UCF REC Meaningful Use Checklist

Similar documents
Core Measure Set. Status. MU1 Increase from 30% New. Computerized Physician Order Entry Use computerized provider order. NextGen EHR Medication Module

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

during the EHR reporting period.

EHR Meaningful Use Guide

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

in partnership with EHR Meaningful Use Guide for HITECH Attestation

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

MEANINGFUL USE BASICS

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

ecw and NextGen MEETING MU REQUIREMENTS

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version 1.0

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

Meaningful Use May, 2012

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

The HITECH EHR "Meaningful Use" Requirements for Hospitals and Eligible Professionals

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

Meaningful Use Stage 2

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

Meaningful Use Measures: Quick Reference Guide Stage 2 (2014 and Beyond)

ARRA New Opportunities for Community Mental Health

Meaningful Use Roadmap

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures. User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule CPeH Advocacy Opportunities

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

A complete step by step guide on how to achieve Meaningful Use Core Set Measures in Medgen EHR.

EHR/Meaningful Use

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

REQUIREMENTS GUIDE: How to Qualify for EHR Stimulus Funds under ARRA

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

Meaningful use glossary and requirements table

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 1 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

2014 PCMH Standards: How CPCI Can Help with Transformation. CHCANYS Quality Improvement Program November 20, 2014

The History of Meaningful Use

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

AHA Survey on Hospitals Ability to Meet Meaningful Use Requirements of the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Programs

Meaningful Use for 2014 Stag St e ag 1 Or Or Stag St e ag e 2 For Fo r 2014? Meaningful Meaningful Use: Stag St e ag e 1 1 Fo r Fo 2014

Community Health Centers. May 6, 2010

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

GE Healthcare. Meaningful Use 2014 Prep: Core Part 1. Ramsey Antoun, Training Operations Coordinator December 12, 2013

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Eligible Professionals. How can the West Virginia Health Information Network (WVHIN) assist you in meeting Meaningful Use requirements?

Eligible Professional Core Measure Frequently Asked Questions

Understanding Your Meaningful Use Report

Exchange 9/30/2010. Hawai i Health Information

Meaningful Use Stage 1 and 2 Your Survival Guide!

9/28/2011. Learning Agenda. Meaningful Use and why it s here. Meaningful Use Rules of Participation. Categories, Objectives and Thresholds

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

Iatric Systems Supports the Achievement of Meaningful Use

HITECH Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Stimulus Package. HITECH Act Meaningful Use (MU)

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

Preparing for a New Era in Health Care

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Security Risk Analysis and 365 Days of Meaningful Use. Rodney Gauna & Val Tuerk, Object Health

April 10 th :00pm 1:00 pm

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and Beyond

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Strategies. Presented by: C. Johnson, BS-HSA

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

Moving HIT and Meaningful Use

EHR Incentives. Profit by using LOGO a certified EHR. EHR vs. EMR. PQRI Incentives. Incentives available

Transcription:

www.ucf-rec.g UCF REC Meaningful Use Checklist Practice ame: Location: Date Completed: Completed by: Measure & Set Measure Quick Key Site Provider: Provider: Provider: Provider: Provider: 1 Ce CPOE Medication Order 2 Ce Drug Interaction Checks Y 3 Ce Problem List 4 Ce erx 5 Ce Active Medication List 6 Ce Medication Allergy List 7 Ce Demographics 8 Ce Vital Signs University of Central Flida College of Medicine Regional Extension Center. In Partnership with: The Office of the ational Codinat f Health Infmation Technology (OC). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Grant 90RC0043/01

www.ucf-rec.g 9 Ce Smoking Status 10 Ce CQMs Y 11 Ce Clinical Decision Suppt Rule Y 12 Ce Electronic copy of health info 13 Ce Clinical Summary 14 Ce Exchange clinical info Y 15 Ce Security Risk Analysis Y 1 Menu Drug fmulary checks Y 2 Menu Lab test results 3 Menu Specific patient lists Y 4 Menu Reminders 5 Menu Electronic access to health info University of Central Flida College of Medicine Regional Extension Center. In Partnership with: The Office of the ational Codinat f Health Infmation Technology (OC). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Grant 90RC0043/01

www.ucf-rec.g 6 Menu Patient education 7 Menu Transitions of care: medications 8 Menu Transitions of care: summary 9 Menu Immunization Registry Y 10 Menu Syndromic Surveillance Y University of Central Flida College of Medicine Regional Extension Center. In Partnership with: The Office of the ational Codinat f Health Infmation Technology (OC). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Grant 90RC0043/01

www.ucf-rec.g Measure & Type Objective Measure Exclusions 1 Ce Use computerized physician der entry (CPOE) f medication ders directly entered by any licensed healthcare professional who can enter ders into the medical recd per state, local and professional guidelines 2 Ce Implement drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks Me than 30% of unique patients with at least one medication in their medication list seen by the EP have at least one medication der entered using CPOE The EP has enabled this functionality f the entire EHR repting Any EP who writes fewer than 100 prescriptions during the EHR repting 3 Ce Maintain an up-to-date problem list of current and active diagnoses Me than 80% of all unique patients seen by the EP have at least one entry an indication that no problems are known f the patient recded as structured data 4 Ce Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (erx) Me than 40% of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are transmitted electronically using certified EHR technology Any EP who writes fewer than 100 prescriptions during the EHR repting 5 Ce Maintain active medication list Me than 80% of all unique patients seen by the EP have at least one entry ( an indication that the patient is not currently prescribed any medication) recded as structured data 6 Ce Maintain active medication allergy list Me than 80% of all unique patients seen by the EP have at least one entry ( an indication that the patient has no known medication allergies) recded as structured data 7 Ce Recd demographics: preferred language, gender, race, ethnicity, date of birth Me than 50% of all unique patients seen by the EP have demographics recded as structured data University of Central Flida College of Medicine Regional Extension Center. In Partnership with: The Office of the ational Codinat f Health Infmation Technology (OC). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Grant 90RC0043/01

