ACCESS TO CARE FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS IS A CHALLENGE FOR MANY IN MASSACHUSETTS

Similar documents
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO HOUSE BILL 4018

s n a p s h o t Medi-Cal at a Crossroads: What Enrollees Say About the Program

Colorado s Health Care Safety Net

CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION. Medi-Cal Versus Employer- Based Coverage: Comparing Access to Care JULY 2015 (REVISED JANUARY 2016)

The Affordable Care Act, HRSA, and the Integration of Behavioral Health Services

June 25, Shamis Mohamoud, David Idala, Parker James, Laura Humber. AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting

Financing SBIRT in Primary Care: The Alphabet Soup and Making Sense of it

Minnesota s Licensed Marriage & Family Therapist (LMFT) Workforce, 2017 HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE 2016 LMFT SURVEY

TRICARE: Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Treatment for Child and Adolescent Beneficiaries

Suicide Among Veterans and Other Americans Office of Suicide Prevention

Cardinal Innovations Healthcare 2017 Needs and Gaps Analysis

Workforce Development in Mental Health

Nowhere to Turn. Findings from a survey on access to mental health and addiction treatment among Missouri health plan beneficiaries

o Recipients must coordinate these testing services with other HIV prevention and testing programs to avoid duplication of efforts.

A REVIEW OF NURSING HOME RESIDENT CHARACTERISTICS IN OHIO: TRACKING CHANGES FROM

Dual Eligibles: Medicaid s Role in Filling Medicare s Gaps

The Budget: Maximizing Federal Reimbursement For Parolee Mental Health Care Summary

The Number of People With Chronic Conditions Is Rapidly Increasing

Appendix A Registered Nurse Nonresponse Analyses and Sample Weighting

Indiana s Health Care Workforce

Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2016 Executive Summary

Mental Health Liaison Group

Alternative Managed Care Reimbursement Models

Specialty Behavioral Health and Integrated Services

Minnesota s Physical Therapist Assistant Workforce, 2015

Minnesota s Marriage & Family Therapist (MFT) Workforce, 2015

In-Home Services Programs

Health Professions Workforce

Mental Health Services Provided in Specialty Mental Health Organizations, 2004

Community Health Needs Assessment for Corning Hospital: Schuyler, NY and Steuben, NY:

ALL MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER PROGRAMS MUST INCLUDE PSYCHOSOCIAL AND PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATIONS

Why Massachusetts Community Health Centers

Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2015

The Mental Health Workforce: A Primer

MEDICAID EXPANSION & THE ACA: Issues for the HCH Community

Online Classifieds. The number of online adults to use classified ads websites, such as Craigslist, more than doubled from 2005 to 2009.

Activities to Reduce Health Disparities under Massachusetts Health Care Reform

U.S. HOME CARE WORKERS: KEY FACTS

2012 Ohio Medicaid Assessment Survey Research Conference Data spotlight on key populations and patient-centered medical home status in Ohio

EVALUATION OF THE CARE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECT. Prepared By: Geneva Strech, M. Ed., MHR Betty Harris, M. A. John Vetter, M. A.

Recruitment & Financial Benefits of Health Professional Shortage Areas

Community Health Centers: Growing Importance in a Changing Health Care System

Major Dimensions of Managed Behavioral Health Care Arrangements Level 3: MCO/BHO and Provider Contract

MassHealth Accountable Care Update

CLOSING THE DIVIDE: HOW MEDICAL HOMES PROMOTE EQUITY IN HEALTH CARE

The Mental Health Workforce: A Primer

EVALUATION OF THE CARE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECT. June 30, 2011 Prepared By: Geneva Strech, M. Ed., MHR Betty Harris, M. A. John Vetter, M. A.

