Clear Policy Needed on the Effects of Pregnancy When Seeking a Commission EWS Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain Dones, A. R.

Similar documents
Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Redefining how Relative Values are determined on Fitness Reports EWS Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain S.R. Walsh to Maj Tatum 19 Feb 08

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

The Affect of Division-Level Consolidated Administration on Battalion Adjutant Sections

SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? Submitted by Capt Mark C. Brown CG #15. Majors Dixon and Duryea EWS 2005

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Marine Corps Mentoring Program. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. D. Watson to CG #10 FACAD: Major P. J. Nugent 07 February 2006

The Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test: The Need to Replace it with a Combat Fitness Test EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain E. M.

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Sustaining the Marine Corps Martial Arts Program. EWS Contemporary Issues Paper. Submitted by Captain G.S. Rooker. Major Gelerter / Major Uecker, CG#3

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

The Need for NMCI. N Bukovac CG February 2009

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Adapting the Fitness Report: Evolving an intangible quality into a tangible evaluation to

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

The Need for a New Battery Option. Subject Area General EWS 2006

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Submitted by Captain RP Lynch To Major SD Griffin, CG February 2006

Closing the Barn Doors After the Cows Have Left: MCRC s Solution to the Recruiter Shortfall EWS Subject Area Manpower

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Wildland Fire Assistance

MAKING IT HAPPEN: TRAINING MECHANIZED INFANTRY COMPANIES

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

Report Documentation Page

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Acquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Improving the Tank Scout. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain R.L. Burton CG #3, FACADs: Majors A.L. Shaw and W.C. Stophel 7 February 2006

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

The Landscape of the DoD Civilian Workforce

Report No. D July 25, Guam Medical Plans Do Not Ensure Active Duty Family Members Will Have Adequate Access To Dental Care

Blue on Blue: Tracking Blue Forces Across the MAGTF Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain D.R. Stengrim to: Major Shaw, CG February 2005

Marine Officer Promotions: Incentivizing and Retaining Top Performers. Captain Michael J. Lorino

Area Fire Weapons in a Precision Environment: Field Artillery in the MOUT Fight

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

SPECIAL REPORT Unsurfaced Road Maintenance Management. Robert A. Eaton and Ronald E. Beaucham December 1992

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

New Tactics for a New Enemy By John C. Decker

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

The Shake and Bake Noncommissioned Officer. By the early-1960's, the United States Army was again engaged in conflict, now in

Drinking Water Operator Certification and Certificate to Operate Criteria/Requirements for US Navy Overseas Drinking Water Systems

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

2011 Military Health System Conference

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Where Have You Gone MTO? Captain Brian M. Bell CG #7 LTC D. Major

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Joint Terminal Attack Controller, A Primary MOS For The Future. EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain M.J. Carroll to Major P.M.

Karen S. Guice, MD, MPP Executive Director Federal Recovery Coordination Program MHS, January 2011

Shallow-Water Mine Countermeasure Capability for USMC Ground Reconnaissance Assets EWS Subject Area Warfighting

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act: Background and Issues

Potential Savings from Substituting Civilians for Military Personnel (Presentation)

Veterans Benefits: Federal Employment Assistance

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

The Air Force's Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Competitive Procurement

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Systems Engineering Capstone Marketplace Pilot

Transcription:

Clear Policy Needed on the Effects of Pregnancy When Seeking a Commission EWS Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain Dones, A. R. to Major Thiele, G. A., CG 2 19 February 2008

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 19 FEB 2008 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2008 to 00-00-2008 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Clear Policy Needed on the Effects of Pregnancy When Seeking a Commission 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) United States Marine Corps,Command and Staff College, Marine Corps University,2076 South Street, Marine Corps Combat Development Command,Quantico,VA,22134-5068 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 14 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Behind each law changing battle exists a personal struggle, one woman's story serving as the catalyst to justice. - A. R. Dones Scenario In February 2001, a staff sergeant on the Marine Enlisted Commissioning Education Program (MECEP) in Chicago, Illinois, was told that upon graduation her commission would be delayed due to her pregnancy. She was told that being pregnant was a disqualifying factor to being commissioned and that she would not be commissioned until she could pass a physical fitness test (PFT) after giving birth. The staff sergeant had fulfilled all requirements: She had completed Officer Candidate School, a PFT (while two months pregnant) and scored a 277, and was to graduate that May from the university she was attending. In January 2001 (one month before being informed of her commissioning delay), she had taken her commissioning physical. The examining doctor, S. H. Isaacma approved her as "physically qualified (PQ) for pre-commission." The staff sergeant requested mast 1 to the Commanding General, Marine Corps Recruiting Command (CG, MCRC). She also submitted a request for review of her case to the Board of 1 Request Mast is an administrative process in which Marines may bring a grievance to their chain of command. MCO 1700.23F is the order on Request Mast. 2

