Fostering a Healthier Community. Serving Our Neighbors. Investing in Meaningful Transformation. Services to Ex-offenders and Their Families

Similar documents
WRITTEN TESTIMONY SUBMITTED BY DOUGLAS SMITH, MSSW TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE COALITION

TARRANT COUNTY DIVERSION INITIATIVES

Reducing Recidivism for Ex-offenders Returning to Essex County

DOC & PRISONER REENTRY

annual REPORT Introduction July 1st, 2011

Prisoner Reentry and Adult Education. With our time together, we propose

Annual Report

Harris County Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Harris County Sequential Intercept Model

OFFENDER REENTRY PROGRAM

Rehabilitative Programs and Services

Addressing the needs of inmates with mental illness and/or substance abuse disorders. Taking the Sequential Intercept Model to the Next Level

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

Introduction. Jail Transition: Challenges and Opportunities. National Institute

OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER Matthew Foley

Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction (MIOCR) Program. Michael S. Carona, Sheriff~Coroner Orange County Sheriff s s Department

STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES

Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates

2016 Bidders Conference for Requests for Proposals (RFPs)

Randomized Controlled Trials to Test Interventions for Frequent Utilizers of Multiple Health, Criminal Justice, and Social Service Systems

2007 Innovations Awards Program APPLICATION

2016 Council of State Governments Justice Center

Marin County STAR Program: Keeping Severely Mentally Ill Adults Out of Jail and in Treatment

Justice-Involved Veterans

Overview of Recommendations to Champaign County Regarding the Criminal Justice System

New Spiritual Communities and ReNewing Churches: Grant Program Application

H.B Implementation Report

Program Guidelines and Procedures Supersedes: January 6, for Adult Transitional Case Management

3B. Continuum of Care (CoC) Discharge Planning: Foster Care

VOCATIONAL & LIFE SKILLS PROGRAM

Addressing the Re-entry Needs of Inmates with Serious Mental Illness. Council for State Governments St. Petersburg, Florida July 8, 2008

Nebraska Department of Correctional Services. Reentry Services VOCATIONAL & LIFE SKILLS PROGRAM

Eau Claire County Mental Health Court. Presentation December 15, 2011

April L. Lyons, MSN, RN Director of Clinical Operations Westside Family Healthcare

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

OPENING DOORS TO PUBLIC HOUSING Request for Proposals (RFP) for Technical Assistance

2018 Themes NUMBER OF AWARDS SELECTION CRITERIA

Defining the Nathaniel ACT ATI Program

Non-Time Limited Supportive Housing Program for Youth Request for Proposals for Supportive Housing Providers (RFP)

OUTCOMES MEASURES APPLICATION Adult Baseline Age Group: ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION

Second Chance Act Grants: State, Local, and Tribal Reentry Courts

GOB Project 193 Mental Health Diversion Facility Service Capacity and Fiscal Impact Estimates June 9, 2016

Whittier Street Health Center. Post Prison Release Program established February 2003

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

Forensic Assertive Community Treatment Team (FACT) A bridge back to the community for people with severe mental illness

Washoe County Department of Alternative Sentencing

A Nine to Eighteen Month Residential Aftercare Program

Agenda: Community Supervision Subgroup

Nathaniel Assertive Community Treatment: New York County Alternative to Incarceration Program. May 13, 2011 ACT Roundtable Meeting

How to make the Affordable Care Act work for you

The Criminal Justice Population & ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE IN SALT LAKE COUNTY

MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA NEW MEDICAID CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES

Steven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer

DISABILITY-RELATED INQUIRIES CONCERNING INDIVIDUALS INCARCERATED IN PRISON. Prepared by the Disability Rights Network of Pennsylvania

Phone #: (936) Manager III Marvin Dunbar AUTHORITY

Fresno County, Department of Behavioral Health Full Service Partnership Program Outcomes Reporting Period Fiscal Year (FY)

The Transition from Jail to Community (TJC) Initiative

Planned Respite Referral Application

CONNECTING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE POPULATION TO CARE

PART 1: SELF ASSESSMENT

North Carolina Conference of The United Methodist Church P.O. Box 1970, Garner, NC Fax:

*Chapter 3 - Community Corrections

Office of Criminal Justice System Improvements Pretrial Drug and Alcohol Initiative. Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Solicitation

OKLAHOMA COLLABORATIVE MENTAL HEALTH & SUBSTANCE ABUSE REENTRY PROGRAMS Dr. Janna Morgan Ph.D. Department of Corrections Donna Bond LPC Department of

APPLICATION FOR: CHILDREN S MINISTRY ASSISTANT 2016

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Funding Guidelines for Local Community Outreach Grants 2018:

OUTCOMES MEASURES APPLICATION

Drug Court Mental Health Court Veterans Court

COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT RESPONDS TO INCREASED GANG ACTIVITY

Bryan Brandenburg. Director, Division of Institutions, State of Alaska, Dept. of Corrections.

