Public Involvement. This appendix includes: 1. Public Involvement Summary 2. Public Outreach Documentation 3. Public Survey Summary Results

Similar documents
APPENDIX D PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION PROGRESS REPORT. Hillsborough County Local Mitigation Strategy Appendix D-1

NC Department of Public Safety Emergency Management. NCEM Overview & Response To Man-Made Hazards. Mike Sprayberry, Director 29 November 2016

Section 3. LMS Team Organization and Operating Procedures

Emergency Preparedness Planning and Implementation (EPPI) Study Guide

City of Dallas Emergency Management Overview. Public Safety Committee December 12, 2011

CHATHAM COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

Office of the City Auditor. Committed to increasing government efficiency, effectiveness, accountability and transparency

DURHAM / DURHAM COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

DELAWARE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN RISK REDUCTION

Emergency and Disaster Preparedness College/Division Business Administrators. Emergency Management Bureau

ANNEX R SEARCH & RESCUE

TOWN OF ST. JAMES NORTH CAROLINA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

ECONOMIC DISASTER PLANNING AND RECOVERY

BLINN COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS MANUAL

Table 1: Types of Emergencies Potentially Affecting Urgent Care Centers o Chemical Emergency

A Training Program for Child Care Centers. Disaster Preparation. Developed by the National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies

CEMP Criteria for Ambulatory Surgery Centers Emergency Management

OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ANNUAL REPORT

Matthew Hewings, Operations Director. Mississippi Emergency Management Agency. Office of Response 03/02/17

Duties & Responsibilities of the EMC

Emergency Preparedness: Preserving Your Life s Work

Emergency Management. 1 of 8 Updated: June 20, 2014 Hospice with Residential Facilities

COUNTY OF LYCOMING EMA QUARTERLY TRAINING (Emergency Management Coordinators serving the municipalities of Lycoming County)

After Action Report / Improvement Plan. After Action Report Improvement Plan

PREPARE: Kansas. Introduction Module Appendices

The 2018 edition is under review and will be available in the near future. G.M. Janowski Associate Provost 21-Mar-18

ALASKA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN

HURRICANE EVACUATION AND POST-HURRICANE SITE LOCATIONS FOR STAGING OF VARIOUS HELP ORGANIZATIONS

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS POLICY

Emergency Support Function (ESF) # 18 Business Continuity. Concept of Operations

MAHONING COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN DISTRICT BOARD OF HEALTH MAHONING COUNTY YOUNGSTOWN CITY HEALTH DISTRICT

EOC Procedures/Annexes/Checklists

State Warning Point. Dawn Irving State Warning Point Manager Florida Division of Emergency Management

Disaster Preparedness

Hernando County Emergency Management Strategic Plan

Hazard Mitigation Assistance

King County Flood Control District 2017 Work Program

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Incident Planning Guide Tornado Page 1

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING CRITERIA FOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES

2015 Emergency Management and Preparedness Final Report

Department of Elder Affairs Programs and Services Handbook Chapter 8: Emergency Management and Disaster Preparedness CHAPTER 8

School Vulnerability Assessment

Harvey Storm Update. Situation. Key Tasks for the Staff Recommendations. Current weather update Events schedule on campus

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING CRITERIA FOR ADULT DAY CARE FACILITIES

OSHA s Roles and Activities in Protecting the Safety and Health of Workers during Disaster Response

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING CRITERIA FOR HOSPITALS

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FOR NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS

CEMP Criteria for Adult Day Care Centers Emergency Management

PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

CERT Training Empowering Citizens to Prepare for and Respond to Disasters & Emergencies

ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES STATUE RULE CRITERIA

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT BASIC PLAN

3 rd Annual NCEM Hurricane Conference

HOME GUIDE TO EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS for Seniors and People with Disabilities

VERMONT S RESILIENCE PROGRESS REPORT ROADMAP. August 20, 2015 BACKGROUND WHAT IS RESILIENCE? TRACKING OUR PROGRESS.

