Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Similar documents
Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS. Report No. D March 26, Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Information Technology

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Ae?r:oo-t)?- Stc/l4. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Department of Defense

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

ACQUISITION OF THE ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM. Report No. D February 28, Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

or.t Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense DISTRIBUTION STATEMENTA Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited

Information System Security

INSPECTOR GENERAL, DOD, OVERSIGHT OF THE ARMY AUDIT AGENCY AUDIT OF THE FY 1999 ARMY WORKING CAPITAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Acquisition. Diamond Jewelry Procurement Practices at the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (D ) June 4, 2003

Supply Inventory Management

Department of Defense

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

ort ich-(vc~ Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense USE OF THE INTERNATIONAL MERCHANT PURCHASE AUTHORIZATION CARD

oft Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Human Capital. DoD Compliance With the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (D ) March 31, 2003

Acquisition. Fire Performance Tests and Requirements for Shipboard Mattresses (D ) June 14, 2002

Report No. D February 22, Internal Controls over FY 2007 Army Adjusting Journal Vouchers

Financial Management

Acquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006

Department of Defense

A udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001

Department of Defense

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL FUNCTIONAL AND PHYSICAL CONFIGURATION AUDITS OF THE ARMY PALADIN PROGRAM

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Information Technology

iort Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense Report No November 12, 1998

Followup Audit of Depot-Level Repairable Assets at Selected Army and Navy Organizations (D )

Report Documentation Page

Department of Defense

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL REPORT ON THE APPROPRIATION FOR THE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD. Report No December 13, 1996

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

A udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

November 22, Environment. DoD Alternative Fuel Vehicle Program (D ) Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

Department of Defense

Information Technology

Information Technology Management

DEFENSE CLEARANCE AND INVESTIGATIONS INDEX DATABASE. Report No. D June 7, Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Allegations Concerning the Defense Logistics Agency Contract Action Reporting System (D )

YEAR 2000 ISSUES WITHIN THE U.S. PACIFIC COMMAND'S AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY III MARINE EXPEDITIONARY FORCE

June 27, Logistics. Allegations Concerning the Egyptian Navy Frigate Program (D ) Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General

fvsnroü-öl-- p](*>( Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Internal Controls Over the Department of the Navy Cash and Other Monetary Assets Held in the Continental United States

Department of Defense

Report No. D-2011-RAM-004 November 29, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Projects--Georgia Army National Guard

Department of Defense

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Department of Defense

United States Government Accountability Office August 2013 GAO

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL CAPITALIZATION OF DOD GENERAL PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT. Department of Defense

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

Report No. D June 17, Long-term Travel Related to the Defense Comptrollership Program

ort Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

DOD FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT. Actions Are Needed on Audit Issues Related to the Marine Corps 2012 Schedule of Budgetary Activity

Report No. D February 9, Internal Controls Over the United States Marine Corps Military Equipment Baseline Valuation Effort

Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract

ort Office of the Inspector General INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STANDARD PROCUREMENT SYSTEM Report No May 26, 1999

Review of Defense Contract Management Agency Support of the C-130J Aircraft Program

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL

Department of Defense

Report Documentation Page

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

ort Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense OUTSOURCING OF DEFENSE SUPPLY CENTER, COLUMBUS, BUS AND TAXI SERVICE OPERATIONS

Report No. D July 25, Guam Medical Plans Do Not Ensure Active Duty Family Members Will Have Adequate Access To Dental Care

Report No. D May 14, Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Audit of Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentalities and Related Activities

Export-Controlled Technology at Contractor, University, and Federally Funded Research and Development Center Facilities (D )

H-60 Seahawk Performance-Based Logistics Program (D )

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: DoD Management of Space Professional Development

Report No. DODIG March 26, General Fund Enterprise Business System Did Not Provide Required Financial Information

Report No. D June 20, Defense Emergency Response Fund

Department of Defense

Report No. D April 9, Training Requirements for U.S. Ground Forces Deploying in Support of Operation Iraqi Freedom

Department of Defense

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

DODIG July 18, Navy Did Not Develop Processes in the Navy Enterprise Resource Planning System to Account for Military Equipment Assets

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AGENCY-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDIT OPINION

o*6i Distribution Unlimited Z5%u 06V7 E-9 1. Office of the Inspector General. f h IspcorGnea. Ofic. of Defense IN. X.