THE BUILDING AND ITS OCCUPANTS

Statement of. Nancy G. La Vigne Director, Justice Policy Center, The Urban Institute. Before the. Judiciary Subcommittee on

JAG EBDM Jail Reentry Pilot Sites Project (2016)

Community Public Safety Repair Plan

5/25/2010 REENTRY COURT PROGRAM

ALTERNATIVES FOR MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS

Characteristics of Adults on Probation, 1995

Behavioral Health Services. San Francisco Department of Public Health

Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109)

2 nd Circuit Court- District Division- Plymouth PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK 5/11/16

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

JANUARY 2013 REPORT FINDINGS AND INTERIM RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS. Legislative Budget Board Criminal Justice Forum October 4, 2013

A Strategic Planning Framework for Prisoner Reentry TARGETS FOR POLICY CHANGE THAT GUIDE IMPLEMENTATION

Speaker: Ruby Qazilbash. Ruby Qazilbash Associate Deputy Director Bureau of Justice Assistance Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice

Leaving No Veteran Behind: The Policy Implications Identified at the 5th Annual Justice Involved Veterans Conference. Andrew Keller, PhD May 14, 2014

Factors Impacting Recidivism in Vermont. Report to House and Senate Committees April 21, 2011

Nevada Department of Public Safety Division of Parole and Probation PAROLE AND PROBATION RE-ENTRY PROGRAMS

Assisted Outpatient Treatment

Church Shut-In Visitation Program

2018 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

Introduction to Grants

The Behavioral Health System. Presentation to the House Select Committee on Mental Health

Congregational Health Network (CHN) What is the Congregational Health Network?

April 16, The Honorable Shirley Weber Chair Assembly Budget, Subcommittee No. 5 on Public Safety State Capitol, Room 3123 Sacramento CA 95814

Miami-Dade County Mental Health Diversion Facility July 2016

Estimated Eligible Population for the Proposed Second Chance Program

TJJD the Big Picture OBJECTIVES

Testimony of Michael C. Potteiger, Chairman Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole House Appropriations Committee February 12, 2014

Transcription:

Fostering a Healthier Community. Serving Our Neighbors. Investing in Meaningful Transformation. Services to Ex-offenders and Their Families Strategic Funding Plan 2014 2018

Agenda Brief Overview: Lutheran Foundation Funding Focus Area: Services to Ex-offenders & Their Families Logic Models Impact Areas Outcome Statements Evaluation Grant Application How to Apply Questions & Answers

Lutheran Foundation of St. Louis A Brief Overview

Our History Began with vision of Rev. Johann Buenger Formed Lutheran Hospital in 1858 Sold in 1984 Grantmaking ministry of 63 St. Louis area LCMS congregations Grown assets from $34M to $100M Granted $94M+ to 550+ congregations, schools, & nonprofit organizations

Brief Overview: Lutheran Foundation Vision Lutheran Foundation of St. Louis sees the Church brought into the lives of hurting people and people included in the healing life of the Church. Mission To the honor of Christ Jesus, we seek the improved care of people in the greater St. Louis metropolitan region.

Our Core Values Connection to Health & Wholeness Measurable Outcomes Connection to Faith Collaboration St. Louis-Based

Lutheran Foundation Funding Focus Areas Christian Volunteerism Congregation Social Service Outreach Ministry Lutheran Education Older Adults Maintaining Independence Services to Ex-offenders and Their Families Supporting Foreign-Born Populations

Changes Addition of Impact Areas Recommended Outcomes Rethinking tracking and evaluation Modifications to Grant Application

Services to Ex-offenders & Their Families A Brief Overview

Services to Ex-offenders & Their Families Goal To support the successful reintegration of ex-offenders by restoring their lives and family relationships, thereby enhancing community stability and public safety. Target Population Criminal justice involved adults who are either currently under community supervision, in a local jail, or were formerly incarcerated, and the families of offenders.

