U.S. District - Indiana Southern

US District Court Civil Docket as of 04/30/2001 Retrieved from the court on Thursday, August 21, 2003 U.S. District - Indiana Southern (Indianapolis) 1:99cv870 Sakhrani, Rajesh v. Brightpoint, Inc Date Filed: 06/11/1999 Assigned To: Judge Hamilton Referred To: Magistrate Godich Nature of suit: Securities (850) Cause: Securities/Commodities/Exchange Lead Docket: None Other Docket: None Jurisdiction: None Class Code: TERM 04/30/01 Closed: yes Statute: Jury Demand: Demand Amount: $0 NOS Description: Securities Sakhrani, Rajesh Plaintiff Litigants Attorneys Kevin J Yourman Weiss & Yourman 10940 Wilshire Boulevard 24TH Floor Los Angeles, CA 90024 (310)208-2800 Michael D Braun Stull Stull & Brody 10940 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 2300 Los Angeles, CA 90024 (310)209-2468 James A Knauer Kroger Gardis & Regas 111 Monument Circle #900 (317)692-9000 William C Potter II O1

Price Potter Jackson Waicukauski & Mellowitz 301 Massachusetts Ave (317)633-8787 Jagannath, Sitaraman Plaintiff Kevin J Yourman Weiss & Yourman 10940 Wilshire Boulevard 24TH Floor Los Angeles, CA 90024 (310)208-2800 Michael D Braun Stull Stull & Brody 10940 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 2300 Los Angeles, CA 90024 (310)209-2468 James A Knauer Kroger Gardis & Regas 111 Monument Circle #900 (317)692-9000 Brightpoint, Inc Defendant James H Ham III Baker & Daniels 300 North Meridian Street Suite 2700 (317)237-1256 Ira A Finkelstein Blank Rome Tenzer Greenblatt LLP The Chrysler Building 405 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10174

(212)885-5000 Laikin, Robert J Defendant James H Ham III Baker & Daniels 300 North Meridian Street Suite 2700 (317)237-1256 Ira A Finkelstein Blank Rome Tenzer Greenblatt LLP The Chrysler Building 405 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10174 (212)885-5000 Howell, J Mark Defendant James H Ham III Baker & Daniels 300 North Meridian Street Suite 2700 (317)237-1256 Ira A Finkelstein Blank Rome Tenzer Greenblatt LLP The Chrysler Building 405 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10174 (212)885-5000 Bounsall, Phillip A Defendant James H Ham III Baker & Daniels 300 North Meridian Street Suite 2700 (317)237-1256 Ira A Finkelstein

Blank Rome Tenzer Greenblatt LLP The Chrysler Building 405 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10174 (212)885-5000 Fivel, Steven E Defendant James H Ham III Baker & Daniels 300 North Meridian Street Suite 2700 (317)237-1256 Ira A Finkelstein Blank Rome Tenzer Greenblatt LLP The Chrysler Building 405 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10174 (212)885-5000 Date # Proceeding Text 06/11/1999 1 COMPLAINT - class action complaint for the violation of federal securities laws. eod 06/14/99 [PLM] 06/11/1999 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET eod 06/14/99 [PLM] 06/11/1999 3 RECEIPT #35794 $150.00 filing fee eod 06/14/99 [PLM] 06/11/1999 4 MAGISTRATE'S NOTICE eod 06/14/99 [PLM] 06/11/1999 5 SUMMONS issued eod 06/14/99 [PLM] 06/15/1999 6 RETURN of personal service dated 06/15/99 on Brightpoint, Inc. eod 06/15/99 [CEB] 06/15/1999 7 RETURN of personal service dated 06/15/99 on Robert J Laikin. eod 06/15/99 [CEB] 06/15/1999 8 RETURN of personal service dated 06/15/99 on J. Mark Howell. eod 06/15/99 [CEB] 06/15/1999 9 RETURN of personal service dated 06/15/99 on Phillip A. Bounsall. eod 06/15/99 [CEB] 06/15/1999 10 RETURN of personal service dated 06/15/99 on Steven E. Fivel. eod 06/15/99 [CEB] 06/15/1999 11 RECEIPT 35849 for $90.00 for three pro hac vice fees. PLTFS. eod 06/15/99 [CEB] 06/11/1999 12 RECEIPT #35795 for $30.00 for 1 pro hac vice fee. eod 06/16/99 [PLM] 06/11/1999 13 MOTION PRO HAC VICE for an order granting leave to Kevin J. Yourman, Vahn Alexander and Ronald T. Theda of Weiss & Yourman. Also, for leave of Michael D. Braun of Stull Stull & Brody to appear pro hac vice. c/s PLTFS eod 06/16/99 [PLM]

