Colorado Community College System ACADEMIC YEAR NEED-BASED FINANCIAL AID APPLICANT DEMOGRAPHICS BASED ON 9 MONTH EFC

Similar documents
Colorado Community College System ACADEMIC YEAR NEED-BASED FINANCIAL AID APPLICANT DEMOGRAPHICS BASED ON 9 MONTH EFC

Colorado Community College System ACADEMIC YEAR NEED-BASED FINANCIAL AID APPLICANT DEMOGRAPHICS BASED ON 9 MONTH EFC

Student Right-To-Know Graduation Rates

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM YEAR 2016/17

Program and Discipline Improvement Process Computer Science

Demographic Profile of the Active-Duty Warrant Officer Corps September 2008 Snapshot

Appendix A Registered Nurse Nonresponse Analyses and Sample Weighting

Demographic Profile of the Officer, Enlisted, and Warrant Officer Populations of the National Guard September 2008 Snapshot

The Prior Service Recruiting Pool for National Guard and Reserve Selected Reserve (SelRes) Enlisted Personnel

DoDEA Seniors Postsecondary Plans and Scholarships SY

Population Representation in the Military Services

Pell Grant Information Page

Licensed Nurses in Florida: Trends and Longitudinal Analysis

Officer Retention Rates Across the Services by Gender and Race/Ethnicity

College of Lake County Children s Learning Center Child Care Access Means Parents in School CCAMPIS Grant Application (Please print or type)

Identifying and Describing Nursing Faculty Workload Issues: A Looming Faculty Shortage

Impact of Scholarships

School of Public Health University at Albany, State University of New York

Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust Summary of Equality Monitoring Analyses of Service Users. April 2015 to March 2016

Reenlistment Rates Across the Services by Gender and Race/Ethnicity

Status Report. on the. Pell Grant Program AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS

Physician Workforce Fact Sheet 2016

Pathways to Nursing Success Program

KEY FINDINGS from Caregiving in the U.S. National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP. April Funded by MetLife Foundation

Minnesota State Colleges & Universities Fact Book

2016 FULL GRANTMAKER SALARY AND BENEFITS REPORT

2016 Survey of Michigan Nurses

PLEASE BE AWARE THAT YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SAVE YOUR PROGRESS, SO PLEASE PREPARE ALL OF YOUR ANSWERS AND UPLOADABLE FILES IN ADVANCE.

CER Module ACCESS TO CARE January 14, AM 12:30 PM

Summary of Findings. Data Memo. John B. Horrigan, Associate Director for Research Aaron Smith, Research Specialist

Primary Care Workforce Survey Scotland 2017

Standards for Success ROSS Data Elements

Dobson DaVanzo & Associates, LLC Vienna, VA

AJL Reporting User Guide

Cite as: LeVasseur, S.A. (2015) Nursing Education Programs Hawai i State Center for Nursing, University of Hawai i at Mānoa, Honolulu.

STUDENT FINANCIAL AFFAIRS. Fact Book

South Carolina Nursing Education Programs August, 2015 July 2016

STATE OF CONNECTICUT Office of Higher Education

Research Brief IUPUI Staff Survey. June 2000 Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Vol. 7, No. 1

2005 Survey of Licensed Registered Nurses in Nevada

2017 NCLEX-PN Test Plan Overview. Kristin Singer, MSN, RN RN Test Development Associate, Examinations

Undergraduate Financial Aid: Changes in Funding Trends & Changes in Financial Aid Policies

Minnesota s Physical Therapist Assistant Workforce, 2015

PLEASE BE AWARE THAT YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SAVE YOUR PROGRESS, SO PLEASE PREPARE ALL OF YOUR ANSWERS AND UPLOADABLE FILES IN ADVANCE.

BROWARD COUNTY TRANSIT MAJOR SERVICE CHANGE TO 595 EXPRESS SUNRISE - FORT LAUDERDALE. A Title VI Service Equity Analysis

The following documents need to be submitted in addition to the attached application form:

The Impact of Scholarships on Student Performance

UNIVERSITY CITY FIRE & RESCUE DEPARTMENT (UCFR)

Marymount University

Minnesota s Physician Workforce, 2015

Employee Headcount Trends by UAA Administrative Unit, Fall All Employees

REPORT ON AMERICA S SMALL BUSINESSES

Students Experiencing Homelessness in Washington s K-12 Public Schools Trends, Characteristics and Academic Outcomes.