City of Pasadena Office of Emergency Management 2014 Annual Report

Public Involvement Plan

TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN ANNEX R EARTHQUAKE & TSUNAMI

HOUSE OF WORSHIP Mitigation & Preparedness

BUSINESS SERVICES VP EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT CHAPTER #2 Board of Trustees Approval: 8/13/2014 POLICY Page 1 of 1

Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT)

New Hanover County Schools. Emergency Operations Plan. Summary (January, 2013)

MAPLE LEAF GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB HURRICANE PREPAREDNESS PLAN

Board of Commissioners. County Administration. Charlotte Nash Chairman. Lynette Howard District 2. Jace Brooks District 1. John Heard District 4

Mississippi Emergency Support Function #15 - External Affairs Annex

What U.S. Habitat affiliates and state support organizations need to know

Part V - The Planning Process and Public Participation. Table of Contents

CSB Policy and Procedures

CHAPTER 2 PLANNING PROCESS

Kanawha Putnam Emergency Management Plan Functional Annex. (completed by plan authors) Local / County Office of Emergency Management

Yolo Operational Area Oil & Hazardous Materials Response Executive Summary

Chapter 5 Becoming an Emergency Management Professional

Emergency Operations Plan

Emergency Support Function # 2 Communications

Hurricane Preparedness Brief. 6th Civil Engineer Squadron Office of Emergency Management

By Rmhermen at en.wikipedia (photo by rmhermen) [GFDL ( or CC-BY-SA-3.0

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER FORMS

Pets & Disasters: Identifying Community Needs & Resources

2014 VMT REPORT NCDOT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DIVISION

NEW DISASTER PLANNING REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS: ARE YOU PREPARED?

Chapter 1 - History and Current Status of Emergency Management

A PUBLIC HEALTH GUIDE TO EMERGENCY PLANNING

NYS Emergency Management Training Program. Emergency Management in New York State

Emergency Preparedness: Here Comes Hurricane Season!

Ready? Is Your. Family. Dear neighbors,

City of Richmond Emergency Operations Plan (EOP)

On the Brink of Disaster: How the Rhode Island Department of Health Prepares for and Responds to Public Health Emergencies

STATE EMERGENCY FUNCTION (SEF) 10 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. I. Lead Agency: Colorado Department of Public Safety (CDPS), Colorado State Patrol (CSP).

RENAL NETWORK 11 MOCK DRILL INSTRUCTIONS

ESF 14 - Long-Term Community Recovery

Primary Agency. Support Agencies. I. Introduction. Pacific County Fire District # 1 (PCFD1)

Hurricane Preparedness

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Emergency Response Plan Western New England University

What is MITIGATION? An action that reduces or eliminates long-term risk to people and property from natural hazards and their effects.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Emergency Services in the Greater Amherst Area

Commander Naval Forces/Navy Region Japan RDML Greg Fenton Emergency Evacuation Program (EEP) Brief. Forward Engaged Ready UNCLASSIFIED

Transcription:

Appendix F Public Involvement This appendix includes: 1. Public Involvement Summary 2. Public Outreach Documentation 3. Public Survey Summary Results

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY Stakeholders outside of participating local government staff and officials were alerted to the planning process and invited to participate in several ways. There was publicity of the project kickoff meeting, a Public Survey, extensive recruitment for the project Coordinating Committee, and an online Project Wiki. Outreach Prior to Project Kickoff Meeting The project kickoff meeting (held November 21, 2013) was widely publicized on local government online calendars and newsletters as well as in the in Triangle J Council of Governments (TJCOG) weekly newsletter (distribution of 1,718 Triangle-wide). A press release was sent to the two major newspapers in Wake County, the Raleigh News & Observer and the Raleigh Public Record. A Public Notice was published about the process and the kickoff meeting in the News & Observer. Staff of participating local governments also disseminated the Public Notice through local channels (e-blasts, Facebook, Twitter, public information officers, official government websites, online event calendars, etc.) as well as to numerous local government departments not already involved in the planning effort. Local staff were also asked to personally forward the meeting announcement to local advisory boards and committees as well as at least 3 community leaders NOT affiliated with their local government, such as nonprofit organizations, social services agencies/affordable housing advocates, grade schools/ptas/high schools, academia (NCSU, Wake Tech), Cooperative Extension, business/industry, State and Federal agencies, cultural institutions, Capital Area MPO Technical Advisory and Technical Coordinating Committees, HOAs and property managers, neighborhood groups, CERTs, religious institutions, special populations (ESL, elder care), etc. The following stakeholders and organizations were invited to the kickoff meeting by Triangle J Council of Governments by direct personal email: NC State and Wake County Cooperative Extension Red Cross Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) staff US Army Corps of Engineers (operator of Falls Lake) Director of Public Health for Wake County Director of Senior & Adult Services in Wake Human Services Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Coordinators with the City of Raleigh, Triangle Transit, Wake Technical Community College, RTP, and NCSU. These entities were also provided a links to online the Public Survey, Word files of the Survey in English and Spanish, and links to the online Project Wiki. Additional Outreach After the kickoff meeting, Triangle J Council of Governments continued to identify and contact additional stakeholders to invite them participate. The following stakeholders were also contacted to help disseminate and to take the Public Survey; to submit a point of contact for the Coordinating

