TBI INPATIENT REHABILITATION LENGTH OF STAY (LOS) REFERENCE TABLE

Similar documents
All rights reserved. For permission or information, please contact CIHI:

Julie Bantle, MA, OT/L, Chief Operating Officer Deirdre Huneke, PT, Therapy Supervisor/FIM Coordinator

2018 UDSmr Webinar Series

Hardwiring Processes to Improve Patient Outcomes

INPATIENT REHABILITATION UNIT Outcomes Report

FIM and the UDSMR logo are trademarks of Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, a division of UB Foundation Activities, Inc.

Case Mix - Putting HIMs in the Mix. HealthAchieve November 3, 2014 Greg Zinck Manager, Case Mix Canadian Institute for Health Information

HEALTHSOUTH CORPORATION

Acute Care to Rehab & Complex Continuing Care (CCC) Referral

Slide 1. Slide 2 LEADERSHIP & ACCOUNTABILITY... THE IMPACT OF ACCURATE FIM SCORES RAISING THE BAR

Exploring the Hip Fracture and Joint Replacement Landscape in a Changing Context: Implications and Recommendations GTA REHAB NETWORK

Revisiting the inpatient rehabilitation case-mix and funding model in Ontario, Canada: lessons learned

Tracking Functional Outcomes throughout the Continuum of Acute and Postacute Rehabilitative Care

Leveraging Your Facility s 5 Star Analysis to Improve Quality

The disability status of injured patients measured by the functional independence measure (FIM) and their use of rehabilitation services

EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation

Health System Performance and Accountability Division MOHLTC. Transitional Care Program Framework

How to Calculate CIHI s Cost of a Standard Hospital Stay Indicator

A Historical Look at the UDSMR Program Evaluation Model

Affirming the Value of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 for Nursing Home Decision-Making and Quality Improvement

(M1025) Case-Mix Diagnosis (Optional) OPTIONAL Complete only if a Z-code in Column 2 is reported in place of a resolved condition

Final Report on Assessment Instruments for a Prospective Payment System

Creating a Virtual Continuing Care Hospital (CCH) to Improve Functional Outcomes and Reduce Readmissions and Burden of Care. Opportunity Statement

Objectives 9/18/2018. Patient Driven Payment Model(PDPM) Janine Finck Boyle, MBA/HCA, LNHA Vice President of Regulatory Affairs Fall 2018

Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System for FY 2019 [CMS-1688-P] Summary of Proposed Rule

Canadian - Health Outcomes for Better Information and Care (C-HOBIC)

OASIS-C Home Health Outcome Measures

SNF proposed rule revisions to case-mix methodology

Submitting Inpatient Rehabilitation Requests for Authorization

SECTION 3: THE FIM INSTRUMENT

Methodology Notes. Cost of a Standard Hospital Stay: Appendices to Indicator Library

Facility-Based Continuing Care in Canada, An Emerging Portrait of the Continuum

Executive Summary. This Project

Attachment C: Itemized List of OASIS Data Elements

2/20/2018. Resident Classification System RCS-1. CMS Proposal

ALLOWED VS. AUTHORIZED HOURS CASE MANAGEMENT IN-SERVICE POWER HOUR JULY 14, 2016 MEDICAID APD LTC SYSTEMS

THE NATIONAL SPINAL CORD INJURY DATABASE PERSONAL DATA

Regulatory Compliance Risks. September 2009

New Quality Measures Will Soon Impact Nursing Home Compare and the 5-Star Rating System: What providers need to know

National Rehabilitation Reporting System (NRS) Training Manual

NORTH DAKOTA LEVEL OF CARE FORM INSTRUCTIONS TO BE USED WITH LOC FORM ND

Long-Term Care Homes Financial Policy

Medicare Part A SNF Payment System Reform: Introduction to Resident Classification System - I

RESIDENT SCREENING SHEET

Developmental /Category III Explanatory/Category II Not Defined Explanatory/Category II Defined Proposed Priority

STROKE REHAB PROGRAM

Goodbye PPS: Hello RCS!