2016 BEHAVIORAL HEALTH GRANT OPPORTUNITY

DHS-7659-ENG MEDICAID MATTERS The impact of Minnesota s Medicaid Program

Overview Application for a Medically Underserved Population Designation for Fairfax County

SAMHSA Primary and Behavioral Health Care Integration (PBHCI) Program Grantees: Part 2

Wisconsin State Plan to Serve More Children and Youth within Medical Homes

The Florida KidCare Evaluation: Statistical Analyses

Stigma and Attitudes Toward Working in Integrated Care

First Look at Iowa's Medicaid Expansion: How Well Did Members Transition to the Iowa Health & Wellness Plan from IowaCare

Managed Medi-Cal Behavioral Health Benefits. Alliance Board Meeting October 23, 2013

Mina Li, MD., PhD., CSM Institute for Disability Studies (IDS) The University of Southern Mississippi

Aging in Place: Do Older Americans Act Title III Services Reach Those Most Likely to Enter Nursing Homes? Nursing Home Predictors

School of Public Health University at Albany, State University of New York

SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH, ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE AND HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION

Medicaid Coverage and Care for the Homeless Population: Key Lessons to Consider for the 2014 Medicaid Expansion

LOUISIANA MEDICAID PROGRAM ISSUED: 06/09/17 REPLACED: CHAPTER 2: BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES SECTION 2.2: OUTPATIENT SERVICES PAGE(S) 8

Physicians Views of the Massachusetts Health Care Reform Law A Poll

What is a Pathways HUB?

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Summary of Key Health Information Technology Provisions June 1, 2010

Summary of Findings. Data Memo. John B. Horrigan, Associate Director for Research Aaron Smith, Research Specialist

In Press at Population Health Management. HEDIS Initiation and Engagement Quality Measures of Substance Use Disorder Care:

1. Standard Contract Provisions [ 438.3(s)(3)]: Ensuring access to the 340B prescription drug program

Findings from the Field: Medicaid Delivery Systems and Access to Care in Four States in Year Three of the ACA

DMC-ODS. System Transformation. Presented at DHCS 2017 Annual Conference. Elizabeth Stanley-Salazar, MPH Doug Bond Lisa Garcia, LCSW

Implementation Strategy For the 2016 Community Health Needs Assessment North Texas Zone 2

Providence Hood River Memorial Hospital 2010 Community Assets and Needs Assessment Report

11/10/2015. Workforce Shortages and Maldistribution. Health Care Workforce Shortages/Maldistribution: Why? Access to Health Care Services

White House Parity Task Force Provides Guidance on Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Parity Law

Continuing Disparities in Access to Mental and Physical Health Care THE DOCTOR IS OUT

NACRHHS Policy Briefs on Emergency Care Models and Rural Opioid Misuse Implications

CONTRA COSTA MENTAL HEALTH MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Exploring Public Health Barriers and Opportunities in Eye Care: Role of Community Health Clinics

THE UTILIZATION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANTS IN CALIFORNIA S LICENSED COMMUNITY CLINICS

2015 DUPLIN COUNTY SOTCH REPORT

TEXAS HEALTHCARE TRANSFORMATION & QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Bluebonnet Trails Community Services

Denver Health & Hospital Authority 2017 Budget Overview

The North Carolina Mental Health and Substance Abuse Workforce

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA * DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE ISSUE DAT E: DRAFT

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL WORKFORCE

Bianca K. Frogner, PhD Assistant Professor The George Washington University. Joanne Spetz, PhD Professor University of California, San Francisco

Physician Workforce Fact Sheet 2016

Using Secondary Datasets for Research. Learning Objectives. What Do We Mean By Secondary Data?

Annex A: State Level Analysis: Selection of Indicators, Frontier Estimation, Setting of Xmin, Xp, and Yp Values, and Data Sources

Patterns of Ambulatory Mental Health Care in Navy Clinics

Partnering with Managed Care Entities A Path to Coordination and Collaboration

Community Health Needs Assessment July 2015

The Medical Home Model: What Is It And How Do Social Workers Fit In?