Funding Interests* Employment services Substance abuse treatment Mental health treatment Educational/vocational programs Affordable housing Transportation Life skills Maintaining and/or developing healthy family relationships or social supports Access to preventative care Diagnosis and management of chronic health conditions Transitional services for reentry into community Services for children of parent(s) with criminal justice history Services for spouses, partners or other significant family members of person(s) with criminal justice history *List not exhaustive

Logic Models A Brief Overview

Logic Models: Definition A systematic & visual way to present & share your understanding of the relationships among the resources you have to operate your program (inputs), the activities you plan to do (activities/services), and the changes or results you hope to achieve (outcomes/impact). W.K. Kellogg Foundation A simple, visual way to show your program from soup to nuts

Your road map!

Logic Models: Purpose Why Use One Serves as a: planning framework communication instrument evaluation tool Keeps you: on the same page on task on mission

Example Scenario Many former offenders reentering the community lack the skills necessary to obtain gainful employment. The inability to secure income upon release lessens the likelihood of successful reentry. Successful reentry back into the community is an issue of community stability and public safety. ABC Non-Profit, Inc. will offer soft skills and vocational training for former offenders released from jail and who are living in the City of St. Louis. The proposed project will target 75 former offenders within three months of their release from incarceration who have committed a misdemeanor offense.

Grant Application: Population Served & Goals Goals Give general direction and overall purpose of project Goal #1 Increase vocational skills of former offenders in order to secure gainful and sustainable employment. Goal #2 Reduce recidivism rates of former offenders reentering the St. Louis community. Population Served Describe target population and number to be served 75 male and female former inmates with misdemeanor offenses residing in the City of St. Louis

Impact Areas Clarify major changes sought Do not need to address all three Impact Areas

Impact Areas Impact Area #1: Ex-offenders will maintain or experience improved mental, physical, and/or spiritual health. Impact Area #2: Ex-offenders will experience increased prosocial community involvement and stability. Impact Area #3: Ex-offenders will experience increased positive relationships with a support person(s), family, and/or network.

Where Do We Begin?

Outcomes

Outputs vs. Outcomes Outputs Things you count what happens because of what you do Short-term measure of program activities Numbers served Number of services provided Outcomes Change you see why it matters what you do Effects of program activities on client: Behaviors Attitudes Knowledge Perceptions

Outputs vs. Outcomes Outputs Outcomes

Outputs vs. Outcomes Outputs Outcomes

Outputs vs. Outcomes Outputs Outcomes

Outcomes Short-term outcomes Measure knowledge, attitude, skills change Typically measure change at end of services or 1 st phase of services Intermediate outcomes Measure behavioral change Typically measure change within short time after services end or during/end of 2 nd phase of services Longer-term outcomes Measure behavioral, social, economic, &/or environmental change Measure change at longer point in time after services end

Tracking Outcomes First Year: 3-5 short-term outcomes for clients (current) Second Year: 3-5 intermediate outcomes for clients (completed) short-term outcomes for clients (current) Additional Years: 3-5 longer-term outcomes for clients (completed) intermediate outcomes for clients (completed) short-term outcomes for clients (current)

Recommended Outcomes - Example Impact Area #1: Ex-offenders will maintain or experience improved mental, physical, and/or spiritual health. Short-term Outcomes # and % of ex-offenders who demonstrate an increased knowledge and capacity to manage a physical and/or mental health condition. Intermediate Outcomes # and % of ex-offenders diagnosed with mental health conditions who remain free of psychiatric symptoms at X days post program completion. Longer-term Outcomes # and % of ex-offenders diagnosed with mental health conditions who remain free of psychiatric symptoms at X months post program completion.

Outcomes More outcomes are not necessarily better Must track all outcomes listed

Outcomes

Evaluation

Evaluation What It Does Answers the questions: Did I really do what I said I was going to do with the people that I said I was going to do it with? Did we help or harm folks? Why Do It Allows you to tell your story in multiple languages Answers: Are resources being used well? Ethical responsibility Celebrate success!

Evaluation Focuses on 3 key questions: Process How has my program made a difference? People How are the lives of program participants better as a result of my program? Results What outcomes were achieved by the participants in the program & how do I know this?

