Hospital Pay for Performance (P4P) Program Guide

Similar documents
2018 Hospital Pay For Performance (P4P) Program Guide. Contact:

Hospital Quality Improvement Program (QIP)

Hospital Quality Improvement Program (QIP) Measurement Specifications for Large Hospitals ( 50 licensed general acute beds)

Hospital Quality Improvement Program (QIP) Measurement Specifications

State FY2013 Hospital Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Guide

2017 Quality Rewards Program

Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.2 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.3 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management

Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.3 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.5 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

An Overview of NCQA Relative Resource Use Measures. Today s Agenda

Hospital Quality Improvement Program (QIP) Measurement Specifications for Large Hospitals ( 50 general acute beds)

Understanding the Initiative Landscape in Medi-Cal. IHA Stakeholder Meeting September 23, 2016 Sarah Lally, Project Manager

Note: Every encounter type must have at least one value designated under the MU Details frame.

How BC s Health System Matrix Project Met the Challenges of Health Data

Total Cost of Care Technical Appendix April 2015

A. Encounter Data Submission Requirements

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Meaningful Use and the Impact on Netsmart s Behavioral Health Clients

PSI-15 Lafayette General Health 2017 Nicholas E. Davies Enterprise Award of Excellence

Medi-Cal APR-DRG Updates. Medi-Cal Updates. Agenda. Medi-Cal APR-DRG Updates Quality Assurance Fee (QAF) Program

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) The Harvard Pilgrim Independence Plan SM

BCBSM Physician Group Incentive Program

MEDICARE UPDATES: VBP, SNF QRP, BUNDLING

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

Meaningful Use Roadmap

Using the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF) PEPPER to Support Auditing and Monitoring Efforts: Session 1

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

Using the New Home Health Agency (HHA) PEPPER to Support Auditing and Monitoring Efforts

Paying for Outcomes not Performance

CMS Incentive Programs: Timeline And Reporting Requirements. Webcast Association of Northern California Oncologists May 21, 2013

Using Data for Proactive Patient Population Management

4/9/2016. The changing health care market THE CHANGING HEALTH CARE MARKET. CPAs & ADVISORS

WHA Risk-Adjusted All Cause Readmission Measure Specification Rev. Oct 2017

Payer s Perspective on Clinical Pathways and Value-based Care

2018 MIPS Quality Performance Category Measure Information for the 30-Day All-Cause Hospital Readmission Measure

Measure Applications Partnership

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

CPT only copyright 2014 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. 12/23/2014 Page 537 of 593

Potential Measures for the IPFQR Program and the Pre-Rulemaking Process. March 21, 2017

Strategic Alignment in Health Care

Executive Summary MEDICARE FEE-FOR-SERVICE (FFS) HOSPITAL READMISSIONS: QUARTER 4 (Q4) 2012 Q STATE OF CALIFORNIA

2016 PHYSICIAN QUALITY REPORTING OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES REGISTRY ONLY

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Meaningful Use FAQs for Behavioral Health

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

Hospital Quality Improvement Program (QIP)

2) The percentage of discharges for which the patient received follow-up within 7 days after

2017 Quality Reporting: Claims and Administrative Data-Based Quality Measures For Medicare Shared Savings Program and Next Generation ACO Model ACOs

ARRA New Opportunities for Community Mental Health

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Alaska Medicaid Program

Moving the Dial on Quality

Hospital Quality Improvement Program (QIP) Measurement Specifications for Small Hospitals (< 50 licensed general acute beds)

Quality ID #46 (NQF 0097): Medication Reconciliation Post-Discharge National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Episode Payment Models Final Rule & Analysis

STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

MACRA Frequently Asked Questions

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

MEDICARE CCLF ANALYTICS: MEDICARE ANALYTICS DATA ENGINE (MADE)

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

Medi-Cal Program. Benefit. Benefits Chart

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

Value Based P4P MY 2016 Total Cost of Care Preliminary Results. February 27, 2018 Lindsay Erickson, Director Thien Nguyen, Project Manager