Community Health Needs Assessment April, 2018

Community Health Needs Assessment: St. John Owasso

Predicting Transitions in the Nursing Workforce: Professional Transitions from LPN to RN

Health Care through the Eyes of Coloradans New Data on the Consumer Perspective

Certified Community Behavioral Health Centers and New York State s Healthcare Reform: Considerations for Providers

Caring for the Underserved - Innovative Pharmacy Practice Integration

Benefits by Service: Outpatient Hospital Services (October 2006)

Transcription:

ACCESS TO CARE FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS IS A CHALLENGE FOR MANY IN MASSACHUSETTS DECEMBER 2018 Despite Massachusetts large behavioral health workforce, 1 many state residents report difficulties obtaining mental health services, and both residents and providers report long wait times for outpatient mental health services. 2,3 Based on new data from the 2018 Massachusetts Health Reform Survey (MHRS), more than half (56.8 percent) of adults 19 to 64 who sought care for mental health (MH) and/or substance use disorders (SUDs) 4 over the past 12 months reported difficulties obtaining needed care, including difficulty finding an MH/ SUDs provider 5 who would see them at all or difficulty getting an appointment with an MH/SUDs provider as soon as needed (Figure 1). Those difficulties likely contributed to more than one-third (38.7 percent) of those adults going without needed MH/SUDs care in the past year and one in eight (12.7 percent) visiting the emergency department (ED) for MH/SUDs related issues. Roughly half of those reporting an ED visit for an MH issue reported that their most recent visit was for a nonemergency MH condition; FIGURE 1. ACCESS TO CARE FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND/OR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS (MH/SUDs) OVER THE PAST 12 MONTHS AMONG MASSACHUSETTS ADULTS 19 TO 64 WHO SOUGHT IT, 2018 Had difficulty finding an MH/SUDs provider or getting an appointment as soon as needed Went without needed MH/SUDs care Had an emergency department (ED) visit for MH/SUDs Most recent ED visit for MH was for a nonemergency MH condition 12.7% 6.3% Note: A nonemergency MH condition is one that the respondent thought could have been treated by a regular doctor or MH provider, had one been available. that is, an MH condition that could have been treated by a regular doctor or MH provider, had one been available. In this brief, we examine the health care experiences of adults 19 to 64 who sought care for MH conditions and/ or SUDs in Massachusetts. We find pervasive gaps in their access to health care overall, with the largest gaps reported for MH/SUDs care. STUDY DATA AND METHODS We use data for 2018 from the MHRS, a periodic randomdigit dial (RDD) telephone survey of adults 19 to 64 in Massachusetts that has been conducted since 2006. The 2018 MHRS included oversamples of low- and moderateincome adults and was conducted in English and Spanish, with calls to cell and landline phones. The response rate was 14 percent, which reflects the significant drop in response rates for RDD surveys in recent years. 6,7 The response rate for the MHRS is comparable to rates obtained in other recent state surveys relying on RDD methods. 8 The MHRS collects information on health insurance coverage, health care access and use, health care affordability, and demographic and socioeconomic characteristics from a sample of noninstitutionalized civilian adults ages 19 to 64. 9 The survey sample is weighted to reflect the probability of selection into the survey and includes a post-stratification adjustment to ensure that the characteristics of the overall sample were consistent with the characteristics of the Massachusetts population for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and geographic distribution. There were 2,201 adults in the 2018 sample. The 2018 MHRS added questions on access to and use of care for MH conditions and/or SUDs, which are the primary Sharon K. Long Joshua Aarons Urban Institute