Corrections for Naval Records (BCNR). In each case, the policy was cited as nonnegotiable. In the CG, MCRC's reply to the staff sergeant he wrote, "These prohibitions are in effect because the requirements applied to your change in status from enlisted to officer. While women can function, while pregnant, in a wide variety of military jobs, we would not enlist a pregnant female, and commissioning, as a change in status, follows the same arrangement, and it, in many ways, is not a continuation of your enlisted career, but a complete dissolution of that and replacement with something qualitatively different-- a new beginning." 2 The BCNR concurred with General Park's reply. 3 2 This quote is part of General Park's (at the time CG, MCRC) response to Staff Sergeant Dones' request mast; part of the BCNR Docket Number 3390-03. 3 The information gathered for this scenario is from personal experience. At the time, I was the staff sergeant in the scenario. 3

Introduction Despite the fact that current language applies to pregnant females who are not yet service members, these orders were applied to an enlisted staff noncommissioned officer, and the staff sergeant's commissioning was delayed because of higher's decision to apply the same "arrangement." To avoid future injustices, this policy must be revised. Specifically, the Marine Corps' policy on commissioning programs must be updated for female enlisted military members because the current policy is vague, illogical, and discriminatory. Current Policy One cannot reference a standing order without being sent to another order, which in turn references yet another order. In MCO 5000.12E, no mention is given to how a pregnancy can affect a servicewoman's commission. 4 Since the order applies to current Marines, the issue of enlistment into the Marine Corps by default is governed by the Navy regulations (MANMED, BUMED, and OPNAVINST 6000.1A). Per the MANMED, a current pregnancy is disqualifying for enlistment and new candidates who are to be 4 Department of the Navy, MCO 5000.12E, Marine Corps Policy Concerning Pregnancy and Parenthood, 8 December 2004, URL:<http://www.usmc.mil/directiv. nsf/73dd6bb050e72cf385256bca0072322f/5509634021c7e8a68525649700645423/$file/ MCO%205000.12E.pdf>, accessed 4 November 2007. 4

commissioned; 5 however, this policy references DODINST 6130.4. Per DODINST 6130.4, a current pregnancy is disqualifying until six months after the end of the pregnancy, before appointment, enlistment or induction into the Armed forces. 6 Vague The Department of Defense, Navy, and Marine Corps policies on pregnancy are vague because they do not distinguish between a female civilian requesting enlistment or appointment, and a female servicewoman attaining a commission. Rather, interpretation is left to the reader. The Marine Corps fails further by not addressing the issue other than deferring to Navy regulations. In example, MCO 5000.12E discusses assignment/deployment limitations, as well as, shipboard/aviation assignment. However, in neither paragraph is the limitation on commissioning mentioned. The order references 21 other orders in establishing policy (SECNAVINSTs, BUMEDINSTs, OPNAVINSTs, NEHC-6260-TM-01, and other MCOs), and none cover pregnancy during a commissioning program. 5 Department of the Navy. NAVMED P-117. Manual of the Medical Department. 12 August 2005. URL:<http://www.brooksidepress. org/products/manmed/changes/manmed%20change%20126.pdf>. Accessed 4 November 2007. 6 Department of Defense. Instruction 6130.4. Medical Standards for Appointment, Enlistment, or Induction in the Armed Forces. 18 January 2005. URL:<http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/613004p.pdf>. Accessed 8 December 2007. 5

Vagueness is evident in the policies' verbiage. The purpose of SECNAVINST 1000.10 is as follows: a. To provide a DON policy for all military personnel on pregnancy and issues related to pregnant servicewomen that will build positively on existing programs in the Navy and Marine Corps to ensure quality of opportunity while maintaining operational readiness; b. To expand the requirements for education and training; c. To establish a requirement for the collection of objective data, and analysis of information for use in evaluation of DON pregnancy policies; d. To help guide the department s future efforts in this area. 7 The introduction of information on pregnancy for MCO 5000.12E is as follows: As indicated in reference (a), pregnancy is a natural event that can occur in the lives of Marines and Sailors, and can be compatible with a successful naval career. 8 and the overriding concern for commander's and supervisory personnel, and health care providers responsible for pregnant servicewomen serving with the Marine Corps is...to provide for the health and safety of the servicewoman and her unborn child while maintaining optimum job and career performance. Policy and procedures are required to ensure the health, welfare, and administrative support of pregnant Marines and Sailors, and to minimize the impact a pregnancy has on operational readiness. 9 The purpose of OPNAVINST 6000.1B is as follows: To provide administrative guidance concerning pregnant 7 Department of the Navy. SECNAVINST 1000.10. Department of the Navy (DON) Policy on Pregnancy. 6 February 1995. URL:<http://www.brooksidepress.org/ Products/OperationalMedicine/DATA/operationalmed/Instructions/1000_10.pdf>. Accessed 14 February 2008. 8 See note 4. 9 See note 4. 6

