NSF DAHLGREN. Joint Land Use Study. Executive Summary

Similar documents
City of Huntsville Michelle Gilliam Jordan, AICP Planning Director Scott Erwin Planner II Ashley Nichols Planner III

Air Installation Compatible Land Use Zone. Beale Air Force Base California Citizen s Brochure

UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS CORRIDOR STUDY

Compatibility Planning Near Military Bases (S562) Sponsored by Zoning Practice. APA National Planning Conference Monday, April 16, 2012

Air Installations Compatible Use Zones Study. Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska

Goals and Objectives. What is a Joint Land Use Study? The California JLUS Program. R-2508 Complex-Overview

NAVAL BASE VENTURA COUNTY POINT MUGU AICUZ STUDY

Establish a regional entity charged with enhancing the relationship between the military and civilian communities

THE MILITARY'S IMPACT ON COASTAL DEVELOPMENT: THE NEED FOR REGIONAL COLLABORATION

NAS North Island WELCOME. Open House Public Meeting

ENCROACHMENT STUDY COMMITTEE. Key Findings & Recommendations

Joint Base San Antonio: Randolph AFB

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2016 Legislative Session

MCAS BEAUFORT SUSTAINABLE RANGES BRIEF MCAS BEAUFORT COMMUNITY PLANS AND LIAISON OFFICE (CP&L)

LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS HENDRY COUNTY

EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE JOINT LAND USE STUDY DRAFT NOT FINAL

JOINING FORCES ALIGNING COMMUNITY & MILITARY MISSIONS

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 484

Hampton Roads Region Joint Land Use Study Norfolk / Virginia Beach

Welcome Scoping Meeting U.S. Navy Environmental Impact Statement for the EA-18G Growler Airfield Operations at Naval Air Station (NAS) Whidbey Island

Regional Joint Land Use Study Implementation Strategy

MEMORANDUM FOR: MITIGATION OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MEMBERS -~ 'fly

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT:

Compatible Development Surrounding Joint Base McGuire/Dix/Lakehurst

4.6 NOISE Impact Methodology Factors Considered for Impact Analysis. 4.6 Noise

Outdoor Research, Development, Test & Evaluation Activities

REPORT ON THE IMPACT OF THE SUNZIA SOUTHWEST TRANSMISSION PROJECT ON CURRENT AND FUTURE CAPABILITIES OF WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE, NEW MEXICO

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/PROPOSALS SUBASE NEW LONDON JOINT LAND USE STUDY (JLUS) IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT

Bowman Field Airport Area Safety Program

Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics

DOD INSTRUCTION THE READINESS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INTEGRATION (REPI) PROGRAM AND ENCROACHMENT MANAGEMENT

4.17 PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY

Northwest Phoenix Valley Communities Quality of Life and the F-35

Federal Register Comment Summary FR Comment BOI Response July Commenter # Commenter Name DATE

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Request for Proposals

Partners for a Compatible Future NAF El Centro

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

2 Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives

Sustaining the Readiness of North Carolina s Military September 10, 2013

TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH PROTOCOL FOR ESTABLISHING TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES

Joint Land Use Study Report

TOWNSEND BOMBING RANGE MODERNIZATION

Paul Paine Chairman, NAS Fort Worth, JRB Regional Coordination Committee Chairman, Texas Military Preparedness Commission.

Joint Base San Antonio: Camp Bullis

Camp Crowder. Training Center HARRY S TRUMAN COORDINATING COUNCIL

Growler Aircraft Operations at NAS Whidbey Island and OLF Coupeville

Ray Garza C.M. JLUS Project Manager April 12, 2017

CAIS Trustee Head Conference 2014 Developing a Successful Project Entitlements Team & Strategy

NAVY BIRD/ANIMAL AIRCRAFT STRIKE HAZARD PROGRAM IMPLEMENTING GUIDANCE

NAVAL STATION MAYPORT February 2017

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA

City of Del Rio and Laughlin AFB

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

APPENDIX 1 BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES

City of Lynwood MODIFIED REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration (REPI) Program Overview. NMFWA Webinar 16 July 2013

JOINT BASE ANDREWS, MARYLAND

Performance Improvement in the Review and Permitting of Renewable Energy Infrastructure Projects. The Department of Defense s Plan

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

CITY OF HOOD RIVER NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING REQUIREMENT

Agenda Item No. October 14, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is con

METHODOLOGY - Scope of Work

Subj: READINESS SUSTAINMENT AND COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM

NOW THEREFORE, the parties enter into the following Agreement:

COMMANDER S GUIDE COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. Strategy on Environmental Justice

Part 150 Advisory Circular Update

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT

Joint Basing Execution

City of San Diego Master Plans for the Montgomery-Gibbs Executive and Brown Field Airports Public Involvement Plan

Planning Commission Public Hearing Exhibits. Powers Ready Mix Plant Oldcastle SW Group, Inc.