data used for this analysis. We focus on experiences seeking MH/SUDs care over the past 12 months, including health care use, unmet need for care, and barriers to obtaining care. 10 Seeking care includes receiving MH/SUDs care or trying to obtain that care over the past year. A key limitation of the analysis is that we rely on self-reports, which may underestimate the true scope of MH/SUDs need in the state. Further, the MHRS sample is limited to community-based individuals and so will not include those who were in institutional settings, such as inpatient MH settings or residential SUD treatment facilities, at the time of the survey. We used Stata (version 15) with survey weights for all analyses to account for the complex design of the survey. We consider estimates with p values <.05 to be statistically significant. STUDY RESULTS Adults seeking MH/SUDs care for themselves or a family member. In early 2018, nearly one-quarter (23.2 percent) of adults 19 to 64 in Massachusetts reported seeking MH/SUDs care for themselves or a family member over the past 12 months, with 15.9 percent seeking care for themselves (Figure 2). 11 Of adults seeking MH/SUDs care for themselves, nearly all (96.2 percent) reported seeking care for an MH condition, while 13.8 percent reported seeking care for SUDs. 12 In the remainder of the brief, we focus on adults who sought MH/SUDs care for themselves. Adults seeking MH/SUDs care for themselves crossed all age, sex, race/ethnicity, and income categories, although they were disproportionately younger, female, white/non- Hispanic, and lower income (defined as family income below 300 percent of the Federal Poverty Level [FPL]) (Figure 3). In fact, the majority (71.4 percent) of those seeking MH/SUDs care for themselves were lower income, which translates into nearly one-quarter (23.9 percent) of lower-income adults in Massachusetts seeking MH/SUDs care for themselves (data not shown). Adults seeking MH/SUDs care also were more likely to report that their MH status was fair or poor and that they had a work or activity limitation due to MH/SUDs issues. 13 FIGURE 2. SHARE OF MASSACHUSETTS ADULTS 19 TO 64 WHO SOUGHT CARE FOR MH/SUDs FOR THEMSELVES OR A FAMILY MEMBER, 2018 Sought care for MH/SUDs Sought care for an MH condition Sought care for an SUD 4.9% 2.2% SOUGHT CARE FOR THEMSELVES OR A FAMILY MEMBER SOUGHT CARE FOR THEMSELVES 23.2% 15.9% 21.9% 15.3% Only respondents who did not seek care for themselves were asked about seeking care for family members. FIGURE 3. CHARACTERISTICS OF MASSACHUSETTS ADULTS 19 TO 64, BY WHETHER THEY SOUGHT CARE FOR MH/SUDs, 2018 AGE RACE/ETHNICITY FAMILY INCOME 19 to 34 35 to 49 50 to 64 Female White, non-hispanic Other race, non-hispanic Hispanic Not reported At or below 138% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) Between 138% and 300% of FPL At or above 300% of FPL MH status is fair or poor Has limitation due to MH/SUDs Has fair or poor MH status or MH/SUDs limitation SOUGHT MH/SUDs CARE DID NOT SEEK MH/SUDs CARE 9.2% 12.0% 2.4% 1.6% 11.8% 17.4%* 5.9%** 36.2% 19.4%** 35.2% 23.7%** 11.8%** 25.7% 35.1%* 14.3%** 43.9% 35.8% 30.4% 29.2% 28.7% 34.2% 59.2% 49.4%* 76.5% 69.0%* 56.9%** 48.7% 54.3% Note: Estimates may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding and/or item nonresponse. Unless otherwise noted, responses are missing for less than 1 percent of cases. Sought care is defined as obtained care or tried to obtain care. Has limitation due to MH/SUDs is defined as having an MH/SUDs issue that kept the individual from work or usual activities for any of the previous 30 days. */** Significantly different from adults who sought MH/SUDs care at the.05 (.01) level, two-tailed test. [ 2 ]