www.ucf-rec.g 8 Ce Recd and chart changes in vital signs: height, weight, blood pressure, calculate and display BMI, plot and display growth charts f children 2-20 years including BMI 9 Ce Recd smoking status f patients 13 years older F me than 50% of all unique patients age 2 over seen by the EP, height, weight and blood pressure are recded as structured data Me than 50% of all unique patients 13 years old older seen by the EP have smoking status recded Any EP who either sees no patients 2 years older, who believes that all three vital signs of height, weight, and blood pressure of their patients have no relevance to their scope of practice Any EP who sees no patients 13 years older 10 Ce Rept ambulaty clinical quality measures to CMS the State of Flida F 2011, provide aggregate numerat, denominat, and exclusions through attestation 11 Ce Implement one clinical decision suppt rule relevant to specialty high clinical priity along with the ability to track compliance with that rule 12 Ce Provide patients with an electronic copy of their health infmation (including diagnostic test results, problem list, medication lists, medication allergies) upon request 13 Ce Provide clinical summaries f patients f each office visit Implement one clinical decision suppt rule Me than 50% of all patients of the EP who request an electronic copy of their health infmation are provided it within 3 business days Clinical summaries provided to patients f me than 50% of all office visits within 3 business days Any EP that has no requests from patients their agents f an electronic copy of patient health infmation during the EHR repting Any EP who has no office visits during the EHR repting 14 Ce Capability to exchange key clinical infmation (f example, problem list, medication list, medication allergies, diagnostic test results), among providers of care and patient authized entities electronically Perfmed at least one test of certified EHR technology's capacity to electronically exchange key clinical infmation University of Central Flida College of Medicine Regional Extension Center. In Partnership with: The Office of the ational Codinat f Health Infmation Technology (OC). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Grant 90RC0043/01

www.ucf-rec.g 15 Ce Protect electronic health infmation created maintained by the certified EHR technology through the implementation of appropriate technical capabilities Conduct review a security risk analysis per 45 CFR 164.308 (a)(1) of the Final Rule and implement security updates as necessary and crect identified security deficiencies as part of its risk management process 1 Menu Implement drug-fmulary checks The EP has enabled this functionality f the entire EHR repting external drug fmulary f the entire EHR repting 2 Menu Incpate clinical lab-test results into certified EHR technology as structured data 3 Menu Generate lists of patients by specific conditions to use f quality improvement, reduction of disparities, research outreach Me than 40% of all clinical lab-test results dered by the EP during the EHR repting whose results are either in a positive/negative numerical fmat are incpated in certified EHR technology as structured data Generate at least one rept listing patients of the EP with a specific condition Any EP who ders no lab tests whose results are either in positive/negative numeric fmat during the EHR repting 4 Menu Send reminders to patients per patient preference f preventive/follow-up care 5 Menu Provide patients with timely electronic access to their health infmation (including lab results, problem list, medication lists, medication allergies) within four business days of the infmation being available to the EP Me than 20% of all unique patients 65 years old older 5 years old younger were sent an appropriate reminder during the EHR repting Me than 10% of all unique patients seen by the EP are provided timely (available to the patient within four business days of being updated in the certified EHR technology) electronic access to their health infmation subject to the EP's discretion to withhold certain infmation Any EP who has no patients 65 years old older 5 years old younger with recds maintained using certified EHR technology Any EP that neither ders n creates any of the infmation listed at 45 CFR 170.304(g) in the July 13, 2010 Final Rule during the EHR repting University of Central Flida College of Medicine Regional Extension Center. In Partnership with: The Office of the ational Codinat f Health Infmation Technology (OC). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Grant 90RC0043/01

www.ucf-rec.g 6 Menu Use certified EHR technology to identify patient-specific education resources and provide those resources to the patient if appropriate 7 Menu The EP who receives a patient from another setting of care provider of care believes an encounter is relevant should perfm medication reconciliation 8 Menu The EP who transitions their patient to another setting of care provider of care refers their patient to another provider of care should provide summary of care recd f each transition of care referral 9 Menu Capability to submit electronic data to immunization registries Immunization Infmation Systems and actual submission in accdance with applicable law and practice 10 Menu Capability to submit electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies and actual submission in accdance with applicable law and practice Me than 10% of all unique patients seen by the EP are provided patient-specific education resources The EP perfms medication reconciliation f me than 50% of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP The EP who transitions refers their patient to another setting of care provider of care provides a summary of care recd f me than 50% of transitions of care and referrals Perfmed at least one test of certified EHR technology capacity to submit electronic data to immunization registries and follow up submission if the test is successful (unless none of the immunization registries to which the EP submits such infmation have the capacity to receive the infmation electronically) Perfmed at least one test of certified EHR technology capacity to submit electronic technology capacity to submit electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies and follow-up submission if the test is successful (unless none of the public health agencies to which an EP submits infmation have the capacity to receive the infmation electronically) Any EP who was not the recipient of any transitions of care during the EHR repting Any EP who neither transfers a patient to another setting n refers a patient to another provider during the EHR repting Any EP who administers no immunizations during the EHR repting where no immunization registry has the capacity to receive the infmation electronically Any EP who does not collect any reptable syndromic infmation on their patients during the EHR repting does not submit such infmation to any public health agency that has the capacity to receive the infmation electronically University of Central Flida College of Medicine Regional Extension Center. In Partnership with: The Office of the ational Codinat f Health Infmation Technology (OC). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Grant 90RC0043/01