How to Critically Evaluate Systematic Reviews in Order to Inform Clinical Decision Making. Susan Weber Buchholz, PhD, RN, FAANP November, 2015

Similar documents
Objectives. Preparing Practice Scholars: Implementing Research in the DNP Curriculum. Introduction

Institute of Medicine Standards for Systematic Reviews

Systematic Review. Request for Proposal. Grant Funding Opportunity for DNP students at UMDNJ-SN

The influence of workplace culture on nurses learning experiences: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence.

Exploring the Science of Evidence Based Nursing. Presented by Geneva Craig, PhD, RN

This article is Part 1 of a two-part series designed. Evidenced-Based Case Management Practice, Part 1. The Systematic Review

Health Professionals Perceptions and Experiences of Open Disclosure: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.

Master of Clinical Science

Assessing competence during professional experience placements for undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review

Clinical Development Process 2017

Realist Synthesis Methodology 101

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW METHODS. Unit 1

KNOWLEDGE SYNTHESIS: Literature Searches and Beyond

Relevant Courses and academic requirements. Requirements: NURS 900 NURS 901 NURS 902 NURS NURS 906

METHODOLOGY. Transparency. Conflicts of Interest. Multidisciplinary Steering Committee Composition. Evidence Review

Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing

SEE WHAT S NEW TO THE THIRD EDITION!

Evidence-Based Practice Pulling the pieces together. Lynette Savage, RN, PhD, COI March 2017

Critical appraisal of systematic reviewsijn_1863

Evidence-Based Nursing Practice

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports 2013;11(12) 81-93

How to Find and Evaluate Pertinent Research. Levels and Types of Research Evidence

Doctor Of Nursing Practice Project And Clinical Guidebook

Rutgers School of Nursing-Camden

Doctor Of Nursing Practice Project And Clinical Guidebook

Nursing skill mix and staffing levels for safe patient care

Washington State Council of Perioperative Nurses October 14, 2011 Janet G. Schnall, MS, AHIP HEAL-WA University of Washington Health Sciences

Title:The impact of physician-nurse task-shifting in primary care on the course of disease: a systematic review

Effect of DNP & MSN Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Courses on Nursing Students Use of EBP

Curriculum Guide: DNP

Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Post-Master s DNP

Reviewing the literature

Doctor Of Nursing Practice Project And Clinical Guidebook

TITLE: Pill Splitting: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines

A Systematic Review of the Liaison Nurse Role on Patient s Outcomes after Intensive Care Unit Discharge

Facilitating Undergraduate Nursing Students Appraisal of Evidence

Level 1: Introduction to Evidence-Informed Practice

Improving Outcomes Through Performance Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, or Research: Choosing the Right Road

Disposable, Non-Sterile Gloves for Minor Surgical Procedures: A Review of Clinical Evidence

Standard methods for preparation of evidence reports

Rapid Review Evidence Summary: Manual Double Checking August 2017

Carers experiences when the person they have been caring for enters a residential aged care facility permanently: A systematic review

Publishing Journal Articles: Strategies for your Success

The optimal use of existing

PCNE WS 4 Fuengirola: Development of a COS for interventions to optimize the medication use of people discharged from hospital.

A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth

GSTF Journal of Nursing and Health Care (JNHC) Vol.3 No.1, November Fen Zhou, Hong Guo, Yufang Hao, and Ling Tang

GRADUATE PROGRAM IN PUBLIC HEALTH

Text-based Document. Effectiveness of Educational Interventions on the Research Literacy of Post-Registration Nurses: A Systematic Review

Chapter 2: Evidence-Based Nursing Practice

Essential Skills for Evidence-based Practice: Evidence Access Tools

Winona State University

ECLEPS CEL Workshop July 16, 2008 Evidence Based Practice (EBP)

THE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

The Experiences of Mental Health Professionals and. Patients in the use of Pro Re Nata Medication in Acute

Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool MMAT

Janet E Squires 1,2*, Katrina Sullivan 2, Martin P Eccles 3, Julia Worswick 4 and Jeremy M Grimshaw 2,5

Objectives. EBP: A Definition. EBP: A Definition. Evidenced-Based Practice and Research: The Fundamentals. EBP: The Definition

OSH Evidence. Search Documentation Form. How can needlestick injuries in health workers be prevented?