06/16/1999 14 ORDER grants leave to Kevin J. Yourman, Vahn Alexander and Ronald T. Theda of Weiss & Yourman of Los Angeles and Michael D. Braun of Stull Stull & Brody of Los Angeles to appear pro hac vice on behalf of plaintiffs. DFH cm eod 06/16/99 [CEB] 06/25/1999 15 MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE by Peter G. Tamulonis and John B. Drummy of Kightlinger & Gray as local counsel for plaintiffs. cs PLTFS. eod 06/28/99 [CEB] 06/28/1999 16 APPEARANCE of James H. Ham,III and Stacy L. Prall of Baker & Daniels on behalf of all defendants. cs DEFTS. eod 06/28/99 [CEB] 06/28/1999 17 APPEARANCE of James A. Knauer, William Bock, III and Brett R. Fleitz of Kroger, Gardis & Regas on behalf of all plaintiffs. cs PLTFS. eod 06/29/99 [CEB] 06/29/1999 18 ORDER grants the withdrawal of Peter Tamulonis and John Drummy of Kightlinger & Gray cm DFH eod 06/29/99 [CBU] 07/01/1999 19 NOTICE OF PARTIES' FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME until 08/02/99 for defendants to respond to complaint. cs DEFTS. eod 07/01/99 [CEB] 07/02/1999 20 ENTRY ASSIGNS P/T to 08/18/99 at 04:00PM Room 330 (DFH) c/m eod 07/02/99 [CEB] 07/22/1999 21 MOTION PRO HAC VICE by Ira A. Finkelstein and Harris N. Cogan of Tenzer Greenblatt LLP to appear for the defts. c/s DEFTS eod 07/23/99 [PLM] 07/22/1999 22 RECEIPT #36328 $60.00 - FILING FEE for 2 pro hac vice appearances. eod 07/23/99 [PLM] 07/23/1999 23 ORDER granting pro hac vice motion. DFH c/m eod 07/23/99 [PLM] 08/04/1999 24 MOTION FOR TIME TO respond to complaint. c/s DEFTS eod 08/04/99 [PLM] 08/05/1999 25 ORDER grants defendants until 09/01/99 to respond or otherwise answer complaint. DFH cm. eod 08/05/99 [CEB] 08/10/1999 26 MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE, TO APPOINT THE BRIGHTPOINT SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE GROUP AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS PURSUANT TO SECTION 21D(a)(3)(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, TO APPROVE LEAD PLAINTIFFS' CHOICE OF COUNSEL, AND FOR ORDER TO PRESERVE DOCUMENTS. cs. eod 08/10/99 [CEB] 08/10/1999 27 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE RELATED ACTIONS, APPOINT THE BRIGHTPOINT SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE GROUP AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS PURSUANT TO SECTION 21D(a)(3)(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, TO APPROVE LEAD PLAINTIFFS' CHOICE OF LEAD COUNSEL, AND FOR ORDER TO PRESERVE DOCUMENTS. cs eod 08/10/99 [CEB] 08/10/1999 28 DECLARATION OF ARTHUR L. SHINGLER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE, TO APPOINT THE BRIGHTPOINT SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE GROUP AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS PURSUANT TO SECTION 21D(a)(3)(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, TO APPROVE LEAD PLAINTIFFS' CHOICE OF COUNSEL, AND TO ORDER THE PRESERVATION OF DOCUMENTS. cs. eod 08/10/99 [CEB] 08/10/1999 29 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE eod 08/10/99 [CEB] 08/10/1999 30 NOTICE from the Sakhrani Group's of motion and motion for appointment of lead pltfs and lead counsel pursuant to Section 21D of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

