Appalachian Maryland. Appalachian Regional Commission Investment Strategy Statement

Similar documents
The North Carolina Appalachian Regional Commission Program North Carolina Department of Commerce

What is the Northeast Saying about Rural Entrepreneurship? Martin Shields Acting Director, Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development

Regional Development Plans

Rural Grants Program (

Business Meeting 2016 Year in Review. April 26, 2017

Allegany County Chamber of Commerce Strategic Marketing Plan

DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ASSOCIATION OF APPALACHIA

STATE OF MARYLAND APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Economic Trends and Florida s Competitive Position

Economic Development Strategic Plan Executive Summary Delta County, CO. Prepared By:

Economic Trends and Florida s Competitive Position

Update on HB2 Preparation. Presentation to FAMPO May, 2016

Collaborations with UNC

ARC S POWER INITIATIVE: AN OVERVIEW APRIL 5, 2016

Kansas Association of Regional Development Organizations EDA Programs

Metrics Goal Actual Goal Actual Goal Actual Goal

CEDS Staff Members Leanne Mazer Guy Winterberg Darlene Steyer Ryan Davis Amy Jacobs Christie Wakefield

Economic Development Concept Plan

$787 Billion Economic Recovery Package Clears Congress; Focuses On Long- Term Competitiveness, in Addition to Job Creation

employment generation: Nepalese scenario

Request for Proposals. Haywood County Broadband Assessment and Feasibility Study

Prosperity and Growth Strategy for Northern Ontario

Concept Paper for ANN VISTA Project for FY 2012 Submitted

Technical Report 2: Synthesis of Existing Plans

Tapping into the programs of the EDA

A SNAPSHOT OF NACo AND NADO S TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE EFFORTS IN APPALACHIA

Department of Economic Development SMARTPeople. SMARTBusiness.

CEDS Staff Members Leanne Mazer Guy Winterberg Darlene Steyer Ryan Davis Amy Jacobs

Enterprise Zone Application. The Town of Chestertown. and The County of Kent

Current Funding Opportunities. About NCM USA/Canada. January In This Issue. Happy New Year!

Multi-disciplinary Collaboration to Drive Economic Development

South East Action Plan for Jobs. Submission on. Ireland 2040 Our Plan: National Planning Framework (Stage 2)

J. Andrew Hansz. Ph.D., CFA, MAI Gazarian Real Estate Center Craig School of Business California State University, Fresno

Economic Development Strategy

Kenneth E. Poole, PhD. National Conference of State Legislators August 11, 2012

May 25, Prosperity and Growth Strategy for Northern Ontario

Goal Macro Measures Objectives Tasks/Strategies Comments

FY 2018 ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICTS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS GUIDELINES

2012 Heritage Action Plan Grant Program Schuylkill River Heritage Towns & Tours

Economic Development Element

Small Business Resource Guide for Monroe County, Ohio

Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Annual Performance Report for Northeastern Pennsylvania

@MDCounties

Model Community Health Needs Assessment and Implementation Strategy Summaries

Regional Economic Development Commissions/Partnerships

E c o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t P r o b l e m s a n d O p p o r t u n i t i e s

Hagerstown-Washington County Economic Development Commission. Hagerstownedc.org

Economic Development and Job Creation Programs in Minnesota

North Dakota Economic Growth

APPALACHIAN REGIONAL COMMISSION and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION

Request for Proposal: Grant Writing Services

Mississippi State University

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Business Commons

Durham Region Toronto Buffalo. Cleveland Pittsburgh

Business Incentives and Economic Development Expenditures: An Overview of Delaware s Program Investments and Outcomes Summary

Smart Specialisation in the Region of Attica

Emerging Opportunities for Economic Diversification in Coal-Reliant Regions

Building the Next Metropolitan Centre. The City of Surrey Economic Strategy Overview

Economic Development Strategy

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 2 HOUSE BILL 68* Committee Substitute Favorable 4/19/17. Short Title: BRIGHT Futures Act.

MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS CENTER & TEXTILE TECHNOLOGY CENTER:

Business Development Competitive Grant Pilot Program

Enterprise Zone Application. The Town of Chestertown. and The County of Kent

2017 POLICY DOCUMENT. Advance Queensland: Foundations for the Future. Putting Queenslanders First

Partnership for Fair Caregiver Wages

Middle Rio Grande Economic Development Association a progress report

Chapter 5 Planning for a Diversified Economy 5 1

Empire State Development Programs /13/2017

IEDC State of Federal Economic Development. Jeffrey A. Finkle, CEcD President & CEO International Economic Development Council

Sublette County Economic Development Master Plan. June 2015

Vision & Mission Statement FY 2018 Budget Testimony Bureau of Economic Research Website... 10