2015 Executive Overview

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

The Drive Towards Value Based Care

FEE FOR SERVICE MEASURES

Using the Hospice PEPPER to Support Auditing and Monitoring Efforts: Session 1

Identifying and Treating Your High Risk Patient Population. Beth Hickerson Quality Improvement Advisor August 15, 2017

MEDICARE CCLF ANALYTICS: MEDICARE ANALYTICS DATA ENGINE (MADE)

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Measure #46 (NQF 0097): Medication Reconciliation Post-Discharge National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Reducing Readmissions: Potential Measurements

Mitzi Cardenas Sr. VP/Strategy, Business Development and Technology Truman Medical Centers

Legal Issues in Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Programss

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) January 21, 2010

Gateway to Practitioner Excellence GPE 2017 Medicaid & Medicare

Piloting Performance Measurement of Physician Organizations in Medi-Cal Managed Care: Findings and Implications

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

The Role of Analytics in the Development of a Successful Readmissions Program

Jumpstarting population health management

Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield Patient Centered Medical Home Provider Manual

DSRIP Demonstration Year 1, Quarter 1-2 Domain 1 Patient Engagement Data Request

19. Covered California Quality Improvement Strategy (QIS) - INSTRUCTIONS FOR DATA TEMPLATE

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program

New Quality Measures Will Soon Impact Nursing Home Compare and the 5-Star Rating System: What providers need to know

Emerging Outpatient CDI Drivers and Technologies

Prepared for North Gunther Hospital Medicare ID August 06, 2012

FY 2015 IPF PPS Final Rule: USING THE WEBEX Q+A FEATURE

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

HEDIS Ad-Hoc Public Comment: Table of Contents

DETAIL SPECIFICATION. Description. Numerator. Denominator. Exclusions. Minimum Data Reported to NHSN

Outcomes for Iowa Medicaid Chronic Condition Health Home Program Enrollees. Policy Report. SFYs February 2017

Program Overview

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version 1.0

Annual Reporting Requirements for PCMH Recognition Overview & Table Reporting Period: 4/3/ /31/2018

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Infection Monitoring: National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Bloodstream Infection in Hemodialysis Patients Clinical Measure

Transcription:

Hospital Pay for Performance (P4P) Program Guide Contact: QualityPrograms@iehp.org Published: January 14, 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS Program Overview Participation Requirements... 1 Financial Overview... 2 Payment Methodology... 3 Summary of Measures Manifest MedEx Active Data Sharing- Required Data Elements... 6 Manifest MedEx Active Data Sharing- Optional Data Elements... 7 Nulliparous Term Singleton Vertex (NTSV) Cesarean Delivery Rate... 9 Physicians Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Registry Forms Submission... 10 Plan All-Cause Readmissions (PCR) Observed-to-Expected Ratio... 11 Post-Discharge Follow-Up Within Seven Days of Discharge for High- Risk Members... 13

PROGRAM OVERVIEW Inland Empire Heath Plan (IEHP) is pleased to announce the second year of the Hospital Pay For Performance (Hospital P4P) Program for IEHP Medi-Cal contracted hospitals servicing Riverside and San Bernardino counties. The goal of the Hospital P4P Program is to provide financial rewards to hospitals that meet quality performance targets and demonstrate high-quality care to IEHP Members. The 2019 Hospital P4P Program is structured as an incentive program with quarterly performance measurement and payment. Payments are scaled to the volume of IEHP Member admissions per hospital. The 2019 program includes the six measures listed below. All measures are based on 2019 calendar year performance and are assessed on a quarterly schedule outlined in the Payment Methodology section. Manifest MedEx Active Data Sharing- Required Data Elements Manifest MedEx Active Data Sharing- Optional Data Elements Nulliparous Term Singleton Vertex (NTSV) Cesarean Delivery Rate Physicians Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Registry Forms Submission Plan All-Cause Readmissions (PCR) Observed-to-Expected Ratio Post-Discharge Follow-Up Within Seven Days of Discharge for High-Risk Members Participation Requirements Hospitals with an active IEHP contract for the Medi-Cal population (located within Riverside and San Bernardino counties) at the beginning of the measurement year (2019) are eligible for Program participation. Other program requirements include: Hospitals with maternity service lines must actively participate in the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) Maternal Data Center Reporting and sign a CMQCC authorization release to share hospital-level results with IEHP by February 15, 2019, if an authorization of release was not completed in the 2018 program year. Hospitals with no maternity service line are not eligible to receive incentive dollars for the NTSV Cesarean Delivery Rate measure. 1