Report No. D August 12, Army Contracting Command-Redstone Arsenal's Management of Undefinitized Contractual Actions Could be Improved

Information System Security

Policies and Procedures Needed to Reconcile Ministry of Defense Advisors Program Disbursements to Other DoD Agencies

Report No. D June 16, 2011

Report No. D August 20, Missile Defense Agency Purchases for and from Governmental Sources

Report Documentation Page

ort Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense CONTROLS OVER CASE-RELATED MATERIAL AT THE ARMED FORCES INSTITUTE OF PATHOLOGY

DODIG March 9, Defense Contract Management Agency's Investigation and Control of Nonconforming Materials

Office of the Inspector General. DRO QUALM W pc,6 Department of Defense CONTRACT ACTIONS FOR LEASED EQUIPMENT. Report Number June 30, 1999

Briefing No. D-2010-RAM-003 March 10, Repair Aircraft Parking Apron at Naval Station Norfolk

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: DoD Public Affairs and Visual Information (PA&VI) Education and Training (E&T)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Report No. D December 16, Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center's Use of Undefinitized Contractual Actions

Transcription:

INSPECTOR GENERAL, DOD, OVERSIGHT OF THE NAVAL AUDIT SERVICE AUDIT OF THE FY 2000 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY GENERAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Report No. D-2001-056 February 21, 2001 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Form SF298 Citation Data Report Date ("DD MON YYYY") 21Feb2001 Report Type N/A Dates Covered (from... to) ("DD MON YYYY") Title and Subtitle Inspector General, DOD, Oversight of the Naval Audit Service Audit of the FY 2000 Department of the Navy General Fund Financial Statements Authors Contract or Grant Number Program Element Number Project Number Task Number Work Unit Number Performing Organization Name(s) and Address(es) OAIG-AUD (ATTN: AFTS Audit Suggestions) Inspector General, Department of Defense 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA 22202-2884 Sponsoring/Monitoring Agency Name(s) and Address(es) Performing Organization Number(s) D-2001-056 Monitoring Agency Acronym Monitoring Agency Report Number(s) Distribution/Availability Statement Approved for public release, distribution unlimited Supplementary Notes Abstract Public Law 101-576, the ihchief Financial Officers Act of 1990,lo November 15, 1990, as amended by Public Law 103-356, the "Federal Financial Management Act of 1994," October 13, 1994, requires DoD to prepare annual audited Department of the Navy General Fund financial statements. Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 01-02, "Audit Requirements for Federal Financial Statements," October 16, 2000, establishes the minimum requirements for these financial statements. This Bulletin requires the Inspector General, DoD, to express an opinion on the DoD financial statements and to report on the adequacy of internal controls and compliance with laws and regulations. We delegated the audit of the FY 2000 Department of the Navy General Fund financial statements to the Naval Audit Service. This is the third in a series of reports on our audit of the FY 2000 Department of the Navy General Fund financial statements. This report provides the results of our oversight of the Naval Audit Service work. Our first report discusses the journal entries made to support the departmental reporting for the Marine Corps and our second report discusses the preparation of financial reports for Marine Corps appropriations. Subject Terms

Document Classification unclassified Classification of Abstract unclassified Classification of SF298 unclassified Limitation of Abstract unlimited Number of Pages 37

Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this audit report, visit the Inspector General, DoD, Home Page at www.dodig.osd.mil/audit/reports or contact the Secondary Reports Distribution Unit of the Audit Followup and Technical Support Directorate at (703) 604-8937 (DSN 664-8937) or fax (703) 604-8932. Suggestions for Future Audits To suggest ideas for or to request future audits, contact the Audit Followup and Technical Support Directorate at (703) 604-8940 (DSN 664-8940) or fax (703) 604-8932. Ideas and requests can also be mailed to: Defense Hotline OAIG-AUD (ATTN: AFTS Audit Suggestions) Inspector General, Department of Defense 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA 22202-4704 To report fraud, waste, or abuse, contact the Defense Hotline by calling (800) 424-9098; by sending an electronic message to Hotline@dodig.osd.mil; or by writing to the Defense Hotline, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1900. The identity of each writer and caller is fully protected. Acronym NAS Naval Audit Service