Committee; and invited to visit the Project Wiki with draft Plan components, information about the process, and contact information for each participating local government. Elementary and middle school facilities managers Raleigh-Wake Chamber of Commerce Wake County s five active Community Emergency Response Teams 1 The Downtown Raleigh Alliance (a nonprofit network of property owners, government officials, and business owners) Raleigh-Durham Authority (the entity responsible for management of the Triangle region s international airport) Duke Energy Alliance for Disability Advocates Large employers NC State University, Shaw University, Campbell University, Meredith College, Peace College, and Wake Technical Community College The Public Survey was posted to the online project wiki as well as to participating local government websites, e-blasts, and social media. Triangle J Council of Governments also sent the Public Survey link and Word documents in English and in Spanish in a personal email to the following people and organizations requesting dissemination to their networks: Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department El Pueblo Club Choice The Red Cross of Wake County The following organizations were especially involved in disseminating the Public Survey: Millbrook Human Services Center distributed hard copies in both English and Spanish directly to their clients Alianza Latina Pro-Educación en Salud (ALPES) of Wake County put a survey announcement in their newsletter (>100 recipients) and offered to distribute the Word version in English and Spanish Rogelio Valencia, Latino Ombudsman with the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services and the State Emergency Response Team Privacy/Repatriation Coordinator (Division of Social Services) posted survey links, Word files, and announcements to his networks and listserv The Wake County Alliance for Disability Advocates included survey announcement in their newsletters and posted survey links to website and Facebook. They also provided a service to input survey responses for anyone unable to use the survey form. Also, WRAL television news anchor Bill Leslie reported on the Hazard Mitigation Plan and the Public Survey on February 17, 2014. He also informed viewers that the survey was available on the station's website; it was posted online with a brief summary of the process. 1 Contact information for Wake County CERT leads obtained from Ms. Patty Moore at the NC Department of Public Safety. TJCOG sent the invitation to participate on the Coordinating Committee and survey information to the five CERT leads and asked them to forward the email to the rest of their CERT members. Eight CERT members volunteered to participate on the Coordinating Committee.

Hazard Mitigation Planning http://www.wakegov.com/em/hmp/pages/default.aspx Page 1 of 1 2/17/2014 Hazard Mitigation Planning The county, along with local jurisdictions and other partners, are working to prepare a multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. This Plan will identify and assess our community's natural hazard risks and determine how to best minimize or manage those risks. Your participation is important to us! Please take our survey, which is an opportunity for you to share your opinions and participate in the mitigation planning process. The information you provide will help us better understand your hazard concerns and can lead to mitigation activities that should help lessen the impacts of future hazard events. Please help us by completing this survey by March 30, 2014. If you have any questions regarding this survey or would like to learn about more ways you can participate in the development of the Wake County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, please contact Atkins, planning consultant for the project. You may reach Nathan Slaughter (Atkins) at 919-431-5251 or by email at nathan.slaughter@atkinsglobal.com. Learn more about this project. Published by Chris H. Smith on Friday, February 14, 2014.

Wake County Hazard Mitigation Plan Public Survey Results April 21, 2014

Public Survey Provides an opportunity for the public to share opinions and participate in the planning process Link to survey posted on County and municipal websites WRAL news brief 494 completed surveys received 5 were Spanish-translated surveys

Public Survey Highlights 87% of respondents are interested in making their homes more resistant to hazards 43% have already taken action to make their homes more hazard resistant 74% do not who to contact regarding risk reduction

1. Where do you live? 200 180 160 182 Unincorporated Wake County Apex Cary 140 120 100 Fuquay-Varina Garner Holly Springs Knightdale Morrisville 80 60 40 20 0 46 48 38 24 39 21 28 11 3 # of Responses 29 5 2 18 Raleigh Rolesville Wake Forest Wendell Zebulon Other

2. Have you experienced a disaster? 47.1% Yes 53.0% No

2. Examples of disasters experienced 3.8% 4.8% Earthquake 9.3% Flood Hurricane 1.3% 21.2% 15.4% 40.1% Landslide Severe Storm / Wind / Hail / Lightning Tornado Wildfire Winter / Ice Storm 3.8% 0.5% Other