Hospitals must provide Electronic Medical Record (EMR) access to IEHP to support concurrent review processes. Key information that should be available for viewing access by the IEHP concurrent review team includes: - History and Physical (H&P) - Labs - Medications - Updated clinical progress notes by all interdisciplinary teams - Orders - Ancillary notes (including SW, Psych, and PT/OT/ST notes) - Diagnostic procedures and results - Surgical procedures and outcomes - Case management notes - Discharge summary - Medication reconciliation upon discharge Financial Overview The annual budget for the 2019 Hospital P4P Program is $31 million in total possible payouts to qualifying hospitals that meet quality performance targets. The table below summarizes the Hospital P4P Program budget for the year and by dollars available per measure. Measures P4P PROGRAM BUDGET Total Dollars Available $31,000,000 MEASURE ALLOCATION Payment Frequency P4P Dollars Available per Measure Annual Budget MX Active Data Sharing- Required Data Elements Quarterly $1,000,000 $4,000,000 MX Active Data Sharing- Optional Data Elements Semi Annually $1,500,000 $3,000,000 NTSV C-Section Rate Quarterly $1,500,000 $6,000,000 POLST Registry Form Submission Quarterly $1,500,000 $6,000,000 PCR Observed-to-Expected Ratio Quarterly $1,500,000 $6,000,000 Seven-Day Discharge Follow Up Quarterly $1,500,000 $6,000,000 Annual Budget $31,000,000 2

Payment Methodology Eligible hospitals are evaluated quarterly on their performance in each of the P4P measures. Each measure is calculated following the guidelines listed in Summary of Measures section of this guide. Hospital performance is assessed based on the established performance goals. Below is a chart of the Hospital P4P Program measures and their performance goals. For measures that have two-tier performance goals, 50 percent of the available measure dollars are rewarded for reaching Tier 1 level performance and 100 percent of the available measure dollars are rewarded for reaching Tier 2 level performance. For measures that have only one performance goal, 100 percent of the available measure dollars are rewarded for meeting the goal rate. MEASURE NAME DATA SOURCE MX Active Data Sharing- Required Data Elements MX Active Data Sharing- Optional Data Elements Manifest MedEx Manifest MedEx 2019 PERFORMANCE GOALS All conditions must be met: 1) Hospitals must have a current PA in place with MX NTSV C-Section Rate CMQCC* Less than or equal to 23.9% POLST Registry Form Submission PCR Observed-to- Expected Ratio Seven-Day Discharge Follow-Up POLST Registry IEHP Claims & Encounters IEHP Claims & Encounters 2) Hospitals are actively sharing required data elements with MX per quarter 3) Hospitals consistently submitting all required data elements for all hospital events throughout the entire measurement period Tier 1: Hospitals actively sharing optional data elements for all hospital events by 12/1/2019 Tier 2: Hospitals actively sharing optional data elements for all hospital events by 6/30/2019 POLST forms submitted by hospital must be 10% of IEHP adult admissions per quarter Hospital PCR O/E ratio <1.0 per quarter Tier 1: 10% improvement over hospital-specific baseline performance** Tier 2: 47% or above (90th percentile performance for IEHP network) * California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative. ** If minimum denominator requirements are not met, hospital is assigned a Tier 1 goal at the 50th percentile for the IEHP network. 3

