STATEMENT OF CAPTAIN RICHARD B. HALL II, MD MEDICAL CORPS, UNITED STATES NAVY COMMAND SURGEON UNITED STATES EUROPEAN COMMAND

Similar documents
STATEMENT OF COLONEL RONALD A. MAUL COMMAND SURGEON US CENTRAL COMMAND

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF COLONEL STEPHEN L. JONES, UNITED STATES ARMY COMMAND SURGEON

Navy Medicine. Commander s Guidance

STATEMENT BY GENERAL RICHARD A. CODY VICE CHIEF OF STAFF UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release December 5, 2016

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

Fighter/ Attack Inventory

FORWARD, READY, NOW!

HEALTH SERVICE SUPPORT IN CORPS AND ECHELONS ABOVE CORPS

Georgia and World War II

The War in Europe 5.2

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

STATEMENT OF REAR ADMIRAL TERRY J. MOULTON, MSC, USN DEPUTY SURGEON GENERAL OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON MILITARY PERSONNEL OF THE

Global Vigilance, Global Reach, Global Power for America

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

The main tasks and joint force application of the Hungarian Air Force

Use of Military Force Authorization Language in the 2001 AUMF

... from the air, land, and sea and in every clime and place!

Naval Vessel Historical Evaluation INITIAL DETERMINATION. This evaluation is unclassified

Ramstein AB, Germany. Major Units 9/4/18. Page 1 of 5. HQ USAFE Civil Engineers Contact Information: DSN: FAX:

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS FIELD MEDICAL TRAINING BATTALION Camp Lejeune, NC

December 21, 2004 NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE NSPD-41 HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE HSPD-13

Analysis of Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Bill: HR Differences Between House and Senate NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

STATEMENT OF DR. WILLIAM WINKENWERDER, JR. ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR HEALTH AFFAIRS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON VETERANS' AFFAIRS

DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION:

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL WILLIAM F. MORAN U.S. NAVY VICE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATE OF THE MILITARY

Beyond Breaking 4 th August 1982

SACT s remarks to UN ambassadors and military advisors from NATO countries. New York City, 18 Apr 2018

The 16th Sustainment Brigade Sustains a Strong Europe

STATEMENT OF MRS. ELLEN P. EMBREY ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR HEALTH AFFAIRS BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

British Contingency Operations since 1945: Back to the Future. Dr Paul Latawski Department of War Studies

ALLIANCE MARITIME STRATEGY

Policy Defence and National Security. Policy highlights. Protecting our interests

Student Guide: Introduction to Army Foreign Disclosure and Contact Officers

NATO MEASURES ON ISSUES RELATING TO THE LINKAGE BETWEEN THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM AND THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

STATEMENT OF VICE ADMIRAL C. FORREST FAISON III, MC, USN SURGEON GENERAL OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBJECT:

ANNEX E MHAT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) Mental Health Advisory Team (MHAT) 16 December 2003

Active Endeavour ATO. NATO naval operations

Directions: Complete the following questions using the website listed below.

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

J. L. Jones General, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant of the Marine Corps

THE MILITARY STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA

Balanced tactical helicopter force

Prepared Remarks for the Honorable Richard V. Spencer Secretary of the Navy Defense Science Board Arlington, VA 01 November 2017

Planning and conducting modern military

USS COLE Commission Report

Russia News. Focus on a more operational partnership. issue 3. NATO-Russia Council (NRC) defence ministers meet informally in Berlin

Northern California Area Maritime Security Committee

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF

HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM US ARMY AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE OPERATIONS

APPENDIX: FUNCTIONAL COMMUNITIES Last Updated: 21 December 2015

SS.7.C.4.3 Describe examples of how the United States has dealt with international conflicts.

September 3, Honorable Robert C. Byrd Ranking Member Committee on Appropriations United States Senate Washington, DC

The Ability of the U.S. Military to Sustain an Occupation in Iraq

D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE

YouGov Survey Results Sample Size: 2,042 Fieldwork: 26th - 28th March 2007

U.S. AIR STRIKE MISSIONS IN THE MIDDLE EAST

Expanding the NATO Movement Control Network

LITHUANIAN DEFENCE SYSTEM: Facts and Trends

Frameworks for Responses to Armed Attack Situations

Panetta Pays Tribute to LRMC Nurses and Staff

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY DR. MIKE GRIFFIN UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING BEFORE THE

How did Military Rivalry contribute to the outbreak of war? L/O To consider how militarism led to increasing tensions between the two alliances

Report No. D April 9, Training Requirements for U.S. Ground Forces Deploying in Support of Operation Iraqi Freedom

UNCLASSIFIED UNITED STATES AFRICA COMMAND WELCOME UNCLASSIFIED

LESSON 2: THE U.S. ARMY PART 1 - THE ACTIVE ARMY

Throughout the course of 2016, Spirit of America s all-veteran field team designed and implemented 94 projects in 34 countries.