2017 CAHPS Child Medicaid Survey Summary Report

The University of Mississippi Office of Financial Aid University, MS Phone: (800) Fax: (662)

2015 All-Campus Career Fair Student Survey

The Robert Noyce Scholarship Program for Mathematics Teaching

2017 Florida Center for Nursing Survey of Nursing Programs

Physical Therapy Assistant Occupation Overview

UNIVERSITY CITY FIRE & RESCUE DEPARTMENT (UCFR)

Community Care Statistics : Referrals, Assessments and Packages of Care for Adults, England

WikiLeaks Document Release

Salary and Demographic Survey Results

Status Report. Pell Grant

2018 Geriatric Oncology: Educating Nurses to Improve Quality Care

Summary Report of Findings and Recommendations

Scottish social services sector: report on 2010 workforce data

City of Jacksonville Office of Economic Development. Equal Business Opportunity (EBO) and Contract Compliance Office. 4th Quarter Report for FY 12

HOW FIU SPENDS ITS MONEY

Scientific Research Disaster Recovery Grant (Cycle 1) Contact Information

Medicaid Transformation Waiver New options for Long-term Services and Supports. November 18th, 2016

Fleet and Marine Corps Health Risk Assessment, 02 January December 31, 2015

Minnesota s Registered Nurse Workforce

The Marine Corps A Young and Vigorous Force

2013 Workplace and Equal Opportunity Survey of Active Duty Members. Nonresponse Bias Analysis Report

Capacity Building Grants: Education Contact Information

FY 2015 Peace Corps Early Termination Report GLOBAL

Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education

Selected Measures United States, 2011

FY 2017 Peace Corps Early Termination Report GLOBAL

Salary and Demographic Survey Results

September 25, Via Regulations.gov

Avoidable Hospitalisation

Understanding Our Troops: A National Study on Military-Connected Students. Matthew Venaas Research Manager Skyfactor

Patient survey report Survey of people who use community mental health services 2011 Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust

PROFILE OF THE MILITARY COMMUNITY

Small Business Development Center Use in Pennsylvania

Florida Post-Licensure Registered Nurse Education: Academic Year

Evaluation of Health Care Homes:

Florida Licensed Practical Nurse Education: Academic Year

Industry Market Research release date: November 2016 ALL US [238220] Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning Contractors Sector: Construction

ALAN AND RUTH STEIN EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM APPLICATION PACKAGE

REPORT TO THE 2018 LEGISLATURE. Annual Report on Findings from the Hawai i Physician Workforce Assessment Project

NHS Grampian Equal Pay Monitoring Report

METHODOLOGY FOR INDICATOR SELECTION AND EVALUATION

GWINNETT COUNTY, GEORGIA

Minnesota s Registered Nurse Workforce

REGISTERING A PATIENT

Home Health Quality Improvement Campaign

Survey of Nurses 2015

Transcription:

Colorado Community College System ACADEMIC YEAR 2012-2013 NEED-BASED FINANCIAL AID APPLICANT DEMOGRAPHICS BASED ON 9 MONTH EFC NOVEMBER 2013 1

2012-2013 Aid Recipients and Applicants For academic year 2012-2013, 48,347 resident students attending a Colorado Community College System (CCCS) college received some sort of need-based financial aid. The amount received by these students totaled $165.8 million (Table 1). Four-fifths of the total $133.5 million came from federal grant and work study programs. Pell grants were the single largest source of need-based financial aid for CCCS students, accounting for $130.8 million of the total. The state contributed 18% of the total, while institutional contributions made up the remainder. In addition to the amounts in Table 1, CCCS students received approximately $204 million in federal loans. Table 1. Need-Based Financial Aid Awards to Colorado Resident CCCS Students Type Source Name Academic Year 2012-2013 Federal Pell $130,791,915 Federal Federal SEOG* $1,232,178 Subtotal Federal $132,024,093 Grants CO Student Grant $25,174,589 State GearUp $178,698 Subtotal State $25,353,287 Institutional Institutional Need-Based Awards $2,738,194 Total $160,115,574 Federal Federal Work Study $1,509,789 Work Study State CO Work Study - need based $4,209,446 Total $5,719,235 Total Need-based Aid $165,834,809 *Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant 2

