Military Health System Conference The Army Comprehensive Behavioral Health System of Care (CBHSOC) Campaign Plan

Similar documents
National Guard and Army Reserve Readiness and Operations Support

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Military Health System Conference. Behavioral Health Clinical Quality in the MHS : Past Present and Future

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Military Health System Conference. Virtual Behavioral Health Program at TAMC

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

TRICARE: A Regional View

Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

Military Health System Conference. Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Karen S. Guice, MD, MPP Executive Director Federal Recovery Coordination Program MHS, January 2011

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

Wildland Fire Assistance

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Current & Future Prospective Payment System

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

TITLE: Spouses/Family Members of Service Members at Risk for PTSD or Suicide. Fairfax, VA 22030

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

ý Award Number: MIPR 3GD3DT3083 Total Eye Examination Automated Module (TEAM) PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Colonel Francis L.

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

USMC Identity Operations Strategy. Major Frank Sanchez, USMC HQ PP&O

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

at the Missile Defense Agency

Value and Innovation in Acquisition and Contracting

Army Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Veterans Affairs: Gray Area Retirees Issues and Related Legislation

TITLE: Development and Validation of a Theory Based Screening Process for Suicide Risk

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

The U.S. military has successfully completed hundreds of Relief-in-Place and Transfers of

Re-Engineering Healthcare Integration Programs (REHIP)

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

DoD Architecture Registry System (DARS) EA Conference 2012

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Capability Planning for Today and Tomorrow Installation Status Report

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

The Need for NMCI. N Bukovac CG February 2009

Report Documentation Page

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act: Background and Issues

Report No. D July 25, Guam Medical Plans Do Not Ensure Active Duty Family Members Will Have Adequate Access To Dental Care

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

Cold Environment Assessment Tool (CEAT) User s Guide

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class (CVN-21) Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

On 10 July 2008, the Training and Readiness Authority

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

SPECIAL REPORT Unsurfaced Road Maintenance Management. Robert A. Eaton and Ronald E. Beaucham December 1992

AMCOM Corrosion Program

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Potential Savings from Substituting Civilians for Military Personnel (Presentation)

U.S. Army Reserve Base Realignment & Closure (BRAC) Sustainable Design & Construction in Action

A system overview of the Electronic Surveillance System for the Early Notification of Community-based Epidemics

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

Transcription:

2010 2011 Military Health System Conference The Army Comprehensive Behavioral Health System of Care (CBHSOC) Campaign Plan Standardize to Optimize Sharing The Quadruple Knowledge: Aim: Working Achieving Together, Breakthrough Achieving Performance Success COL Rebecca Porter, Ph.D., Chief, Behavioral Health Division 24-JAN-2011 US Army Medical Department, Office of the Surgeon General

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 24 JAN 2011 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2011 to 00-00-2011 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE The Army Comprehensive Behavioral Health System of Care (CBHSOC) Campaign Plan: Standardize to Optimize 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Army Medical Command,Office of the Surgeon General,Fort Sam Houston,TX,78234 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES presented at the 2011 Military Health System Conference, January 24-27, National Harbor, Maryland 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 17 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Introduction Ongoing conflicts resulted in elevated negative behavioral health outcomes, including deaths by suicide. Demand significantly increased for Army Behavioral Health Services.

Increased Demand for Army Behavioral Health Two Key Findings from the Health Promotion / Risk Reduction / Suicide Prevention Report, 2010 While the civilian suicide rate has remained relatively stable through 2007 (with 2008 and 2009 unknown), the Army rate has increased steadily through FY 2009. (p.16) The greatest increase in military suicides have occurred in the Army and Marine Corps which have borne the greatest burden of ground combat in a protracted war. (p. 16.)

Army Population at Risk NOTE: Numbers are not mutually exclusive. Soldiers may appear in more than one ring. Army Population at Risk Direct Entry Baseline Population ARPERGEN Stress Career Family Anxiety Meds Alcohol Related Suicides 160 Maze Entry FY 2009 Data Death High Risk Behavior Help seeking Behavior Baseline Population High Risk Deaths 146 Suicide Attempts 1,713 Drug / Alcohol Offenses 16,997 Other Criminal Offenses 57,503 Inpatient BH Care 9,201 Prescription Drugs 106,413 Outpatient BH Care 216,222 Baseline Population ARFORGEN Stress Unit Deployment

Army Behavioral Health Systems Change Psychological Health (PH) Spend Plan (2007) Supplemental funding to improve Behavioral Health Care under the categories of access to care, resiliency, quality of care, and surveillance

Increased Utilization of the Army Behavioral Health System Behavioral Health Encounters for FY05-FY10 Encounters 1900000 1700000 1500000 1300000 1100000 900000 Congressional Supplemental Funding 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 FY Patient contacts (encounters) have approximately doubled since FY 2005, with the most significant one year gain in FY 2007.