Airport Zoning Regulation to Protect Hospital Helicopter Flight Paths- Final Report. Planning and Growth Management Committee

PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT:

Public-Public Partnerships: Shared Services Between Communities and Military Installations. Fred Meurer.

CITY OF ORANGE LOCAL CEQA GUIDELINES

SECTION 2.0 INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION

Public Draft September 2018

Six ele ents are critical to accomplishing the mission at Luke AFB. Each of the six elements is

Great Peninsula Conservancy Strategic Plan November 17, 2015

The Department of Defense and American Wind Power: Partners in Protecting National Security and Military Readiness

The Maryland Transportation Authority has. Staff Approve Resolution R to amend the FY TIP.

Military Organizational Structures

Guide to Rezoning. Step 1. Step 2. Step 5. Step 6. Step 7. Step 8

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

This interim change updates the paragraph titles of Section 7.

DOVER AIR FORCE BASE & THE DELMARVA PENINSULA:

FORT RUCKER / WIREGRASS AREA JOINT LAND USE STUDY October 2009

Navy Operational Range Clearance (ORC) Plans Improve Sustainability A Case Study

REPORT. To the Honorable Mayor and City Council From the City Manager. May 9, 2016

Hurricane Evacuation Clearance Workshop Meeting 3 April 30, 2012 Minutes 10am 6:00pm

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Distinctly Boerne! Boerne Master Plan ( ) JOINT MEETING OVERVIEW & PRIORITIZATION

GA Airports Are Economic Engines

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM (NAS)

CHAPTER 6 Construction Traffic Management Program. Overview

Transcription:

Executive Summary

Naval Support Facility Dahlgren JLUS Overview The Naval Support Facility () Dahlgren (JLUS) was conducted as a collaborative planning effort that included the following project partners: Virginia Promoting community planning; and Encouraging cooperation between the military installation and community officials. The JLUS was undertaken in an effort to develop a set of recommendations that would prevent or mitigate encroachment in the areas surrounding Dahlgren. The JLUS recommendations help protect the installations military missions, and the public s health, safety, welfare, quality of life, and economic stability of the communities. King George County Westmoreland County Town of Colonial Beach Maryland Charles County St. Mary s County The intent of this planning effort is to establish and foster an on-going working relationship among Dahlgren and neighboring communities. The JLUS was developed under the guidance of three main objectives: UNDERSTANDING. Increase communication between the military, local jurisdictions, and stakeholders to promote an understanding of the strong economic and physical relationship between Dahlgren and their neighbors. COLLABORATION. Promote collaborative planning between the military, local jurisdictions, and stakeholders in order to ensure a consistent approach in addressing compatibility issues. ACTIONS. Develop and implement strategies for reducing the impacts of incompatible activities on the community and military operations. Design tools to support compatibility in the future. The JLUS effort can directly benefit Dahlgren and the surrounding region by: Protecting the health and safety of surrounding residents and workers; Preserving long-term land use compatibility between Dahlgren and the surrounding communities; 2 Dahlgren Dahlgren Potomac River Range Collaborative Planning The JLUS planning process was designed to create a locally relevant plan that builds consensus and obtains support from the various stakeholders involved. The general public was instrumental in the development of this JLUS by providing their perspective and feedback, both in the JLUS public workshops and through the use of the interactive project website. The development of the project was also guided by two committees composed of community and military stakeholder representatives. These two committees were the Policy Committee, which provided project oversight, guidance, JLUS public workshop and decision-making, and the Technical Advisory Group, which assisted in the identification and assessment of compatibility issues, the creation of recommendations, and the overall report development.