servicewomen, and to promote uniformity in the medicaladministrative management of normal pregnancies per references (a) through (m). This instruction is a complete revision and should be reviewed in its entirety. 10 In an opening subparagraph the order then states that "pregnancy status will not adversely affect the career patterns of Navy servicewomen." 11 In the opening scenario, the Marine Corps' response and the BCNR's response to the staff sergeant's pregnancy do not seem consistent with the intent of policy: The determination did not build positively on existing programs in the Marine Corps; did not treat pregnancy as a natural event that can occur in the life of a Marine; and it is not compatible with a successful naval career. Rather, it treated the pregnancy status as an adverse impact on the career pattern of a naval servicewoman. Illogical The current policies are illogical. Specifically, a current servicewoman seeking a commission logically should not be treated as a female civilian seeking a commission. A civilian female seeking an appointment has not met the standard, she has not gone through the entry-level training, much less the 10 Department of the Navy. OPNAVINST 6000.1B. Guidelines Concerning Pregnant Service Women. 4 March 2003. URL:<http://doni.daps.dla.mil/Directives/ 06000%20Medical%20and%20Dental%20Services/0600%20General%20Medical%20and%20De ntal%20support%20services/6000.1b.pdf>. Accessed 4 November 2007. 11 See note 10. 7

sustained training required in service. Treating a servicewoman seeking a commission like a female civilian seeking a commission is to deny a servicewoman positive career progression. In fact, denying the staff noncommissioned officer appointment punishes the servicewoman who has been recognized to have high performance (in selection to/completion of a highly competitive program). Similarly, the policies do not allow for the fact that a servicewoman can get pregnant the day after her commission or get pregnant while in training without adverse impact. A commissioning physical must be completed, and the servicemember found physically qualified prior to commissioning/appointment. Any female (enlisted or civilian) who becomes pregnant after the physical has an opportunity to withhold the information until after the ceremony, i.e., a servicewoman can become pregnant a day to three months before her commissioning date and not inform the command and still get commissioned. Therefore, the current policy encourages a pregnant servicewoman to withhold information. Additionally, by treating the enlisted servicemember the same as a candidate, a servicemember's enlisted career is considered "dissolved" once commissioned. Yet the enlisted record stays part of the servicemember's official military 8

personnel file. A new one is not created to cover only the commissioned service and the enlisted record is not archived separately. Another illogical decision raised by the staff sergeant's scenario is the determination made by the BCNR in their response to Docket Number 3390-03. The BCNR states that OPNAVINST 6000.1B does not apply to Marines. However, the Marine Corps policy on pregnancy makes direct reference to OPNAVINST 6000.1B. Therefore, the Marine Corps use of the OPNAVINST makes it applicable to Marines. Discriminatory Delaying a servicewoman's commission due to pregnancy puts her behind her peers: Less seniority than those she would have been commissioned with (later date of rank and later promotion eligibility to next rank). In not being commissioned a female Marine remains in her present grade and is eligible to compete noncompetitively for promotion to the next rank. The Marine Corps is saying that the staff sergeant rates eligibility for a promotion but not a commission. The conclusion to be drawn is that a pregnant enlisted woman does not rate to be commissioned, whereas an enlisted woman who is not pregnant does. The private sector treats pregnancy as a natural condition and limits an employee's status only under The Americans with Disability Act (ADA): A woman's doctor decides when/if her pregnancy is disabling and from that point on, she is treated 9

just as any man or women who is disabled. 12 Yet the military treats pregnancy separately, thereby discriminating against pregnant personnel. Counter Argument Counter: Opponents will argue that the Marine Corps policy on pregnancy is based on what is in the best interest of the servicewoman's health and the operational readiness of the Marine Corps. 13 With those priorities in mind, it would be in both the servicewoman's and the Marine Corps' interest not to commission a pregnant servicewoman until after the child's birth due to the possibilities of complications. Response: The Marine Corps does not take the same attitude toward promoting active duty woman to their next rank. The bias lies in an enlisted servicewoman's transition from the enlisted ranks to commissioned status. Counter: Technically speaking, an enlisted Marine seeking a commission signs and receives a DD214 form (Discharge of Military Service). This action/completion of the form renders the Marine's contract complete/null. The "former Marine" is now "technically" a civilian. Immediately following the signing of the DD214 form, the Marine then signs a NAVMC 763 (Appointment 12 Department of Labor. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. URL:<www.dol.gov/esa/regs/statues/ofccp/ada.htm>. Accessed 19 February 2008. 13 See note 4. 10

