Local Government and State levels in collaboration with the World Bank. States will be brought into the additional financing of the project in phases. Therefore, state government should determine their area of comparative advantage in agricultural production and be ready to embrace the initiative of ATA when the programme starts in their various states. Restructuring History Level two Approved on 19-Mar-2012 Related Projects P130788-THIRD NATIONAL FADAMA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT - ADDITIONAL FINANCING Page 24 of 24