Executive Summary JLUS Recommended Strategies The heart of the Dahlgren JLUS is the set of 77 recommended strategies that address compatibility issues. Since the Dahlgren JLUS is the result of a collaborative planning process, the strategies represent a true consensus plan; a realistic and coordinated approach to compatibility planning developed with the support of stakeholders involved throughout the process. The key to implementing strategies is establishing a JLUS Implementation Coordinating Committee to oversee the JLUS execution and coordinate strategies with multiple partners. Concurrent with the efforts of the JLUS Implementation Coordinating Committee, each Area jurisdiction is responsible for establishing their own course of action to execute strategies unique to them through collaboration of planners, leadership, and the public. Since the Implementation Plan is intended to be a living document, each jurisdiction has the flexibility to revise and refine the Plan for their unique circumstances and use for tracking implementation actions and progress. A key strategy to guide compatible development without overregulation is a zoning overlay district, titled Military Compatibility Area (MCA) Overlay District. The maps on the following pages illustrate the geographic boundaries of the overlay district and its compatibility sub areas. The strategies that were developed during the JLUS process are described in detail in Chapter 6 of the JLUS Report, beginning on page 67. The following list provides highlights of some of the strategies identified. Communications Establish a JLUS Implementation Coordination Committee to provide oversight and monitoring of the JLUS implementation Incorporate Dahlgren in the Review of Development Applications / Proposals Develop Memorandum of Agreement for Multiple Land Management Agencies Establish an Dahlgren Outreach Program including a Good Neighbor Program Provide Public Versions of Key Planning Documents for Review and Comment by Jurisdictions Share Military Operational Brochures with Community Improve Informational Signage of Military Activities. Energy Development Consider Development of Alternative Energy Development Ordinances to Coordinate Siting Within Military Compatibility Areas Identify and Map Locations Suitable for Wind Energy Development Coordinate With Wind Developers to Reach an Agreement that Supports Wind Energy and Military Missions Coordinate Alternative Energy Development Applications with DOD Siting Clearinghouse Housing Availability Incorporate Transient Housing Needs in Comprehensive Plans Investigate the Feasibility of a Local Government / Navy / Private Development Project to Build Navy Rental Housing Land / Air / Sea Space Competition Willing Property Owners to Secure Future Use of Existing Sites of Range Stations Expand Outreach to Boating Community Evaluate the Purchase of Land or Easements from Develop Clear Zones, Accident Potential Zones, and Imaginary Surfaces for the Runway Establish economic development marketing guidelines that identify the type of industries that are compatible with the Dahlgren mission Develop an information packet for property owners that identify JLUS issues regarding land development concerns that could impact or be impacted by Dahlgren operations Light And Glare Develop and Establish Dark Sky Lighting Ordinance Noise Identify Noise Compatibility Policies for Inclusion in Local Planning Documents Incorporate Noise Contour Maps and Compatibility Policies Into Local Planning Documents Develop Noise Informational Brochure for Base Operations Educate Local Builders on Sound Attenuation Roadway Capacity Conduct a Traffic to Assess Community Impacts on Dahlgren and Vice Versa Conduct a Feasibility to Assess Viability of Public Transit to Dahlgren Seek Alternative Funding Sources for Transportation Improvements Safety Consider the Development of an EMS Response to Accurately Quantify and Classify Specific Issues and Impacts 3

Dahlgren Military Compatibility Area Overlay District (MCAOD) Mainside Dahlgren Proposed Zoning Overlay The MCAOD for Dahlgren consists of the following four MCAs (Military Compatibility Areas), which are described on pages 6 and 7 of this brochure: Safety Noise Vertical Obstruction Energy Development 4 King George Explosive Experimental Area Colonial Beach

Executive Summary 5

Military Compatibility Areas In compatibility planning, the term Military Compatibility Area (MCA) is used to formally designate a geographic area where military operations may impact local communities, and conversely, where local activities may affect the military s ability to conduct its mission. The MCAs are geographic areas where specific types of recommended JLUS strategies apply. An MCA is designated to accomplish the following: Promote an orderly transition between community and military land uses so that land uses remain compatible. Protect public health, safety, and welfare. Maintain operational capabilities of military installations and areas. Promote an awareness of the size and scope of military training areas to protect areas separate from the actual military installation (i.e., critical air space) used for training purposes. Establish compatibility requirements within the designated area, such as requirements for sound attenuation and avigation easements. 6 An MCA delineates a geographic area where strategies are recommended to support compatibility planning and JLUS goal and objectives. The Military Compatibility Area Overlay District (MCAOD) is a zoning technique that ensures the JLUS strategies are applied to the appropriate areas, and that locations deemed not subject to a specific compatibility issue are not adversely impacted by regulations or policies inappropriate for their location or circumstance. The MCAOD encompasses all the MCAs and its geographic boundary is defined by the largest MCA boundary. The MCAOD, when used by local jurisdictions, can address ways to prevent or mitigate compatibility issues. Each jurisdiction s MCAOD boundary is determined by the largest geographic boundary of all the MCAs that fall within their jurisdiction.