Both the number of resident students receiving need-based financial aid and the total amount of aid decreased from year-ago levels (Figure 1). The 3.9% decrease in the number of students receiving aid is consistent with the 3.8% decrease in the overall resident headcount during the same time period. The decline in the amount of aid of 3.7% is primarily attributable to a decrease in federal funding of $6.6 million. Figure 1. Number of Students Receiving and Total Amount of Need-based Aid 60,000 $200 Number of Students 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 Dollars Students $180 $160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 Millions of Dollars 0 $0 AY10 AY11 AY12 AY13 Students Receiving Financial Aid Total Need-based Aid In 2012-2013, 36,656 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) resident students applied for federal financial aid by completing the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA). 1 This number equates to 66.1% of our resident student FTE (Table 2) 2. Fifty percent of our 1 The number of FTE students is calculated based on 30 resident instruction credit hours. We were unable to match 0.6% of students in the financial aid database with credit-hour data. 2 The time frame for financial aid data does not exactly match the time frame for FTE data. Both sets of data include three semesters and both sets include Fall 2012 and Spring 2013. However, financial aid data includes Summer 2013, while FTE data is based on Summer 2012. 3

resident FTE students were eligible to receive a federal Pell Grant, and 44.5% actually received Pell funds. Table 2. Financial Aid Applicants, Pell Eligible Applicants, and Pell Recipients as a Percent of Resident FTE by Institution CCCS Resident Aid Applicants Pell Eligible Pell Recipients College FTE FTE % FTE % FTE % ACC 5,595 3,412 61.0% 2,331 41.7% 1,971 35.2% CCA 4,454 2,926 65.7% 2,299 51.6% 2,025 45.5% CCD 6,707 4,692 70.0% 3,938 58.7% 3,563 53.1% CNCC 600 343 57.1% 217 36.1% 189 31.5% FRCC 12,658 8,282 65.4% 5,865 46.3% 5,101 40.3% LCC 600 342 57.0% 252 42.0% 235 39.2% MCC 1,053 570 54.2% 452 42.9% 414 39.3% NJC 1,277 898 70.3% 541 42.4% 501 39.2% OJC 1,048 755 72.0% 616 58.8% 577 55.1% PCC 4,249 3,378 79.5% 2,892 68.1% 2,690 63.3% PPCC 10,095 6,623 65.6% 5,148 51.0% 4,618 45.7% RRCC 5,898 3,495 59.3% 2,500 42.4% 2,094 35.5% TSJC 1,239 939 75.8% 757 61.0% 694 56.0% Total 55,475 36,656 66.1% 27,807 50.1% 24,673 44.5% A student s eligibility for need-based aid, particularly federal Pell grants, is based on a calculation called the Expected Family Contribution (EFC). A student s EFC is an indicator of ability to pay; the lower the EFC, the greater the need for financial aid. The EFC calculation takes into account a student s income and assets and those of his or her parents, if applicable adjusted for age and the number of family members at home and in college. As such, the EFC can vary widely at similar income levels. The EFC is measured against the student s cost of attending school to arrive at need for aid. 4