Minnesota National Guard Minnesota-Croatia State Partnership Program (SPP) Program Overview

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS FIELD MEDICAL TRAINING BATTALION Camp Lejeune, NC

UNCLASSIFIED. Unclassified

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

GAO. OVERSEAS PRESENCE More Data and Analysis Needed to Determine Whether Cost-Effective Alternatives Exist. Report to Congressional Committees

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Decade of Service 2000s

World War I. Part 3 Over There

STATEMENT OF GENERAL BRYAN D. BROWN, U.S. ARMY COMMANDER UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

Defense Security Cooperation Agency Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation New Dawn Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Emergency-Essential (E-E) DoD U.S. Citizen Civilian Employees

Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Executing Navy s Maritime Strategy

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

M. APPENDIX XIII: EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION 13 - MILITARY SUPPORT

The Global War on Terrorism

Work Period: WW II European Front Notes Video Clip WW II Pacific Front Notes Video Clip. Closing: Quiz

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT TO THE NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY S DISTINGUISHED LECTURE PROGRAM. As Prepared for Delivery on Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Innovation in Military Organizations Fall 2005

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide

3/8/2011. Most of the world wasn t surprised when the war broke out, but some countries were better prepared than others.

THE ESTONIAN DEFENCE FORCES

The War in Europe and North Africa Ch 24-1

U.S. Pacific Command NDIA Science & Engineering Technology Conference

like during World War I?

Hospital and Healthcare Systems. Surge Capacity. Terrorism Preparedness and Response National Defense Industrial Association

National Guard Personnel and Deployments: Fact Sheet

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES

The State Defence Concept Executive Summary

June 25, Honorable Kent Conrad Ranking Member Committee on the Budget United States Senate Washington, DC

NATO C2 in Libya: Coherence from Diversity. Richard E. Hayes Sabrina Fountas Stacey Kaminski

Transcription:

STATEMENT OF CAPTAIN RICHARD B. HALL II, MD MEDICAL CORPS, UNITED STATES NAVY COMMAND SURGEON UNITED STATES EUROPEAN COMMAND SENATE ARMED SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE ON PERSONNEL 13 March 2002 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE ON PERSONNEL

Mr. Chairman, distinguished members of the Subcommittee, it is my pleasure to appear before you today to discuss Medical Readiness in the United States European Command. Medical Readiness is my job. It is the name of the staff division I lead and paramount in every decision I make. As Command Surgeon I have dual responsibilities. First, I ensure our peacetime medical care systems are in place and functioning to support our forces, their dependents, and other beneficiaries. Second, I ensure the medical care we provide to our forces in the field, those at risk both from enemy action and natural diseases, is second to none. Both these aspects are critical to the concept of medical readiness. It is our peacetime health care that ensures soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines go into the fight healthy and fit. These systems immunize them against disease and enhance their morale and mental well being by ensuring their loved ones are well cared for. Perhaps more visible is the second of my responsibilities, the provision of direct medical care to our deployed forces. It is this responsibility that I would like to concentrate on today. U.S. European Command is at this moment engaged in significant medical support to forces in the field. As a supported Commander-in-Chief (CINC), USEUCOM is heavily engaged in current operations including: a large-scale unexploded ordnance mission in Nigeria, enforcing the Northern No Fly Zone over Iraq, conducting peace support operations in Bosnia, Kosovo and the Former Yugoslavia Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) and Maritime Interdiction Operations (MIO) in the Mediterranean. In addition to the numerous activities associated with executing the global war on terrorism in our own Theater, our unified command is also extensively involved in supporting the U.S. Central Command s (USCENTCOM) efforts. USEUCOM provides hospitalization, blood, medical supplies, and patient movement capabilities. 2

In each of these operations, we are applying modern and improved philosophies of contingency medical support. Fundamentally, these philosophies include: protecting our military force from disease and non-battle injuries, stabilizing patients as far forward as possible, and providing rapid and robust aero-medical evacuation to definitive care. I would now like to discuss these points in more detail. Historically, the fighting force suffers more casualties from disease and non-battle injuries than from direct enemy contact. To date, of the Operation ENDURING FREEDOM patients moved to the Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany, 75 percent have been the result of disease and non-battle injuries, with 25 percent of the patients being wounded in action. These numbers are consistent with what we have experienced in the Balkans over the last six years. When available, vaccination programs are one of the very best and most effective means of protecting our troops from disease threats. In this regard, I want to reaffirm our position that the Anthrax Vaccination Program is a critical force protection tool for U.S. military forces. USEUCOM appreciates the vigorous support expressed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Services to support this program. We believe safe and effective vaccination, when available, is our best defense against both natural diseases and bio-terrorist weapons, and we are looking forward to the imminent re-institution of the Total Force vaccination policy for anthrax. Force Health Protection encompasses more than immunization protocols. It is a total approach to maintaining the health of our deployed forces. A revised Joint Staff Memorandum on Deployment Health Surveillance became effective on 1 March 2002. This Memorandum, which we are working hard to implement, mandates a detailed program of medical surveillance to detect disease outbreaks as quickly as possible. In the absence of adequate 3