for consolidataion of all related actions. eod 08/11/99 [PLM] 08/10/1999 -- MOTION for appointment of lead plaintiffs and lead counsel and Motion to consolidate all related actions. THE SAKHRANI GROUP eod 08/11/99 [PLM] 08/10/1999 31 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES in support of their Motion for Consolidation of all related actions and Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel pursuant to 21D(A)(3)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. eod 08/11/99 [PLM] 08/10/1999 32 DECLARATION of Vahn Alexander in support of the Sakhrani Group's motion for consolidation of all related actions and appointment of lead plaintiff and lead counsel pursuant to Section 21D(A)(3)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. eod 08/11/99 [PLM] 08/10/1999 33 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - the Declaration of Vaughan Alexander in support of the Sakhrani Groups Motion for consolidation of all related actons and appointment of lead pltf and lead counsel, and the Sakhrani Group's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support, were served on counsel on 8/10/99. KROGER GARDIS & REGAS eod 08/11/99 [PLM] 08/12/1999 34 JOINT MOTION for order continuing initial pretrial conference and extending certain deadlines. eod 08/13/99 [PLM] 08/12/1999 35 ORDER - initial pretrial conferences have been scheduled simultaneously for 08/18/99, at 4:00 p.m. in Cause Nos. IP 99-870-C, IP 99-943-C, and 99-1138-C. The Court now adds to that list the new DesRosiers case, IP 99-1157-C. It will not be necessary, however, for counsel to submit a proposed case management plan at that conference. The court anticipates that the conference will focus on the timing and manner for addressing issues concerning the selection of lead pltfs and lead counsel pursuant to the private Securities Litigation Reform Act. DFH c/m eod 08/13/99 [PLM] 08/16/1999 36 ENTRY RE: Joint Motion for order continuing initial pretrial conference and extending certain deadlines -- the court's order of August 12, 1999, resolves these matters and the conference remains scheduled on 8/18/99. DFH c/m eod 08/16/99 [PLM] 08/20/1999 37 ORDER on motions to consolidate, to select lead plaintiff(s), and to preserve documents and records. DFH c/m eod 08/20/99 [PLM] 08/20/1999 -- ORDER - on August 18, 1999, the court held a conference in these four related cases. The court now takes the following actions. eod 08/20/99 [PLM] 08/20/1999 -- ORDER that pursuant to FRCP 42, and without objection, these four actions are hereby consolidated for all purposes. This will be accomplished by having the lead plaintiff(s) file an amended, consolidated complaint in IP 99-870, and by closing administratively cause nos. 99-943, 99-1138 and 99-1157, all of which will be done after the selection of the lead plaintiff(s). For now, however, all future filings should use only Cause No. IP 99-870-C. eod 08/20/99 [PLM] 08/20/1999 -- ORDER - there is dispute over the selection of the lead plaintiff(s). The Desrosiers pltfs shall file no later than 8/25/99, their opposition to the Sakhrani pltfs' motion to be designated lead pltfs. The Desrosiers pltfs have leave to conduct a brief deposition related to the motion. The Sakhrani pltfs shall file any reply no later than 9/1/99 and may also conduct narrow focused, and expedited discovery concerning the Desrosiers pltfs. The court will hold a hearing on selection of lead plaintiff(s). eod 08/20/99 [PLM] 08/20/1999 -- ORDER ASSIGNS HEARING to 09/10/99 at 03:00PM Room 344 (DFH) c/m for

hearing on selection of lead plaintiff(s) and lead counsel. eod 08/20/99 [PLM] 08/20/1999 -- ORDER that defendants need not resond to any of the pending complaints in these actions, but shall respond timely to a consolidated amended complaint after the selected lead plaintiff(s) file it. DFH c/m eod 08/20/99 [PLM] 08/25/1999 38 OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL AND SUBMISSION OF AUTHORITIES. cs DEFTS. eod 08/25/99 [CEB] 08/25/1999 39 APPEARANCE of William C. Potter of Price, Potter & Mellowitz on behalf of plaintiffs. cs eod 08/26/99 [CEB] 08/25/1999 40 THE BRIGHTPOINT SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE GROUP'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL. cs. eod 08/26/99 [CEB] 08/25/1999 41 JOINDER OF CERTAIN CLASSMEMBERS OF (1) THE MOTION TO APPOINT THE BRIGHTPOINT SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE GROUP AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS PURSUANT TO SECTION 21D(a)(3)(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND TO APPROVE LEAD PLAINTIFFS' CHOICE OF LEAD COUNSEL; AND (2) THE BRIGHTPOINT SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE GROUP'S OPPOSITION TO THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND COUNSEL. cs. eod 08/26/99 [CEB] 08/25/1999 42 DECLARATION OF WILLIAM C. POTTER,II, IN SUPPORT OF THE BRIGHTPOINT SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE GROUP'S OPPOSITION TO THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL. cs. eod 08/26/99 [CEB] 08/27/1999 43 MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE with court order. LYNN DESROSIERS eod 08/27/99 [PLM] 08/27/1999 44 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for document #43. eod 08/27/99 [PLM] 09/01/1999 45 THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND CO-LEAD COUNSEL PURSUANT TO SECTION 21D(A)(3)(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. cs. eod 09/01/99 [CEB] 09/01/1999 46 DECLARATION OF JAMES A. KNAUER IN SUPPORT OF THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL PURSUANT TO SECTION 21D(A)(3)(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. eod 09/01/99 [CEB] 09/01/1999 47 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for Docket Nos. 45 and 46. cs. eod 09/01/99 [CEB] 09/02/1999 48 DECLARATION - supplemental declaration of Vahn Alexander in support of the Sakhrani Group's motion for appointment of lead pltf and lead counsel. c/s eod 09/02/99 [PLM] 09/03/1999 49 MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE BRIGHTPOINT REPRESENTATIVE SHAREHOLDER GROUP'S MOTION TO COMPEL. PLTF Sakhrani Group. eod 09/03/99 [CEB] 09/03/1999 50 DECLARATION OF WILLIAM A. LAWRENCE (on behalf of L.A.L.W., Inc.). PLTF Sakhrani Group. eod 09/03/99 [CEB]