Office of the Inspector General, DoD Report No. D-2001-056 February 21, 2001 (Project No. D2000FC-0283.001) Inspector General, DoD, Oversight of the Naval Audit Service Audit of the FY 2000 Department of the Navy General Fund Financial Statements Executive Summary Introduction. Public Law 101-576, the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990, November 15, 1990, as amended by Public Law 103-356, the Federal Financial Management Act of 1994, October 13, 1994, requires DoD to prepare annual audited Department of the Navy General Fund financial statements. Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 01-02, Audit Requirements for Federal Financial Statements, October 16, 2000, establishes the minimum requirements for these financial statements. This Bulletin requires the Inspector General, DoD, to express an opinion on the DoD financial statements and to report on the adequacy of internal controls and compliance with laws and regulations. We delegated the audit of the FY 2000 Department of the Navy General Fund financial statements to the Naval Audit Service. This is the third in a series of reports on our audit of the FY 2000 Department of the Navy General Fund financial statements. This report provides the results of our oversight of the Naval Audit Service work. Our first report discusses the journal entries made to support the departmental reporting for the Marine Corps and our second report discusses the preparation of financial reports for Marine Corps appropriations. Objective. Our objectives were to oversee the Naval Audit Service audit of the FY 2000 Department of the Navy General Fund financial statements and to determine the reliability and effectiveness of processes and procedures used to prepare those statements. This report focuses on the oversight objective. The objective for determining the reliability and effectiveness of processes and procedures used to prepare financial statements is addressed in our first two audit reports for this project. A subsequent audit report will further discuss this objective and our review of the management control program for departmental and financial statement reporting. See Appendix A for a discussion of the audit process. Results. The Naval Audit Service report, Fiscal Year 2000 Department of the Navy General Fund Principal Statements, February 7, 2001, states that the auditors were unable to express an opinion on the FY 2000 Department of the Navy General Fund financial statements. We concur with the Naval Audit Service disclaimer of opinion; our endorsement of that disclaimer is Exhibit 1. Excerpts from the Naval Audit Service audit report are included as Exhibit 2 and provide the reasons for the disclaimer of opinion and identify the material weaknesses and reportable conditions associated with the internal controls and compliance with laws and regulations. Naval Audit Service reports can be accessed on the Internet at http://www.hq.navy.mil/navalaudit. The FY 2000 Department of the Navy General Fund financial statements can be accessed on the Internet at www.dtic.mil/comptroller.

Table of Contents Executive Summary i Appendixes Exhibits A. Audit Process Scope and Methodology 1 Prior Coverage 2 B. Report Distribution 3 1. Inspector General, DoD, Endorsement Memorandum 2. Excerpts from Naval Audit Service Report Fiscal Year 2000 Department of the Navy General Fund Principal Statements