Evaluation: Model Outcomes Data Source Applied to Data Interval

Evaluation: Definitions Data Source Tools, documents, & locations for information that will show what happened Applied To Who the data source is applied to Data Interval Points in time when data is collected

Data Sources: Examples Documentation of attendance rosters Pre and Post tests of skill-development sessions content to measure knowledge change Interviews and/or focus groups Documentation (case notes) of case management meetings including follow-up meetings Follow-up with participants via phone, email and postal mail to track and gather data related to project Records from third party agencies (ex. Missouri Office of Probation and Parole records regarding re-arrests and re-incarceration rates of project participants)

Evaluation: Example (Short-term Outcomes) Outcome Data Source Applied To Data Interval 65% (50) of participants will graduate from the vocational training program 60% (45) of participants will complete their case plan goals 65% (50) of participants will demonstrate increased knowledge regarding soft skills, budgeting and time management

Evaluation: Example (Short-term Outcomes) Outcome Data Source Applied To Data Interval 65% (50) of participants will graduate from the vocational training program Documentation of attendance rosters from all vocational training sessions and number of students graduating from program All participants Graduation from program 60% (45) of participants will complete their case plan goals Documentation (case notes) of case management sessions All participants Graduation from program 65% (50) of participants will demonstrate increased knowledge regarding soft skills, budgeting and time management Pre and post tests for soft skills, budgeting and time management classes All participants Graduation from program

Modified Grant Application Section by Section

Grant Application: Key Components Narrative Faith Connection (added by Lutheran Foundation) Needs Statement Project Information Volunteer Involvement Budget

Grant Application: Narrative Organization Background Founding & development of organization Original issue & how it has changed Organization Overview Current services & expected results Population & numbers served *Note: Current services ONLY, not the PROPOSED project (Section D)

Grant Application: Faith Connection (added by Lutheran Foundation) Do not try to be something that you are not Include connections with Lutheran and other Christian congregations and/or organizations Identify faith incorporation in services

Grant Application: Needs Statement Provide LOCAL context Use data Describe a problem that is about same size as your solution Problem Solution

Grant Application: Project Information Population Served Goals Activities Foundation Impact Areas Outcomes Collaboration Differentiating Factors Key Players Long-term Goals & Funding Approach Timeline

Project Information: Timeline & Collaboration Timeline Explain key dates chronologically Collaboration Describe significant interactions with other organizations Do not just create a long list of agencies

Project Information: Differentiating Factors & Key Players Differentiating Factors What makes your project unique Key Players Describe roles of different people associated with project

Project Information: Long-term Goals, Funding & Approach Long-term Goals & Funding Address program sustainability Approach Describe evidence-based, best, or promising practices

Grant Application: Volunteer Involvement Number and role of volunteers Identify Christian volunteers

Grant Application: Budget Ok to add extra rows Not every line item will be applicable (leave blank) Complete narrative and budget template Identify existing vs. new vs. expanded expenses

Budget: Narrative Translates your program into dollars and cents Explains cost estimation Justifies need for each item Details Expenses and Revenues

Completed template

Attachments Double check Correct number of copies

How to Apply

Application Process Applications available on website www.lutheranfoundation.org Application deadlines*: Decisions Made: December 1 February 28 June 1 August 31 *No deadline for Congregation Mini Grants Meet with staff prior to application submission Refer to User s Guide Use resources available on website

Resources Best Practice Resources Resources Principles for Evidence-Based Practices Risk Factors and Needs of Justice Involved Adults (aka "Central Eight") Behavioral Adjustment Programs Case Management Educational Programs/Services Employment Programs/Services Family Programs/Services Housing Programs/Services Mental Health Programs/Services Mentoring Programs/Services Substance Abuse Programs/Services St. Louis Alliance for Reentry (STAR) Urban Institute National Reentry Resource Center Evidence Based Programming

Send Me St. Louis Vision: To see the Church engage its unique role in the community to transform the lives of hurting people. Focus: Christian volunteerism Congregation social service outreach Services: Training Coaching/mentoring Resourcing Serving opportunities www.sendmestlouis.org

Questions & Answers

Contact Us! Lutheran Foundation of St. Louis 314.231.2244 www.lutheranfoundation.org Ann Vazquez, President/CEO ann@lutheranfoundation.org Melinda McAliney, Program Director melinda@lutheranfoundation.org

Fostering a Healthier Community. Serving Our Neighbors. Investing in Meaningful Transformation.