Students with an EFC of $5,550 or less were eligible to receive a Pell Grant in 2012-2013. While half of CCCS resident FTE met this standard, 16% applied for financial aid but exceeded the EFC amount for Pell eligibility (Table 3). Of these students, 29.6% had an EFC of between 100% and 150% of the Pell-eligible EFC (between $5,550 and $8,325); 17.6% had an EFC of between 150% and 200% of the Pell-eligible EFC (between $8,325 and $11,100); and 52.8% had an EFC that exceeded 200% of the Pelleligible EFC (greater than $11,100). Table 3. Non Pell Eligible Applicants by EFC by Institution* College Applied but Not Pell Eligible % of FTE Total FTE 150% EFC 200% EFC 200%+ EFC FTE % of Total FTE FTE % of Total FTE FTE % of Total FTE ACC 1,081 19.3% 300 5.4% 187 3.3% 594 10.6% CCA 627 14.1% 211 4.7% 117 2.6% 299 6.7% CCD 754 11.2% 287 4.3% 141 2.1% 326 4.9% CNCC 126 21.0% 32 5.3% 14 2.2% 81 13.5% FRCC 2,417 19.1% 685 5.4% 421 3.3% 1,311 10.4% LCC 90 15.0% 25 4.1% 15 2.6% 50 8.3% MCC 119 11.3% 33 3.1% 18 1.7% 68 6.4% NJC 357 28.0% 79 6.2% 50 3.9% 228 17.9% OJC 139 13.3% 36 3.4% 31 2.9% 72 6.9% PCC 486 11.4% 152 3.6% 85 2.0% 248 5.8% PPCC 1,475 14.6% 428 4.2% 256 2.5% 792 7.8% RRCC 995 16.9% 303 5.1% 194 3.3% 499 8.5% TSJC 183 14.7% 45 3.6% 33 2.7% 105 8.5% Total 8,849 16.0% 2,616 4.7% 1,561 2.8% 4,672 8.4% *EFC, or Expected Family Contribution, is represented by a percentage of Pell eligibility threshold. 5

Student Demographics The following pages examine demographic characteristics of students who applied for student aid. These characteristics include household size and income; gender; race/ethnicity; age; where students live, for which school location in an urban or rural area is used as a proxy; dependency status; and number of college students in the household. Please note that the demographic information in this section is based on headcount rather than FTE. 3 A total of 68,311 resident students applied for financial aid. Of these applicants, 52,276 were Pell eligible and 16,035 were not. 4 Household Size and Income Overall, students in our system eligible for a Pell grant had an average household size of 2.8 and an average adjusted gross income of $21,458, compared to an average household size of 3.0 and average adjusted gross income of $83,628 for non-pell-eligible students (Table 4). Table 4. Average Household Size and Income by EFC* Expected Family Contribution Pell Eligible Average Household Size Average Household Income Proportion of Resident Applicants Pell Eligible 2.8 $21,458 76.5% Expected Family Contribution Non Pell Eligible Average Household Size Average Household Income Proportion of Resident Applicants 100-150% of Pell Eligible 2.7 $52,948 7.1% 150-200% of Pell Eligible 2.8 $63,745 4.3% 200%+ of Pell Eligible 3.3 $108,653 12.1% Total Non Pell Eligible 3.0 $83,628 23.5% *EFC, or Expected Family Contribution, is represented by a percentage of Pell eligibility threshold. 3 Demographic information includes duplication of students when students are attending and/or receiving financial aid at more than one CCCS institution. For example, 1.1% of financial aid applicants are counted more than once. Comparisons to the overall CCCS population are for the financial aid reporting period. 4 Not all Pell-eligible students receive a Pell grant. Of eligible students, 44,169 received a grant. 6

Twenty-five percent of students who applied for financial aid live in a one-person household, and a one-person household was the most common household size for both Pell-eligible and non-pell-eligible students (Figure 2). Financial aid applicants in a oneperson household are more likely to be male than female (53.6% compared to 46.4%), white than minority (64.3% compared to 35.7%), and in the 25 to 34 age group (53.4% of all students in one-person households). Figure 2. Pell Eligibility by Household Size 30% Percent of Households 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 or more Household Size Pell Eligible Non Pell Eligible Three-quarters of students who applied for financial aid were Pell eligible. About onehalf of the remaining students had an EFC that was at least twice the Pell eligibility threshold (Figure 3). 7