Payment Schedule: IEHP will adhere to the following payment schedule for all Hospital P4P measures: 2019 HOSPITAL P4P PAYMENT SCHEDULE Measurement Payment Month Budget Q1 2019 July 2019 $7,000,000 Q2 2019 October 2019 $7,000,000 Semi Annual- June October 2019 $1,500,000 Q3 2019 January 2020 $7,000,000 Q4 2019 April 2020 $7,000,000 Semi Annual- December April 2020 $1,500,000 Reporting Timeline: MEASURE NAME DATA SOURCE MEASUREMENT PERIOD DATA FREEZE DATE Manifest MedEx Active Data Sharing- Required Data Elements Manifest MedEx Quarter 1: Jan - Mar Quarter 2: Apr - June Quarter 3: July- Sept Quarter 4: Oct- Dec Quarter 1: June 15, 2019 Quarter 2: Sept 15, 2019 Quarter 3: Dec 15, 2019 Quarter 4: Mar 15, 2020 Manifest MedEx Active Data Sharing- Optional Data Elements Manifest MedEx June 2019 Dec 2019 June: Sept 15, 2019 Dec: Mar 15, 2020 NTSV Cesarean Delivery Rate CMQCC Maternal Data Center Reporting POLST Registry Forms Submission PCR Observed-to- Expected Ratio Post Discharge Follow- Up within Seven Days for High-Risk Members POLST Registry & IEHP IEHP Claims & Encounters IEHP Claims & Encounters Quarter 1: Jan - Mar Quarter 2: Apr - June Quarter 3: July- Sept Quarter 4: Oct- Dec Quarter 1: June 15, 2019 Quarter 2: Sept 15, 2019 Quarter 3: Dec 15, 2019 Quarter 4: Mar 15, 2020 4

Payment Calculation: Payments to hospitals are based on IEHP Member admissions, and are calculated by the following formula: Step 1: Determine the Percent of Total Admissions per Hospital [Total IEHP Admissions for Hospital in the Quarter] [Total IEHP Admissions for All Eligible Hospitals in the Quarter] = Percent of Total Admissions Step 2: Determine the Amount of P4P Dollars Available per Hospital [Percent of Total Admissions] X [Total Quarterly P4P Dollars Available] = Total P4P Dollars Available per Hospital Per Quarter EXAMPLE: Hospital X Step 1: Determine the Percent of Total Admissions per Hospital IEHP Admissions for Hospital X for Quarter 1 2019 = 3,000 Total IEHP Admissions for All Hospitals for Quarter 1 2019 = 16,000 3,000 16,000 = 0.1875 Step 2: Determine the Amount of P4P Dollars Available per Hospital 0.1875 X $7,000,000 = $1,312,500 Available for Hospital X for All Measures per Quarter 5

SUMMARY OF MEASURES The following section describes each of the Hospital P4P Program measures. Measure Name: Manifest MedEx Active Data Sharing Required Data Elements Background: Manifest MedEx (MX) supports Health Information Exchange (HIE) connectivity across the state of California and currently includes 30 hospitals, medical groups, IPAs and Physician practices in the Inland Empire. Manifest MX works closely with a local partner, Inland Empire Health Information Organization (IEHIO), which represents 11 hospitals and most of the Physicians in the area who participate in organized Physician groups and IPAs (2,400 unduplicated Physicians). The remaining Physicians are largely in solo practices. Manifest MX also includes many other healthcare organizations, such as Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and multispecialty clinics. Performance Requirements: Hospitals must demonstrate active data sharing with Manifest MX by submitting all data types listed below throughout the entire measurement period (i.e., quarter). Completeness of hospital data will be assessed throughout the quarter to ensure data sharing was in place throughout the entire measurement period. It is expected that hospitals report all discharges and admissions (including emergency room, acute and subacute stays) to Manifest MX. REQUIRED MX DATA CONTRIBUTION FOR HOSPITALS: HL7 ADT data feed that complies with MX data-sharing guidelines in production Admissions Data Discharge Data Diagnosis Data HL7 ORU data feed that complies with MX data-sharing guidelines in production Lab Results HL7 RDE data feed that complies with MX data-sharing guidelines in production Prescribed Meds with Status & SIG Hospitals must have a current participation agreement (PA) in place with MX. The executed PA using MX s post-merger PA structure must be in place at the beginning of each quarter in order to qualify for the quarterly payment. 6