Request for Proposals

National Policies on Ensuring the Economic Empowerment of Women in Libya

Community Development Needs Assessment

BUTTE COUNTY REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY UPDATE

Results of the Clatsop County Economic Development Survey

Maine s Economic Outlook: 2009 and Beyond

1. INTRODUCTION TO CEDS

March 9, Chairman Adolph, Chairman Markosek, and members of the Committee, it is good to be

Counting for Dollars: Jefferson County, Alabama

Appalachian Regional Commission Development Plan

MUNICIPALITY OF TRENT HILLS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT in KENTUCKY

Pennsylvania Local Government & Economic Development

TAX ABATEMENT GUIDELINES

Chamber. the. Executive Director. February Calendar

»» General Fund revenue allocation for transportation. »» TRANS bond renewal. »» Federal infrastructure funding

MEDC Strategic Plan Overview. October 26, 2011

ARLINGTON programs and incentives

Testimonials. ~ Karissa Kersey, Benefits and Compensation Manager, Trihydro, Corporation

The New Carolina Initiative

DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING COMMUNITY STRATEGIES

REGION 5 INFORMATION FOR PER CAPITA AND COMPETITIVE GRANT APPLICANTS Updated April, 2018

Economic Analysis of Proposals to Limit the Municipal Bond Market: 501(c)(3) Issuance

Linking Natural and Cultural Assets in the Upper New River Valley

COLORADO FIRST AND EXISTING INDUSTRY CUSTOMIZED TRAINING PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2014 REPORT TO THE JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE

SWOT Analysis. North Aegean Region

K-12 Statewide Longitudinal Data System, AH

2014 UPDATE. Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy EAST TEXAS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce 2012 Legislative Policies

Transcription:

Appalachian Maryland Appalachian Regional Commission Investment Strategy Statement Federal Fiscal Year 2019 September 2018

Submitted by the Office of the Governor, State of Maryland Larry Hogan, Governor Boyd Rutherford, Lt. Governor Prepared by the Maryland Department of Planning Wendi W. Peters, Special Secretary of Smart Growth Governor Hogan Alternate to ARC

I. Introduction The Maryland Appalachian region consists of three counties (Garrett, Allegany, and Washington) along with their twenty-four municipalities. The Appalachian Regional Commission uses an index-based county economic classification system to identify and monitor the economic status of Appalachian counties. The system compares each county's averages for three economic indicators three-year average unemployment rate, per capita market income, and poverty rate with national averages. The resulting values are summed and averaged to create a composite index value for each county. Each county in the nation is then ranked, based on its composite index value. Counties are designated as distressed, at-risk, transitional, competitive, or attainment, based on their ranking in the index. Designations are revised annually using the most current data available. The Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) has designated Garrett, Allegany, and Washington Counties as Transitional for FY 2017. Transitional counties are those transitioning between strong and weak economies. Transitional counties rank economically between the lowest 25 percent and the highest 25 percent of the nation's counties. The required match for Area Development Projects in transitional counties is 50%. Manufacturing is still a major part of the region s workforce, but large companies today employ 300-400 people instead of 1,500, and a plant closing does not devastate the region as it once did. Other major industries of the past such as mining and agriculture are being supplemented with new and emerging tourism efforts, information technology, Cyber- Security, Autonomous Technology, Bio-Tech industry and related businesses. Improving access for local businesses to regional and national markets is an essential component of the region s economic development strategy. Therefore, the completion of Figure 1 Route 219 Construction Page 2

the Appalachian Development Highway System, specifically Route 219 in Maryland and Pennsylvania, is a critical part of this effort. Similarly, broadband development that can carry information, voice and data at a reasonable cost is part of this region s 21 st century economic development strategy. Unfortunately, Western Maryland has critical final linkages that need to be completed to attract and retain businesses. The three counties of Western Maryland now suffer more from underemployment than unemployment and our local and state leadership understands that technology related infrastructure with a focus on education and workforce training is the key to higher paying jobs, population growth and ultimately the building of a sustainable tax base. Frostburg State University (FSU), the only state university located in Appalachian Maryland, has played a key role in addressing the education and labor force training needs of the region. Additionally, the University of Maryland System operates a satellite campus in downtown Hagerstown that complements FSU s efforts. Within each of the three counties, there are community colleges which work directly with Frostburg State as well as the local Boards of Education enhancing the region s labor force. The focus at all levels of education is academic excellence, with the objective of growing our own workforce by fostering entrepreneurism. Furthermore, FSU has a new area of focus, in establishing an Economic Out Reach Office that will coordinate economic efforts of attracting technology jobs to the region. They have established an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle program that will partner with the establishment of an Autonomous Technology Center at the Greater Cumberland Regional Airport. A University of Maryland Feasibility study has shown that building a Autonomous Technology Center will bring tech companies to the area for testing and research. Planning conducted a series of workshops to gather information for the creation of A Better Maryland plan for the state. The information attained for western Maryland included input on economic development strategies. Improvements to broadband, tourism, workforce training and housing were identified as ways to grow the local economy. The Tri-County Council for Western Maryland, the only Local Development District (LDD) in the state, serves as an advisory body to the development of this strategic plan. The Page 3