capabilities to detect and identify pathogenic warfare agents, this near real-time disease reporting initiative provides our most timely detection system for such events. By keeping our forces healthy in a deployed environment we preserve their fighting strength and reduce forward medical requirements. Past conflicts were medically characterized by deploying large hospitals in the field, with the idea that patients could be treated and, if possible, returned to duty without being evacuated. In part, this philosophy was driven by the inability to effectively stabilize and transport patients quickly from the area of conflict. Modern technology has altered this situation and our military medical forces are now stabilizing critically injured patients closer to the forward edge of the battle area than ever before through the use of forward surgical teams. During Operation FOCUS RELIEF last year, for example, we placed a forward surgical team on the ground in Nigeria to support the Special Forces train and equip mission. While attempting to defuse an unexploded light anti-tank weapon, one of our soldiers lost his life and another was critically wounded. The injured soldier was operated on and stabilized by the forward surgical team, and then evacuated to our Theater medical center in Landstuhl, Germany for definitive care. Without a large field hospital, this soldier s life was saved using highly trained medical specialists and responsive patient movement systems. We currently have similar forward surgical teams in the Balkans and in Nigeria and are preparing to field teams in support of the upcoming mission in Georgia as well. In addition, these teams are critical to USCENTCOM efforts in ENDURING FREEDOM. Given the demands for these teams, they are routinely in short supply. 4

Stabilization of the injured far forward is only feasible when we can combine this effort with a responsive patient movement system. United States Air Forces in Europe (USAFE) uses organic C-9 Nightingale medical evacuation aircraft and opportune strategic lift from United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) to execute USEUCOM s patient movement mission. Our Patient Movement Requirements Center at Ramstein Air Base, Germany covers both the USEUCOM and USCENTCOM areas of responsibility in peacetime and during contingency operations. Currently, it is fully engaged in supporting ENDURING FREEDOM operations. Moving a stabilized patient from a forward location to definitive care is only half of the equation. Many critically ill patients also require inflight care provided by specialized critical care transport teams. USEUCOM in-flight medical teams were instrumental in saving the lives of the USS COLE crew members injured in the terrorist attack off the coast of Yemen. In this rescue effort, our most critically injured sailors were initially treated by French surgeons in Djibouti then aero-medically evacuated for definitive care to the Landstuhl Regional Medical Center using the Critical Care Air Transport Teams. Like the Forward Surgical Teams, these air transport teams are highly trained assets. They are critical to stabilizing and rapidly evacuating our people to a higher level of care. The final phase of our medical treatment to support contingency operations depends on the continued ability to maintain the quality care, infrastructure, and range of medical specialties available at our fixed-base clinics, community hospitals, and medical centers. Our concept of evacuating patients to central facilities such as Landstuhl Regional Medical Center means that we can obtain maximum productivity from very highly specialized physicians, such as vascular surgeons and burn specialists. We bring the 5

patients to the specialists rather than trying to take the specialists to the place of injury. Maintaining the physical infrastructure and the state-ofthe-art training of medical staff that takes place at these facilities is essential. Having addressed our medical support pillars of force health protection, forward stabilization, and evacuating our injured service members to definitive treatment, I would like to briefly touch on a series of coalition partner medical initiatives that are well entrenched in both the European and Central Commands. Among the Unified Commands, European Command is unique in that it works daily with North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and Partnership for Peace nations. We have many years of experience in allied and coalition operations, experience heightened by our past six years in the Balkans. I want to specifically highlight our Multinational Integrated Medical Unit initiative in Kosovo. Each of the five Kosovo sectors operated by the U.S., United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Italy has a significant hospital, but across the Kosovo province, an average of only 15 percent of these hospital beds are utilized at a given point in time. At Camp Bondsteel, in our Multinational Brigade East sector of Kosovo, we have developed, along with the British Forces, a medical facility staffed by both American and British health care providers. It provides world-class medical support to all NATO and coalition forces in the British and American sectors of Operation JOINT GUARDIAN. The agreement that established this facility has been used by the U.S. Central Command as a template for coalition medical operations in Operation ENDURING FREEDOM, and I believe that this type of international and coalition cooperation is the wave of the future. 6

Let me close by stating that this is an exciting time of great change in military medicine, one which is made more challenging by the fact that our people know more, and expect more, from their government and military. We at USEUCOM are proud to have the opportunity to serve. I am proud of the excellent medical support we are able to offer our deployed forces and our beneficiaries. On behalf of all military medical personnel in U.S. European Command, I wish to thank the Congress for its continuing support of our nation s sons and daughters serving overseas. I appreciate this opportunity to outline our concept of medical support, and will be pleased to provide you with any further information you may require. 7