Altogether, 54.3 percent of adults who sought MH/SUDs care for themselves reported that their MH/SUDs status was fair or poor, or that MH/SUDs issues had kept them from work or their usual activities for any of the previous 30 days. It is important to note that 14.3 percent of those who did not seek MH/SUDs care also reported that their MH status was fair or poor, or that they had MH/SUDs limitations. This finding suggests that some adults with MH/ SUDs issues may not be seeking needed care and may be going without care for an MH condition or SUD. This raises questions about how the impact of stigma or concerns about knowing where and how to navigate the behavioral health system create barriers to seeking MH/SUDs care. Access to health care, including MH/SUDs care. Access to health care was a challenge for many adults who sought MH/SUDs care, with more than half (56.8 percent) reporting difficulties obtaining MH/SUDs care, and almost three-quarters (73.0 percent) reporting difficulties obtaining health care in general (Figure 4). The difficulties obtaining MH/SUDs care included difficulties finding an MH/SUDs provider (reported by 46.4 percent of adults who sought MH/SUDs care) and problems getting an appointment for MH/SUDs care as soon as it was needed (43.5 percent) (Figure 5). Reported reasons for having difficulties finding a provider included being told that an MH/SUDs provider did not take any health insurance (10.8 percent), did not take the type of insurance the respondent has (35.7 percent), or was not accepting new patients (35.5 percent). The adults reporting difficulties obtaining MH/SUDs care crossed all age, sex, race/ethnicity, and income categories (data not shown). A majority (61.7 percent) of adults who sought MH/SUDs care reported going without some type of needed health care over the past 12 months, with more than one-third (38.7 percent) reporting going without needed MH/SUDs care, including needed MH/SUDs services or needed MH/ SUDs prescription drugs. 14 Unmet need for MH/SUDs services was reported by 32.3 percent of adults, while unmet need for MH/SUDs prescription drugs was reported by 12.2 percent (Figure 6). FIGURE 4. GAPS IN ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE OVER THE PAST 12 MONTHS AMONG MASSACHUSETTS ADULTS 19 TO 64 WHO SOUGHT CARE FOR MH/SUDs, 2018 Had difficulty finding a provider or getting an appointment as soon as needed Went without needed services or prescription drugs Had an emergency department visit GAP RELATED TO MH/SUDs CARE GAP RELATED TO ANY HEALTH CARE 12.7% 73.0% 61.7% 42.8% Difficulty getting an appointment is defined as sometimes or never getting an appointment as soon as needed. FIGURE 5. DIFFICULTIES OBTAINING CARE FOR MH/SUDs AMONG MASSACHUSETTS ADULTS 19 TO 64 WHO SOUGHT IT, 2018 Had difficulty obtaining MH/SUDs care in past 12 months Had difficulty finding an MH/SUDs provider who would see them Told MH/SUDs provider not accepting any insurance Told MH/SUDs provider not accepting insurance type Told MH/SUDs provider not accepting new patients Had difficulty getting an MH/SUDs appointment as soon as needed 10.8% 35.7% 35.5% 46.4% 43.5% Difficulty getting an appointment is defined as sometimes or never getting an appointment as soon as needed. FIGURE 6. UNMET NEED FOR CARE FOR MH/SUDs AMONG MASSACHUSETTS ADULTS 19 TO 64 WHO SOUGHT IT, 2018 Any unmet need for health care (including MH/SUDs care) Unmet need for MH/SUDs care Unmet need for MH/SUDs services Unmet need for MH/SUDs prescription drugs 12.2% 32.3% MH/SUDs care includes services and prescription drugs, while MH/SUDs services does not include prescription drugs. 61.7% [ 3 ]