Figure 3. Pell Eligibility Distribution of Resident Financial Aid Applicants 200%+ of Pell Eligible 12.1% Pell Eligible 76.5% 150-200% of Pell Eligible 4.3% 100-150% of Pell Eligible 7.1% Gender Females are more likely than males to be Pell eligible. Of Pell-eligible resident students, 61.1% were female, compared to 57.2% of the overall resident CCCS population (Table 5). Males are under-represented in the Pell-eligible population compared to their representation in the CCCS population as a whole. Of female students who applied for aid, 77.8% were Pell eligible; 74.7% of male applicants were Pell eligible. Table 5. Pell Eligibility by Gender Expected Family Contribution Male Female Not Reported Pell Eligible 38.8% 61.1% 0.1% Non Pell Eligible 42.9% 57.0% 0.1% 150% of Pell Eligible 43.1% 56.8% 0.1% 200% of Pell Eligible 40.1% 59.8% 0.2% 200%+ of Pell Eligible 43.8% 56.1% 0.1% CCCS Resident Population 42.6% 57.2% 0.2% 8

The gap between males and females in terms of Pell eligibility has narrowed in recent years, as illustrated in Figure 4. Since 2008-2009, the gender gap for eligibility for Pell grants has decreased 7.9 percentage points, while the difference between the overall proportions of resident male and female students decreased 2.8 percentage points. Figure 4. Comparison of Pell Eligibility Status by Gender Academic Year 2012-2013 Note: Percentages do not sum to 100 because unreported gender information is not included in the totals. Academic Year 2008-2009 9

Race/Ethnicity Pell-eligible students are proportionally more likely to be minority: 41.3% of all Pelleligible resident students were minorities, compared to 31.6% of the CCCS population (Table 6). Overall, 84.3% of minority students who applied for federal financial aid were Pell eligible. White students tend to be non Pell eligible at greater rates than minority students, particularly Black or Hispanic students. Table 6. EFC Eligibility by Ethnicity* Expected Family Contribution Non- Res. Alien Black Am. Indian/AK Native Asian Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander Hispanic Multiple Minority White Not Reported Pell Eligible 0.0% 11.6% 1.3% 3.1% 0.3% 20.8% 4.3% 41.3% 52.5% 6.2% Non Pell Eligible 0.0% 4.2% 0.9% 2.3% 0.3% 13.7% 3.8% 25.2% 69.1% 5.7% 150% of Pell 0.0% 5.2% 0.9% 2.9% 0.3% 15.5% 4.0% 28.8% 65.5% 5.6% Eligible 200% of Pell 0.0% 4.9% 0.7% 2.0% 0.4% 15.6% 3.9% 27.4% 67.1% 5.4% Eligible 200%+ of Pell 0.1% 3.4% 0.9% 2.1% 0.2% 12.0% 3.7% 22.2% 71.8% 5.9% Eligible Resident CCCS Population 0.5% 7.2% 1.0% 2.9% 0.3% 16.7% 3.5% 31.6% 60.7% 7.2% *Ethnicities included in the minority group include Black, American Indian/Alaskan native, Asian, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and multiple races. Students at Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSI) are more likely to be Pell eligible. 5 HSIs enrolled 22.8% of the CCCS resident population during the financial aid reporting period, while 29.6% of Pell-eligible, resident students attended an HSI (Table 7). An elevenpercentage-point disparity exists between HSIs and other institutions in terms of Pell eligibility: 84.6% of HSI financial aid applicants qualified as Pell eligible compared to 73.6% of applicants at other institutions. 5 Hispanic Serving Institutions include CCD, OJC, PCC, and TSJC. 10

Table 7. Pell Eligibility by Hispanic-Serving-Institution Status Expected Family Contribution Non HSI HSI Pell Eligible 70.4% 29.6% Non Pell Eligible 82.4% 17.6% 150% of Pell Eligible 80.3% 19.7% 200% of Pell Eligible 81.4% 18.6% 200%+ of Pell Eligible 84.0% 16.0% Resident CCCS Population 77.2% 22.8% Age Students from older age groups tend to be more likely than traditional-aged students to be Pell eligible (Table 8). Overall, 59% of CCCS Pell-eligible students are age 25 or older; this age group comprises 46.6% of the CCCS general population. Students under the age of 24 are less likely to qualify for Pell grants and are also more likely to have an EFC that is more than 200% of the eligibility threshold. These students are generally dependents and their EFC is based on their parents incomes. Table 8. Pell Eligibility by Age Group Expected Family Contribution 24 & Under 25 & Over Pell Eligible 41.0% 59.0% Non Pell Eligible 58.2% 41.8% 150% of Pell Eligible 48.6% 51.4% 200% of Pell Eligible 49.2% 50.8% 200%+ of Pell Eligible 67.0% 33.0% Resident CCCS Population 53.4% 46.6% 11

