Realignment and Postrelease Community Supervision 2011 Implementation Plan RECOMMENDED TO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BY THE ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PARTNERSHIP October 18, 2011 1
AB 109 2011 Realignment Legislation Addressing Public Safety (Effective 7/1/11) Realigned responsibilities for adult felony offenders to counties Certain offenders released from state prison are subject to postrelease community supervision by board-designated agency Local community corrections partnership (CCP) to develop implementation plan Plan deemed accepted by county board unless rejected by 4/5 vote 2
ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PARTNERSHIP (OCCCP) Executive Committee of OCCCP voted on 9/29/11, to approve implementation plan OCCP Executive Committee: Chief Probation Officer (Chair) Presiding Judge of the Superior Court, or designee District Attorney Public Defender Sheriff Chief of Police Health Care Agency Director (Board-appointed 9/20/11) 3
POSTRELEASE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION (PCS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN GOALS Streamline additional responsibilities for maximum efficiency Use evidence-based best practices to reduce recidivism and maintain public safety Apply alternatives to pre-trial and post-conviction incarceration where appropriate 4
PCS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN OUTCOME MEASURES Recidivism rates for new populations Offenders sentenced to county jail and state prison Offenders sentenced to supervised release or alternative programs OCCCP collaborative feedback on effectiveness of mechanisms in place 5
First New Population Under Local Jurisdiction Persons released from prison on PCS instead of parole Non-violent, non-serious, non-high-risk sex offenders ( non-non-nons or N3s ) May have prior violent or serious offenses or be registered sex offenders not rated as high risk Estimated at 1,970 over time (includes 220 jailed for PCS violations) 6
SECOND NEW POPULATION UNDER LOCAL JURISDICTION Persons who have committed felonies, now sentenced to county jail instead of state prison No current or prior violent, serious or registerable sex offenses Estimated at 1,464 Court may order supervised release to Probation TOTAL OF 2 NEW POPULATIONS = 3,434 7
Projected PCS Releases October 2011 District 1-56 District 2-32 District 3-16 District 4-38 District 5-10 All Districts: Unsecured Housing- 30 Total 182 8
PCS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FUNDING Projected State funding = $25,734,096 for 10/1/11-6/30/12: $23,078,393 - Incarceration & supervision related services $ 200,000 $ 1,628,450 $ 827,253 $25,734,096 - One-time planning grant - Training & implementation - District Attorney and Public Defender representations 9
PCS RECOMMENDED SERVICE ALLOCATIONS Preliminary; can be adjusted as the true costs of PCS become known $13,616,251 - OC Sheriff $ 6,692,733 $ 2,077,055 $ 692,354 $23,078,393 - OC Probation - OC Health Care Agency - Municipal law enforcement 10
NEW PENAL CODE SECTIONS ADDED BY AB 109 Section 3450 Designated county PCS agency can impose intermediate sanctions: Home confinement with electronic monitoring GPS monitoring Section 3454 Designated county PCS agency can add electronic monitoring as an additional condition of supervision, when appropriate 11
PROPOSED BOARD RESOLUTION Authorize Chief Probation Officer as the administrator to provide: Home detention with electronic monitoring Electronic monitoring without home detention Reasons: Chief Probation Officer is the County Correctional Administrator for supervised electronic (home) confinement OC Probation is the designated County agency for PCS Implementation Plan as approved by OCCCP includes home detention and electronic monitoring for persons under PCS 12