Army Behavioral Health Systems Change Comprehensive Behavioral Health System of Care Campaign Plan (CBHSOC-CP) (2010) A system redesign focused on promoting quality and best practice through standardization and synchronization

Vision CBHSOC-CP Standardize to Optimize A nationally-commended, comprehensive, and integrated behavioral health system that fosters optimal physical, emotional and spiritual wellness Mission Deliver coordinated care to meet the physical, emotional and spiritual needs of our Soldiers and Families through effective education, prevention, diagnosis, intervention, treatment, documentation and follow-up

Overview of CBHSOC-CP Goals Relative to the Quadruple Aim Readiness Increased Resiliency Optimal operational mission capability Population Health Reduced Symptoms, Stress and Lost Work Days Improved Functioning Experience of Care Better Access, Continuity of Care and Satisfaction Per Capita Cost Reduced overall severity and disability

Assumptions of CBHSOC-CP By doctrine and best practice quality BH care is delivered: Proactively/Preventively Far forward - closest to the recipient Requires standardization of: BH data (clinical and non-clinical) Clinical processes and instruments Outcome metrics-evaluation methods Data Driven Care

CBHSOC-CP Work Groups: Framework and Priorities Work Groups (WGs) identify needs, ways and means to operationalize and institutionalize CBHSOC-CP tasks 14 WGs total (including critical and supportive) All parts of the CBHSOC-CP effort require: Development of standardized screening instruments across Army Force Generation Standardization of enterprise-wide BH data system Tele-BH system support (scheduling & connectivity across Regional Medical Commands)

CBHSOC-CP Work Groups: Framework and Priorities cont d Continuous program evaluation using standardized metrics to: Chart progress in 3 major domains outcomes/compliance/resourcing Identify & implement evidence-based best practices Identify & eliminate redundancy Inform MEDCOM leadership of clinical programs meriting proliferation consideration enterprise-wide Reserve Component s full program integration Synchronization with parallel efforts STRATCOM

Conclusion Increased resourcing (PH Spend Plan) and the CBHSOC-CP are the Army s response to the increased demand for, and the long term sustainment of, behavioral health services. Key to success will be to standardize existing systems around validated initiatives utilizing outcomes as the basis of sustainment. Current system enhancements are envisioned to be an enduring requirement that will exceed current operations.

Status of CBHSOC-CP to Date Back Up

Status of CBHSOC-CP to Date HQDA EXORD published (EXORD 277-10) Mandates screening points and use of Down Range Assessment Tool Directs Army-wide support to MEDCOM implementation MEDCOM CBHSOC Campaign Plan OPORD published (OPORD 10-70) FRAGO 1 provides coordination requirements for transfer of BH care during PCS Additional FRAGOs to be published as required going forward

Status of CBHSOC-CP to Date cont d Standardized deliverables constantly updated, tracked & stored on SharePoint website BH data system (ABHC prototype) received DBT certification 9 DEC 2010 MEDCOM CBHSOC Campaign Plan Governance Key stakeholder collaboration in campaign development and execution: VCSA, G1, G6, CSF, OCCH, ASA M&RA, OCAR, and NGB General Officer Steering Committee Council of Colonels

ARFORGEN Cycle Screening TOUCH POINT #1 Pre-deployment Health Assessment: Screening 1-120-60 days pre-deployment screening and intervention for deployability and risk assessment. Screening 2-2 months before estimated date of deployment. Screener: Primary Care, given at SRP, provider reviewed and referrals given when indicated. NDAA 2010 requires face to face provider screening. Enablers: Automated Behavioral Health Clinic (ABHC), Virtual Behavioral Health (VBH), Face to Face Mode: DD FORM 2795 Outcome: Risks are identified in advance and mitigated to retain Soldier for deployment. Stratifies Risk. Target: Medical and behavioral health for Soldiers. Proposed: Medical and behavioral health for Family. TOUCH POINT #5 Periodic Health Assessment Screening: Annual screening and intervention. Screener: Primary Care and Behavioral Health provider. NDAA 2010 requires face to face provider screening. Enablers: ABHC, RESPECT.Mil, Face to Face Mode: Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Outcome: Identifies residual risk and delayed onset of behavioral health and medical issues. Stratifies risk. Target: Medical and behavioral health for Soldiers. Proposed: Medical and behavioral health for Family. TOUCH POINT #4 Reintegration PDHRA: 90-180 days re-deployment screening and intervention for risk assessment with additional BH assessment and wellness intervention. Screener: Primary Care, given at SRP, provider reviewed and referrals given when indicated. NDAA 2010 requires face to face provider screening. Enablers: ABHC, VBH, face to face Mode: DD Form 2900 + SAT I / SAT II Outcome: Identifies residual risk and delayed onset of behavioral health and medical issues. Stratifies risk. Target: Medical and behavioral health for Soldiers. Proposed: Medical and behavioral health for Family. TOUCH POINT #2 In-theater prior to redeployment: 15-90 days screening for risk assessment. Screener: Leader generated risk assessment. Enablers: ABHC, Operational Medical Assets Mode: Down-Range Assessment Tool (D-RAT) Outcome: Identify at-risk Soldiers and communicate to Reverse SRP site to assist reintegration. Stratifies risk. Target: Soldiers (legal, financial, disciplinary, relational, resilience, and behavioral health). Proposed: Expanded Family risk assessment. TOUCH POINT #3 Reintegration PDHA: 6-30 days (before block leave) redeployment screening for risk assessment with additional BH assessment and wellness intervention. Screener: Primary Care and Behavioral Health Provider. NDAA 2010 requires face to face provider screening. Enablers: ABHC, VBH, face to face Mode: DD FORM 2796 + SAT I / SAT II Outcome: Immediate intervention for high risk Soldiers, support to Soldiers as indicated. Stratifies risk. Target: Medical and behavioral health for Soldiers. Proposed: Medical and behavioral health for Family.