A Misallocation of Resources: Assigning Second Lieutenant. 0203s to the Logistics Combat Element (LCE) Captain G.S. McSween. Major A.B.

Similar documents
Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? Submitted by Capt Mark C. Brown CG #15. Majors Dixon and Duryea EWS 2005

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

MAKING IT HAPPEN: TRAINING MECHANIZED INFANTRY COMPANIES

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

Improving the Tank Scout. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain R.L. Burton CG #3, FACADs: Majors A.L. Shaw and W.C. Stophel 7 February 2006

The Affect of Division-Level Consolidated Administration on Battalion Adjutant Sections

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

Redefining how Relative Values are determined on Fitness Reports EWS Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain S.R. Walsh to Maj Tatum 19 Feb 08

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Rethinking Tactical HUMINT in a MAGTF World EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Capt M.S. Wilbur To Major Dixon, CG 8 6 January 2006

Submitted by Captain RP Lynch To Major SD Griffin, CG February 2006

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Sustaining the Marine Corps Martial Arts Program. EWS Contemporary Issues Paper. Submitted by Captain G.S. Rooker. Major Gelerter / Major Uecker, CG#3

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

IMPROVING SPACE TRAINING

No Time for Boats EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain P. B. Byrne to Major A. L. Shaw and Major W. C. Stophel, CG 3 7 February 2006

In 2007, the United States Army Reserve completed its

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

The Need for NMCI. N Bukovac CG February 2009

Where Have You Gone MTO? Captain Brian M. Bell CG #7 LTC D. Major

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Joint Terminal Attack Controller, A Primary MOS For The Future. EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain M.J. Carroll to Major P.M.

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

The Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test: The Need to Replace it with a Combat Fitness Test EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain E. M.

Blue on Blue: Tracking Blue Forces Across the MAGTF Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain D.R. Stengrim to: Major Shaw, CG February 2005

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Improving ROTC Accessions for Military Intelligence

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

CAAT in Deliberate Urban Attacks

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

The Shake and Bake Noncommissioned Officer. By the early-1960's, the United States Army was again engaged in conflict, now in

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Shallow-Water Mine Countermeasure Capability for USMC Ground Reconnaissance Assets EWS Subject Area Warfighting

New Tactics for a New Enemy By John C. Decker

Closing the Barn Doors After the Cows Have Left: MCRC s Solution to the Recruiter Shortfall EWS Subject Area Manpower

Report Documentation Page

Adapting the Fitness Report: Evolving an intangible quality into a tangible evaluation to

The Need for a New Battery Option. Subject Area General EWS 2006

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Marine Corps Mentoring Program. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. D. Watson to CG #10 FACAD: Major P. J. Nugent 07 February 2006

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

USMC Identity Operations Strategy. Major Frank Sanchez, USMC HQ PP&O

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Non-Traditional Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance: A Challenge to USMC Fixed Wing Tactical Aircraft

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Wildland Fire Assistance

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

The Need For A Reconnaissance Officer MOS. Captain BJ Hodgins

Military Police: The Force of Choice. EWS Contemporary Issues Paper. Submitted by Captain Erinn C. Singman. Major R.F. Revoir, CG 9.

USMC Expeditionary Energy

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Marine Officer Promotions: Incentivizing and Retaining Top Performers. Captain Michael J. Lorino

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

2010 Fall/Winter 2011 Edition A army Space Journal

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

Air Education and Training Command

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Potential Savings from Substituting Civilians for Military Personnel (Presentation)

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Intelligence, Information Operations, and Information Assurance

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

Maintaining Tank and Infantry Integration Training EWS Subject Area Training

Medical Requirements and Deployments

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Grow the U.S. Army, Again EWS Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain Travis Trammell to Major Charles Lynn, CG February 2008

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

VSE Corporation. Integrity - Agility - Value. VSE Corporation Proprietary Information

Transcription:

A Misallocation of Resources: Assigning Second Lieutenant 0203s to the Logistics Combat Element (LCE) Captain G.S. McSween Major A.B. Irvin, CG 7 20 Feb 2009

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 20 FEB 2009 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2009 to 00-00-2009 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE A Misallocation of Resources: Assigning Second Lieutenant 0203s to the Logistics Combat Element (LCE) 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) United States Marine Corps,Command and Staff College, Marine Corps University,2076 South Street, Marine Corps Combat Development Command,Quantico,VA,22134-5068 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 12 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

1 Introduction Most ground intelligence [military occupational specialty (MOS) 0203] second lieutenants report to the ground combat element (GCE) for their first tour once they reach the operating forces. However, a number of them report to the logistics combat element (LCE) for their first tour in the operating forces. This is a misallocation of resources. Instead of being assigned to the LCE, second lieutenant 0203s should be initially assigned only to the GCE to follow the original intent of the Van Riper Plan, to make the best use of their infantry-centric skills, and to provide 0203s with invaluable platoon commander experience. Background: LOGINT? The term logistics intelligence, or LOGINT, does not appear in the U.S. Marine Corps or any other branch of the U.S. military s publications when referring to the specific type of intelligence that supports logistics operations. As a result, Marine Corps MOS schools instruct neither intelligence officers nor enlisted analysts on how intelligence supports logistics operations. To define, standardize, and incorporate this term into the Marine Corps and military s vernacular and establishment would help put this potential INT into perspective relative to