Appendix A. Audit Process Scope and Methodology Audit Work Performed. To fulfill our responsibilities under Public Law 101-576, the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990, as amended by Public Law 101-356, the Federal Financial Management Act of 1994, and Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 01-02, Audit Requirements for Federal Financial Statements, dated October 16, 2000, we performed oversight of the independent audit conducted by the Naval Audit Service (NAS) of the FY 2000 Department of the Navy General Fund financial statements. We reviewed the NAS audit approach and monitored audit progress at key points. Reviewing the NAS Audit Approach. We used the Federal Financial Statement Audit Manual, January 1993, issued by the President s Council on Integrity and Efficiency, and the Financial Audit Manual, December 12, 1997, issued by the General Accounting Office, as the criteria for reviewing the NAS audit approach. We reviewed the notification letter, formulation of strategy, entity profile, general risk analysis, cycle memorandums, and audit programs. In addition, we participated in NAS meetings on the Department of the Navy General Fund financial statements. The meetings covered the NAS planning and formulation of audit strategy and included presentations on issues that developed during the NAS work. Monitoring Audit Progress. Through the DoD Financial Statement Audit Executive Steering Committee, and an integrated line-item oversight effort, we provided a forum for a centrally managed exchange of guidance and information. We reviewed and commented on the NAS audit opinion report, which included discussions of issues on internal controls and compliance with laws and regulations. We reviewed key workpapers and summaries of NAS audit results and conclusions. DoD-Wide Corporate-Level Government Performance and Results Act Coverage. In response to the Government Performance and Results Act, the Secretary of Defense annually establishes DoD-wide corporate-level goals, subordinate performance goals, and performance measures. This report pertains to achievement of the following corporate-level goal, subordinate performance goal, and performance measure. FY 2001 DoD Corporate-Level Goal 2: Prepare now for an uncertain future by pursuing a focused modernization effort that maintains U.S. qualitative superiority in key warfighting capabilities. Transform the force by exploiting the Revolution in Military Affairs, and reengineer the Department to achieve a 21st century infrastructure. (01-DoD-02) FY 2001 Subordinate Performance Goal 2.5: Improve DoD financial and information management. (01-DoD-2.5) 1

FY 2001 Performance Measure 2.5.2: Achieve unqualified opinions on financial statements. (01 DoD-2.5.2) DoD Functional Area Reform Objectives and Goals. Most major DoD functional areas have also established performance improvement reform objectives and goals. This report pertains to achievement of the following functional area objective and goal. Financial Management Area. Objective: Strengthen internal controls. Goal: Improve compliance with the Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act. (FM-5.3) General Accounting Office High-Risk Area. The General Accounting Office has identified several high-risk areas in DoD. This report provides coverage of the DoD Financial Management high-risk area. Audit Type, Period, and Standards. We performed this financial statement audit from September 7, 2000, through February 7, 2001, in accordance with auditing standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, as implemented by the Inspector General, DoD. We did not use computerprocessed data to conduct our oversight of the Naval Audit Service audit of the FY 2000 Department of the Navy General Fund financial statements. Contacts During the Audit. We visited or contacted individuals and organizations in the DoD audit community. Further details are available on request. Prior Coverage The General Accounting Office and the Inspector General, DoD, have conducted multiple reviews related to financial statement issues. General Accounting Office reports can be accessed on the Internet at http://www.gao.gov. Inspector General, DoD, reports can be accessed on the Internet at http://www.dodig.osd.mil/audit/reports. 2

Appendix B. Report Distribution Office of the Secretary of Defense Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Deputy Chief Financial Officer Deputy Comptroller (Program/Budget) Department of the Army Auditor General, Department of the Army Department of the Navy Naval Inspector General Auditor General, Department of the Navy Department of the Air Force Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Financial Management and Comptroller) Auditor General, Department of the Air Force Other Defense Organization Director, Defense Finance and Accounting Service Non-Defense Federal Organizations Office of Management and Budget General Accounting Office Congressional Committees and Subcommittees, Chairman and Ranking Minority Member Senate Committee on Appropriations Senate Subcommittee on Defense, Committee on Appropriations Senate Committee on Armed Services Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs House Committee on Appropriations House Subcommittee on Defense, Committee on Appropriations House Committee on Armed Services House Committee on Government Reform House Subcommittee on Government Efficiency, Financial Management, and Intergovernmental Relations, Committee on Government Reform House Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations, Committee on Government Reform House Subcommittee on Technology and Procurement Policy, Committee on Government Reform 3

Exhibit 1. Inspector General, DoD, Endorsement Memorandum

Exhibit 2. Excerpts from Naval Audit Service Report, FY 2000 Department of the Navy General Fund Principal Statements

Audit Team Members The Finance and Accounting Directorate, Office of the Assistant Inspector General for Auditing, DoD, prepared this report. Personnel of the Office of the Inspector General, DoD, who contributed to the report are listed below. F. Jay Lane Salvatore D. Guli Marvin L. Peek Linda A. Pierce Edward A. Blair David J. Ramseyer Kristie J. Ebert