Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

Similar documents
Canadian Hospital Experiences Survey Frequently Asked Questions

Benchmarking variation in coding across hospitals in Canada: A data surveillance approach

From Clinician. to Cabinet: The Use of Health Information Across the Continuum

Rehabilitative Care Alliance

Ontario s Digital Health Assets CCO Response. October 2016

2014/15 Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Narrative

Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Your Symptoms Matter EPIC User Guide

Canadian - Health Outcomes for Better Information and Care (C-HOBIC)

Cancer Care Ontario. High Performance Improves Access to Care for Patients

Patient-Centred Measurement and Reporting in Canada

Health Technology Assessment and Optimal Use: Medical Devices; Diagnostic Tests; Medical, Surgical, and Dental Procedures

HQCA STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK AND BUSINESS PLAN

Low Molecular Weight Heparins

to Orthopedic Patient-Reported Outcome Collection Tools

Access to Health Care Services in Canada, 2003

Health Quality Ontario Business Plan

Helping physicians care for patients Aider les médecins à prendre soin des patients

Optimizing Patient Care Transitions

Quality Standards. Process and Methods Guide. October Quality Standards: Process and Methods Guide 0

End-of-Life Care Action Plan

Insight Driven Health. Top 10. Healthcare Game Changers Canada s Emerging Health Innovations and Trends

PUTTING PATIENTS AT THE CENTRE OF HEALTH CARE: THE USE OF PROMS IN PRIMARY CARE NETWORKS

Improving joint replacement

Alberta Health Services. Strategic Direction

Health System Funding Reform: Driving Change using Technology Presentation to Canadian Health Informatics Association

Stepping up: enabling national strategies for home care

Ontario Systems Projects

Anesthesiology. Anesthesiology Profile

E m e rgency Health S e r v i c e s Syste m M o d e r n i zation

ENVIRONMENTAL SCAN: Patient & Family Experience. June 2013

HQCA STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK AND BUSINESS PLAN

Ontario Strategy for MRI

Jurisprudence Learning Module. Frequently Asked Questions

Quality Improvement Plans (QIP): Progress Report for the 2016/17 QIP

Quality Improvement Plans (QIP): Progress Report for 2013/14 QIP

Health Quality Ontario

Health System Funding Reform: Aligning Levers and Incentives to Achieve Excellent Care for All

Switching EMR Products in Manitoba? What you need to know

Health Quality Ontario

2018 Canadian interrai Conference May 14 17, 2018 CALGARY, ALBERTA CONFERENCE AT A GLANCE HOSTED BY

Major Science Initiatives Fund competition Call for Proposals

Canadian Surgical Site Infection Prevention Audit Month

2018 Canadian interrai Conference May 14 17, 2018 CALGARY, ALBERTA CONFERENCE AT A GLANCE HOSTED BY

Access to Health Care Services in Canada, 2001

Provincial Surveillance

3.01. CCACs Community Care Access Centres Home Care Program. Chapter 3 Section. Overall Conclusion

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SASKATCHEWAN NONPROFIT PARTNERSHIP

Value model in the new healthcare paradigm: Producing value at a single specialty center.

Community Health Centre Program

HOW A PROVINCIAL APPROACH TO PATIENT FLOW IS REDUCING CONSERVABLE BED DAYS AND SAVING SIGNIFICANT COSTS CASE STUDY

Practice-Based Research and Innovation Strategic Plan

Translating developed technology oncology platforms from other healthcare contexts to the Australian healthcare environment

Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research BC SUPPORT Unit Business Plan Overview

Recommendations for Adoption: Heavy Menstrual Bleeding. Recommendations to enable widespread adoption of this quality standard

2017/18 Quality Improvement Plan Improvement Targets and Initiatives

Better Medical Device Data Yield Improved Care The benefits of a national evaluation system

Population Health Management Tools to Improve Care for Individuals and Populations of Patients

Choice of a Case Mix System for Use in Acute Care Activity-Based Funding Options and Considerations

Presentation to the Federal, Provincial and Territorial (FPT) Deputy Ministers of Health Meeting

ONTARIO PATIENT ORIENTED RESEARCH STRATEGY: Patient Reported Outcome-informed Innovation

Best Practices and Performance Measures for Systemic Treatment Computerized Prescriber Order Entry Systems (ST CPOE) in Chemotherapy Delivery

Internet Connectivity Among Aboriginal Communities in Canada

The Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research in Ontario the Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit (OSSU)

Balanced Scorecard Highlights

Primary Health Care System Level Indicators. Presentation March 2015

Services. Progress to date. Comments. Goal. Hours ED patients to our medicall. Maintainn. this year. excluding the. (consolidated) expense,

What Canadians Think Do we really know?