FIGURE 7. TYPE OF UNMET NEED FOR HEALTH CARE AMONG MASSACHUSETTS ADULTS 19 TO 64 WHO SOUGHT CARE FOR MH/SUDs, 2018 MH/SUDs services Doctor care (including specialists) Medical test, treatment, or follow-up care Preventive-care screening Dental care Prescription drugs (including MH/SUDs prescription drugs) 12.9% 18.4% 25.3% 32.3% 28.4% 24.3% FIGURE 8. HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE AND CONNECTIONS TO THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM AMONG MASSACHUSETTS ADULTS 19 TO 64 BY WHETHER THEY SOUGHT CARE FOR MH/SUDs, 2018 Had health insurance coverage at the time of the survey Had health insurance coverage all year Had a usual place for health care Had an outpatient visit in the past 12 months SOUGHT MH/SUDs CARE DID NOT SEEK MH/SUDs CARE 96.1% 96.0% 84.6% 88.2% 88.1% 84.3% 89.2% 77.6%** */** Significantly different from adults who sought MH/SUDs care at the.05 (.01) level, two-tailed test. FIGURE 9. GAPS IN ACCESS TO CARE FOR MH/SUDs FOR MASSACHUSETTS ADULTS 19 TO 64 WHO SOUGHT IT, BY WHETHER THEY HAD HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE ALL YEAR, 2018 Had difficulty finding an MH/SUDs provider or getting an appointment as soon as needed 54.6% Although unmet need was highest for MH/SUDs care, unmet need for other types of health care also was high for adults who sought MH/SUDs care (Figure 7). About one-quarter (25.3 percent) of adults reported going without needed doctor care (including specialists) and prescription drugs (24.3 percent), while slightly more (28.4 percent) reported going without needed dental care. Among adults who did not seek MH/SUDs care, unmet need was lower, at 12.7 percent for unmet need for doctor care (including specialists), 16.5 percent for prescription drugs, and 14.1 percent for dental care (data not shown). Access to MH/SUDs care among full-year insured adults. These gaps in access to MH/SUDs care occurred despite high levels of health insurance coverage and strong connections to at least part of the health care system (Figure 8). Nearly all (96.1 percent) of adults seeking MH/SUDs care had health insurance coverage at the time of the survey and 84.6 percent had health insurance coverage for all of the previous 12 months. Most (88.1 percent) reported having a place they usually go when they are sick or need advice about their health (excluding the ED) and most (89.2 percent) had an outpatient health care visit in the past 12 months, suggesting strong connections to the health care system for their physical health. Focusing on adults with health insurance coverage all year, it is clear that health insurance does not guarantee access to MH/SUDs care (Figure 9). As was true for all adults who sought MH/SUDs care, more than half (54.6 percent) of all full-year insured adults who sought MH/SUDs care reported difficulty obtaining such care and more than onethird (38.7 percent) reported going without needed MH/ SUDs care. Went without needed MH/SUDs care Had an emergency department visit for MH/SUDs care 33.3% 12.7% 13.2% ALL ADULTS FULL-YEAR INSURED ADULTS Difficulty getting an appointment is defined as sometimes or never getting an appointment as soon as needed. [ 4 ]

DISCUSSION According to the 2018 MHRS, almost one in six Massachusetts adults sought MH/SUDs care for themselves over the past 12 months, with more than half reporting difficulty finding an MH/SUDs provider who would see them, and nearly 40 percent reporting going without needed MH/SUDs care. 15 Having health insurance coverage did little to mitigate gaps in access to MH/SUDs care. The difficulties in obtaining MH/SUDs care reported in the MHRS are consistent with findings from earlier studies that documented persistent barriers to outpatient MH/SUDs care in the Commonwealth. 16,17 Consumers in Massachusetts who seek MH/SUDs care have difficulty finding providers who will see them and getting an appointment in a timely manner when they do, resulting in some going without needed MH/ SUDs care or seeking that care in the ED. Several factors are seen as creating barriers to MH/SUDs care in Massachusetts, including a geographic mismatch in MH/SUDs provider supply across areas of the state, the fragmented MH/SUDs care system, and an unwillingness on the part of some MH/SUDs providers to accept health insurance (e.g., MassHealth). A 2016 2017 survey of outpatient mental health providers in Massachusetts found that 45 percent of providers did not accept MassHealth, 38 percent did not accept Medicare, and 16 percent did not accept commercial insurance. 18 Massachusetts has programs underway that are intended to expand the overall supply of MH/SUDs providers and address the geographic mismatch among providers (e.g., student loan repayment programs and investments in community mental health centers, behavioral health community partners, and telehealth, along with expanded SUD services and training). Expanding the number of providers who are willing to take health insurance coverage, particularly MassHealth, likely will require an increase in MH/SUDs reimbursement rates, along with simplified administrative processes to make participation in insurance programs and provision of treatment for patients less onerous on providers. [ 5 ]