Definitions: Current Participation Agreement (PA) Participant has executed a PA with MX using MX s post-merger PA structure Acronym Dictionary: ADT: Admission, discharge, transfer message HL7: Health level 7 standards development organization ORU: Observation result message PA: Participation agreement RDE: Pharmacy/treatment encoded order message Measure Name: Manifest MedEx Active Data Sharing Optional Data Elements Background: Manifest MedEx (MX) supports Health Information Exchange (HIE) connectivity across the state of California and currently includes 30 hospitals, medical groups, IPAs and Physician practices in the Inland Empire. Manifest MX works closely with a local partner, Inland Empire Health Information Organization (IEHIO), which represents 11 hospitals and most of the Physicians in the area who participate in organized Physician groups and IPAs (2,400 unduplicated Physicians). The remaining Physicians are largely in solo practices. Manifest MX also includes many other healthcare organizations, such as Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and multispecialty clinics. Performance Requirements: IEHP wants to encourage a more robust set of hospital data available within the HIE to support patient coordination of care. This measure is designed to reward hospitals who share a broader set of data with Manifest MX beyond the Required data element set. Hospitals will have two opportunities to earn incentive dollars for this measure: - Hospitals that have the following optional data-sharing elements in production with Manifest MX by June 30, 2019 will receive a one-time payment for early measure adoption. - Hospitals that have the following optional data-sharing elements in production with Manifest MX no later than December 1, 2019 will be eligible for a one-time payment. - For maximum incentive earnings, hospitals must have the following optional data-sharing elements in production with Manifest MX by June 30, 2019, and continue actively sharing through December 1, 2019. 7

In order to be compliant with this measure, it is expected that hospitals report all discharges and admissions (including emergency room, acute and subacute stays) to Manifest MX for all message types noted in the table below. MX DATA CONTRIBUTION FOR HOSPITALS: HL7 ORU data feed that complies with MX data-sharing guidelines in production Lab Documents Pathology Documents Radiology Documents Chart Notes* HL7 VXU data feed that complies with MX data-sharing guidelines in production Immunization Data *Chart notes include: discharge summary, consults, progress notes, surgical notes and procedure notes Hospitals must have a current participation agreement (PA) in place with MX. The executed PA using MX s post-merger PA structure must be in place at the beginning of each quarter in order to qualify for the quarterly payment. Definitions: Current Participation Agreement (PA) Participant has executed a PA with MX using MX s post-merger PA structure Acronym Dictionary: HL7: Health level 7 standards development organization ORU: Observation result message PA: Participation agreement VXU: Immunization data 8