Bundled Payments. AMGA September 25, 2013 AGENDA. Who Are We. Our Business Challenge. Episode Process. Experience

Ontario s Diagnostic Imaging Appropriateness Pilot Project

KNOW Strategic Objectives

Alberta SPOR Graduate Studentship in Patient-Oriented Research. Program Guide

The Assessment of Postoperative Vital Signs: Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

Mental Health Accountability Framework

Transgender/Trans* Health

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: June 22, 2017 Report Length: 5 Pages

TELEHEALTH FOR HEALTH SYSTEMS: GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICES

Agenda Item 6.7. Future PROGRAM. Proposed QA Program Models

September Sub-Region Collaborative Meeting: Bramalea. September 13, 2018

Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Danish Health Care JAN MAINZ MD; PHD; PROFESSOR, DIRECTOR 1

Pay-for-Performance. GNYHA Engineering Quality Improvement

9:00 Conference Welcome: Risha Premarajah, Program Director, IIR Healthcare Conference Series

FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR SURGICAL SERVICES IN BRITISH COLUMBIA

PBGH Response to CMMI Request for Information on Advanced Primary Care Model Concepts

Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Narrative for Health Care Organizations in Ontario

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Updated September 2007

MINISTRY OF HEALTH PATIENT, P F A A TI MIL EN Y, TS C AR AS EGIVER PART AND NER SPU BLIC ENGAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BOARDS OF PHARMACY (NAPB) / AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES OF PHARMACY (AACP) DISTRICT V MEETING THURSDAY, AUGUST 4, 2011

A Collection of Referral and Consultation Process Improvement Projects

Health Technology Review Business Case Template

Payer s Perspective on Clinical Pathways and Value-based Care

McMaster Health Forum Dialogue Summary Modernizing the Oversight of the Health Workforce in Ontario 21 September Evidence >> Insight >> Action

Understanding and promoting good outcomes

Registry General FAQs

Rapid-Learning Healthcare Systems

Children s Hospital of Eastern Ontario

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes

Excellent ICU Care - Is Good Ever Good Enough?

6.6 million. 3,400+ physicians & scientists. Cleveland Clinic bundled payment program key learnings

PERIOPERATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES

Measuring Outcomes. The Key to Value-Based Health Care

Transcription:

1. What are Patient Reported Outcome Measures? Patient Reported Outcome Measures, or PROMs, are measurement instruments (i.e., surveys) that patients complete to provide information on aspects of their health status and quality of life, including symptoms, function, pain and physical and mental health. PROMs also capture patient perspectives on aspects of their health status that are not typically captured by standard diagnostic tools. PROMs are essential to understanding whether health care services and procedures make a difference to patients health status and health care experiences, as they provide insight into the effectiveness of care from the patients perspective and complement existing information on care quality and health care delivery. Additional background information on PROMs is available at www.cihi.ca/proms. 2. Why is the ministry supporting the collection of Patient Reported Outcome Measures? To support the delivery of patient-centred, evidence-based care in Ontario, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (ministry) will be testing the implementation of PROMs in hospital settings across the province over the next three years. PROMs complement traditional, clinical, administrative and client-based outcomes data, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of patient outcomes and the effectiveness of treatment options. The systematic collection of PROMs associated with hip and knee replacement surgery will equip Ontario with a valuable mechanism for measuring patients views on the benefits of these surgeries and promote more patient-centered and consistent care in hospital settings across the province. Although evidence shows that the systematic collection and analysis of PROMs data can lead to better communication and decision-making between doctors and patients and improve patient satisfaction with care, the use of PROMs data in clinical practice is intermittent. Many jurisdictions in Canada and internationally collect PROMs associated with hip and knee replacement surgery; including British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba in Canada and, internationally, the United Kingdom, United States, Australia, and Sweden.