Expected Family Contribution Table 8. Pell Eligibility by Age Group (Continued) <18 18-20 21-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Pell Eligible 0.7% 20.4% 20.0% 34.9% 14.7% 6.9% 2.0% 0.3% Non Pell Eligible 1.1% 34.0% 23.1% 24.2% 9.8% 5.5% 2.1% 0.1% 150% of Pell Eligible 0.9% 25.8% 21.9% 34.2% 9.9% 5.5% 1.8% 0.1% 200% of Pell Eligible 1.0% 27.9% 20.3% 31.9% 11.1% 5.5% 2.2% 0.1% 200%+ of Pell Eligible 1.2% 41.1% 24.7% 15.7% 9.4% 5.5% 2.2% 0.2% Resident CCCS Population 11.0% 23.7% 18.7% 25.6% 11.3% 6.6% 2.6% 0.6% Location The location of a student s home, as measured by whether a student attends a rural or urban institution, does not appear to have a significant impact on Pell eligibility. 6 Of Pell-eligible resident students, 92% attended an urban college compared to 90.6% of the overall resident population. Conversely, a slightly lesser proportion of Pell-eligible students attended a rural college compared to the overall population: 8% compared to 9.4% (Table 9). Table 9. Pell Eligibility by Location Expected Family Contribution Rural Urban Pell Eligible 8.0% 92.0% Non Pell Eligible 7.8% 92.2% 150% of Pell Eligible 6.5% 93.5% 200% of Pell Eligible 7.1% 92.9% 200%+ of Pell Eligible 8.8% 91.2% CCCS Resident Population 9.4% 90.6% 6 Rural institutions include CNCC, LCC, MCC, NJC, OJC, and TSJC. The remaining seven institutions are classified as urban institutions. 12

Dependency Status Students who are financially independent are more likely to be Pell eligible than those who are dependent on their families for financial support: 74.4% of Pell-eligible students were independent, while the non-pell-eligible population was split about half and half between independent and dependent students (Table 10). As the Pell eligibility threshold increases, the proportion of dependent students increases. In total, two-thirds of CCCS resident financial aid applicants were considered independent, while the remaining onethird were dependents. Table 10. Dependency Status by Pell Eligibility Expected Family Contribution Dependent Independent Pell Eligible 25.6% 74.4% Non Pell Eligible 54.3% 45.7% 150% of Pell Eligible 41.4% 58.6% 200% of Pell Eligible 44.6% 55.4% 200%+ of Pell Eligible 65.2% 34.8% Number in College Four-fifths of CCCS resident financial aid applicants report that one person in the household attends college; 17.1% of households contain two college students (Figure 5). Of one-student households, 71.9% of applicants were financially independent. 13

Figure 5. Financial Aid Applicants by Number of Students in College Dependent 28.1% 3 or more students 2.6% 2 students 17.1% 1 student 80.4% 71.9% Independent Students were slightly less likely to be Pell eligible the greater the number of college students in the household: 77.2% of one-college-student applicant households were Pell eligible compared to 72.9% of applicant households with three or more college students (Table 11). Table 11. Number in College by Pell Eligibility Expected Family Contribution 1 college student 2 college students 3 or more college students Pell Eligible 77.2% 74.1% 72.9% Non Pell Eligible 22.8% 25.9% 27.1% 150% of Pell Eligible 29.8% 30.9% 37.0% 200% of Pell Eligible 17.4% 21.8% 17.2% 200%+ of Pell Eligible 52.8% 47.3% 45.8% 14