3. How concerned about possibility of disaster? 13.2% 23.8% Extremely Concerned Somewhat Concerned Not Concerned 62.9%

4. Highest hazard threat? 140 129 120 110 Hurricane / Tropical Storm 100 80 88 Severe Thunderstorm / High Wind Tornado 60 40 20 60 35 23 Severe Winter Storm / Freeze HAZMAT Incident Flood 0 # of Responses

5. Second highest hazard threat? 120 100 98 96 96 Severe Thunderstorm / High Wind Hurricane / Tropical Storm 80 74 Tornado 60 Severe Winter Storm / Freeze 40 Flood 20 25 25 22 HAZMAT Incident Lightning 0 # of Responses

6. Other hazards not listed? Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant Bioterrorism / Terrorism / Shooting Burglary / Crime / Rioting Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear (CBRN) Climate Change Fracking / Water Contamination / Pollution Electromagnetic Pulse / Solar Storm Plane Crash Power Outage / Failure Train Derailment Traffic Downed Trees Leaking Landfill

7. Is your home in a FEMA floodplain? 2.1% 31.5% Yes No I don't know 66.4%

8. Do you have flood insurance? 11.3% 8.8% Yes No I don't know 79.9%

8. Why no flood insurance? 9.7% 4.7% Not located in floodplain I rent 8.2% 3.2% 3.0% 17.5% 53.6% Too expensive Not necessary: it never floods Not necessary: elevated or otherwise protected Never really considered it Other

9. Taken action to be more hazard resistant? 57.2% 42.8% Yes No

9. Examples of actions taken 4.5% 7.7% Alerts / Warning Debris / Tree Removal Drainage 58.6% 18.5% 2.7% 6.8% 5.4% 0.5% 3.2% Education / Training Erosion / Landslide Control House Retrofit / Repair Insurance Preparedness / Emergency Planning Other

10. Interested in being more hazard resistant? 13.1% Yes No 86.9%

11. Know who to contact for reducing risks? 26.2% Yes No 73.8%

12. Most effective way to receive information? 0.4% 5.1% 4.7% 5.3% 7.3% 6.2% 1.8% 12.6% 0.4% Newspaper Television advertising Television programs Radio advertising Radio programs Internet Email 29.7% 26.4% Mail Public workshops / meetings School Meetings Other

12. Other ways to receive information CERT team / training Twitter Cell phone / text message In person Audio recording / Braille FEMA / Local EM websites Local news NOAA weather radio Professional organizations Water bill newsletter Town communications Information packet

13. Steps local gov t could take to reduce risk 7.9% 0.6% 3.7% Alert / Warning / Notification System Climate Change Adaptation Shelters Tree / Limb Removal 26.4% 9.0% Improve Drainge / Debris Removal / Flood Control Evacuation 5.3% 3.7% Funding Hazard / Risk Assessment Insurance 13.2% 10.7% 5.6% 6.5% 2.0% 4.5% 1.1% Planning / Regulations Response / Recovery Improve / Retrofit Infrastructure Preparedness / Emergency Planning Pubilc Education / Awareness

14. Other issues regarding risk and loss 3.8% 2.9% Education / Awareness 2.9% 4.8% 21.0% 6.7% 5.7% 9.5% 2.9% 4.8% 2.9% 7.6% 11.4% 1.9% 5.7% 2.9% 2.9% Alert / Warning / Notification System Debris / Tree Removal Drainage / Flooding Evacuation Shelters Hazardous Materials Nuclear Hazards Manmade Hazards Transportation / Connectivity / Traffic Preparedness Response / Recovery School / Work Closures Funding / Resources Power Outages Infrastructre Vulnerable Populations

15. Mitigation Actions: Prevention 3.3% 19.2% Very important Somewhat important Not important 78.0%

15. Mitigation Actions: Property Protection 10.1% 44.3% 46.1% Very important Somewhat important Not important

15. Mitigation Actions: Natural Resource Protection 5.3% 29.8% 66.2% Very important Somewhat important Not important

15. Mitigation Actions: Structural Projects 5.7% 38.3% 56.8% Very important Somewhat important Not important

15. Mitigation Actions: Emergency Services 1.3% 8.9% Very important Somewhat important Not important 89.9%

15. Mitigation Actions: Public Education & Awareness 2.0% 23.7% 74.5% Very important Somewhat important Not important

15. Mitigation Actions: Summary Highest importance Emergency Services Prevention Moderate importance Public Education & Awareness Natural Resource Protection Lowest importance Structural Projects Property Protection

Wake County Hazard Mitigation Plan Public Survey Results April 21, 2014