The widespread collection of PROMs associated with hip and knee replacement surgery will thus allow for comparative reporting and benchmarking across Canadian jurisdictions and internationally, which will further benefit Ontario. 3. Has the ministry partnered with any organizations in order to develop and implement the Patient Reported Outcome Measures? In order to appropriately test PROMs collection, the ministry has secured the support of Cancer Care Ontario (CCO), which has a decade of experience in PROMs collection and one of the largest PROMs databases in the world, as well as the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), which is a leader in PROMs standards and manages the Canadian Joint Replacement Registry. These organizations will support the project by establishing PROMs data collection standards, a data collection platform, providing support to participating sites, data processing and analytics, reporting, administration, and IT support and services. To support the successful execution of the PROMs project, the ministry has also convened a PROMs Steering Committee, composed of key stakeholder organizations and PROMs thought leaders, including clinical leaders, from across the province, who will advise on PROMs implementation, site readiness and opportunities for improvement, and ensure alignment between the PROMs project and the bundled hip and knee replacement Quality Based Procedures (QBP) program. 4. What are the guiding principles of the ministry s hip and knee PROMs project? The PROMs project will be guided by the following key principles: o Patients First: The project will promote the delivery of high quality, patient-centred care and support improved patient experiences of care, regardless of where the patient is receiving treatment. o Evidence-based: The project will be rooted in best practices and the PROMs collection tools and PROMs touch-points will be determined based on research evidence. o Value-driven: PROMs collection will support improved patient experiences and enable more patient-centred care, but will not

represent a significant data / cost burden to participating hospital sites or the broader health system. o Support Innovation: PROMs data will be made available to clinicians and policy makers in order to support quality improvement and inform the allocation of health system resources. Data must also align with and be comparable to the PROMs collected in other regions / jurisdictions. o Generalizable: The PROMs collection model that is developed and tested must be transferrable to other conditions / disease states. 5. Why did the ministry select hip and knee replacement surgery as the area of focus for the PROMs project? Hip and knee replacement surgery was selected as the area of focus for the PROMs project for three reasons: 1. Ontario performs nearly 42% of the hip and knee replacement surgeries in Canada, providing significant opportunities for improved patient experiences and outcomes. 2. Ontario s health system spends more than $650 million annually to provide these surgeries 3. Other provinces and jurisdictions are increasingly measuring hip/knee PROM; implementing similar data collection/analysis methods in Ontario would allow for pan-canadian and international comparisons of PROMs data 6. At what points will PROMs data be collected from patients? To align with national standards, best practices, and the key patient interactions of the bundled hip and knee QBP project, participating sites will be required to collect PROMs data at three key touch points along the patient s journey: 1. Pre-surgical assessment (within four weeks prior to surgery) 2. Post-operative assessment (within 90-120 days post-surgery); and 3. One year post-operative assessment

While participating sites are encouraged to collect PROMs as often as they deem necessary, only the three mentioned above are mandatory in order to participate in the program and are the only data points that will be used in comparative analyses. In partnership with CCO and CIHI, the ministry is working to incorporate a fourth touch point, which would be collected at the clinical assessment node, but for the initial phase of the project, only the three collection points identified above will be required. 7. What PROMs tools will be utilized and why were those tools chosen? Based on the recommendations of CIHI s national Hip and Knee PROMs Working Group and the Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR) Advisory Committee, the PROMs project will utilize and support the collection of the EQ-5D-5L (generic survey), and the Oxford Hip/Knee Scores (condition specific). The PROMs tools were selected in order to align with national standards for PROMs in hip/knee arthroplasty. Considerations included: o Psychometric properties of instruments (e.g., reliability, validity, responsiveness) o Clinical acceptance and use across Canada and internationally o Burden of data collection for patients (e.g. survey length, time to complete) and health systems (e.g. licensing fees and requirements) If you have any questions about these tool standards, please contact the CIHI team at proms@cihi.ca. 8. How will PROMs data be collected? To optimize access to PROMs for patients and data for providers, hospitals and policy makers, CCO developed the Integrated Symptom Assessment and Collection (ISAAC) platform. ISAAC enables PROMs to be launched electronically via kiosks or mobile devices, such as smartphones and tablets. ISAAC also automatically pulls data from completed PROMs and transmits it to CCO, where it is passed through data quality assurance protocols. ISSAC has been adapted to hip and knee replacement surgery and will help to ensure that all PROMs data is captured and delivered to providers in a

clinically meaningful manner. Leveraging ISAAC and CCO s expertise in PROMs collection will support the rapid and efficient introduction of electronic collection and reporting of PROMs for hip and knee replacement surgeries across the province. 9. My organization already has a PROMs reporting system or platform; does it need to use CCO s PROMs collection platform? No, it is not mandatory for participating sites to utilize the PROMs collection platform that has been developed by CCO. However, all participating sites will be required to collect the same patient registration data elements (e.g. Health card number, gender etc.) and surveys that are implemented through ISAAC (i.e., EQ-5D-5L and the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores) and provide the collected data to CCO, in a manner dictated by them. The intent of the PROMs project is not to inhibit or otherwise interfere with the excellent PROMs collection work that has been underway in many of Ontario s hospitals. Rather, it is aimed at enabling robust and standard PROMs collection in all of Ontario s orthopedic sites and ensuring consistent and systematic PROMs collection, which will allow for a more comprehensive understanding of patient outcomes and experiences, and enable regional / jurisdictional comparative analyses. 10. What supports (infrastructure, logistics, etc.) will be provided to participating sites to ensure they can meet their reporting requirements? The ministry is committed to supporting all participating sites in the implementation and collection of hip and knee replacement surgery PROMs data. The ministry, in partnership with CCO and CIHI, will be contacting sites to assess the specific needs of each participating hospital. CCO will also provide the following site-specific supports during the project s three year lifecycle, including: o Collaborating with sites to optimize integration of PROMs into clinic workflow at the sites o Providing orientation to site administrators on the use of portals to access data (e.g., ISAAC Administrator Portal)