2 the more established INTs to which the intelligence community has become accustomed. The lack of a specific plan to deal with the Marine Corps support to logistics intelligence is at the root of why a number of 0203 second lieutenants are shortsightedly assigned to the LCE upon finishing their MOS schools. The Van Riper Plan The Van Riper Plan refers to the intelligence plan of 1994 set in motion by then-major General P.K. Van Riper, USMC (now Lieutenant General P.K. Van Riper, USMC, Retired). It was implemented as a result of problems associated with Marine Corps intelligence in Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. One of the six specific problems that Major General Van Riper intended to address with this plan was a perceived lack of professional intelligence officer career development and structure. 1 With this specific problem in mind, the Marine Corps overhauled its entire intelligence structure. For officers, the result was a system that involved training second lieutenants in one of four intelligence specialties. These four included ground intelligence (0203), human intelligence (0204), signals intelligence (0206), and air intelligence (0207). These MOSs were granted at TBS to second lieutenants. After their first operating forces

3 tour, officers would attend the Marine air-ground task force (MAGTF) Intelligence Officer Course (MIOC) to become MAGTF intelligence officers (MOS 0202). The desired endstate was to have officers start as lieutenants with a specialized MOS, then become a more generalized intelligence officer as a senior first lieutenant or captain upon completion of MIOC. This would enable the versatile 0202 to serve in a variety of intelligence billets. Assigning 0203s to the LCE detracts from General Van Riper s intent since it takes these officers off of an already difficult-to-follow career path, and hinders their development. Infantry-Centric Training After TBS, the requirements for the designation of the 0203 MOS are the successful completion of the Infantry Officer Course (IOC), the Scout Sniper Employment Course (SSEC), and the Ground Intelligence Officer Course (GIOC). To finish these courses requires seven months. If 0203s do not put their infantry-centric training to use in the operating forces, their skills will atrophy. The Marine Corps has spent and continues to spend a considerable amount of time and money on making ground intelligence officers capable of commanding rifle, weapons, sniper, or

4 reconnaissance platoons or to serve as assistant intelligence officers upon reporting into the operating forces- presumably into the GCE. To place second lieutenant 0203s into LCE billets, which have nothing to do with anything they have been taught throughout their MOS training, is to waste the time and money that the Marine Corps has invested in these officers. Platoon Commander Experience Per their MOS training, ground intelligence officers new 0203 second lieutenants should be assigned only to the GCE following their MOS training. This will afford them platoon commander time and experience, and most importantly, MOS credibility. Of course, the number of ground intelligence officers seeking platoon command far exceeds the number of platoons that are available in the Marine Corps. Captains M.W. Peters and B.L. Gilman are correct in their assertion that Unfortunately, there are now many more 0203 second lieutenants than there are scout-sniper or reconnaissance platoons. 2 This is especially true when infantry officers are considered in the overall numbers. To expect a 0203 second lieutenant to serve as a platoon commander for the duration of his first three-year tour in the operating

5 forces is unfeasible and unrealistic. However, he should expect and be given the opportunity to lead a platoon for a period of time that allows him to gain invaluable platoon leadership experience and credibility while still a lieutenant. If ground intelligence officers report directly to the LCE from MOS training, they will have significantly fewer, if any, opportunities for platoon leadership. This will cause some to lose ground relative to their 0203 peers who are assigned directly to the GCE from MOS training. The INT Disconnect Ground intelligence officers appear to be the best suited of the four entry level INTs to fill LCE billet requirements, due only to the process of elimination. Upon finishing MOS training, 0204s report to CI/HUMINT Company within intelligence battalions; 0206s report to radio battalions, and 0207s report to the air combat element (ACE). Unfortunately, this leaves ground intelligence officers to fill second lieutenant billets in the LCE. A disconnect exists between the type of GCE-focused training that 0203s receive, and the type of tasks they will be required to perform once assigned to the LCE. The GCE s mission is to locate, close with and destroy the enemy. As such, 0203 training focuses on leading and