09/03/1999 51 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for Docket Nos. 49 and 50. cs PLTF Sakhrani Group. eod 09/03/99 [CEB] 09/03/1999 52 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER, AND, SEPARATELY, MOTION TO STRIKE THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND LEAD COUNSEL. PLTF Brightpoint Group. eod 09/03/99 [CEB] 09/03/1999 53 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for Docket No. 52. cs. PLTF Brightpoint Group. eod 09/03/99 [CEB] 09/10/1999 54 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF SUPPORT FOR SAKHRANI GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND LEAD COUNSEL. cs Gertrude Sendermair, plaintiff in Cause No. IP-99-C-1138. eod 09/10/99 [CEB] 09/10/1999 55 COURTROOM MINUTES -Arguments were presented on the competing motions for the appointment of lead plaintiffs and lead counsel filed by the Brightpoint Group and the Sakhrani Group and on the Motion to Strike the Sakhrani Group's Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel filed by the Brightpoint Group; The Brightpoint Group and the Sakhrani Group were represented by counsel; the Brightpoint Defendants were represented by their representative and by counsel. At the conclusion of the arguments, the Court directed the Brightp[oint Group and the Sakhrani Group to submit certain specific additional information before 10/01/99, with any responses due by 10/08/99. DFH. Ct. Reporter K. Andrews. eod 09/10/99 [CEB] 09/14/1999 56 CT REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING FROM 09/10/99 (court reporter Kathleen Andrews, 1 volume) eod 09/14/99 [PLM] 10/01/1999 57 BRIGHTPOINT SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE GROUP'S SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION OF CLASSMEMBER STATEMENTS. cs. eod 10/01/99 [CEB] 10/01/1999 58 DECLARATION OF RAJESH SAKHRANI IN SUPPORT OF THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL. eod 10/01/99 [CEB] 10/01/1999 59 DECLARATION OF SITARAMAN JAGANNATH IN SUPPORT OF THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL. eod 10/01/99 [CEB] 10/01/1999 60 DECLARATION OF JACK CLARK IN SUPPORT OF THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL. eod 10/01/99 [CEB] 10/01/1999 61 DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF JOHN KILCOYNE IN SUPPORT OF THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND APPOINTMENT OF LEAD COUNSEL. eod 10/01/99 [CEB] 10/01/1999 62 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF VAHN ALEXANDER IN SUPPORT OF THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL. eod 10/01/99 [CEB] 10/01/1999 63 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for Docket Nos. 58-62. cs. eod 10/01/99 [CEB] 10/01/1999 64 SUPPLEMENTAL FILING BY WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLP IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF THE SAKHRANI GROUP AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND FOR APPROVAL OF THEIR SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL. cs. eod 10/01/99 [CEB]