to a Commission) and becomes a commissioned officer. Prior to signing the NAVMC 763, the person to be commissioned is governed by the standing orders/policies of entry/appointment into the military service as any other civilian would be. Therefore, no law that applies to an active duty or reserve servicemember applies to the individual being commissioned. Response: If an enlisted Marine is commissioned while married to another enlisted Marine, the couple can stay married; even though the relationship by default of the commission becomes fraternization. The Marine Corps needs to take the same logical initiative in the pregnancy policy regarding a commission/appointment of an enlisted female Marine. Counter: The Marine Corps does not restrict a female Marine's right to have a child. The decision to have a child is made by the individual. The Marine Corps does note that responsibilities come with parenthood, and for those in uniform, these responsibilities require increased consideration and planning due to military commitments. Marines are expected to balance the demands of a naval career with their family plans and responsibilities. The Marine Corps pregnancy policy is clear, logical and nondiscriminatory; however, female Marines have the responsibility to consider how the pregnancy may affect her military requirements and operational readiness. 11

Response: A pregnant servicewoman's demands at work/home are not different if she is an enlisted servicemember or a commissioned officer. The same responsibilities are taken into account. Conclusion Anatomy is not something the Marine Corps can change, but the policies the Marine Corps uses can be written in a clear, logical, and nondiscriminatory manner so that a pregnancy does not hinder the career advancement of a female Marine. The Marine Corps makes logical exceptions to technically unlawful circumstances, i.e., in the case of a dual active duty couple having one member seek a commission while the other remains enlisted. The Marine Corps needs to revise MCO 5000.12E and make it clear, logical, and nondiscriminatory in application to commissioning programs. Word Count 1901 12

Bibliography Department of Defense. Instruction 6130.4. Medical Standards for Appointment, Enlistment, or Induction in the Armed Forces. 18 January 2005. URL:<http://www.dtic.mil/whs/ directives/corres/pdf/613004p.pdf>. Accessed 8 December 2007. Department of Labor. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. URL:<www.dol.gov/esa/regs/statues/ofccp/ada.htm>. Accessed 19 February 2008. Department of the Navy. SECNAVINT 1000.10. Department of the Navy (DON) Policy on Pregnancy. 6 February 1995. URL:< http://www.brooksidepress.org/products/operational Medicine/DATA/operationalmed/Instructions/1000_10.pdf>. Accessed 14 February 2008. Department of the Navy. MCO 1560.15L. Marine Corps Enlisted Education Program (MECEP). 16 August 1994. URL:< http:// www.usmc.mil/directiv.nsf/bc9ae2674a92558d852569140064e9d8/ fafd940586ee59618525677c006bfe0e/$file/mco%201560.15l.pdf>. Accessed 4 November 2007. Department of the Navy. MCO 1700.23F. Request Mast. 22 March 2007. URL:<http://www.usmc.mil/directiv.nsf/82001916d2268 93285256d12004936dd/2460c5edbeae70ec852572c20058ef62/$FILE/ MCO%201700.23F.pdf>. Accessed 14 February 2008. Department of the Navy. MCO 5000.12E. Marine Corps Policy Concerning Pregnancy and Parenthood. 8 December 2004. URL:< http://www.usmc.mil/directiv.nsf/73dd6bb050e72cf385256 bca0072322f/5509634021c7e8a68525649700645423/$file/ MCO%205000.12E.pdf>. Accessed 4 November 2007. Department of the Navy. NAVMED P-117. Manual of the Medical Department. 12 August 2005. URL:<http://www.brooksidepress.org/Products/ManMed/Changes/manmed%20change%20126.pdf>. Accessed 4 November 2007. Department of the Navy. OPNAVINST 6000.1B. Guidelines Concerning Pregnant Service Women. 4 March 2003. URL: <http://doni.daps.dla.mil/directives/06000%20medical%20and %20Dental%20Services/0600%20General%20Medical%20and%20 Dental%20Support%20Services/6000.1B.pdf>. Accessed 4 November 2007. 13

Dones, Aixa R., Staff Sergeant, USMC, Board of Naval Corrections Docket Number 3390-03. 1 October 2003. Personal papers, accessed 4 November 2007. 14