ENDNOTES 1 Unfortunately, there is no consensus on the appropriate definition of the behavioral health workforce and no data source that captures all components of the workforce. The most consistent data source is the Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, although the OES does not capture members of the workforce who are selfemployed and does not have data for all states in all years. Using 2017 OES data for psychiatrists; psychologists; marriage and family therapists; substance abuse, behavioral disorder, and mental health counselors; and mental health and substance abuse social workers, we find that Massachusetts has 3.6 behavioral health workers per 1,000 population. This compares with 1.6 for the 36 other states with complete data for the seven categories we included in the behavioral health workforce. 2 Sirkin, J.T., McClellan, S.R., Hunt, M., Sheedy, K., Hoffman, C., & Olsho, L. (2017). Quantifying wait times for outpatient mental health services in Massachusetts: provider and organizational characteristics associated with access. Boston (MA): Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Foundation. Available at https://bluecrossmafoundation.org/sites/default/files/ download/publication/quant_mh_wait_times_report_v07_final.pdf. 3 Citino, C., Gibbons, K., Hugo, M., Balasalle, J., & Kirsners, E. (2015). The challenges of private practice: a study of clinicians experiences providing mental health care in Massachusetts. Hadley (MA): University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute. Available at http://www.donahue.umassp.edu/documents/final_cu_report_4_21_15.pdf. 4 In the MHRS, mental health (MH) care includes counseling, therapy, and other treatments or medications for any MH condition or emotional problem; substance use disorder (SUD) care includes counseling, therapy, and other treatments or medications for an alcohol or drug use problem. 5 In the MHRS, MH/SUDs providers refers to any provider from whom the individual sought MH/SUDs care, regardless of the provider s area of specialty. 6 Keeter, S., Hatley, N., Kennedy, C., & Lau, A. (2017). What low response rates mean for telephone surveys. Washington (DC): Pew Research Center. Available at http://www.pewresearch.org/2017/05/15/what-low-response-rates-mean-fortelephone-surveys/. 7 Pew Research Center. (2012). Assessing the representativeness of public opinion surveys. Washington (DC): Pew Research Center. Available at http://www.people-press.org/2012/05/15/assessing-the-representativeness-of-public-opinion-surveys. 8 For example, a similar random-digit dial (RDD) survey conducted in 2017 in three states yielded response rates of 12 percent (Indiana), 14 percent (Ohio), and 17 percent (Kansas). See Sommers, B., Fry, C., Blendon, R., & Epstein, A. New approaches in Medicaid: work requirements, health savings accounts, and health care access. Health Affairs, 37(7):1099 1106. 9 For more information on the MHRS methodology, see https://bluecrossmafoundation.org/sites/default/files/2018%20 MHRS%20Methodology%20Report.pdf. 10 In this brief, the summary measures of health care access and use include data from the new MH/SUDs questions and so may differ from summary measures for the 2018 MHRS reported elsewhere that do not include those data. 11 Although we do not have a recent estimate of the scope of behavioral health needs for adults in Massachusetts, the 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) estimates that 18.9 percent of adults 18 and older in the United States have an MH issue, 7.2 percent have an SUD, and 3.4 percent have a co-occurring MH issue and SUD. For more details on NSDUH estimates, see: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2018). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: results from the 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. SMA 18-5068, NSDUH Series H-53). Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Available at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2017-nsduh-annualnational-report. 12 The percentages are calculated as the ratio of 15.3 to 15.9 and 2.2 to 15.9, respectively. 13 An MH/SUDs limitation is defined as having an MH/SUDs issue that kept the individual from working or doing their usual activities for any of the previous 30 days. 14 The MHRS asked about unmet need for (1) MH services, (2) treatment for alcohol or drug use, (3) prescriptions for a medication for MH care, and (4) prescriptions for medications for alcohol or drug treatment. We consider the first two categories to be unmet need for MH/SUDs services and the four categories combined to be unmet need for MH/SUDs care. 15 As noted above, these estimates likely underestimate the full scope of the problem because some Massachusetts adults reporting MH/SUDs issues appear to have been discouraged from seeking care. Further, because of the sensitivity of the issue, we would expect MH/SUDs issues to be underestimated in a phone survey. 16 Sirkin, et al. (2017). 17 Citino, et al. (2015). 18 Sirkin, et al. (2017). [ 6 ]