6 employing Marines in combat, and gathering information about the enemy. The LCE, on the other hand, is most concerned with the throughput of logistics. Associated LCE intelligence tasks include conducting route studies and trafficability analysis. Training for one task, then being expected to perform another is illogical. Conversely, should a Marine be trained in logistics intelligence then be placed in a unit whose mission required him to employ snipers, gather information on the enemy, and lead Marines in combat, problems would arise. Competency and Experience Typically, ground intelligence second lieutenants in the LCE are combat logistics battalion (CLB) or combat logistics regiment (CLR) intelligence officers, and most are the junior ranking staff member in their respective primary staffs. In a CLB, new 0203s are sometimes peers with fellow staff officers as lieutenants but are rarely peers with company commanders in the battalion. For credibility purposes, it goes a long way for the intelligence officer to either have platoon commander experience or to at least be a captain and thus a peer with the company commanders in a CLB or CLR. With regard to experience, Captain Hood asserted that The Marine on point should be in a unit with an

7 experienced intelligence officer. This is not always the case. 3 In the LCE, having a second lieutenant as a battalion S-2 is a disservice to CLB or CLR commanders and their staffs. They deserve a more experienced and MAGTFlevel thinking primary staff intelligence officer, particularly with regard to today s highly complex current operating environment (COE). Career Progression Career progression is also a problem for officers who report directly to the LCE from MOS training. Their lack of specialization in a traditional INT in conjunction with their lack of platoon commander experience limits their options following their first tour in the operating forces. This puts LCE ground intelligence lieutenants at a significant disadvantage relative to their peers in the intelligence field. Current 0203 LCE Billet Manning The First, and Second, and Third Marine Logistics Groups (MLGs) all rate three 0203 second lieutenants on their tables of organization. 4 These nine total 0203 second lieutenant billets should be changed to reflect 0202 first lieutenants/captains or 0203 first lieutenants/captains- who will soon attend MIOC. Only post-platoon command ground

8 intelligence officers or MAGTF intelligence officers should be assigned to the LCE. The Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) has placed a significant emphasis on military intelligence throughout all branches of the Department of Defense. This means that more Marine Corps lieutenants are becoming intelligence officers. With a larger base of intelligence officers coming into the field, the Marine Corps will soon have more 0202s who can fill the required LCE billets, thus freeing 0203 second lieutenants for service in the GCE. Manpower Issues From a manpower perspective, maintaining the status quo is preferable because it is easy to cut three year orders for a new 0203 to the MLG. Sending a 0203 to division, tracking his progression, then assigning him to the MLG is preferable to the status quo, but this would be especially difficult with respect to individuals timing, unit deployment cycles, and the officers choices and preferences. Assigning 0203 second lieutenants to the GCE and would be in the best interests of the Marine Corps. Counterargument Affecting change in an bureaucratically heavy institution like the Marine Corps is difficult and takes time. Reasons for change need to be identified and

9 validated. The current outlook on the use of 0203 second lieutenants in the LCE is seemingly that the current system is working and does not need to be changed or modified. CLB and CLR commanders appreciate the versatility and training of their 0203s. For the aforementioned reasons, and for the long term health of Marine Corps intelligence, the current system needs to be changed. Conclusion The Marine Corps is doing itself a significant disservice by assigning second lieutenant 0203s directly to the LCE from their MOS training. Their GCE-focused infantry and intelligence training makes them better suited to initially serve in the GCE than in the LCE. The current approach to determining intelligence officer manning in the LCE needs to be readdressed. Only post-platoon command ground intelligence officers or MAGTF intelligence officers should be assigned to the LCE. By having platoon command in the GCE and then staff officer experience in the LCE, 0203s will be better rounded and better balanced officers. Word Count: 1700 1 Capt John K. Hood, Surviving First Contact?, Marine Corps Gazette, October 2008, 54-57.

10 2 Capt Brian L. Gilman and Capt Mark W. Peters, Refocusing the Effort: Another Perspective on 0203 Training, Marine Corps Gazette, March 1999, 47-48. 3 Capt John K. Hood, 54-57. 4 Phone interview with the 2d MLG G-2, Major B. Vinfrido, 17 Dec 2008.

11 Bibliography Michael E. Ennis, The Future of Intelligence, Marine Corps Gazette, October 1999. Brian Gilman and Mark W. Peters, Refocusing the Effort: Another Perspective on 0203 Training, Marine Corps Gazette, March 1999. John K. Hood, Surviving First Contact? Marine Corps Gazette, October 2008, pp. 54-57. David H. Ingram, Fixing Intelligence: It s Decision Time, Marine Corps Gazette, June 1992. Paul K. Van Riper, Observations During Operation DESERT STORM, Marine Corps Gazette, June 1991. Phone interview with the 2d MLG G-2, Major B. Vinfrido, 17 Dec 2008. U.S. Marine Corps, MCDP 2: Intelligence, 1997 (Washington, DC.: GPO, 1997). U.S. Marine Corps, MCRP 5-12D: Organization of Marine Corps Forces, XXXX (Washington, DC.: GPO, XXXX). U.S. Marine Corps, MCWP 2-1: Intelligence Operations (Washington, XXXX DC.: GPO, XXXX). U.S. Marine Corps, FM 34-130: Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield, XXXX(Washington, DC.: GPO, XXXX).