Measure Name: NTSV Cesarean Delivery Rate Background: California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) calculates a standardized measure that assesses the rate of Cesarean births, focusing on the all-important first birth. This measure is known as the Nulliparous Term Singleton Vertex (NTSV) Cesarean Birth Rate. It identifies the proportion of live babies born at or beyond 37 weeks of gestation to women in their first pregnancy, which are singleton (no twins or beyond) and which are in the vertex presentation (no breech or transverse positions), via Cesarean birth. The United States Department of Health and Human Services, in its Healthy People 2020 project, simplified the name for non-obstetric audiences as Low-Risk Cesarean Birth Among First-Time Pregnant Women. This is somewhat imprecise, as there are some higher-risk patients who remain in the denominator but have very little impact. The Joint Commission subsequently adopted this metric in 2010 and now requires all hospitals with more than 300 births to report their results as part of the Perinatal Core Measure Set. The metric has also been adopted by the Leapfrog Group and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Several states also require hospital reporting as part of their Medicaid quality initiatives. The NTSV Cesarean Birth measure was re-endorsed as one of the National Quality Forum s (NQF) Perinatal and Reproductive Health measures in 2016, and the Joint Commission is now the steward of the measure. Methodology: Hospitals with maternity service lines must actively participate in the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) Maternal Data Center Reporting and sign a CMQCC authorization release to share hospital-level results with IEHP by February 15, 2019 (if an authorization of release was not signed prior). Hospitals with no maternity service lines are not eligible to receive incentive dollars for this measure. All hospitals that participate in the IEHP Hospital P4P Program must report their rates according to the CMQCC reporting guidelines and timeframes, and must authorize CMQCC to give IEHP access to the reported rates. IEHP will receive hospital-specific rates from CMQCC according to the reporting timeline noted in the Payment Methodology Section. A lower rate in this measure indicates better performance. 9

Measure Name: Physicians Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Registry Forms Submission Background: A Physicians Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Registry is a repository that hosts digital POLST forms and makes them accessible via various digital platforms. Physicians can access the digital POLST forms on demand throughout the continuum of care without any administrative delay. Integrating the POLST Registry into a hospital s electronic health record (EHR) facilitates usage of the POLST form. The registry is available to hospitals, skilled nursing facilities and the Inland Empire Health Information Exchange (IEHIE), as well as mobile and web technologies. Access, at any given time, will ensure that a patient s end-of-life treatment wishes are honored. IEHP has engaged the California POLST Registry to connect a digital POLST form network throughout the Inland Empire, linking hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, the HIE and independent Physicians. Each participating hospital must enter into an agreement with the California POLST Registry to integrate the POLST Registry into its EHR. Please contact: California POLST Registry Email: support@capolstregistry.org Phone: (888) 621-4383 This measure is based on the percentage of POLST Forms submitted by a hospital out of total IEHP admissions for adult Members per quarter. Numerator: Number of POLST forms submitted per hospital each quarter. Denominator: Total number of IEHP adult admissions for the quarter per hospital. Measure Goal: POLST forms submitted for at least 10 percent of the total adult IEHP hospital admissions per quarter. 10

Measure Name: Plan All-Cause Readmissions (PCR) Observed-to-Expected Ratio For IEHP Members 18 years of age and older, the number of acute inpatient stays during the measurement period that are followed by an unplanned acute readmission for any diagnosis within 30 days and the predicted probability of an acute readmission. Description: The Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS ) measure called Plan All-Cause Readmissions (PCR) is utilized to determine the 30-day readmission rate for IEHP Hospitals. Data are reported in the following categories: 1) Count of Index Hospital Stays (IHS) (Denominator) 2) Count of Observed 30-Day Readmissions (Numerator) 3) Count of Expected 30-Day Readmissions 4) Observed-to-Expected Ratio The Observed-to-Expected Ratio (O/E Ratio) is the final measure used to determine hospital performance. Count of Index Hospital Stays (IHS): Count of all acute inpatient discharges on or between January 1 and December 1 of the measurement year (2019). Count of Observed 30-Day Readmissions: Count of all acute readmissions for any diagnosis within 30 days of the Index Discharge Date. Count of Expected 30-Day Readmissions: The count of expected readmissions is determined in 2 steps: 1) Calculate the Estimated Readmission Risk for each IHS by summing the following risk adjustment weights: Age/gender Surgeries Discharge clinical condition Comorbidities 2) Sum the Estimated Readmission Risk for all IHS in the reporting period 11