o Providing ongoing implementation and operational support for sites, including troubleshooting technology and data flow issues o Conducting site visits to assess clinical workflow and address unique facility challenges 11. What will be done with the PROMs data that is collected at participating sites? Patient responses to PROMs will flow directly into the ISAAC database in real-time, and physicians will have immediate access to individual patient responses and physician-level reports via the ISAAC Admin portal (note: realtime data flow is subject to facility internet connectivity). Physician and facilitylevel reporting is enabled as raw data, and more sophisticated reporting will need to be explored as part of the project. Automatically generated ISSAC reporting functionalities can help measure PROM uptake in clinics and view patient response trends over time. CCO will provide CIHI with regular data cuts via the ISAAC database, enabling CIHI to provide sites with performance measurement and reporting with both provincial and national comparisons. 12. Does a hospital already have to be submitting patient experience data to CIHI in order to participate in the PROMs project? No. The collection of patient experience data is not a prerequisite for participation in the PROMs project. 13. Will participating sites have access to real-time PROMs data? Yes. PROMs data that patients enter into a tablet or kiosk that hosts the ISAAC platform will be sent to the ISAAC database in real-time. The clinical care team will have immediate access to all individual patient responses via the ISAAC Administrator portal. In addition, patient-level PROMs data will be available to sites via summary reports in the ISAAC Administrator portal. 14. Can patients use their home computers or other personal devices to input their PROMs data? Not at this time. The primary patient access points will be electronic platforms in the clinic either on a kiosk (desktop computer) or Windows tablets. The ministry is committed to looking into opportunities in the future to expand patient access points for PROMs collection.

15. If my organization is participating in the bundled hip and knee QBP program, is it mandatory to collect Patient Reported Outcome Measures? Yes. Sites participating in the bundled hip and knee QBP project will be required to collect PROMs data in order to enable the consistent and systematic collection of valuable data that will inform patient care and potentially improve patient outcomes and experiences. The ministry, in partnership with CCO and CIHI, will ensure sites have the supports and resources they need to successfully collect PROMs and will be reaching out to sites individually to assess their specific needs. 16. Can my organization participate in the PROMs project if it is not participating in the bundled hip and knee QBP program? Yes. Participation in the PROMs project is voluntary for non-bundled sites and all interested hospital sites are encouraged to participate. One of the primary objectives of the pilot is to establish a mechanism for the ongoing collection of PROMs (associated with multiple conditions) across the province and ultimately expand PROMs collection beyond the bundled hip and knee QBP sites. 17. Will there be additional funding associated with hospitals participating in the PROMs project? No. There will not be additional funding provided to sites participating in the PROMs project. However, the ministry is committed to providing participating sites with the supports (including technological hardware) they need in order to successfully fulfill their reporting requirements and facilitate PROMs collection across the province. The ministry is also committed to working with CIHI to assess any site-specific costs associated with PROMs tool licensing. 18. Will the collection of Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) be required as part of participation in the bundled hip and knee QBP program? Yes. The ministry is currently working on the identification and validation of appropriate PREMs to collect at participating sites. Once finalized, PREMs will be collected in the same manner as PROMs (outlined above). More

information on PREMs questions and collection methodology will be shared with sites at a later date. 19. What are the timelines for the rollout of the PROMs project? Sites will be brought online in a phased approach, based on site readiness, resources, needs, and capacity. First wave sites will be up and running in early Q1 2018/19. Participating sites will be expected to work with CCO to ensure the requirements of implementing PROMs are met and enable the necessary data flow to CCO. 20. Where can I go for additional information? Guidance documents, a briefing note, and other resources can be found on the Health Quality Ontario website: https://quorum.hqontario.ca/en/home/community/groups/attachments/gro upid/34?folderid=3796&view=gridview&pagesize=10 If you have any further questions, please contact Shelby Challis (shelby.challis@ontario.ca).