Ontario Mental Health Reporting System

Work In Progress August 24, 2015

Prior Authorization form for Post-Acute Care Admission and Recertification for SNF,LTAC and Rehab

Quality Measures and the Five-Star Rating

DoDNA WOUNDED, ILL, AND INJURED SENIOR OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301

6/12/2017. The Rumor is True: A New PPS Payment System is on the Horizon Presented by: RKL, LLP Senior Living Services Consulting Group

Developing ABF in mental health services: time is running out!

Table of Contents. Foundation: Understand the Basics 4. Tools: Put the Pieces Together 21. Solve: Learn by Example 38. Printable Tools 56

Health Quality Ontario

a guide to Oregon Adult Foster Homes for potential residents, family members and friends

APD & MHA RESIDENT SCREENING SHEET

Key points. Home Care agency structures. Introduction to Physical Therapy in the Home Care Setting. Home care industry

POSITION SUMMARY. 2. Communicates: Reads, writes and speaks in English as required for taking direction and performing job-related activities.

SW LHIN Complex Continuing Care Eligibility Guidelines

The Shift is ON! Goodbye PPS, Hello RCS

Dazed and Confused: Initial Results from the IRF QRP Data

An Overview of Ohio s In-Home Service Program For Older People (PASSPORT)

OASIS-B1 and OASIS-C Items Unchanged, Items Modified, Items Dropped, and New Items Added.

CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR UM DECISIONS Skilled Nursing Facilities

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Updated September 2007

FY17 LONG TERM CARE RISK ADJUSTMENT

Kentucky Medicaid Nurse Aide. Curriculum Guidelines

MRN as recorded in HIE (Synaptix) Synaptix episode ID. Synaptix episode end date. Synaptix episode start date. Synaptix phase end date

Understanding the PEPPER

Personal Care Assistant (PCA) Nursing Assessment Tool

Spinal Cord Injury T10-L2

The Royal Hospital Donnybrook Referral Form

Residential aged care funding reform

PHYSICIAN S REPORT FOR ASSISTED LIVING HOME FOR RESIDENT / CLIENT OF, OR APPLICANT FOR ADMISSION TO, HOME CARE FACILITIES

Uniform Data System. The Functional Assessment Specialists. June 21, 2011

The Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Quality Reporting Program. Overview. Legislative Mandate. Anne Deutsch, RN, PhD, CRRN

Long Term Care (LTC) Facility Authorization Request

NJ Level of Care and Assessment Process

PHYSICIAN S REPORT FOR ASSISTED LIVING HOME FOR RESIDENT / CLIENT OF, OR APPLICANT FOR ADMISSION TO, HOME CARE FACILITIES

Reference costs 2016/17: highlights, analysis and introduction to the data

Hospital Mental Health Database, User Documentation

Indicator description

HOSPITAL SERVICE ACCOUNTABILITY AGREEMENT: Indicator Technical Specifications

Canada s Health Care System and Frailty

Name Telephone. Address. Physician Birthdate Marital Status. Current Medical Conditions. Name Telephone. Address. Address

Rhode Island Hospital Inpatient Rehab Unit (IRU)

1st Annual CRRN Review Course October 2-3, 2014

A.W. Cluff and R J. Cluff

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

AGING & PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES 4 ADL CA/PS ASSESSMENT POST 10/1/17

Objectives 2/23/2011. Crossing Paths Intersection of Risk Adjustment and Coding

Provider Payment: highlights from the evidence

ADULT LONG-TERM CARE SERVICES

Health informatics implications of Sub-acute transition to activity based funding

Overview of TEFT Project

Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) An Overview

Inpatient Rehabilitation Program Information

Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Narrative for Health Care Organizations in Ontario

Transcription:

TBI INPATIENT REHABILITATION LENGTH OF STAY () REFERENCE TABLE ONTARIO DATA 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 Resource Intensity RPG N N N Least 1230, 1240, 1250 459 32.4 455 30.3 483 29.6 Moderate 1220 113 46.8 166 41.7 171 40.3 Most 1200, 1210 147 61.8 203 57.3 212 58.3 RG N Total N total N total Total 12 719 40.7 824 39.2 866 38.8 Source: National Rehabilitation Reporting System (NRS), Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), 2015-2016 Legend: RG: Rehabilitation Group (RG) is a grouping methodology used to assign adults clients admitted in rehabilitation according to the main reason for receiving inpatient rehabilitation services. RG 12 corresponds to the Traumatic Brain Injury group. RPG: Rehabilitation Patient Group (RPG) is a grouping methodology used to categorize data submitted to the CIHI NRS database. Based on a client s RG classification, and using the client s admission age and admission motor and cognitive FIM status scores, TBI patients are assigned to one of five (5) TBI RPGs (1200, 1210, 1220, 1230, 1240 and 1250). Details on the methodology used to classify patients in specific TBI RPG are provided below. N: Number of adults admitted in a rehabilitation facility in Ontario with, as primary reason for receiving services, a diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI RG 12). There are 17 rehabilitation facilities providing inpatient services to adults having sustained a TBI in the province of Ontario. : The average length of stay () represents the average number of days people remain admitted in a TBI inpatient rehabilitation facilities per RPG group or for the entire RG 12 group. 1

Ontario RPG grouping methodology The RPG grouping methodology uses Rehabilitation Client Groups to reflect the health condition that best describes the primary reason for admission to inpatient rehabilitation. As can be seen in Figure 1, FIM scores are used to group patients into one of the RPGs associated with Traumatic Brain Injury (1200, 1210, 1220, 1230, 1240 and 1250). These categories were developed by looking at the outcome variable (length of stay) for a large group of Ontario patients and working backwards to describe the subdivisions of data that were seen. Ultimately, the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care s (MOHLTC) ended up describing these subdivisions using a combination of Rehabilitation Client Group (RCG), motor function score (FIM instrument), cognitive function score (FIM instrument), and age (and sometimes only a subset of these). It decided against using other variables, like comorbidities, service interruptions, etc., but noted a desire to re-visit that decision in the future. The Function Scores referenced in Figure 1 are based on data collected using the FIM instrument. The 18-item FIM instrument is the property of Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, a division of UB Foundation Activities, Inc. See Figure 2 for more detail on the composition of the FIM instrument. The RPG Admission Motor Function Score is calculated by adding the score from 12 data elements (collected at admission). (As per the RPG methodology, Motor Function Score does not include the Tub Transfer Score in the calculation.) The Admission Motor Function Score is the simple sum of the values of these elements: 41. Eating 42. Grooming 43. Bathing 44. Dressing Upper Body 45. Dressing Lower Body 46. Toileting 47. Bladder Management 48. Bowel Management 49. Transfer: Bed, Chair, Wheelchair 50. Transfer: Toilet 52. Locomotion: Walk/Wheelchair 53. Locomotion: Stairs Each data element should have a score of 1 to 7. The Admission Motor Function Score range is 12 to 84. The RPG Admission Cognitive Function Score is calculated by adding the score from five data elements (collected at admission). The Admission Cognitive Function Score is the simple sum of the values of these elements: 54. Comprehension 55. Expression 56. Social Interaction 57. Problem-Solving 58. Memory 2

Each data element should have a score of 1 to 7. The Admission Cognitive Function Score range is 5 to 35. Note: RPGs are adapted with permission from the UDSMR impairment codes - Copyright 1997 Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, a division of UB Foundation Activities, Inc., all rights reserved. For additional information about RPG grouping methodology and weights please visit CIHI's Case Mix webpage at: https://www.cihi.ca/en/dataand-standards/standards/case-mix. For additional information about the National Rehabilitation Reporting System s history, composition and major limitations, please consult the Data Quality Documentation available on the CIHI website at: https://www.cihi.ca/en/types-of-care/hospital-care/rehabilitation/national-rehabilitation-reporting-system-nrsmetadata. 3

Figure 1: Flowchart showing how the RPG is allocated 4

Source: Figure prepared by the Canadian Institute for Health Information. 5

Figure 2: Overview of the FIM instrument Source: Figure prepared by the Canadian Institute for Health Information. 6