Executive Summary Safety Military Compatibility Area The Safety MCA addresses areas that could be affected by aircraft associated with military flight operations. The Safety MCA comprises two components the Bird / Wildlife Aircraft Strike Hazard (BASH) Relevancy Area and Clear Zones associated with the airfield. The Clear Zones are a subzone of the MCA and do not extend outside the installation boundary. Because of the aircraft types and frequency of use at Dahlgren there are no Accident Potential Zones (I and II) normally associated with an airfield. The safety profile at Dahlgren would need to be adjusted with the reintroduction of fixed wing aircraft at Dahlgren dependent on future runway needs and likely result in expanded safety zones including the addition of Accident Potential Zones. Vertical Obstruction Military Compatibility Area The flight operations approach and departure areas are regulated by stringent height restrictions defined by FAA and military regulations. The Vertical Obstruction MCA is based on the FAA inner horizontal surface which addresses development of buildings and structures from zero to 150 feet above mean sea level, and the approach-departure clearance surface up to 150 feet. The Vertical Obstruction MCA is intended to emphasize the importance of following FAA imaginary surfaces with regard to structure height and is not intended to reduce or change FAA guidance with regard to maximum height of structures. Noise Military Compatibility Area The Noise MCA includes all land located off installation within noise contours greater than 120 peak decibel noise levels associated with military activities, as well as an additional onehalf mile buffer outside the 120 decibel peak noise contour to be proactive for possible future Dahlgren operational changes. This buffer incorporates land areas that may pose a risk for noise complaints to occur. Energy Development Military Compatibility Area The Energy Development MCA is an area characterized by existing, proposed, or potential areas for alternative wind energy development or other types of proposed structures that may have an impact on the radar line-of-sight requirement between Dahlgren and the Navy tracking station in Northumberland County, Virginia. Wind turbines within this line of sight could create frequency interference issues that conflict with military operations. This area illustrated in Figure 8, traverses Westmoreland County in Virginia. Wind energy development such as wind turbines and transmission towers in this area should be coordinated with Dahlgren. 7

Background Report JLUS Report For Additional Information Contact: Department of Community Development King George County 10459 Courthouse Drive, Suite 104 King George, VA 22485 P. 540.775.7111 www.king-george.va.us Executive Summary JLUS Resources Several JLUS resources providing different levels of information are available to the public, elected and appointed officials, and the military. These resources provide an overview of the JLUS process, detailed information on Dahlgren and the overall study area, an assessment of existing compatibility issues, and the recommended implementation plan. The resource documents include: JLUS Report The JLUS Report presents an overview of the JLUS planning process, purpose and objectives of the study and the recommended implementation plan. The report presents a concise description of the following: JLUS project study area, including Dahlgren mission overviews; King George County, Westmoreland County, Town of Colonial Beach, Charles County and St. Mary s County, their demographic profile and market trends; Summary of the factors and encroachment issues identified during the JLUS process; and Set of recommended strategies to mitigate or prevent encroachment and proactively achieve land use compatibility. JLUS Background Report The Dahlgren JLUS Background Report provides the technical background and detailed compatibility assessment that was used to identify issues and develop JLUS recommendations. JLUS Executive Summary Brochure The JLUS Executive Summary Brochure serves as a quick reference describing the purpose of a JLUS and providing an overview of the key JLUS recommendations and Military Compatibility Areas. This study was prepared under contract with King George County, Virginia, with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content reflects the views of the key partners involved in the development of this study including the Town of Colonial Beach, VA, the counties of King George and Westmoreland, VA, and the counties of Charles and St. Mary s, MD, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment. 8 Rev. 2015_01_22