Effectiveness of interventions for the development of leadership skills among nurses: a systematic review protocol

Cognitive Level Certified Professional in Patient Safety Detailed Content Outline Recall. Total. Application Analysis 1.

COMPUS Procedure Evidence-Based Best Practice Recommendations

Running head: REFLECTION PAPER 1

Peer Review in the Journals Published by Chinese Medical Association: Experiences and Challenges

Master of Clinical Science

Nursing & Health Sciences Research Journal

Artificial Intelligence Changes Evidence Based Medicine A Scalable Health White Paper

Software Development Methodologies and Practices in Startups - Systematic Literature Review

Faculty Awareness when Teaching Transforming Evidence-based Literature into Practice

Evidence-Based Nursing Practice (Infection prevention & control)

Tiny Impact of ICTs and Paucity of Rigorous Causal Studies: A systematic review of urban MSMEs in the developing world

Objectives. Evidence Based Resources for Answering Clinical Questions: Only a Click Away. What is Evidence Based Practice?

Post-Professional Doctor of Occupational Therapy Elective Track in Aging

Evidence based practice: Colorectal cancer nursing perspective

Searching for Clinical Guidelines, Algorithms, and Mixed Methods Studies: What s Wrong with PICO?

Objectives. Brief Review: EBP vs Research. APHON/Mattie Miracle Cancer Foundation EBP Grant Program Webinar 3/5/2018

Post-Professional Doctor of Occupational Therapy Advanced Practice Track

JBI Database and Your Journals on Ovid

Winona State University

Greater Value Portfolio

Syntheses and research projects for sustainable spatial planning

Burden of MRSA Colonization in Elderly Residents of Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

D.N.P. Program in Nursing. Handbook for Students. Rutgers College of Nursing

Faculty of Nursing. Master s Project Manual. For Faculty Supervisors and Students

The Quest to Shape Health Policy Through Nursing Research Lessons from Legends: Power, Policy and Practice KUMC School of Nursing April 19, 2013

Pathophysiology Curriculum

A systematic review of the literature: executive summary

Fisher Leadership Initiative Fisher College of Business The Ohio State University

Building & Strengthening Your Evidence Based Practice Literature Searches

Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project Handbook 2016/2017

Qualitative Evidence for Practice: Why Not! Barbara Patterson, PhD, RN, ANEF Lehigh Valley Health Network Research Day 2016 October 28, 2016

NURS 324: Cornerstone of Professional Nursing Spring 2016

Online Data Supplement: Process and Methods Details

Advancing Nursing Education Science: An Analysis of NLN's Grant Program

Post-Professional Doctor of Occupational Therapy Elective Track in Administration and Practice Management

Short Report How to do a Scoping Exercise: Continuity of Care Kathryn Ehrich, Senior Researcher/Consultant, Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS. Health Sciences. Part-time. Total UK credits 180 Total ECTS 90 PROGRAMME SUMMARY

Searching Your EBSCO Research Databases ASUM: September 2016

4/30/2018. The Ethics of Evidenced Based Case Management. Objectives. Evidence - Based Case Management Practice

The effectiveness of strategies and interventions that aim to assist the transition from student to newly qualified nurse

Transcription:

How to Critically Evaluate Systematic Reviews in Order to Inform Clinical Decision Making Susan Weber Buchholz, PhD, RN, FAANP November, 2015

Systematic Reviews as a Nursing Tool Globally, published peer-reviewed health care literature has grown exponentially It is unrealistic for nurses to review a large amount of literature in a timely manner Systematic reviews now provide a tool for nurses to be able to quickly access literature Systematic reviews are part of the evidence-based tools needed to inform decisions in clinical practice 2

Understanding Systematic Reviews In order to be able to fully and appropriately use systematic reviews to inform clinical decisions, nurses need to have an understanding of What a strong systematic review is What the steps are in conducting a systematic review How to use existing tools to critically appraise systematic reviews 3

What is a Systematic Review Systematic review Overarching review name Examines and synthesizes findings from multiple studies Studies retrieved in response to answering a specific research question Systematic reviews are to be conducted using a rigorous process that is transparent, and therefore can be replicated with similar results 4