Appalachian Maryland State Implementing Strategy Statement and Investment Program for Federal Fiscal Year 2018 reflects the needs as addressed by the State of Maryland, Tri- County Council, and the three County departments of economic development. This Strategy Statement outlines our approach to the types of projects to be submitted and the process of submittal, review and approval. II. Strategic Goals and Objectives The Appalachian Maryland State Implementing Strategy utilizes the following project development process: A. Projects need to meet the ARC Goals and State Objectives detailed in the States Appalachian Development Plan. For more information on ARC and their Goals and Objectives visit their web site at: www.arc.gov B. Projects need to consider State Policies on Growth and Resource Protection as detailed in the States Appalachian Development Plan. C. Projects need to consider the policies and priorities identified in the State Appalachian Development Plan, a copy can be found at www.tccwmd.org D. Project Review and Selection Process ARC projects are requested from county and local government, non-profits and educational institutions in February. Project descriptions are submitted to the respective county commissioners for review and priority ranking. County project priorities should be submitted to the district by end of May. Tri-County Council staff and the Maryland Department of Planning s ARC Program Manager review, collate, and rank the projects based upon the six set criteria listed below. A project package is then developed by Tri-County Council staff and the ARC Program Manager. In June, the ranked project priority list is submitted to the full board of Tri County Council, which may make changes and approve the final priority list for submittal to the state. The Maryland ARC Alternate reviews the project package and submits the final project list to ARC. In late August, eligible projects are invited to apply for funding. All projects that are in a fundable position should have applications submitted to the ARC Program Manager no later than mid-november. 1. Project Readiness Project ranking is subject to the readiness of the project. Projects that have identified matching funds and can have ARC applications submitted within 90 days of notice of funding will be given priority. If a project becomes stalled and unable to be initiated during the projected timetable, the next highest-ranking project that meets the funding criteria will be selected. Page 4

2. Degree of Need Projects must meet some degree of need within guidelines of the ARC Goals and Objectives to be considered for funding. The degree of need is determined by the overall economic impact a project will have on the region. Projects that contribute to meeting multiple ARC and State Goals and Objectives should be given priority when ranking projects. 3. The State Targeted Investment Priorities Projects that can demonstrate that they will contribute to improving or increasing the economic impact of the targeted investment priorities identified will be given priority in rankings for funding. The State Targeted Investment Priorities are: Figure 2 Sideling Hill Visitor Center a. Technology development including the continuation of building a broadband network; cyber-security and autonomous technology b. Education and workforce training c. Contribute to or increase the economic impact of tourism in the region d. Development of Bio-Tech industries e. Health care services 4. Project Evaluation/Prioritization All projects considered for funding should be one-time cost programs including educational projects. ARC funding should not be used to support administrative programs, staff salaries, or ongoing costs, except for regional, State or ARC special initiatives, the Local Development District Administrative grants, and certain Technical Assistance Projects. 5. Scope and Cost Effectiveness The evaluation includes a specific focus on the scope of the project and the return on the investment. The scope includes a detailed assessment of the overall project with specific goals addressed and desired results to be returned. Page 5

6. Degree of Distress All three of Maryland s Counties are considered transitional and are limited to no more than 50% funding from ARC. Projects are evaluated based upon the degree of distress that will be alleviated. Generally, the degree of distress is a measure of unemployment or per capita income. Various factors must be considered when evaluating for distress. Things to consider are instances of natural disaster, the closing of major employers, and the broadness of the geographic region the project tends to cover. Projects that impact the entire region (three counties) will have a greater effect on the overall health of the Appalachian Area. It stands to reason that areas with the greatest level of distress will benefit most from these projects. 7. Percent of Non-ARC Funds Project costs are limited to include no more than 50% funding from ARC for transitional counties. All three western Maryland counties Garrett, Allegany and Washington are designated transitional. Special consideration is given to projects that use ARC funding as a small minority of the total project cost. III Conclusion In summary, the Appalachian Regional Commission program in Maryland, under the direction of the Governor s office and management of the Maryland Department of Planning, will continue to emphasize self-sustaining economic development and job growth. This will be accomplished consistent with the ARC Goals and Objectives identified within this Strategy Statement and the 2016-2020 Maryland Appalachian Development Plan. Page 6