Observed 30-Day Readmissions Rate: The Count of Observed 30-Day Readmissions divided by the Count of Index Hospital Stays. Expected 30-Day Readmissions Rate: The Count of Expected 30-Day Readmissions divided by the Count of Index Hospital Stays. Observed-to-Expected Ratio: The Rate of Observed 30-Day Readmissions divided by the Rate of Expected 30-Day Readmissions. Exclusions: The following discharges are excluded from the measure: Principal diagnosis of pregnancy Principal diagnosis of a condition originating in the perinatal period Member died during the stay Nonacute inpatient stays Hospice care One-day stays Principal diagnosis of maintenance chemotherapy Principal diagnosis of rehabilitation Organ transplant Potentially planned procedures without a principal acute diagnosis To be eligible for this measure, Members must be enrolled with IEHP 365 days prior to the Index Discharge Date through 30 days after the Index Discharge Date. No more than one gap in enrollment of up to 45 days during the 365 days prior to the Index Discharge Date. No gap is allowed during the 30 days following the Index Discharge Date. Minimum Hospital Denominator Requirement: Count of Index Hospital Stays must be 20 or greater for this measure to be eligible for payment. 12

Measure Name: Post-Discharge Follow-Up Within Seven Days of Discharge for High-Risk Members For High-Risk Medi-Cal Members, 18 years of age and older, the number of discharges during the measurement period that are followed by an outpatient visit within seven days. To identify high-risk Members, IEHP employs the Johns Hopkins ACG System, which uses data from the prior 12 months to generate predictive risk scores for the next 12 months. The ACG System measures the morbidity burden of patient populations based on disease patterns, age and gender. A key strength of the ACG System is its ability to capture the interrelationships between co-occurring morbidities, which are the hallmark of the chronically ill populations that pose the greatest demands for health care resources. The clinical and statistical algorithms by which billions of potential disease combinations are distilled down to a fixed number of health status categories is the essence of the ACG System. IEHP uses the ACG System to harness the power of the ambulatory and inpatient diagnostic information as well as pharmaceutical information to risk-stratify the entire IEHP membership. For the purpose of high-risk Member stratification, IEHP uses the ACG predictive marker called, Probability of High Total Cost. This marker predicts the probability of a Member being in the top 5 percent of the total high cost for IEHP in the next 12 months. Because of the robust algorithms used by the ACG System, individuals with short acute episodic utilization of the health care system are not part of the top 5 percent of the total high-cost population. The top 5 percent of the total high-cost population includes individuals with multiple chronic conditions and comorbidities who often require extensive utilization of the health care system. They demonstrate the need for timely post-discharge follow-up with a Primary Care Provider. For the purposes of this measure, IEHP considers high-risk Members to be those who have a probability score of 0.5 for being in the top 5 percent of the total cost. Denominator: All acute and nonacute inpatient discharges during the measurement period for high-risk Members. IEHP utilizes the HEDIS measure denominator specifications for Medication Reconciliation Post Discharge (MRP) to determine the initial denominator. Once these Members and discharges have been identified, the denominator is further refined to only include those Members who meet the high-risk criteria of a Probability of High Total Cost value of 0.5 on the date of discharge. To be eligible for this measure, IEHP Members must be enrolled with IEHP on the date of discharge through 30 days after discharge (31 total days). 13

Note: If the discharge is followed by a readmission or direct transfer to an acute or nonacute inpatient care setting on the date of discharge through 30 days after discharge (31 total days), only the last discharge is counted. Minimum Denominator Requirement: Denominator must be 10 or above for this measure. Numerator: High-risk Members who had a follow-up visit with a practitioner within seven days of discharge. 14

To view an IEHP Member s current Probability of High Total Cost Risk Score, hospitals can log in to the IEHP Secure Provider Portal and follow these steps: 1 From the Home Screen, click on Eligibility 2 Enter the Member ID and Click Search 3 Click on the Chart icon 4 View Member Risk Score: Probability of High Total Cost 15

NOTES 16

Provider Relations Team (909) 890-2054 Monday-Friday, 8am - 5pm Follow us: 2019 Inland Empire Health Plan. All Rights Reserved. PS-19-1110177