Systematic Review Research Methods Dependent on the research question Quantitative studies Qualitative studies Or both quantitative and qualitative studies With systematic review research methods, results can in be presented in different ways including in a Narrative format Tabular format Statistical format 5

Systematic Reviews Results Presentation With quantitative studies, results are often determined statistically, using different statistical methods including for example Effect sizes Meta-analyses Several different synthesis approaches are used when reviewing the findings from qualitative studies 6

Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review In the systematic review process, specific steps are used to conduct a systematic review In order to understand how to appraise a systematic review, it is important to understand the steps that occur in the systematic review process These are nine basic steps in conducting a systematic review 7

Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review 1. Determine who will be on the systematic review team 2. Determine a clear research question 3. Develop a study protocol that will guide the systematic review process 4. Choose the: a. Databases that will be searched b. Key words that will be used c. Inclusion and exclusion criteria that will be used for study retrieval 8

Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review 5. Complete literature retrieval 6. Complete a dual blinded review a. Title review b. Abstract review c. Full-text review 7. Extract data from full-texts that meet inclusion criteria 8. Synthesize the data 9. Report and provide implications on the findings 9

Appraising Systematic Reviews When critically appraising a systematic review to be used for clinical decision making Essentially the nurse is seeking to find out if a clearly focused question was addressed If valid methods were used in the review What are the results of the review Are the results useful for clinical decision making 10

Appraising Systematic Reviews 11

Tools for Systematic Review Appraisal There are multiple tools that already exist in the international literature, that are available for nurses to use when appraising systematic reviews For example these tools include The 10 questions to help you make sense of a review sheet from the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme The Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Systematic Review Appraisal Sheet sheet asks five questions to determine if the results of the review are valid, and one question that examines how the results are presented 12

Tools for Systematic Review Appraisal Other tools include AMSTAR is a tool that uses 11 questions to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews A seven step checklist to analyze systematic reviews is provided by Ressing, Blettner & Klug (2009) Joanna Briggs Institute provides a table Critical Appraisal of a Systematic Review in their Appraising Systematic Reviews information sheet 13

Tools for Systematic Review Appraisal Each of these tools presents a different approach to critical appraisal Some of the tools present very specific questions and others use broad questions A critical appraisal of a systematic review for clinical decision making is guided by asking different types of questions 14

Questions for Systematic Review Appraisal 1. Was there a clear question that guided the systematic review? 2. Was an a priori study protocol used? 3. What were the inclusion and exclusion criteria in the systematic review? 4. Was the literature search comprehensive and described in detail? 15

Questions for Systematic Review Appraisal 5. Were there at least two reviewers working independently to determine study inclusion and data extraction? 6. Was the scientific quality of individual studies assessed? 7. Was heterogeneity between studies assessed? 8. Were the statistical methods used appropriate and precise? 16

Questions for Systematic Review Appraisal 9. Was the synthesis of the studies appropriately conducted? 10. Were limitations of the review provided? 11. Were the results presented clearly? 12. Are the results of the study applicable to guide clinical decisions? 17

Relevance of Systematic Reviews Systematic reviews provide a rigorous appraisal and synthesis of large bodies of original research Systematic reviews provide an efficient method for clinicians to quickly access healthcare literature that can be used to inform clinical decision making However it is important for nurses to be able to quickly appraise systematic reviews to determine if these reviews are trustworthy and reliable sources of evidence-based research. 18

Confidently Using Systematic Reviews By understanding 1. What comprises a strong systematic review 2. The steps that are used to conduct a systematic review 3. Questions that are typically asked in appraising systematic reviews The nurse can confidently determine when and how systematic review results can be used to inform day-today clinical decisions! 19

International Systematic Review Resources http://iom.edu/reports/2011/finding-what-works-in-health- Care-Standards-for-Systematic-Reviews.aspx http://handbook.cochrane.org/ http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/

International Systematic Review Resources http://www.cebm.net/?o=1040 http://www.who.int/alliancehpsr/projects/unicatolica_srccrosscutting/en/ Centres for systematic reviews of health policy and systems research in low-and middle-income countries http://joannabriggs.org/ http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/pdf/systematic_reviews.pdf

Thank you