10/06/1999 65 BRIGHTPOINT SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE GROUP'S SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL CLASSMEMBER STATEMENTS. cs. eod 10/06/99 [CEB] 10/08/1999 66 THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S RESPONSE to the Brightpoint Shareholder representative Group's supplemental submission of class member statements. c/s SAKHRANI GROUP eod 10/12/99 [PLM] 10/08/1999 67 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE RE: DOCUMENT #66. eod 10/12/99 [PLM] 10/08/1999 68 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM in opposition to the Sakhrani Group's motion for appt of lead pltf and lead counsel. c/s BRIGHTPOINT SHAREHOLDER eod 10/12/99 [PLM] 10/08/1999 69 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re: DOCUMENT #68 eod 10/12/99 [PLM] 10/08/1999 70 DECLARATION of William C. Potter, II, in support of Brightpoint Shareholder representative group's supplemental memorandum in opposition to the Sakhrani Group's motion for appt of lead pltf and lead counsel. c/s BRIGHTPOINT eod 10/12/99 [PLM] 10/13/1999 71 THE BRIGHTPOINT SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE GROUP'S FURTHER SUPPLEMENTAL LODGEMENT OF RECENTLY RECEIVED EVIDENCE IN OPPOSITION TO THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND LEAD COUNSEL. cs. eod 10/13/99 [CEB] 10/20/1999 72 THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S OBJECTIONS TO THE BRIGHTPOINT SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE GROUP'S:(1) SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL CLASSMEMBER STATEMENTS;(2) SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL; AND (3) FURTHER SUPPLEMENTAL LODGEMENT OF RECENTLY RECEIVED EVIDENCE IN OPPOSITION TO THE SAKHRANI GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND LEAD COUNSEL. cs. eod 10/20/99 [CEB] 11/12/1999 73 SUBMISSION of supplemental authority on pltfs' motions for appt of lead plaintiff. c/s DEFTS eod 11/12/99 [PLM] 11/18/1999 74 SECOND SUBMISSION OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF. cs. DEFTS. eod 11/18/99 [CEB] 12/08/1999 75 ENTRY ON MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND APPOINTING COUNSEL FOR PUTATIVE CLASS - John Kilcoyne named as lead plaintiff; the firms of Weiss & Yourman and Stull Stull & Brody named as lead counsel; the firm of Kroger Gardis & Regas named as local counsel; plaintiff Kilcoyne to file an amended complaint for these consolidated actions no later than 01/10/00; defendants to respond to amended complaint no later than 30 days after it is filed; all pending motions in these consolidated actions are denied as moot; Cause Nos. IP 99-943-C, IP 99-1138-C, and IP 99-1157-C are administratively closed, and this matter will proceed as Cause No. IP 99-870-C. DFH c/m. eod 12/08/99 [CEB] 01/10/2000 76 AMENDED COMPLAINT (CONSOLIDATED); and eod 01/10/00 [PLM] 01/10/2000 -- DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL - PLTFS eod 01/10/00 [PLM] 01/10/2000 77 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re: Consolidated Amended Complaint filed this date. eod 01/10/00 [PLM]

02/09/2000 78 MOTION TO DISMISS THE CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT. c/s. DEFTS. eod 02/09/00 [CEB] 02/09/2000 79 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS. c/s. DEFTS. eod 02/09/00 [CEB] 02/09/2000 80 APPENDIX OF EXHIBITS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. c/s. DEFTS. eod 02/09/00 [CEB] 02/11/2000 81 STIPULATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. eod 02/11/00 [CEB] 02/14/2000 82 ORDER approves Stipulated Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss-- plaintiffs' response due by 03/10/00; defendants'reply due by 03/31/00. DFH. c/m. eod 02/14/00 [CEB] 02/18/2000 83 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF NAME OF Tenzer Greenblatt LLP to Blank Rome Tenzer LLP. c/s.\ eod 02/18/00 [CEB] 03/10/2000 84 PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS. eod 03/10/00 [CEB] 03/10/2000 85 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for Document # 84. PLTFS eod 03/10/00 [CEB] 03/27/2000 86 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re: Compendium of nonreported decisions cited in pltfs' opposition to defts' motion to dismiss consolidated amended complaint. eod 03/27/00 [PLM] 03/31/2000 87 DEFENDANTS' REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS THE CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS. c/s DEFTS eod 03/31/00 [CEB] 04/03/2000 88 APPEARANCE of Catherine A. Meeker of law firm Baker & Daniels on behalf of defts c/s - DEFTS eod 04/03/00 [MAC] 03/29/2001 89 ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS -- The complaint is dismissed. If no motion for leave to file an amended complaint is filed by 4/26/01, the court will enter final judgment dismissing the consolidated case. DFH c/m eod 03/29/01 [PLM] 03/29/2001 -- OBV 47 PG 273 eod 03/29/01 [PLM] 04/30/2001 90 CLOSED Judgment - the court having granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint on March 29, 2001, and having allowed plaintiffs until April 26, 2001, to seek leave to file a further amended complaint, and plaintiffs having filed no such motion, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that palintiffs Rajesh Sakhrani, John Kilcoyne, Jack Clark, Sitaraman Jagannath, and all other named plaintiffs take nothing by their complaint against defendants Brightpoint, Inc.; Robert J. Laikin, J. Mark Howell, Phillip A. Bounsall, and Steven E. Fivel, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. DFH c/m OBV 47 PG 385 eod 04/30/01 [CEB]